Month: January 2022

In February and March, respectively, both Germany and Austria would have introduced compulsory vaccination against Covid-19, something that has met with massive protests. In step with the growing resistance among the populations in both countries, signals from leading politicians are now coming that what is called the “vaccination obligation” will not be introduced in February and March. Technical problems and unsustainable time planning are said to be reasons for the coercive measures being postponed.

In mid-November, the Austrian government, made up of the conservative ÖVP party and the Greens, announced the introduction of a so-called “vaccination obligation” for all residents of the country to reduce, according to the government, the spread of Covid-19. This sent minor shock waves through Europe.

Most then understood that the introduction of compulsory vaccination and repressive measures against those who did not obey would be the definitive evidence that the Corona pandemic was being used as a pretext to establish a dystopian control and a police state.

Fines and imprisonment

The Compulsory Vaccination Act was intended to be introduced from February 1 and had been provided with highly repressive tools to make citizens obedient to the Austrian state. The measures that the government intended to take concerned both fines and imprisonment. Those who refused to be vaccinated would have faced stiff fines, while non-payers faced prison.

Around January 8, however, Austrian media reported that the oppressive compulsory vaccination law would be postponed. The company ELGA GMBH, which develops the technology to be used to monitor citizens’ willingness to adapt, now claims that it needs more time to fully develop the monitoring technology. It is expected that the technology would be implemented at the earliest from April this year.

Popular protests are growing in strength

While the surveillance company ELGA GMBH claims to have suffered from “technical problems”, a number of companies and organizations have also sent responses to the government in which they strongly criticize the proposed compulsory vaccination law for violating Austria’s legislation on civil liberties and rights.

At the same time, hundreds of thousands of protesters have taken to the streets at the risk of their own safety to show their opposition to the increasingly totalitarian state which is Austria.

Germany is also postponing compulsory vaccination

In November 2021, around the same time as Austria announced its intention to introduce compulsory vaccination of the entire population from February, the new Social Democratic Chancellor of Germany, Olaf Scholz, announced similar measures. He said that in the so-called traffic light coalition, consisting of Social Democrats, Greens and Liberals (red, green and yellow), it was agreed that a “vaccination obligation” would be introduced in early March 2022.

But even from Germany, there are now signals that the compulsory vaccination will be postponed indefinitely, at least until May. On the same weekend as the Austrian media reported that their compulsory vaccination was being postponed, German media announced the same thing, including the Tagesspiegel newspaper and the German public-service TV channel ARD’s news program Tagesschau.

Perfidious liberals

According to both Tagesspiegel and Tagesschau, authorities need to better investigate the legal consequences of a compulsory vaccination law, according to German mainstream media. Somewhat unexpectedly, however, these media outlets state that it is the smallest governing party in the traffic light coalition, the liberal FDP, which raises more and more questions about whether a compulsory vaccination law rhymes with the German legislation. This has not only irritated the Social Democrats and the Greens, but also the largest opposition party the CDU.

The postponement may be a ruse by these parties to placate opponents before they issue fresh totalitarian decrees. Last month, the European Medicines Agency authorized boosters every three months. The WHO however released a statement on Wednesday pointing out that “a vaccination strategy based on repeated booster doses of the original vaccine composition is unlikely to be appropriate or sustainable”.

Nationalist parties are fighting for freedom

It should be said that in Germany, the popular libertarian protests against the already existing restrictions and the intended compulsory vaccination law have increased. In both countries these are national-minded opposition parties. In Austria it is the FPÖ and in Germany it the AFD.

The resistance to Covid-19 vaccines in German-speaking has been notable, especially in Switzerland. Despite being one of the wealthiest countries in the world, Switzerland has the lowest Covid-19 vaccination rate in western Europe. More than one-third of the Swiss population have not even had a first dose of the jab.

In neighbouring Austria, over 33 percent have yet to take a single shot of the vaccine, and in Germany it is also more than 30 percent. In Germany, resistance to the vaccine is marked in the affluent southern states of Bavaria and Baden-Württemberg as well as in regions which were part of the GDR, such as Saxony.

Bavarian President Markus Söder told a German talk-show: “We have two viruses in the country. We have Coronavirus and we have this poison [of vaccine skepticism], which is being spread on a massive scale by the Querdenker and by parties like the [far-right] Alternative for Germany [AfD].”

In Switzerland, vaccine uptake in German cantons has been far lower than in French and Italian ones. In Appenzell Innerrhoden, 45 percent of the population was still completely unvaccinated in November 2021, at the height of the vaccine drive and even before the reports of adverse events following the jab started surfacing.

In a survey Erfurt University asked Germans why they did not want these jabs. Some 80 percent of the unvaccinated said they needed to weigh up the risks and benefits first, while 41 percent simply considered vaccination “unnecessary”.

In Austria’s regional elections in September, MFG, a newly established vaccine-sceptic party, made its entry into politics. Some 30 percent of its voters were previous supporters of the far-right, 30 percent were former moderate conservatives and 16 percent were former Socialists and 12 percent were ex-Greens.

Corona app already used by police

It recently became known that the German police in Mainz accessed data from the contact tracing app LUCA after a death. The authorities have thus been issuing penalties within the framework of mandatory vaccination on ELGA, the electronic vaccination database.

A fall resulting in death in front of a restaurant is likely to have prompted the Mainz police and public prosecutor’s office in their investigation to find witnesses by accessing the LUCA app. However, there is no legal basis for doing so. The fall occurred at the end of November.

According to media reports, the questionable investigative steps even led to 21 witnesses being summoned. And that although the data recorded in the app is allegedly used to track contacts in the context of the Corona pandemic, according to the German Infection Protection Act and data protection, this has not been the case.

Users actually have to be informed in advance about the possible use and disclosure of their personal data. This contact tracking app is used by over 40 million Germans and is only intended to notify registered people in the event of a Corona outbreak. The trust of citizens in such apps is certainly not strengthened by the Mainz case.

The fact that a declaration of consent for the processing of personal data has to be signed when visiting the dentist, for example, borders on mockery.

https://freewestmedia.com/2022/01/13/compulsory-vaccination-postponed-in-austria-and-germany-due-to-technical-problems/

The Islam researcher Susanne Schröter criticises the announced integration policy of the “traffic light” coalition in unequivocal terms. Instead of the principle of ” support and demand”, the new government is declaring a renunciation of demanding integrative efforts from migrants.

Schröter writes this in an article for the newspaper Neue Zürcher Zeitung. “The success of integration is now understood exclusively as the task of the majority society.”

The sharpest instrument of this “plan for an imposed social transformation” are anti-discrimination guidelines against “group-related misanthropy”, which are aligned with demands of lobby organisations. “Numerous Muslim NGOs and their supporters have understood how to make the most of the self-accusation of bourgeois circles who consider themselves racist simply because they are white and non-Muslim,” says the head of the Research Centre Global Islam at Frankfurt’s Goethe University.

Schröter sees the spread of an aggressive, intolerant Islam among Muslim pupils as a particularly damaging development for integration, which is, however, tabooed by the leftist zeitgeist. “This is not about religious rights or even the constitutionally guaranteed freedom of religious confession, but solely about Islamist supremacy,” Schröter writes. The ones who suffer are religious minorities, especially Jewish pupils, “but also liberal Muslims who are subjected to constant religious bullying”.

For children and young people from precarious backgrounds in particular, school can be a space where they can transcend the rigid conditions of their family of origin and acquire knowledge “that is ostracised as heretical knowledge in their milieus, but is the key to successful careers in our society”. Only then would they have real opportunities to participate.

But all this only works if they can develop freely at school without having to fear the influence of mosques and parental homes in the form of Islamist guardians of public moral values.

https://rp-online.de/politik/deutschland/integrationspolitk-susanne-schroeter-wirft-ampel-einknicken-vor-islamischen-lobbygruppen-vor_aid-65275197

by Giulio Meotti

When Konstantin Eggert, former deputy editor of the Russian newspaper Izvestia and radio Kommersant, correspondent of the BBC from Moscow and columnist of the Financial Times, resigned from the famous think tank Chatham House in London for its having awarded an award to Melina Abdullah, founder of Black Lives Matter, he did it with a spectacular letter-testimony. “There is no need for a Gulag today to enforce conformity,” Eggert wrote.

An academic at Mount Royal University in Canada knows something about this. She has just been fired for criticizing Black Lives Matter, the National Post tells. Frances Widdowson, a professor in the Calgary University Department of Economics, Justice and Political Studies, confirmed she was fired in December. Widdowson said she wasn’t surprised by the move, but she was shocked “at how badly the university has deteriorated over the past year and a half.”

The professor, who has been teaching at the university since 2008, was targeted when she claimed that the Black Lives Matter movement “destroyed the university”. A petition calling for her dismissal has more than 6,000 signatures. In a long interview, Widdowson explained that today to criticize the LGBT movement and the new anti-racism means that one immediately finds oneself in a “forbidden zone” of thought.

It would be stupid and shortsighted to think that this is an isolated case or an administration of the mentally ill.

-Zac Kriegman had the ideal curriculum: a business degree, a PhD from Harvard and years of startup and consulting experience. He has spent the past six years at Thomson Reuters Corporation, the international media conglomerate that owns Reuters. In early 2020, Kriegman had assumed the title of Director of Data Science.

-As he tells the City Journal this week, Kriegman was attacked by colleagues and fired via email. He had committed an unforgivable crime: criticizing Black Lives Matter on the company’s internal communications forum. Driven by what he called a “moral obligation” to speak up, Kriegman refused to celebrate the black supremacist fiction and “diversity and inclusion” programs of his he company; on the contrary, he argued that Reuters was exhibiting political bias. Asked to “reform his thoughts”, Kriegman refused and they fired him.

-The director of a leading American academic publication, Harald Uhlig of the University of Chicago, the best-known German economist in the United States, for criticizing Black Lives Matter, likening the organization to flat-earthers because of the campaign to dissolve the departments of police, was ousted from the Journal of Political Economy.

-Leslie Neal-Boylan was fired as director of a nursing school in Massachusetts for writing that “everyone’s lives matter.”

-Cornell Law School professor William Jacobson has been censored by his university for calling Black Lives Matter “anti-American activists who want to destroy capitalism in an act of revenge.”

-Tim Gordon was fired from Garces Memorial High School, a Catholic high school in Bakersfield, California, for calling Black Lives Matter rioters “terrorists” during the looting.

-A University of California professor, Gordon Klein, was fired for refusing to allow more exam time for black students during the Black Lives Matter protests.

-A Vermont principal, says the Wall Street Journal, was fired after posting on Facebook: “I strongly believe Black Lives Matter, but just because I’m not walking around with a BLM sign shouldn’t mean I’m a racist.”

But we would be wrong twice to think that if at universities you incite for the actual killing of whites, the same result will ensue.

A psychiatrist at Yale medical school told a seminar that she dreams of “killing whites,” a professor at Rutgers University argued that “whites must be hunted” and a Cambridge researcher wrote that “the lives of whites they don’t count ”… And none of them have lost their jobs.

The Sorbonne in Paris hosted a seminar against this trend. The organizer, Pierre-André Taguieff, in Le Figaro, explains that this movement wants to “destroy Western civilization by starting to criminalize all its past and rejecting all its legacies. From the more or less playful deconstructionist pedantry this monster that is ‘wokism’,was born a conquering conformism that seems to mark the emergence of a new totalitarian spirit “.

And whoever gets in the way must be eliminated.

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/320328

Le Point: Instead of talking about ” great ethnic replacement “, a topic on everyone’s lips today, you prefer to talk about ” great experience “. Aren’t these two sides of the same phenomenon, one pessimistic, the other optimistic?

Yascha Mounk: The great exchange contains three ideas: that the ethnic diversity
of our societies will come to a bad end; that it is a conscious decision by the elites to eliminate the “ethnic” people; that it can be reversed if you change your policies. While the demographic change we are experiencing is a crucial challenge, its outcome can be positive if responded to appropriately. Second, the Great Experience is not a test on our population, but rather a process that has been set in motion since the 1950s without anyone making a conscious decision to do so.Thirdly, it is unrealistic to attempt to undo history.

Is this irreversible?

Our countries are already multi-ethnic. The only way to put an end to this movement would be extremely cruel: civil war or the expulsion of our compatriots. The big picture experiment is to realise, as we did after the French Revolution, that we don’t know exactly how it should work, but that it must work. The philosopher Pierre Manent has proposed in “Situation de la France” to make a treaty with French Muslims – a departure from the republican view.

Is this a way to make the great experience a success?

No. The idea that a citizen’s social status should depend on his or her ethnic origin or religious beliefs would amount to what the French are sometimes quick to point out: a betrayal of the values of the Republic. And if you look at history, conflicts do not become milder in societies where the civic status of individuals depends on their ethnic or religious background. We have seen what this has led to in Lebanon. Not least because it makes permanent social divisions that are tied to a particular era. Instead, we should interpret our basic principles in such a way that ethnic or cultural minorities can really be part of a society – for example, that one can feel fully French without feeling that one cannot be fully Muslim at the same time. Le Point

https://www.fdesouche.com/2022/01/12/lintellectuel-yascha-mounk-appelle-a-accepter-le-grand-remplacement-la-seule-maniere-dy-mettre-fin-serait-une-guerre-civile-ou-la-persecution-de-nos-concitoyens/

What allegedly happened to the physically disabled widow Lili F. (90) in the toilet of the emergency room of the Dresden-Friedrichstadt hospital is shocking.

According to the indictment, the Iraqi Munthar Al L. (33) forced his way into the toilet and abused her severely. Now he is standing before the Dresden Regional Court “for rape with intentional bodily harm”, according to senior public prosecutor Lorenz Haase.

Lili F., who lives in an old people’s home, came to the emergency room for an X-ray after a fall. In the waiting area she wanted to go to the toilet: “At the door someone suddenly pushed the wheelchair, put me on the toilet. At first I thought it was a nurse. But when he wordlessly rubbed his hands between my legs and groped my chest, I got scared.”

He also allegedly touched the old lady in her private parts, and she has had nightmares ever since. To protect her from having to go to court, the police recorded her statement on video.

The accused (“I drink eight beers and a bottle of ouzo every day”), who lives in Gorbitz with his wife and daughter (9) who have kidney disease, denies everything: “She’s lying! I wanted to help, just lifted her to the toilet.” The trial will continue.

https://www.bild.de/regional/dresden/dresden-aktuell/staatsanwalt-sicher-iraker-33-vergewaltigte-rollstuhl-fahrerin-90-in-klinik-78795546.bild.html###wt_ref=https%3A%2F%2Fm.bild.de%2F&wt_t=1642006813412

The case is currently causing a stir and sensation in France. A rich, elderly Parisian businessman from Versailles, who had taken out many life insurance policies (worth millions) for the benefit of his children and grandchildren, dies of a Covid vaccination (not disputed by the doctors or his life insurers). But now it gets worse: the insurance company does not pay out the insurance money because the deceased was acting at his own risk when he had the Corona vaccination.

The reasoning is quite clear: the insurance company refused to pay to the family because the policy explicitly excludes the use of experimental medicines and treatments (including the Corona vaccination). The family consequently sues the insurance company, but ultimately fails. The judge states:

Here is the judgment summarised mutatis mutandis:

“The court recognises the insurer’s classification of participation in the phase three experiment, the proven harmlessness of which has not been established, in view of the announced side effects, including death, as voluntary assumption of a fatal risk not covered by the contract and legally recognised as suicide. The family has appealed. However, the insurer’s defence is accepted as well-founded and contractually justified, as this publicly disclosed taking of a fatal risk is legally recognised as suicide, as the client was notified and agreed to voluntarily take the risk of death without being obliged or compelled to do so.”

Consequently, death after vaccination is now considered suicide by the courts (at least in France)! Insurers will now start not to pay out life insurance policies on a large scale, since taking a fatal risk due to vaccination de facto excludes them from the contract and it thus becomes void. Unimagined also are the consequences for bank loans etc. So far, nothing has been heard of this scandalous case in the French mainstream media.

The family’s lawyer, Carlo Alberto Brusa, posted the case on social media. (https://www.facebook.com/cab2626/)

https://unser-mitteleuropa.com/corona-hammer-lebensversicherung-steigt-nach-impftod-aus-da-freiwillige-impfung-mit-experimentellem-impfstoff-wie-selbstmord-zaehlt/

The place of worship may have become a “place of radicalisation”, according to the municipality, which refers to “statements made by the former head of the mosque”.

The prefecture recalls that a law “provides that the representative of the state in the department may order the temporary closure of places of worship where the statements made there, the ideas or theories disseminated or the activities carried out incite hatred or violence against a person or a group of persons, or tend to justify or promote such hatred or violence”.

It argues that the Al Madina Al Mounawara mosque “propagates Sharia law, supports radical Islam and thereby promotes separatist secession” and states that ” dubious relations have been established with persons belonging to the radical Islamist movement and advocating pro-jihadist views”. On social networks, the place of worship had spread “hate speech against France, its institutions and laws”, displayed “hate speech against homosexuals or transsexuals” and “explicit anti-Semitic hatred”, the authorities said.

“This decision comes after careful investigative work by the state authorities and numerous indications given directly by the municipality since 2015,” explained City Hall.

Incidentally, on CNews, Gérald Darmanin reported that he had spoken to LR mayor David Lisnard and that he “courageously” supported this decision to initiate administrative closure proceedings.

“For some time, several years even, the mayor has been sounding the alarm about what is happening there, what is being published on social networks,” the director general of services confirmed to 20 Minutes. According to Thierry Migoule, the authorities took this decision because the facility had become “a place of radicalisation” and because of “the opinions of the former head”. 20 Minutes

https://www.fdesouche.com/2022/01/12/cannes-une-mosquee-proche-des-islamistes-du-ccif-visee-par-de-multiples-signalements-depuis-2015-tenait-notamment-des-propos-antisemites-et-haineux-envers-la-france/

The head of the statue of the little Jesus, which was present in the church’s nativity scene, was carefully laid down in the straw next to the rest of the body. A few days earlier, another church less than two kilometres away had also been vandalised.

https://www.valeursactuelles.com/clubvaleurs/societe/six-statues-decapitee-dans-une-eglise-a-poitiers/