India: Child rights activist says same-sex marriage denies kids one parent’s love

As India is on the cusp of legalising same-sex unions, men rights activist, fighting for shared parenting in case of divorce or separation, said the law is a violation of natural law and will have a negative impact on societal values “if they go for children through surrogacy or adoption”.

Kumar V. Jahgirdar, founder and president of the Child Rights Initiative for Shared Parenting (CRISP), told IANS, “It is natural for any child to have a natural father and mother. We have the proposed law which is heading to the creation of a fatherless or motherless society”.

He said in this case one person will behave or act as though “he or she is a father or mother respectively.”

“The child raised by a same-sex couple is deprived of at least one parent, this is a human rights violation that the same-sex marriage movement will never address.

“This will have a devastating effect on the psychology of the child and is also a violation of child rights as per a UN convention to have two different genders as parents. It is set to become a fashion to speak about LGBTQ rights and nobody is bothered about child rights. The child rights and same sex rights can’t go in the same boat. I hope the apex court takes this seriously and does not hamper child fundamental rights,” Jahgirdar told IANS in an interview.

Advocating that a child needs the care and affection of both biological parents and grandparents, he said, “The children in same-sex marriage may feel a stigma that may end in drugs or school dropouts or land up in jail as a teenager.

“This law will be unconstitutional, and is not only against Indian social and cultural values but also in violation of basic human rights.

“Our demand, on behalf of children, is basically pro-family reforms. They are voiceless victims and their rights are directly connected with both biological parents.”

According to CRISP estimates, more than 25,000 divorce cases are pending in family courts in Bengaluru alone. In the country, the figure totals over 500,000.

The parents of the estranged couples have their own woes.

Bengaluru-based Jahgirdar’s NGO has also been demanding a separate union ministry for children and to de-link from the existing Ministry of Women and Child Development since the objectives of both women and children are different.

It is seeking an end to discrimination between maternal grandparents and paternal grandparents and has demanded that family courts treat both equally.

He said legalizing same sex marriage would add more confusion since the Domestic Violence Act is meant to protect women against men. “Now what happens to a gay marriage and stigma their child suffers from its peers.”

Jahgirdar said the law should not be made in haste and not by engaging in a discussion with various stakeholders, including men’s and women’s rights groups.

Also, he said, the law, if brought, should clarify about the custody of children in post-separation cases and what would happen to the children if the mother vanishes with the money received post-divorce and does not take care of the children.

The custody of children and shared parenting in cases of separation must be ensured, he added.

CRISP, with regional chapters in Chandigarh, Chennai, Hyderabad, Mumbai, Delhi and Lucknow, has also been demanding setting up of special courts to deal with child custody cases in case of biological parenting.

https://hindupost.in/society-culture/child-rights-activist-says-same-sex-marriage-denies-kids-one-parents-love/

Leicester violence fame Majid Freeman tweets 2021 Ghaziabad fake hate crime incident, which was shared by Mohd Zubair, to defame India & Hindus

Majid Freeman shares Ghaziabad fake hate crime incident to defame India

Islamist Majid Freeman, infamous for fanning the anti-Hindu violence in the United Kingdom’s Leicester earlier last year, on Monday, April 24, took to Twitter to share a video of miscreants assaulting an elderly Muslim man and shaving his beard off.

Freeman, a fundamentalist and an Islamic supremacist at heart, claimed that the incident took place in India’s Uttar Pradesh, where a ‘Hindutva’ mob lynched an elderly man and subjected him to a brutal attack before cutting his beard off with scissors. “This everyday cowardly Hindutva extremism against Muslims & minorities needs to be stopped,” he tweeted.

A cursory glance at the video reveals that the incident is of the 2021 Ghaziabad fake hate crime, a video of which had gone viral on social media that year after Alt News co-founder Mohammed Zubair manipulated a muted version of the same, claiming that the elderly Muslim man was subjected to assault after he refused to chant ‘Jai Shri Ram’.

After being called out over the fake video, Freeman doubled down on his twisted narrative, claiming that though the video is from June 2021, the further details are even more horrifying.

Ghaziabad fake hate crime: How Mohammed Zubair, Saba Naqvi, and others gave communal colour to a petty quarrel

On 14 June 2021, Alt News co-founder Mohammed Zubair took to Twitter to claim that an elderly Muslim man, Abdul Samad Saifi, in Ghaziabad was assaulted and forced to chant ‘Jai Shri Ram’. The incident took place in Loni in Ghaziabad in Uttar Pradesh.

Zubair tweeted, “An elderly man, Sufi Abdul Samad Saifi was attacked by five goons in Loni, Ghaziabad. He was threatened at the gunpoint, beaten, assaulted, and they forcefully chopped off his beard.” In a video shared by the ‘fact-checker, the victim could be seen being thrashed with sticks by the culprit. His beard was also cut forcibly using a scissor.

However, the police promptly punctured the claims made by Zubair and his supporters. In a tweet, Ghaziabad police informed that three accused had been arrested in the case. According to the police, the incident took place about 10 days ago on June 5, 2021. The victim Abdul Samad Saifi had travelled to the Loni border from Bulandshahr, where he was escorted to the house of accused Parvesh Gujjar in Banthala in Loni. After some time, the co-accused, namely, Kallu, Poli, Arif, and Adil aka Mushahid arrived at Parvez’s house and began thrashing the victim.

The victim Saifi sold amulets for a living. According to the police, the accused were miffed after the amulet proved harmful to them. Unlike what Zubair had alleged, the police said that the elderly man knew the culprits for a long time. Reportedly, Saifi had sold his amulets to several people in the village through the accused. The police had initially arrested Parvez while Adil and Kallu were nabbed on Monday (June 14). A case was registered against them under relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

In his confession, Parvez admitted to hitting Abdul Saifi, stating that he was angry as he felt that the tabeez (occult amulet) given to him by Saifi had backfired and he lost his unborn child because of it. However, several propagandists, including Saba Naqvi, Rana Ayyub, and Alt News’ Mohammed Zubair, etc. gave a communal spin to the incident, alleging that Saifi was assaulted for his refusal to chant ‘Jai Shri Ram’.

Nevertheless, Majid sharing the video and later, brazening out his stance, demonstrates how propaganda peddled by the likes of Mohammed Zubair, who was later involved in dog-whistling Islamists against former BJP leader Nupur Sharma and mobilising the Sar Tan Se Juda gang, is lapped up by his ideological brethren halfway around the world in their collective attempt to propagate Hinduphobia.

How Majid Freeman consistently peddled lies to instigate attacks against Hindus during Leicester violence

In August 2022, Leicester was convulsed with riots after Muslim mobs went on a rampage against the Hindu community. Violence erupted after a spate of targeted attacks on Hindus followed the Asia Cup India-Pakistan cricket match on August 28, when armed Islamists attacked Hindus and their residences in the vicinity.

Hundreds of Hindus had taken to the streets of Leicester to protest against the earlier violence by Muslims against Hindus in the area. During the protest by Hindus, the Muslim mob started indiscriminately attacking Hindus with stones and glass bottles. The protest by Hindus was disrupted by Islamists as they hurled glass bottles at the protestors. A Saffron flag was also desecrated by a mob of Islamists in front of the police.

Majid Freeman was one among the Islamists at the forefront of instigating the violence against Hindus. Freeman, a local Leicester Muslim “activist” who is known to harbour problematic and extremist Islamic views, spearheaded a fake news campaign during the Leicester violence to instigate the Islamists to continue attacking Hindus.

Majid lied about Quran being desecrated in Leicester, insinuating that the Hindus had committed this act. However, OpIndia tried to verify these claims. There is one video about this supposed Quran desecration where 2 men and 1 woman are seen collecting torn pages of the Quran from the street. There is no video evidence of the Quran being desecrated. Moreover, there has been no complaint filed by the police and no video evidence submitted for investigation either. 

There was another incident that was cited by Majid Freeman to claim that Hindus had been attacking Muslims. He claimed that a mob of 30+ Hindus had chased and assaulted a Muslim teenager. When confirmed, it turned out that while the Muslim organisations had claimed this, no video evidence was submitted to the police and no investigation was underway, OpIndia was told by Insight UK.

On the 4th of September, when the violence against Hindus started with mobs hunting them down in their houses and on the streets, Majid Freeman took to Twitter to dog-whistle against Hindus again.

From the 4th to the 7th of September, Muslim mobs went on a rampage against Hindus. On the 4th of September, when Majid tweeted and dog-whistled, the Muslim mob went on a rampage unprovoked while the Hindus were celebrating Ganesh Chaturthi. Eggs were thrown when Hindu symbols were spotted and where Ganesh puja was being held. A Hindu man was dragged out of his home and stabbed when his aunt ran out of the house to defend him, she was injured because the Muslim mob punched and beat her.

On the 8th of September, he repeated the lie that a Muslim boy was attacked by 30+ Hindus, and his evidence to back that claim was an unverifiable video and the fact that he wanted people to trust his word. As mentioned before, there is no investigation into this because there was no evidence provided. 

Even after the violence that was perpetrated on the 4, 5, 6 and 7th of September, Majid continued to lie. He claimed on the 9th of September that a Muslim boy was held by Hindus and asked for his religion. When they found out he was a Muslim, they tried to beat him, however, the Muslim boy managed to escape after beating the Hindus up. The Leicester police responded to Majid saying that such an incident had not happened.

https://www.opindia.com/2023/04/leicester-violence-fame-majid-freeman-tweets-2021-ghaziabad-fake-hate-crime-incident-to-defame-india-hindus/

A BBC instruction manual for kids to propagandize their parents

By Rajan Laad

The day before yesterday, the BBC carried a piece titled “Earth Day: How to talk to your parents about climate change.”

The article begins addressing their target underaged readers:

You want to go vegan to help the planet, but you’re not paying for the shopping. You think trains are better than planes, but your dad books the summer holiday.

Young people are some of the world’s most powerful climate leaders and want rapid action to tackle the problem.

Big changes are difficult, especially when they involve other people. Where do you begin? For this year’s Earth Day, we spoke to people who have successfully had tricky climate chats at home. Here are their top tips:

The piece is broken into three sections targeting what they imply are evils of our times.

The first section focuses on “How to talk about going meat-free.”

The section begins by claiming that “eating less meat is one of the best ways to reduce our impact on the planet, say scientists.”

The piece introduces us to 17-year-old Ilse who has dyed her hair bright red, and her parents, Antonia and Sally.

The BBC claims that the family ate meat twice or even thrice a day, but when Ilse was 13, she “decided to do more about climate change and read that cutting out meat was a good start.”

Sally and Antonia were understandably skeptical about the plan initially. They were concerned about not getting enough protein and the fact that Ilse was too young to make that decision.

But they still complied with Ilse’s wishes and began with a one-day-a-week trial, they proceeded to scale up, and after a year, went totally meat-free.

Sally says that seeing the emotional impact of the topic on her daughter helped to persuade her it was the right thing for her family.

The BBC reveals that Ilse is part of ‘Teach the Parent’, a U.K.-based campaign that “encourages these conversations between generations.”

The group was started by young people “frustrated with the lack of international climate action and their feelings of powerlessness.”

Ilse advises her fellow youths that even if the first conversation with adults goes badly, they should keep trying. “Big lifestyle changes take time. If you bring it up every so often, it shapes people’s attitudes in the long term.”

The next section targeting traveling begins as follows:

“How we travel is a major source of carbon emissions, but switching from driving or flying can potentially limit family holidays and cost more.

The piece introduces us to Phoebe L Hanson, a 21-year-old student who persuaded her family to holiday in the U.K. instead of flying abroad.

Much like Ilse, the BBC treats Phoebe as an expert. 

Phoebe recommends using fear tactics and emotional blackmail.

“Say something like, ‘I’m really scared about my future, these are the reasons I want to do something.”

Present a solution, not just a problem, Phoebe explains. “Give them options for something fun or exciting.”

She also says one answer to concerns about money is to discuss what type of world parents want children to inherit.

Finally, the piece focuses on “how to talk about being waste-free.”

We are introduced to young Becky Little who convinced her parents Rob and Ellen to reduce food waste and think more carefully about what they buy.

Becky has the following advice:

“Be well-informed about the things you want your family to start changing so they can see you care and have done some research.”

 “Explain why it will make their lives easier or cheaper.” 

“Make connections with things they care about.” 

The BBC reveals that Becky’s family likes to “volunteer so they made meals using leftover food to donate to people in their local community.”

“It’s important to not go into it expecting them to change their whole lives. Small things can make a difference,” Becky explains.

The condescending, sanctimonious, and insolent attitude of these petulant children and their assumption of superiority over the very adults who brought them into this world is revolving

What is astounding is that neither the author nor anyone at the BBC’s editorial team seems to grasp how ludicrous they appear carrying claims and ‘advise’ from pompous, arrogant, and self-righteous amateurs.

This piece is totally, utterly, and completely preposterous, it reads like a parody piece, yet the publishers seem totally unaware of it.

Most families happily change their habits when they become parents. Parents refrain from foul language, lying, and demonstration of anger before their children. Most parents conceal their problems before their young children. Most parents change their T.V. and movie viewing habits for their children. This is perfectly natural because the goal is to give the child a loving and stable environment.

But that doesn’t mean parents capitulate before every ridiculous whim made by their child. There is a difference between loving an individual and spoiling an individual. An important part of parenting is instilling values and discipline, which may occasionally require some strictness and remaining steadfast in the fact of petulance. 

Totalitarian regimes have always exploited young children to push their agenda. They know that children are impressionable and with some effort can be brainwashed. These regimes know that most parents, out of love and concern for their children usually surrender to their children’s demands and whims. Greta Thunberg was elevated for that very reason and they did have some success, the state is using its power to create many more Gretas. They know that anybody challenging the ridiculous demands of these children can be branded as cruel.

What is amazing is this is occurring in a democracy such as the U.K.

The state via its mouthpieces such as the BBC is attempting to exploit children to further their cause – control the lives of citizens 

It is also important to state every sane individual wants a clean environment and surroundings because it is essential for good health. What is not welcomed is the regime trying to interfere in people’s personal spaces or exploit children to push their agenda. It is also insulting for citizens when the regime assumes they know better than the very citizens who gave them the power.

What is also troubling is the dual standards.

The BBC, will never ever carry a piece advising world leaders or climate ‘activists’ to abandon travels, summits, and conclaves and replace them with video conference calls to reduce their carbon footprint.

Instead, the state is expecting regular people to make compromises.

This hypocrisy is consistent:

Gun control for you, armed bodyguards for them. 

Defund the police for you, barricades and police protection for them.

Open borders for you while their homes are surrounded by impregnable walls.

No plane travel for you, private jets for them.

There is a chasm of difference between what they believe, what they say, what they mean, and ultimately what they do.

P.S.:

George Orwell wrote the following in his masterful 1984, it is quite astonishing how much he understood totalitarian regimes and their relationship with children.

Nearly all children nowadays were horrible. What was worst of all was that by means of such organizations as the Spies they were systematically turned into ungovernable little savages, and yet this produced in them no tendency whatever to rebel against the discipline of the Party. On the contrary, they adored the Party and everything connected with it… 

All their ferocity was turned outwards, against the enemies of the State, against foreigners, traitors, saboteurs, thought-criminals. It was almost normal for people over thirty to be frightened of their own children.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2023/04/a_bbc_instruction_manual_for_kids_to_propagandize_their_parents.html

France: Two migrants rob suitcases from young girl with cancer outside oncology ward

Two migrants, one from Libya and the other from Morocco, robbed two cars outside a cancer ward in the French city of Lyon. One of the cars belonged to a young girl scheduled to be hospitalized with cancer.

The two thieves, Hamza and Mohamed, stole bags belonging to the girl and her family from a parked car outside the Léon-Bérard hospital in the 8th arrondissement.

“We didn’t know what was in the cars, we made a mistake,” said Mohamed and Hamza, aged 32 and 34, respectively; they were arrested on Saturday last week outside the hospital, which specializes in oncology treatments for children.

They broke into a Clio and a Mercedes to steal bags and suitcases. The other car belonged to a nurse who worked at the oncology center.

They were arrested shortly after the theft with bags and suitcases still present in their vehicle, according to a report from French newspaper Le Progrès.

Hamza had no criminal record in France up until his arrest, and has already been sentenced to two months in prison for the theft. The second perpetrator, Mohamed, has already been imprisoned twice, once in 2020 and again in 2021. Despite having no official papers or right to asylum, he was not deported. For the latest theft, he was sentenced to six months in prison.

France is facing a tremendous surge in crime due to its rising migrant population. French President Emmanuel Macron admitted last year that half of all crimes in Paris are committed by migrants, but some say that the real figure amounts to two-thirds. Theft also remains a serious problem. Just this month, one migrant was imprisoned for committing over 100 thefts and other burglaries in just three months. In January of this year, an Algerian migrant known as the “most active thief in Paris” was sentenced to three years in prison.

https://rmx.news/crime/france-two-migrants-rob-suitcases-from-young-girl-with-cancer-outside-oncology-ward/

Muslim Professor in Canada Convicted of 1980 Paris Synagogue Bombing – But he has leftist friends in high places

by Robert Spencer

43 years after the bombing of the Rue Copernic synagogue in Paris during Shabbat services on October 3, 1980 that killed four people and injured 46 others, a university lecturer in Canada, Hassan Diab, has been convicted of the crime. Diab didn’t attend the trial and scorned the proceedings, and powerful people in Canada, up to and including Justin Trudeau, have spoken out in his defense. Nonetheless, he has been sentenced in Paris to life in prison, and a warrant has been issued for his arrest. Canada may fight any attempt to extradite him. The case of Hassan Diab is a parable of our times.

Canada’s state-funded CBC reported Friday that after the verdict, Diab “expressed disappointment and called his situation ‘Kafkaesque.’” He added: “We hoped reason would prevail,” and said that it was “still devastating to know they pursued that biased road which led to the unfortunate decision.”

Diab’s lawyer, Donald Bayne, agreed, and decried the unfairness of the proceedings in Paris: “The evidence shows he’s innocent and yet they’ve convicted him. It’s a political result. It’s a wrongful conviction.” Maybe. Or is the rush to defend him what is politically motivated? Randall Garrison, whom CBC identifies as a New Democratic Party “justice critic,” declared: “The horrible conditions Dr. Diab suffered over flimsy and discredited evidence violated his rights and poisoned the process. Given that no justice has been served, New Democrats are demanding the government block any attempts by France to extradite Dr. Diab.” Amnesty International decried the case against Diab as “baseless and flawed.”

However, Yonathan Arfi of the Representative Council of French Jewish Institutions (CRIF) did not think that an injustice had been done. He said: “After 43 years of judicial wandering, justice is finally served for this deadly antisemitic attack. Everything must now be done to enforce the international arrest warrant. CRIF calls on Canada to cooperate with French justice.”

Trudeau, however, reacted cautiously, saying: “We will look carefully at next steps, at what the French government chooses to do, at what French tribunals choose to do. But we will always be there to stand up for Canadians and their rights.”

Well, Justin, that’s debatable. Diab is accused of having carried out the bombing as a member of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, a terror group dedicated to the destruction of Israel. He was arrested In 2008 and extradited to France in 2014, but was released in 2018 after judges stated that there was insufficient evidence to try him. However, many in France clearly believed there was plenty of evidence: CBC notes that “Diab’s release was opposed by more than 20 civil society groups in France — including victims of terrorism groups and pro-Israel organizations.” In 2021, France’s top court ordered a trial and said that if Diab didn’t show up, he would be tried in absentia. And now he has been convicted.

Diab “pointed to remarks Trudeau made in 2018 about his case, when the prime minister said what happened to Diab should not have happened and should never happen again,” and “called on Trudeau to honour those words.” He very well may do so. But the old adage that you can tell a lot about a man by his enemies also works in reverse: you can tell a lot about a man by his friends. Amnesty International has falsely accused Israel of apartheid. Justin Trudeau sendsmillions to the “Palestinians,” which only ends up financing the jihad against Israel. He has also claimed that Islamic law is compatible with democracy. He shares fashionable Leftist views of “Palestinian” victimhood, while ignoring, like other Leftist leaders in the West, the frequent hateful and even genocidal statements from “Palestinian” leaders.

A hypothetical: If Hassan Diab were an Israeli who had been accused of bombing a mosque in France, and had then become a professor in Canada, only to be convicted years later while maintaining his innocence, would Justin Trudeau be fighting for him? Would the government of Canada be hinting that it would fight his extradition to France? It’s virtually inconceivable that Trudeau would have done anything in such a case other than condemn the perpetrator and commend the workings of justice.

Hassan Diab has the advantage of having been part of a movement that is favored on the political Left. That means that even after his conviction, the media accounts are all full of the alleged evidence of his innocence, without any attention paid to the question of why the Paris court was unimpressed by this evidence. If he had, conversely, been a “right-wing extremist” accused of doing an equivalent act, he would be excoriated everywhere and his conviction hailed as a triumph of justice. That’s the state of the “free world,” April 2023.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/muslim-professor-in-canada-convicted-of-1980-paris-synagogue-bombing/

LOL: “WHERE AM I?” – President Trump SLAMS Joe Biden For Constantly Getting Lost and Wandering Around Stages – “He Doesn’t Know What The Hell He’s Talking About… He’s All Ga-Ga” (VIDEO)

UK: The small boat migrant who smuggled himself into Britain and claimed to be 17 – but he was really an ex-Isis fighter aged 42

screen grab youtube

A former Isis fighter smuggled himself into Britain on a small boat across the Channel, posing as a 17-year-old – despite being aged 42, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.

The man is thought to be the oldest person to pretend to be an unaccompanied minor and is understood to have spent up to a week in a local authority residential facility with other under-18s before his lies were exposed.

The Iraqi, named only as ‘AJ’, is a security threat because of his previous active service with the terror group in his own country. 

He is staying in a three-star hotel along with other adult migrants as he appeals a decision – at taxpayers’ expense – to have him deported.

Yesterday, a Home Office spokesman described his case as one of the most ‘egregious examples’ of why this country must stop asylum-seekers crossing from France.

The revelation comes as Rishi Sunak granted a concession to 60 Tory rebel MPs by amending the Illegal Migration Bill – seen as vital to his ‘stop the boats’ pledge – to include compulsory age checks for those claiming they are children.

The MoS can reveal that ‘AJ’ arrived in late 2021, crossing the Channel in a small boat and using fake ID he bought online.

Despite his thick beard, receding hair and ‘numerous’ tattoos on his arms and neck, he applied for asylum as an Unaccompanied Asylum Seeking Child and was put in local authority care in London.

But after suspicious officials checked his fingerprints against a Europe-wide database of asylum-seekers, his true identity was exposed and he was apprehended.

The MoS has learned that he was first encountered by US and UK security forces in Iraq in 2006 and recorded as a terrorist.

He is now on conditional bail and is fighting his deportation in a Legal Aid-funded case, claiming he is suffering from depression which can only be treated by the NHS and that deporting him to Iraq would breach his human rights.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12003117/Migrant-smuggled-Britain-claiming-17-ex-Isis-fighter-aged-42.html

Pro-Pot Kathy Hochul Wants to Ban Tobacco

Democrats are totalitarians. If they decide they don’t like something, demonization and punitive taxation are only the beginning. Sooner or later there will be a total ban — as Governor Kathy Hochul wants to impose on tobacco in New York:

The state Health Department commissioned a new survey aimed at gauging support for an all-out prohibition — despite Gov. Hochul’s failure to secure support from state legislators to include a ban on menthol cigarettes and other flavored tobacco products in the yet-to-be-approved state budget.

The survey isn’t for the little people, but for those whose political support she will need to impose a ban.

The survey, conducted by nonprofit research organization RTI International, was distributed to “community leaders” statewide, including “county legislators and county directors of public health,” according to an April 13 memo to prospective participants from Jennifer Lee, director of the Health Department’s Bureau of Tobacco Control.

Even the proposed level of authoritarianism will not stop people from smoking.

Kent Sopris, president of the New York Association of Convenience Store Owners, predicted a ban would put many stores out of business but wouldn’t stop tobacco use because smokers would just buy cigarettes out of state, online, or illegally on the black market.

“I think it would be bizarre for the state to create another category of illegal product that could lead to more conflict between law enforcement and the community,” he said.

Too bad New York doesn’t enforce laws it already has, rather than succumbing to savagery by letting felons run free.

Meanwhile, Hochul has kicked off a public education campaign encouraging people to buy legalized marijuana products.

“If you are out there advocating for the expanded sale of retail cannabis that sells candied flavored options, how can you tell regulated legal convenience stores they can’t sell menthol cigarettes to adults?” Sopris fumed.

Let alone tell them they can’t sell any cigarettes at all — except marijuana cigarettes.

You can see why Hochul promotes pot while conspiring to make tobacco illegal. Smoking cigarettes is bad for your health, but at least it sharpens the mind, improving concentration, attention, and memory. Marijuana will make you a stupefied zombie — i.e., a fit subject for Democrat rule.

https://moonbattery.com/pro-pot-kathy-hochul-wants-to-ban-tobacco/