Month: March 2022
Leaked Video Reveals Disney Execs Pushing Gay & Gender Agenda. Daily Wire to Fund non-Woke Kids TV
CNN Finally EXPOSE Hunter Biden Scandal
For Ramadan 2022, Auchan is importing KitKat chocolate figures with Islamic imagery for its French shops, designed by Nestlé for the Gulf States
To celebrate Ramadan 2022, Auchan is marketing KitKat Ramadan figures nationally:
The website “Snacking in Saudi”, which specialises in “new food trends in Saudi Arabia in the UAE and more…” informs us that this product is made by Nestlé in Italy exclusively for KitKat Arabia and that “KitKat Ramadan icons can be found in the UAE, Saudi Arabia and other Gulf countries” and adds :
“Aren’t these wrappers so beautiful? 🤩 The bright colours and Islamic geometric patterns are so iconic and stylish.” Snacking in Saudi
Poor Queen: Harry SLAMMED For Shunning Duke’s Memorial
Only Zemmour promises to stop demographic replacement in France
In the forthcoming French presidential election, votes should go to a candidate who will use his power to stem the overwhelming wave of immigration, conservative publicists Pierre Cassin and Jacques Guillemain write in Hungarian daily Magyar Nemzet.
The great demographic change in the West, also known as the Great Replacement, is no longer just a visible reality, because its existence is proven by undeniable data. The Great Replacement should therefore be the main theme of the election campaign, but it does not seem to be, with the exception of a single presidential candidate, Éric Zemmour.
The consequence of the impending demographic transformation is that France, which has long led the world in the scientific and cultural spheres, is gradually giving way to a population from elsewhere that is creating the conditions for us to flee our own homeland.
An apocalyptic future awaits us in the second half of the century. France is in danger of being loss and is already threatened with a terrible degree of economic decay. While one of the three richest countries in the world in the late 1970s, it is now preparing to ruin itself as many cheer the development on. The French elite, however, are performing their victory dances on top of a volcano, in disregard of the imminent danger.
However, after 40 years of talking about the benefits of mass immigration, the more educated, insightful people are finally beginning to realize what a demographic catastrophe is looming on the horizon. It is also evident that the parties and their politicians have lost the ability to take control of the situation.
Without data, it is impossible to understand what a huge demographic transformation is taking place. According to the latest figures from the French statistical office in March 2021, there is an average of 1.84 children per woman, and with this reproduction rate, future generations will not be replaced. However, this is only an average rate of all the peoples in France. Of the 65 million people in the country, along with their descendants, there are about 10 million immigrants from outside Europe, which represents 15 percent of the population.
It is clear that demographic growth is mainly due to immigration, but this fact is treated as an untouchable taboo. The authorities have been hiding the true number of people born to immigrant families for more than 20 years. We do know, however, that the proportion of Muslim first names for newborns is over 25 percent. As the indigenous population shrinks by roughly 20 percent every three generations and the immigrant population grows by 60 percent — and the proportion of the latter is boosted by renewed waves of immigration — a major demographic replacement of ethnic French is expected around 2050. This is exacerbated by another phenomenon: the majority of French university students who head abroad do not return.
In addition, according to the official method used for demographic calculations, third-generation immigrants are already considered deep-rooted French, meaning that only the first and second generations are considered “immigrants.” This is just one method used to disguise the demographic transformation. In 2019, Macron issued 277,000 long-stay visas, 50 percent more than the total since its inception. The current 137,000 asylum seekers are already 61 percent more than those arrived in 2016, complemented by a further 40,000 refugees resettled by neighboring countries under the Dublin Convention and 50,000 “unaccompanied minors,” most of whom are actually adults. They further complicate the situation, as an unaccompanied minor costs €50,000 a year.
Let us not forget that the number of Muslims is close to 8 to 10 million, compared with 500,000 in 1960. The Marrakesh Pact, signed by the French, will further increase the wave of migration. In addition, France naturalizes 120,000 foreigners and 30,000 unauthorized immigrants each year.
Keep in mind that the population in Africa has quadrupled since 1960 and will reach 2.5 billion by 2050. The immigration potential is nearly limitless.
Given that France is not deporting very few and the number of native-born births is falling sharply, it is easy to count on the fact that population change is an existing reality that the authorities are trying in vain to sugar coat by all means. The reality is that Immigration is three to four times the number of net births. Éric Zemmour warns that only 13 percent of immigrants are war refugees and that 70 percent of them are men.
Deniers of demographic replacement are attempting to manipulate reality. Éric Zemmour is the only French presidential candidate to campaign to stop the process. He is the only one who has assured us of his concrete actions and encourages us that not everything is lost yet. The title of his hit book, which was published months ago and has sold 300,00 copies, is “France has not yet said the last word.” As the champion of French identity during his highly successful campaign, Zemmour has voiced that our millennial nation is not yet at its dusk.
What we need to do is clear: we need to close borders, end social benefits for foreigners, abolish citizenship at birth, and encourage childbearing. These measures can put an end to destructive immigration. For Emmanuel Macron, immigration is an inevitable fate that is not worth fighting for. He never intended to defend our country.
https://rmx.news/france/only-zemmour-promises-to-stop-demographic-replacement-in-france/
Macron is ” brutal “: former LREM deputy Frédérique Dumas accuses the French president in a book
She is not prudish in her approach. Frédérique Dumas was one of the first MPs to leave the presidential party in 2018. Four years later, the former MP decided to write about her experiences in the book ‘Ce que l’on ne veut pas que je vous dire. Récit au cœur du pouvoir’ (Narrative at the Heart of Power), published by Massot éditions on Thursday March 31. In her new book, of which Libération has published the first chapters, Frédérique Dumas does not hesitate to criticise members of the government. First and foremost, Emmanuel Macron. She reproaches the President of the Republic for his “brutality” and his “lack of ideas” and even accuses him of “rigorously disempowering all political opponents”.
The former MP for the Hauts-de-Seine département also called Macronism “technocratic progressivism that is driving us against the wall” and that is led by the “commander-in-chief” Alexis Kohler, the secretary-general of the Élysée Palace. Frédérique Dumas also criticised former Prime Minister Édouard Philippe for being “odious, self-assured and dominant to the end”. Not to mention the “psychorigid and paranoid” Education Minister Jean-Michel Blanquer. As for Françoise Nyssen, the former culture minister ” realises not much”, she wrote, who will not run in the parliamentary elections and calls to vote for Yannick Jadot.
Gabriel Attal, the government spokesperson, and Aurore Bergé, the deputy leader of the LREM faction in the National Assembly, are not spared either. As Libération reports, Frédérique Dumas calls them “Underwood junior”, alluding to the US series House of cards, in which a pair of politicians kill a journalist, among others, in order to gain power.
German Development Minister calls for drastically reducing meat consumption
German Development Minister Svenja Schulze (SPD) has called on citizens in Germany to eat less meat. “It would help the grain supply in developing and emerging countries in the medium and long term if we in the rich countries would eat less animal products,” the social democrat explained her initiative.
Schulze told the RedaktionsNetzwerk Deutschland (RND) on Tuesday that agriculture must become more sustainable. She warned. “It’s not a luxury that can be postponed.”
Some 60 percent of the corn produced worldwide alone is used to feed livestock. It is the same thing with wheat in the EU. “If we were to reduce pork production in Germany by 30 percent, one million hectares of arable land would be free – about a tenth of the arable land in Germany,” the minister explained. This could then be used to grow five million tons of grain. In the long term, this could increase food security around the world.
Schulze also referred to Russia’s war in Ukraine. The two Eastern European countries are among the largest grain exporters in the world. As a result of the hostilities, the prices for wheat and other types of grain have recently risen sharply, she said.
SPD politicians have already distinguished themselves in the past with calls for less meat consumption. Last year, SPD party leader Saskia Esken suggested eating less meat. “We have to think about how we can have less of some things without losing quality of life, and sometimes even gaining some. That applies to driving, to flying and also to meat,” said the politician at the time. At the time, the AfD criticized the initiative as the notion of a “supervising party”.
The English Faucis are even worse than the American ones
By Monica Showalter
Most Americans have had a bellyfull of the likes of Dr. Anthony Fauci, the National Institutes for Health bureaucrat who upended society in the name of flawed or absent research in the name of conquering COVID.
It turns out he’s not sui generis, or even a bug in bad system — he’s just a feature.
And now we know where he gets it from.
According to an eye-opening article in National Review by Johns Hopkins professor of applied economics, Steve Hanke, and U.K. University of Durham’s Professor Kevin Dowd, the Imperial College of London is kind of a Fauci cubed, based on its constant fear-mongering and bad research models. The college, unably headed by Dr. Neil Ferguson, wields power in inverse proportion to its compentencies. And that power includes even the U.S. They begin:
The defining event in the history of Western Covid lockdowns occurred on March 16, 2020, with the publication of the now infamous Imperial College London Covid report, which predicted that in the “absence of any control measures or spontaneous changes in individual behaviour,” there would be 510,000 Covid deaths in Great Britain and 2.2 million in the United States. This prediction sent shock waves around the world. The next day, the U.K. media announced that the country was going into lockdown.
The impact of the report was amplified by the U.K’s soft-power machine, the BBC. Its reach has no equal: broadcasting in 42 languages, reaching 468 million people worldwide each week, and efficiently disseminating its message. With the BBC in full cry and the public genuinely alarmed, there was no room for dissent.
A copycat cascade then took hold, with the U.S. and other countries embracing London’s message and policies. The result was a policy based on a defective model that originated at Imperial College under the leadership of Neil Ferguson.
The model’s major flaw is its assumption that people would be unresponsive to the dangers that accompany a pandemic. That behavioral assumption is unrealistic. If people are told they are in danger of catching a potentially lethal disease, most will take action to reduce their exposure. The Imperial team turned the world on its head with fantasy numbers about a scenario that could never materialize.
It turns out that this group has been wrong on pretty much every infectious disease it’s ever made pronunciamentos about, at least over the past 20 years. Their formula has been to declare a public health emergency every time a new illness strikes, forecast monster death numbers, and demand huge disruptions from lockdowns and other measures until they get what they want. Hanke and Dodd write:
Before hurrying into panicked policy decisions, U.K. policy-makers should have been aware that Neil Ferguson’s Imperial College team had a history of defective modeling. With minimal effort, policy-makers would have quickly discovered that that team had a track record that makes astrology look respectable.
Incredibly, they have been wrong on everything. In 2001, they dropped the ball on U.K. foot and mouth disease where they demanded every animal be slaughtered to prevent the spread of the disease — millions and millions of livestock animals. Most of us remember how traumatic that was to farmers and animal lovers. Turns out their forecasted death count wasn’t anything near what they claimed it would be, and most of the animals could have been safely vaccinated. They weren’t. But the Imperial College got a taste of power from this and went on to create other problems.
After that, they got busy with “mad cow” disease, something that cropped up in the early 1980s in the U.K. (when I lived there, which is why to this day I can’t donate blood), and they felt a need to redux. Bad forecasts, lousy modeling, and 178 people died, not their forecasted 150,000.
They made similar mistakes of overblown forecasts and underwhelming death counts on bird flu and swine flu.
And nobody punished them when it became obvious they were wrong. Hanke and Dowd call for an “audit” of this group to find out why their models were so off base and that makes sense.
What it shows is that power is an aphrodisiac among the medical elites, and they rely on a fear-mongering formula to wield power. Oncea pandemic burns itself out, they will get started on another one because the name of their game is power..
It’s embarrassing stuff but sunlight — and an audit — is can be the best disinfectant.
Many Ukrainian refugees aren’t really Ukrainian, says insider police source in Germany
Since the beginning of the wave of refugees as a result of the war in Eastern Europe, critical voices have been warning that non-Ukrainians could take the opportunity to come to Germany. After riots took place in a Munich refugee accommodation, this suspicion was confirmed. More than 50 people clashed there on Saturday, and attacked one another with chairs and paving stones, triggering a large-scale police operation.
According to the Bild newspaper, a police source said about the conditions on site: “Only a fraction are really Ukrainian refugees.” Among other things, large families that are assigned to the Sinti and Roma ethnic groups are conspicuous, according to the police officer.
“They have brand-new Ukrainian passports, which are also real. Someone in Ukraine is making a fortune right now,” the newspaper quoted the police officer as saying.
As Remix News previously reported, an investigation from French newspaper Figaro, one of the top-selling newspapers in the country, found that approximately one in three people claiming they were Ukrainian refugees were not actually Ukrainians.
Over 270,000 Ukrainian refugees have entered Germany since the crisis began, but the country’s foreign minister, Annalena Baerbock, said that Europe should take in 10 million. It is unclear how many she wants Germany to specifically take in.
Chaos at asylum center
The incident began after arguments broke out between different groups at the accommodations. The situation escalated after authorities attempted to separate some of the individuals who have scabies. A security guard used pepper spray, after which 20 people had to be treated for eye irritation. Rioting then broke out, with different groups fighting one another along with security guards. After the riot, 30 adults and 70 children were moved to another accommodation.
As early as mid-March, a group of refugees who are also said to have been Sinti and Roma caused unrest in Miesbach, Bavaria. The 57 people protested against being housed in a sports hall. They were demanding a 3-star hotel instead.
