Control of Ukraine is Crucial to European Strategy but an Invasion isn’t Required to Secure Control
Justin Trudeau accuses Jewish Member of Parliament for Supporting Nazis
COVID was always about control, it was never about the virus
By D. Parker
COVID was always about control, it was never about the virus
Has anyone noticed that the anti-liberty left has lost the plot? Almost everyone knows that Omicron was the natural vaccine that they didn’t have to force down our throats, and yet they act like it never happened. If it weren’t such a dire threat to our freedoms and civil liberties, their destruction and disarray all over the states and the great white North would be incredibly comical. Especially since these are the same folks who deign to inform the rest of us how we should live.
Those of us on the side of freedom tend to forget that the anti-liberty left could never survive if they were honest and forthright in their intentions. You could tell they weren’t concerned about the threat of COVID when they did the worst thing possible in the middle of a pandemic. Opening the border to an illegal invasion from around the world was bad enough, made even worse by distributing potential plague carriers throughout the country.
The “threat to democracy” (aka, the threat to Democrats) in their losing power meant they needed to import new voters. Being very careful to exclude people who know of their socialist national agenda and would never vote for them. In other words, they discouraged Cubans from trying to reach our shores and are deporting Venezuelans fleeing socialism.
We also should know by now that we can’t depend on the corporate media to tell us anything beyond the daily propaganda points. Much less keep us informed on the important matters of the day. Goodness knows they are far too busy chasing the breaking story of a mostly peaceful protest from over a year ago or dredging up nonsensical gossip about hearsay rumors that imply some sort of long-past issue with President Trump.
These days you must look beyond the propaganda pimps to those with a proven track record of citing the primary sources such as Dr. John Campbell with 2.22M subscribers on YouTube. There are of course other sources, but he has been tracking the Omicron variant from its discovery last November. He cited the primary sources in the UK and the states in showing that cases are declining rapidly.
The odd thing is that the anti-liberty left and the legacy media are avoiding this story (pardon the pun) like the plague. From the time that cases started dropping in some locations in January, they’ve had their own media blackout on what was taking place.
The far-left authoritarians in the media and the government (and who can tell the difference these days?) are on autopilot in their bizarro little world where the COVID emergency still rages. An alternative universe where they’ve gone and banished the phase of natural immunity, so they think it doesn’t exist. These are allegedly educated adults acting like children with their hands over their ears screaming so they can’t hear anything about real science and real data.
One explanation for their bizarre behavior could be the bombshell report from Project Veritas with an FDA Executive Officer, Christopher Cole:
You’ll have to get an annual shot [COVID vaccine]. I mean, it hasn’t been formally announced yet ‘cause they don’t want to, like, rile everyone up.
There’s a money incentive for Pfizer and the drug companies to promote additional vaccinations.
It’ll be recurring fountain of revenue. It might not be that much initially, but it’ll be recurring — if they can — if they can get every person required at an annual vaccine, that is a recurring return of money going into their company.
Who doesn’t like it when a far-left business interest colludes with the government to force you to buy their product? As P.J. O’Rourke (1947–2022) RIP once famously said:
If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it’s free.
You aren’t going to get those boosters for free, they are going to cost you a lot more than mere greenbacks, gold coins, silver, or digital dollars (something else our betters would like to shove down our throats). Laura Ingraham made this point the other night, we now have a political movement from the bowels of the nation that has a problem with freedom.
You can always tell when far-left authoritarian fascists have a problem with people demanding liberty and their common-sense civil rights: they start calling them terrorists or other pejoratives. They never address their true grievances because that would show the left as being anti-liberty or anti-freedom. They are as deceitful as the day is long and never complain about putting in overtime for their lies since they always see the ends justifying the means.
Anti-liberty leftists love to lie with language, and that’s the reason we use that term for them. It’s an in-your-face response to their usual exploitation of a positive term. The term’s origins relate to Libertas the female personification of liberty and personal freedom in Roman religion. They’ve played everyone a fool – especially those who are truly liberal – for years now. Ironically, their masks have come off and they have shown themselves as petty tyrants. While they project their rampant fascistic intent on the pro-freedom right.
These are people who make used car salesmen look honest by comparison. Just look at their socialist national agenda and you will know that they could give a demon rat’s behind for progress, democracy, or liberty. Then they will turn around and tell you with a straight face that they are progressive, democratic liberals. Around the farm, we use a few colorful metaphors for that kind of BS – Biden Speak – most of which aren’t proper in polite company.
The good news is that more people are seeing through the lies of the anti-liberty left. That’s all they have in resisting the desire for freedom. They can call ordinary people terrorists all they want, but facts speak for themselves, that’s why their lies are disintegrating and why they are growing more and more desperateto keep a tight grip on our liberty.
German insurers warn about total power blackout
The German Insurance Association (GDV) has warned of the danger of blackouts for Germany and Europe. “Unfortunately, we in Germany are not sufficiently prepared for the consequences of a nationwide power blackout,” according to GDV chief executive Jörg Asmussen. The manufactured crisis in Ukraine is putting huge pressure on Germany to halt Russian gas from NordStream2.
According to dpa, as with the Corona pandemic, the losses in the event of a blackout would be too high for insurers to absorb on their own. “Some consequences of a blackout can be absorbed with the help of insurance, but not all,” Asmussen underscored.
In a previous published statement, GDV had highlighted the dangers of a power supply collapse. “A long-lasting, widespread power blackout is considered by experts to be the worst disaster scenario. More destructive than all natural hazards, more devastating than a pandemic,” it said.
As early as 2011, the Institute for Technology Assessment in Karlsruhe had come to the conclusion that in the event of a nationwide power blackout, “a collapse of the entire society could hardly be prevented”.
In its recent letter, the association quoted a department head at the Federal Office of Civil Protection and Disaster Assistance: “A blackout is currently one of the greatest risks for our country”.
Public transport and retail would come to a standstill, and in the long term the collapse of public order as a whole looms. “The first people die because they can no longer provide for themselves, vital medicines are missing or medical equipment no longer works. Piles of rubbish pile up on the streets and attract rats. Diseases start to spread because people eat spoiled food and drink contaminated water.” Eventually looting and violence follow.
Insurers blasted Germany’s energy transition policy. “In this questionable situation, Germany and Europe are tackling one of the largest infrastructure projects in history: the energy transition. For energy suppliers and grid operators, this means a permanent stress test.”
Rising tensions between the gas supplier Russia and the transit country Ukraine, threatens the security of energy supply in Germany and electricity prices have risen sharply. Power cuts are also becoming more frequent.
https://freewestmedia.com/2022/02/17/german-insurers-warn-about-total-power-blackout/
Germany: Woman bleeds to death after 28 stabbings, but her Afghan husband calls it suicide
The trial of a 38-year-old man who allegedly killed his 23-year-old wife in September last year begins on Tuesday. She bled to death after being stabbed 28 times, but the suspect claims that she committed suicide.
In September last year, a 23-year-old woman was found dead in a refugee accommodation in Ahrensburg. Shortly afterwards, the police arrested her 38-year-old husband as he was about to leave the country. He declared that his wife had executed herself. But the autopsy revealed that she had been killed with several knife wounds. He will go on trial from Tuesday.
The prosecution accuses him of having killed his young wife for base motives. The 23-year-old Afghan woman wanted to separate, but his “excessive possessiveness” had “not allowed her to have a life without him”, according to the prosecution.
The accused had been arrested by police officers of the Federal Police when they routinely checked a tourist bus with destination Milan on the A9 motorway at Münchberg – about 550 km from Ahrensburg – on the night of September 7 at about 1.45 a.m. The accused had been arrested by police officers of the Federal Police. During questioning, he explained to the officers that his wife had killed herself two days earlier in their shared flat in Ahrensburg. He then led her to the flat in question.
The body found there had several stab wounds. A post-mortem examination revealed that the victim had been killed with a total of 28 knife wounds. Cause of death: bleeding to death. An arrest warrant was then issued against the husband on suspicion of manslaughter and the surroundings were examined for traces.
Around 20 riot police from Eutin searched the area and the roofs of the refugee accommodation in Kornkamp. They also investigated the suspected escape route of the perpetrator for evidence and found two mobile phones and a mobile phone case behind the waiting shelter of the railway station in the slope area – presumably they belonged to the victim.
The murder trial against the 38-year-old starts on Tuesday. The court has scheduled eight main trial days and called 29 witnesses and two experts.
French prefect remembers Muslims driving through the streets honking with joy after Father Hamel’s murder
In the trial about the assassination of the priest, Nicole Klein, who was in office at the time of the crime, told her version of events. (…)
The expression is undoubtedly overused, but it was indeed an extraordinary testimony that the jury court heard on Wednesday, the third day of the trial on the assassination in Saint-Étienne-du-Rouvray on July 26, 2016. Nicole Klein, Prefect of the Normandy Region at the time of the crime, took the stand personally and without personal protection at the request of Mgr Lebrun, Archbishop of Rouen and joint plaintiff.
In response to a question from the Advocate General, she explained: “When we learned in the security meeting that the judge was of the opinion that Kermiche was, if I may say so, on the road to recovery, we didn’t believe it for a second.”
(…) Finally, the honorary prefect blurted out: “I also remember the hoots of joy on the evening of the assassination in Saint-Étienne. So few that some say there was no such thing. But, those very few, it was a fact”.(…)Le Figaro
Belgium: Osman Calli, a Turk convicted by the Belgian judiciary of killing four women in one night, “enjoys the beach and the sun at large” in Turkey
Osman Calli, the Turkish-born Ghent resident sentenced to life in prison in 2008 for four counts of murder, two counts of attempted murder, arson, carjacking and hostage-taking, was released in 2020. This was confirmed by the FPS Justice on Monday, confirming a report by HLN. The man had been transferred to Turkey in 2013 to serve the rest of his sentence, but was released there.
“The Belgian authorities have not been formally informed about a possible release,” said Sharon Beavis of the FPS Justice communications department. Osman Calli, on the other hand, has started a new life in Turkey and says today that he “enjoys the Turkish beach and sun” and wants to be “left alone”.
On the night of November 11-12, 2004, Osman Calli had shot his wife Teslime and his sister Hacer in their house in Ghent. He had set the house on fire and then driven to Nieuwerkerken near Aalst, where he broke into the house of Wendy Blendeman, his ex-wife and mother of his eight-year-old son, who lived there with her boyfriend Henri De Cooman and her mother Marie-Louise De Rop. Osman Calli opened fire and shot his ex-wife and her mother. The spouse, who had been hit by a bullet in the chest, had survived. The murderer had then committed carjacking and forced the driver to take him to Ghent. There he forced his way into the house of a man he falsely suspected of adultery with his wife. The latter was injured by a gunshot and has been paralysed ever since.
(…) In their conversation, which was recorded on video, the man who had killed four women declared himself bluntly. “I have fulfilled all my obligations (…) I am a free man, free as a bird. I enjoy the sun, the sea and the beach here. I have started a new life, soon I will be the father of a little boy. Now I want to be left alone,” the man shouted in a video call broadcast on the Flemish channel.7sur7.be
Trudeau’s Justice Minister Says Being “Pro-Trump” is a Factor That will Decide if Your Bank Account is Frozen Under Emergency Orders (VIDEO)
Is the Canadian Government Starting a Civil War? Trudeau to protesters: If you don’t let our government make your health decisions, we’re willing to shoot you
The Premier of Ontario has declared what he calls a “state of emergency” to justify the Canadian government’s removal of the truckers and their trucks from Ottawa.
Others, however, could view his statement to more closely resemble a Declaration of War.
You decide. I urge you to watch the video of the Premier’s statement for yourself.
According to the Premier, each trucker they arrest will face up to one year in prison, have to pay fines up to $100,000 and may likely forfeit their trucks to the Crown!
The Premier’s position is that the truckers protesting Canada’s mandate requiring truckers to be vaccinated have no “right” to block the roads of Ontario.
He does not, however, satisfactorily address the truckers’ other “rights,” like their right to protest wrongful and immoral actions of their government or even to make their own healthcare decisions.
Moreover, the Premier completely overlooks the reality that the Canadian government could alleviate the “emergency” in the blink of an eye, if it were willing to remove its tyrannical mandate dictating that all truck drivers shall either receive a vaccine shot or forfeit their “right” to make a living.
In essence, it appears the government of Canada has chosen to declare war on its own people instead of restoring to its citizens their “unalienable” rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Civil wars — i.e. revolutions – have been started for far lesser reasons.
And for what?
What are Trudeau and his minions thinking? Why are they willing to unleash possibly lethal force to enforce a diktat on unwilling people that, by all reports is, at best, an ineffective medical experiment. As such, their mandate should more likely be found not only immoral, but unlawful. On this point, Trudeau’s government need go no further than a consideration of the moral, ethical and legal predicates underlying the Nuremburg Code that, in reference to medical experimentation on humans — like the Covid vaccinations — provides, in pertinent part: The voluntary consent of the human subject — i.e. each individual trucker — is absolutely essential. (emphasis added)
By contrast, however, what people like Trudeau are telling the people of Canada is: If you don’t let our government make your health decisions, we’re willing to shoot you.
How is that for the good of public health?
That said, please pray for our Canadian brothers and sisters. Tragically — based on the Premier’s statement — it seems highly foreseeable that at least some Canadians are about to suffer harshly for trying to protect their rights… which appears to be what always happens whenever a totalitarian regime is allowed to seize and retain control of any nation.
Of course, the gaping question this leaves for the world to reflect upon yet again is how should the people of any nation be able to define what it is to properly “protest” against the evils of such a regime in defense of one’s unalienable rights?
Specifically, are protests to be constrained only to such actions that the regime exclusively decides are both “lawful” and “peaceful?”
Some would say, it must be both. Otherwise, they say, some Canadians could quickly find themselves being accused of things like treason, insurrection and/or sedition by a “regime” such as Trudeau’s. But, the problem with this is that many laws such a regime may consider “lawful” may not necessarily always be “moral,” which makes a citizen’s opposition even to those laws that are immoral to be unlawful — i.e. to violate even a law considered immoral is still, technically, unlawful
For example, consider our cherished Declaration of Independence here in America. In large part, it was written for the exact purpose of protesting King George’s immoral laws and procedures. However, under the King’s laws on the books in 1776, that Declaration presented the King with nothing less than clear evidence of a criminal conspiracy to commit crimes against the Crown – which, of course, made the proclamations of our founding fathers “unlawful.” At a minimum, this requires one to conclude that our founding fathers at some point must have decided that trying to remain “lawful” in the course of protesting an evil regime is most assuredly not always possible. That is, if those protesting the laws issued by the Crown ever hope to succeed.
Logic and reason also present similar problems with respect to the concept of protestors only having recourse to “peaceful” means when attempting to resist the evil of a tyrannical regime.
If tyrannies throughout history have proven anything, it is that sometimes to achieve success, actions must be taken by those on the side of “good” that necessarily must often fall far short of what may be considered “peaceful.” For instance, consider World War II. To successfully protest the evils of Hitler’s Nazi regime required actions to be taken by U.S. forces that were about as “peaceful” as those that were taken by George Washington to successfully protest the evils practices of the British Crown. Clearly, neither of these stands taken by Americans to “protest” the evil of their day were remotely even “mostly peaceful.” Yet, both are undeniable instances where violence was absolutely necessary and appropriate to defeat the evils presented at those moments in our nation’s history.
Which, of course, then leaves us with the question of whether the rights of the Canadian truckers that are presently at stake are of such fundamental importance that the merits of the protest warrant an escalation to acts of resistance that are either or both unlawful or unpeaceful?
No doubt, most of us would sincerely hope to conclude they are not yet at that place. And, in fact, anyone with any sanity would most certainly want to cling to the hope as long as possible that they never will be drawn to such a place where bloodshed results almost invariably.
Nor is this analysis of the Ontario Premier’s state of emergency a call for such a civil war – or, if you prefer, revolution — to transpire in Canada!
But, with that said, it is equally important to note, that’s not to say by this discourse that such a civil war in Canada’s immediate future is not possible.
The truth is somewhere in between – consequent to the Ontario Premier’s declaration this week, some form of civil war in Canada seems far more likely to happen – and now even more foreseeable — in the days to come than appeared to be the case even the day before the Premier of Ontario issued his government’s threat to the truckers. And, for all concerned, that trend is not a good thing.
https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2022/02/canadian-government-starting-civil-war-cliff-n/