The media should apologize to the Catholic Church…but won’t

Image: Jim Choate via FlickrCC BY-NC 2.0 (cropped).

By Greg Maresca

When the news percolated, it was nothing short of a Category Five media hurricane.  It was over two years ago that the Canadian government declared that thousands of indigenous children were buried in unmarked “mass graves” at residential schools established by the government and run by the Catholic Church.

It was suggested that many were even murdered.

Catholic missionaries have a longstanding history of successfully establishing and running boarding schools not just in Canada, but worldwide.  Across America’s northern neighbor, the Catholic Church had been teaching and caring for indigenous children since the 1800s.  That finally came to an end at the conclusion of the 20th century.

Apparently, the story was far from over.  When the “news” broke that a mass of unmarked graves were uncovered, it was the perfect storm to condemn the Church that has been dealing with a series of sex abuse cases and declining church attendance.

The Machiavellian maxim that Rahm Emanuel, formerly of the Obama administration, turned into leftist dogma of “not allowing a crisis to go to waste” applied.  It did not matter how flimsy and unverifiable the supposed evidence: blame Catholics for the deaths of thousands of indigenous children.

The hype not only lit up the internet but resulted in dozens of churches across Canada being desecrated, vandalized, and set ablaze.  One civil rights activist said of the churches, “Burn it all down” — proving once again that tolerance in the modern sense of the word is quite selective.   

The litany of apologies came from every Canadian corner and province, reaching all the way to the Vatican with Pope Francis himself,

Flash forward two years later: at 14 “mass grave” sites, all the alleged skeletal remains were nothing but “aberrations in the soil, rocks, tree roots, and the like.”  No human remains were found.  According to various news reports, many other graves Bottom of Formwere simply overgrown cemeteries that were once cared for by the provincial municipalities and the local Catholic churches that are now part of Native lands.  Those graves remained unmarked because the Native tribes did not replace the dilapidated wooden crosses.

According to the Catholic League, Murray Sinclair, of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada, said the number of children corpses was 15,000–25,000.  

Officials have yet to find one.  As fate would have it, the Church was not dumping and burying dead children in mass graves for nearly two centuries.  So where are the apologies to the Church?

It wasn’t too long ago that Ireland had its own version of mass grave mania, claiming that the bodies of 800 children were found in an unmarked mass grave outside a former orphanage run by nuns.  

To the left’s chagrin, that too was all a hoax minus the apologies,

The media and their government allies would never miss an opportunity to pile on the Catholic Church.  Malfeasance against the Church is a blood sport among Marxist politicos.  Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau is the perfect political paradigm, who would never pass up a self-serving photo opportunity.  Trudeau quickly took a knee at one of these supposed mass grave sites, bowing his head and armed with a teddy bear, “paying his respects.”

Mass graves.  Murder.  There was none.  The consequences of bigotry can be Spartan, especially when government secularists are involved.

All that counts in Wokedom is the agenda and outcome.  Such a dual combination outweighs any evidence.  Preconceptions reign supreme, and the presumption of guilt is all that matters.  

Mark Twain’s timeless metaphor rings loud: “A lie can travel around the world and back again while the truth is lacing up its boots.”  Bringing the truth to light today is too often viewed as a  Sisyphean task and frequently never gets accomplished to any meaningful degree.

There were a plethora of news stories proclaiming the horror of these “mass graves,” but less than a tenth correcting this aberration of a news non-story.

Yet certain folks remain flummoxed as to why trust in Congress, government, and news outlets remain at all-time lows.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2023/09/the_media_should_apologize_to_the_catholic_churchbut_wont.html

Germany’s right-wing AfD party surges in Brandenburg, now holds 1st place by 12 points

The Alternative for Germany (AfD) party saw an incredible jump of 9 points in the German state of Brandenburg since the RBB’s last survey, with the party now at a record high of 32 points.

Elections in Brandenburg, which is the state surrounding the capital of Berlin, are still a year away, set for Sept. 22, 2024, but the result shows how far the AfD has come in the east of the country. The last time RBB ran its Brandenburg Trend poll in April, the AfD was only at 23 percent. With the latest result, the AfD is only performing better in Saxony, where it is also in first place at 35 percent.

That gap between the other parties and the AfD is also notable, with the second-place Social Democrats (SPD) also 12 points behind the AfD. The Christian Democrats, with whom the SPD is in a coalition in the German state, is also only at 18 points, having lost five points since the last survey. Meanwhile, the Greens, which are also in the coalition, are at 8 percent, which means that the three parties would no longer have enough votes to maintain their coalition if the election were held now.

The poll also showed that 57 percent of respondents expressed dissatisfaction with the SPD-CDU-Green state government, while only 38 percent were satisfied.

Remix News has covered the rise of AfD in the polls over the last year, as well as the party’s extremely strong showing in the east of the country, where it is in first place in four of five of the states.

https://rmx.news/germany/germanys-right-wing-afd-party-surges-in-brandenburg-now-holds-1st-place-by-12-points/

Greece: Pakistani man sexually assaulted a 60-year-old woman

On September 9, 2023, at 9:00 p.m., a 60-year-old local woman, a resident of Menetis Karpathos, reported that at 8:15 p.m. of the same day she was attacked by a dark-skinned man aged approximately 25-30 years, who was wearing a white shirt and turquoise short pants.

According to her testimony, he approached her without her noticing when he was walking her dog. He grabbed her by the shoulders and chest. When she resisted, he threw her to the ground with force, Dimokratiki reported.

The police found a 24-year-old Pakistani who matched the description on the beach of Pigadia. They brought him in, and the 60-year-old woman identified him without reservation, asking for his criminal prosecution.

The file that was created will be submitted to the Criminal Prosecution of Rhodes for further action.

Elsewhere, a 38-year-old Pakistani national was arrested yesterday morning by the police authorities in Thessaloniki, while a case was filed against the foreigner for violating the Law on the Customs Code.

The police handcuffed the 38-year-old in the centre of Thessaloniki, as he was found in possession of 3 boxes containing 1,500 packs of cigarettes without the relevant consumption tax tape of the Greek government, which he had earlier received from a courier company.

In contrast, an additional 125 were found inside the house contraband packages of tobacco, likewise seized.

The arrested person will be taken to the Criminal Prosecutor of Thessaloniki.

https://greekcitytimes.com/2023/09/14/karpathos-pakistani-woman/

A Syrian man suddenly stabs a snack bar employee in Soest,Germany – The police concealed the nationality and asylum status of the attacker in their report

Wikimedia Commons, Bubinator, CC-BY-SA-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0

According to information by the newspaper JF, the police in Soest, North Rhine-Westphalia, arrested a Syrian on Tuesday who allegedly attacked a snack bar employee with a knife, inflicting life-threatening injuries. According to the newspaper Soester Anzeiger, the suspect lives in the local central accommodation facility for asylum seekers. The man had already been banned from the snack bar.

The incident was preceded by a scuffle with the employee. The Syrian pulled out a knife and stabbed the 42-year-old “abruptly in the neck”, according to the police. The artery in his neck was narrowly missed, but the employee still suffered a “gaping wound” in his neck. The attacker, who was not yet known to the police, fled, but was later arrested after he reappeared at the scene.

However, due to a language barrier, an interrogation has not yet taken place. The police were also unable to find the weapon at the time of the arrest, and the search is ongoing. The injured employee was taken to a nearby hospital for further treatment. In their press release, the police had concealed the nationality and asylum status of the Syrian and wrote of two people from Soest.

https://jungefreiheit.de/politik/deutschland/2023/stich-in-den-hals-polizei-nimmt-syrer-in-soest-fest/

In Germany, a government minister goes after critics of radical Islam

Sigrid Herrmann-Marschall, https://hpd.de/

Sigrid Herrmann (SPD) is an expert on political Islam and publishes the blog “Islamism and Society,” where she provides well-founded reports on the main actors and activities of radical Islam in Germany. Herrmann helped reveal the connections between the “charitable organization” Islamic Relief, the Muslim Brotherhood and its Gaza affiliate, Hamas.

Islamic Relief is banned in Israel and the UAE for its terror ties, but was funded by the German government, advertised by German public broadcasters and supported by major German political figures such as President Frank-Walter Steinmeier and Bundestag Vice-President Aydan Özoguz, until Herrmann’s revelations in 2021, when they had to shelve the collaboration.

Since 2017, Herrmann had been exposing the anti-Semitic attitudes within the leadership of Islamic Relief Worldwide, which were published by the London Times and led to the entire leadership resigning in 2020.

At the end of July, German Interior Minister Nancy Faeser released a 400-page report on alleged “Anti-Muslim Sentiment,” in which critics of political Islam like Herrmann are defamed, using taxpaer funds. In the report, to which Faeser contributed the Foreword, the Interior Ministry accuses leading German Islamism expert Herrmann, of all people, of “lack of expertise.”

The report accuses Herrmann of “scouring social media profiles of Muslims in order to reveal connections to the Muslim Brotherhood, anti-Semitic beliefs, and infiltration strategies.”

Soros- and German-government-funded “Hate speech watchdogs” regularly “scour the social media profiles” of right-wingers, including pro-Israel conservatives in Germany, as I recently described on Arutz Sheva. Apparently, Faeser’s Interior Ministry only criticizes these methods when the Muslim Brotherhood is the target.

Faeser’s Interior Ministry takes issue with Herrmann’s research on radical Islam being published in “right-wing conservative and anti-Islamic blogs like Henryk M. Broder’s ‘The Axis of Good’ or the ‘Jüdische Rundschau.‘ “The Axis of Good” has been under attack by antisemitic trolls, supported by German government-financed “Hate Speech” NGOs, as Eoin Lenihan described on Arutz Sheva. The “Jüdische Rundschau” is Germany’s largest independent Jewish newspaper.

The Interior Ministry goes on to complain that even “reputable media” like Deutsche Welle and Welt quote Herrmann. Furthermore, she was invited by the Christian Democrats’ “Berlin Circle” along with former domestic intelligence chief Hans-Georg Maassen, head of the conservative Values Union caucus. Additionally, the Interior Ministry falsely claims that Herrmann was invited to the North Rhine-Westphalian state parliament for the right-wing AfD.

What is wrong with all this is the Interior Ministry’s outlook, however, which seems to view its role in harassing critics of radical Islam rather than monitoring the radicals themselves.

Herrmann calls the charge of “Islamophobia” “absurd,” noting that she has “always made a clear distinction between extremists and harmless practice of religion.”

From 2012 to 2016, for example, Herrmann “carried out a street campaign in Frankfurt to draw attention to the danger of the Koran distribution campaign “LIES!” (Read!). During this dangerous action in public I was under police protection. In those years, I didn’t see any of those Islamist officials, who like to pretend to be representatives of all Muslims, risking anything to protect young Muslims. “LIES!” was banned in Germany at the end of 2016,” Herrmann said.

Instead of going after radical Islamists, Herrmann said, the Interior Ministry prefers to make “false and defamatory statements” about her with the aim of “discrediting … my entire work”.

“Strikingly”, the German Interior Ministry uses “the same arguments, sometimes with the same wording,” as the Islamists she has exposed, Herrmann says. “So it’s no surprise that Salafists, Muslim Brotherhood and Turkish nationalists are now applauding. And it doesn’t matter who copied from which Islamists here, because the report was commissioned by the Interior Ministry. The supposedly independent “experts” were selected by the ministry. And now the report is being published and distributed by the Interior Ministry. It is therefore the German Federal Ministry of the Interior that is responsible for the claims made in this report.”

Writing in Welt newspaper, Lennart Pfahler revealed how Islamist organizations contributed to the German Interior Ministry’s “Islamophobia” report, including the Islamic League of Shiite Communities in Germany (IGS), which is controlled by the Tehran- and Hezbollah-affiliated Islamic Center Hamburg (IZH), according to the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution; and Cologne-based Fair International, which is affiliated with the Erdogan-controlled Islamic Community Milli Görüs (IGMG), founded by Turkish Islamist Necmettin Erbakan.

Now, Herrmann is suing the Interior Ministry for defamation, and is raising funds for her legal expenses on GoFundMe. Time will tell.

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/376987

Italy’s Lampedusa declares a state of emergency after around 7000 migrants arrive on the island in just 24 hours

screen grab X

In a dramatic situation in Lampedusa, the southern island of Italy, a massive influx of migrants has arrived by sea from North Africa posing challenges for Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s government. Mayor Filippo Mannino declared a state of emergency on the island of Lampedusa on Wednesday evening, September 13, following the arrival of thousands of migrants aboard boats.

According to the reports, Mannino requested assistance for his island, which he described as under “heavy pressure.” The mayor stated that the people were desperate. “Everyone has helped migrants who needed it in their own way, but it’s now time to find a structural solution,” he suggested.

Since Monday, September 11, boats carrying several thousand migrants have arrived on the island of Lampedusa, which lies between Sicily and North Africa. According to the Italian Ministry of the Interior, 5,000 individuals arrived on the Mediterranean island on Tuesday, September 12 alone.

The Lampedusa migrant registration camp, which has a capacity of 400 people, is entirely full. Currently, about 6,800 migrants are on the island, which has an area of roughly 20 square kilometres and a population of about 6,000 people. The island is 190 km from Sfax, Tunisia’s coastal city.

Tensions arose at the port on Wednesday, September 13 afternoon as hundreds of migrants attempted to leave and breach security barriers. There were videos circulating showing police attempting to push them back.

Transport Minister Matteo Salvini commented on the issue and said that some 120 boats arrived on Wednesday, September 13 alone. the migrants, as per the reports are climbing up Lampedusa’s rocky shores on their own, scuffling over food and bottles of water, and also are jumping into the sea to cool off.

“We will probably get to 100 landings today, the island can no longer sustain these numbers,” Mayor Filippo Mannino added.

According to interior ministry figures, over 118,500 boat migrants have arrived in Italy since the beginning of the year, nearly double the 64,529 registered in the same period in 2022.

Reports mention that Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who was elected last year on a promise to combat irregular immigration, has failed to reduce numbers as a crackdown on migrants in Tunisia and ongoing unrest in Libya have led to additional sea crossings from North Africa.

Worsening economic and social conditions in Tunisia have contributed to the rise, putting further strain on Lampedusa, Italy’s southernmost island and the first port of call for many crossings from North Africa.

Migrants who arrive in Lampedusa or elsewhere in Sicily usually leave, with many attempting to get to northern Europe.

Mayors in different areas have complained about being left with the main burden of caring for migrants, with no financial help from the federal government, particularly for unaccompanied children.

Members of the ruling coalition have accused the EU of failing to provide adequate support to Italy. Meloni led the EU to reach an agreement with Tunisia in July to halt migration flows, but the agreement has had little impact thus far. Charities have been accused of collaborating with human smugglers and urging migrants to set sail knowing that they will be rescued. Both charges, however, according to charities, are incorrect.

Italy is aiming for similar accords with other origin and transit countries. The government has also taken a harsh line on migrant rescue organizations, impounding their boats, prohibiting numerous rescues, and requiring them to go farther away to release migrants.

https://www.opindia.com/2023/09/italys-lampedusa-island-declares-emergency-after-over-7000-migrants-arrive/#google_vignette

Climate Eugenics

By Andrea Widburg

Suppose the world was in the grip of an Armageddon-type crisis with the finest scientific minds from around the world working at a feverish pitch in an international collaborative effort to find a solution. So much so that medical and scientific journals were dedicated to keeping pace with the latest developments. No, I’m not talking about climate change. I’m talking about eugenics, the early 20th-century belief that there were too many of the wrong people in the world. One hundred years on, though, eugenics has fused with climate change for the perfect anti-human storm.

The founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, a progressive, was one of the most strident supporters of this new theory. Financial support poured in from the Ford Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Harriman fortune. (These funds all still support progressive causes.) In 1916, Sanger established the first “birth control” clinic.

Back in that era, it was commonly believed that “the best” human beings (white, Anglo-Saxon Protestants) were not having as many children as “inferior ones,” such the immigrants from Eastern Europe and Asia, blacks, degenerates, etc. Sanger spoke of the burden of carrying the “dead weight of human waste.” President Theodore Roosevelt, the first progressive presidential candidate, declared that “Society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce their kind.”

And how was society to prevent “the inferiors” from reproducing? Simple: sterilize them. Eventually, twenty-nine states passed laws allowing sterilization.

Image by Andrea Widburg using a public domain image of Margaret Sanger and a photo by Ivan Radic (CC BY 2.0).

When these laws were challenged in the U.S. Supreme Court in a case involving the “Virginia Colony for Epileptics and Feeble-Minded,” Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, a progressive, ruled in favor of sterilization, declaring that “three generations of imbeciles are enough.”

Eugenics was a terrible ideology and one that should never be forgotten, but the world’s “elite” loved it. The famous playwright and polemicist George Bernard Shaw (a socialist who admired Hitler) once said that only eugenics could save mankind.

The Nazis, inspired by the American eugenics movement, were the most radical proponents of eugenics. In fact, they took it one step further. Why sterilize “mental defectives” when it was more effective simply to kill them? In this endeavor, they had help from the United States. The Rockefeller Foundation funded the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute and the work of its radical scientists, one of whom was Josef Mengele.

This is how it worked: The alleged “mental defectives” in Germany were brought into houses where they were interviewed. They were then shown to a back room where they were gassed with carbon monoxide and later disposed of in a crematorium. All in a day’s work.

Eventually, the German killing machine was expanded into a vast network of railways that shipped over 10 million “undesirables” to concentration camps where they would be gassed with lethal cyanide. After World War II, many of the public disciples of the pseudoscience of eugenics fell silent.

At the time, though, the proponents of eugenics claimed that they were doing a good thing, for they were improving the human race. Anyone who objected was easily marginalized.

Today we are in the throes of another false theory, i.e. climate change and all of its ugly ramifications. In fact, the parallels between climate change and eugenics are downright ominous. The first to person to recognize these ominous parallels and candidly discuss them was the late Dr. Michael Crichton in his 2004 book State of Fear. (At the time, Crichton genuinely feared publishing State of Fear, worrying that the book’s theme, which challenged climate change dogma, could get him killed.)

Despite climate change theories being debunked as fast as they are propounded, the true believers make sure they won’t go away. They hide behind the word “unprecedented.” Everything that’s happened before on planet Earth—heat waves, drought, rain, wildfires, storms—is unprecedented, making it beyond challenge and justifying draconian, anti-human policies.

True climate science has been hijacked by an aggressive cabal of elites who wish to rule over the rest of us. Striving to prevent “climate change” gives them the ideal mechanism: once you control the energy, air and water quality, the food supply, etc., can control every aspect of people’s lives. In other words, through climate, you will have gained the same level of control over humanity that the eugenicists dreamed of and the Nazis almost achieved—all ostensibly to make the world a better place.

The scholar and critic H.L. Mencken presciently declared, “The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.”

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2023/09/climate_eugenics.html

‘A declaration of war on Europe’ – Salvini says 6,000 migrants landing on Lampedusa in 1 day threatens to collapse Italian society

Social media has been awash with videos of migrants storming the shores of Italy in recent days, and Italy’s nominally conservative government is being forced to respond.

Italian Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini, known for his hawkish stance on immigration during his tenure as interior minister in 2018, said on Wednesday that when 120 boats filled with migrants arrive on the shores of Italy at the same time, “it is not a spontaneous phenomenon, it is a declaration of war on Europe.”

The deputy prime minister of the right-wing government in Rome, who currently heads the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport, referred to the fact that the boats with approximately 6,000 migrants docked on the island of Lampedusa in one day. He stressed that the problem was not exclusive to Lampedusa and that the situation threatened to “collapse Italian society as a whole.”

Salvni said he is convinced that mass migration to Europe was being orchestrated by criminal organizations, including human trafficking organizations. He added that Europe had completely abandoned Italy to protect its land and maritime borders and that Rome should act on its own to further tighten national security and migration regulations.

Salvini first met with League ministers, state secretaries and parliamentarians behind closed doors, before holding a press conference at the headquarters of the Foreign Correspondents’ Association in Rome. He also presented the issues on the RAI evening news program.

“The united center-right that came to government almost a year ago is working well in Italy, the same united center-right that gives us hope to make a difference in Europe,” Salvini said.

Video footage of boat after boat made waves on social media, with it serving as a visceral reminder of the spiraling immigration crisis Europe is facing.

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni ran on a campaign platform of blocking migrants and setting up a “naval blockade;” however, since coming to power, she has overseen a record number of illegal migrants arriving in Italy and has even approved plans for Italy to accept over 400,000 non-EU legal migrants per year.

Salvini, who managed to reduce illegal immigration dramatically when he served as interior minister, appears to value unity with Meloni at the moment and is not showing any public signs that he is ready to challenge his coalition partner. As Remix News previously reported, despite Meloni’s U-turn on immigration, she has maintained strong polling numbers in Italy, and the country’s growing immigration crisis does not appear to have dented her appeal with voters.

Salvini stated that uniting European conservatives and moderates is the only way to “send the socialists home,” referring to the European Parliament elections next year. He noted that the stakes of the elections amount to the future of Europe.

The immigration crisis could galvanize voters to swing to the right, but it could also backfire, especially if the scenes in Lampedusa and elsewhere in Italy begin to filter to the broader Italian populace, who may start to view the ruling the conservative government with skepticism. The EU, for its part, has done little to aid Italy, and if anything, could turn the screws on Meloni’s government if she takes any significant action to stem the immigration crisis.

Salvini also announced that on Saturday and Sunday the traditional annual meeting of the League, to be held in Pontida, Lombardy, will be attended by Marine Le Pen, leader of the French National Rally. Le Pen has come out in support of Salvini since the Meloni government formed, saying she is more ideologically aligned with the League party leader. Le Pen, in particular, says she rejects Meloni’s foreign policy stances.

The League leader also touched on the war in Ukraine, saying that a small state like the Vatican is doing more to stop the conflict than many major powers. Salvini said that Cardinal Matteo Zuppi, who is leading the peace mission launched by Pope Francis and is in Beijing for talks, has done more than the European Union.

The war in Ukraine remains another major point of contention between Salvini and Meloni, with Salvini seeking to disengage Italy from sending weapons to Ukraine, whereas Meloni has taken a more pro-Brussels stance and sought to eslcate Italy’s role in the conflict.

https://rmx.news/italy/a-declaration-of-war-on-europe-salvini-says-6000-migrants-landing-on-lampedusa-in-1-day-threatens-to-collapse-italian-society/

Dutch Farmer Party Calls for Hard Asylum Seeker Cap and Opt-Out of EU Green Agenda in Election Manifesto

BBB candidate for prime minister Mona Keijzer

The Dutch pro-farmer populist party has set out a vision of self-determination for the people of the Netherlands, arguing in its election manifesto that the country should have the right to “opt-out” of European Union agreements on the climate and mass migration.

Firmly planting its flag on the populist right of Dutch politics, the Farmer-Citizen Movement (BoerBurgerBeweging, BBB) has called for a radical overhaul of the current asylum system, which it has argued has left villages throughout the Netherlands being “terrorised” by so-called refugees.

The BBB party also noted the strains put on the housing market, saying: “Newcomers to our country are no longer given priority for housing. It is inexplicable that a 30-year-old Dutch person cannot get a house, but someone who just comes here immediately gets a house.”

The party not only called for a hard cap of 15,000 asylum seekers per year but also called for the EU to adopt a similar scheme proposed by the UK, to send those applying for refuge to countries in Africa such as Tanzania, Malawi, Namibia or Senegal. It also criticised Brussels for failing to secure its external borders and for not deporting those who have no right to remain in Europe.

“Asylum seekers who have no right to stay in the Netherlands must return as soon as possible their country of origin. BBB is committed to good relations with the countries where these nationals reside have to go back to. Where countries really do not cooperate, there should be financial consequences.”

Perhaps most importantly, the populist party argued that Europe as a whole needs to develop an “African Strategy” to deal with the large influxes of economic migrants, which BBB said will likely only increase as the population of the continent is set for massive growth this century.

Drawing upon its roots as a pro-farmer organisation, the BBB argued that the Netherlands, which is home to some of the most productive agricultural systems in the world, could help teach African nations to develop the “intensive agriculture and livestock farming” methods that they will require to feed their populations and therefore reduce the number of people fleeing the continent out of poverty.

Elsewhere in its election manifesto, the Farmer-Citizen Movement declared that it will seek to end the “suffocating” nitrogen regulations inspired by the EU green agenda.

The outgoing government of Prime Minister Mark Rutte argued that it would be necessary to cut nitrogen emissions from livestock farms in half by the year 2030 in order to satisfy the EU’s Natura 2000 scheme, which mandates EU member-states to remove industry or farming from areas determined to be ecologically significant.

Rutte’s government, which fell earlier this year over a dispute on immigration policy, said that up to 30 per cent of all livestock farms may need to be shut down for good. To accomplish this, the globalist-minded government introduced a farmer buyout programme, which although initially will be voluntary, could become mandatory, with up to 3,000 farms facing permanent shut-down.

The BBB, which was born out of the tractor protest movement against the green agenda measures, argued that the EU Natura scheme is too disparate in its impact, and that instead of small areas of protection spread out across the country, larger areas should be designated, to not only increase efficiency in being able to protect such lands but also to reduce the impact on farmers and businesses.

The party also called for the EU to invest in manure-based fertilisers rather than just seeking to eliminate artificial nitrogen fertilisers without a suitable replacement. Finally, the party called for the bloc to establish “food protected areas”, arguing that food insecurity is already a growing problem throughout Europe and some areas should be protected in order to provide a base of food production.

The Netherlands, despite its relatively small size, is one of the largest food producers in the EU, with the LTO national farming lobbying group estimating that 94.5 billion euros in food were exported from the country in 2019. The restrictions on livestock farms threaten the country’s status as the largest exporter of meat in Europe and the fifth-largest dairy exporter in the world.

Although the Farmer–Citizen Movement (BBB) swept to victory in the Senate and local elections earlier this year — becoming the largest party in the country after previously holding zero seats — it is unlikely that they or indeed any single party will secure enough votes to win an outright governing majority. However, the party stands a good chance of entering government on a coalition basis from which it would have a large influence over government policy.

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2023/09/14/dutch-farmer-party-calls-for-asylum-seeker-cap-and-opt-out-of-eu-green-agenda-in-election-manifesto24943472/

French LGBTI Organization Calls For Gynecologist To Be Condemned After He Stated He Only Serves “Real Women”

An LGBTI rights organization in France is calling on the Minister of Equality to intervene in the case of a gynecologist who they are accusing of “transphobia.”

On September 8, SOS Homophobie, which describes itself as a “national association against LGBTIphobia” took to X (formerly Twitter) to condemn a gynecologist for stating he only provided services to females. The comment from Dr. Victor Acharian, who operates in the Pau region, was made in reply to a Google review he received in which a trans-identified male’s partner complained that Acharian refused to provide services to him.

“It was my trans partner’s first appointment. He refused to see her, his secretary threw us away coldly. I advise against [visiting]. Never again,” the review stated.

In response, Acharian replied directly.

“SIR, I am a gynecologist, and I take care of real women. I have no skills to take care of MEN, even if they have shaved their beards and come to tell my secretary that they [have] become women. My GYNECOLOGICAL examination table is not suitable for examining men. You have specialized and very competent services to take care of men like you,” Acharian wrote, emphasizing his text with capitalized letters. “Thank you for informing TRANS people to never come for consultation with me.”

While the review and response appear to now have been removed from Acharian’s Google widget, another existing review shows Acharian made a similar comment to another reviewer in 2021.

The reviewer, a local political activist using the name Tuncay CILGI, gave Acharian a 1-star review with no additional context.

Acharian responded: “Dear Sir. I do not know you. You cannot know me, since I am a gynecologist, and I only treat women. As for your political militancy, that does not concern me.”

In their X post on Acharian, SOS Homophobie wrote: “We denounce the transphobes and discriminatory remarks of gynecologist Victor Acharian in Pau. Transphobia is a reality with serious consequences, particularly in access to health. It affects the entire territory.” The organization also tagged Bérangère Couillard, France’s Minister of Equality between Women and Men and the Fight against Discrimination, in an apparent effort to have Acharian investigated.

SOS Homophobie‘s post has been met with widespread mockery on social media, with many female users coming to Acharian’s defense.

“Gynecologists are for women and women, without exception, have at least two XX chromosomes,” journalist Hala Oukili wrote.

“When I need new glasses, I make an appointment with a dermatologist,” another joked.

While Acharian appears to be standing firm in his clinic catering exclusively for females, recent debacles show that many fields in women’s healthcare are now attempting to include males.

In May, the Canadian Cancer Society drew criticism after maintaining a recommendation that men who claim to identify as women should undergo pap smears as part of a cervical cancer screening process.

On a webpage titled “As a trans woman, do I need to get screened for cervical cancer?” Canada’s largest national cancer charity provides advice for males who identify as transgender curious about receiving a cervical cancer screening.

According to the Mayo Clinic, cervical cancer is a type of cancer that occurs in the cells of the cervix. Various strains of the human papillomavirus, a sexually transmitted infection, play a role in causing most cervical cancer. Cervical cancer is detected through semi-regular screenings called Pap smears, in which a small brush is used to gently remove cells from the surface of the cervix so they can be tested.

“If you’re a trans woman, you may not have given much thought to Pap tests and cervical cancer. And if you haven’t, that makes a fair amount of sense. After all, in order to get cervical cancer, you need to have a cervix — that is, the organ that connects the vagina to the uterus,” the Cancer Society’s official website read.

It goes on to state that “trans women” who have “had bottom surgery to create a vagina and possibly a cervix” should talk to a medical professional to “figure out specific cancer-screening needs.”

https://reduxx.info/french-lgbti-organization-calls-for-gynecologist-to-be-condemned-after-he-stated-he-only-serves-real-women/