Month: July 2023
Welcome to the Islamic Republic of France – or is it Faraz?
by Giulio Meotti
These are the twenty most popular names among newborns, boys and girls. In Algeria? Tunisia? Egypt? Saudi Arabia? Iraq? Yemen? No, in the sixth largest department of France, Seine-Saint-Denis.
Muhammad
Adams
Ibrahim
Isaac
Rayan
Mousse
Imran
Amir
Ismaël
Aylan
Lina
Nour
Inaya
Aya
Fatima
Aicha
Mariam
Maryam
Fateumata
Sarah
Already today hundreds of territories are beyond the control of the Republic. The violence of recent days has proved it.
According to the DGSI, the French internal secret service, there are 150 enclaves. The former number two of the DGSI, Alain Chouet, speaks of “1,514 neighborhoods where access to the security forces, emergency, medical and social services is prohibited. They are in 859 cities and 4 million people live there, 6 percent of the total population”. The police can only intervene in force and for limited periods of time. Will the army one day have to occupy the suburbs militarily to restore order?
It’s already happening. On July 3, the Ouest-France newspaper published an interview with a soldier who, on condition of anonymity, confirmed his participation in operations against the violent, indicating the presence of about thirty colleagues who intend not to “let the country burn”.
It was 2018 when the then Minister of the Interior, Gérard Collomb, released this interview:
“What I read in the police notes every morning reflects a very pessimistic situation.”
What is the immigration responsibility?
“Huge”.
What is he afraid of? Partition? Secession?
“Yes, I think about it, that’s what worries me.”
How long until it’s too late?
“It is difficult to estimate, but I would say that, within five years, the situation could become irreversible”.
“Neighborhoods are definitely lost,” Le Point comments on this week’s fires. “A counterculture and a counter-civilization thrive there. The police aren’t the only ones missing. The very meaning that the State claims to give to citizens’ lives is called into question. Drug trafficking allows parallel economies to structure a parallel society. And it is thus that France could, in less time than we imagine, sink into a new kind of feudalism and the weakness of the state would be such that it would take nothing to effect a secession”.
Historian Pierre Vermeren describes last week’s fires as the revival of a “mini Algerian civil war”.
In France today 29.6 per cent of the population aged 0 to 4 is of non-European origin compared to 17.1 per cent aged 18 to 24 years, 18.8 percent from 40 to 44 years, 7.6 percent from 60-64 years and 3.1 percent over 80 years. This was revealed by Insee, the French Istat, which examines the last three generations. In practice, one in three Frenchmen of tomorrow will not be European. And considering that the fires were often started by fourth-generation immigrants, what to expect?
At the time of Emil Cioran these numbers were not yet the facts, but it didn’t stop the philosopher of Romanian origin from writing in 1987: “It is certain that in fifty years French society will have a completely different, even unimaginable appearance… I believe in example that Notre Dame will be a mosque. It is inevitable, with the wear and tear of Christianity. Do you know what happened at the end of the Roman Empire…”.
The faithful of the Prophet are already imposing the obligatory veil, the expulsion of the Jews, married life regulated according to Koranic principles. The next governments will have to accept the veil at school and at work, halal meat in all canteens. Practicing Christians will retain their rights, but will have to be “discreet”. Gradually, the tolling of bells from many areas will cease. 2,500 to 3,000 churches will disappear.
Jews will leave many cities, as has already happened to 90 percent of them throughout the Seine-Saint-Denis.
Let’s take Sarcelles. The Sephardi Jewish community – Tunisians and Moroccans – built a first synagogue in 1964 on rue Paul Valéry, which became the epicenter of the Jewish quarter nicknamed “little Jerusalem”. In the 1980s, the Assyro-Chaldean diaspora also chose Sarcelles as a refuge. Originally from Türkiye, they fled the anti-Christian massacres. The 8,000 Assyro-Chaldeans who arrived in waves created the largest Chaldean church in Europe, Saint-Thomas-Apôtre.
Today, writes L’Express, “the city of 60,000 inhabitants is divided into ethnic ghettos”. Former (leftist) mayor Francois Pupponi recently said: “The Great Replacement exists: today’s population is not the same as yesterday.” Halal tends to impose its hegemony. “‘I have to cross the city to buy a cutlet in the only butcher’s shop that sells it,’ grumbles this 50-year-old of Romanian origin. This Christian asked his son to remove the cross from his neck at school. ‘The bearded men come to teach the boys in front of schools, trying to recruit tomorrow’s soldiers”. “Since 2014-2015 we have seen a decrease in numbers in Jewish schools,” explains Sarah, 35, a Hebrew teacher at the Ozar Hatorah school”.
During last week’s violence, before sunset, Jonathan C. drew the curtains in his apartment in Sarcelles, so that no light was visible from outside. “I don’t want my flat to be seen from the street and targeted,” says Jonathan, a 40-year-old Jew. The road is in the hands of Islam.
And France has hundreds of Sarcelles. In one of the districts of the city of Nantes-la-Jolie, Val-Fourré, there are 80 percent Muslim inhabitants.
The reality has been recognized by all political leaders, even on the left. The penultimate premier Édouard Philippe said that “an insidious secession” was underway. The former interior minister, Bernard Cazeneuve, said he feared “a conflagration”.
There will not be, as in Submission by Michel Houellebecq, a wave of adherence to Islam, but more simply the religious minority will impose its rules by becoming the majority. As the imam of Nîmes, Hocine Drouiche said, already today “certain French politicians want to formalize the victory of political Islam”. “Islamism is perfectly rooted in French society, it has its institutions and its relays, its objectives are fixed,” Boualem Sansal adds to Le Figaro this week.
Emmanuel Macron’s victory did not make the problems that sunk the Socialist Party in 2017 disappear. They had simply been pushed aside. A territorial and political separation, de jure, would be impossible. Islam will then end up imposing a de facto separation and applying sharia in its everyday life, regulating marriage laws (which will legalize polygamy) and inheritance. They will no longer turn to French judges for disputes between Muslims, but to cadis. This system, already partly in force in England, would also involve schools and hospitals reserved for the Islamic faithful and therefore the creation of committees to manage them autonomously.
The veiled journalists will appear on the evening news. And fewer and fewer journalists will criticize Islam. Already today in France there are 120 personalities under guard for doing so.
The risk is that the latent civil war will turn into an open war of civilizations. And what better revolution than Islam to overthrow a society?
A Muslim prayer room opens every week in France, at the rate of 50 a year. The Ministry of the Interior estimated 150 in 1976, 900 in 1985, 1,555 in 2001 and so on in an infinite progression, up to 3,000 today. Dalil Boubakeur, rector of the Great Mosque of Paris, has called for the number of mosques in the country to double – to 4,000 – to meet demand. “Almost every two weeks a mosque is born in France and a church disappears,” he just said Edouard de Lamaze, president of the Observatoire du patrimoine religieux in Paris. “It is no longer just about reaching the 10,000 mosque milestone, which, at the current rate, will be reached around 2100; the public visibility of Islam must be evident, it must dominate” reads an investigation.
Secession is already taking place in the cities.
In the northern districts of Marseilles, such as in Roubaix, women do not need to be repressed: they know they are not welcome. In Sevran, entire territories wrested from the republican forces. At the Blanc-Mesnil in Saint-Denis, the bar near the mosque has given up on organizing the music festival, deemed “impure” by the neighbours. In Montpellier, a bar behind the station receives a weekly visit from a Muslim who makes sure he “doesn’t serve alcohol” to his “brothers”. In Marseille, in the Porte d’Aix district, a pizzeria does not sell alcohol.
There are rare earthquakes that can change a territory. What we have just seen in the “lost territories” of France is one of them. Perhaps one day they will change the name of France to Faraz.
Welcome to the Islamic Republic of France – or is it Faraz? | ערוץ 7 (israelnationalnews.com)
Germany: Five years imprisonment for rape of a boy in mosque
Almost four years after the horrific crime, the Oldenburg Regional Court has handed down a verdict. A man who raped a boy in a mosque was sentenced to five years in prison.
On Friday, after years of trial and thorough examination of the evidence and testimonies, the court handed down the sentence against the 32-year-old perpetrator. “The chamber was convinced by the boy’s statements,” said a spokeswoman for the regional court. A psychological evaluation of the young victim supported his credibility and contributed to the court’s conviction.
The crime took place in September 2019 in a mosque in Nordenham an der Weser (Wesermarsch district). According to the court’s findings, the accused used the sacred and supposedly safe place to carry out his heinous plan. The perpetrator and the then twelve-year-old victim visited the mosque, where the man forced the boy to have sex.
The accused’s defence had pleaded for acquittal, but the court followed the prosecution’s demand and imposed a five-year prison sentence. The verdict sends a clear message to society and to potential perpetrators: sexual violence, especially against children, will not be tolerated and perpetrators will be held accountable with the full force of the law.
Despite the final verdict, the emotional and psychological burden remains for the victim, who has been traumatised by the events and the trial. Experts emphasise the need to provide continuous psychological support and care to such victims to help them come to terms with the traumatic experiences and find a way to healing.
French riots show that decades of mass ‘colonizing immigration’ could lead to ‘collapse,’ says former head of French counter-intelligence agency
Pierre Brochand was head of France’s DGSE counter-intelligence agency from 2002 to 2008. Since 2019, he has made repeated calls for a radical change in his country’s immigration policy over what he says is the looming threat of civil war.
In a discussion about immigration on the public radio station France Culture last April, Brochand issued a warning which found its full expression in the week of violent rioting and looting that took hold of France after the shooting of a teenager of Algerian origin on June 27:
“If we do nothing or if we do little, we are going to head either towards a progressive implosion of social trust in France, that is to say towards a society where the quality of life will collapse and where it will be less and less pleasant to live, or, by successive explosions, towards confrontations that will make France a country where one will not be able to live at all.”
Now, in an interview published on July 6 on the website of Le Figaro daily newspaper, Brochand exposes, as Le Figaro puts it, “the deadly cocktail of a society of individuals b
The least that can be said is that the former counter-intelligence chief’s analysis stands in sharp contrast to Interior Minister Gérald Darmanin’s own analysis made in the National Assembly on July 5. According to Darmanin, the riots of the previous days are not linked to immigration as “only” 10 percent of the rioters were foreigners.
In Darmanin’s eyes, the non-White youth that caused mayhem on the streets of France for days, often invoking the Quran and the name of Allah, have no link to immigration as they are French citizens. The French minister contradicted himself, however, saying that as the average age of rioters was 17, they were born under the presidency of Jacques Chirac, and it is too late to control immigration anyway.
Sadly, this is a perfect illustration of Brochand’s pessimistic observation last April on France Culture, when he said he did not think there is currently enough courage among the French political class to do what is necessary to avoid the worst-case scenario: that of confrontation.
“Closing borders in the name of the precautionary principle – the Polish way – has never been seriously considered in our country,” Brochand said to Le Figaro after the recent rioting, which has seen over 700 members of security forces injured, some 4,000 arrested, and many towns and cities devastated. For Brochand, the reason is a mixture of humanism and economic interests, i.e. the need to import cheap labor.
Brochand says the changes that have led to the current decomposition of French society happened in the 1970s, when France made its transition from a modern national state to a society of individuals.
Together with the immigration of workers, France began to experience what increasingly became an immigration of settlers (Brochand uses the French term “immigration de peuplement”, which can also be translated as “colonizing immigration”). The transition to a society of individuals has created what he calls a scissor effect. Hence, in Brochand’s eyes, internal partition is the natural inclination of the multicultural societies of Western Europe.
This is not new, as Pierre Brochand said that he remembers when he was the French ambassador to Hungary in the years 1989-93, just after the fall of communism in that part of Europe, he would often hear from his Hungarian interlocutors: “We are lucky we can see first-hand the damage that non-European immigration is causing in your country, and we certainly don’t want to imitate you.”
“In everyone’s eyes, we are now the ‘sick man’ of the continent, the Security Council, the G7, and the G20,” laments the former head of France’s counter-intelligence, as France is indeed the country with the highest proportion of inhabitants with a non-European immigrant background, and immigration figures have been beating new historic records under President Emmanuel Macron.
Others, like in neighboring Italy where mass immigration began at the beginning of the 2010s when Berlusconi’s right-wing government was overthrown with the help of Brussels, Berlin, and Paris, know very well that what is happening in France now will likely happen in their country in a decade or two if nothing is done.
An illustration of such apprehension can be found, for example, in an article published on July 5 by the Italian conservative daily newspaper Il Giornale with the title: “The roots of France’s ill and the fear that looms over Italy.”
Meanwhile, a large majority of French people are strongly opposed to what increasingly appears to be a dangerous social engineering experiment by the liberal elites, something Éric Zemmour has called a Ribbentrop-Molotov pact between Western liberals and Islam against the White, heterosexual, Catholic French man. Indeed, 74 percent of French people now think there are too many immigrants in their country and 62 percent would want France to disobey EU treaties and EU law to stop immigration.
The latter is an important point, in particular in light of the ruling by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) against Switzerland that was delivered just a few days ago, which extends the right to family reunification even to refugees who have only obtained a temporary residence permit and not asylum. Let us not forget that EU member states have the obligation, as per the EU treaties, to abide by the rulings of the ECHR.
“When diasporas swell out of all proportion — with at least 5 million additional arrivals since 2005 — reaching a critical mass that makes them confusedly aware of their irresistible strength, when compromises and unilateral concessions become confessions of weakness calling for transgression, when these counter-societies have the audacity to set themselves up as competing sovereignties in the same ‘one and indivisible’ space, well, the pressure cooker’s lid blows off, as soon as the opportunity arises,” explains Brochand in his July 6 interview published in Le Figaro.
“It is worth pointing out, first of all, that isolated riots have been commonplace for 40 years, in every corner of the country, under the technocratic label of ‘urban violence,’” goes on the former DGSE director, noting things have evolved “to the point where no one pays any attention to them anymore, as if they were part of the landscape.”
According to Brochand, somewhere between 100,000 and 200,000 may have taken part in the urban violence, creating a situation much more dangerous than in 2005, when similar rioting took place in France’s suburbs. Nothing comparable had ever happened since the French Revolution of 1789, notes Brochand, and, this time, even provincial towns have been affected by the troubles alongside the centers of big cities, in contrast to what happened 18 years ago when most of the rioting was constricted to the so-called sensitive neighborhoods.
“I would describe the present catastrophe as an uprising or revolt against the French national state, by a significant proportion of the youth of non-European origin present on its territory,” says Brochand.
“Will we draw the right lessons from this, given that the country’s vital prognosis is at stake? Will we consider remedies other than yet another ‘plan for the suburbs?’ Things being what they are, I doubt it,” he concludes on a pessimistic note.
Brochand’s words echo those pronounced on the CNews French news channel on July 2 by Gendarmerie Colonel Philippe Cholous:
“We need to analyze this situation not in terms of what is happening now, which is terrible, but in terms of what could happen if it gets out of hand. There’s obviously anger in the suburbs, but I think there’s also anger among the middle classes, the good people, France’s working people. There’s also a great deal of resentment on the part of the forces of law and order, who are very often abandoned by politicians. (…) The level of exasperation and resentment, the level of violence, and above all, the fact that in certain areas there is a real hatred of France, with weapons circulating, means that the potential is explosive. And just because there are fewer vehicles burned or businesses attacked doesn’t mean that the potential risk is decreasing.”
It is worth noting that after a week of chaos, the French government has not renounced its plans to legalize the stay of hundreds of thousands of illegal migrants who work in sectors lacking labor, which is going to greatly reinforce the pull factor for illegal immigration to Europe, as each such legalization in a major European country has done in the past.
According to a July 7 poll for CNEWS television about which political leaders the French trust most to find solutions to the current situation in their country, published on July 7, where respondents were asked to give their first and second choice, 32 percent said they trust none, 27 percent pointed to Marine Le Pen, 22 percent to her party chairman Jordan Bardella, and only 20 percent to President Emmanuel Macron, and 13 percent to Éric Zemmour, who is depicted as being more to the right than Marine Le Pen.
Macron’s interior minister, Gérald Darmanin, came only fifth, as he is trusted by only 12 percent of respondents, whereas only 11 percent pointed to Prime Minister Elizabeth Borne as their first or second choice of someone who could bring solutions to the unfolding crisis. Interestingly enough, the leader of the center-right party Les Républicains, Éric Ciotti, with only 6 percent of the French who trust his ability to bring solutions, lags behind far-left leaders Jean-Luc Mélenchon (9 percent) and Fabien Roussel (8 percent).
Pakistan’s support for terrorist activities inside Bharat
Pakistan’s involvement in supporting and patronizing terrorist activities within Bharat is a matter of great concern. For decades, there has been evidence of Pakistan’s complicity in providing sanctuary, training, and financial support to various terrorist organizations that target Bharat. This article delves into the patterns of Pakistan’s patronage of terrorism and the implications it holds for regional security and stability.
State-sponsored terrorism
Pakistan has long been accused of harboring and supporting terrorist organizations that operate within Bharat. The most notorious among them is Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), responsible for the 2008 Mumbai attacks. Pakistan’s intelligence agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), has been implicated in providing training, arms, and logistical support to such groups. The evidence of state-sponsored terrorism includes intercepted communications, testimonies of captured terrorists, and the infiltration of militants across the Bharat-Pakistan border.
Proxy warfare and cross-border infiltration
Pakistan has employed proxy warfare as a strategy to destabilize Bharat. It supports and facilitates the infiltration of terrorists across the Line of Control (LoC) in Jammu and Kashmir, with the aim of fomenting unrest and undermining Bharat’s sovereignty. The infiltration routes are often facilitated by porous borders, covertly supported by elements within the Pakistani establishment. This tactic not only fuels violence but also hampers the peace process between India and Pakistan, impeding efforts to resolve the long-standing Kashmir issue.
Funding and material support
Pakistan has been accused of providing financial assistance and material support to terrorist organizations operating within Bharat. This includes the provision of funds for arms procurement, training camps, safe havens, and propaganda machinery. The funds often originate from state coffers or external sources, channeled through covert networks. By extending such support, Pakistan enables these groups to carry out attacks, spread fear, and disrupt peace and stability in Bharat.
Exploiting regional disparities and divisions
Pakistan’s patronage of terrorist activities in Bharat is also motivated by its desire to exploit regional disparities and divisions within the country. By targeting specific regions, communities, or religious groups, Pakistan aims to exacerbate existing fault lines, fuel communal tensions, and create internal strife. This not only undermines Bharat’s social fabric but also diverts attention and resources from developmental goals, impeding progress and growth.
Impact on regional security and stability
Pakistan’s support for terrorist activities within Bharat has broader regional security implications. Terrorist attacks orchestrated by these groups have claimed the lives of innocent civilians and security personnel, creating a sense of fear and insecurity. Moreover, the cross-border movement of terrorists and the smuggling of arms destabilize the entire South Asian region, hindering efforts towards peace and cooperation.
International condemnation and diplomatic fallout
Pakistan’s patronage of terrorism has drawn international condemnation and heightened tensions between Bharat and Pakistan. Various countries and global organizations have urged Pakistan to take concrete actions against terrorist groups operating from its soil. Diplomatic efforts to isolate and pressure Pakistan have been undertaken, including economic sanctions and downgrading of diplomatic ties. However, the issue remains unresolved, as Pakistan has failed to take decisive action against the perpetrators of terrorism.
In brief, Pakistan’s patronage of terrorist activities within Bharat is a grave concern that threatens regional security, stability, and peace. The evidence of state-sponsored terrorism, cross-border infiltration, and the provision of financial and material support cannot be ignored. It is imperative for the international community to exert pressure on Pakistan to dismantle the infrastructure of terrorism and hold the perpetrators accountable. Only through collective efforts and unwavering commitment to counter terrorism can Bharat, Pakistan, and the entire region hope to achieve lasting peace and stability.
ISI’s efforts to undermine Bharat’s economy
The Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), Pakistan’s primary intelligence agency, has been involved in nefarious activities aimed at destabilizing Bharat. Among its tactics, one of the most insidious is the circulation of counterfeit Bharatiya currency. This article sheds light on the ISI’s attempts to harm Bharat’s economy through the production and dissemination of counterfeit currency, and the consequences of this illicit activity.
The menace of counterfeit currency
Counterfeit currency poses a significant threat to any country’s economy. It undermines the integrity of the financial system, erodes public confidence in currency, and distorts economic transactions. Counterfeit notes are used to finance illegal activities, including terrorism, smuggling, and money laundering. Recognizing the severity of this threat, governments worldwide have implemented stringent measures to combat counterfeiting.
The ISI has been accused of being directly involved in the production and circulation of counterfeit Bharatiya currency. Reports suggest that the ISI uses its networks to print high-quality counterfeit notes, primarily in Pakistan and neighboring countries. These counterfeit currencies are then smuggled into Bharat through various channels, including cross-border routes and organized criminal networks.
The circulation of counterfeit Indian currency orchestrated by the ISI has detrimental effects on Bharat’s economy. The presence of counterfeit notes disrupts the financial system, leading to economic instability and loss of confidence in the currency. It hampers legitimate business transactions, affects trade and commerce, and burdens the banking sector with the responsibility of detecting and combating counterfeiting.
Furthermore, counterfeit currency is used to fund illegal activities within Bharat, including terrorism, smuggling, and organized crime. The proceeds from counterfeit notes often find their way into the hands of anti-Bharat elements, destabilizing the country’s security and impeding its development.
The Bharatiya government has implemented various measures to combat the circulation of counterfeit currency. These include the introduction of advanced security features in currency notes, enhanced surveillance and intelligence gathering, and public awareness campaigns to educate citizens about identifying counterfeit notes. Additionally, cooperation with international agencies and neighboring countries is crucial in curbing the production and smuggling of counterfeit currency.
However, tackling this menace presents several challenges. The sophisticated printing techniques employed by counterfeiters, coupled with their ability to adapt to security measures, make it difficult to detect and deter counterfeit currency operations. The cross-border nature of this crime also poses challenges, as effective coordination and cooperation among multiple agencies and countries are required to disrupt the networks involved.
The ISI’s involvement in the production and circulation of counterfeit Bharatiya currency is a grave concern that undermines the stability of Bharat’s economy and security. The proliferation of counterfeit notes affects legitimate economic activities, compromises the integrity of the financial system, and fuels illegal activities detrimental to national interests.
Combating this threat requires a multi-pronged approach, involving strengthened security features on currency notes, robust intelligence gathering, international cooperation, and public awareness campaigns. Additionally, efforts to address the root causes of counterfeit currency circulation, such as curbing terrorist financing and strengthening border security, are essential.By recognizing the severity of the ISI’s activities and implementing comprehensive measures, Bharat can mitigate the impact of counterfeit currency, safeguard its economy, and protect the welfare of its citizens. International collaboration and cooperation are equally vital to disrupt the networks involved and curb this menace that undermines not only Bharat’s economy but also regional security and stability.
https://hindupost.in/terrorism/pakistans-support-for-terrorist-activities-inside-bharat/
India: Islamic conversion racket run by doctors and engineers busted by the police
An engineering and medical professional-led Islamic religious conversion gang was discovered by Ghaziabad’s Khoda police station. Neeru Bisht, a resident of Khoda, is one of the six individuals in the Delhi-National Capital Region (NCR) who fell victim to their nefarious agenda. The family noticed her donning the hijab and performing Namaz at home and the entire matter came to light.
The police reportedly tracked down the syndicate on 8 July on the basis of her father’s complaint. They apprehended their leader, Dr Abdullah Ahmed, his associate Mohammad Museer who is an engineer by profession and a call centre employee named Rahil. Interestingly, Rahil and Abdullah who were both Hindus had also undergone religious conversion. The former was previously named Rahul Agarwal whereas the latter was known as Saurabh Khurana.
According to Deputy Commissioner Of Police (Trans Hindo) Vivek Yadav, they brainwashed Neeru as well as five other persons from Delhi to embrace Islam. Ajay Rathore, Amrit Singh and Kapil Anand were converted by Abdullah while Ajay, to whom Museer had formerly imparted mathematical lessons as a tutor, was similarly influenced by the latter.
Even Rahul Agarwal alias Rahil, a resident of Sangam Vihar in Delhi, was converted by Museer and given the Muslim name by him. The former married Neeru after meeting her online and converted her to Islam. He is presently employed by I Energizer, a call centre in Noida’s Sector-58 where she had also worked formerly.
Abdullah, who lives in R New Colony in Palwal, is enrolled in a madrasa in Deoband to study Alim (God in Islam). He completed his BDS (Bachelor of Dental Surgery) at Aligarh Muslim University in 2014 and changed his religion in the same year. Museer, a Sangam Vihar inhabitant in Delhi, has a diploma in civil engineering and is currently pursuing a B.Tech (Bachelor of Technology).
According to the police, the wires of this racket are also connected to Aligarh and Deoband. The accused’s mobile devices contained videos of Maulanas from both of these locations. The material was used for religious conversion. Additionally, clips of controversial religious leader Zakir Naik were also found on them.
Neeru wanted to become a suicide bomber
Rahil approached the girl using his original name Rahul Agarwal. He convinced her that he was madly in love with her and that he could not survive without her. He told her that he wanted to marry her on multiple occasions.
In January of this year, he revealed his true identity to her in the belief that she had grown intense feelings for him. He pretended to be the victim in front of her and complained that his parents were against their union because they were from different religions. She accepted when he pressed her to become a Muslim.
Neeru’s father informed that he had begun to suspect his daughter due to her persistent unusual behaviours. She confessed to learning Sharia, the Islamic code of law, when he questioned her. He revealed that she was brainwashed to the point that she began observing Islamic customs, such as five times performing Namaz and adorning a burqa.
He disclosed that his daughter had grown so radicalised that she wouldn’t even hesitate to kill someone who disagreed with her religious ideology and refused to convert to Islam. He further added that she had become so fervent in her beliefs that she even expressed a desire to carry out a suicide bombing and attain ‘martyrdom’ for the sake of jihad.
In order to stop Rahil aka Rahul Agarwal from continuing on the path of terrorism, the father denounced him to the police. As a result, the Ghaziabad police held the offender and began an investigation.
Converting unsuspecting Hindu girls since 2017
Rahil has been carrying out his evil project to convert Hindu females to the Sharia since 2017. He initially became friends with his prey by assuming the identity of Rahul Agarwal, his Hindu name before he embraced Islam. Afterwards, he used his charisma to seduce the victims and get them involved in a relationship. He later indoctrinated them in the name of Islam after they developed feelings for him. He then indoctrinated the girls before finally manipulating them to convert to Islam.
Conversion through Fortnight
Notably, Ghaziabad police exposed a case of converting children to Islam using the video game “Fortnite.” The police described the nefarious strategy used by Islamists to persuade and coerce impressionable young minds to become Muslims through online games. The authorities verified that four teens who were converted via an online gaming application were instructed to read Quranic passages in order to win.
Following the filing of a First Information Report under the pertinent provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), a team was assembled to look into the matter. A Maulavi in Ghaziabad was arrested first, before one Shahnawaz Khan.
https://www.opindia.com/2023/07/islamic-conversion-racket-exposed-by-the-police-in-up-details/
Yemen: Islamist group ‘Houthis’ ban imports from Sweden after man burns Quran outside masjid on Eid
Days after an Iraqi refugee named Salwan Momika stomped on a copy of the Quran and set another on fire outside a mosque in Stockholm on the occasion of Eid-al-Adha, the Houthi movement in Yemen has banned imports from Sweden.
Houthi-run TV channel Al Masirah quoted the trade Minister as saying, “Yemen is the first Islamic country to ban imports of Swedish goods after its violations and desecration of Muslims’ holiest.”
He called upon other Islamic nations to ban imports from the Scandinavian country. The Houthi trade Minister also said that imports from Sweden were limited and that the ban had a symbolic value. He also said that it was the least thing that they could do to protest against the burning of Quran.
Who are the Houthis
The Houthi movement (also called Ansar Allah) is an Islamist movement comprising Zaydi Shiites from the Houthi tribe. Iran has been accused of providing military support to Houthis and using them as its proxy for shared geopolitical interests.
They control the Northern part of Yemen, including the cities of Sa’dah and Sana’a, and fight the coalition of Gulf countries led by Saudi Arabia.
Interestingly, the radical Islamist Houthi movement was designated as a terrorist group by Donald Trump prior to leaving the Oval Office. The decision was, however, reversed after Joe Biden became the US President.
The Quran burning incident in Sweden
Prior to Eid-Al-Adha, on June 28, the Swedish Police gave one Salwan Momika permission to burn the Quran at a demonstration outside the largest mosque in Stockholm after a Swedish court struck down the police’s ban on Quran-burning demonstrations.
Two other requests, one by a private citizen and the other by an organisation, for similar activities that include Quran burning were turned down by police in February outside the Turkish and Iraqi embassies in Stockholm.
The appeals court concluded in June that the protests should have been permitted. It ruled, “The order and security problems that the police had cited had not been clearly connected to the planned event or its immediate vicinity.”
Before this, Danish far-right politician Rasmus Paludan burnt a copy of the Quran next to the Turkish embassy in the country’s capital prompting Turkey to halt discussions with Sweden about its NATO membership in January this year.
https://www.opindia.com/2023/07/yemen-houthis-ban-imports-sweden-quran-burning-incident/
Where does that canard about Nazis being ‘right-wing’ come from?
By D. Parker
Socialists tarring their leftist rivals as ‘far right’ is the origin of the Nazis are “right-wing” lie
Factions of the far left have always labeled their leftist rivals as “far-right” to discredit them, thus creating the ‘fascism is far-right’ lie that conservatives have to put up with.
Have you ever wondered how the far left can make the absurd claim that people favoring liberty and limited government would be on the same side as a cadre of authoritarian collectivists with a completely opposite viewpoint?
Why does the far left keep repeating this ridiculous asseveration without ever definitively proving it?
Why have they created cultural taboos that bar the pro-freedom right from mentioning the issue, while they feel free to spew their Nazi and fascist projections whenever they want? And why are they so obsessed with this when according to their words, they have nothing to do with it?
So, let’s start from the beginning, what is the source of the far left’s ridiculous assertion that some factions of the far left are somehow ‘far-right’?
The answer is quite simple, totalitarians tend to compete with each other in wanting to control people and they see their fellow leftists as rivals in asserting this desire.
One group of collectivist authoritarians saw other authoritarians getting in the way of their grandiose plans of setting up a “Worker’s paradise.” They cloaked their socialist national agenda in patronizing language about a classless society of equality for all.
Thus, one group of collectivists will take control with a base ideology dredged up from Marx and the concepts he gleaned from ancient Greece and Sir Thomas More. While others who reject Marx are considered blasphemers by the first group.
Whichever one ends up at the top of the pyramid of corpses (in the words of George Orwell) crowns themselves as the penultimate leftist. Since the winners write the history books, they place themselves in the ‘hero’ position on the far left of the political spectrum. While relegating the losing leftists in the battle to the ‘far-right’ as the ultimate ideological insult.
Most of you of the pro-freedom right intuitively knew this was the case. And in our research on the Startling and Uncomfortable Ways the Democrat Party Emulates the Nazi Party (Yes, we’re going to get back on that horse soon enough), we found an academic paper that confirms our suspicions and gives everyone a roadmap for further research in finally being able to obliterate one of the left’s biggest – and oldest– lies. From Research Gate: How and Why Fascism and Nazism Became the “Right“
While it is a little bit of a dry, academic nature – being an academic paper after all – and while we may disagree in his terminology that may tend to confuse the issue. We enthusiastically encourage you to read the full text of the paper, download the PDF, share, and write about it if you can.
It starts by answering the basic question of how and why collectivist fascism and National Socialism (Nazism) somehow became known as belonging on the “right,” but it gets even better than that. It obliterates most of the far left’s “arguments” on the subject (if you can dignify stating something is a fact while utterly failing to prove it, an argument).
You might even want to share it with some of our collectivist comrades of the fascist far-left. You never know, they might learn something, they certainly aren’t getting any proper information from the nation’s socialist media. They might even see the wisdom of the pro-freedom right, once they realize that they are currently on the side of history with Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao, Hitler, Castro, Mussolini, and Lenin.
There are several prime examples in the paper that shows the left’s big lie can be sourced to the beginning of the last century, well over 100 years. The documentation shows that it comes from multiple sources. It should go without saying this took place well before WWII and other events.
Our first example cites Vladimir Lenin:
Meanwhile, the Marxist flag was raised by the revolutionaries in the Russian Empire. Right away, Vladimir Lenin declared that the Marxist movement was undergoing “revisionism from the right,” and thus explicitly pushed reformists to the right wing of the Left. He accused them of the most awful wickedness—betrayal of the proletariats’ primary interests by seeking cooperation with the bourgeoisie within the walls of parliaments. Lenin notably labeled reformists proponents of the petty bourgeoisie (Lenin, V. I. 1973a. “Marxism and Revisionism.” In Lenin’s Collected Works, vol. 15, 29–39. Moscow: Progress Publishers.)
The next example cites the Bolshevik Revolution of October 25, 1917, the Entente intervention in October 1922, over 100 years ago, and the rift between the ‘social chauvinists’ and Bolsheviks:
Thus, the Bolsheviks actively strengthened the far-left flank of socialists and led an offensive against more numerous socialist factions. The Bolsheviks’ propaganda firmly established Marxism-Leninism as a valid and indisputable continuation of Marx’s theory. They proudly occupied the far left wing of the political spectrum, shifting all others to the right.
Even worse, these leftists that were shifted to the right were repressed, exiled, or executed:
The Bolsheviks intended to rule alone and did not hesitate to eliminate all other parties and factions that did not share their perspective. Thus, the representatives of other leftist parties and party groups—Mensheviks, Constitutional Democrats (Kadets), Socialist Revolutionaries (SR), anarchists— were repressed, exiled, or executed in the course of the Bolsheviks’ power grab.
So much for the “Nazis went after Communists, so they couldn’t possibly be leftists lie.”
We previously asked those questions to make a point. Leftists keep on pushing what is a 100-year-old lie because one of the points raised in the paper:
Nevertheless, in modern political science, Fascists and National Socialists are considered the Far Right. The Left is working hard to keep this myth alive. Exposing this would lead Western left-wing intellectuals into a state of acute cognitive dissonance. They would find that leftist ideology continuously breeds existential evil, which is not alien to the large-scale genocide of the dissident population. Thus, they prefer to completely deny the fact that fascism and Nazism were left-wing phenomena.
Their belief system doesn’t make any sense, but they can’t let themselves realize they are on the mass murder side of history. Their big lie helps them pretend that somehow others are ‘guilty’ as well. They also must be very selective in how they defend their big lie, but we’ll have to talk about that some other time.
BBC Accused of Child Sex Abuse ‘Cover Up’ for Top Presenter Who Allegedly Paid Teenager For Explicit Pics
The BBC has come under fire after reports emerged alleging that a “well-known” presenter remained on air despite being accused of paying a teenager over £35,000 for sexually explicit pictures, leading some to question if the BBC bosses attempted to cover up another child sex scandal at the broadcaster.
A report from The Sun, Britain’s most circulated newspaper, has claimed that a 17-year-old was propositioned by a prominent BBC presenter — whose name is so far being withheld from the public — to send sexually charged photographs in exchange for money that was later used to fund a crack cocaine drug addiction, prompting the family to file a complaint with the broadcaster.
The alleged victim, who is now 20 years of age, transformed from a “happy-go-lucky youngster to a ghost-like crack addict” over the past three years, according to the mother.
Referring to the BBC star, the mother said: “When I see him on telly, I feel sick. I blame this BBC man for destroying my child’s life. Taking my child’s innocence and handing over the money for crack cocaine that could kill my child.”
“There were huge sums, hundreds, or thousands of pounds at a time. One time he had sent £5,000 in one lump. The money had been in exchange for sexually explicit photographs of my child,” she added.
The unnamed presenter could face charges of sexual exploitation under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 as well as violations of the Protection of Children Act 1978, which made it an offence to ask someone under the age of 18 to send a sexually explicit image of themselves.
Following the publication of the story, the BBC said that the male presenter would not appear on air in the coming days. However, questions are being raised as to why the presenter was not immediately suspended when the family initially informed the broadcaster of the allegations in May. It has also been reported by the Mirror that the presenter in question partied with BBC executive weeks after the allegations were made.
The BBC’s own culture editor Katie Razzall said that the fact that the presenter remained on air after the claims emerged “leads to questions about what steps the Corporation took after the complaint.”
Former Culture Secretary Nadine Dories said: “No place to hide for broadcasters who attempt to cover up this sort of behaviour. Lives are ruined, that’s what matters not damage limitation and brand protection. The public pay for the BBC, they have a right to know who this is, what happened and action taken.”
The prosecutor who led the Rochdale child rape grooming gang case, Nazir Afzal said per The Times that he was “surprised that this person was not suspended once they became aware of the gravity of the allegation”.
“The police should have been engaged as soon as they worked out whether the complaint was genuine. Where are we now — the middle of July? Six, seven weeks on. They should have advised the police that this is a matter that they should be investigating, and that should have been done weeks ago. There’s no justification for the police not having become involved as early as possible.”
The BBC has previously come under criticism for allegedly covering up the sexual abuse of children. In 2012, an independent review by Dame Janet Smith commissioned by the BBC found that a “culture of fear” enabled longtime television presenter Jimmy Savile to sexually abuse dozens of people, mostly children, while in the employ of the broadcaster between 1964 and 2007.
The report found that over 700 people from the BBC had heard rumours about Savile abusing children, yet no action was taken, and the presenter died without ever facing justice in 2011. Police later confirmed some 450 sexual abuse victims of the former BBC star, 80 per cent of whom were children or young people, mostly girls.
Responding to the latest allegations, a BBC spokesman said: “We treat any allegations very seriously and we have processes in place to proactively deal with them. As part of that, if we receive information that requires further investigation or examination we will take steps to do this.
“That includes actively attempting to speak to those who have contacted us in order to seek further detail and understanding of the situation. If we get no reply to our attempts or receive no further contact that can limit our ability to progress things but it does not mean our inquiries stop.
“If, at any point, new information comes to light or is provided — including via newspapers — this will be acted upon appropriately, in line with internal processes.”
French President Blames ‘Video Games’ Instead of ‘Islam’ for Riots – “The video games that have intoxicated them”
While I don’t think modern digital entertainment is especially healthy, national leaders blaming movies and games instead of dealing Islamic violence is even less mentally healthy.
Here’s France’s President Macron trying hard not to talk about the thing you’re not supposed to address.
President Emmanuel Macron has mostly blamed social media for the devastation, but he has also claimed that video games have inspired copycat violence and vandalism.
“It sometimes feels like some of them are experiencing, on the streets, the video games that have intoxicated them,” Macron said in a press conference on July 1.
There were massive riots in France long before video games and while feedback cycles of simulated violence are probably not doing anything helpful for the minds of France’s youth, the bigger problem is that the youth increasingly consists of North African Muslims who have no investment in the country, a great deal of hostility to it and every reason to act out their version of the BLM riots.
Social media is playing a role here, but talking about the digital element ignores the real issue. Much like the arguments that video games caused school shootings, the vast majority of kids playing games don’t shoot up schools, and those who do have specific motives. Entertainment is rarely a motive, it may just occasionally suggest a means. Macron wants to talk about the adrenaline high rather than the underlying hatred.
Islam does not need video games to inspire violence in its followers and the clash of civilizations in France is not just a misfiring reptile brain. Everything else is a distraction from that simple reality.
https://www.frontpagemag.com/french-president-blames-video-games-instead-of-islam-for-riots/