
What at first glance appears to be the next outrageous and scandalous demand from a troublemaker with an affinity for terrorism and even a proven IS supporter is actually just the logical consequence of the situation in Germany 10 years after Angela Merkel’s historic sabotage of an asylum system previously based on the rule of law and once functioning border protection: the convicted Merkel guest and Syrian Abdulhadi B. has been obliged to leave the country since 2018 – but he cannot be deported because of the ‘civil war in Syria’, which has been over for years. With a grin, B. is now turning the German state’s self-imposed restrictions and powerlessness against the state itself – and declares that he is prepared to leave Germany if he is paid 144,000 euros to do so. This caveman has got it; he is clever!
What seems brazen is in principle only logical: a state that allows itself to be made a fool of like the Federal Republic of Germany, whose Basic Law, which was once conceived for completely different cases and basic assumptions, now has to serve as the basis for abuse and adventurous impositions against all normal common sense, deserves nothing better. We cannot even be angry with the “refugee”; it is our own fault that we a) tolerate and support such beings here, b) continue to tolerate them, c) cannot get rid of them and d) do not at least send them to detention pending deportation. Our politics would have it no other way. The case of Abdulhadi B. is yet another symptom of the failure of German migration policy.
The fact that Abdulhadi B. is shamelessly exploiting Syria’s “ security situation” would not even be the problem; this probably applies to the majority of the approximately 1 million Syrians in Germany. The problem is rather that the anti-German policy of self-destruction continues in this country and is currently being cemented in the next government for another four years. The fact that a staunch supporter of a terrorist organisation can stay in Germany and even demand money to leave the country shows how dysfunctional the system is, but it is no longer surprising. The Germans have already paid huge sums of money to governments to take back their own citizens, who are flown out by the federal police in adventurous and life-threatening deportation flights at huge logistical expense – either in the form of special payments subject to secrecy (also in cash) or in the form of ‘development aid’.
The German fools who are financing this folly with their tax money are still playing along and keeping quiet. Meanwhile, the inability of politicians to even effectively control people like B., who of course have no right to be here, let alone deport them, is undermining trust in state institutions – not to mention security and social cohesion.