Allah's Willing Executioners

by Giulio Meotti‏

The television program Zone Interdite took its cameras to Roubaix, in the north of the country, with 100,000 inhabitants of whom 40 per cent are Muslim. The result is a shocking picture of Islamization, which the TV extends to Marseille, Paris and other cities (at the University of Bobigny they show a place to pray in silence).The documentary is worth the two hours it takes to view, but by the end of the first twenty minutes, you understand what a European country becomes where Islam is massively present.

Islamic prayers on the street, full veils everywhere, Islamic bookstores and butchers on every corner, shops that come with niqabs, soft toys and children’s books without faces because in Islam it is forbidden, restaurants with areas reserved for women alone, mayors colluding with proselytism, Koran and Arabic lessons in schools…

Faceless toys sold to parents anxious to respect an ultra-radical version of Islam that prohibits the representation of human beings caused a particular sensation. A saleswoman says the children are adjusting and that it “doesn’t bother them at all.”

Zone Interdite has brought to light a reality that many still refused to see, but which now no one can deny. The situation is much more serious than some believed. Thus, the habits and customs of totalitarian Afghanistan take root under the gaze of the French public authorities.

“As we procrastinate entangled in our concern for the law and our fear of being racist, Islamists know what they want,” comments journalist Elisabeth Lévy. “Afghanistan is two hours from Paris,” writes Eric Zemmour.

Today there are 10 percent Muslims in France. What do the French think will happen to their country when they will be 20-30 percent?

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/321551

Austria Embraces Communism: ‘To Fight a Chinese Virus, We are Introducing the Chinese Social Model’ (Video) | Austria’s vaccine mandate law will take effect on February 1, 2022. Despite the evidence that the “vaccine” does not protect people from Covid but increases the chances of infection from Mild Omicron and hospitalization, last week, the Austrian Parliament approved mandating the experimental mRNA gene therapy injections. From mid-March, the law will see adults (residents aged 18 and older) who refuse the jabs […]

Who is the man who stabbed his ex-girlfriend 59 times in the car park of a school in Toulon on December 13, 2017? Mohamed Meghraoui was sentenced to 30 years in prison on appeal on Friday.

The second trial in Aix-en-Provence allows insight into the motive of the family man found guilty of the “attempted murder” of Aurélie , the mother of their three children.

That day, the nurse went to pick up her youngest son from the kindergarten “Les Œillets”.

She had just buckled him into his car seat when she was stabbed several times. Miraculously, Aurélie survived her injuries.
“They were empty words from her,” defended the man for whom Aurélie had “accepted religious marriage and wearing the veil” .His lawyer, Pavel Debanne, warns the jury against xenophobic or Islamophobic prejudices.(…) Nice Matin

https://www.fdesouche.com/2022/02/01/touche-dans-sa-fierte-dalgerien-mohamed-meghraoui-labbadi-juge-pour-tentative-de-meurtre-a-toulon-56-coups-de-couteau/

After a mad drive on the A100 motorway with several people seriously injured, the Berlin Regional Court ordered the further placement of the accused in a psychiatric hospital.

The presiding judge justified the decision on Monday, saying that the man had acted out of a pathological mania. The man, who had acted while incapable of contracting guilt, continued to pose a high risk to the general public due to a serious illness.

The Iraqi is alleged to have first rammed his car into several vehicles and then hit three motorcyclists on the Berlin city motorway in August 2020.

“He intended to kill accidental victims,” the senior prosecutor’s plea said. The 31-year-old drove at breakneck speed and “deliberately hunted down motorcyclists” with his car.

Legally, these three cases are to be considered attempted murder. Some of the victims had suffered life-threatening injuries and are still suffering physically and psychologically from the consequences.

“People were meant to die”, the judgement continued. An Islamist motivation had not been established. However, the man’s madness “contained religious and Islamist elements”.

Because the 31-year-old was not willing to take medication, he could “be expected to become acutely psychotic again at any time”. The court also imposed a five-year driving ban.

With the sentence, the judges essentially followed the motions of the representative of the Attorney General’s Office. The defence lawyers had argued against a further placement in the so-called “Maßregelvollzug”. The decision is not yet final.

https://www.tag24.de/justiz/gerichtsprozesse-berlin/prozess-um-amokfahrt-auf-der-a100-urteil-gegen-raser-gefallen-2312381

On Wednesday, the Austrian Constitutional Court sent the Ministry of Health a list of questions about the pandemic that the official media and their henchmen have considered taboo. 

The Constitutional Court sent Austrian Health Minister Wolfgang Mückstein some questions about the alleged “burden on the health system”. The background is an ordinance review procedure regarding the Corona measures taken by the government in Vienna. The catalog of questions can only be described as explosive due to the political narrative that has been cultivated in the Alpine republic.

The court wanted to know if the figures for deaths and hospitalizations during the pandemic cover all infected people. The question points to the typical manipulation of the data confounding the dead and hospitalized “with Covid” or “from Covid” that has also been used in Austria. “If so, why was this counting method chosen?” the judges demanded.

In addition, the court wanted a breakdown of Covid deaths and hospitalizations, specified by age. Was Covid the cause of the hospitalizations? Had they unnecessarily hospitalized healthy people, due to a positive test exclusively?

Another set of questions was devoted to the effectiveness of wearing the so-called protective masks. Against the background of the spreading Omicron variant, Austria tightened restrictions at the beginning of January. These now also provide for wearing an FFP2 mask outdoors if the minimum distance, which has long been mandatory, cannot be maintained.

The constitutional judges wanted to know from the Minister of Health: “By what factor does wearing an FFP2 mask indoors or outdoors reduce the risk of infection or transmission?”

The Constitutional Court has calculated the risk of mortality “due to Covid” at 0,15 percent and demanded to know how the reduction in risk – absolute and relative – of vaccines should be understood. The Court wanted to know what the absolute risk reduction was after one, two or three injections. These questions underscore the doubt of the judges regarding the official propaganda that the vaccines have been 95 percent effective.

“What does a specified vaccination effectiveness of, for example, 95 percent refer to? What does absolute and relative risk reduction mean in this context?”

The Ministry of Health must also answer to what extent vaccination reduced the risk of contagion of the virus, since vaccinated people also transmit it, no matter how much official propaganda insists on claiming the opposite. “What is the risk of transmission in a person infected with SARS-CoV-2 with a second vaccination three, six or eight months ago compared to an unvaccinated person whose PCR test was negative 24 hours ago?”

In another section of questions, the Court wanted to know the risk of hospitalization after becoming ill and after vaccination, broken down by age groups and number of doses in order to highlight the side effects of vaccinations, which have so far also been ignored in Austria.

Another question that the Court posed was about the excess mortality in 2020 and 2021: Have there been fewer deaths in 2021 than the previous year and if, despite vaccination, was there still excess mortality?

In short, the Austrian Constitutional Court asked the questions that any person capable of thinking for himself, would like answered,

The Corona crisis has already lasted almost two years and Austria has distinguished itself by calling for the most extreme measures.  The measures were justified by claiming that they would be the only way to avoid an excessive burden on the healthcare system and especially on hospitals filled with “Corona patients”.

Dissenting voices and questions about real data have so far been dismissed as inappropriate and reprehensible objections by “Covidiots” and “Corona deniers” to suffering and dying. Politicians had to stick to the advice of “science”. An open-ended discussion of critical questions or opposing positions in the struggle for the most appropriate policy was simply banned.

Many observers were therefore stunned in reading the Austrian Constitutional Court’s relevant questions almost two years after the start of the massive health crisis.

The 47-year-old Mückstein now has until February 18 to adequately answer the 10 questions that are as fundamental as they are detailed.

Just a few weeks ago, politicians and the media and government officials insisted on the “pandemic of the unvaccinated” and imposed a “lockdown for the unvaccinated” on November 15 last year.

From that day on, all residents over the age of twelve were only allowed to leave their own four walls for work or education, shopping for daily needs, visiting the doctor or for physical recreation without proof of their vaccination or recovery. According to a media report on January 15, Mückenstein was certain that “an early relaxation for the unvaccinated […] could quickly lead to an uncontrolled spread of the virus and to an overload of medical care facilities”.

For the judges, however, some questions remained unanswered in this context. By how many percentage points did the prescribed lockdown for the unvaccinated reduce “the risk of infection of an unvaccinated person”.

https://freewestmedia.com/2022/02/01/austrian-constitutional-court-demands-real-covid-data-from-government/

A French municipal council has been criticized for the construction of a reception facility due to accommodate young, unaccompanied migrants, after it emerged the cost to taxpayers will be €5.2 million and it will only house 28 minors, less than half than originally planned.

Local officials defended the building of the child protection establishment in Vern-sur-Seiche, near Rennes on Monday evening at a council meeting.

Anne-Françoise Courteille, vice-president of the Ille-et-Vilaine Departmental Council and delegate for child protection, insisted that it is a “mandatory mission to meet the basic needs of a child,” and explained that in Ille-et-Vilaine alone, 743 isolated young people are cared for, including 358 minors and 385 young people under 22 years of age.

“They come from Morocco, Guinea, Côte d’Ivoire, Algeria, Afghanistan… and more than 97 percent of them are men,” she noted.

Initial proposals showed that the new facility would be equipped to accommodate 66 minors, with the local mayor learning of its drastically reduced capacity via the press back in November of last year.

As well as the economical cost to the council, the societal impact of accepting unaccompanied migrants was also considered at the meeting, with opposition politicians calling on other areas to take on their fair share.

“There should be a fairer distribution according to the population. Vern should accommodate six minors,” objected Laurence Mercier, departmental councilor, highlighting that local young people in need of assistance “would like to have identical conditions.”

Didier Moyon, the former mayor of the town insisted that the “mixing of societies is an opportunity.

“Welcoming refugees is a value that we have made ours,” he added.

Construction of the facility is expected to be completed in April.

https://rmx.news/article/french-council-slammed-for-e5-2-million-taxpayer-funded-facility-to-house-young-unaccompanied-migrants/