On December 27 at around 10 pm, a man entered a Muslim prayer room near the Collège in Domène, where he threw the contents of several cupboards and shelves on the floor, tore out a radiator and wrote words on a paper tablecloth accusing the imam of indoctrinating the faithful and making them become terrorists. When he was stopped by a worshipper and a person in charge of the place, he fled and shouted incoherent words.
The accused was arraigned on December 31 in immediate presentment before the Grenoble Criminal Court and had asked for time to prepare his defence as a new psychiatric report had been ordered. Pending the new hearing, he was detained in Grenoble-Varces prison.
On Wednesday, February 9, he appeared in criminal court again as a prisoner to stand trial for “damaging or destroying two buildings used for religion” as a recidivist. He was also charged with stealing – also as a recidivist – the car in which he slept and drove around.
“He is someone who is looking for himself a bit. He was Catholic before he met a Muslim woman and converted to Islam. He is questioning his religion, but there is no Islamophobic connotation in his actions,” stressed his lawyer Fanny Marion.(…) La Dépêche
The Yellow Wigs mocking the French presidential couple. Screenshot from YouTube
The First Lady of France could end the suspense of the disappearance of Jean-Michel Trogneux in the blink of an eye, by appearing in the simplest of clothes: A birth suit. Especially since the French are not overly sensitive about nudity.
Obviously, in the case at hand, it would be a less appealing prospect, but the only effective one to put an end to the gossip.
In order to pay tribute to the unexplained disappearance of Jean-Michel Trogneux, the “brother” of Brigittte Macron, a promotional operation has been launched: That of the Perruques Jaunes, the Yellow Wigs.
Rumours persist that the French Head of the State who wants to “piss off” his fellow countrymen, had been the object of statutory rape by his drama teacher at the age of 14. On Saturday, February 12, 2022 and during the whole campaign, freedom demonstrations will be marked by Yellow Wigs.
“To get a wig, it’s very simple, there are some in every costume shop or by mail order. The model shown on these pictures is available for example in a Parisian shop, 22 bis rue Montmartre or on the website, for the modest sum of 8,9 €. But don’t worry: the investment will easily be repaid on the motorway service areas with our trucker friends on their way to Brussels,” the organizers said.
“At €10 per toll swipe, the wig will pay for itself in no time. That’s what we call convergence of struggles! Buy two or three or twelve for your friends, because wigs are like parties, the more the merrier! The current demonstrations with their outdated slogans (“We’re tired, we’re tired”; “Freedom! Resistance!”) will become happy occasions where we have fun at the expense of the tyrants.”
Mocking Macron
Mocking rulers is an old French tradition, known as the mazarinades according to Wikipedia: “From the mockery of his Italian accent and his effeminate habits to the crudest attacks on his alleged love affairs with the queen and the conduct of his nieces, all sorts of insults are combined in the mazarinades against Cardinal Mazarin, who, according to all historical accounts, seemed insensitive to these attacks.”
A Telegram thread called “No Brain inside” dedicated to the curious past of Brigitte, launched the Yellow Wigs operation for all the demonstrations.
Since the publication in October 2021 of the investigation by Faits & Documents on the “Brigitte Macron Mystery”, a shoddy defence was orchestrated by the couple clearly struggling to put out the fire. Unable to file a complaint against Faits & Documents (which indirectly validates the whole investigation), the Macron’s handlers have been trying to light counter-fires without success.
On Sunday November 5, 2021, on the set of Vivement Dimanche on France 2, comedian Arnaud Tsamère delivered a sketch in which he pretended to have Emmanuel Macron on the phone. In this fictitious conversation with President Macron, the comedian says: “I take it the press knows? And he adds: “I suppose that Brigitte is shaken?”.
The decidedly unfunny sentence provoked laughter, then discomfort in the audience. Indeed, we understand that the reply was a rather nasty play on words: “I suppose that Brigitte was jerked off”.
Professional genealogists are currently investigating the Trogneux and Auzière families, the relatives of Brigitte.
“Those who pull the strings of the puppets used the Brigitte deception to force Macron to impose his pro-vaxx policy with the suppression of essential freedoms. They had a way of blackmailing him,” said researcher Alain Penoel.
A huge file is currently being compiled in web page format (.html) by a genealogist, Alain Beyrand. Photos, dates, extracts from surveys are presented.
Beyrand explained that “as a genealogy enthusiast, I am used to carrying out such investigations to find the parents of an ancestor, to weigh each hypothesis… The search for administrative or biographical archive documents [by journalist Xavier Poussard who launched the investigation] is well conducted”.
The author noted the absence in large numbers of key documents, which very quickly appeared suspicious. And the same goes for the inconsistencies that seem intended to confuse the issue.
The leftwing newspaper Liberation has stepped in to save the respectability of the presidential couple, presenting a “checknews”, which was taken up, for lack of anything better, in a few other newspapers but it contained no facts only ad hominem attacks.
Despite the enormity of the attack against Brigitte, the contrast between the seriousness of the case and the factual vacuity of their response, has further fuelled concern.
The suspicion is that Emmanuel Macron, born in 1977, married Jean-Michel Trogneux born in 1945, in 2007. Then Jean-Michel became his fictitious wife Brigitte, fictitiously born in 1953. The transformation allegedly took place at the end of the 1980s. Before, Brigitte did not exist or was “manufactured” a posteriori, after Jean-Michel disappeared.
The father of three children, become their mother, according to the hypothesis.
According to Penoel, this is “an Orwellian level of organized truth tampering at the top of the state”.
Penoel added: “The deception is much more serious than that of [President Francois] Mitterrand who hid his illegitimate daughter. There we have before us the glitter and the smoke of a curious presidential couple of a so-called start-up nation. The media sold us an angel who ensured with supreme grace the status of First Lady. And today we are discovering the other side of these storytelling images. The angel hides a sex that is not that of the front pages of the celebrity magazines that feature her. Mitterrand hid Mazarine, while Macron brandished Brigitte, it’s not the same level of deception at all. It is not a matter of having a ‘private life’, it is a large-scale embezzlement against the French and even world population.”
In his editorial of Thursday February 10, Paul Sugy, journalist for Le Figaro, looks at the opening of the conference on the future of Europe, where a poster showing a veiled woman is causing controversy.
The poster for the conference on the future of Europe, which takes place from February 11 to 13 and is jointly organised by the three EU institutions, is part of a series of 17 images created by the EU to illustrate and promote the event. I admit that I already feel a first uneasiness in the face of this kind of campaigning: 17 posters in total, which means that old people, young people, men, women… can be seen at the same time.
Every day, political representation submits more and more to the imperative of making things equal. Following this logic, will it one day take 450 million posters for everyone to be sure that they can perfectly identify with this advertising campaign?
Surprisingly, she is the only person who is attached to a visible religious sign. Nowhere is there a kippah or a baptismal medal.
What is the message? If one had to highlight one of several religions, why Islam, which is a very small minority in the EU?
Europe is a civilisation rooted in Christian faith rather than a supranational political organisation. Or if the message is that the headscarf is a “fashion” accessory like any other, let us be clear: The authors of the campaign make themselves accomplices of an Islamist propaganda discourse, against which one would wish for more resistance on the part of the EU.
After all, the “future” in many Islamic countries is gradually coming thanks to the struggle of thousands of courageous women who risk their safety by freeing themselves from this veil. It is precisely this veil that the EU highlights when it wants to think about the future. What a signal.
Under the pretext of fighting discrimination against Muslims, associations exploit the lack of transparency and compliance of the EU institutions to collect subsidies or influence EU policy.
Prefix-obsessed activists have commandeered education, advancing radical ideologies as fact on young minds. The National Education Association promotes anti-racist teaching to disrupt white supremacy. The designated prefix provides perfect PR: why wouldn’t one be anti-racist? Just like anti-racism ideologues, current anti-fascists love to hide behind their label. “There is an ANTI- prefix, therefore we are against Fascism just like our grandfathers in World War II who fought against Fascism!” is a common cry attempting to debase those who dare question the intentions of anti-fascists. North Carolina State Board of Education member James Ford, a radical anti-racist, once tweetedthat being anti-anti-fascism is calling oneself a fascist, according to the “rules of grammar” (the very rules of grammar that are based in white supremacy). If one is against anti-fascism, one is fascist. The anti’s cancel out: simple math (another racist subject).
Unfortunately, the prefix strategy of “anti-fascism” becomes problematic once one studies history. Italian Cesare Lombroso, a 19th-century scientist and criminologist, influenced progressive Europeans. According to the book The Idea of Decline in Western History by Arthur Herman:
[Lombroso] inspired a fascination with the link between heredity and criminal behavior that would consume social scientists for at least half a century. …according to the Lombrosian approach, all these forms of social deviance were diseases, like epilepsy. The criminal or social deviant required treatment, not punishment. The instinct to punish the offender for his actions was itself a primitive instinct, Lombroso argued, which had no place in an enlightened civilized community.
Lombroso and his theories of criminal as predetermined biology broke from the classical theories of criminal behavior as free will. Therefore, the focus shifted from equal punishment of the crime to a focus on rehabilitation or prevention, as the criminals could not help themselves. This resulting progressive shift aligns with “restorative justice” in schools. Kids who break rules do not need standard pre-determined punishment; they need individualized treatment through social-emotional learning and healing circles. Modern-day anti-fascists espouse this take on restorative justice in schools as well as communities: social emotional learning, not school resource officers; social workers, not police.
Additionally, according to Dr. Hermann’s research:
The 1930 Fascist Legal code, with its Lombrosian stress on the ‘treatment’ and rehabilitation of the offenders was among the most admired and progressive of all of Mussolini’s reforms. In the final analysis, the criminal’s or the pervert’s behavior was not his fault.
Today’s anti-fascist or anti-racist stance on a criminal’s behavior might be modified from “not his fault” because of pre-determined biology to “not his fault” because of systemic inequities or institutionalized white supremacy. But the resulting removal of free will from the behavioral equation results in a similar conclusion that the Lombroso Positivists developed: incorporated into FascistLegal Code was focus on the criminal and rehabilitation, not the crime and punishment. Ironic — anti-fascists in education and their emphasis on restorative justice overlaps with 1930s Fascist Legal code. Would that make anti-fascists ultimately fascist in this historical context? Does having similar reforms as Mussolini cancel out the “anti” in “anti-fascist”?
Placing a superficial prefix in front of an ideology to elevate oneself to a position of virtuous defender of human rights does nothing but signal ignorance, especially when the same concepts of modern-day anti-fascists overlap with 1930s Fascist Legal Code. These terms and philosophies often overlap and can be twisted and perverted regardless of what prefix modern education ideologues attach to themselves. History is much more nuanced and complex than a simple prefix can relate. Consequently, students and teachers should not engage education from an “anti-racist” or an “anti-fascist” lens. This prefix posturing compels a narrow-minded view on history and current events that is anti-intellectual and anti-informed.
Hundreds of cars, trucks and mobile homes drove towards Bern this week to block the federal capital. The police prevented this protest against the Corona measures by blocking the city.
The Bern cantonal police spoke of “a total of over 200 vehicles”. No one knows how many cars, trucks and mobile homes really arrived from all over Switzerland on Monday. Bern was the destination of the various convoys.
From 4:00 pm, the numerous vehicles was supposed to arrive in Bern and block the city and especially the Bundesplatz. The various convoys from all over Switzerland coordinated their arrival using the “Zello” walkie-talkie app.
From Thun, Zug, Basel, Geneva, Zurich or western Switzerland, they rolled in at 80 km/h on the autobahns – deliberately at a leisurely pace in order to obstruct traffic.
The police were able to “prevent the blockade of Bern as much as possible” with a large contingent, as the Berner Zeitung reported: “In addition to the Bundesplatz, the emergency services also blocked bridges and access roads to the city.”
Occasionally, vehicle occupants were checked and were handed exit directions. What the police for their part recorded as a success in preventing a blockade of the city was indirectly a success for the Swiss “freedom convoys”, because the numerous barriers ultimately caused the security forces themselves to cause a huge blockade.
The result was traffic delays and traffic jams throughout the city, especially around the city center, including on public transport. According to the Berner Zeitung, Bernmobil had to divert bus routes 10 and 19 via Bärenplatz.
The demands of the peaceful convoy participants were the immediate abolition of Corona measures, cancellation of the health pass and the “illegal, unjustified state of emergency”.
Canadian truckers , who have been blockading Canada’s capital Ottawa for more than a week and have served as the models for the “freedom convoys” . The mayor of Ottawa declared a state of emergency on Sunday.
According to Germany daily Die Welt, thousands of protesters had descended on Ottawa again over the weekend, adding to the thousands who had stayed since last weekend, totally paralyzing downtown.
In the meantime, the Canadian freedom convoys and demonstrations have also spread to other Canadian cities, as Canadian media reported, including Toronto, Calgary, Quebec City and Vancouver.
