Author: fredalanmedforth

by Giulio Meotti

“Historical peoples in a number of cities, districts and departments feel they are in the minority. The demographic change in Europe is extremely spectacular”. So the French philosopher Alain Finkielkraut has just said. Maybe he was thinking of his neighbors.

Although women of foreign nationality are only one sixth of all women of childbearing age in Belgium, half of all children in Belgium are now born to foreign women. This is the picture that emerged from the Institute of Statistics. One third of Belgium’s population is of foreign origin and Belgians are already in the minority in Brussels. But the “Great Replacement” is just a far-right fantasy as everyone knows … A fantasy shared by Statbel.

As of January 1, 2020, the population of Belgium was made up of 67.9 percent Belgians of Belgian origin. Ten years ago, in 2010, the share of Belgians of Belgian origin was 74.3 per cent. The Belgian ethnic population is dwindling rapidly. In the Brussels Region, the share of people of foreign nationality is now at 35.3 per cent.

“In Brussels, indigenous Belgians represent a third of the population,” explains Rtbf. “They range from European civil servants to Afghan asylum seekers, passing through the Turkish grocer, the Moroccan social worker or the Congolese doctor. In Belgium, population growth is exclusively due to immigration ”.

What does the Belgian case tell us? That we need to think carefully before following the sirens of those asking for millions of economic migrants to enter Europe.

Arend Lijphart, a Dutch political scientist working at the University of California, has influenced generations of Western colleagues (in Italy the scholar’s work was published by the Mill) by praising Belgium for its “mild consensual democracy”. The consequences have been the explosion in the number of parties, hyper-proportionalism in Parliament, the domination of Parliament over the government and state multiculturalism. A “cold Bosnia” in the heart of Europe.

A first wave of immigration was organized under the pressure of heavy industry. First with European countries (Italy, Spain, Greece). Then, from 1964, with the countries of Muslim culture (Morocco, Turkey, Algeria) to facilitate the reception of foreign workers. Regardless of any cultural considerations, family immigration was encouraged to cope with the aging population (remember anything?).

More than one million entered Belgium legally between 2000 and 20101. In the 2009-2011 period alone, family reunification, which represents half of the residence permits, allowed 121,000 foreigners to settle in Belgium.

Since 2007, the annual number of foreign arrivals to Belgium has invariably exceeded 100,000. In 25 years, the immigrant population (of foreign or Belgian nationality) has doubled. On 1 January 2018, of the 11.3 million inhabitants of Belgium, 16.7 percent were born abroad (1.9 million people). These data do not take into account illegal immigrants or asylum seekers.

The city of Antwerp, the second largest in the country, now has more immigrants than natives. And as a deputy revealed, “78 per cent of children aged 1 to 6 are foreigners”. The 2020 data show that Brussels will formally be the capital of the European Union, but by now it has very little European. Mohamed, Mohammed and Ahmed are the three most popular names in the whole Brussels region. “The city has a high percentage of Muslims and in some neighborhoods they are even the majority,” explains Le Figaro. “41 percent of public school students take the Muslim religion course”.

“Belgium will become Arab”. This prediction does not come from a dangerous right-wing conspirator, but from a journalist, Fawzia Zouari, on the pages of the daily Jeune Afrique to summarize “the Islamization of minds”. And so the country par excellence of national fusion is disappearing, the melting pot of identities that had to annihilate them all, the homeland of any European man who has become terra nullius.

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/319092

In the coming year, numerous IS returnees are to be released from prison. The Christian Democratic Union (CDU) demands immediate measures in an interview with the newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ). “The federal and state security and justice authorities must act now to prevent harm to the population,” said Alexander Throm, the interior policy spokesman of the CDU/CSU parliamentary group in the German Parliament.

Throm also referred to the attacks in Vienna and Dresden last year. This shows how real the threat posed by Islamists released from prison is.

At the weekend, the President of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, Thomas Haldenwang, had also warned of the danger posed by Islamist terror. Haldenwang complained that IS returnees in custody often hold on to their convictions. “We have to realise that radicalisation often does not abate,” Haldenwang told the newspapers of the Funke Media Group

His authority is asked to examine each individual case. “We need to know what is happening in the prisons, which people are still radicalised. For this, there must be an intensive exchange between the judiciary and the security authorities – we are already on the right path.Several former supporters of the terrorist militia Islamic State had to stand trial on suspicion of terrorism and other charges after arriving in Germany, and quite a number of them were convicted. According to the newspaper FAZ, however, the Office for the Protection of the Constitution could not say how many extremists were in custody and how many were soon to be released from prison.Union politician Throm criticises the incomplete data situation. This must change urgently. In addition, the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) interior politician told the FAZ that he is calling for retrospective preventive detention for prisoners who have become radicalised while in custody.

.https://www.rnd.de/politik/islamisten-in-haft-alexander-throm-cducsu-warnt-vor-anstehenden-entlassungen-Z5ULOGLXCFDBBBPWMVNAUZ3S44.html

The Dutch cabinet has signed “legally binding agreements” with Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum. The cabinet admitted this in response to parliamentary questions submitted by Gideon van Meijeren of the Forum for Democracy party.

Great Reset propagandist Schwab’s World Economic Forum, a supreme globalist organization, believes that the Coronavirus has to be used to carry out a worldwide transformation to socialism, where totalitarian state control must be introduced everywhere. Because that is “safe” and “efficient” according to Schwab, who looks and acts like a villain from a James Bond film.

Schwab had earlier complained about people spreading this notion as a “conspiracy theory” but the WEF’s website openly discusses these topics to transform society. The contents of his plans are downright shocking. Humans have to merge with the latest technology, break all meaningful bonds and give up all bodily autonomy and freedom only to be surveilled full-time.

The Great Reset, a globalist utopia, is therefore essentially a more extreme version of communism made possible by technology.

Mainstream Dutch politicians however, have a warm relationship with this revolting organization and its creepy boss. The Forum for Democracy wanted to know what mutual agreements have been signed on matters of which the voter knows nothing.

In their response, the cabinet has admitted to FVD MP Gideon van Meijeren, who submitted the questions, that there has indeed been close cooperation between the cabinet and WEF. And yes, agreements were also signed with the Stalinist organization… and those agreements are legally binding.

“Dutch ministers regularly participate in meetings organized by the WEF,” said the cabinet in the answer to Van Meijeren’s parliamentary questions. “In addition, there are partnerships with the WEF that have been established in the following areas: Sustainable Investment Policy, Tropic Forest Alliance, Food System Initiative, Food Innovation Hubs.”

It added: “The obligations set out in these agreements are legally binding.”

How did the WEF become a supranational body that really determines what happens in the Netherlands and other countries? Until recently, very few voters have understood the role that the WEF has played in usurping their democratic right to choose their representatives.

FvD leader Thierry Baudet commented on the alarming response: “Seven months ago: Chamber blocked a debate on The Great Reset. Because they said it was a ‘conspiracy theory’. After persistent questions, the FVD finally received incontrovertible evidence this week that Klaus Schwab’s agenda is leading [Dutch Premier] Rutte et al. They have been totally exposed.”

Wow…. In antwoord op uitstekende Kamervragen van @GideonvMeijeren geeft de regering toe dat er overeenkomsten gesloten zijn met het World Economic Forum die “juridisch bindend” zijn! Zijn die overeenkomsten openbaar? Wie onderhandelt dit uit namens wie? Wat is de rol van de TK? pic.twitter.com/NZPiM4JOF1

— Pepijn van Houwelingen (@PvanHouwelingen) December 17, 2021

The Corona crisis is no longer a health crisis, but an economic one and it should be clear to anyone that this crisis did not strike by chance like a force of nature. The lockdowns have worked like a charm since they starved small and medium-sized businesses and thus greatly helped to boost the wealth of the super rich.

They have played all too well into the hands of Schwab and his wealthy supporters. Because according to this year’s Forbes list of the richest people, 660 new billionaires were minted – an increase of a staggering 30 percent compared to the previous year.

The Amazon founder Jeff Bezos was able to gain almost 100 billion dollars and popular figure Bill Gates also gained 31 billion dollars. Facebook boss Mark Zuckerberg, whose platform is now called Meta, received an additional 71 billion and other tech giants such as Larry Page and Sergey Brin (both Google) were able to grow into the double-digit billion range. The absolute winner with an unimaginable increase of 138 billion is however Tesla boss Elon Musk.

So essentially, this “pandemic” is a money grab: The redistribution of wealth to the very rich is also in full swing thanks to the experimental gene therapy injections. At the top of the winners is co-founder and BioNTech CEO Ugur Sahin, who is now worth a whopping $13.3 billion. Close behind is Stéphane Bancel, CEO of Moderna with $12.5 billion. Numerous other pharmaceutical company executives have also benefited, as have corporate investors such as Bill Gates and suppliers such as ROVI, which produce vaccine vials.

A little curiously, supply chains were interrupted by a container ship that got stuck in the Suez Canal after a strange maneuver (the course was described as the shape of a giant penis). Shipping container prices have multiplied since then – from around $2 000 to over $9 000. The prices of raw materials rose to unimaginable high levels while gas and energy prices shot up as well. This in turn had an impact on fertilizer production and thus on food prices which will be felt only next year.

The already galloping inflation is likely to pick up even further which will benefit only those with assets.

https://freewestmedia.com/2021/12/23/dutch-cabinet-members-entered-legally-binding-agreements-with-wef/

After the German government was faced with accusations that the federal republic uses taxpayer money to fund anti-Israel NGOs, BDS, and terrorism activities, German officials used allegedly harsh and undiplomatic language in internal messages about an expose launched by the Israeli organization Im Tirtzu Building the Zionist Deam, Israel National News can reveal.

Matan Peleg, CEO of Im Tirtzu, on Monday told Israel National News: “We’ve always said that the German government is in a state of self-denial, where on the one hand it purports to work to resolve the conflict, and on the other hand it funds anti-Zionist propaganda groups that profit from the conflict and work to escalate it.”

He added that “Now, after seeing their internal correspondence between the various divisions at their Foreign Ministry, it turns out that they are simply lying to each other.

The German government can either let this deception continue, or it can stop funding organizations that profit from the conflict and from human suffering such as B’Tselem, which is on the top level of disgracefulness.”

In a complex back and forth email exchange between the German foreign ministry and former Chancellor Angela Merkel’s chancellery, a text email was ostensibly mistakenly sent to Im Tirtzu as part of the German government’s authorized response. The message reveals a rare look into the inner workings of top German diplomats and officials who deal with Israel.

The German officials seemed to express nervousness about the importance and “range of the organization [Im Tirtzu] in Israel” and expected that part of the government’s formal response to Im Tirzu’s letter would be published in the media.

The background email was sent by an official in the foreign ministry. Israel National News sent a press query to the official.

In the internal dialogue, which was seemingly unintentionally included in the email by the official, the following quote appeared: “In addition, the organization [Im Tirzu] does not shy away from polemical exaggeration (‘these propaganda organizations thrive off conflict and need it to survive, and Germany has turned the conflict into a business’) nor from proven false claims.”

The German foreign ministry’s note referenced sections of Peleg’s October letter to Merkel that triggered the row.

Peleg wrote that “The government of Germany is working subversively and undemocratically to change the character of another democratic state – a state that provides more human rights than any other in the Middle East – by funding domestic organizations that openly work to undermine it.”

Germany casted doubt on Im Tirtzu’s contention that “On September, 28, 2021, a B’Tselem activist was caught setting fire to an Arab building in a Hebron in order to frame Jews.”

In a December letter obtained by Israel National News, Peleg wrote that the official, “in her response to Mrs.[Nina] Bernhard and other German officials denied that a member of B’Tselem was caught in September setting fire to an Arab building in the Herbon region in order to incriminate Jews, despite the fact that the incident was widely publicized in Israeli media (as was reported on Channel 12 News).”

Israel National News sent press queries to the German foreign ministry and Bernhard.

The spat between Im Tirtzu and the German foreign ministry started in October when the Israeli NGO charged Germany with “both direct funding (via the German Foreign Ministry) and indirect funding (via governmental foundations), Germany provides extensive funding to Israeli political organizations that promote the BDS movement, work to exert international pressure on Israel, work to change Israel’s immigrations policies, and even work to change Israel’s policy against terrorism by means of legal and international pressure.”

BDS is an abbreviation for the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions campaign targeting the Jewish state. The German Bundestag labelled BDS antisemitic in a 2019 resolution.

According to Im Tirtzu, “Over the past several years, Germany alone has funded 34 political organizations in Israel, all of whom are affiliated with the far-left. From 2012 – 2021, Germany has provided NIS 84, 204, 316 (22.5 million euro) – a tremendous sum, especially by Israeli standards.”

Im Tirtzu wrote that “Seventeen percent of the 22.5 million euro funded by Germany to these radical groups has gone toward organizations that provide legal protection to murderous terrorists and their family members in Israeli courts”.

In their letter, Im Tirtzu, mentioned as an example that one of these organizations, has provided in recent years legal protection for 81 terrorists and their families. “These terrorists are responsible for the murder of 77 people.” they wrote.

The NGO also took B’Tselem to task for its allegedly anti-Israel conduct. “ Germany also substantially funds the B’Tselem organization, which received 9,107,706 euro from Germany from 2012 – 2021.”

The German government wrote in its response to Im Tirtzu that “The Federal Government does not cooperate with partners that promote or engage in violence or deny Israel’s right to exist. We do not fund projects that actively promote BDS. German political foundations are not state entities and engage independently of the Federal Government. In this sense too, we do not necessarily endorse all views expressed by civil society partners or independent organizations, whose fundamental right to freedom of expression is part of democratic and pluralistic societies like Israel and Germany.?

The Federal government statement added that “Allegations of any involvement with sanctioned individuals or entities as well as misconduct are taken very seriously are and are investigated diligently. Our partner organizations are obliged by law to submit detailed spending and activity reports. In the same vein, we stand by human rights defenders and civil society organizations who face false accusations and disinformation campaigns.”

Peleg said “The hard-earned tax money of German citizens would be better spent on their own welfare, not on fueling the flames of the conflict in another country. Just as Israel does not fund political organizations in Germany that seek to change Germany’s immigration or economic policy, or that provide legal protection to murderous terrorists and their families, so too Germany should not be funding such organizations in Israel.”

He added that “ it is important to note that we will continue using our wide influence in Israel to prevent Germany’s undemocratic intervention in our affairs. With all due respect, Israel is not a German colony.”

The Press department of the Federal Foreign Office of German responded: “As a matter of policy, we do not comment on internal correspondence or consultation processes.”

“The work of the German political foundations is not undertaken at the behest of the Government. The foundations select their own projects and are responsible for their implementation.”

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/318948

On Sunday December 19, a 60-year-old man was attacked in the subway of the railway station in Ambérieu-en-Bugey, about 50 km from Lyon, when he went to pick up his grandson. The victim was stabbed in the neck and required several stitches.

Investigators considered a terrorist background because of the attacker’s modus operandi. No robbery, no spoken words and no connection to the victim.

https://www.fdesouche.com/2021/12/22/amberieu-en-bugey-01-un-homme-poignarde-a-la-gorge-un-mineur-interpelle-la-piste-terroriste-envisagee/

For weeks now, the newly discovered Corona variant Omicron has been misused by politics and the mainstream media to spread even more fear and panic. The doctor who discovered this variant does not understand the overreaction in Europe and warned that this could lead to a missed opportunity.

The disease is mild and the spread of Omicron could lead to natural immunity in the population. That would be an advantage if new variants emerge again. Lockdowns would, however, prevent this positive development.

The South African doctor Dr. Angelique Coetzee reported the first Omicron case and treated it. In an article in the British newspaper Daily Mail the doctor was surprised at the exaggerated reaction to the variant in Europe. “Let me be clear: nothing I’ve seen in this new variant justifies the extreme measures the British government has taken in response,” said Coetzee, shocked after UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson urged people to “think carefully” before attending Christmas parties and social events.

“I was stunned by the response,” she said. “Nobody here in South Africa has been hospitalized with the Omicron variant, and it is also assumed that nobody here is seriously ill with it,” added Coetzee.

“My first Omicron case, a young man who came to my practice who initially believed he had been in the sun too long after working outdoors. Patients typically come with aches and pains in their muscles and limbs, headaches, and some tiredness. And their symptoms don’t seem to be getting worse. They subside after about five days, and that’s it,” she explained, describing the mild course of the disease.

Patients are treated at home with anti-inflammatory drugs such as ibuprofen and low doses of cortisone. Contrary to the alarmism in Europe, there are no considerations in South Africa to impose new restrictions or lockdowns. The doctor explained that one has got used to new variants. “When our scientists confirmed the discovery of another one, no one made anything big of it. Lots of people didn’t even notice.”

She also pointed out that relatively few people in South Africa have had the experimental preparations. So far, just over 31 percent have had an injection, and around 26 percent have been jabbed stung. “Even unprotected bodies repel this variant much more easily than Delta.”

South African data analyst Pieter Streicher agreed with Coetzee’s take on the Omicron variant, saying it could in fact end the pandemic.

https://freewestmedia.com/2021/12/22/omicron-discoverer-perplexed-by-hysterical-global-response/

Wuppertal is well known. With around 350,000 inhabitants, the city is the economic, educational and cultural centre of the Bergisch district, which is located in the federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia and is the seventeenth largest city in Germany. It is best known for its suspension railway – the only one of its kind in a major German city. That could soon change. In a few years, Wuppertal may be the first city in Germany to have its own Turkish district. Will non-Muslims be allowed to enter it then?

This is really new in Germany: the Turkish-controlled Islamic cultural association DITIB – specifically the Turkish-Islamic Union of the Institute for Religion e.V. – wants to build a whole new district in Wuppertal-Elberfeld. The new quarter is to cost around 30 million euros, which is to come from unknown “sponsors”. DITIB has been working on a feasibility study for about ten years, which has now become public. On 6,000 square metres, architect Cengiz Müjde is planning bars, grocery shops, nursing homes and, of course, a mosque with a large minaret and cupola visible from afar.

“In addition, we want to offer a kindergarten. For the elderly, we offer assisted living. But the business will also create new jobs,” the architect reveals his plans and tries to make the project attractive to the local population with jobs that are urgently needed in the region.

Almost all the land needed already belongs to the association. Where the association got the money for the plots of land, the planners of the district do not say. And not a word is said about where the investors will come from. It is well known that the Turkish state controls DITIB. Whether it will finance the project directly or indirectly is a matter of speculation. But would the immigration-friendly German government seriously oppose a foreign state interfering in the construction of city districts?

How such a district fits in with the government’s propaganda that it supports the integration of immigrants remains a mystery, because the project would further segregate the population. On the other hand, such a district would further promote the formation of parallel societies, and other speculators could also detect a business model for other cities. Is this really what is intended? Because in Wuppertal, two more mosques are already being planned or built elsewhere, which the city – as expected – willingly supports. These are a mosque of the Moroccan community and a mosque of the Kurdish cultural association. </div>How such a district fits in with the government’s propaganda that it supports the integration of immigrants remains a mystery, because the project would further segregate the population. On the other hand, such a district would further promote the formation of parallel societies, and other speculators could also detect a business model for other cities. Is this really what is intended? Because in Wuppertal, two more mosques are already being planned or built elsewhere, which the city – as expected – willingly supports. These are a mosque of the Moroccan community and a mosque of the Kurdish cultural association.

Only the announcement that the city’s Antifa Centre, a meeting place for numerous left-wing extremists, which is located on the planned site, would have to make way for it, caused a lot of scorn and ridicule, because the left-wing extremists, who should actually welcome the project, suddenly have a critical attitude towards it. But of course the city of Wuppertal can be relied on to find a new home for the extremists.

The mainstream media and the old parties have so far been conspicuously reticent with criticism or applause. Only the AfD has commented on the ambitious plan: “It is to be feared that the construction of a ‘Ditib’ quarter will lead to existing parallel societies moving even further away from the majority society and that people will eventually live there according to their own rules and values – which will ultimately be dictated by Erdogan and fundamentalists close to him. Tomorrow, ‘Ditib’ could claim to want to live there as autonomously as possible,” says AfD board member Joachim Paul, criticising the plan. But Islamisation is not happening at all, is it?

https://www.wochenblick.at/politik/ditib-will-tuerken-stadtteil-in-wuppertal-errichten/

To justify socially oppressive and economically harmful 2G COVID-19 restrictions on the unvaccinated, Peter Tschentscher, the left-wing mayor of Hamburg who is also a medical doctor, deliberately misled the public, citing patently false information which suggested nearly all of those infected with COVID-19 were unvaccinated, according to German media news reports.

Prominent lawmakers are now calling on Mayor Peter Tschentscher (SPD) to resign from his post after it was revealed that he used false data, which maintained 95 percent of the COVID-infected people in the Hanseatic city were unvaccinated, to justify the implementation of strict 2G restriction measures on the unvaccinated to purportedly curb the spread of the virus, Die Welt reports.

Former German Chancellor Angela Merkel, center, Bavarian Prime Minister Markus Soeder, left, and the Mayor of Hamburg Peter Tschentscher, right, attend a joint press conference at the chancellery in Berlin, Germany, Wednesday, June 17, 2020. All three politicians are known to be champions of harsh COVID-19 restrictions and mandatory vaccination.(AP Photo/Markus Schreiber, Pool)

The SPD mayor’s false claim that 95 percent of people infected with COVID-19 in Hamburg had not been vaccinated paved the way for the state’s Senate — ruled by a coalition between the Greens and the SPD — to become the first federal state in Germany to introduce the so-called 2G system. Following the introduction of the 2G measures in his state, Tschentscher then lobbied publicly for the 2G system to be applied throughout the entire Federal Republic of Germany.

On Nov. 16, Tschentscher justified the corona measures with the high incidence value of the unvaccinated, saying, “Of our 3,452 new infections this calendar week, over 90 percent are in people without full vaccination protection,” said the mayor during a press conference.

„Die Inzidenz zwischen geimpften und ungeimpften Personen zu unterscheiden, ist wegen des sehr unterschiedlichen Infektionsgeschehens und der sich daraus ergebenen Eingriffstiefe von möglicherweise erforderlichen Maßnahmen zur Eindämmung der Pandemie geboten,“ antwortete mir … https://t.co/YYW9kp6MjR

— Mathias Pellack (@mathias_pellack) December 20, 2021

“Because of those who have not yet been vaccinated, the incidence has an impact. Against this background, we said in Hamburg in August: We need more security in such a situation, which consists in the fact that there are simply too many unvaccinated people. And that’s why we were the first federal state in Germany to introduce a 2G rule for areas where there is a higher risk of infection,” he said during the conference.

Under the 2G system, entry into public spaces like restaurants, gyms, cafes, theaters, and other cultural venues is restricted unless an individual can provide official documentation that they’re either fully vaccinated or have recovered from the COVID-19 virus.

The mayor’s honesty and integrity were both brought into question when his colleague Anna-Elisabeth von Treuenfels-Frowein, a lawmaker for the Free Democratic Party (FDP), submitted an information request to the Hamburg Senate which ultimately revealed that the number of unvaccinated individuals infected with COVID-19 was significantly lower than Tschentscher had claimed.

Epidemiological data from calendar week 35 — which began on Aug. 30 and ended on Sept. 5 — that was released by the Senate showed that 68.3 percent of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 were unvaccinated. More recently, however, a mere 14.3 of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 were unvaccinated. The figures were further skewed by the fact that all cases where the patient’s vaccination status had been unknown were included in the unvaccinated category.

Despite the Hamburg mayor claiming in a press conference on Nov. 16, 2021 that 95 percent of the cases of infected people were unvaccinated during calendar week 45, the data released by the state’s Senate at the behest of Treuenfels-Frowein’s request revealed that 63.2 percent of patients infected with COVID-19 had an unknown vaccination status, 22.5 percent were vaccinated, and 14.3 percent were unvaccinated.

When asked by the German newspaper BILD how 14.3 percent became 95 percent, and how the actual data justified the 2G rule that he imposed, Tschentscher replied, saying: “If there has been any uncertainty, I very much regret it. I assure the people of Hamburg that our recommendations are very well-founded.”

“One reason seems to be the use of different IT systems that provide different categories for the vaccination status. In addition, the rapidly increasing number of infections could no longer be classified quickly enough,” Tschentscher added.

Wolfgang Kubicki, FDP vice chairman and member of Germany’s federal parliament, has rejected the mayor’s excuses and believes his claims were deliberately deceptive.

“It is unbelievable and a disaster for trust in the integrity of state action when a state government clearly presents manipulated figures. Mayor Tschentscher will have to explain himself to parliament and should say why the Hamburg Senate considers it necessary to deceive its citizens with such tricks,” Kubicki said.

Treuenfels-Frowein also slammed the mayor, saying: “I consider this approach to be irresponsible. Anyone who, among other things, interferes with fundamental rights based on incorrect numbers should not be surprised if their acceptance among Hamburgers is rapidly declining. I would go one step further: Anyone who does this is legally responsible.”

Meanwhile, pressure continues to build on the unvaccinated. Despite Chancellor Angela Merkel and all major chancellor candidates promising no vaccine mandates in the run-up to federal elections, all have now backtracked and openly support mandatory vaccination.

https://rmx.news/germany/is-germanys-restrictive-2g-system-for-the-unvaccinated-based-on-a-lie/