Germany: 10,000 protest in Rostock against the Corona measures – city wanted to record all participants by name
Around 10,000 people, more than twice as many as last time, walked their own protest route across the city! In Rostock, for the first time, the registered Monday demonstration against the Corona restrictions and against compulsory vaccination could not take place as planned.
The police report says: “Before the start of the assembly, the assembly leader was supposed to keep an attendance list in connection with the Infection Protection Act, in which the data of the participants is recorded. The leader of the meeting was not in a position to do this.
After the previous Monday demonstrations in Rostock, which have so far always been trouble-free – mostly in compliance with the hygiene rules (distance, mask) – now suddenly all demonstrators were to have their names recorded in lists.
A case of harassment? Or legally justifiable?
The renowned, nationally known lawyer Joachim Steinhöfel (59) says in response to a BILD newspaper enquiry about the demo requirement: “What a fatal signal! Political persecution also began in the GDR with the systematic registration of ‘deviants’. The procedure is also clearly unconstitutional and violates several basic rights, in particular the right to freedom of demonstration!”On Monday evening, the people could not be dissuaded from their planned protest and first marched in front of the town hall. They demanded that Mayor Claus Ruhe Madsen (49, non-party) show himself – to no avail. Afterwards, the protest marched peacefully through the city centre to the city harbour.
Police spokeswoman Dörte Lembke: “At the peak, about 10,000 people joined the march, the vast majority from the middle-class spectrum.”
Who was responsible for the strict, almost impossible to fulfil requirements and the resulting spontaneous demonstration – this is now being disputed. City spokesman Ulrich Kunze told BILD on Tuesday: “The fact that the contact details were to be collected was only a recommendation, not an obligation. The head of the office assured me of that again after consultation.”
Assembly leader Jens Kaufmann (55, entrepreneur) contradicts this account: “This ‘should’ is more about ‘must’ than ‘can’. I should record the names, addresses, telephone numbers of all participants.” According to Kaufmann, he would have made himself liable to prosecution if he had ignored this requirement, which should be seen as a political decision.
In addition, Kaufmann said, he had asked the police commander to clarify or have the legal interpretation of this required list of participants clarified with the regulatory authority or Lord Mayor Madsen on site. This had not happened even after an hour. Therefore, he could not be responsible for the demo on this scale.
By the way: When the soccer club FC Hansa advanced into the 2nd league in May, 10,000 people were allowed to celebrate spontaneously – also under Corona conditions – in a humid and uncontrolled way, without distances and masks, on the market square – and the Lord Mayor was present in person. In retrospect, this did not prove to be a Corona infection hotspot.
Im off ☀️ Florida Guarantee Freedom ❤️ DeSantis Is A Genius 👏👏👏👏
Freudian Slip? WHO Director Says Covid Boosters Are Being Used to “Kill Children” in Slip-Up During Press Conference (VIDEO)
Whittys Armed Threat To Boris
Harry Miller on His Landmark Appeal Court Victory over Police Recording Trans Tweet as Hate Incident
The European country overwhelmed by the tsunami of immigration – What does the Belgian case tell us?
by Giulio Meotti
“Historical peoples in a number of cities, districts and departments feel they are in the minority. The demographic change in Europe is extremely spectacular”. So the French philosopher Alain Finkielkraut has just said. Maybe he was thinking of his neighbors.
Although women of foreign nationality are only one sixth of all women of childbearing age in Belgium, half of all children in Belgium are now born to foreign women. This is the picture that emerged from the Institute of Statistics. One third of Belgium’s population is of foreign origin and Belgians are already in the minority in Brussels. But the “Great Replacement” is just a far-right fantasy as everyone knows … A fantasy shared by Statbel.
As of January 1, 2020, the population of Belgium was made up of 67.9 percent Belgians of Belgian origin. Ten years ago, in 2010, the share of Belgians of Belgian origin was 74.3 per cent. The Belgian ethnic population is dwindling rapidly. In the Brussels Region, the share of people of foreign nationality is now at 35.3 per cent.
“In Brussels, indigenous Belgians represent a third of the population,” explains Rtbf. “They range from European civil servants to Afghan asylum seekers, passing through the Turkish grocer, the Moroccan social worker or the Congolese doctor. In Belgium, population growth is exclusively due to immigration ”.
What does the Belgian case tell us? That we need to think carefully before following the sirens of those asking for millions of economic migrants to enter Europe.
Arend Lijphart, a Dutch political scientist working at the University of California, has influenced generations of Western colleagues (in Italy the scholar’s work was published by the Mill) by praising Belgium for its “mild consensual democracy”. The consequences have been the explosion in the number of parties, hyper-proportionalism in Parliament, the domination of Parliament over the government and state multiculturalism. A “cold Bosnia” in the heart of Europe.
A first wave of immigration was organized under the pressure of heavy industry. First with European countries (Italy, Spain, Greece). Then, from 1964, with the countries of Muslim culture (Morocco, Turkey, Algeria) to facilitate the reception of foreign workers. Regardless of any cultural considerations, family immigration was encouraged to cope with the aging population (remember anything?).
More than one million entered Belgium legally between 2000 and 20101. In the 2009-2011 period alone, family reunification, which represents half of the residence permits, allowed 121,000 foreigners to settle in Belgium.
Since 2007, the annual number of foreign arrivals to Belgium has invariably exceeded 100,000. In 25 years, the immigrant population (of foreign or Belgian nationality) has doubled. On 1 January 2018, of the 11.3 million inhabitants of Belgium, 16.7 percent were born abroad (1.9 million people). These data do not take into account illegal immigrants or asylum seekers.
The city of Antwerp, the second largest in the country, now has more immigrants than natives. And as a deputy revealed, “78 per cent of children aged 1 to 6 are foreigners”. The 2020 data show that Brussels will formally be the capital of the European Union, but by now it has very little European. Mohamed, Mohammed and Ahmed are the three most popular names in the whole Brussels region. “The city has a high percentage of Muslims and in some neighborhoods they are even the majority,” explains Le Figaro. “41 percent of public school students take the Muslim religion course”.
“Belgium will become Arab”. This prediction does not come from a dangerous right-wing conspirator, but from a journalist, Fawzia Zouari, on the pages of the daily Jeune Afrique to summarize “the Islamization of minds”. And so the country par excellence of national fusion is disappearing, the melting pot of identities that had to annihilate them all, the homeland of any European man who has become terra nullius.
German politician warns of imminent release of Islamists from prison – President of the Office for the Protection of the Constitution warned of ongoing radicalisation of detainees
In the coming year, numerous IS returnees are to be released from prison. The Christian Democratic Union (CDU) demands immediate measures in an interview with the newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ). “The federal and state security and justice authorities must act now to prevent harm to the population,” said Alexander Throm, the interior policy spokesman of the CDU/CSU parliamentary group in the German Parliament.
Throm also referred to the attacks in Vienna and Dresden last year. This shows how real the threat posed by Islamists released from prison is.
At the weekend, the President of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, Thomas Haldenwang, had also warned of the danger posed by Islamist terror. Haldenwang complained that IS returnees in custody often hold on to their convictions. “We have to realise that radicalisation often does not abate,” Haldenwang told the newspapers of the Funke Media Group
His authority is asked to examine each individual case. “We need to know what is happening in the prisons, which people are still radicalised. For this, there must be an intensive exchange between the judiciary and the security authorities – we are already on the right path.Several former supporters of the terrorist militia Islamic State had to stand trial on suspicion of terrorism and other charges after arriving in Germany, and quite a number of them were convicted. According to the newspaper FAZ, however, the Office for the Protection of the Constitution could not say how many extremists were in custody and how many were soon to be released from prison.Union politician Throm criticises the incomplete data situation. This must change urgently. In addition, the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) interior politician told the FAZ that he is calling for retrospective preventive detention for prisoners who have become radicalised while in custody.
Dutch cabinet members entered legally binding agreements with WEF
The Dutch cabinet has signed “legally binding agreements” with Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum. The cabinet admitted this in response to parliamentary questions submitted by Gideon van Meijeren of the Forum for Democracy party.
Great Reset propagandist Schwab’s World Economic Forum, a supreme globalist organization, believes that the Coronavirus has to be used to carry out a worldwide transformation to socialism, where totalitarian state control must be introduced everywhere. Because that is “safe” and “efficient” according to Schwab, who looks and acts like a villain from a James Bond film.
Schwab had earlier complained about people spreading this notion as a “conspiracy theory” but the WEF’s website openly discusses these topics to transform society. The contents of his plans are downright shocking. Humans have to merge with the latest technology, break all meaningful bonds and give up all bodily autonomy and freedom only to be surveilled full-time.
The Great Reset, a globalist utopia, is therefore essentially a more extreme version of communism made possible by technology.
Mainstream Dutch politicians however, have a warm relationship with this revolting organization and its creepy boss. The Forum for Democracy wanted to know what mutual agreements have been signed on matters of which the voter knows nothing.
In their response, the cabinet has admitted to FVD MP Gideon van Meijeren, who submitted the questions, that there has indeed been close cooperation between the cabinet and WEF. And yes, agreements were also signed with the Stalinist organization… and those agreements are legally binding.
“Dutch ministers regularly participate in meetings organized by the WEF,” said the cabinet in the answer to Van Meijeren’s parliamentary questions. “In addition, there are partnerships with the WEF that have been established in the following areas: Sustainable Investment Policy, Tropic Forest Alliance, Food System Initiative, Food Innovation Hubs.”
It added: “The obligations set out in these agreements are legally binding.”
How did the WEF become a supranational body that really determines what happens in the Netherlands and other countries? Until recently, very few voters have understood the role that the WEF has played in usurping their democratic right to choose their representatives.
FvD leader Thierry Baudet commented on the alarming response: “Seven months ago: Chamber blocked a debate on The Great Reset. Because they said it was a ‘conspiracy theory’. After persistent questions, the FVD finally received incontrovertible evidence this week that Klaus Schwab’s agenda is leading [Dutch Premier] Rutte et al. They have been totally exposed.”
The Corona crisis is no longer a health crisis, but an economic one and it should be clear to anyone that this crisis did not strike by chance like a force of nature. The lockdowns have worked like a charm since they starved small and medium-sized businesses and thus greatly helped to boost the wealth of the super rich.
They have played all too well into the hands of Schwab and his wealthy supporters. Because according to this year’s Forbes list of the richest people, 660 new billionaires were minted – an increase of a staggering 30 percent compared to the previous year.
The Amazon founder Jeff Bezos was able to gain almost 100 billion dollars and popular figure Bill Gates also gained 31 billion dollars. Facebook boss Mark Zuckerberg, whose platform is now called Meta, received an additional 71 billion and other tech giants such as Larry Page and Sergey Brin (both Google) were able to grow into the double-digit billion range. The absolute winner with an unimaginable increase of 138 billion is however Tesla boss Elon Musk.
So essentially, this “pandemic” is a money grab: The redistribution of wealth to the very rich is also in full swing thanks to the experimental gene therapy injections. At the top of the winners is co-founder and BioNTech CEO Ugur Sahin, who is now worth a whopping $13.3 billion. Close behind is Stéphane Bancel, CEO of Moderna with $12.5 billion. Numerous other pharmaceutical company executives have also benefited, as have corporate investors such as Bill Gates and suppliers such as ROVI, which produce vaccine vials.
A little curiously, supply chains were interrupted by a container ship that got stuck in the Suez Canal after a strange maneuver (the course was described as the shape of a giant penis). Shipping container prices have multiplied since then – from around $2 000 to over $9 000. The prices of raw materials rose to unimaginable high levels while gas and energy prices shot up as well. This in turn had an impact on fertilizer production and thus on food prices which will be felt only next year.
The already galloping inflation is likely to pick up even further which will benefit only those with assets.