Allah's Willing Executioners

Together with Ricarda Lang, Omid Nouripour will head the Greens.The choice for the federal chair is logical: a young woman without a migrant background and without professional competence heads the party together with a not-so-young migrant without professional competence.

It goes without saying that they must appoint a woman and a man at the top. And indeed, the visual distinction could not be greater: Here the massive German Ricarda Lang and there the “smart Persian”, as party friends like to call him.

Nouripour was born in Tehran in 1975 and came to Germany 13 years later. In 1997, he began his studies, which he dropped out of in 2002 to become a professional politician on the federal executive committee of the Green Party. In 2006, he replaced Joschka Fischer in the Bundestag, where he is still a member today. From 2009 to 2013, he was his party’s spokesperson on security policy, and since 2013 he has held the office of foreign policy spokesperson. Since then, he has been considered an expert on foreign policy.

Thus, while he did not categorically rule out the military fight against the terrorist organisation Islamic State (IS), he opposed arming Kurdish fighters in the war against them. On the other hand, he was in favour of economic sanctions against Russia. He also spoke out in favour of Ukraine’s accession to the EU, which is hardly feasible in view of current events.

Nouripour is considered the designated successor of Annalena Baerbock, should she resign as Foreign Minister. Here, however, the passionate Eintracht Frankfurt fan must be put off: In Germany, the resignation of politicians was abolished a long time ago.

The politician, who also has Iranian citizenship, is remembered in a particularly inglorious way when he was still on the advisory board of the German-Palestinian Society (DPG). The latter openly sympathised with the anti-Semitic BDS campaign, which called for a boycott of Israeli products.

In April 2013, Nouripour, together with other members of the Green parliamentary group, tabled a minor question in the German Bundestag aimed at labelling goods from Israeli settlements. In this way, it should be made visible whether a product comes from an Israeli settlement or from a Palestinian producer.

The German-Iranian publicist and spokesman of the “Green Party of Iran”, Kazem Mousavi, said: “A member of the democratic Bundestag must not promote and support the worst racist campaign of our time, BDS. The membership of the Iranian-born member of the Bundestag Nouripour in the advisory board of the anti-Israeli DPG not only harms German politics, but first and foremost supports the Holocaust-denying regime in Iran.”

The Muslim Nouripour seems to have a special relationship to Sharia, because he wants to introduce it in parts of Germany. The ex-Muslim civil rights activist Ali Utlu rightly says: “The colour of this party is the same as that of Islam. Green.

The Muslim Nouripour seems to have a special relationship to Sharia, because he wants to introduce it in parts of Germany. The ex-Muslim civil rights activist Ali Utlu rightly says: “The colour of this party is the same as that of Islam. Green. Will they then one day also kill homosexuals and cut off limbs? Nip it in the bud!”

https://jungefreiheit.de/debatte/kommentar/2022/der-neue-gruenen-chef-und-die-scharia/

He (Omid Nouripour, editor’s note) expressed the view in the German Parliament that “the passages [of the Sharia] that are compatible with the constitution can also be applied”. In effect, he was calling for Islamic jurisprudence to be established in Germany, at least in part. How exactly Sharia law, which provides for stoning, flogging or even the death penalty for certain offences, is supposed to be compatible with the German Constitution, Nouripour did not say. Sharia law fundamentally assumes the inferiority of women and provides men with numerous privileges – especially in inheritance law and marriage law. The founder of the Turkish Republic, Mustafa Kemal, abolished it in 1928 as a pre-modern and outdated relic and introduced Swiss civil law in Turkey. The founder of modern Turkey deliberately refrained from adopting any Islamic law. In Germany, a kind of questionable lay judiciary has established itself in Muslim parallel worlds, which places Sharia law above the German rule of law.

https://www.presseportal.de/pm/110332/5135101

There’s hardly a Muslim terrorist attack committed by a single perpetrator in Europe or America in the last five years that the authorities and the media haven’t tried to spin as mental illness.

Both Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa, the Syrian Muslim mass killer who shot up a Boulder supermarket, and Faisal Akram, who took a Texas temple hostage to secure the release of ‘Lady Al Qaeda’, had their attacks blamed on mental illness.

But France continues to lead the world in whitewashing Muslim terrorism as mental illness.

When Sarah Halimi, a 65-year-old Jewish kindergarten director, was murdered by her Muslim neighbor while shouting, “Allahu Akbar”, the authorities gave her antisemitic killer a pass because his pot smoking had supposedly brought on a “psychotic” episode.

The Halimi murder had strong echoes of the previous killing of a Jewish DJ by a Muslim killer where the expert shrink had insisted that “it is not an anti-Semitic act but an act of delirium”

When Mohamed Lahouaiej-Bouhlel, an ISIS Muslim terrorist, drove a truck into a Bastille Day celebration, ran over as many people as he could, and exchanged fire with police until he was killed, his family and the media insisted that he was mentally ill. “Nice Attacker Mohamed Lahouaiej Bouhlel Wasn’t a Jihadist,” an NBC News headline blared even though Bouhlel had been collecting ISIS material and the Islamic terror group took responsibility for the attack.

“This is absolutely not an act of terrorism,” a French prosecutor insisted after another Muslim man rammed into a crowd in Dijon while shouting, “Allahu Akbar” and announced that he did so for the “children of Palestine.” The prosecutor also claimed that he had no religious motives.

These weren’t random decisions. Rather French authorities have been trying to reclassify Islamic terrorism as a psychological problem in much the same way that the Obama administration had deliberately reoriented and destroyed counterterrorism in the United States.

Former French Interior Minister Gerard Collomb had taken to claiming that a third of terrorists have “psychological issues”. This worldview is reflected by France’s FSPRT master list of Islamic Jihadists which serves as the key database for fighting domestic terrorism in France.

Now the Macron government is trying to rewire Europe’s counterterrorism the same way.

A recent memo from France to the Council of the European Union argues that the “Jihadist threat is evolving” to become “independent from terrorist organizations” and that the perpetrators only have “a tenuous or inexistent link to the radical movement” and suffer from “psychological instability or even mental disorders.”    

Additionally, the French memo blames the victims of Islamic terrorism by arguing that the terrorists are triggered by the “the extremely sensitive nature of the notion of blasphemy” which can cause Muslims who are “outside of the jihadist sphere of influence to carry out attacks.”

Within a few paragraphs the French memo to the EU has managed to dismiss the entire idea that Al Qaeda, ISIS, and other Islamic terrorist groups are relevant, then the existence of Islamic terrorism as a whole, reducing it to a question of mentally ill non-terrorists who are triggered by “blasphemy” so that their brutal attacks are really the fault of their non-Muslim victims.

As an example, the French memo to the EU lists the brutal beheading of Samuel Paty, a French teacher, by a Muslim refugee furious over his use of Mohammed cartoons as a teaching tool.

President Emmanuel Macron, at the time, had appeared at the scene and blasted the horrifying murder as “a typical Islamist terrorist attack”.

“They won’t win,” he had declared.

But the EU memo suggests that like previous French presidents, Macron was playing to the crowd, and has no intention of fighting Islamic terrorism, instead he seeks to redefine it.

France currently holds the presidency of the Council of the European Union giving it even more authority than usual and the memo concludes by asking member states to agree to a “six-monthly EU threat assessment in the field of counterterrorism.”

What this amounts to is the Halimi case writ large all across Europe.

Reclassifying Muslim terrorism as mental illness has been a longstanding project of the terrorism deniers. It’s been especially popular in France which due to its laïcité secularism is even more unable and unwilling to grapple with the theological motivations of Islamic terror.

The ‘medicalization’ of terrorism is convenient because it transforms an external threat into an internal social problem which is exactly what the Europeans had been doing with Islamic terrorism for generations. Muslim terrorists can appear paranoid, delusional, and unstable, but psychiatric standards based around a 21st century European middle class urban population are a particularly poor fit for gauging what is normal for a culture entirely outside that worldview.

Whether any Muslim terrorists can indeed be diagnosed as suffering from mental illess is as relevant to the nature of the beast as the number of schizophrenic SS or NKVD killers. Totalitarian movements, whether it’s the kamikazes of Imperial Japan or the suicide bombers of Hamas, often draw on mentally unstable killers who are readier to die for the cause.

But to say that Islamic terrorism is the product of mental illness is in its own way as delusional as reducing WWII to an etiology of the possible mental illnesses that Hitler or Stalin could be diagnosed with. Insane people participating or even leading totalitarian movements doesn’t mean that the problem is mental illness or that it can be solved by taking a few pills a day.

The Macron government’s attempt to shift the emphasis from a religious war to psychological screening is the true delusion here. Releasing Islamic terrorists, as the French government has done, while insisting that they go to therapy sessions is a refusal to grapple with the root causes of immigration, migration, and the ‘mosqueization’ of French cities by Islamic movements.

The Texas temple terrorist attack showed us that the European failure to police its Islamic terror threat isn’t just a problem for Europeans. From the Hamburg cell at the heart of the September 11 attacks to the latest Texas attack, Europe remains a springboard for attacks on America.

And if France succeeds in imposing its medicalized notion of terrorism on the European Union, it will be that much harder to keep it from further corrupting American counterterrorism.

“In our fight against Islamist terrorism, we will never give in,” President Macron had previously promised. The EU memo looks like a Vichy exercise for finding an excuse to surrender.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2022/01/frances-macron-tries-reclassify-muslim-terrorism-daniel-greenfield/

Dr Jane Ruby spoke to embalmer Richard Hirschman for the Stew Peters Show on Thursday about “strange, rubbery” plugs found in the veins of deceased Americans. Hirschman took a number of photos of the “worms”, which were shown during the interview.

Many vaccinated people who end up on Hirschman’s cutting table have died of a heart attack or stroke. He took long, fibrous strings from one of the bodies. The red part looks like a normal blood clot, but the white fibrous material was not normal, Hirschman said.

The embalmer said a blood clot normally breaks apart easily when touched. “But this white stuff is pretty strong,” he explained. “It’s very pliable, it’s very hard. It is not normal.”

“I’ve contacted colleagues and they see the same thing,” he told Ruby. Hirschman added that the number of people with these types of “worms” has increased by 50 to almost 80 percent in recent times. “I am very concerned about the future.”

Hirschman is now trying to figure out what the material consists of. “My gut tells me it’s caused by the vaccine. I can’t prove that, but if this is caused by the vaccine, just imagine how many people will die in the future,” he said.

“If this tissue ends up in your brain, you’ll have a stroke. If it gets in your heart, you’ll have a heart attack. People need to know this,” he emphasized.

When asked how often he encounters these mysterious strings, he replied: “On 20-24 of the 35 people I have embalmed this month.”

https://freewestmedia.com/2022/01/31/embalmers-discover-strange-rubbery-worms-in-bodies-of-the-jabbed/

Isabelle, the mother of Kevin, who was killed by a knife thrust in Avignon in 2013, has to litigate for the fourth time against her son’s murderer, who, after an appeal process, has received two sentences suspended consecutively due to formal errors.Hate has not been a part of her world until now. She herself kept hatred in check when her 21-year-old son Kévin was stabbed to death near her home in the Champfleury neighbourhood of Avignon (Vaucluse) on December 28, 2013. Then, when the investigation revealed that the perpetrator, Samir Kouider, had committed the crime because he disapproved of his sister’s relationship with Kevin. Also during the two subsequent court proceedings, in 2017 in Avignon and two years later in the appeal proceedings in Nîmes. (…) Le Parisien

On January 21, she learned that the Court of Cassation had overturned the Montpellier jury’s verdict of March last year in the third jury trial against the defendant [Translator’s note: After guilt has been established, the court must decide on the sentence at the next trial]. .

“I am fed up. I didn’t want to hate from the beginning, but now it’s come to this. I fought for my other two sons not to have hate.
I told them to believe in justice… What should I tell them now?” asks Isabelle Cauet. (…) Le Dauphiné

https://www.fdesouche.com/2022/01/30/nimes-30-samir-kouider-ecope-de-30-ans-de-prison-en-appel-pour-avoir-tue-kevin-francais-et-non-musulman/

On January 23 Paul Craig Roberts reviewed Kees Van Der Pijl’s new book, States of Emergency. Van Der Pijl answers the question so many people have of why and how a fake “deadly pandemic” was orchestrated with worldwide participation in the fraud.

He shows that the event was long in the making by a global elite consisting of philanthropists such as Bill Gates, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Wellcome Trust, elite organizations such as the World Economic Forum, tech companies and multi-billionaire owners, Fauci at NIH, CDC, FDA, WHO, pharmaceutical companies and lobbyists, and elite organizations and groups created for the purpose of concentrating power and advancing and protecting the global elites’ rule by using fear to condition the masses to being controlled and deprived of a voice and alternative explanations.

I had been thinking along these lines, but lacked Van Der Pijl’s detailed knowledge of the personalities, organizations and groups and the interactions and cooperation between them. He gives us the story. It was an elaborate exercise in massive deception and censorship that was able to discredit the world’s most renowned medical scientists and to elevate pure fiction to fact and public policy.

We owe it to ourselves to read States of Emergency in order to come to terms with the fact that we are ruled by people devoid of integrity to whom truth is an inconvenience and who are concerned solely with their control and power.

We need to read the book also to understand how things really work, how decisions are really made, how careers are made and ended by whether or not you serve the narrative and how well, how regulatory agencies such as FDA, NIH, CDC, WHO are in fact marketing departments for Big Pharma, how politicians’ positions are dictated by the sources of their campaign funds, why universities and the media must function as Ministries of Propaganda for the ruling elites and their narratives, how Fauci and Big Pharma control content in medical journals via grants to medical researchers.

Van Der Pijl writes that pharmaceutical industry research grants make the industry the co-author of many articles and that more than half of all The Lancet‘s revenues come from pharmaceutical companies orders of reprints of articles supportive of their products. Van Der Pijl writes “According to the former editor of The New England Journal of Medicine, who had 20 years of experience, it is simply no longer possible to believe much of the published clinical research.”

The gullible, patriotic American who reads this book will have his eyes opened and become a new person. Van Der Pijl has written the book that can save Americans from their insouciance.

In October 2019 just prior to unleashing the “pandemic” on the world, what was about to happen was first tested in a simulation. The participants were: the Bloomberg-financed Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, the Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum, the CDC, the (American trained) head of the Chinese health authority, a former deputy director of the CIA, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, and so on.

The participants were primarily concerned with protecting the planned deception from being exposed. They relied on social media and the presstitutes to control the narrative and censor the truth. They considered whether to close the Internet altogether, but were assured that Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and Google would only allow news in keeping with the narrative and flood the Internet with information that confirms the narrative while discrediting and blocking the truth.

Admiral Stephen Redd of the US Public Health Service thought that people on social media with “negative beliefs,” that is, those who took issue with the narrative, should be tracked down by intelligence services. Singapore’s finance minister said dissidents should be arrested and brought to justice. The head of the Chinese health authority worried that suspicion might arise that the virus originated in a laboratory. Johnson&Johnson wondered if the deaths and injuries in the vaccine trials should be suppressed in order to prevent public suspicion of the poorly tested vaccine.

The participants claim they were just playing a germ game, but the simulation ensured that all was in place to control the explanation prior to the release of the “pandemic.”

The research basis of Van Der Pijl’s book is massive and the information earth-shattering. I intend to return to this book in future articles. But don’t wait on me. Buy the book and read it once, twice, three times. Civil liberty in the US cannot survive if people are too lazy to inform themselves.

When the US government ceased meaningful regulation on the basis of Alan Greenspan’s assertion that “markets are self-regulating” and ceased to enforce its anti-trust laws, massive economic concentration resulted, producing individuals whose wealth greatly exceeded the budgets of public health agencies and even some countries. This gave single individuals enormous power over governments. Van Der Pijl writes that from 2004 onwards, just the annual health grants of the Gates Foundation alone exceeded the annual budget of the World Health Organization.

Gates Foundation directors are executives from Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Bayer Health Care Services, companies whose stocks are owned by the Gates Foundation. This is just a tiny indication of the power that wealth concentration has given a handful of individuals over government policy.

Van Der Pijl believes that the elite’s use of an orchestrated “pandemic” to solidify their control was too ambitious and has failed. What his optimism overlooks is the possibility that another more dangerous virus will be set upon us and the fear created will sap all resistance. The Covid attempt almost succeeded, especially in Australia, Canada, Austria, Italy, and Germany. In the US it was blocked by the judiciary and by governors such as Florida’s Ron DeSantis. A second run at the unorganized and uninformed peoples of the world could succeed.

Is this an indication that a more deadly Coronavirus is about to be released, one for which all treatments have been banned?

https://freewestmedia.com/2022/01/30/a-narrow-escape-from-tyranny-but-the-war-on-freedom-is-not-over/

Is this a hint that he has defected to Eric Zemmour? Valérie Pécresse exchanged views with the deputy leader of her party, Gilles Platret, on Tuesday January 25, with Christian Jacob acting as mediator, as Le Parisien reported on Friday January 28. This is because the mayor of Chalon-sur-Saône is still not sure whether he would support the top Republican candidate, he said.On the other hand, he has not ruled out supporting Eric Zemmour. Gilles Platret confirmed to the daily that he would “withdraw” from Valérie Pécresse’s campaign.

This statement sounds like a reminder of the fundamental points on which they oppose each other, first and foremost the fight against Islamism. The Burgundian politician, who is particularly active on this issue (he had triggered the debate on the abolition of alternative pork menus in school canteens), advocates a ban on Salafism or the wearing of headscarves in public spaces. These positions are also held by Eric Zemmour, but not by the LR female candidate, as Le Parisien notes.

Gilles Platret had confirmed these disagreements by saying that he would “hold Valérie Pécresse accountable” for the presence of Patrick Karam in her team. Patrick Karam was denounced by Eric Zemmour’s team for his proximity to the Islamist milieu, but the latter strongly denied this. These tensions highlight how difficult it is for Valérie Pécresse to incorporate the party’s “ciottist” line, which had been mobilised in the primary, into her manifesto. The loss of a second vice-president after Guillaume Peltier could be a heavy blow for the candidate.

https://www.valeursactuelles.com/politique/en-desaccord-sur-lislamisme-un-vice-president-de-lr-prend-du-recul-par-rapport-a-valerie-pecresse/