Month: May 2022

It is shocking that several “young men” with Arabic names allegedly raped a young Tyrolean woman (18) in Innsbruck. One of the alleged perpetrators is on the run, four have been arrested. But no pre-trial detention was imposed – they are at large.

In April, the girl was allegedly lured to a private party, made helpless with drugs and then raped several times. The alleged perpetrators are all said to have Arabic first and last names and to have Austrian citizenship.

According to a report by the newspaper “Krone”, the door buckle was removed from the outside so that no one could enter the room. And then the alleged tormentors attacked her – in the most heinous way and while the other two accused were standing guard at the door, the report says.

All attempts by the young Tyrolean woman to escape were unsuccessful. Only after a few hours was she able to call for help by mobile phone. Six days later, at the request of the Innsbruck public prosecutor’s office, four of the five suspects were arrested by a large squad of police investigators – in four flats at the same time. They were first taken to the police detention centre and then to the Innsbruck prison. The fifth suspect had already fled abroad. Cruel: Investigators even found pictures of the heinous crime on confiscated mobile phones.

As a result, the public prosecutor’s office in Innsbruck filed an application for pre-trial detention. However, this was rejected and the four suspects were set free. The investigation is still in its early stages. Some results, such as those of the victim’s blood test, are still awaited. The evidence could change in the course of the proceedings.

https://exxpress.at/gruppenvergewaltigung-in-tirol-fuenf-arabische-tatverdaechtige-auf-freiem-fuss/

By Raymond Ibrahim

Facebook is at it again — censoring the (Christian) victims of violence and sexual abuse while covering up for their (Muslim) abusers.

A few months ago, I wrote about how Facebook had variously “punished” and censored me for writing about the Muslim persecution of Christians.  The only explanation the “social media giant” gave was that I had offended its “standards.”

If there were still any ambiguity as to Facebook’s true motivation, consider the following story which was reported by ReMix earlier this year:

A UK-based Catholic charity has accused Facebook of censoring its campaign to protect Christian women who have been exposed to violence in predominantly Muslim countries.

Aid to the Church in Need (ACN) had launched a digital campaign in November to raise awareness of the violence often experienced by persecuted Catholic women in Islamic countries, and had chosen to spend money on Facebook to promote its posts.

However, the social media giant opted to severely restrict the organization’s ability to publish adverts online on Facebook, whilst simultaneously banning the charity from its affiliated platforms, Instagram and WhatsApp.

[…]

The campaign had been directed towards United Nations authorities and the UK government, and had included a report titled Hear Her Cries which detailed the acts of sexual violence committed against Christian women in Muslim-dominated countries such as Nigeria, Mozambique, Iraq, Egypt, Pakistan and Syria.

For the record, the plight of Christian women in Muslim nations is, indeed, deplorable.  That is because they suffer from a “double whammy”: they’re both women and infidels.  Thus, in the words of a 2018 report dealing with the Muslim persecution of Christians, “The most significant findings were that Christian women are among the most violated in the world, in maybe a way that we haven’t seen before.”  Six women were raped every day simply for being Christian, the report found.

Another 2016 report states:

Unfortunately, more and more women are the target of [Muslim] terrorist groups. There are numerous international incidents of women being kidnapped, raped, and forced to convert from Christianity to Islam by radical extremist groups… Many are also sold on the open market. This brutality is not only occurring in the Middle East but in Africa and in many other places. In many of these countries, women are subject to persecution because they are considered second-class citizens because of their gender. As minorities in both gender and faith, Christian women face double the persecution. Although we don’t have an exact number, we know that millions of women are being persecuted… In these Muslim-dominated countries, Christian women are systematically deprived of their freedom to live and are denied basic human necessities.

Despite this pandemic that plagues the Islamic world, Facebook has decided that such information must be censored or heavily curtailed.  

As the ReMix report continues:

Facebook restricted the ACN’s [Aid to the Church in Need’s] campaign by 90 percent in November, explaining to the charity that it had taken the measures to limit the charity’s reach due to a number of users reporting the ads as “offensive, misleading, sexually inappropriate” or “violent.”

For the record, openly libeling organizations or websites that specialize in exposing and seeking to redress ongoing atrocities committed against Christian minorities as “pornography” is an old communist tactic. According to Brother Andrew, author of the bestselling God’s Smuggler, that’s exactly what the Soviet Union labeled and confiscated smuggled Bibles as — pornography (p.227).  Indeed, “Big Tech” has used the very same tactic against me — banning my website, which is largely dedicated to exposing the persecution of Christians under Islam, on the claim that it is “pornographic.”

The Remix report concludes:

[T]he tech giant has not yet lifted any of the constraints imposed on the organization [ACN], and has repeatedly refused to explain exactly how the adverts violated its guidelines, despite numerous requests by ACN to do so.

“We are horrified,” said the director of the UK branch of Aid to the Church in Need, Neville Kyrke-Smith, in an official statement, “that our campaign which aims to help suffering women has been censored in such a draconian manner. By claiming to have banned our advert for violating its guidelines, but refusing to say which guidelines or how, Facebook have made themselves judge, jury and executioner.”

Meanwhile, censoring the victims of Islamic violence and abuse is only half of the problem.  The other half, which few know about, is that Facebook and other social media and big tech do not censor Muslim hate speech and calls to violence— even calls to behead Christians — so long as such talk only appears in Arabic or other non-Western languages, thereby largely shielding it from non-Muslim eyes.  

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/05/facebook_censors_persecuted_christians_.html

Despite claims from Germany’s left-wing Interior Minister Nancy Faeser that “right-wing extremism is the country’s biggest threat,” new data from the country’s interior ministry points to the opposite conclusion.

German law enforcement registered an increase of almost 420 percent election-related extremism. There were 10,487 crimes, of which nearly 25 percent of them were committed by left-wing extremists and 8 percent by right-wing extremists. The perpetrators with unknown political motivations committed the remaining crimes.

Politically-motivated crimes rose by around 23 percent across Germany last year, according to data provided by the Federal Ministry of the Interior.

Faeser has pointed to misleading statistics in the past to make the case that right-wing extremisim is the biggest threat in the country. For instance, she pointed to 2021 data that showed “41 percent of all victims of politically-motivated acts of violence were attacked by right-wing extremists in 2021.” However, a closer look at this data shows a heavy reliance on ​​so-called propaganda crimes. Here the statistics show 12,255 registered incidents on the right to 126 on the left, which shows that the left has drastically fewer such offenses.

However, much of what might constitute “left-wing and far left propaganda,” such as totalitarian communist symbols like the hammer and sickle or anarchist symbols, are not illegal in Germany. In fact, such symbols are routinely spray-painted on walls and featured on T-shirts throughout the country. Conversely, far right symbols, such as swastikas, are banned in Germany, meaning any individual who is caught spray-painting or distributing such a symbol will be immediately charged. This imbalance in charging protocols greatly accounts for this imbalance.

Regarding more serious crimes, the left is most often offending. For example, in areas such as property damage, there are 1,176 cases involving the right versus 5,717 such cases from the left.

There was also a sharp increase in politically-motivated crimes due to the 2021 elections. However, there were also stark differences here, with 774 cases involving crimes committed by right-wing perpetrators versus 2,410 such crimes from the left-wing spectrum, representing a rate of approximately three time higher for the left than the right. Regarding violent crimes, the difference is even greater, with 16 such incidents attributed to the right versus 58 for the left.

Overall, the party that suffers from the highest rate of attacks happens to be the conservative Alternative for Germany (AfD). Although the party remains far smaller than other parties, taking in only about 10 to 12 percent of the national vote during most elections, its members have been frequently targeted with physical violence, death threats, and arson attacks.

Overall, interior ministry statistics show that left-wing and right-wing extremist crimes fell by 7 and 8 percent respectively compared to 2020, while politically-motivated violence increased by 15.6 percent to a total of 3,889 crimes. The non-classified violence also increased, growing by 144 percent to 1,444 cases.

According to the interior ministry, a large part of this violence cannot be classified because it is attributable to “crimes in the Covid-19 pandemic context,” which accounts for around a third of all cases in this crime area.

President of the Federal Criminal Police Office Holger Münch highlighted that the “new high and the increase in non-attributable” crimes was due to “increasing social tensions and the resulting polarization and radicalization tendencies in parts of the population.”

https://rmx.news/article/german-left-wing-governments-crusade-against-the-right-complicated-by-data-showing-the-left-is-more-violent/

An uproar at a secondary school in Bavaria: Despite summer temperatures, schoolgirls are forbidden to wear short dresses or shorts. This clothing is not appropriate out of consideration for other cultures and religions. The school management says that the school stands for a “cosmopolitan society”.

At a secondary school in Ebersberg, Bavaria, tight, airy clothing is forbidden for female pupils despite high temperatures. The school headmaster justifies the modest dress code by saying that the school stands for a “cosmopolitan society”. Some fellow pupils with a migration background and foreign teachers would feel disturbed by the short skirts and belly-free tops. One has to be considerate of all cultures, “the right of the individual ends where others feel disturbed,” says the headmaster.

The dress code had been discussed in detail in all classes, there had even been PowerPoint presentations on the subject. The parents of some of the students are outraged: they were not informed. “Otherwise we get a notice for every negligible matter”, says a mother to the daily newspaper “Merkur”. She says it is strange that teachers get “sexually aroused” when girls are dressed belly-less or have a neckline that is too low. “Bans and prohibitions that only affect girls are not up to date,” says another.

The school headmaster cannot understand the fuss about the dress code – it has been in place since 2007. Nor can he understand why some parents are more bothered by the reasoning. “School is not a beach,” he says.

https://exxpress.at/schule-verbietet-maedchen-kurze-kleider-aus-ruecksicht-vor-anderen-kulturen/