The insanity surrounding the prosecution of three exiled Iranians by the Hamburg public prosecutor’s office shows how far Islamisation has progressed in Germany’s judiciary and how the political desire to make it as acceptable as possible for the ‘religion of peace’ in this country on its inexorable path towards a Sharia caliphate is now being put into practice. They had demonstrated in front of the Islamic Centre Hamburg (IZH) against the mullah regime and its agents in Germany, burning pages of the Quran in the process. The Iranian Consulate General then called on the Hamburg Senate to take legal action. The left-wing appeasement policy of the Hanseatic city immediately complied – and used the case not to clearly side with freedom-loving opponents of the regime and opponents of Islamic fascism, but to do the will of Tehran.
The authority, which is bound by instructions, is now accusing the three Iranian dissidents of ‘joint insulting of religious beliefs’ because of the protest action, which took place on the 6th of August 2022. As reported by the newspaper ‘Welt’, the defendants will shortly have to answer to the Hamburg-St. Georg district court. There is no doubt that the complainant IZH has always been an outpost of the Iranian regime in Germany, which was warned of as an ‘important propaganda instrument of the Islamic Republic of Iran’ more than 30 years ago by the (then still neutral) Office for the Protection of the Constitution. After evidence of terror support from IZH clerics and propaganda incitement emerged, Federal Minister of the Interior Nancy Faeser reluctantly banned the organisation in July. The ban had long been called for by the same Iranian regime critics who are now being prosecuted by the Hamburg judiciary – because they were ultimately denouncing precisely what the overdue ban on the IZH had been directed against.
Even more perverse: the people accused by the public prosecutor’s office also include the mullah-critical activist Jasmin Maleki, who has already demonstrated against the Ayatollah’s oppressive state in Iran at the risk of her life and had to flee there in 2016. However, she did not tear up or burn a Quran – ‘but gave a speech that was critical of Islam and pro-feminism’, as the 35-year-old claims and as can be seen on the video evidence from a group of activists. Although she did exactly what is a constitutional right in the free West and especially in Germany, which is the main difference to the terrorist state of Iran, Maleki is now being persecuted by a politically and religiously indoctrinated cowardly justice system in Germany.
German legal scholars and organisations critical of Islam are equally shocked. The Giordano Bruno Foundation’s Institute for Worldview Law, which advocates a secular legal policy and state neutrality, is now making serious accusations in this regard, as reported by Die Welt: ‘The impression arises that the totalitarian Iranian regime has succeeded in exerting influence on the German criminal prosecution of Iranians in exile – this is both shocking and disturbing,’ the newspaper quotes Institute Director Jörg Scheinfeld as saying.
The Professor of Criminal Law at the University of Mainz is further outraged: ‘The fact that the Iranian regime in Germany, of all countries, can initiate the prosecution of those who have fled from it and who rightly criticise it for its perversion of religion, shows very clearly how absurd and misguided the criminal provision of Section 166 of the German Criminal Code is.’
It is now fair to say that British standards have found their way into the Federal Republic of Germany. On the island – at the latest with the takeover of the government by Labours under Prime Minister Keir Starter, which has been completely infiltrated by Islamists – Western liberal tolerance, freedom of religion and freedom of speech have only had a theoretical meaning since the slightest criticism of Muslim organisations has been sufficient for draconian prosecution.