Month: October 2021

An outrageous incident at the church of St. John Nepomuk in Vienna’s Leopoldstadt district on Tuesday evening: Shortly before the church in Praterstraße was closed after being open to the faithful for prayer during the day, a young man entered. Shortly afterwards, the 23-year-old from Bangladesh also began to riot.

A wooden cross, a seat in the chancel and some candlesticks were knocked over and damaged by the sacrilegious man. He also vented his rage on vases, flower pots and candles. A member of the parish staff finally stopped him and confronted him. The man seemed very confused, but then agreed to wait with him for the police. The officers arrested the thug for the time being. Nothing is known about his motive. The amount of damage is also still being determined. No worshippers were injured, as the church was already empty at the time of the crime.

The church on the street Praterstraße was built between 1841 and 1846, dedicated to St. John Nepomuk and celebrates its 175th anniversary in October with numerous activities. Nearly 5000 Catholics currently live in the parish area. St. John Nepomuk is considered one of the best-known Bohemian saints. There are more than 33,000 statues of this saint in Europe alone. The 14th century priest and martyr was canonised 300 years ago.

https://www.krone.at/2536343

According to actu Hauts-de-Seine, the arrested man is an asylum seeker from Bangladesh who had gone to the OFII offices to request accommodation. As the office staff could not comply with his request, the man, who was not known to the police, returned armed with two knives. He pointed one of his weapons at a police patrol who arrived on the scene. The police officers drew their weapons and used a stun gun to arrest the man, who fell to the ground paralysed.Actu.fr

Deux longs couteaux, des passants insouciants, et des policiers nationaux de Montrouge (92) qui ont probablement évité un drame par leur seul courage.
Intervention superbement bien gérée, bravo collègues.
De l’utilité de l’armement intermédiaire et d’une bonne formation. #Taser pic.twitter.com/cPkRMcR6ov

— Linda Kebbab (@LindaKebbab) October 22, 2021

https://www.fdesouche.com/2021/10/22/un-individu-porteur-de-couteaux-seme-la-peur-et-menace-des-policiers-il-a-ete-interpelle/

Doubts about official SARS-CoV-2 figures from the German government have increased: Almost half of the country fear an eternal Corona dictatorship.

A study by the Hans Böckler Foundation, which is part of the German Trade Union Federation (DGB), uncovered interesting facts in Germany. Notably, the survey of 5000 employees did not only deal with trade union issues or questions about how Corona affects work or what effects the virus has on the workplace.

Instead, the study by the DGB showed that many Germans see democracy and freedom in danger in their country. The official Corona figures announced by various politicians are also distrusted. For the authors of the study this has been an indication of a “susceptibility to conspiracy myths”.

The study highlighted distrust in politics, doubts about the Corona policy and “conspiracy theories”, said Andreas Hövermann, sociologist and employee at the research institute of the union’s own foundation.

Between June 29 and July 13, 2021, some 5000 participants were asked about six premises for the study. And it was also revealed that for all questions, except for the one about the danger of the virus, approval has increased since last year. The questions from the survey and the responses are listed below:

•The current restrictions on freedoms pose a threat to democracy. (36 percent in agreement)
•I am concerned that the restrictions on fundamental rights will not be completely lifted after the crisis. (43 percent in agreement)
•I don’t think the coronavirus is as dangerous as it is often claimed. (27 percent in agreement)
•I have doubts about the official Corona numbers. (43 percent in agreement)
•I can imagine that behind the pandemic there is an elite that wants to create a new world order. (20 percent in agreement)
•I can imagine that the pandemic will be used by elites to enforce the interests of the rich and powerful. (32 percent in agreement)

Union for the powerful, not for ordinary people

For the union researchers , the result of the study has been an alarm signal. It supposedly shows that a fifth of those questioned were susceptible to Corona doubts and so-called conspiracy myths. The implication of the trade union’s research does not augur well for the mainstream political parties either: They noticed that in a large cohort of the study participants, the commitment to “established democratic parties” was vanishingly small. However, the AfD was the only party that could convince this clientele.

Apparently, less attention was paid to the fact that citizens were extremely skeptical of the restrictions on their freedoms with 43 percent of those surveyed expressing their doubts about the official Corona numbers. The logical conclusion would have been to finally open up a public debate on the issue. Instead, the “researchers” recommend refuting this “disinformation”.

Healthy understanding of democracy

The study actually showed a healthy understanding of democracy because people had questioned politicians and wanted to be informed without reservation. Under normal circumstances, responsible citizens do not readily accept conflicting political statements and government propaganda. And there was actually a very specific trade union issue among their concerns.

After all, 32 percent could imagine “that the pandemic would be used by elites to enforce the interests of the rich and powerful”. Evidently, the assumption is that an honest trade union would provide a reasonable solution to end the crisis for their members. The rich have experienced phenomenal asset growth, while the general population had to tighten their belts and suffer the economic consequences of the health decrees.

Embarrassing for the elite

In June this year, reported the German daily FAZ, the results of a survey by the renowned Allensbach Institute showed that around half of the respondents believed that they could no longer express their opinion freely in their country.

Those who want to believe the mainstream media consider the discussion about the renaming of cities, pharmacies, and chocolates which contain the part of the name “Neger” or “Mohren”, to be of great social relevance. Well-known news anchors stutter everywhere on television and make linguistically nonsensical pauses, choking sounds and grunts to show how gender-aware they are. “Equality”, “diversity” and “justice” are certainly the most frequently used terms.

Despite this, the FAZ correctly noted: “Even today, a strikingly large number of citizens complain about strong social control, have the impression that an attempt is being made to dictate to them in detail how they should behave, and many have the feeling that they cannot defend themselves.”

Freedom of expression in free fall

In the opinion of many citizens, freedom of expression is currently worse than ever in Germany: Only 45 percent of those surveyed believe that one can freely express a political opinion. And the survey also underscored that over the past twenty years, the assessment of the respondents has deteriorated considerably.

This means that, in the opinion of the respondents, the climate of opinion is increasingly deteriorating. In times of “political correctness” and “cancel culture”, the common citizen is increasingly afraid of being socially marginalized.

A fifth of Austrian students did not buy Corona narrative

The communication scientist Jürgen Grimm carried out a remarkable study at the University of Vienna also in June this year. In the course of a survey of 600 students, he determined how “susceptible” they were to “conspiracy theories” due to the Corona situation. His conclusion: was that 20 percent of the students were “hostile” in their worldview. They were questioning who and what was behind Corona policies. Grimm found this fundamentally problematic and labeled them “conspiracy theorists” too.

“A smaller proportion – around 20 percent – are prone to conspiracy theories. They have a hostile view of the world. They are no longer just threatened – objectively we all are – but look for someone to blame, an ‘enemy’,” explained Grimm in an interview.

https://freewestmedia.com/2021/10/22/germans-distrust-official-corona-figures-fear-a-health-dictatorship/

Since January of this year, 21 women have been killed in Switzerland. Foreign perpetrators from cultures that despise women are disproportionately represented in this sad record. Many of them were already known to the police for committing violent crimes and making threats.
The Swiss People’s Party (SVP) is now demanding the effective implementation of the initiative to deport criminal foreigners, a tightening of naturalisation procedures and zero tolerance for violent criminals.

Domestic violence is a sad reality also in Switzerland. The Zurich Cantonal Police alone are called out 18 times a day for such acts of violence. In some cases, women die. Since January, 21 women have died in Switzerland, last year there were 20, according to the Federal Statistical Office (FSO). The Federal Office for Gender Equality (FOGE) estimates that 25 people are killed by domestic violence every year. There is also one attempted murder every week.

The statistics also show us that it is mainly a matter of immigrant violence. In most cases, the perpetrators are in fact immigrants. More than half of the homicides committed in 2021 were committed by foreigners, often by non-integrated men from Turkey, the Balkans, Arab or African countries, in short, from countries where women have few or no rights. As the SVP already mentioned in its 2019 position paper “Crime has a name: Mass immigration”, the majority of serious sexual offences are committed by non-integrated immigrants. In many cases, the perpetrators have been known to the police for a long time because of threats and violence.It is astonishing that the red-green left deliberately avoids these connections for ideological reasons. Of all political parties, it is not only absurd but also dangerous that the Socialist Party (SP) in particular, which claims to be a pioneer in the fight for women’s rights, deliberately turns a blind eye to this fact. Instead of speaking openly and calling a spade a spade in order to expel criminal, non-integrated foreigners, the red-green left protects these criminals. It prefers to create more women’s shelters, to speak of “toxic masculinity” and to call all men “suspicious”. Anyone who denounces these real effects of mass immigration is accused of racism.

Instead of effectively protecting women, the SP and the Greens prefer to import even more violence by demanding the admission of tens of thousands of migrants from Afghanistan and Syria. In the federal parliament, the same parties systematically reject all proposals aimed at strengthening measures that would better protect women while punishing perpetrators of violence more harshly and effectively.

The SVP demands that:

• Non-integrated foreigners who are known to the police for domestic violence and threats have their residence permits revoked and their social benefits cancelled.

• naturalisations are only granted with a probationary period; anyone who commits a criminal offence within 5 years of naturalisation or, in the case of young people, up to 5 years after reaching the age of majority, has their Swiss citizenship revoked.

• The initiative on the deportation of criminal foreigners, which was adopted by the people in 2010, is finally to be implemented. If deportation is not possible, violent criminals should be taken into deportation custody. Instead of more women’s shelters, we must create deportation prisons for criminal foreigners.

• There should be zero tolerance for sexual assault and violence against women.

• That marriages where the spouse is under 16 are automatically classified as presumed forced marriages and thus a criminal offence.

• The state no longer spares criminals and perpetrators of violence. In the upcoming harmonisation of the penal framework, the threats of punishment must correspond to reality. Specifically, suspended fines are ineffective, which is why they must be abolished, just like the “remission”.

The SVP parliamentary group will submit several motions on this issue during the winter parliamentary session.

https://unser-mitteleuropa.com/gewalt-gegen-frauen-hat-eine-definition-nicht-integrierte-einwanderer-besonders-aus-dem-islamischen-kulturkreis/

While the birth of the new SPD-Greens-Liberals government was being discussed in Germany, Angela Merkel was in Istanbul on her last visit to President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. “Exchange of views on the process of Turkey’s rapprochement with the EU”, was the formula used for the meeting.“The fact that Merkel took the time to visit Erdogan shortly before her retirement shows the great importance that Turkey has always had for her,” comments the Neue Zürcher Zeitung. “In exchange for the migrant agreement, Merkel was ready to ignore the threat to freedom of expression, the rule of law and democracy in Turkey. She also accepted the fact that her visit was seen as an aid to the campaign for Erdogan in view of the parliamentary elections”.Not a word from the Chancellor came on the “sofagate”, the humiliation inflicted by Erdogan on Ursula von der Leyen, Merkel’s party colleague in the CDU and now head of the European Commission, left without a chair by the Turkish president.

“On February 8, 2016, Merkel was in Turkey and gave a press conference there. Imprisoned for a newspaper article, I followed her on a small screen to my prison cell in Istanbul ”. This opens a very harsh article in the main German weekly Die Zeit by the most famous Turkish anti-Erdogan journalist, Can Dündar. “The person who wrote that article will pay dearly,” Erdogan said in 2015 after the Cumhuriyet newspaper, then headed by Dündar, published exclusive information on the delivery of weapons to Syrian Islamist rebels at the hands of Turkish intelligence. Dündar was sentenced to 27 years in prison for “espionage”. He then decided to go into exile in Germany, after having also escaped an attack outside a court.

“It was of great importance what Merkel would have said as the ‘Chancellor of the free world'” writes Dündar again in the Zeit, using quotation marks. “A colleague intervened in the press conference and reminded Merkel that I was about to be sentenced to life imprisonment. He asked why the German government was silent: ‘Is this attitude the price for the refugee deal? Does Germany reveal its values? ‘

“You can imagine how excited I was in front of the screen. Wouldn’t Merkel, who described the fall of the Berlin Wall as the most beautiful of her everyday days, have said a few words about a regime that has locked the free press behind walls? Unfortunately, however, the Chancellor said: ‘We talk about everything, including the working conditions of journalists’. ‘Working conditions’? Was that all? You can imagine what a journalist in prison felt when she heard this sentence ”.

The next day, concludes Dündar, the newspapers wrote that a complete agreement had been reached with Merkel on the refugee crisis. “Apparently, just as the question implied, the German government’s silence was the price to pay for the deal. But the reporter who asked the question was Deniz Yücel. When Ankara realized that Berlin could be blackmailed on refugees, he too was arrested a year later. If you ask me which side Germany is on in this great battle, I can only show you, deeply disappointed, a photo of Mrs. Merkel on Erdoğan’s golden throne ”.

A dossier should be put together on how Angela Merkel capitulated to Erdogan, since she gave the green light to the Turkish president’s request for a trial against the German comedian Jan Bohmermann, author of a satirical poem against her. On Merkel, Böhmermann said, “she made me fillets and served a neurotic despot for tea.” And the Wall Street Journalheadline read “Merkel’s Road to Moral Surrender.”

Why so much German subjection to Turkey?

The famous French philosopher Pierre Manent in the latest issue of Le Grand Continentevokes a cultural motivation: “Why were the European institutions so eager to see Turkey enter? To show that Europe was not a Christian club. It’s a bit perverse. If we try to be honest, we must recognize that Turkey had a homogeneous Muslim population, because Christians were forced to flee Turkey in 1923 following the Greco-Turkish war. Thus, at the very moment that Europe made the choice to leave behind its national past, it simultaneously encouraged the integration into Europe of a nation marked by a nationalism that had no intention of opening itself up to others. It was a way to show that we weren’t a Christian club. I think this is a particularly dangerous position”.

But there is also an economic motivation, as revealed by an investigation by the German newspaper Die Welt. 100 billion dollars of European banks invested in Turkey. The main Spanish bank BBVA is particularly involved. It owns 50 percent of Garanti Bank, the third largest Turkish bank. The Italian UniCredit, in turn, has a 41 per cent stake in Yapi Kredi, the fourth largest Turkish bank. Just open the economic news for the past two months. Erdogan has just obtained 82 million euros from the German bank KfW for migrant programs. Then 3.1 billion euros from Germany and other European countries for the energy transition. In August, another 1.2 billion euros from Deutsche Bank.

In recent days Erdogan, who controls a third of German mosques, obtained from Cologne, the “capital” of Turkish Islam in Germany, the announcement that the Friday prayer will be held with loudspeakers from 50 mosques (Erdogan was present at the inauguration). Merkel did not say a word about Cologne, but Lale Akgün of the SPD did: “The permission for the call of the muezzin from the mosque is a bow to Erdogan’s activities in Germany.” And Ahmad Mansour in Focus, who talks about the “conquest by Erdogan”.

It could only end like this by putting together a treasure trove of economic interests, a German chancellor who never seems to have been guided by any principle or ideal but by a boundless political cynicism, and a Turkish neo-sultan who has always affirmed that “mosques are ours barracks, domes our helmets, minarets our bayonets and the faithful our soldiers ”

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/315497

According to science reporter Alex Berenson, that may not be exactly how the company phrased the failure of their product in a press release, but everyone has drawn that conclusion.

The only reasonable way to understand Pfizer’s press release claiming that the booster is 95 percent effective, is to recall that the booster is given to people who have already been jabbed.

“And when they tested a booster against a placebo in those people, they found a 95 percent reduction in disease in people who received the booster (for a total of 11 weeks after they received the booster, excluding the first week, because science – by which I mean because including that week would not help their results).

“Where have you heard that figure before? Oh yeah, it is exactly the same relative risk reduction they claimed in the pivotal trial last year, when they tested the initial dose against placebo.”

According to Berenson, the only reasonable explanation was that the booster was providing temporary protection similar to what the first two-dose series did. “So where’s the protection from the initial two doses?” Berenson rightly wanted to know, suggesting that boosters were only given because the shots do not work.

“There is one difference, though. The absolute risk appeared at least two to three times higher in the vaccinated people in this trial than in unvaccinated people in the initial trial – 110 infections in 5000 people in 10 weeks, compared to 162 infections in 20 000 people in about the same period.”

This was clear evidence that vaccines do not work, he pointed out. Berenson added that the Pfizer press release included no specific safety data.

https://freewestmedia.com/2021/10/22/pfizer-biontech-vaccine-becomes-useless-after-11-months/

The Conseil d’Etat has ruled against the regional government led by Xavier Bertrand, which refused to pay a subsidy for a private Muslim high school in Lille suspected of being partly financed by Qatar.

This is a defeat for the Hauts-de-France region in its fight against the private Muslim school Averroès in Lille (Nord). The Conseil d’Etat has just rejected an appeal by the region against a decision by the Lille Administrative Court last March. This decision obliged the Hauts-de-France Region to pay a subsidy of almost 300,000 euros to this private high school, which is suspected of being partly financed by an NGO from Qatar.

Xavier Bertrand, the region’s president and candidate for the LR presidential candidacy, refused to pay this sum, which is due for the 2019-2020 year. The amount is the same as the subsidy that the region normally pays to private high schools under contracts. However, the Region is legally obliged to pay this contribution as it is an institution established under an association contract with the public education system of the private high school of which it is the sponsoring association,” said the Lille Administrative Court in a decision upheld by the Council of State on October 12.

Xavier Bertrand and the Averroès School have been at dispute since the publication of the book “Qatar Papers” by journalists Georges Malbrunot and Christian Chesnot. It emerged that the school had received funding from a Qatari non-governmental organisation. This was confirmed by a report of the Inspectorate General of Education, Sports and Research (IGESR), led by Xavier Bertrand, which stated “that the school had received a loan of 800,000 euros from the Mosque of Mulhouse, which was repaid thanks to a donation of 850,000 euros from the NGO Qatar Charity in 2014”.

The exclusion of about twenty female high school students from public schools in Lille against the backdrop of cases of Islamic veiling in the mid-1990s prompted the introduction of the “Averroès project” in 2003, which allows young girls to wear the veil at school. This public school, based on the model of Catholic schools, was promoted by the Union of Islamic Organisations in France (UOIF), which is close to the Muslim Brotherhood. Averroes High School, named after the famous Arab philosopher who tried to reconcile Plato’s thought with the Islamic faith in the 12th century, has long been an educational model. The school ranked first in France in 2013.

The school sparked controversy in 2015 following the Charlie Hebdo attack, after Soufiane Zitouni, a teacher, resigned. He accused his former school of “propagating Islamism” and referred to the “quasi-cultural anti-Semitism of many students” and “an unhealthy and dangerous mix of religion and politics”. He also accused the school administration, which is said to be close to the Muslim Brotherhood, of using a two-faced discourse, of being “polite” in the media and of ” sneakily spreading a view of Islam that is nothing other than Islamism”.

https://www.marianne.net/societe/laicite-et-religions/les-hauts-de-france-contraints-de-verser-300-000-euros-au-lycee-prive-musulman-averroes

https://t.co/DGO5tt8wFq

— djibril Olivier (@GervaisOlivier5) October 21, 2021

The label “Villes et Villages Fleuris” (” Flowering Villages and Towns”) has been given a competitor. The youth of the Rassemblement National have decided to reclaim the brand created in 1959 under the aegis of General de Gaulle. The promotion of green spaces is replaced by the denunciation of another kind of green. “We want to expose the agreements and collaborations of certain town halls with Islamism and communitarianism,” explains Aleksandar Nikolic, national youth delegate.

To inaugurate his sign “Villes et Villages Islamistes” (Islamist Villages and Towns), the top candidate of the RN list in Centre-Val de Loire in the last regional elections did not hesitate for long and chose the town of Trappes in the department of Yvelines. Around 3pm on Wednesday, he and two members of his team reached the western entrance of the town. They parked on Rue Paul Verlaine, near the town’s McDonald’s. With their brand new sign clasped under their arms, the three men walk to the entrance sign of Trappes, located a few metres away. After taking a few photos to document his action, Aleksandar Nikolic covers the traditional “ville fleurie” sign with his own creation. Here, the flowery notes have been replaced by veiled women. In the case of Trappes, there are four. The maximum rating for this “national mark of submission to Islamist laws”. “We are talking about the city from which, in all of Europe, most jihadists have left for Syria,” says Aleksandar Nikolic.

https://www.valeursactuelles.com/clubvaleurs/politique/info-va-a-trappes-les-jeunes-du-rn-lance-le-label-villes-et-villages-islamistes/

#13novembre
Aurore dit avoir reçu une lettre de menaces à son domicile, signée Allah Akbar, et l'avoir dit au policier. "On m'a dit de revenir quand j'en aurai une deuxième"

— Aurélie Sarrot (@aureliesarrot) October 21, 2021

https://www.fdesouche.com/2021/10/21/un-pere-dune-victime-du-bataclan-ces-individus-il-y-en-a-des-dizaines-de-milliers-dans-notre-pays-faut-pas-se-faire-dillusion-des-attentats-y-en-aura-dautres/