Deported Afghan rapist seeks re-entry into Germany under human rights laws

Screengrab youtube

A convicted Afghan asylum seeker, deported for his involvement in the drugging and gang rape of a 14-year-old girl, is seeking to return to Germany, citing family ties.

The Afghan, identified as Mukthar N., was part of a group that drugged and raped a 14-year-old girl for hours in Illerkirchberg. His case caused national outrage, particularly when it emerged that after serving a 26-month prison sentence, he was briefly placed back in the community without warning to residents.

Police classified him as a high-risk offender with the potential to commit further sexual crimes, and he was even placed under police protection for a short time. After considerable backlash, the man was deported back to Afghanistan in August 2024.

His lawyer is now actively appealing for his re-entry under human rights laws protecting his right to life with his family — he has a wife and child in Baden-Württemberg.

Bild reported how he recently made an emotional plea in a TV report in which he said tearfully, “I want to see my child, I want to be there for my wife.”

When he was deported, the child rapist was barred from re-entry to Germany for six years, but just months later in November 2024, he attempted to appeal his deportation in order to return — a request that was denied in January.

His eventual deportation in August 2024 was part of a collective flight carrying 28 Afghan criminals back to their home country — the first such repatriation since the Taliban took power in 2021.

Illerkirchberg Mayor Markus Häußler described the deportation as the removal of a “thorn in the flesh,” expressing relief on behalf of local residents.

Human rights laws are frequently misused to launch legal challenges and thwart legal challenges to deportations from Europe, with thousands of Afghan criminals still residing in Germany.

Following a brief pause during the election campaign, flights relocating Afghan refugees from a German-managed reception center in Islamabad, Pakistan, have resumed, with over 3,000 individuals expected to be brought to Europe in the coming weeks. This is despite previous concerns about lax security checks.

In 2021, then-Federal Minister of the Interior Horst Seehofer (CSU) revealed that at least 20 of the Afghans evacuated by the Bundeswehr had failed security screenings. Among them were convicted rapists and individuals previously deported from Germany due to security concerns. Reports also indicated that some evacuees had ties to counter-terrorism watchlists.

The political landscape has further complicated the issue. Chancellor-in-waiting Friedrich Merz, who previously promised sweeping immigration reforms during the election campaign, has softened his stance. After the possibility of forming a “Grand Coalition” with the Social Democrats (SPD) emerged, Merz stated that “no one has any desire to close the borders.”

Any agreement with the SPD is likely to see the culture of mass immigration into Germany continue with reports on Wednesday that the far-left party’s Migration and Diversity Working Group wants to reject the hypothetical hardline course set by the CDU.

The group argues that Germany needs 500,000 legal migrants every year on top of asylum seekers who usually enter the country illegally, which it argues would help replace retiring workers.

https://rmx.news/germany/deported-afghan-rapist-seeks-re-entry-into-germany-under-human-rights-laws/

Police raid Munich immigration office over suspected asylum bribery

German police have searched the immigration office in Munich on suspicions that employees there took bribes in exchange for positive asylum decisions.

The raid on on March 11 came after Munich prosecutors had launched an investigation into five current and one former employee of the city’s administration.

They are suspected of making illegal decisions “in numerous cases” related to immigration law, the public prosecutor’s office confirmed to the media.

The organisation itself contacted the police after irregularities in residence permits were found during an internal audit at the office.

In the first half of 2024, an employee had allegedly observed a man approaching people at the immigration facility and offering assistance in exchange for payment.

After the man returned to the premises, despite being banned, the authority initiated the internal audit.

It revealed that this individual’s clients consistently had appointments with the same set of clerks. Since then, evidence has been systematically collected regarding this matter.

Five suspects are currently in custody, while Süddeutsche Zeitung reported a total of seven under investigation.

Investigators also searched private apartments related to the suspects.

Authorities said they suspected bribery and forgery of documents took place between May 2022 and January 2024. One of the suspects allegedly facilitated contacts with foreigners, forged documents and arranged payments to city administration employees.

Since 2022, the Munich immigration office, which employs around 3,800 people, has been headed by Hanna Sammüller-Gradl, of The Greens party.

In February 2024, she told the media she wanted to make the authority more friendly to migrants and described the debate about deportations as a “sham”.

Sammüller-Gradl complained that “generalising slogans against certain groups of people are no longer only uttered by the parties on the far-right, but also by those who actually locate themselves in the middle of society”.

On March 12, the parliamentary group leader of The Greens, Rosa List, Mona Fuchs, said: “There must be no taking advantage, from any municipal employee. This zero-tolerance policy with regard to corruption and taking advantage of it naturally also applies to the district administration department.”

She stressed that it was the organisation itself that pushed ahead with the internal investigations over its suspicions and informed the investigating authorities.

Manuel Pretzl, chairman of the parliamentary group of the Christian Social Union and Free Voters in the Munich City Council, has demanded “complete” transparency on the matter.

Police raid Munich immigration office over suspected asylum bribery

Migrants Terrorize Spanish Town Over Imam’s Eviction

Kalilu Diwara, the imam at the center of the dispute
Photo: @AlbertoTarradas on X, 13 March 2025

The historic Catalan town of Salt has suffered two consecutive nights of riots following the arrest of a sub-Saharan imam. He had been evicted from a house he had illegally occupied for five years without paying rent. In response, immigrant groups and radical left-wing activists have vandalised property, attacked the police, set fire to dumpsters, and damaged urban infrastructure.

The first episode of violence occurred when around 200 people gathered in front of a local police station, throwing stones and eggs at the officers. The police deployed riot units to control the situation. The second night was even more intense, with hooded individuals attacking law enforcement, setting urban infrastructure on fire, and spreading chaos in the streets. The incidents resulted in six arrested, three of them minors, and one officer sustaining minor injuries.

The disturbances have affected public safety and heightened the sense of disorder in the municipality. Residents worry about these incidents becoming normal and the lack of effective deterrents. Rioters have openly boasted about their actions without fear of legal consequences.

Salt City Council, led by the separatist party Esquerra Republicana de Catalunya (ERC), has granted the evicted imam a social housing unit despite him failing to meet the established vulnerability requirements. The council defended the decision, claiming they wanted to avoid “fueling the far right,” but the move has sparked outrage among residents and criticism from the political opposition.

The local government, instead of condemning the riots, focussed on criticising evictions carried out by banks and investment funds. Many see this as siding with the rioters rather than supporting law enforcement and restoring order.

The decision has also raised concerns about fairness in allocating social housing, as many families in similar situations do not receive the same preferential treatment as the imam. People also worry that this concession could set a precedent, encouraging future violent demonstrations to pressure institutions into granting special benefits.

Salt residents have expressed their concerns about the increasing crime and violence in the municipality. Testimonies from some rioters have revealed the level of impunity with which certain groups act. “We are in Salt. Look at everything we’ve destroyed; we’ve shut down the streets, and no one can leave Salt,” one participant boasted.

The situation in Salt reflects a broader issue in Catalonia, where a combination of unintegrated immigration, radical activism, and political permissiveness creates an increasingly volatile situation. 

But it is just a symptom of a broader trend spreading across Europe. The welfare system cannot sustain the constant arrival of millions of immigrants across the continent. There is no political, social, or economic capacity to absorb such a large influx of people, leading to poverty, crime, and violent outbreaks like this one.

https://europeanconservative.com/articles/news/salt-migrant-riots-imam-spain-catalonia/

German AfD politician says in fiery speech abortion treats unborn as second-class citizens

Vanessa Behrendt Screenshot youtube

German politician Vanessa Behrendt has given a passionate pro-life speech, calling out leftist parties for allowing the killing of babies and creating a two-tier society of the born and the unborn.

”Dear Madam President, dear survivors, I realize that none of you were aborted. You were all born,” Behrendt began her speech in the parliament of Lower Saxony.

The Alternative for Germany (AfD) politician was immediately admonished by state parliament vice president Barbara Otte-Kinast for using the word “survivors” in the context of abortion.

“Okay… then dear people who were not aborted, because you were all born. Not from a birthing person, not from a person with a bonus hole, not from parent 1 or parent 2, but from a woman, from your mother,” Behrendt continued.

“You were also not born as anything but as a human being, a human being with rights.”

“ I warmly congratulate you on this because not everyone is so lucky. We are all survivors of a system that denies well over 100,000 people a year their most fundamental right – the right to life. A two-tier society of the born on the one hand and the unborn on the other.”

“ A society that kills. Not because it is allowed to but because it can. Because you here, SPD and Greens, have agreed that it is okay to kill babies.”

Behrendt gave her speech in the context of a debate around a bill regarding so-called “self-determined pregnancy.” The motion, which was ultimately passed with the votes from the Socialist SPD and the Greens, contained several provisions, including easier access to abortion and the demand for nationwide legalization of abortion in the first twelve weeks of pregnancy. Although the motion was accepted at the state level, abortion remains regulated at the federal level in the Criminal Code.

Behrendt is the politician who acts as Family policy spokesperson for the AfD in Lower Saxony.

“ My body, my choice, you say,” she stated. “I say that the freedom of the born ends where the freedom of the unborn begins. There is no qualitative difference between the born and the unborn. They are all human beings.”

“ In your political youth groups, they like to call unborn babies clumps of cells. I could say the same about you. You would be clumps of cells in suits. Every human being begins life with exactly two cells. One cell from their mother, one from their father. By the time a person is an adult, there will be around 37 trillion cells.”

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/german-afd-politician-says-unborn-are-being-killed-as-second-class-citizens-in-fiery-pro-life-speech/?utm_source=most_recent&utm_campaign=catholic

Berlin school forces children to celebrate Ramadan

A letter from the Zuckmayer School in the Neukölln district of Berlin has caused displeasure among parents. Not only were the seventh-graders invited to take part in the Islamic fast-breaking (iftar), but attendance was also compulsory.

Parents were asked to bring their children food, for which a special list was drawn up. Breaking the fast is a central ritual in the Islamic fasting month of Ramadan and only takes place after sunset.

Particularly controversial: according to the letter, the event was to take place in the evening and lessons would be cancelled elsewhere. This called the Berlin education authorities into action. This made it clear that religious events at state schools are voluntary and that no lessons may be cancelled. After consultation with the school inspectorate, the invitation was revised accordingly. The school has not yet issued a statement.

Ramadan also poses challenges for many schools in Austria. More and more young children – some as young as primary school age – are abstaining from eating and drinking during lessons. Educators and experts are sounding the alarm. Vienna primary school unionist Thomas Krebs warned of the consequences: ‘Without sufficient hydration, physical education is hardly possible. In addition, many children suffer from poor concentration, hypoglycaemia and exhaustion – some literally fall over.’

Peer pressure also plays a significant role. According to Krebs, there are cases of pupils pressurising their peers to fast as well. This can lead to children abstaining from food for fear of social exclusion, even if they have health problems.

https://jungefreiheit.de/politik/deutschland/2025/berliner-schule-zwingt-kinder-zu-ramadan-feier/

Court Tells Indiana Department Of Corrections To Arrange Urgent Plastic Surgery For Transgender Baby Killer

A federal judge has ordered the Indiana Department of Corrections to arrange urgent “gender affirming surgery” for a trans-identified male convicted of murdering a baby. In a shocking decision handed down last week, Judge Richard Young ruled that Autumn Cordellioné, born Jonathan Richardson, was suffering from “irreparable harm” from not having the various plastic surgeries he had requested, despite the fact that a psychiatrist testified that Richardson was not suffering from gender dysphoria.

The order is the latest update in a lengthy case that Richardson first filed in 2023 with the assistance of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). The suit was intended to challenge House Bill 1569, which took effect in July of 2023 and bans the spending of state dollars on sexual reassignment surgery for inmates. The bill, the ACLU argues, “mandates deliberate indifference to a serious medical need and therefore violates the Eighth Amendment.”

In the suit, ACLU lawyers refer to Richardson as an “adult transgender female prisoner confined in a male institution,” and complains that “the total ban on gender-affirming surgery violates [his] right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment.”

Among a list of demands prepared by Richardson and presented as evidence in court was a document titled “Surgeries to Reach My Ideal Self.” The first item on the list, the court heard, was a “vagina,” followed by: breast implants, a brow lift, a brow reduction, a tummy tuck, gluteal implants (BBL), a uterus transplant, hair removal, and wigs.

However, during court proceedings Richardson stated that he had amended his demands to two surgeries, an orchiectomy and a penile inversion. In September of 2024, the Indiana Department of Corrections (IDOC) was ordered to arrange the surgeries, but quickly encountered issues as the only provider of “gender affirming” surgery in the state refused to accept incarcerated patients.

IDOC later filed a motion to further challenge Richardson’s demands and the ACLU’s claims, this time entering testimony from an independent psychiatrist they had retained to offer a comprehensive analysis of Richardson’s preparedness for surgery.

After meeting with Richardson to perform an evaluation, Dr. Kelsey Beers concluded that Richardson was not suffering from gender dysphoria, but instead had “attention seeking” personality disorders that were not indicated for any medical interventions.

From February court records submitted by the IDOC.

ACLU lawyers immediately disputed Dr. Beers’ findings, arguing that she was not competent on matters of “gender” for her testimony to be taken into consideration by the court.

On March 5, Judge Richard Young ruled that Richardson “has demonstrated that she is suffering irreparable harm and will continue to suffer such harm unless she is provided gender-affirming surgery. When balancing this harm against the harm Defendant would face if preliminary relief were granted, and when the impact of preliminary relief on the public is considered, the court finds that the balance of harms favors the issuance of a preliminary injunction.”

He then renewed the injunction demanding the IDOC seek to arrange Richardson’s surgery at the earliest possible opportunity.

Richardson is currently serving a 55-year sentence for the murder of his 11-month-old stepdaughter. As previously reported by Reduxx, Richardson had been left to care for the child while her mother was at work. That night, he was visited by friends who observed he was “acting strangely” and refused to invite them in the house as he normally would.

Jonathan C. Richardson. Photo Courtesy of the Indiana Department of Corrections.

Despite claiming the little girl was sleeping, Richardson had loud music playing in the home, and his guests noted that he appeared to have a fresh, bleeding tattoo of the child’s name carved into his arm.

Later that night, after his friends left, Richardson went to his neighbor and asked him to call 911, claiming the child was unresponsive. When emergency personnel arrived, they were briefly able to resuscitate the girl, but she died shortly after being rushed to the hospital.

Richardson was interviewed by police, who noted he was “calm and unemotional” during questioning, and his story about what happened to the baby changed dramatically over the course of the two interviews conducted.

At first, Richardson claimed he found the baby unresponsive after doing some household chores. But in the next interview, Richardson said the child was being “fussier than usual” and he attempted to throw her up in the air repeatedly in an effort to calm her down. He said her “head bopped forward and back up in a rough type of a manner,” and that the child continued to cry so he proceeded to shake her aggressively in an effort to calm her down.

During a failed appeals hearing, detectives from the case recounted how Richardson “physically showed” how he had manhandled the girl, getting up out of his chair and demonstrating the action in a rough manner.

An autopsy subsequently found that the baby had died of asphyxiation by manual strangulation.

Richardson was booked awaiting a court hearing, and would later tell a prison official “all I know is I killed the little fucking bitch.” He was ultimately found guilty and sentenced to 55 years in prison for the horrific crime.

Richardson is currently incarcerated at the Branchville Correctional Facility, a men’s institution.

Last year, Richardson filed a complaint against the prison’s chaplain, Tony Gray, after he converted to non-denominational Islam and was allegedly denied access to a hijab.

https://reduxx.info/exclusive-details-court-tells-indiana-department-of-corrections-to-arrange-urgent-plastic-surgery-for-transgender-baby-killer/

‘You dirty Jew, you caused a massacre in Gaza”: Man was threatened and violently attacked in Villeurbanne, France

On Saturday March 8 at 10pm, the resident of Cours Damidot was attacked near the Damidot-Blanqui residence. Marc reports an outburst of violence that was as sudden as it was incomprehensible, accompanied by death threats and anti-Semitic insults. An investigation was launched.

[…]
Meanwhile, the driver parked a little further down the road and then approached Marc, saying that the rammed car should not have been in that spot. ‘An argument starts with the man, who seems to be very drunk. He asks me if I witnessed the incident and then starts shouting ‘I know you’re a Zionist, you’re a Jew, a dirty Jew, you massacred people in Gaza’.’ Marc tries to calm him down. ‘Then he became threatening towards me, threatening to kill me. He came very close to me and wanted to punch me, but I fended him off with a kick. He then got angry and I ran off in the direction of the park of the residential complex.’

[…]
At the Medipol, a doctor established the extent of the injuries: triple broken arm, various haematomas on the body, swollen face. Marc was issued with a medical certificate stating that he would be unable to work for 30 days. After his operation on Tuesday morning, the surgeon confirmed that Marc would not be able to drive for at least six weeks.

[…]

Le Progrès / « S*le juif, tu as fait des massacres à Gaza » : Marc, menacé et violemment agressé à Villeurbanne (69) – Fdesouche

Nationalist Leader Joins Romania’s Presidential Race After Georgescu Banned

Călin Georgescu (M) with AUR leader George Simion.Screengrab youtube

George Simion, the leader of the nationalist AUR, Romania’s largest opposition party, which is currently leading the polls, has announced that he will submit his candidacy for the upcoming rerun of last year’s presidential elections. With the deadline for final submissions merely days away, the populist party was forced to make the last-minute decision after electoral authorities and the constitutional court banned its original candidate, Călin Georgescu, from re-entering the race.

The initial strategy of the party was to stick with Georgescu and pressure the government and the courts to change their position. They announced a parliamentary strike on behalf of all nationalist opposition parties to achieve this. However, after consulting with Georgescu and taking into account the approaching deadline, Simion decided that he needed to step up to avoid leaving the right-wing opposition without a viable candidate.

In addition, Anamaria Gavrilă, the leader of the smaller nationalist party POT, which also supports Georgescu, will also submit her candidacy in case Simion is also disqualified. If both of their submissions are validated, then one of them (likely Gavrilă) will drop out in favor of the other.

The threat is real, as there have already been calls from the voices on the establishment’s side to disqualify both Simion and Gavrilă due to their “unconstitutional” politics. However, eliminating all candidates who would represent nearly half of the electorate would instantly delegitimize the election result and could cause such unprecedented social unrest that would be nearly impossible to manage.

Simion especially will have no problem collecting the required 200,000 signatures by Saturday, as polls have consistently put him in first place in the event that Georgescu is not allowed to run. The latest study, published just before Georgescu was banned, gives Simion 28% of the total vote, followed by socialist ex-PM Victor Ponta with 22%, and liberal Bucharest mayor Nicușor Dan with 19%. Simion’s support is likely much higher now, after all that transpired in the past few days.

On Sunday evening, the Central Electoral Bureau (BEC) decided by 10 votes against four—all coming from opposition parties from both Left and Right—that Georgescu cannot participate in the rerun of last year’s election. That election was annulled over claims that Russian interference helped Georgescu win the first round, but no solid proof of this has been presented yet. 

On Monday, the Constitutional Court (CCR)—the same body that decided on the initial annulment—upheld the ban by unanimously rejecting Georgescu’s appeal, despite the tens of thousands of protesters gathering outside the court.

Apart from calling out the Constitutional Court’s blatant violation of democratic principles, Simion also condemned the oppressive “intimidation” tactics employed by prosecutors on behalf of the government against the dozens of protesters who were arrested and charged following Sunday’s clashes with riot police. He called for an investigation into police brutality instead of the abuse of the justice system to suppress dissent. 

Moreover, Simion added that the country’s democratic backsliding in the past few months made it clear that the government, led by a grand coalition between left-wing PSD (S&D) and the centre-right PNL (EPP), can no longer be considered legitimate. “It is time for the Romanian people to wake up and stand up to the abuses of a corrupt and illegitimate government.”

Earlier, Simion also called for international pressure from his Western allies within and outside ECR. On Monday, following Georgescu’s disqualification, the European Parliament’s ECR group, together with the AfD-led ESN, requested a debate on the issue. The mainstream parties immediately rejected the request, arguing that they do not want the “extremists” and “friends of Russia” to create the “false impression that the rule of law in Romania is in danger.”

Nationalist Leader Joins Romania’s Presidential Race After Georgescu Banned ━ The European Conservative

Fitness Influencer Faces Abuse And Death Threats From Trans Activists After Pledging To Open Female-Only Gym In London

The owner of a soon-to-open women’s-only gym in London has faced backlash online after clarifying that the space will not be open to biological men who choose to identify as transgender, and instead prioritize the safety of biological women.

Last month, fitness influencer Natalee Barnet announced that her women’s-only gym, The Girls Spot, had finally secured a location in Wandsworth, London. As described on the facility’s website, the gym “stems from the desire to tackle gym harassment, intimidation and sexual harassment that women face in the gym regularly,” and markets itself as “an environment that allows women to thrive as women.”

Barnet, who has amassed over one million followers on TikTok, had long shared her plans of opening a women’s-only gym with her fans, and regularly offered them updates on her progress. But after proudly declaring her dreams had become a reality, past comments Barnet had made on social media sparked debate.

In 2021, she made a post on X, then Twitter, regarding her policy on trans-identified males using her planned gym. “Respectfully, if you have a problem with trans women attending my gym then you can find another gym to train at,” Barnet posted. “I have discussed this several times before, trans women are women and also a minority that need to be protected. Please keep your transphobia away.” The fitness influencer repeated the sentiment in other social media videos at the time.

However, on Sunday, Barnet clarified in a video posted to X that her position had since changed on the issue. She noted that she had not really fully considered the vision of the gym, which now extends to self-defense classes such as Muay Thai, and hosting “events, workshops and activations around PCOS and training on your menstrual cycle.” The majority of women who would want to come to the gym are those who had experienced harassment or sexual assault, and therefore it was “imperative that [she] stick to the vision and the mission and ensure that these women feel safe.”

As a survivor of sexual assault in a gym herself, Barnet explained the issue of creating a single-sex space was close to her heart. In 2022, she spoke to the Daily Mail about a traumatic incident that she had survived when she was just 18.

“I was sitting in front of the mirrors next to a male gym-goer, who I’d known for a while, and we were talking,” she said. “As I laid back on one of the benches, he touched me really inappropriately. I don’t want to give exact details as it’s too upsetting. It was so rapid that at first, I questioned whether it had happened at all. I couldn’t believe a man would do such a thing to a woman in a public space.”

“I jumped to my feet, without saying a word and kind of stumbled away. I was in shock. He’d never done anything to make me suspect he’d behave like that. I’ve no idea why he thought he could get away with it,” Barnet added. “I didn’t say anything to any of my family. I was upset and processing what had happened. I’ve got brothers and knew if they found out they would be very angry.”

After her announcement, Barnet immediately faced backlash from trans-identified male and pro-trans commentators for her decision, with some arguing that this amounted to a “rug pull.”

Others argued that the concept of the women’s-only gym was unenforceable, and suggested that it was impossible to tell males and females apart from one another in some cases.

“You gonna do genital checks? Gonna do DNA scans? Gonna refuse any woman who happens to look too masculine for your tastes? Think you can ‘always tell’? you had a good concept and turned it into something centered around hateful judgement,” one furious commentator remarked.

Beth McColl, a London-based freelance journalist who has bylines in Vice and Elle magazine, suggested that it was “men” not “trans women” who harassed women inside and outside of gyms.

“Our efforts to tackle harassment, sexual assault and violence should include all victims of that,” McColl said. “A real shame.”

A collage of abuse: trans activists targeted Barnet with sexual and violent threats. Collage posted by @babybeginner.

But the detractors, who have also targeted Barnet with chilling death threats and perverse sexual comments, were challenged by supporters who praised the influencer for her decision to stand by women.

Barnet quickly attracted attention from Sex Matters trustee Emma Hilton, and the founder of women’s-only app Giggle, Sall Grover. Women’s rights advocates similarly piled into Barnet’s replies to defend her from abuse.

Today, Barnet made another post clarifying her position.

“I wholeheartedly sympathise with Trans women and allies who feel hurt by my recent announcement and I appreciate that the decision to operate in this way will come to [sic] as a disappointment to some,” Barnet said. “This has been the unwavering driver behind The Girls Spot and I am excited to launch this space.”

“I want to be clear, I am in no way saying that trans women don’t face adversity or that they don’t deserve a safe space because they absolutely do. We’re all entitled to be treated with kindness and respect,” she added. “The Girls Spot is no different to many other businesses and we operate in accordance with carefully considered financial budgets, balanced by location, operating hours and longevity, meaning it isn’t possible in our early stages to provide all-alternatives [sic].”

“The decision to have The Girls Spot as a single sex gym for those biologically female was not an easy decision and something that I thought over for many years. I spent a great deal of time and money seeking legal advice and it was absolutely not a choice made lightly or out of exclusion or malice, but rather out of my commitment to ensuring a space where women who have experienced trauma, harassment, or discomfort in co-ed gyms can feel at ease,” Barnet continued. “That has always been my mission and drive behind the business. The Girls Spot is on a long journey and I will continue to listen, learn and lend my support for there to be inclusive fitness spaces for all. My hope is that every woman, cis and trans, finds a space as they need to feel secure, strong and empowered.”

Despite some claims from online trans activists that Barnet’s decision would violate the law, the Equality Act does allow for single-sex spaces that specifically block out trans-identified males, even if they have legally changed their sex on documents.

Guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission was updated on the issue in 2022, which says that trans-identified men may be excluded if the reasons are “justifiable and proportionate.” The guidance also specifically mentions two of the points that Barnet discussed in her video and further statement.

One example given by the EHRC in 2022 was where “a leisure centre introduces some female only fitness classes. It decides to exclude trans women because of the degree of physical contact involved in such classes.” The Muay Thai classes that Barnet suggested the gym would end up focusing on would be one of these. 

Furthermore, the EHRC said it would also “most likely to be proportionate to exclude, modify or limit trans people’s access where a service provider has limited resources and physical space to alter the way the service is provided or if they are dealing with groups with particular needs; for example, female victims of male sexual assault who may feel unable to participate in the presence of someone they perceive as male.” Given the specifics of The Girls Spot creating a safe space for women who had been sexually assaulted in a gym before, this would also likely fall within the scope of the protections of the act.

Last year, Reduxx reported how a trans-identified male who was denied membership and access to the women’s showers at a female-only fitness center in Bavaria sued the facility for €2,500 in compensation, claiming “personal injury suffered.” The suit came just mere weeks after the gym was already ordered to pay him €1,000 by the federal anti-discrimination commissioner.

https://reduxx.info/fitness-influencer-faces-abuse-and-death-threats-from-trans-activists-after-pledging-to-open-female-only-gym-in-london/