Allah's Willing Executioners

From the moment she entered office, Germany’s Federal Interior Minister Nancy Faeser (SPD) said she was going to make “right-wing extremism” her biggest priority. Now, she says she is taking action with a ten-point plan, which features a raft of measures ranging from gun confiscation to firing civil service workers.

“We take action against right-wing extremism, and that is a high priority for me. Our democracy is vigilant and defensive,” Faeser stated when presenting the catalog of measures on Tuesday.

Despite Faeser’s repeated use of the phrase “right-wing extremism,” it remains unclear exactly how this term will be defined. There are worries that such a label and the fact that there are violent right-wing extremists, just as their violent left-wing extremists, will be used as a pretext to pursue conservatives and dissidents.

For example, there is no clear indication whether such a term will cover only the tiny minority of extremists calling for the killing of foreigners or if it will more broadly apply to anyone who is opposed to mass immigration. For many on the German left motivated by the phrase “No border, no nation,” any opposition to legal or illegal immigration is inherently right-wing extremism.

Just last week, a court in Cologne ruled that the entire Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, one of the largest opposition parties in Germany and a party which has received millions of votes, could now be labeled as a “suspected threat to democracy.” This designation allows all members to be surveilled by the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV) regardless of whether they committed a crime or not, as well as authorizing the use of informants to monitor the party.

It also means that anyone affiliated with the party could easily fall under the designation of a “right-wing extremist.”

Despite these ambiguities, Germany’s interior minister says her ministry’s new measures will dismantle networks being used to push right-wing extremism and push for disarming anyone identified as a right-wing extremist. That means, for example, that gun confiscation is in the cards.

For this purpose, the BfV will “significantly expand the investigation and analysis of right-wing extremist financial activities.”

“The aim is in particular to identify and combat crucial networks, actors, and business areas,” Faesar added, insisting that action can only be taken to address and reduce “hate speech on the internet,” with the extension of powers and the necessary structures available to investigators.

The Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA) will also establish a task force and monitor social media “to identify current developments at an early stage.” The Telegram messaging app, which places a high emphasis on freedom of speech, has become a special focus of the German government, with Faeser issuing frequent threats to outright ban the entire platform. BKA boss Holger Münch said that the government will monitor this app regardless of cooperation from Telegram or not.

As Remix News has previously reported, Germany is preparing an enormous amount of resources to repress the country’s opposition, including censorship, surveillance, and criminalization of speech.

As for Faeser herself, she was outed just last month as having written for “Antifa magazine” shortly before she assumed the role of interior minister, with the magazine funded by an organization officially designated an extremist left-wing organization and a threat to democracy by the BfV.

“Right-wing extremists” will be removed from public service

One of the key measures in Faeser’s ten-point plan is to “remove enemies of the constitution from public service more quickly and easily.”

However, this is only possible if the Federal Disciplinary Act is changed, a move which the head of the Office for the Protection of the Constitution Thomas Haldenwang considers to be crucial.

“It is necessary to face this. Right-wing extremists have no place in public service,” he noted.

The question now becomes whether those who support the AfD will now implicitly or even explicitly be labeled “right-wing extremists” by the German government, which could set the stage for a mass purge of anyone associated with the party.

The Cologne court ruling comes despite the AfD’s party’s leaders and its core politicians again and again voicing their support for parliamentary democracy, and even calling for more democracy in Germany, including a citizen referendum system at the federal level, such as the one seen in Switzerland. Nevertheless, the party’s vocal support against mass immigration and opposition to Covid-19 measures has made it the top target of the country’s liberal establishment.

Other measures from Faeser include improved protection for victims of right-wing extremist violence, but questions of bias will inevitably arise over the fact that AfD is the party most targeted for political violence, as per government statistics, including violent assaults and arson.

Faeser previously pointed out the dangers of right-wing extremism and advocated extensive countermeasures. In February, she spoke out in favor of starting the “fight against the right” already in kindergarten.

https://rmx.news/article/conservatives-beware-germanys-left-wing-interior-minister-has-10-point-plan-to-fight-right-wing-extremism/

By Paul S. Gardiner

Evidence has come to light strongly indicating that the Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines are not really “vaccines” in the medical and legal sense of the word, but rather “experimental gene therapies.”  If proven true, the significance and legal ramifications of this allegation are profound.

This article summarizes a presentation by Dr. David Martin, a national intelligence analyst and founder of IQ100 Index, a developer of linguistic genomics, and molecular biologist Dr. Judy Mikovits.

In the presentation, Dr. Martin states, “You cannot have a vaccine that doesn’t claim to result in either immunity or blocking transmission.”  He goes on to say, “By their own patents and reference material, neither Pfizer nor Moderna claims this.  Rather, they only classify their products as ‘gene therapy.'”

Dr. Martin states the Moderna and Pfizer products “do not prevent you from getting the COVID-19 infection, nor do they prevent its spread.  They are really experimental gene therapies — unlike real vaccines, which use an antigen of the disease you’re trying to prevent, the Moderna and Pfizer injections contain synthetic RNA fragments encapsulated in a nanolipid carrier compound, the sole purpose of which is to lessen clinical symptoms associated with the S-1 spike protein, not the actual virus.”

If indeed Moderna and Pfizer corporations are misrepresenting their experimental gene therapies as bona fide vaccines, Dr. Martin states that “the legal ramifications of this deception are immense — from a legal view, both Moderna and Pfizer qualify as using illegal deceptive practices by making medical claims without clinic trial proof of immunity and transmission blocking.  The U.S. Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S. Code, Section 41, outlaws such deceptive practices.”

During the presentation, various entities and individuals were identified as supporters of the above alleged deception, including the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a professor of microbiology and immunology at the University of North Carolina, and other individuals.

Why call an experimental gene therapy product a “vaccine”?  Dr. Martin believes that there are two basic reasons: 1) to circumvent liability for damages, and 2) if the products were called gene therapy or a similar label, most people would wisely refuse to use them.

Regarding avoiding liability for damages, as long as the U.S. is under a state of emergency, things like COVID-19 “vaccines” are allowed under emergency use authorization.  As long as the emergency use authorization is in effect, the makers of these “vaccines” are not financially liable for any damages that comes from their use.  However, Dr Martin states that “there is no liability shield for a medical emergency countermeasure that is gene therapy.”  In fact, if the documentation Pfizer and Moderna provided the Federal Drug Administration for emergency use authorization can be proven fraudulent, then there is no legal protection.

Given the above, a multitude of multi-million-dollar lawsuits are possible, if not probable, against the two pharmaceutical companies by parties who have been “injured” in one way or another by Moderna and Pfizer inoculations.  Depending on the evidence produced, criminal indictments may also be a possibility.

What needs to happen next?  Dr. Martin urges citizens to contact their state attorney, governor, representatives, and anyone else who might be in a position to take action to address and correct what he calls a tremendous fraud on the American people.  He hopes his presentation will be viewed and acted upon by officials with the authority to thoroughly investigate his findings.

He states, “Defense contractors are violating FTC law, and gene therapy companies — not vaccine manufacturers — are conducting experimental trials under deceptive medical practices.  They’re making claims of being ‘vaccines’ without clinical proof, and must be held accountable for their deceptive marketing and medical practices.”

The need for accountability extends to anyone who promoted the use of the Moderna and Pfizer products while having full knowledge that they were not bona fide vaccines as described herein.

Dr. Martin states, “World governments and global and national health organizations are all complicit in this illegal deception and must be held accountable.”

In conclusion, Dr. Martin makes a most sobering comment: “These injections are not vaccines.  They do not prevent infection, they do not render you immune, and they do not prevent transmission of the disease.  Instead, they alter your genetic coding.”

Given the above, perhaps it is time for several state attorneys general to band together and thoroughly investigate the activities of Moderna, Pfizer, and various individuals in this matter.  This could develop into a similar cooperative multi-state effort reminiscent of the 1998 Big Tobacco lawsuit.  In this action, 52 state and territory attorneys general ultimately signed a Master Settlement Agreement with the four largest tobacco companies in the U.S. to settle dozens of state lawsuits brought to recover billions of dollars in health care costs associated with treating smoking-related illnesses.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/03/what_if_the_covid19_vaccines_are_not_really_vaccines.html

Did one escape a terrorist attack in Nice (Alpes-Maritimes)? The arrest of a man armed with a knife on the night of Tuesday to Wednesday, March 15 to 16, immediately after a violent robbery, could point to this, RTL reports. At around 1am, a Crime Prevention Brigade group arrested a 19-year-old man with a bloody knife in his hand. The man had just attacked a transgender person in the city centre of Nice, stabbing her with a knife on the cheek, shoulder, arms and hands.

The man fled when he saw the police officers and shouted the Islamic battle cry “Allahu akbar” towards them several times and added: “Shoot me, I want to die as a martyr, I want to go to paradise”. The Bac officers were able to subdue the rampaging man without using weapons and push him to the ground. In addition to the knife, the officers also found a bank card on the suspect that was not in his name. A man who had accompanied him was also arrested. The stabbing victim was hospitalised but is not in danger of death. The national anti-terrorism prosecutor’s office has not been called in, but is following the case closely, as RTL reports. As a reminder, Nice has already suffered two Islamist attacks: one on July 14, 2016, when a jihadist at the wheel of a heavy truck ran over several dozen people on the Promenade des Anglais; and a second on October 29, 2020, when three people had their throats slit by a terrorist in the Basilica of Notre-Dame.

https://www.valeursactuelles.com/regions/provence-alpes-cote-dazur/alpes-maritimes/nice/faits-divers/un-individu-qui-voulait-mourir-en-martyr-interpelle-apres-une-attaque-au-couteau-a-nice/

In Düsseldorf, an 18-year-old young Ukrainian woman, who had just been granted refuge in the Federal Republic of Germany as a war refugee, was allegedly raped jointly by a Tunisian and a Nigerian. Now the woman has fled from Germany to Poland – because she no longer feels safe in Germany.

They flee from the war to the supposedly safe, cosmopolitan, peaceful West – only to find that another kind of war has long since begun here: Shortly after their arrival in Germany, more and more Ukrainian women are having unpleasant experiences with the special legal conditions that have been created since 2015 in favour of African-Arab trouble migration – and which have often turned women in particular into a kind of fair game: Just a few days after the German government opened the German borders without any controls for (actual and alleged) refugees from Ukraine, the “intercultural exchange” of a special kind has now taken place.

The 18-year-old had been accommodated together with the two 37- and 26-year-old suspects on the hotel ship “Oscar Wilde” in Düsseldorf, which serves as refugee accommodation. There, both men allegedly brutally raped her. The suspects are currently in pre-trial detention; how little the authorities in Germany know about the identity of their taken-in protégés is shown by the fact that the Tunisian was originally thought to be an Iraqi. Both men, bizarrely, are also said to be in possession of Ukrainian citizenship. In the meantime, the Düsseldorf victim fled from the ” diverse ” Germany to Poland – for fear of further assaults.

Already last week, young Ukrainian women were harassed immediately after their arrival in Berlin; some were stalked, others were offered “sleeping places” in exchange for sexual favours. According to eyewitnesses, the pushy men were also “with a migration background”.

Once again, the disastrous consequences of unchecked, unrestrained and uncontrolled mass immigration, in which the socialisation and cultural background of the so-called refugees and the resulting potential for conflict are not taken into account at all, are revealed here. Ironically, the sex crime in Düsseldorf happened on the same day that Federal Minister of the Interior Nancy Faeser ( Social Democratic Party of Germany) had stated in an interview: “The very largest part of the refugees are Ukrainians. People from other countries who already had a permanent right of residence in Ukraine bring this status with them. They also do not have to undergo an elaborate asylum procedure”.

Heiko Teggatz, head of the federal police union, said about the Düsseldorf case: “Politicians should now do everything to ensure that such terrible cases of rape, as on the hotel boat in Düsseldorf, do not become more frequent. Harsh and swift punishment followed by deportation as a consequence is the only way of dealing with such perpetrators.” He also renewed the criticism of quite a few German police authorities and the Federal Police of the irresponsible renewed mass admission with the de facto undermining of any border control: “Smuggling, trafficking in human beings and the promotion of prostitution belong to the same delinquency category. If these criminal networks are not decisively countered at the point of arrival in Europe and Germany, criminal gangs will shamelessly exploit the plight of people from Ukraine. Young women from Ukraine are the focus of these criminals.”

Ukrainian women are now threatened not only by rape: Oliver Malchow, Federal Chairman of the Police Trade Union, warned that they could also become victims of human traffickers: “These crimes are primarily committed by Eastern European criminals. They target women at railway stations in larger cities, but also near the border.” This involves illegal employment in prostitution, but also in the care of the elderly or as cleaners.

For Federal Minister of the Interior Faeser, none of this should be anything new. She was warned early on by the authorities under her authority that further migration flows to Germany were threatening in the slipstream of the Ukraine crisis. Last Friday, in a detailed interview, Teggatz had also already forcefully pointed out the numerous failures of German migration policy, which had learned nothing from the loss of control in 2015. In particular, he had called for “stationary border controls” in which “the respective EU member state” announces “that entry and exit can only take place via certain border crossings.” Only in this way could the federal police “channel the flow of refugees and almost completely control who enters our country”.

Teggatz also rejected Faeser’s unfounded claim that people from other countries who have a permanent right of residence in Ukraine do not have to undergo an elaborate asylum procedure in Germany. The minister is wrong. If, for example, an Iraqi is studying in Kiev, his Ukrainian residence permit does not entitle him to enter the Schengen area. A separate visa is needed for that.”

He took a similar approach to Faeser’s statement that the “vast majority of the refugees” are Ukrainians: “A large proportion of the refugees from Ukraine do not have Ukrainian citizenship. They are third-country nationals from regions outside the EU with a residence permit for Ukraine. These people actually have to undergo the asylum procedure, including identity determination.”

So the problems and inadequacies of the policy she advocates have been known to the Minister of the Interior from the very beginning. Now they have caused their first (known) victim. Unfortunately, it will certainly not be the last.

https://www.wochenblick.at/brisant/deutschland-zu-gefaehrlich-vergewaltigte-ukrainerin-fluechtet-nach-polen/

Its not even noon yet and I have had a number of depressing conversations with medical professionals and other people involved with the research of Vaxx consequences.

I heard of a little girl, 7 years old, who died shortly after getting one of the shots, sort of required in US schools. I say sort of because although the schools stopped short of mandates per se, they did get groups of nurses into the schools to inject children after a consent form was signed by parents.

The autopsy read: “Covid complications.”

The one thing vaxx death reports all have in common, is the Auschwitz level standard of cynicism. Like the gate to the slave labour/death camp said: “Work shall make you free”. Presumably meaning you will be free from slave labour work when we, or it kills you.

“Covid complications” in this case likely means, they gave her a shot they said would prevent covid and it killed her.

There is a lot more to report on today. But don’t let the Kabuki war distract you too too much. The Vaxx damage and Covid policy damage should still be front and centre.

By J.B. Shurk

The Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant (officially the Vladimir Lenin Nuclear Power Plant) in Ukraine lies just outside the abandoned town of Pripyat, about sixty miles north of Kyiv and ten miles from the southern border of Belarus.  It is the site of the catastrophic 1986 nuclear accident that took the lives of hundreds from acute radiation syndrome, left unknown thousands with cancer, and poisoned the surrounding environment.  It cost nearly a hundred billion dollars to contain, required over a half-million recovery workers to decontaminate the area, and killed or disabled a third of the Russians, Belarusians, Ukrainians, Latvians, Estonians, and others involved in that cleanup.  Those workers, as well as the surrounding populations, have all experienced increased rates of miscarriages, cancer, and life-threatening ailments.  Had so many not sacrificed themselves to contain the fallout, however, Ukraine, Belarus, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, and much of Germany could have become uninhabitable for more than a century.

Chernobyl is back in the news because Russian troops have taken control of the area during their invasion of Ukraine.  The International Atomic Energy Agency and European nations throughout the continent are understandably nervous about this predicament, but this essay is not about those concerns.  It is about the lessons Western governments should have learned from that nearly apocalyptic event but instead ignored during the last two years of COVID mania.  

As details concerning the Chernobyl disaster became available after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the West reached the inescapable conclusion that the tragedy could have occurred only in a closed off socialist system in which the State preserves its authority by maintaining a false image of always being correct and never being wrong.  The lessons were clear:

(1) When “science” must be State-sanctioned, then the objectivity required to foresee and correct problems disappears. 

(2) When dissent and conflicting analysis are treated as “misinformation” or “disinformation,” then truth is routinely treated as a lie.

(3) When concerns for national security and a culture of official State secrets dominate all government operations, then censorship of facts and viewpoints prevent timely problem-solving. 

Institutional lies have life-and-death consequences.  The Chernobyl nuclear explosion was both a consequence of government lies and a blaring warning against closed socialist systems, “official truths,” and State-controlled censorship.  Still, the West disregarded all of this during COVID and followed the Soviets’ example.

HBO aired a five-part miniseries on Chernobyl in 2019, and the well done effort to catalogue the fateful events leading up to the nuclear blast masterfully exposes how State lies and State secrets lead to profound human tragedy.  As the series moves back and forth from conversations among engineers at the power plant to high-level discussions among political apparatchiks advising Soviet president Gorbachev, nearly everyone involved is incapable of processing the overwhelming evidence that a nuclear explosion had occurred because doing so would mean that the “system” had failed horrendously.  It was easier to embrace the lie that everything was fine than to acknowledge that the Soviet model was capable of error.  

When a dissenting scientist repeatedly expresses his belief that a reactor meltdown and explosion has occurred, the power plant’s director calls his analysis “disgraceful.”  “I understand you’ve been saying dangerous things,” he scolds the professor, before accusing him of spreading outright “disinformation.”  At another point during the series, as the team on the ground struggles to dispose of radioactive graphite, only to learn that the Soviet government has intentionally lied about the seriousness of the incident to the Germans providing equipment inadequate for the monumental task at hand, an exasperated party member (who already knows he will one day die from exposure) sardonically moans, “The official position of the State is that a global nuclear catastrophe is not possible in the Soviet Union.”  

It is impossible to watch this show, released over six months before people first heard about COVID, without concluding that it was a remarkably prescient description of Western governments’ reactions to the pandemic.  What has been the most terrifying aspect of these last two years of unconscionable lockdowns, mandates, maskings, and forced injections?  It was not the COVID-19 virus or the illness and death it has caused.  It was Western governments’ near-unanimous declarations that the State is always correct in its assessments of scientific problems and that the application of force against citizens is justified.  

When the pandemic was beginning and health officials declared cloth masks ineffective, State science was above reproach.  When health authorities changed their minds months later and declared cloth masks mandatory, State science was still above reproach.  Now that once again the weight of evidence has proved that masks did next to nothing to mediate the spread of disease, the State science has flipped but still claims a record of infallibility.  More and more evidence is proving that lockdowns and reckless government spending did nothing but destroy small businesses, family savings, and national economies.  Still, those who resisted house arrest, financial destitution, or other State-ordered threats to liberty were labeled criminals or worse, domestic terrorists.  Just as with Chernobyl, protecting the authority of the State by hiding its (often ridiculous) lies has been more important than saving actual lives.

When dissenting scientists repeatedly tried to warn about the harm lockdowns would have on childhood development, timely cancer treatment, drug and alcohol dependency, and rates of suicide, their concerns were dismissed as contrary to the mission of the State.  When dissenting scientists questioned the need for widespread dissemination of synthetic mRNA “vaccines” when evidence for the enduring effectiveness of natural immunity was increasingly strong, they were labeled “anti-vaxxers” and “science deniers” deserving of scorn.  When dissenting scientists warned about using mRNA “vaccines” without first performing critical long-term studies on their potential side-effects, they were deplatformed from government-controlled social media, censored on YouTube and Facebook, and scrubbed from internet search engines.  Yet an awful lot of what has been labeled as “misinformation” or “disinformation” by the West’s State-corporate globalist cartel these last two years has proven to be either likely or one hundred percent true.  For those COVID- or “vaccine”-related issues that remain uncertain, the CDC, the FDA, or individual pharmaceutical companies have taken it upon themselves to hide or bury the information from public view.  Still to this day, the question of whether COVID-19 was developed in a Chinese lab funded by American taxpayers has been shrouded by Intelligence Community obfuscation.  Were there any doubt before, it is indisputable that state secrets — Soviet or Western — always come before public health.

Nothing the West has done in response to COVID distinguishes it from the Soviets’ handling of the preventable Chernobyl tragedy.  After brute force used against citizens from Australia and New Zealand to Austria and Democrat-controlled cities in the U.S., Canada’s recent “emergency” declaration and bank account confiscation against protesting citizens proved just how Sovietized the West has become.  The worst part is that everything done against us has been repeatedly defended as for our own good. 

As an old communist in the Chernobyl miniseries exclaims before a rousing ovation: “The State tells us it wants to prevent a panic.  Listen well!  It’s true, when the people see the police, they will be afraid.  But it is my experience that when the people ask questions that are not in their own best interest, they should simply be told to keep their minds on their labor and leave matters of the State to the State.  We seal off the city.  No one leaves.  And cut the phone lines.  Contain the spread of misinformation.  That is how we keep the people from undermining the fruits of their own labor.” 

Tell me that doesn’t sound just like Justin Trudeau, Jacinda Ardern, or Joe Biden.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/03/chernobyl_and_the_lies_of_covid.html

Indonesia is not only popular for its scenic beauty, but lately it has also become notorious for arresting more and more people for “blasphemy”, Aleteia reported on Friday March 11. Muhammad Kacé and Jozeph Paul Zhang, two Christian Youtubers from Indonesia, have been arrested for this reason in recent months for advocating the Christian religion. The Indonesian internet is currently the scene of a war between Muslim and Christian preachers, Medium tells us. This conflict, which is not limited to mere exchanges of words, has already sentenced 72 Christians to long prison terms.

Although there has always been an anti-blasphemy law in Indonesia, it has been observed that convictions in this area have been increasing, which is evidence of the return of blasphemy as a social indicator that influences people’s way of thinking, analyses Aleteia. Indonesia, the fourth most populous country in the world with 264 million people, is the largest Muslim country in the world – ahead of India and Pakistan. And although the country is historically known for practising a moderate Islam, as the religion was introduced through trade relations rather than weapons, a radicalisation of Islam has been observed for a number of years. This was made possible by the arrival of successful preachers who introduced the rhetoric of Wahhabi Islam imported from the Gulf states.

https://www.valeursactuelles.com/monde/indonesie-la-loi-anti-blaspheme-de-retour-72-chretiens-emprisonnes/