Allah's Willing Executioners

For her big dream, Yasmeena Ali was not only disowned by her family, her father had even hired a hitman to kill his daughter. The reason for her relatives’ behaviour is the Afghan’s permissive profession, because Ali is a porn actress – and an extremely successful one at that!

On the platform Pornhub, her sex videos have already been viewed more than nine million times. She even calls herself Afghanistan’s top porn star! But the road to get there was hard and difficult and the 28-year-old had to pay a high price for her success.

“If I left Islam, my father threatened to kill me because I disrespected Islam, Afghan culture and the honour of the family,” Ali tells the New York Post in an interview. But the 28-year-old took the plunge into the porn business and really flourished there.

For years, Yasmeena Ali had lived in Kabul under Taliban rule, and in 2000 her family finally emigrated to Great Britain. But the 28-year-old was not happy there either! According to the newspaper BILD, her life in England was dominated by constraints, the strict religious beliefs of her family almost “suffocated” her.

One day she made a daring decision: escape! The young Afghan wanted to flee her family and the constraints and decided to go to Eastern Europe together with her boyfriend David Cohen. The Jewish erotic photographer and Ali are now happily married and have found a new home in Slovakia.

But her father, Mohammed Patman, and her cousin, Darya Khan Safi, did not want to accept Yasmeena Ali’s new life and profession. Together they flew to Slovakia and searched for the young woman – intending to have her killed by a killer.

“Mr Patman and Mr Safi are believed to have taken steps to murder Ms Cohen (note the civil surname of Yasmeena Ali) because they believed she had shamed her family by her choice of husband, by converting from Islam to Judaism and by her choice of profession,” the Bild newspaper quotes a court statement in possession of the Daily Mail.

In addition, the hitman also came clean in court and said that he had been offered 70,000 US dollars to kill Ali. Yasmeena’s father and cousin were arrested by the police and now have to answer for it in court.

“My parents always instilled fear in me – God, hell, punishments,” the 28-year-old tells the New York Post. She has since cut off all contact with her family and relatives. She does not regret her step into the adult industry. On the contrary!

“At the end of the day, it’s my life and I don’t care how people react to my career. I follow my heart and do what I want because it is my life, my body and my right,” Yasmeena Ali states unequivocally.

http://www.lessentiel.lu/de/panorama/story/une-afghane-a-fui-les-talibans-et-fait-du-porno-31552504

According to Deutsche Welle, the German Historic Museum has prepared an exhibition about Karl Marx as a constantly relevant thinker who was “ahead of his time in at least five different areas.” In short, it presents Marx as the father of our times.

Information about the exhibition praises Marx as the founder of social policy, a critic of capitalism and a cosmopolitan. Yes, it does note that Soviet totalitarianism and the East German collaboration system referred to Marx and that his works were of an anti-Semitic character, but declares those issues to no longer be relevant to his legacy.

The USSR had fallen, the GDR (so called German Democratic Republic — the communist state established by Soviets in East Germany) is gone, and anti-Semitism is usually condemned. The rest is deemed as “interesting.”

This type of analysis of Marx’s work replicates a well-known blueprint: the execution was sometimes poor, but the ideas were not; totalitarian governments were awful, but that does not strip the revolutions which preceded them of their grandeur. Therefore, it is worthwhile reminding them of the ideas behind those revolutions and all of the other “interesting” aspects.

The “Communist Manifesto,” which was written by Marx and his friend Friedrich Engels, had entailed, since the very beginning, the “overthrowing of the hitherto social system through violence.” This was written during the times in which traditional monarchies, which shaped the nations of Europe, were taking parliamentary and constitutional forms. For the manifesto’s authors, this was all worthless because “law, morality and religion” were deemed as “bourgeoisie superstitions” behind which stood particular bourgeoisie interests.

The “Manifesto” outright postulated the “removal of the family” and mocked “bourgeoisie platitudes about family and upbringing and the touching relation between parents and children.” The family was the foundation and basic community of the entire social system at the time, which had to be “overthrown through violence.”

The document also spoke about the complete uprooting of societies. Its authors claimed that “workers did not have a homeland” and that “national differences between people were declining” and communism would exacerbate this decline.

As a matter of fact, the Berlin museum has very aptly chosen the patron for the New Europe we live in. The “freeing” of people from family, from moral and national obligations and nations themselves — these are its ideals and policy. And of course, the “overthrowing of the hitherto social system through violence.” After all, what else is the act of the government taking over the raising of children, including the ability to take them away from their parents, the enforcement of migration and the coercion of states who oppose this policy.

Shortly before his death, John Paul II wrote in his “Ecclesia in Europa” that there was an attempt to “create a vision of Europe which ignores its religious heritage, and in particular, its profound Christian soul, asserting the rights of the peoples who make up Europe without grafting those rights on to the trunk which is enlivened by the sap of Christianity.”

Indeed, Marx is the best patron for this undertaking.

https://rmx.news/poland/germany-celebrates-karl-marx-the-father-of-new-europe/

Some members of the Italian parliament are no longer welcome in parliament because of vaccination requirements.

Italian MPs who are over 50 and who have not been vaccinated three times will not be allowed into the Italian parliament. Italian MP Raphael Raduzzi announced this on Wednesday.

Nowhere else in the Western world is such a measure in force, Raduzzi stressed. “Let everyone know what [Prime Minister] Draghi is doing here.”

In the Netherlands, too, the measure has been met with horror. “Italian MPs, over 50, who are not fully vaccinated, are no longer allowed to enter parliament. They cannot even vote against the decree that establishes this measure. Unprecedented in the Western world,” said former Member of Parliament Henk Krol.

Member of parliament Wybren van Haga added: “Unbelievable.” FVD frontman Thierry Baudet also commented on the total lack of scientific evidence for this extreme measure: “Corona deception.”

At the beginning of this year, the Italian government decided that Corona vaccinations would become mandatory for residents aged 50 and older. The obligation applies until mid-June. The vaccination was already mandatory for teachers and healthcare workers.

“We are intervening especially in age groups most at risk of hospitalisation to reduce the pressure on hospitals and save lives,” Draghi said. Ministers of the right-wing League said there was “no scientific basis” for the measure.

Italian MPs that are over 50 and not triple-vaccinated are no longer allowed into the Parliament. They can't even vote against the decree that established this vulnus. No similar measure has been taken in the western world. RT and let everyone know what Draghi is doing here.
🇮🇹 pic.twitter.com/AbtvAeagAw

— Raphael Raduzzi (@RaphaelRaduzzi) February 16, 2022

https://freewestmedia.com/2022/02/24/italian-parliamentarians-no-longer-welcome-in-parliament-because-of-vaccination-requirement/

Is Essen in danger of becoming a theatre of war between hostile clans?

For decades, Essen has been home to several clans of Lebanese origin. They are the main focus of attention for the police and politicians. But that could change very soon.

Because the Essen police have to prepare for a new clan consisting of Syrians – and it is in rivalry with the Lebanese clans!

Flashback: On April 12, 2021, a group of hooded men beat two men in a Hyundai car with bludgeoning and cutting weapons in the Rüttenscheid district of Essen. Investigators also recovered bullet casings, and the perpetrators fled in a black Porsche Cayenne. Less than 24 hours later, a similar incident occurred in the district of Steele, where again a group attacked a victim and then fled.

A spokesperson for the Essen police also told the newspaper DER WESTEN in April 2021 that it was known that clans were fighting each other and trying to take the law into their own hands. The police spokesperson said at the time: “Unfortunately, these groups tend to bypass the rule of law in order to settle their affairs. Was this the beginning of a war between Lebanese and Syrians?

In Essen, the police have set up the “Special Clan Organisation” (BAO) in order to push back criminal clan branches, especially in the poorer north of the city. The spokesman of the “BAO Clan”, Pascal Schwarz-Pettinato, now tells DER WESTEN: “We observe that the Syrians have grown strongly in number. They clash with rival groups, crimes are committed. For us, it is now a matter of preventing a two-front war.”

Clan and Islamism expert Ahmad A. Omeirate (37) from Berlin emphasises in an interview with DER WESTEN that Essen is “a phenomenon in itself”. There would be a correspondingly large number of Syrians here because of the large number of family reunions. While the Lebanese want to defend their turf, the Syrians are trying to expand their territory. Omeirate: “The Syrians are structurally as far established after just a few years as the Lebanese are after 40 years. The predominant Lebanese are becoming restless, between them and the Syrians there is a collision of worldviews.”

But why this rivalry between Syrians and Lebanese? The expert points to history, explaining: “The Syrian military interventions in the Lebanese civil war, the decades-long occupation of Lebanon and ultimately the assassination of the then Prime Minister Hariri have given rise to aversion against Syrians among Lebanese. Moreover, they feel unequal treatment by politics and the municipality compared to the newcomers.”

In his opinion, the “strategy of 1,000 pinpricks” of North Rhine-Westphalia’s Interior Minister Herbert Reul (69, CDU) is necessary. However, it only combats the symptoms, but not the causes of clan crime, says Omeirate. The expert: “If the situation between the clans escalates and someone feels compelled to do so, there could be the potential for a new brutality, which is not known in Essen in this way.”

https://www.derwesten.de/staedte/essen/clans-essen-news-polizei-krieg-feinde-reul-syrer-libanesen-id234614049.html

https://ok.ru/video/3287594240593

An analysis of health insurance data now underlines the scepticism about the official figures on vaccination side effects. The health insurance company BBK ProVita sounds the alarm in a letter: “It would be ethically wrong not to talk about it”.

By the end of 2021, the Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI) had recorded around 245,000 vaccination side effects. But the actual number of these side effects is probably many times higher. At least, this is what the results of an analysis by the health insurance company BBK ProVita suggest, as reported by the newspaper Die Welt. They had become ” suspicious” when an increasing number of diagnoses suggested a vaccination side effect. Therefore, the databases of all BBK health insurance funds were checked. The data collection paints a completely different picture than the figures from the Ministry of Health.

From January to August 2021, for example, around 217,000 of just under 11 million BBK policyholders had to be treated for vaccination side effects – while the Paul Ehrlich Institute only keeps 244,576 side effect reports based on 61.4 million vaccinated. “According to our calculations, we consider 400,000 visits to the doctor by our insured due to vaccination complications to date to be realistic,” Andreas Schöfbeck, BKK board member, told Die Welt. “Extrapolated to the total population, this figure would be three million.” Thus, the number of vaccination side effects would be more than 1000 per cent higher than the PEI reports.

Schöfbeck mentions the reporting system as the main reason for the massive discrepancy. Doctors often have to report vaccination side effects in their spare time – a time-consuming activity that then remains unpaid. “It is simply impossible to report everything.”

With his analysis, Schöfbeck turned to a wide range of institutions – from the German Medical Association to the StiKo and the Paul Ehrlich Institute itself. He said that the figures were a “strong alarm signal” which “absolutely must be taken into account in the further use of vaccines”.
His figures could be validated by the same data analyses of other health insurance companies, he says. It is “ethically wrong not to talk about it”.

Since ” risk to human life cannot be ruled out”, he set a deadline of 6pm on Tuesday to respond to his letter. As this was not possible, they turned to the public.

https://www.tichyseinblick.de/daili-es-sentials/krankenversicherung-alarm-impfnebenwirkungen/