‘Madman Putin’: The Globalists’ Misinformation Play

By Vasko Kohlmayer

Ever since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the western public has been carpet bombed with the claim that Russian president Vladimir Putin is some sort of unhinged madman. This notion is being feverishly spread by the establishment and those in its pay: the political class, the media and the commentariat, career diplomats and technocrats as well as those connected to the security and intelligence communities.

The most remarkable thing about the Mad Vlad claim is that it is obviously false.

Whatever Vladimir Putin may be, he is certainly no irrational madman. This much should be obvious to everyone with the eyes to see.

A former KGB operative, Vladimir Putin is a willy person of demonstrated ability. After all, he managed to bring control and order to a vast country which was largely in disarray when he took it over at the age of 48. He adroitly managed to keep himself in power for over two decades while navigating and overcoming a number of crises and challenges along the way. Through it all, he has shown himself to be intelligent, steel-willed, calculating, shrewd, self-controlled, determined, cunning and patient.

These are hardly the qualities of a lunatic.

We have dealt with Putin for 22 years and during that whole time no one seriously suggested or maintained that he was crazy. Quite to the contrary, for almost a decade after his ascent he was viewed as a capable man of considerable talents.

For years the Western establishment considered Putin a “man with whom we could do business.” He was seen as “liberal, humane, and decent European.” He was described as a person of “’alert, controlled poise’ and ‘well-briefed acuity,’ who was open to anything, even Russia joining NATO.”

And yet less than a week ago, on the day he invaded Ukraine, Vladimir Putin was nearly unanimously declared – contrary to all evidence – a “madman” by members of the Western establishment.

The question is this: Why did they decide to suddenly gaslight and brainwash people with such a patent lie that so obviously contravenes reality?

They did this to hide and conceal the gargantuan blunder they have committed over Ukraine.

By convincing the public that Putin is a madman, they can portray his move on Ukraine as an irrational, unexpected, impulsive and unjustifiable act of an unbalanced mind.

Nothing could be further from the truth. Putin’s move was not irrational, impulsive or unjustifiable. And it was certainly not unexpected.

For years Putin had warned that inclusion of Ukraine in NATO was a red line for Russia. It should not be difficult to understand his position. It is not unreasonable for Russia to object to the presence of what it perceives to be a hostile military alliance on its border with a country that has historically been either part of Russia or within its sphere of influence. Russia does not want to allow such a threat to its security for similar reasons the United States would not allow Russia to build a military base in Cuba.

In their drive to implement a New World Order, however, Western globalists have been dismissive of Russia’s security concerns. Russia continued its strenuous objections and warned that if they were not taken seriously, they would take the necessary action to keep Ukraine out of NATO. The last time Russia made this clear was in November of last year.

This is how Wikipedia describes this occasion:

“On 30 November 2021, Russian President Vladimir Putin stated that an expansion of NATO’s presence in Ukraine, especially the deployment of any long-range missiles capable of striking Russian cities or missile defence systems similar to those in Romania and Poland, would be a “red line” issue for Russia. Putin asked U.S. President Joe Biden for legal guarantees that NATO would not expand eastward or put “weapons systems that threaten us in close vicinity to Russian territory.”

Do you want to know what kind of response Putin received to his legitimate security concerns? It was given by NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg. This is what he told Putin:

“It’s only Ukraine and 30 NATO allies that decide when Ukraine is ready to join NATO. Russia has no veto, Russia has no say, and Russia has no right to establish a sphere of influence to try to control their neighbors.”

Do you get the insult and the humiliation of this response? Not only the pompous globalist Stoltenberg refused to address Russia security fears, he implied that pip-squeak countries like North Macedonia, Portugal – who happened to be members of NATO – have a greater say than Russia in whether a large country on its border joins the alliance.

Having ridden roughshod over their populations for nearly two years with their lockdown and vaccine regime, the Western globalists grew arrogant, overbearing and overconfident. They lost touch with reality and assumed that everyone would submit to their chicanery in the same way that their own docile populations went along with their random edicts and mandates.

Putin, however, would not bend to the globalist chicanery and did exactly what he had kept warning about for years if Russian concerns were not adequately addressed: He invaded Ukraine to stop NATO’s expansion into the country with which he shares nearly 1000 kilometers of border, and which once hosted Russia’s capital.

The invasion of Ukraine was a pre-announced, rational act of a strongman who felt increasingly encircled and threatened by what he deems to be an antagonistic military block.

Putin’s move came as a great shock to the Western elites who could have not imagined someone standing up to them in such a bold way. They were completely unprepared for the obvious and went into panic mode as they realized how many innocent lives could be lost to their incompetence and pomposity.

As the Russian tanks rolled into Ukraine, Putin exposed the globalists’ hubris and ineptitude. As the Russian military advanced speedily through the vast expanses of that land, the shocked elitists were nowhere to be seen. It was only the heart-breaking bravery of the Ukrainian people that saved them from complete exposure and humiliation.

And it is at this junction that their patently absurd “Putin is a madman” misinformation play comes in.

The “Putin is a madman” canard is meant to shift the blame in the eyes of the public for the Ukrainian tragedy on the allegedly irrational act of a “crazy” man rather than assigning it to the right people: the overbearing, domineering, arrogant Western globalists who treated the legitimate security concerns of a great nuclear power with contempt.

In Putin they encountered reality in the form of a willy and cunning strongman who would not yield to their edicts and hollow pronouncements in the submissive way they were used to from their own badgered populations.

They were in for a rude awakening. For two years the pompous globalists had been enriching themselves while tormenting peoples of the world with their useless and destructive lockdowns and dangerous and largely ineffective injections. If you think this is a harsh exaggeration, please read this from Yahoo News:

“Lockdowns during the first COVID-19 wave in the spring of 2020 only reduced COVID-19 mortality by 0.2% in the U.S. and Europe, according to a Johns Hopkins University meta-analysis of several studies. “While this meta-analysis concludes that lockdowns have had little to no public health effects, they have imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted,” the researchers wrote. “In consequence, lockdown policies are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument.” The researchers – Johns Hopkins University economics professor Steve Hanke, Lund University economics professor Lars Jonung, and special advisor at Copenhagen’s Center for Political Studies Jonas Herby – analyzed the effects of lockdown measures such as school shutdowns, business closures, and mask mandates on COVID-19 deaths.”

While the people suffered under their nonsensical edicts, the globalists kept accumulating untold riches. Consider this headline from CNN: “As millions fell into poverty during the pandemic, billionaires’ wealth soared.”

Greedy for ever more money, the globalists sought to pull Ukraine into their World Order so they could suck out money from it to line up their own pockets even further. They have been shown the way by none other than Globalist-in-Chief Joe Biden whose family has already siphoned millions of dollars out of Ukraine through his son Hunter. It is fully in character that Biden is also a Covidista par excellence who forced millions of unwilling Americans to take the Covid injections by pressuring employers to institute illegal mandates.

Now the globalists’ arrogance and ruthlessness got us into the Ukrainian crisis where we potentially face the threat of nuclear war.

The clever guys that they always are, these wreckers have already managed to blame it all on the Mad Vlad.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/03/madman_putin_the_globalists_misinformation_play.html

1 in 4 prisoners in France are foreign nationals, costing taxpayers €700 million a year

The cost to the French taxpayer to accommodate foreign national convicts in France’s penitentiary system is approximately €700 million each year, according to government data and media reports.

Statistics published in October of last year revealed that 17,198 foreign nationals were incarcerated in French prisons, approximately 25 percent of the total prison population and a figure which has soared from 17.2 percent in 2011.

The constantly rising tally has increased the burden on the budget of the penitentiary system and as a result, on the French taxpayer. With Le Figaro reporting the average cost of incarcerating a prisoner in France as being €110 per day — taking into account meals, water, heating and staffing costs — the total cost of housing the foreign prisoners now exceeds €700 million per year.

Among the foreign nationals most present in French prisons, approximately 56 percent originate from Africa — 3,472 come from Algeria; 2,220 from Morocco; 1,117 from Tunisia; and 2,984 coming from the remaining African nations. In contrast, 5,109 come from other nations across Europe; 1,308 originate from the Americas, predominantly from Middle and South America; and 880 come from Asia.

A source at the French Prison Service revealed to Le Figaro that only a handful of these foreign detainees are ultimately repatriated to their country of origin, saying, “About 15 at the most per year. […] It is mainly about arrest warrants. It is regrettable because it allows these criminals to have a clean record at home.”

However, the vast majority of these detainees of foreign nationality are subject to an obligation to leave French territory, thus excluding de facto sentence adjustments and reintegration programs. Once their sentence has been served, these prisoners are sent to an “administrative detention center,” before eventually being released back into society. If legal repatriation mechanisms exist, their implementation is lengthy due to the overload of the courts.

France has a notoriously bad track record of deporting illegal migrants. For example, French President Emmanul Macron made it his goal to achieve a 100 percent deportation rate, but only has managed to achieve a 15 percent rate.   

https://rmx.news/article/1-in-4-prisoners-in-france-are-foreign-nationals-costing-taxpayers-e700-million-a-year/

Biden: “Putin May Circle Kiev with Tanks, But He’ll Never Gain the Hearts and Souls of the Iranian People” (VIDEO)

“A communitarian justice”: Around 30 French lawyers oppose the wearing of the Islamic headscarf in their profession

In an article published in the Marianne newspaper on Monday February 28, about thirty lawyers – whose names can be found in the articles of this magazine – have spoken out against the possibility of wearing a headscarf in their profession. With this statement, initiated by Lara Fatimi, a lawyer at the Paris Bar Association, they reject the creation of a “communitarian justice”. “The recent attempt to impose the wearing of the headscarf at the lawyers’ college reveals the assumed Islamist proselytising zeal of certain religious communities within the judiciary,” the judges and prosecutors declare in the preamble.

In the same column published in the weekly magazine, the lawyers highlight that “more and more incidents are occurring, unacceptable breaches that are damaging our profession and our republican justice”. These incidents are currently being witnessed ” within the school desks of future lawyers “. However, the signatories fear that clerks, judges and prosecutors will also be affected in the future.

In view of the dangerous increase of religious activities in our ranks”, the lawyers said, they wanted to speak out “before it is too late”. The judges, who describe themselves as the “last bulwarks of freedom”, state that they cannot resign themselves to “allowing the rise of religious militancy to harm our profession and ultimately the citizens”.

The thirty lawyers argued in Marianne that wearing the headscarf in their institution would mean “accepting that religion takes precedence over the work of justice. We cannot allow such a symbol,” they added. Shortly after, they substantiate their position as follows: “Only the wearing of a robe should prevail as a symbol of authority, neutrality and dignity of justice common to the people in the courtroom. Only the wearing of the robe guarantees the unity of all servants of the judiciary. Only the wearing of the robe makes us a unity that transcends borders”.

Secondly, these ” strictly independent ” judges consider that the wearing of a religious sign ” is a manifestation of dependence “. Since it is not only the independence of the judiciary that is at stake, but also the independence of their profession, the lawyers demand that “a judiciary be maintained that guarantees everyone the possibility of being tried in a space protected from religious intrusion”. In conclusion, “We lawyers do not want a communitarian [and] obscurantist justice system. We lawyers do not want a justice that veils itself”.

https://www.valeursactuelles.com/societe/une-justice-communautariste-une-trentaine-davocats-sopposent-au-port-du-voile-dans-leur-profession/

Senegal: The Church denounces the “contempt for humanity” of an imam for whom there are only two religions, “Islam and the infidels”

The Catholic Church in Senegal on Tuesday March 1 condemned the “contempt” of an imam for what it considered offensive remarks he made to the Christian community and called on him to apologise on the television station where he had made the remarks.

Imam Serigne Lamine Sall was a guest on the local television station Walf TV on Thursday, where he claimed, among other things, that Catholics in Islam were “to be condemned in the same way” as the Freemasons and the Jews. In his opinion, there are only two religions, “Islam and the infidels”. The imam’s remarks were “unacceptable and can only be justified by disrespect, tactlessness and ignorance”, said Philippe Abraham Birane Tine, the president of the National Council for Secularism, which gathers the country’s Catholic associations and movements, at a press conference in the archdiocese of Dakar on Tuesday.

These remarks triggered a fierce polemic in Senegal, a West African country known for its greater open-mindedness and whose population is almost 95% Muslim. Mame Mactar Guèye, vice-president of Jamra, an Islamic NGO, told a radio station that “Imam Serigne Lamine Sall could have done without these unfortunate remarks against the Christian community. This is (one) word too much.” […]Le Figaro

https://www.fdesouche.com/2022/03/01/senegal-leglise-denonce-le-mepris-dun-imam-pour-qui-il-ny-a-que-deux-religions-lislam-et-les-mecreants/

mRNA shots raise the risk of Covid infection in children under 12

Six weeks after becoming “fully vaccinated,” kids under 12 are 40 percent MORE likely to be infected Covid than those who never received mRNA shots, a huge New York state database shows.

The mRNA jabs provide some protection for the first two weeks of “full vaccination.” But it declines rapidly, turns negative by the fifth week, and more sharply negative in the sixth.

“Negative” vaccine efficacy means that vaccinated people are more likely to become infected. It is not clear how high the increased risk may become for young children, since the database only covered six weeks and the trend worsened each week.

The blue bar in the chart below shows the relative odds of unvaccinated and vaccinated children to get Covid. The dashed red line equals a risk ratio of 1 – a 50/50 risk.

See how the blue bar falls each week and drops below the red line after 35 days? At point, unvaccinated children have lower risk. (The orange bar is kids 12-17. They still have some protection six weeks out, although it too is declining.)

The study covered the period from mid-December through the end of January, when the Omicron variant became predominant. Although many other studies have shown the vaccines are largely useless against Omicron infection in adults after four months, this database makes clear they are even more useless even more quickly for children.

Children 5 to 11 receive a smaller mRNA dose than adolescents and adults, 10 micrograms versus 30 for each shot. It is not clear whether the smaller dose is the reason the shots are even less effective in kids than in adults, or whether children’s immune systems react differently to mRNA at any dose.

Vaccine protection against Covid hospitalization in children under 12 also dropped over time. By the final two weeks of the study, vaccines offered no statistically significant protection against hospitalizations from Covid, though the numbers were very small.

The database covered 365,000 vaccinated children in New York state aged 5-11. The researchers did not mention the negative effectiveness in their discussion of their findings.

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/resending-urgent-mrna-shots-raise/comments?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo0ODAyMDAwOSwicG9zdF9pZCI6NDk1MTM5OTAsIl8iOiJVaDR1cSIsImlhdCI6MTY0NjE0MjcyMiwiZXhwIjoxNjQ2MTQ2MzIyLCJpc3MiOiJwdWItMzYzMDgwIiwic3ViIjoicG9zdC1yZWFjdGlvbiJ9.S8iY7WC2Hguoz81X6rpcSb6mwaLmgwQuxkr-0kXTh5g&utm_source=url / https://vladtepesblog.com/