Allah's Willing Executioners

Behind Ibram X. Kendi’s racist tract, How to Be an Antiracist, is a German publishing giant with a Nazi past. Kendi’s books have been published by Penguin Random House, which after a merger overseen by Bertelsmann executive Markus Dohle, and despite antitrust challenges from the Justice Department, became the world’s largest publisher under CEO Dohle.

Bertelsmann, the German mega-publisher, whose owner had donated to the SS, which, employed Jewish slave labor, and long before Kendi, was infamous for racist tracts such as The Christmas Book of the Hitler Youth, is heavily invested in pushing racism on Americans.

And schools are a lucrative market for inflicting critical race theory on American students.

Now Dohle, in a New York Times story that suspiciously reads like a press release, has announced that he’s donating $500,000 to PEN to create the “Dohle Book Defense Fund”.

The fund by the wealthy German CEO appears to be meant to fight efforts by states, schools, and parents to keep racist hate out of the classroom like the kind purveyed by Bertelsmann which went from the The Christmas Book of the Hitler Youth to How to Be an Antiracist.

The New York Times connects efforts by parents “demanding the removal of certain books from schools” and local legislators working to keep “gender identity”, “pornographic material” and “critical race theory” out of the classrooms to Dohle growing up in Germany after WW2.

Dohle claims to be aware of “the dark times and the dark history of the country” in his native Germany, as if parents fighting to keep racist books out of classrooms makes them Nazis.

Parents already struggling with the disproportionate power of the Biden White House, which attempted to treat them as terrorists, and the smears of the media, will now also have to contend with the world’s largest publisher coming after them in order to protect its profit margins.

Dohle’s move however casts light on the role of Penguin Random House and the former Nazi megapublisher behind it in the war over critical race theory in America. None of the media stories about the Dohle Book Defense Fund bother to mention Kendi or the financial stake that the former Nazi book publisher has in forcing American schools to keep buying its racist hate.

Penguin Random House has aggressively marketed Ibram X. Kendi’s brand of hate to adults and even to children with the widely mocked Antiracist Baby, a board book for babies, and Goodnight Racism, which does for Goodnight Moon what Farrakhan did for bow ties.

(There’s even a card game: The Antiracist Deck. Whatever card you pick, you lose.)

Penguin Random House’s education arm however also pushes Kendi’s How To Be an Antiracist to high school students grades 9 to 12. Kendi’s Be Antiracist is targeted at grades 6-12.

It’s not just Kendi.

Robin DiAngelo’s racist White Fragility is being distributed by Penguin Random House which promotes it for grades 6 to 12. Her latest, Nice White People, is designated for grades 9 to 12.

Ta-Nehisi Coates’s Between the World and Me is promoted for grades 9 to 12. There’s also the latest Coates book being adapted for young adults, The Beautiful Struggle (likely to be translated as Der Schone Kampf in German if Bertelsmann ever gets around to it.)

After all, Bertelsmann had only agreed to stop selling Mein Kampf in 1999.

It’s no coincidence that three of the most infamous racialist authors who, more than anyone, have helped mainstream racism, and have become the public face of the ideas inherent in critical race theory, are on the list of one single publisher. Or that the publisher’s CEO is now going to war against parents trying to keep Bertelsmann’s brand of racism out of their schools.

Previously few conservatives were willing to connect the dots to Penguin Random House.

But Markus Dohle’s declaration of war on American parents and conservatives may change that. The Dohle Book Defense Fund is not defending books, it’s defending the cash that Dohle’s company makes from hooking American kids on hate. PEN, which has failed to advocate for conservative writers being canceled left and right, is thrilled to act as a front for the financial interests of one of the megapublishers destroying the industry. It probably helps that Dohle sits on PEN’s Board of Trustees and has served as the Board’s executive vice-president.

(If you wonder why PEN won’t actually protect writers, read that last sentence one more time.)

American publishing has been carved up by foreign interests like Germany’s Bertelsmann and France’s Lagardère Group (publishers of In Defense of Looting) which have not only destroyed longtime American publishing firms like Random House and Little, Brown, and Company, but turned them into machines feeding hate, violence, and the breakdown of American society.

In the media’s press releases, Dohle neglected to mention his company’s financial interests, and instead claimed that he decided to invest at least $500,000 into fighting American parents because of “the future of our democracy.” Nothing says “democracy” like a German CEO using the world’s largest publisher and rivers of cash to bully American parents into backing down.

But as Dohle and Bertelsmann go to war to protect their racist business model, they may experience more of that “democracy” than they expect. It took a long time to wake up conservatives to the dangerous threat of monopolistic Big Tech companies. Dohle and Bertelsmann may be about to wake the same sleeping giant as Bezos and Zuckerberg.

Penguin Random House under Dohle signed a $65 million deal with the Obamas, and a $20 million deal with Prince Harry. Cuomo’s shady $5 million book deal came through Crown: an imprint of Penguin Random House. Hillary’s book deals came through Simon & Schuster which is set to be swallowed up by Bertelsmann extinguishing one of the last large U.S. publishers.

The Justice Department is fighting to block this latest Bertelsmann cannibalization of America’s publishing industry, but considering how many politicians have made millions from book deals through the German giant, the odds may not be on the side of justice.

If you follow the big book deals of politicians and the big racist book deals, they tend to lead to the same German company which is destroying our society and our culture for its profit.

Dohle and Bertelsmann could have been satisfied wielding their power from behind the scenes. Now they have declared war on American conservatives and parents, and that will raise questions about whether not only Kendi, Coates or DiAngelo’s racist tracts belong in our schools, but whether any Bertelsmann and Penguin Random House books do.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2022/02/german-ceo-behind-kendi-and-diangelo-funds-daniel-greenfield/

More than half of the 14 to 35 year olds are fed up with gender and annoyed by it. 

According to a study by the market research institute Rheingold, many in the younger generation do not know what gender policy is supposed to serve at all.

The rejection of gendering among the interviewees is also due to the fact that it causes a “linguistic stumbling block”. “You can no longer concentrate on what you actually want to talk about.”

Only 33 percent believe that it should help to include some people who do not define themselves as male or female, while 36 percent believed that gender focus could make women more visible.

Young women pushed the issue of gender the most. Young men, on the other hand, rejected gender focus because this also includes discriminating against males. “Officially gender is used as a sign of modernity,” study director Judith Barbolini warned.  But in private, it is not a focus because it would lead to trouble, she said.

For the survey, the institute interviewed 2000 adolescents and young adults. The study also found that 27 percent of the participants did not identify as male or female.

Older surveys had already shown that a majority of Germans reject gender language . Even among supporters of the Greens, only a minority wants to push through genderless speech.

Despite this, more and more German cities are using so-called “gender-equitable language” in their administration. The University of Kassel recently hit the headlines because a student there had to accept deduction of points for his examination paper because he had not gendered his work “correctly”.

https://freewestmedia.com/2022/02/18/majority-of-young-germans-annoyed-by-gender-politics/

🔴 Mois de la femme : la ville de #Nantes met en avant une femme voilée, puis retire l’affiche en catastrophe. Promouvoir le voile est une faute politique, une atteinte à la laïcité. Merci aux lanceurs d’alerte ! Pas un € d’argent public ne doit servir le communautarisme. pic.twitter.com/3eoL3U63yp

— Laurence Garnier ن (@LGarnier44) February 17, 2022

It was an advertisement that did not go unnoticed. In Nantes, an imposing poster depicting a veiled woman celebrating Women’s Month caused a controversy. As 20 Minutes reports, the Islamic veil, which is supposed to represent the “faces of Nantes women” and is displayed next to the logo of the socialist city, disturbed members of parliament and citizens. “Promoting the veil is a political mistake, an attack on secularism,” complained in particular Laurence Garnier, the LR leader of the opposition in Nantes. The Women’s Month project initiated by “Visages des Nantaises” would have proposed a photo exhibition in which 50 female residents of the city would speak out in defence of women’s rights. However, the project, which had requested financial support, would not have been accepted by the city of Nantes, according to first deputy Bassem Asseh.

As for the poster itself, it was quickly removed by the municipality after the controversy over the veiled woman escalated. According to the city, the poster was the result of an “internal error of a technical nature”. Bassem Asseh defended himself: “Until we better understand how this mistake could have happened, we don’t have to listen to any lectures on secularism, and certainly not from MPs who supported Manif pour tous”.

https://www.valeursactuelles.com/regions/pays-de-la-loire/loire-atlantique/nantes/societe/la-ville-de-nantes-affiche-une-femme-voilee-pour-celebrer-le-mois-de-la-femme/

He stabbed travellers with a knife, chased a man through Dresden’s main railway station. But an expert opinion does not consider Milad A. (24) is not a terrorist.

The Afghan had randomly attacked a group of travellers in the main station on the evening of August 13, 2021.

He kicked the first of the three Uzbeks off the bench, the second he attacked with a kitchen knife (9 cm blade) and injured his hand. According to the indictment, he shouted “Allahu Akbar” (God is great).

He chased the third man through the station – stabbing him nine times and injuring his arm and hip.

Only federal police officers were able to overpower him with a drawn weapon.

On Monday, the Afghan made a confession before the district court – but claims not to remember anything: “I drugged myself with Crystal an hour before, I was just scared,” he said during the trial.

According to an Islamic expert opinion of the State Office of Criminal Investigation, there are no indications of extremism in his case.

However, Milad A. has already stabbed once in the train station. As the newspaper BILD learned, three years ago he was sentenced to 16 months probation for a knife attack, among other things.

“Probation is out of the question,” the judge let slip yesterday. He is facing years in prison for dangerous bodily harm and threatening behaviour. The trial will be continued.

https://www.bild.de/regional/dresden/dresden-aktuell/dresden-messerstecher-kann-sich-angeblich-an-nichts-erinnern-79150284.bild.html###wt_ref=https:/m.bild.de/&wt_t=1645186401354

by Giulio Meotti

“Why should we only target Islamism, when we should be interested in the Society of Saint Pius X and the zealots of Hare Krishna? Because you have to be seriously radicalized to walk the streets of Paris in the middle of winter, with a shaved head, wearing a saffron-colored sari, playing the tambourine and chanting mantras … “. This question and answer, with no little irony, is the opening of “Sept pas vers l’enfer” by Alain Chouet, the former number two of the DGSE, the very powerful French counter-intelligence service.

The book is a deadly indictment of the suicide of the European elites.

“Western elites and media thought they had detected the joys of a democratic transition in Arab and Muslim countries under the leadership of the Muslim Brotherhood perceived as a kind of local Christian Democrat. On this ideological basis, all American and European strategies were built in the first two decades of the 21st century, culminating in support for the Arab ‘springs’.” But these short-sighted interferences quickly turned into wide open doors to the only political organizations that survived the dictatorial powers, “the Salafist organizations that had benefited for decades from the protection and support of the petromonarchies.”

Chouet attacks “a certain intelligentsia” that has brandished accusations of “racism and Islamophobia” to end the debate. “All ill-thinkers have been designated to the revenge of the mainstream press and the hateful contempt of editorial writers. And we found our usual white-shirted philosopher haranguing the streets of Tripoli alongside the president of a transitional government who proudly wore his zebiba (the bump of prayer on the forehead of devout Muslims) while promising bright and fabulous tomorrows. oil contracts to his French friend “. Here Chouet attacks the philosopher Bernard-Henri Lévy and Nicholas Sarkozy, who threw Libya to the wolves, for intellectual naivety and economic interests.

Former spy Chouet recounts incredible incidents. “I have been invited every year to give a lecture on the problems of the Arab world in Molenbeek, a suburb of Brussels by now known as it has become the model of a neighborhood consigned to the control and activism of the Salafist jihadists. One day I was there to discuss issues with Firouzeh Nahavandy, a professor at the Free University of Brussels.”

“We had just started talking when Philippe Moureaux, the city’s socialist mayor and big shot of the Belgian Socialist Party, took the front row flanked by two imposing bodyguards in djellaba, beards and white berets. To the audience, Moureaux said I was not qualified to discuss the Arab world, as I came from a country that had tortured Muslims in Algeria. His reasoning is significant to understand the way in which, since the late 1980s, the European left has allowed itself to be taken by the sirens of militant Salafism. The management of Molenbeek is exemplary in this sense: authorizations granted easily and without any control for the opening and functioning of mosques, Islamic private schools, cultural and sports clubs generously subsidized by Saudi Arabia “.

Following the tragic fire at the Innovation department store that killed 300 people in Brussels in 1967, Saudi King Faisal, then on tour in Europe, pulled out his checkbook to compensate the victims. “In return, the Saudi king asked the Belgian king Baudouin to grant Arabia the monopoly of the representation of Islam and the appointment of imams in Belgium”. The Belgian government officially recognized the Islamic religion. It was the first European country.

And then there was the inclusion of the Islamic religion in the school curriculum. “I accuse political leaders of never wanting to understand the rise of radical Islam and of deliberately ignoring it because of the electorate and wanting to be ‘politically correct'” writes Chouet. “I accuse them of allowing several municipalities to develop jihadist radicalism for years, to the point that a socialist official told me: ‘We know Molenbeek’s problem, but, what do you want, it is an electorate that cannot be neglected'”.

The instigators of terrorism exist. “But there is no need to look for them in some remote corner of Syria, Afghanistan or Yemen. They are legion. They are all those who for thirty years have been calling for revolt and violence against the West and the ‘unbelievers’.”

Under the two crossed sabers of the Muslim Brotherhood coat of arms there is a word in Arabic that can be translated as follows: ‘Be ready!’ “.

Europe is certainly not …

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/322464

On February 12, a Swedish reporter Christian Peterson published a video on Twitter, where during a visit to The Gambia he unexpectedly encounters the Left Party’s legal policy spokesperson Linda Snecker, a politician who has not infrequently had angry outbursts against white men.

The 39-year-old politician has attracted attention for her attacks on white men as well as for her proposals to impose harsh penalties on white men who buy sex from women. At first she appears quite friendly, but when she is asked what she has been doing in The Gambia and if it feels good to be far away from white men, she is clearly bothered and asks Peterson to “fly back home”.

Min goda vän @lindasnecker hatar ju vita män så det är kanske därför hon är i Afrika… pic.twitter.com/unwrR7VlBo

— Christian (@AssarChristian) February 12, 2022

For just over a week, Christian Peterson, a reporter for the Swedish channel Exakt24, has been in the African country to prepare reports and news items, including about the extensive sex tourism in the country involving white women. Unlike in Thailand, for example, where young teenage girls or boys are often exploited, The Gambia has for decades become a paradise for older, white women who buy sex from young, black men for a fee. The sex trade involving white men is condemned collectively across the political spectrum, while white women are somehow excused.

In fact, sex tourism practiced by affluent, older, white women has often been portrayed as “sexual liberation”. Among other things, the Swedish author Kerstin Thorvall, who died several years ago, has written romanticized travelogues of how she has traveled to The Gambia, among other places, to be satisfied by black men, where white men, on the other hand, have been portrayed as boring. In general, female sex tourism to Africa has not been condemned to be nearly as severe as that practiced by men who travel to Brazil, among other places.

Like Thailand and Brazil, the predominantly Muslim The Gambia has a reputation for sex tourism. It is quite common to see older European women hanging onto Gambian men half their age on the infamous Senegambia strip. Prostitution and paedophilia are illegal in Gambia, but not one tourist has been prosecuted for it, Njundu Drammeh, the national coordinator at The Gambia’s Child Protection Alliance told AFP.

“They visit every year and they look after us,” one young black male prostitute told The Telegraph. His white “girlfriends” send him money throughout the year. And the parents of young children who become ensnared in the sex trade of minors, are only too happy to receive a “sponsorship”. Sex tourism from rich the UK, Netherlands and Scandinavia had contributed to around 16 percent of GDP in 2014 already.

In researching female sex tourism, Christian Peterson from Exakt24 had traveled to The Gambia. On February 12, he came across a somewhat unexpected visitor to the country, namely Linda Snecker, the Left Party’s legal policy spokesperson.

Snecker has often spoken out in favor of increasing the penalties for buying sex, and also for criminalizing sex purchases made abroad. At the same time, she has made statements suggesting that some criminals do not become less criminal by being in prison. Snecker’s comments have primarily been aimed at white men, or rather white men who buy sex, both at home and abroad.

When Christian Peterson came across Snecker, she was clearly surprised, but at first unaware that she had come face to face with an intrepid reporter.

When Peterson interviewed Snecker, she claimed that she and some other left-wing parties had been visiting the country, partly to meet political representatives, and also to take a short holiday.

“And you are here filming…?” Linda Snecker wanted to know. At first she does not realise that she is face to face with a reporter from Exakt24, and she continues to ask Christian Peterson about how exactly he knows her. Peterson then says that he has seen her from time to time on the news and on Twitter.

However, the next question posed to Linda Snecker about the reason for her being in the mecca for sex tourists, elicits a strong reaction: “You tend to make rather negative comments about white men. Is that why you’re in The Gambia, because you don’t have to deal with white men?” the reporter wanted to know.

Then Linda Snecker’s smile stiffens, and she blushes: “Please, dear. Fly back. Fly back where you came from.”

The female politician then quickly turns her back to the camera and marches away with brisk but firm steps, noticeably embarrassed.

https://freewestmedia.com/2022/02/17/left-wing-swedish-politician-surprised-by-sex-tourism-reporter-in-gambia/

Dave Rubin discusses Justin Trudeau’s unearthed comments on Chinese dictatorship in light of Trudeau’s recent crackdown on protesters.