They thought they were safe! Germany plans vaccinations for Ukrainian refugees

Germany’s Health Minister Karl Lauterbach (SPD) is planning Corona vaccinations for Ukrainian refugees. Ukrainians will be escaping a war zone just to face another hurdle to their well-being.

“There will be easy-to-understand information sheets in Ukrainian for this,” Lauterbach told German Spiegel magazine. The shots will be forced on refugees at every medical contact point in Germany, of which there may be quite a few.

He also wanted to “offer uncomplicated quick tests for refugees,” Lauterbach announced. “People who come from the war zone also need medical help and protection against infections,” said the minister without specifying these infections they would need to be protected from. “We will take care of that.”

According to the Federal Ministry of Health, only about a third of Ukrainians have taken the jab, but soon they will have no choice but to take the deadly experimental gene-therapy shot. A third of them received the Chinese vaccine Sinovac, which is not approved in the EU, reported German daily Die Welt.

American cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough has meanwhile called for an end to the injury-inducing Covid jabs. The “crisis is over,” the renowned physician said.

He warned of the danger of taking these shots. The products that Pfizer,Moderna and others have developed “are not sufficiently safe enough, nor are they effective enough, to have mandated upon us in our lives”.

McCullough added: “Over a million Americans have been injured as a result of Covid-19 vaccination, and sadly, thousands have died afterwards.” And the poor Ukrainian refugees thought they had finally made it to safety…

https://freewestmedia.com/2022/03/06/they-thought-they-were-safe-germany-plans-vaccinations-for-ukrainian-refugees/

Two French high schools are attacked on Twitter for a video mocking Islam

This short, 10-second video was uploaded to Twitter on Friday evening, March 4. The video was called ” controversial” by the Twitter account of Tajmaât, a platform for cooperation and community for North Africans. It shows two youths lying on the ground and imitating a Muslim prayer. According to the Taâjmat account, these youths are “making fun of Islam by imitating Muslims”. It happens in a room that looks like a classroom. You can hear the word prophet, laughter and see an adult in a tie videotaping the scene. ” Their teacher,” Tajmaât says.According to this tweet, the incident took place in a school in La Roche-sur-Yon (Vendée). Tajmaât asks the school authorities in Nantes: “Isn’t there a problem?”.

At first it was said that this incident had been videotaped at the Lycée Mendès-France. At noon on Saturday, the school management had not yet reacted to our reports. Then the Tajmaât claim mentions the Lycée Notre-Dame-du-Roc in another post. Contacted by France Bleu Loire Océan, the director Serge Daniel denies it. He states that “this video does not concern the Lycée Notre Dame du Roc. It was not videotaped at the school. We will therefore file a complaint for defamation”.
The Académie de Nantes denies any involvement of the two high schools mentioned.

Shortly before 1 p.m., the Académie de Nantes informed in an email “that, after verification, the video was not shot in either of the two schools cited.”
The person in charge of the Tajmaât account replied at around 6pm on Saturday: “We don’t have any more details at the moment, but regarding this incident, we have received messages from internet users who want to denounce the behaviour of the students and the teacher to the school authorities.”
In October, police patrols had to be mobilised in Nantes near the Lycée Guist’hau after a video was posted on the internet of a private party where young people made a parody of a Muslim prayer.www.francebleu.fr

https://www.fdesouche.com/2022/03/05/deux-lycees-yonnais-mis-en-cause-sur-twitter-pour-une-video-se-moquant-de-lislam-lun-va-deposer-plainte/

Eyewitness report: “Christian sluts” – “students” from Muslim countries tried to rape fleeing Ukrainian women

Master of Arts Christan Zeitz has maintained good contacts in Eastern Europe for many years, especially in Ukraine, and knows the situation there very well. Therefore, he was able to report to broadcaster AUF1 about the situation on the ground.

From minute 14:15: Christian Zeitz does not want to conceal a piece of information that he hinted at earlier.

There have been horrific scenes in the forests outside the border of Poland, where natives from Muslim countries, who have had the status of scholarship holders at universities there, from Syria, from the Maghreb and from Black Africa, who have thought, now we are improving, we will not stay in Ukraine, we will mingle with the refugees, with the Ukrainian women, and see that we get to Poland and from there to Germany or Austria, These people – you can’t generalise, but they are not isolated cases – have called Ukrainian women Christian sluts and subhumans and insulted them, and I know of cases that I can prove from first-hand experience that there have been rape attempts on a grand scale and that these people have behaved unbelievably in every respect, one must actually deny them any entitlement to be treated and called refugees.

The complete interview with Christian Zeitz from 4.3.2022 starting at minute 10:45.

Commentary Politikstube: And once they arrive in Germany or Austria, they whine about their suffering and discrimination during their flight from Ukraine, and the helpful do-gooders or organisations and the leading media believe every word they say.

https://politikstube.com/christliche-schlampen-christian-zeitz-studierende-versuchten-fluechtende-ukrainerinnen-zu-vergewaltigen/

Crusaders against crusaders: IS terrorists hope Ukraine war will destroy ‘enemies of Islam’

In its current issue, the weekly newspaper of the so-called Islamic State, Al-Naba, has had its say on Russia’s attack on Ukraine. It advises Muslims to stay out of the current conflict, saying it is about “crusaders against crusaders”. What’s more, the radical IS supporters hope that the war will last for a long time and wipe out the “enemies of Islam” in the West.

In the editorial of the March 4 pamphlet, the radical Islamists express their hope that the war will escalate into a protracted conflict “between the crusaders” that could gradually spread across Europe and lead to the destruction of Islam’s enemies.

This opposes the IS terrorist group to the alleged 10,000-strong fighting force from Chechnya that has left for Ukraine on behalf of Putin ally Ramzan Kadyrov. With the war, it has been proven how false the “values of the West” allegedly are, which can also be seen in the alleged unequal treatment of Muslims at the borders.

https://exxpress.at/is-terroristen-hoffen-dass-ukraine-krieg-feinde-des-islams-vernichten-wird/

Sweden: Woman sentenced to six years in prison for handing her son over to Islamic State as a child soldier

A 49-year-old woman has been convicted of war crimes and violations of international law, Le Figaro reports. On Friday March 4, the Swedish woman, who had joined the Islamic State (IS) organisation in Syria, was sentenced to six years in prison. She was accused of having her son, aged 12 to 15, recruited as a child soldier for the jihadist group. This was announced by the court in Stockholm in a press release.

Specifically, the teenager, named Joan, had died in the conflict as a 16-year-old in 2017, as we had reported in an earlier article. However, his mother had “not acted appropriately to prevent the boy’s recruitment”, “nor did she want to prevent it, his role as a child soldier was in line with her religious beliefs”, the court stated, whose remarks were quoted by the newspaper.

It was the first time that a case of the recruitment of a child soldier, i.e. – according to Swedish law – a child younger than 15, was tried in the Nordic country. Most Swedes or Swedish residents who have joined IS – their total number is estimated at around 300 – cannot be prosecuted for their mere association with the jihadist organisation. This is because the Swedish law criminalising this crime was only passed after the wave of departures to Syria, the national newspaper reminds us. In this way, convictions remain rare when other charges can be investigated. The first “returnee” of the terrorist organisation convicted in Sweden was sentenced in March 2021 for taking her son to the Levant.

https://www.valeursactuelles.com/monde/suede-une-femme-condamnee-a-six-ans-de-prison-pour-avoir-laisse-son-fils-devenir-enfant-soldat-de-letat-islamique/

Guarantee Ukraine’s Neutrality and Stop the Senseless Carnage

By Vasko Kohlmayer

It is hard not to be deeply shaken by the unfolding tragedy in Ukraine. Terrible though it may be, it was not, however, unexpected. By taking matters into his own hands, Vladimir Putin did what he had warned he would do in the years leading up to this crisis. Putin has always made it clear that NATO in Ukraine was a red line for Russia. Having realized that his concerns would never be properly addressed by his western counterparts, Putin decided to take radical action to stop the alliance’s expansion.

The Ukrainian people have already paid a heavy price, which will almost certainly grow much greater if this conflict is allowed to continue. And even though there is now no intention among the players involved to broaden the field of military operations, there is always a very real danger of escalation as these kinds of contingencies tend to be highly unpredictable.

There is, however, an easy way to put an end to this calamitous situation. This can be done by western guarantee that Ukraine will stay militarily neutral for the foreseeable future.

This is the only reasonable and moral course to take under present circumstances.

It is important to acknowledge the hard reality that Ukraine will not become part of NATO anytime soon. Vladimir Putin has made it sufficiently clear that he is not going to allow this to happen, and he is willing to fight to the death over this issue. It is not a fight we want to get pulled into, not least because America does not have a vital national interest in Ukraine as such, much less in Ukraine being part of NATO. That by itself should suffice to keep us from confronting Putin over this matter.

Ukraine has never been part of NATO. Have we suffered some hardship, danger, distress, disadvantage, or loss because of it? Things were just fine for us – as well as the rest of the world – with Ukraine not being in NATO. Why should we now suddenly risk a conflict with Russia over Ukraine’s entry into that organization?

We also need to keep in mind that if we should foolishly engage Putin in some kind of military fashion, such a clash could easily escalate into a nuclear exchange which would almost certainly end in mutual annihilation or something close to it.

By guaranteeing Ukraine’s military neutrality, we would not lose anything we did not have before. The fact is that for much of their history Ukrainian territories have either been part of Russia or within Russian sphere of influence. Ukraine has never been an integral part of the western military apparatus. To insist that it becomes part of it at this point in time is irresponsible and reckless.

By agreeing to Ukraine not being part of NATO, nothing would be taken away from us. We would neither be militarily weakened, nor would we be impoverished economically. Ukraine’s absence from NATO does not put us in any worse position than we were a week ago, a year ago or a decade ago. Has Ukraine not being in NATO ever been a serious problem for us?

Everything considered, the status quo has been very good. Since the fall of the Berlin Wall nearly thirty-three years ago, most of Europe felt safer than ever before. It is difficult to remember any period in history when the majority of Europeans felt so safe and secure. This happy state of affairs, however, has been needlessly undermined by the notion of expanding NATO all the way to Russia’s lengthy border with Ukraine. It is because of this misguided idea and the insensitivity with which it has been pursued that large areas of Europe now justifiably fear the possibility of war. Europe suddenly does not feel so safe and stable anymore.

It is, however, not only the safety of Europe that has been deeply shaken. Americans should start worrying too as Putin has begun rattling his nuclear sabre. We have all heard that he has placed Russia’s nuclear armaments on high alert. What you have probably not heard is that the other day a Russian nuclear submarine suddenly emerged off the coast of the United States. It apparently arrived there undetected by U.S. tracking systems. This submarine carries 150 nuclear warheads. Just the payload of this one Russian underwater craft could end the United States as we know it.

Given that Ukraine is not of vital national interest to America, we need to seriously ask ourselves this question: Do we want to be potentially annihilated over the issue of Ukrainian NATO membership?

The expansion of NATO to the Russian border is an overreach by western globalists. Seeking to tip the existing balance of power between the West and Russia, it is a provocation that could not but invite a response. John F. Kennedy was seen as a national hero by his firm stand against the Soviet Union when it sought to establish a military base in Cuba. Cuba does not even have border with the United States and our capital is much further from the edge of that country than Moscow is from the Ukrainian border. And yet we could have not tolerated Soviet presence on that island.

When Putin pleaded with and then warned NATO not to seek a similar arrangement for Ukraine, he was haughtily dismissed by western elitists such as Joe Biden and NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg, former Prime Minister of Norway. And now they claim they are shocked and repulsed by Russia’s actions. They are either naïve or disingenuous. I suspect that latter is the case.

Keeping Ukraine neutral does not mean that Ukraine will somehow be lost to the West. It will continue to be a part of the global community and member of many of its organizations, associations and arrangements. Ukraine’s international situation will be as it was before.

It also does not mean that Ukraine may not be able to eventually enter the western military alliance. The neutrality agreement can include provisions that would allow for this issue to be revisited and renegotiated at some point in the future.

Be that as it may, it is highly irresponsible now to insist that Ukraine retain the option of joining the alliance in the short or medium term, because the Russians have made it amply clear that they will simply not allow this to occur. This is the red line for them, which is something we should respect, especially since their position is not at all unreasonable. We must understand that the Russians feel the same about NATO in Ukraine as we would feel about a Russian base in Cuba.

The world is on the edge now and the Ukrainian people are experiencing the agony of suffering and death. They stand no chance against the onslaught of the much superior Russian forces, which have been so far acting with relative restraint. Contrary to what we have been hearing from the media, Putin has been trying to minimize the loss of life. Once the Russians switch into full fire mode, however, the Ukrainian people will be dying by tens of thousands.

This can be prevented by granting Ukraine military neutrality.

We must seek peace in the world and cessation of the suffering of the Ukrainian people. It would be immoral not to act this way, especially because we do not have to give up anything that we had before.

Not agreeing to Ukraine’s neutrality will cause untold suffering to the brave people of Ukraine in a war they cannot win. It also runs the risk of a wider military confrontation with potential for a nuclear flare up.

To pursue anything other than peace in this situation would be an act of great moral, human and strategic failure.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/03/guarantee_ukraines_neutrality_and_stop_the_senseless_carnage.html

Islamist staff in French hospitals refuse to treat homosexuals and women and agitate against the country’s secular laws

While Emmanuel Macron’s government is increasingly cracking down on fundamentalist mosques, there are still places that escape state attention. In hospitals in particular, warnings are piling up. The emergency doctor Patrick Pelloux, former columnist for “Charlie Hebdo”, has submitted a report to the government on this issue.

(…) “What you also have to understand is that the staff who work in the hospital have a deep tolerance and are very resilient. So when they are confronted with this kind of assault, whether it is from the Islamic, Catholic or Protestant faithful, they don’t necessarily act on it. During our hearings, a nurse in a hospital in the west of the country told us that one of her colleagues, a fundamentalist Muslim, was proselytising and trying to convert his colleagues. Nobody knew what to do: the directors of the regional health agencies (ARS) often think that the issue is too complex and sensitive. Of course, a section of the left and Islamist activists have been working for years to reverse the issue: Anyone who talks about these issues today is considered a racist. However, this report highlights the religious aberrations, it has nothing to do with “races”.”

And what undesirable developments and dangers were you made aware of?

“The first expression of these radicalisations among hospital staff, external staff or chaplains is sexism and homophobia, even before anti-Semitism, which is never very far behind. These kinds of problems lead doctors to refuse to treat or to use certain techniques, which fortunately is still a very marginal phenomenon. In particular, we had the case of a doctor who refused to perform an organ transplant because it was haram.

“If we are not careful, we may end up with very dangerous, radicalised people in hospital.”

Would you say that the hospital today is a target for fundamentalist or proselytising religious groups?

“Yes, of course the hospital is a target! Look at Baraka City, a humanitarian organisation that was disbanded by the government because of its proximity to Islamist circles, they were based at the hospital! Never forget that the main means of Daech in Syria was access to free healthcare for the population. Free healthcare is not a trifle! Zineb El Rahzoui, who has translated political letters from the Muslim Brotherhood, has shown that their aim, especially in France, was to use the social system and conquer the hospital system.

Marianne

In his report, the emergency doctor warns: “The health and social system is a target of religions, especially of a part of so-called political Islam”. And he gives the example of the Saint Camille hospital in the Val-de-Marne department, which is facing a real problem: “After the closure of a mosque ordered by the Ministry of the Interior, 200 Salafists came to pray in the corridors of the hospital,” the doctor reports.

Religious counsellors were also able to “overstep their role of accompanying the patient to exert influence on staff and patients”, the report says. “Paediatrics, the cancer ward, this is their terrain,” the emergency doctor argues. “Radicalised imams could preach anti-French rhetoric to vulnerable patients, as in psychiatry,” he adds. Le Figaro

https://www.fdesouche.com/2022/03/05/patrick-pelloux-denonce-la-montee-du-radicalisme-religieux-a-lhopital-on-peut-se-retrouver-avec-des-gens-tres-dangereux-a-lhopital-des-imams-radicalises-ont-preche-un-discours-anti-franc/

French constitutional court vows to block Zemmour or Le Pen’s immigration laws if either wins

Conservative candidates Marine Le Pen and Éric Zemmour, if elected, will not be able to end mass immigration to their country without the Senate’s approval, the president of the Constitutional Council, France’s constitutional court, has warned. The news that French courts will block a democratic referendum related to immigration reveals just how powerless people across Europe have become to decide the demographic fate of their countries, as the severe watering down of Switzerland’s referendum vote to implement immigration quotas previously showed.

The idea that France’s top court can decide against the will of the people despite a popular referendum is a perversion of what the court originally stood for. In fact, in 1962, the French constitutional court declared itself incompetent to rule over the constitutionality of laws “adopted by the people following a referendum” since they “constitute the direct expression of national sovereignty.” However, in 2000, the French Constitutional Court partly reversed its 1962 decision by limiting its scope. It marked one of the many decisions that have transformed France from a semi-presidential democratic regime to what looks more and more like a government by judges.

The 2000 ruling is especially notable given what is at stake in the upcoming election. Both Le Pen and Zemmour have declared that they will hold a referendum on ending mass immigration. Perhaps even more importantly, a majority of French say they support such a referendum. Given polling showing seven out of ten French citizens are in favor of ending immigration, there is also a good chance such a referendum would succeed in favor of Le Pen or Zemmour.

The Constitutional Council’s decision to block such a referendum even before it has taken place has been confirmed by Laurent Fabius, who was appointed to the post of president of the Constitutional Council by his friend, Socialist President François Hollande, in 2016 when he was Hollande’s foreign minister.

The Constitutional Court would not only squash an immigration referendum, but would also block the project of the VIth Republic, which is promoted by the best-placed left-wing opposition candidate, Jean-Luc Mélanchon.

In France, the constitutional court is highly politicized, much more so than in Poland, which is nevertheless the country accused by the EU institutions of having a constitutional court that is too politicized and therefore not independent enough to make it legitimate.

In Poland, the Constitutional Tribunal judges are elected for a nine-year term by a simple majority vote in the Sejm, the lower house of parliament, from among persons with legal education and recognized professional experience in the legal field. In France, the Constitutional Council judges are appointed in groups of three for nine years by the President of the Republic, the President of the National Assembly, and the President of the Senate, each of whom alone decides on the choice of his or her own Constitutional Council judges. Those judges are not required to have any knowledge, competence, or experience in the legal field.

The incumbent president of the Constitutional Council, Laurent Fabius, is an old socialist apparatchik. The institution he presides over has authorized, despite their obvious unconstitutional nature in some cases, all the restrictive and discriminatory measures imposed by Emmanuel Macron and his government as part of their strategy against the Covid-19 pandemic.

Even today, France is one of the few EU countries to still make extensive use of a vaccine pass scheme, despite such apartheid-style scheme having proved useless during the current Omicron wave of the pandemic. At the same time, the French branch of the American company in charge of advising the French government for its strategy against Covid and its vaccination campaign, the McKinsey firm, is directed by Victor Fabius, Laurent Fabius’ son.

The first step of the Constitutional Council’s ongoing judicial putsch on the democratic institutions of the Fifth Republic that had been drafted by General de Gaulle and confirmed by the French people in a referendum was carried out in 1971 when the Constitutional judges integrated the preamble of the 1958 Constitution, the preamble of the 1946 Constitution and the 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen into what they called the “constitutionality block.” This way, those judges transformed the Constitutional Council, without asking the French people or its elected representatives, into the guardian of fundamental rights and freedoms based on the general principles it would from that point on derive from those documents.

In 2018, under Laurent Fabius’ presidency, the Constitutional Council further extended the “constitutionality block” to the principle of “fraternity” contained in the motto of the French Republic: “Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité.” The case it was ruling over was about aiding illegal immigration for humanitarian purposes. Thus, France’s Constitutional Council has now made it illegal for the legislative and executive branches of power to punish citizens and organizations engaged in supporting illegal immigration when their activity is non-profit related. The guardians of the French constitution thus decided, without having been elected and without having presented their proposals to the voters, to give legal force to the Republic’s motto, considering that the word “fraternity” in that motto implies “the freedom to help others, with a humanitarian aim, regardless of the legality of their stay on the national territory.”

The French Constitutional Council has thus become an American-style Supreme Court, which was not its role under the 1958 Constitution. This was done without a vote of the people, only by virtue of decisions made by politicians appointed to their positions by their political friends, and without introducing the democratic process that presides over the nomination of Supreme Court Justices in the U.S.

Today, as reported in the weekly L’Express on Feb 23, “for candidates with ‘breakthrough’ programs, the obstacleswill not stop after the presidential election (…): Even if he or she has the 500 endorsements required to run for president and wins the election and then the legislative elections in the wake of it, the new president could find himself or herself prevented from implementing his or her project if it is Marine Le Pen, Éric Zemmour or Jean-Luc Mélenchon.”

Whether it is a matter of deporting illegal immigrants or abolishing family reunification, it goes against the principles recognized as “constitutional” by the French Constitutional Court, even though such decisions are not covered in the 1958 Constitution which was approved by a vote of the French people. They are indeed covered by the “constitutionality block” invented by the Constitutional Council. Therefore, the laws promised by Le Pen and Zemmour, who planned to bypass the Constitutional Council using a referendum like General de Gaulle once did, amount, in the eyes of Laurent Fabius and his colleagues, to changing the French Constitution, which means that a vote of both houses of parliament is required first.

The problem is that the upper house, the Senate, is not elected by direct universal suffrage. It is made up of representatives of local elected officials — the electors — with a six-year term.  It is renewed by half every three years.

As a result, even after a landslide victory for his or her party in the June legislative elections, the new president elected in April could see his or her reforms, particularly in the area of immigration, blocked by a Senate populated by the cronies of the major parties that have alternated in power for decades and have transformed France into a multicultural and increasingly Islamic society.

No wonder a majority of citizens consider that democracy does not work well in France. According to a December poll, half of the French people even think that the state of democracy has deteriorated further under the presidency of Emmanuel Macron, himself a former socialist minister under François Hollande, just like his fellow crony Fabius. Even The Economist, the English liberal weekly, ranked France as a “failing democracy” for the second year in a row in 2021.   Facebook   Twitter   Reddit

https://rmx.news/france/french-constitutional-court-vows-to-block-zemmour-or-le-pens-immigration-laws-if-either-wins/

German public broadcaster leaves Ukraine coverage to Open Society

Especially in times of war, it would be important to get the most reliable and factual information possible, but, “the first casualty of war is always the truth”, as US Senator Hiram Johnson stated in 1914. Today, German public broadcaster ARD in particular relies almost exclusively on “experts” from the Open Society Network in its reporting, which is financed by George Soros to the tune of 32 billion dollars.

Experienced war correspondents are in short supply at ARD right now. On 1 March, ARD reporter Danko Handrik preferred to report from the Slovakian border, where Arabs and Africans are conspicuously over-represented among the “Ukrainian refugees”. Medieninsider.com called ARD “only willing to report under certain conditions”.

Reporting from Kiev was journalist Anna Kosstutschenko from the English-language Ukrainian foreign channel UATV, who joined in from her bathroom. UATV belongs to the oligarch Ihor Kolomoisky, patron saint of Ukrainian President and clown by profession, Vladimir Zelensky.

In ARD’s “Brennpunkt” on Tuesday, presenter Ellen Ehni conducted a tearful interview with Darya Romanenko, head of the civil society NGO “Drukarnia” from Kiev-occupied Slavyansk in eastern Ukraine. Drukarnia is part of the “Deutsch-Russischer Austauschs e.V.” from Berlin, which works closely with other civil society NGOs and was banned from Russia in 2021 for exerting “foreign influence”, a euphemism for regime change operations. Romanenko was identified by ARD only as “an employee of a peace organisation”.

Afterwards, “ARD-Brennpunkt” featured the Ukrainian MP and former education minister Inna Sovsun, who at length reported from Kiev on Russian special forces allegedly shooting children. “Whenever Putin opens his mouth, he lies,” Sovsun declared. Putin wants to destroy “Ukraine” and “the idea of democracy in the world”. It is not clear what kind of audience this child-like depiction was intended for.

Sovsun is a staff member of the think tank CEDOS, which in 2020 received $115 000 from George Soros’ International Renaissance Foundation and $17 000 from the German Green Party’s Heinrich Böll Foundation. In 2016, CEDOS received 124 000 US dollars from the Open Society.

On “ARD-Brennpunkt” on 28 February, presenter Ellen Ehni spoke with Gwendolyn Sasse from the Centre for Eastern European and International Studies ZOiS, who was allowed to speculate about Vladimir Putin’s state of mind. Sasse was an assistant professor at George Soros’ Central European University and met with Goran Buldioski, head of the Open Society Think Tank Fund, and other CEU leaders in 2014, for example, for Merkel advisor Gerald Knaus’ European Stability Initiative.

Ehni then spoke with Giessen-based lawyer Ario Dehghani of the law firm Redcliffe Partners, who lives in Ukraine. Dehghani works with the Anti-Corruption Research and Education Centre (ACREC), which received US$200 000 from Open Society in 2017-2020.

On Monday, Tagesschau interviewed Rebekka Krauß from the association “Space-Eye Regensburg”, an offshoot of the Open Borders NGO “Sea-Eye”, which was launched in November 2018 by Sea-Eye founder Michael Buschheuer.

None of the guests interviewed were labelled as employees of George Soros’ controversial Open Society Foundation.

https://freewestmedia.com/2022/03/04/german-public-broadcaster-leaves-ukraine-coverage-to-open-society/

France: An illegal migrant is convicted for drawing a DAESH flag in the deportation prison

Because of drawings found in his cell in the Centre de rétention administrative (administrative detention centre) Mesnil-Amelot, the arrested man stood trial in Meaux for publicly glorifying terrorism.

Sadiq was accused of glorifying terrorism and damaging his room at the CRA (Centre de rétention administrative) in Mesnil-Amelot. He was taken into police custody and brought before the Criminal Court in Meaux on Wednesday February 23, 2022 to stand trial on immediate summons. He was eventually acquitted but fined.

The Moroccan national, who was staying illegally in France, was placed in the Mesnil-Amelot CRA on Monday February 14, 2022. Three days later, a search of his room revealed several suspicious facts, some of which came under the category of “criminal offences”.

The alerted police officers made the findings and then the seizure: a small drawing of the DAESH flag stuck to the top of the door, a drawing and inscriptions in Arabic scratched on the cupboard door, and numerous sketches of people and weapons (Kalashnikov, knife…) found on him.

In the dock, the accused remained consistent in his statements. He admitted to having made the drawings – Japanese comic book heroes according to him – but denied being the author of the flag and the inlays in the cupboard.actu.fr

https://www.fdesouche.com/2022/03/04/le-mesnil-amelot-juge-pour-avoir-dessine-un-drapeau-de-daesh-au-centre-de-retention/