German doctor confirms that excess mortality is directly linked to Covid 19 vaccination

For Dr Reitz there is no doubt: The excess mortality that has been observed since 2021 is largely due to the vaccination against Covid-19. According to their analyses, particular importance is attached to the booster vaccinations. She cannot understand the silence of leading institutions despite the clear data, nor the uncritical behavior of her colleagues. There is also no correct information about the risks of vaccination.

Reitz is a specialist in general medicine and psychotherapeutic medicine with her own practice in Hamburg. In a speech at the Monday demonstration in Offenbach on January 31, 2022, she presented the results of her research to the audience.

Since the spring of 2021, since the start of the nationwide Covid vaccinations, people have been dying, according to Reitz literally, like flies, so that millions of deaths have now been recorded worldwide. The doctor differentiates between rapid death within the first fourteen days after the vaccination and a permanently increased chance of early death. In the latter case, the booster vaccinations play an important role.

Millions of deaths worldwide are attributable to the Covid vaccination

“In Germany we have such an obvious excess mortality rate of 22 percent in December and 20 percent in November. That hasn’t happened since the war. That’s what a big newspaper wrote. She expressed astonishment that politicians have never shown any interest in the effects of the shots and instead tried to find ways to make them compulsory.

“You die in Germany. You die in England. They die in Europe. They die all over the world. The fact that no one puts their finger on the wound here, from the press, from the government, is the part that actually makes your blood boil. We’ve all seen it before, that a million deaths don’t interest us. There are millions dead, there are millions dead. Worldwide.”

Reitz pointed out that “very hard data from young people in England” showed that people under 60 have an excess mortality rate of 100 percent. “Hundred percent more chance of dying if you get shots than if you don’t get shots and then get some virus or whatever.”

In Germany there have been around 12 000 to 13 000 deaths per month from vaccinations with numbers rising from booster shots.

“We had ten percent in October. That was way, way, way too much. And we have institutes that are incredibly well paid, such as the Paul Ehrlich Institute and the RKI, which are supposed to be the guardians of our health and should also be able to recognize epidemiological emergencies. All these institutions have this data. Since June, they have seen that we have an inexplicable excess mortality rate that can only be explained by the vaccinations. And what are they all not doing? They’re certainly not sounding the alarm.”

She accused Karl Lauterbach, the German Minister of Health of being “absolutely irresponsible”. Reitz added that three-quarters of excess mortality was due to vaccination.

“It’s not just an allergic shock that can occur. Instead, it has been proven – these were American cardiologists, cardiac doctors – that the vessels and organs are inflamed and therefore the probability of developing a serious heart disease increases by 120 percent. Not by 20 percent, but by 120 percent.”

Cancers are rife after Covid vaccination

“It has been proven by a study from Sweden, by Bansal and others, who examined people who had died after vaccination and found up to four months later that the spike proteins, which should actually have been excreted by now, still sit in the cells in the body, in the organs and cause inflammation there. The pathologists in Reutlingen have confirmed the same thing. They also said we see white blood cells everywhere in the organs that don’t belong there. That’s inflammation. That’s why these people died and they could only associate it with the vaccinations,” Reitz explained.

Further studies from Sweden revealed that the human repair mechanisms in the cells become permanently damaged by the vaccinations. “That explains why so many cancers explode when people have been vaccinated. This explains why many illnesses that seemed to have been alleviated reappear,” said Reitz.

“We’ve had a 50 percent increase in probability, an increased number of heart attacks and strokes in emergency hospital admissions since April. That’s what the figures from the RKI say. These are all official data that I bring, these are all studies that exist. They explain why so many people are dying and have died.”

Booster vaccination increases risk of death

“Well, it’s been proven that vaccines are to blame for at least 12 000 deaths a month since November and December. And each booster increases the risk of dying.”

Those who took the jab have fifteen years less to live on average. “So if I were to enlighten someone about vaccination, I would have to say, listen, your risk of dying early from the vaccination, of dying fifteen years earlier, is statistically proven. And the risks of dying from the Corona disease are significantly lower. Would you like to be vaccinated? This information is not communicated anywhere at all. And certainly not for children.”

https://freewestmedia.com/2022/02/06/german-doctor-confirms-that-excess-mortality-is-directly-linked-to-covid-19-vaccination/

“It took more than 300 dead victims of terrorism” for the French elites to open their eyes: A former intelligence chief warns against Salafism

He denounces the political strategy of “calming the waters” in the face of Islamism. In the newspaper Le Figaro of Friday February 4, the former head of the secret service DGSE, Alain Chouet, author of the book “Sept pas vers l’enfer” (Seven steps towards hell), writes that Salafism plays a decisive role in Islamist terrorism. He judges that the followers of this movement have managed to “present themselves as victims” by benefiting from the “Islamo-beatnik” lines of the left in the 1980s and later of the Republicans, who feared accusations of Islamophobia.

“They all exhaust themselves in being of service to the agitators, whose replacements are infinitely renewable,” notes Alain Chouet. In his opinion, the real danger is not Islam but Salafism. “You have to point the finger at the enemy, especially at the money that allows them to spread their separatist message,” he explains. He points to the problem of support for Salafism from the rich petromonarchies, Arabia being the first. “There is much to be done, in the media and politically, to denounce the Salafism of the Wahhabis, the Muslim Brotherhood and all those who in any way promote an Islam that is incompatible with modernity and democracy,” the author told Le Figaro newspaper.

He regrets, however, that it took “more than 300 dead terror victims for the entire French political and intellectual elite to finally admit – sometimes with great reluctance – that there is a problem”.

https://www.valeursactuelles.com/societe/il-a-fallu-plus-de-300-morts-du-terrorisme-pour-que-les-elites-ouvrent-les-yeux-un-ancien-de-la-dgse-se-lache-sur-le-salafisme/

Sudanese Migrant Convicted of Murdering Open Borders Activist French Girlfriend

Photo:  Audrey Coignard, https://www.fdesouche.com/2022/02/05/saint-ouen-93-une-jeune-femme-retrouvee-morte-avec-plusieurs-plaies-par-arme-blanche/

A Sudanese illegal migrant has been sentenced to twenty years in prison after being found guilty of murdering his former girlfriend, a pro-migrant activist, in 2019.

Rifat Abbas, a 34-year old Sudanese illegal migrant was found guilty in a court in the Parisian suburb of Seine-Saint-Denis on Friday, receiving a prison sentence of twenty years. The migrant was accused of stabbing his former girlfriend, 27-year-old Audrey Coignard, to death in her apartment on September 16th of 2019.

The lawyer for Abbas told the court that her client should receive a merciful sentence in light of his tough migratory journey through Libya where he was allegedly tortured, Le Figaro reported.

On Thursday, the Sudanese national admitted that he had “stabbed” his former victim in order to “silence her”.

“I was afraid that the neighbours would hear and the police would come,” he said.

Friends of the victim spoke out about Coignard, saying she was “an activist and passionate medical student, Audrey was always ready to support her family, friends and the people she met on her way,” French newspaper L’Orne Combattante reports.

Coignard was found dead in September of 2019 and her then-32-year-old former Sudanese illegal migrant boyfriend was arrested and indicted for her murder by the prosecutor’s office of Bobigny in October of that year.

Investigators say that the body of the 27-year-old was found in her apartment at around 4 pm on September 16th and that her body showed wounds consistent with those inflicted by a knife. According to a report from the newspaper Le Parisien, Coignard had been stabbed at least fourteen times.

Coignard had worked as a medical intern at a local hospital and had also volunteered with a local pro-migrant group that fought against the expulsions of illegals from France.

The murder was just one of several involving migrants accused of murdering French women in 2019.

Earlier that year in June, a Pakistani migrant was accused of murdering a 23-year-old woman who was found suffocated to death in the trunk of her own car after being missing for several days. The young woman had been employed as an intern for a company supplying ice cream to a supermarket chain and her last known location had been a supermarket where the Pakistani had been employed.

A month later in July, a Syrian migrant was arrested in southwest France on suspicion of raping and murdering a 24-year-old mother who is said to have suffered from a slight mental disability.

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2022/02/05/sudanese-migrant-convicted-of-murdering-open-borders-activist-french-girlfriend/

Worldwide Movement: Massive Freedom Convoy Formed in Helsinki, Finland Against COVID-19 Mandates and High Fuel Taxes – Cops Detain 55 Protesters

Red Cross withdraws from ‘Austria vaccinates’ campaign

The Austrian government fanatics will soon be alone because the vaccination front is crumbling quite spectacularly. Even the Red Cross is now abandoning the sinking vaccination ship and withdrawing from the “Austria vaccinates” campaign.

The Red Cross rescue commander Gerry Foitik made this clear in an internal letter that is available to the daily Wochenblick. Like Caritas and Diakonie, the Red Cross also reported concerns about mandatory vaccination. There is an increasingly great legal uncertainty and the risk of years of legal disputes in the health, social and care sectors for those actors who insist on the jab.

Red Cross withdraws from vaccination campaign

The law on prescribed bodily harm with experimental genetic engineering injections was passed yesterday in the Bundesrat, but the Corona regime is losing its support. More and more are turning away, including the Red Cross. According to the rescue organization, the Federal Chancellery had already taken over the “communication measures” of the vaccination campaign since July.

The question now arises: Why now when this withdrawal was “transparently and publicly communicated” in the summer already? The reason may be that Foitik, previously a measure extremist and known for his bizarre mask interviews, is concerned about the legal implications of forced vaccination.

Red Cross boss sees jab as ‘state-imposed individual responsibility’

Foitik announced on Wednesday via a letter that the Red Cross would withdraw from the “Austria vaccinates” campaign. After being responsible for the “Austria vaccinates” campaign in summer 2021, the homepage and all social media channels will now also be returned to the Ministry of Health’s area of ​​responsibility. In his letter, Foitik himself described the obligation to vaccinate as “state-imposed individual responsibility”.

The FPÖ General Secretary Michael Schnedlitz asked whether Foitik’s letter could not also be seen as a withdrawal from the obligation to vaccinate: “Mr. Foitik, who was royally rewarded by the government for his comments at the beginning of the Corona pandemic, is now distancing himself from the vaccination campaign – and thus also from the obligation to vaccinate?”

More and more arguments against compulsory jabs

Even more interesting are Foitik’s statements against the background that before the adoption of the compulsory vaccination law in the Bundesrat on Thursday, social organizations such as Caritas and Diakonie expressed their concerns about the compulsory vaccination law in addition to the Red Cross.

As a result, they all see great legal uncertainty and the danger of years of legal disputes for the health, care and social sectors throughout Austria. “The closer the compulsory vaccination law comes, the greater the concerns from all sides that this measure has no justification. Apparently the Red Cross has now pulled the rip cord and decided to withdraw from the vaccination campaign,” Schnedlitz said.

Billions spent on jabs

The pharmaceutical industry has been closing deals worth billions with Austria. This was revealed by the FPÖ’s parliamentary question to Health Minister Wolfgang Mückstein (Greens).

FPÖ leader Herbert Kickl noted with great surprise that more and more genetic engineering injections are being ordered, although less and less of them are being consumed.

“This exposes the crude and expensive dealings of the Austrian government with the vaccination industry, which not only confirm the worst expectations, but exceed them,” Kickl said.

Austria has so far been billed 246 million euros by the pharmaceutical giants until the end of October. So far, 23,9 of the ordered 57 million vaccine doses have been delivered. More than 300 million euros will have to be paid for the 33,1 million vaccine doses still to be delivered. The government still wants to buy another 33,5 million.

At least 283 140 vaccine doses have gone where they actually belong: on the rubbish heap.

Over half a billion euros for vaccine manufacturers

“In total, the Austrian Federal Government has done business with the vaccination industry to the tune of over half a billion euros so far. And with the purchase of another 33 million vaccine doses planned for this year, another 300 million euros will be added. So the Corona vaccinations of Austrians are a billion euro deal of the federal government with the vaccination industry,” Kickl added.

Less than half of the vaccine doses consumed

Huge quantities of “vaccines” were ordered, which they can only get rid of “by forcing the population to have the vaccine administered”. Vaccination lotteries and raffles are used to lure people, Kickl explained. Less than half of the quantities ordered have actually been delivered and consumed so far. “The legally imposed and unconstitutional compulsory vaccination is due to nothing more than a pathological compulsion to buy on the part of the federal government.”

All corruption indices show that the pharmaceutical industry is among the most corrupt business sectors in the world. “Who benefits from Austria ordering more and more vaccine, although less and less vaccine is needed and the Corona pandemic continues to decline?”

https://freewestmedia.com/2022/02/05/red-cross-withdraws-from-austria-vaccinates-campaign/

Why Ivermectin was Disappeared

By Henry F. Smith Jr., MD

It’s a common occurrence in winter. A patient calls a primary physician to report a nonproductive cough, slight hoarseness, muscle aches, and a low-grade fever. The physician, and likely the patient, realize that this is almost certainly a viral upper respiratory infection. If the patient were in the office, the physician may test for a streptococcal bacterial infection, but it will likely be negative.

This is probably an infection with a rhinovirus, adenovirus, or endemic coronavirus. Despite this, the afflicted patient will happily proceed to the pharmacy to pick up their prescription for an antibiotic. The patient will feel as though the physician was proactive, something the doctor certainly understands.

This prescription, however, will be of no value to the patient and may actually cause issues. Yet pharmacies in the U.S. see this type of prescription thousands of times a day.

It occurs despite the fact that physicians are constantly reminded that gratuitous antibiotic prescriptions come with side effects and can lead to antibiotic resistance. Beyond that, there is no tangible resistance to this practice from the medical establishment or healthcare authorities.

Now let’s imagine another patient calls in. This patient also has a dry cough scratchy throat, muscle aches, and a low-grade fever. Only this patient had a COVID test kit at home and tested positive. The physician wants to prescribe a medication with no risk of bacterial resistance and a very benign side-effect profile. He’s read lots of literature to suggest it will be helpful. There are a significant number of double-blind studies showing it to be effective in the treatment of SARS Co-V2.  It has been used in multiple countries with excellent results. Except, in this case, the physician will find it impossible to prescribe that medication. It will be impossible because that medication is Ivermectin. And somehow it has been removed from the market.

Not only has this FDA-approved, Nobel prize-winning drug been made unavailable, but if a physician were to prescribe it, or advocate it as therapy, they are threatened with the potential loss of their medical license, their hospital affiliations, and their board certification.

It gets even more ironic. I’ve noticed that some physicians are prescribing a very common antibiotic called azithromycin for their COVID patients. It is well understood that for COVID-19 when taken alone, it is of no value. There is absolutely no data to show efficacy in COVID-19. It has the same potential problems, as when it is prescribed for other viral infections. Yet the practice goes on, again unimpeded.

Let’s go one step further.  Levofloxacin is another antibiotic, introduced in 1996. It was unusual in that it can treat a broad variety of infections, even those that are severe, but can be given orally. Because of this, it was overutilized, threatening to create drug resistance.

In 2016, the FDA issued a black box warning because of several severe side effects including tendon rupture, peripheral nerve damage, for them and psychosis. Since then its usage has waned.

The drug was proposed as a treatment for COVID early in the pandemic but proved to have limited antiviral activity

So I posed this hypothetical to several pharmacist friends: If a physician called in a prescription for azithromycin, or even levofloxacin, and gave the diagnosis of COVID-19, would they fill the prescription?  The answer was yes, as there would be nothing to prevent it.

So, in other words, a physician is permitted to prescribe useless antibiotics, even those with serious adverse reactions according to the FDA for COVID-19 infection.  If, as apparently, the FDA believes, ivermectin is similarly useless but benign, why is it alone being blocked?

Let’s do some mathematics.  As of this writing, there are roughly 890,000 deaths recorded in the United States related to COVID-19.  I think most people understand that a lot of these deaths are not due to the virus but from other comorbid conditions.  The CDC has long stated that the number of deaths from COVID where there was no comorbid condition (In other words, healthy people who died from COVID) is roughly 7% of the total (65,000).  In several meta-analyses, Ivermectin was shown to be roughly 65% effective at preventing serious disease and/or death.  So, in the best-case scenario for them, our public health organizations, by suppressing Ivermectin, may be responsible for roughly 40,000 deaths.  In fact, the vast majority of people who actually died from COVID had multiple comorbid conditions, so that number could be much higher.

I need to acknowledge that prescribing antibiotics for viral infections is something that the primary caregivers struggle with. Patients expect them to do something when they’re sick. They don’t appreciate being told to go home and take acetaminophen. Some may never come back and seek care elsewhere.

Yet patients have accepted that exact recipe for dealing with COVID-19, a disease they perceive may actually kill them.

So what’s the difference between prescriptions written for an anti-bacterial, versus Ivermectin, which is an anti-parasitic agent, for a viral infection? Both primarily target infectious agents other than viruses. If anything, even it was futile therapy, Ivermectin is safer than the antibiotics discussed.  Yet it is the only medication that has been effectively banned

Given all this, I think it’s easy to suspect that the FDA, the NIH, and the CDC actually understand the potential benefits of Ivermectin and other repurposed drugs. But they also realize that these medications threaten the profits of the pharmaceutical industry with which they are financially entwined.

What makes this even more infuriating is the government’s warm embrace of two new antiviral medications, Pfizer’s Paxlovid, and Merck’s Molnupivinir. These drugs have exactly one company-sponsored study each to vouch for their efficacy. Merck’s drug, by its own testing, is only 39% effective in reducing severe disease and/or death. There is no long-term safety data for either medication. Yet both have received emergency use authorization, and have suddenly popped up on government-approved treatment protocols.

As I look towards the end of my career, I’ve seen a lot of profit-oriented behavior by pharmaceutical companies. I think of the me-too drugs, molecules that are only slightly different than their now off-patent predecessors aggressively marketed to physicians. I’ve seen pharmaceutical reps actually reimburse physicians for a certain number of prescriptions written for their medications. I’ve seen manipulation of the rules regarding inhaled medications to maintain their patents long after they would have expired.

But if they actively suppressed the adoption of useful medications during a pandemic, then this is beyond the pale. It would suggest a total collapse of any morality or sense of responsibility within the pharmaceutical industry, and their partners in the regulatory agencies.

I hope that someday, our investigatory agencies can push past the vast political power these companies have acquired through their burgeoning profits, and find out the truth.

I’m not optimistic.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/02/why_ivermectin_was_disappeared.html