Month: August 2022
The migrant is always the victim: Berlin’s do-gooder police hugged a knife-wielding African after he knifed a German
In Berlin, 41-year-old Moroccan Mounir M. is currently on trial – for a violent offence in a public park, with which he involuntarily helped to emphasise the lesson that a concerned father wanted to teach his daughter: The father had wanted to show the 12-year-old how dangerous it was to be in Berlin’s parks late at night. In the end, Mounir M. made sure in a bloody way that the anticipatory educational measures were fully justified.
What exactly had happened? On August 11 last year, shortly before midnight, 40-year-old Tomas K. and his daughter were arguing loudly in the park in Charlottenburg. The father criticised her for having crossed the de facto no-go areas of a Berlin park at that time of night and wanted to make it clear to her how dangerous it was to be in that area at that time of night (and in view of the conditions in Berlin not only at that time) – due to the migrant troublemakers usually encountered there, including the prevalence of violence and drugs.
“She came much too late from football training,” explained Tomas K. “I got worried, went to meet her. Saw her slowly strolling out of the park – in the middle of the night! She knows not to go that way!” He continued, “I said to her, ‘We’re going back so you understand why you’re not supposed to do that!’ We argued. I lost sight of her in the park.” Shortly afterwards, the father discovered her again – and had to realise that the self-fulfilling prophecy was already the case: “When she came back, a man followed her.”
This man was the accused Moroccan Mounir M.. When the father rushed to help his daughter, he immediately attacked Tomas K aggressively. M. had thrown a full beer bottle, a second bottle had shattered at the father’s feet. “My daughter screamed,” said K.. “The man forced me to my knees and said that this was not my daughter at all. I shouted to her: run away!” Shortly afterwards, the knife showed up in the North African’s hand, with which he stabbed the father several times. He remembers: “I don’t know how I got out of there alive. Two days later I woke up in hospital.”
The consequence of this new “negotiation of daily cultural coexistence” in this case for Thomas K.: severe injuries, several operations, almost total blindness in one eye and severe damage to the others, permanent scars on his face. The Moroccan, however, claims, presumably briefed by default by lawyers of the asylum lobby, that he suffered a “blackout”. “I can’t explain what happened,” he said. From his point of view, what happened, he said, was that “I had lost my job, drank a lot of beer in the park. At night I heard a female voice in the park, there was obviously an argument with a man, I was just trying to help …” He only regained consciousness on a park bench after a policewoman attended to him, he said. “I was covered in blood, but the blood was not mine,” he explained further.
Who hasn’t suffered the same fate – you lose your job, get drunk in the park and carry a knife just in case, so that you are quickly on the spot when you come across another German family man abusing his daughter? Apparently, the Berlin police officer who found the Moroccan in the park after the incident blindly believed in this do-gooder fairy tale, because there is no other way to explain what she did first according to the protocol: she “hugged and comforted” the bloodied perpetrator – assuming that he was the victim, while Tomas K. lay unconscious in the park next to her.
https://journalistenwatch.com/2022/08/02/der-auslaender-opfer/
#WWIII Trends on Twitter as Pelosi Lands in Taiwan
Veteran arrested for ‘causing anxiety’ after retweeting meme: Laurence Fox reacts
Police Commissioner FURIOUS At Woke Officers Arresting Veteran
Do Employees Have To Take Unconscious Bias Training? When Did Companies Become Our Parents?
Record breaking migrant numbers at the Austrian border as officials expect new wave
Authorities in Austria have registered more illegal immigrants at the border with Hungary than ever before after police apprehended 591 individuals in the eastern state of Burgenland in just one day, it has emerged.
The nation’s Operations Center said authorities were expecting a surge in migration and are making the adequate preparations.
“This is a new peak value. We have never had so many arrests in a single day this year and not since 2015, the year of the great wave of refugees,” the Krone newspaper quoted the Operations Center.
“Millions of migrants are waiting”
Illegal immigrants have been pushing their way to Europe via the Balkan route for several weeks now, moving through Serbia into the EU’s borderless Schengen Area before continuing their journey to their European nation of choice.
The primary destination of mass migration is still Germany; however, since Poland expanded its border facilities, Germany’s eastern neighbor has ceased to be a transit country, placing greater pressure on the Austrian border.
“The tense situation will continue to deteriorate,” an investigator told German media. “The previous record for illegal border crossings is likely to be surpassed soon,” they added.
One border guard revealed to the Krone newspaper that officials are expecting a substantial wave in the near future.
“Millions of migrants are waiting hundreds of kilometers to the east in camps and hiding places to flee,” the border guard said. “The preparations for this are in full swing. The rush will come,” they added.
Austria: Deportation escalated – An Afghan and a Somali injure policewoman on the neck
A deportation of two men escalated in Ohlsdorf (district of Gmunden) on Monday: A policewoman was injured in the neck.
At noon, the officers were enforcing a deportation order against a Somali and an Afghan (26). The latter fled, the other resisted arrest and attacked the officer.
The police searched the surrounding fields and forests by helicopter for the escaped man.
He was finally arrested in Gmunden, a few kilometres away, and will now be deported as planned, reported district police commander Gerhard Steiger in an interview with the “BezirksRundschau”.
According to a police statement, a 32-year-old asylum seeker from Somalia was arrested first. He defended himself violently and slightly injured a policewoman. The officers then tried to arrest a second asylum seeker, the 26-year-old, who is believed to have become violent in the course of the police action. However, he managed to flee into a nearby forest.
Since the Afghan was in possession of a Stanley knife, the Cobra task force, SIG forces, the police helicopter, a drone team, a service dog handler and several district patrols were also deployed in the manhunt. Due to a tip-off from the asylum centre, the fugitive was finally arrested shortly before 4 p.m. at the Esplanade in Gmunden and subsequently brought to the police detention centre in Linz.
https://www.heute.at/s/abschiebung-eskalierte-polizistin-am-hals-verletzt-100220565
Pharmaceutical companies behind appeal to Swiss Federal Council for monkeypox vaccines
Because the monkeypox vaccination is not yet available in Switzerland, queer organizations are now collecting signatures to petition the government. Has the Swiss health authority underestimated the situation?
The Swiss queer organization Checkpoint Zurich distributed a picture showing Swiss Health Minister Alain Berset with monkeypox. However, behind the organization are pharmaceutical companies.
That monkeypox particularly affects men who have sex with men, is denied by Checkpoint Zurich. “Mr. Berset, monkeypox can affect anyone.” The health center for queer people is currently demanding that Alain Berset, the Swiss Minister of Health act because according to them, the situation is serious.
The World Health Organization declared an international health emergency over the weekend. In the canton of Zurich, 101 cases have been registered; in Switzerland there are 234 cases.
Checkpoint Zurich has urged the population to send an email to the Swiss Federal Councilor and Health Minister Berset with the following wording:
“I demand that you get the smallpox vaccine (Imvanex) for Switzerland now. Please make it possible for people who want to be vaccinated to have access to the smallpox vaccine as soon as possible.”
The implication is that the Federal Health Authority [Bundesamt für Gesundheit] (BAG) has not done enough to prevent the spread of the disease.
However, the media has not been reporting that Checkpoint Zurich is connected to pharmaceutical companies. The organization is managed in cooperation with the Center for Addiction Medicine ARUD, which in turn has the Swiss Association for the Medical Management in Substance Users (SAMMSU) as a partner. In the years leading up to 2016, SAMMSU was co-funded by pharmaceutical companies Roche, Gilead, and AbbVie, while 2021’s only listed sponsor was ViiV Healthcare.
ViiV Healthcare turns out to be the front organization of various pharmaceutical companies. It emerged from a partnership between GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and Pfizer in 2009. In 2012, the Japanese company Shionogi joined.
Almost all of the organization’s leadership positions are held by current or former GSK executives. For example, Deborah Waterhouse has been CEO of ViiV Healthcare since 2017 and a member of the Executive Committee of GSK since 2020.
The required vaccine Imvanex is currently the only monkeypox vaccine approved in the EU. The vaccine has not yet received approval in Switzerland. It is manufactured by the Danish company Bavarian Nordic, which also has offices in Switzerland, in Zug. And Bavarian Nordic cooperated with GlaxoSmithKline until 2019. However, Henrik Juuel, CFO of Bavarian Nordic, made it known that he would be available for contract production.
There are other connections between the two companies. For example, the CEO of Bavarian Nordic, Gerard van Odijk, was Senior Vice President of GSK Northern Europe until 2005. And the vice president of Bavarian Nordic, Jean-Christophe May was vice president and general manager of GSK Puerto Rico until 2012.
A search on Researchgate also showed that one of the leading co-authors in scientific studies of the Bavarian Nordic CEO Paul Chaplin is Alfred von Krempelhuber from GSK Germany.
Pharmaceutical companies are putting pressure on society and the authorities through front organizations in order to steer them in a certain direction – to the taxpayer’s vault.
The Corruption of the World Health Organization (WHO)
By Eileen F. Toplansky
Abir Ballan, author of the June 2022 piece titled “The WHO Review and Why it Matters to You? has documented the corruption by WHO/global leaders and governments concerning Covid treatment.
In essence, Ballan’s findings are a call to action to “reassess the WHO’s candidacy as an authoritative global public health organization” and the necessary actions needed to “safeguard” people’s “health sovereignty.”
With the unending mismanagement of Covid treatment and the WHO’s influence on so many countries, it is a critical call to action.
Ballan ponders the following:
·Did the World Health Organization follow public health principles when recommending the global Covid-19 response?
- Was the WHO-recommended response to Covid-19 in line with the WHO’s own constitution and its own pandemic preparedness plans?
- Was the WHO guided by science or by private corporate interests?
Ultimately, is the WHO suitable as an agency and global authority when it comes to public health?
The World Health Organization’s own constitution states that “informed opinion and active co-operation on the part of the public are of the utmost importance in the improvement of the health of the people.”
Yet, informed consent, which includes the right to say “no” to the vaccine, was essentially non-existent as companies, schools and governmental institutions coerced people into taking the jab.
Repeatedly, scientists, doctors and other health care workers who attempted to inform the public about alternative treatment options for Covid were censored, punished, and given a pariah status that still exists to this day.
Were non-pharmaceutical interventions [such as masks] deployed during the Covid-19 pandemic in line with the 2019 WHO pandemic management recommendations?
The overwhelming answer is “not even close.”
Here are some excerpts from a 2019 WHO document re: non-pharmaceutical public health measures for mitigating the risk of epidemic and pandemic influenza.
Home quarantine of exposed individuals to reduce transmission is NOT recommended because there is no obvious rationale for this measure [.] (p. 47)
The EFFECT of reactive school closure in reducing influenza transmission varied but was generally limited. ‘In such cases, the adverse effects on the community should be considered (e.g. family burden and economic considerations) and the timing and duration should be limited to a period that is judged to be optimal.’ (p. 52)
The strength of EVIDENCE on workplace closure is very LOW because the identified studies are all simulation studies. (p. 54)
NO scientific EVIDENCE was identified for the effectiveness of travel advice against pandemic influenza; however, providing information to travelers is simple, feasible and acceptable. (p. 61)
Entry and exit screening of travelers [health declarations, visual inspections for symptoms and temperature checks] is ‘NOT recommended due to the overall ineffectiveness in reducing the introduction of infection and delaying local transmission.’ [Moreover] ‘Involuntary screening may have ethical or legal implications. (p. 64)
Nonetheless every one of the above was employed with a vengeance. Schools were closed to the detriment of student achievement. There is now an overwhelming increase in speech delays among students because of two-plus years of social avoidance and lack of face-to-face learning.
To this day, colleges still send already jabbed students home to quarantine. And the fact that already “vaccinated” people become sick is completely glossed over.
In fact, “The WHO played a vital role in influencing the public’s perception of the threat of SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes Covid-19 in some people). Tedros A. Ghebreyesus, the WHO Director General, started his speech (March 3, 2020) by mentioning Ebola, priming the public to make an association between Ebola (a highly deadly disease) and Covid-19. This is a behavioural science technique — techniques used to modify human behaviour subconsciously — that creates an association between two events in order to transfer the characteristics of one event onto the other.”
Is this an accurate way to measure events or rather a means to create behaviors that ultimately are unwarranted and quite detrimental?
After all, despite data showing the low lethality of the virus, the World Health Organization “did not adjust its recommendations to apply the principle of proportionality throughout the pandemic.”
In addition, outright fabrications were disseminated by the WHO. In March 2020, the WHO declared SARS-CoV-2 as an entirely novel virus. In actuality, “SARS-CoV-2 is not entirely novel. It is a new member of the coronavirus family, closely related to the SARS-CoV virus which caused the SARS disease in 2003.”
Yet, WHO’s public messaging was “dominated by scary discussions of not knowing much about this ‘novel’ virus or how to treat it.” Such fear mongering led to isolation, economic ruin and social collapse.
Ballan clearly documents the flip-flopping of the WHO.
The WHO went back and forth on their position on the role of asymptomatic spread in transmission. On the one hand, the WHO claimed that ‘asymptomatic spread of coronavirus is ‘very rare.’ Then they claimed that asymptomatic transmission is ‘a really complex question’ and ‘we don’t actually have that answer yet.’
The WHO continued to push ineffective measures such as masks, social distancing and avoiding touching surfaces throughout the Covid-19 pandemic.
Lockdowns reflect the WHO’s disregard for existing pandemic plans. In truth, “lockdowns is a term that was never used in previous pandemic plans. They do not save lives. They destroy lives and livelihoods.”
Assertions were made by the WHO without actual data to affirm the claims. For example, in March 16, 2020 the WHO stated “this is a serious disease. Although the evidence we have suggests that those over 60 are at highest risk, young children, including children, have died.” But notice the wording.
‘Young people, including children have died.’ Does the WHO specify here the percentage of children and young people who have died as a result of Covid compared to other diseases? The IFR [Infection Fatality Rate] for Covid in children is 0.0013%. More children die from diarrehoea than from Covid.
Yet, children as young as three have died from the jab and their family’s loss is incalculable.
The WHO regularly boasts about the safety of the Covid-19 vaccines while disregarding the daily news about the adverse reactions and the deaths related to the so-called vaccine, i.e., the COVID jabs impact male and female fertility; COVID-19 injections may damage young children’s innate immune systems; personal stories of people injured by the vaccines; COVID vaccines related to cardiac disorders; and permanent disability resulting from the jab.
While the data from the US vaccine adverse events reporting system (VAERS) reflects a clear strong signal to halt the vaccination programs, the programs still continue.
In fact, “as of June 6, 2022, the WHO website shows 3,861,047 reports of side effects following the Covid-19 vaccines since December 2021.”
Disturbingly, “[t]his is not the first time that the WHO has endorsed a vaccine that was known to be harmful. During the H1N1 2009 pandemic, the WHO endorsed the use of the Pandemrix vaccine, despite several studies . . . linking it to a risk of developing narcolepsy as well as other adverse events before it was quickly discontinued.”
Perhaps most damning of all is that the WHO disregarded emerging evidence on potentially effective early treatments for Covid-19 and actively recommended against their use. It “advised against the use of ivermectin to treat patients and limited its use to clinical trials despite promising evidence for its effectiveness and safety in treating Covid-19.”
How many lives would have been saved had the WHO not suppressed the use of life-saving drugs?
Equally alarming is that “[a]t least 20% of contributions come from sources linked to corporate interests and 88% of voluntary contributions are earmarked for specific projects, largely serving those corporate interests. They include donations from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, GAVI – the Vaccine Alliance, UN agencies, the World Bank and Rotary International, among others.”
It should be noted that “Bill Gates is building a GERM – Global Response and Mobilisation Team – which will be managed by the WHO to ensure that the world is ready for future, possibly incorrectly declared ‘pandemics.’ Whose interests will truly be served?
By its actions, the WHO has neutered their qualifications as a global health organization.
Abir Ballan’s study is a true public service enabling people to reflect, assess and act on the value of the WHO and what can be done to return to basic public health core principles.