Chechen Teen Allegedly Stabbed by Brother for ‘Living European’, Raped by Father
Gepostet von Breitbart London am Samstag, 2. Oktober 2021
Meghan Markle’s USA Popularity DISASTER Revealed
Gay Parking Spaces 🤣 You Won’t Believe This 🤣
Pfizer Lobbyists Claim Responsibility For Installing Politicians Into Positions of Power
A serious question: when someone helps install a politician into a position of power, and then becomes a lobbyist, are any “favours” then expected of said politician?
This specifically addresses 2 of them. One is Erin O’Toole, Leader of the Conservative Party of Canada, and Leader of the Official Opposition. The other is Doug Ford, Leader of the Ontario Progressive Conservative Party, and Premier of Ontario.
Both men are in their respective positions as a result of others who then went on to become lobbyists for Pfizer. Both support the mass vaccination agenda, and support lockdowns and martial law of society.
Last month, 4 lobbyists from Pfizer tried to push for vaccine sales on behalf of their client. This is according to records from the Ontario Lobbying Registry. Let’s take a look into who these people actually are.
Why Are Americans Being Coerced To Submit To Injection With A Dangerous Substance That Is Known Not To Protect Against Covid but to cause death and serious health injuries?
Why Are Americans Being Coerced To Submit To Injection With A Dangerous Substance That Is Known Not To Protect Against Covid but to cause death and serious health injuries?
Paul Craig Roberts
The Israelis Have Now Admitted the Impotence of the “vaccine” on TV news:
If the “Covid Pandemic” is real, why have Denmark, Norway, and Sweden abolished all Covid restrictions and declared an end to the crisis?
What explains the Vaccine Mandates? It is known that the vaccine does not protect—thus masks and booster shots—but it does kill and maim. Why are they determined to kill and maim us?
Three Thousand Doctors and Scientists want to know why they are being prevented from treating their patients with safe and effective medicines.
Over 3,000 Doctors and Scientists Sign Declaration Accusing COVID Policy-Makers of ‘Crimes Against Humanity’
The answer seems to be profit for Big Pharma and authoritarian control for government.
On ABC with George Stehanapoulos Pfizer CEO Albert Boula said henceforth normal life consists of annual booster shots. https://www.infowars.com/posts/pfizer-ceo-says-normal-life-wont-return-without-regular-covid-vaccinations/
Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel agrees. He says there will be Covid booster shots forever.
The gravy train is forever.
And so are the injuries and deaths from the vaccine.
45% of the FDA’s Annual Budget Comes from Big Pharma
The regulators are financially dependent on those they are supposed to regulate. Economist George Stigler pointed out decades ago that regulatory agencies are always captured by the industry they regulate. Regulators become facilitators and agents for the regulated.
Some New Yorkers Belatedly Wake Up and Protest Vaccination Mandate by Democrat Governor Who Has No Authority to Issue Mandates
Health Care Workers Who Have Witnessed Deaths and Disabilities from Vaccine Refuse The Death Shot
That should tell you something. Why do people take the Death Shot when health care workers have to be coerced into taking it?
Macron Calls For Economic Sanctions On Britain
Pro-Europeans Caught Lying Over Shortages
Community Masking: Where did ‘The Science’ Come From?
Before 2020, evidence for the efficacy of community masking – that is, asking ordinary members of the public to wear cloth or surgical masks when going about their business – was shaky at best.
This evidence was reviewed in detail by Jeffrey Anderson, a former director of the Bureau of Justice Statistics. He notes that:
of the 14 RCTs that have tested the effectiveness of masks in preventing the transmission of respiratory viruses, three suggest, but do not provide any statistically significant evidence in intention-to-treat analysis, that masks might be useful. The other eleven suggest that masks are either useless—whether compared with no masks or because they appear not to add to good hand hygiene alone—or actually counterproductive.
In another piece that’s well worth reading, Professor Steve Templeton provides a list of quotations from what he calls “the BP era” (Before Things Got Political). Each quotation, taken from one or other expert, testifies to the lack of evidence that community masking works against respiratory pathogens.
For example, in a systematic review published early last year, Jingyi Xiao and colleagues “did not find evidence that surgical-type face masks are effective in reducing laboratory-confirmed influenza transmission, either when worn by infected persons… or by persons in the general community to reduce their susceptibility”.
This is presumably why, at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, health authorities in both the U.K. and the U.S. advised against community masking.
For example, on 4th March 2020, Chris Whitty told Sky News that “wearing a mask if you don’t have an infection reduces the risk almost not at all”. And as late as 3rd April, Jonathan Van Tam said “there is no evidence that general wearing of face masks… affects the spread of the disease”.
Likewise, in a tweet sent on 27th February, the CDC said that it “does not currently recommend the use of facemasks”. And two days later, the U.S. Surgeon General urged people to “STOP BUYING MASKS” because they are “NOT effective” at preventing the general public from catching coronavirus.
In a video interview from May of 2019, Anthony Fauci actually laughed at the notion of wearing a face mask. The interviewer asks him, “The best way for me to prevent getting an infectious disease… is what? Wearing a mask?” To which Fauci replies, “No, no no… you avoid all the paranoid aspects.”
Yet by the summer of 2020, the health authorities in both countries had done an about-face, and were now recommending face masks to the public. These recommendations subsequently became mandates.
‘The Science,’ in other words, had changed. But what prompted this change? The charitable answer is that new evidence emerged suggesting that community masking does work against SARS-CoV-2. However, this new evidence looks just as shaky – if not shakier – than the pre-Covid evidence.
I suspect that something else happened. Back in the spring of 2020, all Western countries were on the same upward trajectory, with cases doubling every few days. Meanwhile, Japan, Korea, Hong Kong and Singapore had all manged to ‘flatten the curve’, despite eschewing draconian lockdowns.
Commentators were searching around for an explanation, and ‘masks’ seemed like a good one. After all, Western health authorities had advised against masks. Yet many East Asians had been wearing them for years.
If you were on social media at that time, you probably remember seeing a version of this chart, which went viral numerous times:
Putting ‘correlation doesn’t equal causation’ aside, it appears to suggest that masks are the crucial factor for bringing COVID under control. Of course, the subsequent imposition of mask mandates in Western countries didn’t forestall large winter outbreaks, which rather undermines the mask theory.
Nonetheless, it seemed plausible enough at the time. And articles began appearing in major newsoutlets that questioned the West’s reluctance to wear face masks. On social media, commentators asked why we shouldn’t follow the East Asian countries, given their far greater success in handling the pandemic.
I suspect this pressure had more to do with the health authorities’ about-face than any fundamental change in the quality of evidence. It was another case of ‘politician’s logic’. ‘Something must be done; mask-wearing is something; therefore we must do it.’
In a matter of weeks, ‘The science’ went from ‘don’t do X’ to ‘do X’. And yet it took another whole year for the first RCT of community masking to be published. The theory I’ve outlined is speculative, of course. But I don’t see what else can account for such a sudden shift in public health advice.
https://dailysceptic.org/2021/09/28/community-masking-where-did-the-science-come-from/
Covid vaccines: Romanian judiciary investigates Ursula van der Leyen
The will of the European Union and some national governments to impose mass vaccination, including mRNA injections, on all Europeans is collapsing in the face of opposition from Central Eastern European countries, which are once again on the front line fighting for fundamental freedoms and respect for their sovereign identity.
The Romanian prosecutor’s office has launched an investigation into the procurement of the Covid vaccine and has also closed the country’s vaccination centres because people rejected the experimental vaccines.
As previously reported, the European Union has opened an investigation into secret talks between the President of the European Commission and the CEO of Pfizer about the sale of vaccines. The European Ombudsman has asked Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to explain how she lost the text messages she exchanged with Pfizer’s CEO during talks on the purchase of vaccines.
Now Romania’s National Anti-Corruption Agency (DNA) has also announced that it has opened an investigation into the circumstances under which Romania bought Covid vaccines. There were far too many of them, Romanian prosecutors seem to say.
“As far as I know, the procedures for buying [vaccines] were the same in all EU countries and were handled by the European Commission,” said Valeriu Gheorghiță, head of the national vaccination campaign, according to Hotnews.ro.
Prosecutors said investigations had been launched to uncover possible “abuse of power” [related to personal benefits derived from those yet to be named].
France: Islamist plotted attack on synagogue with Kalashnikov
The discovery of the police officers is a cause for concern. According to information obtained by Radio RTL on Friday the 1st of October, the man arrested in September 2021 carrying a Kalashnikov and a large quantity of jihadist literature was plotting an attack on a synagogue. Investigators from the Anti-Terrorism Department (SAT) of the Paris Criminal Investigation Department and the Directorate General of External Security (DGSI) discovered on the phone of the 27-year-old suspect information about places of worship of the Jewish community in Paris.Other information gathered by this dangerous person: the modalities of leaving for Syria to fight the jihad.
There is a reasonable suspicion that this S-registered person (register of persons suspected of terrorism, editor’s note) was preparing an attack and, given the scale of the threat, he was arrested in Noisy-le-Sec (Seine-Saint-Denis). The arrest was made public and the man was charged on September 5 with engaging in a criminal terrorist organisation, in particular for the jihadist texts found in his flat. In police custody, the man did not tell the police officers much. He stated that he had ordered the weapon on the Darknet for sport shooters.The investigators do not believe this to be true. Since then, he has not been questioned by an investigating judge.