Antisemitism, Antizionism, Jihadism and the Reunited Germany. News by Fred Alan Medforth
Officially confirmed: Vaccination is dangerous: Switzerland no longer recommends Covid vaccination. Doctors who continue to vaccinate are now liable.
Another piece of information from the health authorities is also explosive: The manufacturers of the Covid-19 vaccines have exempted themselves from any responsibility in their contracts with the Swiss Confederation, reports “Die Weltwoche”. And further: “The liability lies with the doctors.” The willingness to vaccinate with the Covid vaccine is thus likely to decline further.
Switzerland has withdrawn its recommendation for Covid 19 vaccination with immediate effect. “In principle, the Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH) and the Federal Commission for Immunisation Questions (EKIF) are not formulating a recommendation for vaccination against Covid-19 in spring/summer 2023 due to the expected low virus circulation and high immunity in the population,” it says in a joint release. The FOPH even retracts the recommendation for persons in risk groups.
A report from the canton of St. Gallen has also revealed new information about the costs: 26 million vaccine doses are currently stored in Switzerland. According to the report, the vaccination costs 60 francs (61 euros), and the population has to pay 30 francs (31 euros) for the vaccine alone. So now 780 million francs are in danger of simply ending up in the dustbin.
https://exxpress.at/covid-impfung-nicht-mehr-empfohlen-schweizer-aerzte-haften-fuer-nebenwirkungen/
Britain’s top police force currently employs 161 officers with criminal convictions, some of which pertain to serious sexual offenses.
This is just one revelation unearthed from an update by the Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley to the British government on the action being taken by the force to clean up its image after numerous recent reports concluded it was no longer capable of protecting the public.
The letter by Rowley to Home Secretary Suella Braverman, seen by the British press, highlights the uphill task ahead of those at the helm of Britain’s largest police force to address public concerns over the force’s recruitment and the conduct of its officers.
The force’s leadership commissioned a review into historic allegations and disciplinary hearings for current officers after recent high-profile cases revealed police staff had abused their positions to commit heinous crimes including rape, kidnap, and murder.
Background checks against serving officers have since revealed that 161 police officers have previous criminal convictions, with around half related to traffic offenses including drunk driving, but others pertain to acts of violence, dishonesty, and drug offenses. At least three serving police officers have criminal convictions for sexual offenses.
A review of all 50,000 staff employed by the force also found 55 individuals who may have possible links to criminal networks, and 196 individuals against whom allegations of sexual or domestic abuse were made in the past 10 years, but who were allowed to keep their jobs.
Rowley called for an immediate re-assessment of all officers against whom allegations were made; he also vowed to implement a new re-vetting process for existing staff, a move that is likely to face legal challenges but one he is confident of implementing.
He also revealed that a total of 51 police officers have been sacked since he assumed his role in September last year; he has also overseen a doubling of suspended officers.
“Much of this reinforces the need for a tougher regulatory framework and additional powers to remove officers,” Rowley wrote in his correspondence to the home secretary. “These processes are far more complex, bureaucratic, and slow than normal employment law and that is hampering our efforts.”
Upon receipt of the review’s findings, Home Secretary Suella Braverman said: “I have been clear that a relentless focus on improving standards and common sense policing is required.
“Sir Mark’s update on the work to root out unfit officers demonstrates the scale of this challenge, but I have confidence in his plan to turn around the Met and ensure the force is delivering for the public.
“I am also driving forward work to review the police dismissals process to ensure the system is effective at removing officers who fall below the standards we expect.”
https://rmx.news/crime/britains-top-police-force-has-161-convicted-criminals-on-its-books/
You can have the fundamental human right of free speech, or you can have what liberals call “LGBT rights.” Canada may opt for the latter:
Canadian politician and Member of Parliament Kristyn Wong-Tam recentlyintroduced legislation that would criminalize making “offensive remarks” within 100 meters of Drag Queen Story Hours in the Ontario province of Canada.
Wong-Tam’s bill seeks to establish “2SLGBTQI+ Community Safety Zones” around locations holding Drag Queen Story Hours, where it would be considered a criminal offense to make statements against the events. The safety zone would last for the duration of each event, and anything deemed as “anti-2SLGBTQI+ harassment, intimidation, and hate speech” could incur a penalty of up to $25,000 if prosecuted.
That is to say, it will be illegal to say anything militant perverts regard as resistance to their grooming of children.
As with all things progressive, the zone will expand in terms of time and space, as will the punishment. Soon comes serious jail time for saying anything anywhere in Canada at any time that LGBT activists and child-grooming drag queens don’t like.
Regarding the alphabet soup Canadians are to be force-fed:
According to the Registered Nurses Association of Ontario, “2SLGBTQI” stands for “two-spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, and intersex.” The “+” symbol refers to “other people who identify as a sexual or gender minority.”
At the current rate of decay, people who are not sexually deranged degenerates will soon qualify as “+”.
Like the carbon offsets that call to mind paid indulgences, this is a throwback to Medieval times, but centered on a very different religion. As Chris Gast of Right to Life of Michigan observes,
“It’s the same thing as abortion facility buffer zones. It’s the return of blasphemy laws, centered around their sacraments and where they are practiced.”
Everything profane is sacred to leftists. By the same token, everything sacred is profane. That which they cannot infiltrate, corrupt, and subvert, they will directly abolish.
Wong-Tam has also introduced other pro-transgender legislation, including a 2022 bill to create a provincial “gender-affirming healthcare” advisory committee.
Objecting to being forced to finance grotesque sex-change operations that will inevitably be inflicted on children is an example of hate speech.
https://moonbattery.com/canada-may-criminalize-criticism-of-drag-queen-story-hours/
Hindu organisations on Friday gave a shutdown call in Srirangapatna town in Karnataka’s Mandya district in connection with the alleged police inaction over attack on a Dalit family by a group of Muslim youths.
Bajarang Dal, Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP) and other Hindu activists have given the bandh call and appealed to the shopkeepers to close down all commercial establishments and observe shutdown till evening.
The Hindu organisations will also take out a procession through the main road of Srirangapatna till the police station. They are planning to stage a protest before the police station.
Last week a Dalit family was attacked by a group of Muslim youths over a petty matter in the limits of KRS police station.
Hindu activists are demanding immediate arrest of the accused persons and legal action against them.
The police beefed up the security in the area in view of the shutdown call.
https://hindupost.in/crime/hindu-sc-family-attacked-by-muslim-youth-srirangapatna-karnataka/
Globalist Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte has vowed to “accelerate” his government’s plans to implement its anti-farmer agenda on nitrogen emissions that could see thousands of farms shut down despite the surprise victory of the populist tractor protest party in last month’s provincial elections.
During a parliamentary debate concerning the local and senatorial elections in March in which the upstart Farmer–Citizen Movement (BBB) party became the single largest party in the Dutch Senate — after previously holding zero seats — Prime Minister Rutte doubled down on his government’s EU-driven green agenda that would force farmers to cut their nitrogen emmission by at least 50 per cent by the end of the decade or face the prospect of being shut down.
While Rutte’s four-party coalition fell from 32 to 22 seats in the senate, as the BBB picked up 17 on their own as a result of widespread resentment at the attacks on the nation’s vital farming community, Rutte appears to be intent on pushing forward the policies preferred by Brussels over those favoured by his own citizens.
During the debate, the globalist prime minister said that he intends to “accelerate” the plans to cut nitrogen emissions. However, it is currently unclear if the government will stick to the same exact policy, with the coalition agreeing to negotiate with the agricultural sector and provincial local governments, many of which will now be controlled by the pro-farmer BBB party.
In response, BBB leader Caroline van der Plas said: “This is exactly one of those things that is completely wrong in this cabinet. The lack of empathy, the disdain, the arrogance. And I’m experiencing that again now and I think that’s a great pity.”
Yet, as the governing majority for Rutte’s coalition is so slim, it is currently not in a position to be able to prevent an opposition party from tabling a motion of no confidence, which would collapse the government and force elections. The outspoken leader of the BBB warned last month that she did not believe the coalition is stable and predicted that there would be elections sometime this year, which could see Rutte’s tenure as prime minister, the longest of any democratic leader of the nation, come to an end.
Rutte is in between a rock and hard place though, given that the European Commission has demanded that his government press on with nitrogen curbs. Just last week, a letter from Environment Commissioner Virginijus Sinkevicius in Brussels was sent to the Hague ordering the country to comply with the EU’s Natura 2000 programme designed to protect supposedly environmentally at-risk areas — the vast majority of which happen to be located surrounding farmland.
The EU has previously threatened to impose sanctions on the Netherlands if it fails to cut nitrogen emissions in the regions by 2030, such as introducing restrictions on new construction or roads.
The plans to impose Brussel’s green agenda on the Dutch farming sector sparked widespread tractor protests across the country last year, with thousands of farmers clogging up highways and staging blockades of critical infrastructure. A main point of contention for the farmers was that Rutte’s government admitted that those farms that fail to comply with emissions standards could be forcibly bought out by the government, threatening the future of between two and three thousand farms.
Even those farms that survive such a culling would still face severe hardships given the requirement to cut their emissions of nitrogen, a key fertiliser for many farmers, by between 50 and 95 per cent by the year 2030, with many farmers arguing that the heavy costs of doing so would see their businesses fail, regardless.
Renowned author Juan Manuel de Prada criticized a recently passed Spanish law that allows individuals to legally change their gender based purely on a personal declaration, and called on his compatriots to show the Spanish socialist government just how ridiculous the legislation is by registering en masse as the opposite gender.
In his weekly column for Spain’s ABC newspaper, de Prada said the legislation forced through by Spain’s left-wing administration is “unjust” and claimed the prerequisite for any legislation should be its compliance with the “oldest and first nature of all things.”
He described the law as a poison prescribed by a doctor as a remedy and expressed his concern over the wider implications the legislation could have on Spanish society.
De Prada cited St. Thomas Aquinas, who wrote that it is permissible to rebel against unjust laws, and U.S. philosopher Henry David Thoreau, who warned that compliance with unjust laws inevitably leads to “another kind of slavery” that forces us to “renounce inalienable rights of reason and conscience.”
However, the Spanish writer proposed a different method for his compatriots to deal with the unjust law recently introduced in Spain. He is inspired by Gilbert Keith Chesterton’s remark that where all categories have been completely overturned, only he who breaks them, saves common sense.
He, therefore, said Spaniards should not abolish the law but fulfill it, and thus demonstrate its absurdity.
The Iberian author called on millions of Spanish men to head to the government offices and register as women, and for women to register as men, claiming that under the new law, no one in Spain will be able to refuse their requests, as such an act only requires a declaration by the individual that they “feel” like the opposite gender.
“Only bringing absurdity to a logical conclusion can lead to its complete failure,” he added. “So perhaps it is worth a try?”
