A trans-identified male sex offender who attempted to enroll at a local high school in Oregon has been sentenced to 20 days in jail and two years’ probation. Alec Ray Craig, who uses the name Makayla Craig, 27, was arrested last December after an officer at at South Albany High School reported him for pretending to be a 15 year-old girl in order to register as a student.
Craig has told school administrators that his name was Madison and provided a false date of birth. Upon his arrest, it was discovered that Craig is a registered sex offender. He was then arrested on charges of computer crimes, forgery, and false swearing.
“The person appeared to be an adult but was portraying themselves as a 15-year-old girl. After further investigation, the individual gave a false name and date of birth attempting to enroll in high school,” a statement from Albany Police Department read. When announcing Craig’s arrest online, law enforcement turned off comments in response to what they regarded as “hate speech.”
Many replies expressed frustration that the authorities had not included a photo of the sex offender, who was convicted of sexually abusing a minor in 2023. Details regarding his prior conviction were also noticeably absent.
Craig appeared before Linn County Court on April 4, where prosecutors requested a jail sentence of 40 days.
“She, as a registered sex offender, is trying to pretend that she is a juvenile… to become- to be involved with other juveniles in the high school system,” said prosecutor Coleen Cerda.
However, Craig’s defense counsel argued that this period of time in jail would not “serve the purpose that we want” and proposed that community service would be sufficient.
“I don’t know that jail really serves the purpose that perhaps we want,” defense attorney Erik Moeller countered. “And compensatory service, or community service, would better serve the community.”
Craig was ultimately sentenced to 20 days in jail, two years’ probation and was ordered to stay at least 500 feet away from schools.
On social media, Craig uses various terms associated with online fetish communities to describe himself. He has referred to himself as a “femboi,” a label synonymous with the transgender community, as well as a “furry” and a “therian,” indicating that he identifies as a non-human animal. In June 2022, Craig posted a “transfeline Pride” flag to his account, indicating that he identifies as a cat.
Multiple local news outlets reported on Craig’s case while referring to the child sexual abuser as simply a “woman.”
Many male mass migrants are not the only ones holding a knife in their hand: a Syrian former primary school teacher is on trial at Stuttgart District Court. The 40-year-old Sahari A. allegedly stabbed a girl in a playground and injured several young people. Reason: allegedly insulting her own daughter. “I want to kill this girl. This girl shall not live long”, was the Muslim woman’s alleged battle cry before she stabbed the girl.
A harrowing trial once again reveals the devastating consequences of unbridled mass migration from Islamic countries: A 40-year-old Syrian woman, Sahari A., is on trial at Stuttgart Regional Court for attempted manslaughter.
The accusation: the Syrian woman, allegedly a primary school teacher in her home country, is said to have brutally attacked four girls on a playground in Magstadt. The ex-teacher, who accepted Merkel’s invitation in 2015 and arrived in Germany with her entire family – four children and her husband – is said to have beaten her 14-year-old daughter. The daughter was then taken into the care of the youth welfare office. The Syrian woman apparently blamed her daughter’s 14-year-old classmate for this.
According to the indictment, the mother blamed a 15-year-old classmate of her daughter for her being taken into care by the youth welfare office. She is said to have shouted in Arabic: “I want to kill this girl. This girl shall not live long.” The girl, who was then suddenly attacked by the murderous Muslim woman, only narrowly escaped – because a boy stopped the furious woman – but suffering a deep cut to his cheek. According to the police, the Muslim woman injured three other girls aged between 13 and 16 with blows.
In court, the girl tearfully told the witness stand: ‘Suddenly she stood in front of me and hit me.’ What the schoolgirl did not realise at first was that Sahari A. was allegedly holding a knife in her hand. The prosecutor explained: ‘She stabbed the blade towards my neck.’
The accused appeared in court in Stuttgart fully veiled – covered up except for her eyes. Judge Monika Lamberti, however, did not accept the masquerade wearing an Islamic covering, according to the Bild newspaper. The Muslim woman then complained that she was allowed to cover herself in an “Islamic state”.
This case shows what uncontrolled immigration from Islamic countries has flushed into our country and threatens our security on a daily basis.
In a sign of deteriorating levels of freedom of speech and attacks on the press, a German court has slapped the editor-in-chief of Deutschland Kurier, David Bendels, with seven months probation, according to the newspaper.
The Bamberg District Court found that a satirical photo montage about Federal Minister Nancy Faeser to be an instance of “defamation against political figures,” under Paragraph 188 of the German Criminal Code (StGB).
The photomontage was shared in Bendel’s newspaper, and she is seen holding up a sign that reads: “I hate freedom of expression.” The satirical creation was based on a real photo of Faeser where she was holding a “We Remember” sign to mark Holocaust Remembrance Day.
Politicians are also chiming in with their opinion on the verdict. AfD MP Beatrix von Storch write on X: “I believe that one MUST be able to believe that Ms. Faeser hates freedom of speech. And if she reports something like that and then gets sentenced to seven months in prison, it’s no longer an opinion. It’s apparently a verified fact.”
Ich bin der Meinung, dass man der Meinung sein können MUSS, dass Frau Faeser die Meinungsfreiheit hasst. Und wenn sie sowas anzeigt und man dann dafür 7 Monate Gefängnis bekommt- ist es keine Meinung mehr. Sondern offenbar eine verifizierte Tatsache. pic.twitter.com/oHXJFcaQQF
— Beatrix von Storch (@Beatrix_vStorch) April 7, 2025
One of Faeser’s most controversial statements during her term of interior minister was: “Those who mock the state must be dealt with by a strong state.” It appears with this verdict, she is sending exactly that message.
🇩🇪 These are harrowing words from far left German Interior Minister Nancy Faeser.
The SPD politician is pushing to introduce 13 new measures to clamp on "right-wing extremists," but these "extremists" will inevitably be the rival anti-immigration @AfD party.
Faeser actually filed the criminal complaint herself, which is part of a general trend of German politicians filing criminal complaints against citizens for “insults” and “memes.”
The conviction is especially shocking in terms of how satire is produced in Germany, with satirical magazine Titanik filling every issue with harsh and offensive content mocking politicians, especially those from the right. Late-night hosts like Jan Böhmermann are equally harsh towards the right, yet suffer no such consequences. The Cologne Carnival also features incredibly offensive floats, including those targeting AfD’s Alice Weidel.
NEW – Alice Weidel, leader of the German AfD party, will be presented tomorrow on a carnival float in Düsseldorf as a "swastika witch" with a wart on her nose who seduces first-time voters. pic.twitter.com/CardGpN7ZK
The editor, Bendel, says that he and his newspaper, Deutschland Kurier, “will not accept this verdict” and will “fight it with all legal means at their disposal.”
He said they will “continue the just fight for freedom of the press and freedom of expression, which is indispensable for the continued existence of democracy in Germany, with determination, stability and the utmost consistency.
Last year, the Bamberg District Court issued three ruling against Bendels, including for the Faeser picture. In total, he received fines that he must pay over the course of 480 days for three separate cases. He is now ordered to also apologize to Faeser. He has appealed all of the verdicts.
Fear of Russian revanchism may set back decades of work by European governments to erode individual responsibility in favour of a more collectivist model, with the public now increasingly told to be ready to take control for their own survival.
The German Interior Ministry led by social democrat-left caretaker minister Nancy Faeser is intervening to introduce civil defence into the school curriculum, a report by the Handelsblatt newspaper states. In Germany, education is the responsibility of individual states but the Federal government wants to push this matter and will prepare education material to be distributed to the states, it is said.
A ministry spokesman cited in the report said of the decision to introduce emergency preparedness to children: “Given the recent developments in the security situation, a greater focus should be placed on civil defence, including in school education… [it is] important that citizens have emergency supplies at home to deal with various emergency situations, so that they can help themselves, their families, and those around them, and even save lives in an emergency”.
The perceived threat of Russia invading its neighbours or a hot war with NATO suddenly breaking out are cited as the reason for this change in policy, with better preparedness for natural disasters like floods named as a convenient bonus.
The German government moving to a more prepared state is only the latest such manifestation of wider European political concern about war. In recent months Sweden has issued an updated version of its Cold War-era survival handbook, the United Kingdom has told citizens to have a battery powered radio and a flashlight at home, and NATO has green-lit the public stockpiling bottled water.
Last month, the European Commission appealed to the people of the continent to take similar precautions, and this communication was specifically cited by the German government as informing their own thinking. European crisis management Commissioner Hadja Lahbib heralded this change with a slick social media video, saying that preparedness must be a new way of life for Europe, and listing recommended every-day-carry items like bottled water, a pocketknife, and cash.
While the government telling the public they should take steps to ensure their own survival, conceding that the cashless society isn’t resilient, and even encouraging people to carry a pocketknife may all we welcomed by the liberty-minded, it also comes as an admission of failure. Europeans are ultra-taxpayers, the social contract justifying earners losing a considerable slice of their income in return for a cossetting welfare state, but one which is now tacitly admitted to be fragile and unable to step up in a crisis.
Some of these messages very directly contradict long-honed government narratives. Official European Union advice to carry a pocketknife daily — “a must have” — would cause abject horror in London, for instance, where the government is working hard to stamp out knife carrying altogether with strict, restrictive laws and tough penalties in preference to tackling knifemen as the cause of knife crime.
The shift to a cashless society, made government policy across Europe during the coronavirus lockdown era and strongly objected to by right wing activists worried about loss of liberty is also undermined by the admission that in an emergency, payment cards can’t be relied upon.
Commissioner Lahbib, for instance, said to always carry “some cash. In the middle of a crisis, cash is king, and your credit card might just be a piece of plastic”.
As for Germany, launching preparedness in schools has reasonably broad cross-party support, with opposition coming from the hard-left, for instance, which argues such moves are actually intended to militarise society for future war. In other cases, the Euro leadership-adjacent media has accused the “far right” of attempting to undermine such initiatives.
Establishment conservative CDU party defence spokesman Roderich Kiesewetter told Handelsblatt of the plan that he found it “absolutely necessary that emergency situations be practiced, because students are particularly vulnerable and particularly affected in an emergency”.
He said Germany is far less prepared for emergencies than other European states which actually border Russia. Finland, which never gave up its 20th century system of near-universal conscription and military service for teenagers and which has extensive Civil Defence preparedness was cited as a particular example to follow.
Kiesewetter said: “Compared to our Nordic and eastern neighbours, Germany has very little resilience, and our crisis preparedness structures are backward”, saying Germany has ‘hardly any state stockpiles, shelters, or resilient crisis communication technology’, states the paper.
Germany engaged in a such an enthusiastic post-Cold War selloff of old bunker sites the country no longer knows how many still exist, and could be pressed back into use in an emergency. It is presently starting up a ‘bunker plan‘ to survey the country and rediscover this information, inspired by the Ukrainian experience of war.
Even so, Germany is massively more prepared than some countries, like the United Kingdom for instance, which suspended all Civil Defence preparedness in the 1960s on the logic that spending finite defence money on the nation’s nuclear deterrent was more effective.
French Conservative news channels CNews and Europe 1 are under investigation for their critical coverage of Marine Le Pen’s conviction.
France’s national regulator for audio-visual and digital communication, Arcom, will assess whether either channel met obligations “in terms of pluralism and honesty” while covering the trial and conviction of France’s presidential frontrunner.
A spokesperson of Arcom confirmed to Brussels Signal on April 7 the organisation was alerted in connection with both channels’ coverage of the National Rally de facto leader’s court case in which Le Pen was convicted on March 31.
“As with all other cases to which we are alerted, we will investigate the footage reported to us in accordance with this procedure,” the spokesperson said.
Arcom started the investigation after having received several referrals following the conviction of the presidential frontrunner.
In February, C8, a different TV channel from the same group as CNews, had its highly popular show Touche pas a mon poste pulled from the airwaves by the French Council of State after Arcom refused to renew its licence over a perceived lack of political pluralism.
In his introductory speech, the popular CNews host Pascal Praud said on April 1: “Nine people had decided to ban C8. This time, three judges stopped Ms Le Pen.
“It is possible that we have lost the manual for democracy in France.”
If Arcom found that CNews and/or Europe 1 exceeded the limits set by article 434-25 of the penal code, and “sought to discredit … in conditions likely to undermine the authority of the judiciary or its independence”, then they may have committed an offence punishable by six months imprisonment and a fine of €7,500.
In February 2024, the French Council of State ruled Arcom had to tighten its control over CNews, citing “its obligations in terms of pluralism and independence of information”.
It decided that Arcom must “guarantee” that all French channels maintain “pluralistic expression, considering contributions from all programme participants, including columnists, hosts and guests, while respecting editorial freedom”.
CNews has become the most popular non-stop news channel in France. According to the latest viewership figures, it has been notching up record audiences.
Ezeoke underwent five trials before being convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment MET POLICE
A “callous” murderer who killed a mother and her nephew has won a European human rights claim.
A European court has determined that the human rights of 32-year-old Obina Christopher Ezeoke were violated due to the lengthy delay in his trial.
Ezeoke underwent five trials before being convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment, with a recommendation for a minimum of 40 years to be served.
The European Court of Human Rights ruled that the five-year process leading to Ezeoke’s conviction violated Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which guarantees a fair public hearing within a “reasonable time” for any suspect.
The first trial was dismissed due to the judge’s illness, while the second trial ended because the jury could not reach a verdict.
The third trial, which was a retrial, also concluded without a verdict after a different jury failed to reach one.
Meanwhile the fourth trial, a second retrial, was cut short due to the Covid pandemic.
Although these delays and the trial outcomes were beyond the control of the courts or the government, the Strasbourg court still ruled that they constituted a breach.
However, Ezeoke’s request for immediate release from his life sentence was denied.
The court ruled that despite the delays, his conviction and sentence were fair and did not violate Article 6 in that regard. Additionally, the court determined he was not entitled to any compensation.
Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick said: “This is the latest extraordinary example of judicial activism by the Strasbourg court. It only seems to get worse.”
Ezeoke murdered Annie Ekofo, 53, and her nephew Bervil Kalikaka-Ekofo, 21, after sneaking into their unlocked home in East Finchley, North London in 2016.
The killing was intented as revenge after Ekofo’s son, Ryan Efey, 22, shared footage of him being attacked on Snapchat.
The Old Bailey heard Efey was most likely the intended target, but the killer decided to kill anyone in the flat.
Ezeoke used a Western-style revolver to fire a bullet into the back of the 21-year-old’s head before turning around and shooting his aunt in the chest with the Smith and Wesson. 44.
During sentencing, Judge Justice Cutts stated she had considered a whole-life order but ultimately decided on a life sentence with a minimum term of 40 years.
She said: “Your cold, callous and brutal murders of two people has not only cut short their lives but has ruined the lives of many.”
Juries in May 2018 and March 2019 were unable to reach verdicts, despite the majority of jurors favoring a conviction.
In 2017, the trial was halted when a judge had to withdraw due to severe back pain.
Prosecutors made the unusual decision to pursue a fifth trial after the previous hearing collapsed due to the coronavirus pandemic in March.
Defence lawyers for the defendant argued that “enough is enough” and opposed the continuation of the trial.
In his submission to the European court, the double murderer claimed the repeated delays “had such a detrimental effect on the quality of the defence evidence that the outcome of the fifth trial was ‘at least arguably’ unsafe”.
The court found there were two delays that were “problematic”, specifically the year between the third and fourth trial, and the six months before his permission to appeal was denied.
It unanimously agreed that “there has been a violation of Article 6 of the Convention on account of the excessive length of the criminal proceedings against the applicant”.
Entrance to the ordinariate of the archbishop, Freiburg Breisgau. Wikimedia Commons, CC-BY-SA-2.0-DE, Avemundi
A German archdiocese announced that it will allow the use of “gender stars,” which are asterisks used to indicate gender neutrality, in youth ministry communications.
The Catholic Archdiocese of Freiburg recently issued a Decree on the Use of Gender-Appropriate Language allowing the gender star to be used within German nouns “to express gender sensitivity” in communications for youth ministry, university ministry, and gender identity-focused adult pastoral programs.
The gender star is placed before German masculine or feminine word endings to signify the inclusion of those who identify as “nonbinary” rather than male or female.
Such gender stars are not to be used in “general official correspondence” or the Official Gazette of the archdiocese. Members of the archdiocese have also been instructed to use both feminine and masculine word forms side by side in communications, although they may substitute “gender-neutral” forms.
The decree also states that “Formulations that include a definition of (traditional) role patterns should be avoided and, if possible, replaced by gender-neutral terms (e.g. cleaners instead of cleaning ladies).”
The move to officially recognize “gender neutrality” within diocesan communications marks a radical departure from Scriptural and Catholic Church teaching, as well as human biology. Genesis clearly states that God “created them male and female” (Genesis 5:2).
Sex is genetically determined from conception by an individual’s male (XY) or female (XX) chromosomes and is manifested through male or female sex organs with distinct reproductive functions.
Thus, the pretense that a person can be “gender neutral” is a perverse rejection of God’s will and created order.
The Catholic Church in Germany is notorious for the prevalence of heterodox belief and practice among its laity and clergy, including its bishops. Most notably, the German bishops’ “Synodal Way” conferences have been condemned by prelates around the world for its statements at odds with perennial Church teaching.
As you can confirm by conversing with a moonbat, anyone not on the left is a right-wing extremist. This includes those who oppose any aspect of the liberal agenda — including pedophilia.
Since the state is not in a position to take effective action against paedophile crime [or rather, lacks interest in preventing it], a practice known as ‘pedo-hunting’ has become established. This involves people deliberately trying to track down, expose or confront suspected paedophiles. They often use social media or dating platforms, for example by posing as minors with fake profiles, to make contact with paedophiles. As soon as suspicious behaviour is detected – such as offensive messages – this is documented and tracked. This method was originally developed by citizens’ initiatives that wanted to prevent child abuse, for example by groups such as “Creep Catchers” in Canada or similar groups in the UK, where child abuse on a gigantic scale, committed by migrants, was covered up by the state for years.
Where moonbattery prevails, no good deed goes unspun as a bad deed:
The legitimate and urgently needed fight against paedophilia is now being used in the ‘fight against the political right’ and framed as a ‘new hobby of right-wing extremists’. …
The public broadcaster news programme Tagesschau … reinterprets the topic of “paedo-hunting” as an alleged tool of “right-wing propaganda” …
The spin goes like this: The Office for the Protection of the Constitution observes that right-wing extremists also attract non-political, violent young people with such actions by building up paedophilia as an enemy image. For example, the State Office of Criminal Investigation in Schleswig-Holstein investigated a group that used social media to establish contacts in order to attack people who they accused of having paedophile tendencies – including queer people who were falsely placed in this context. …
[T]he impression is skilfully created that the issue only appears relevant at all due to right-wing agitation.
Meanwhile,
The plan to enshrine the protection of ‘sexual identity’ in the Basic Law has been intensified, particularly under the coalition government.
“Sexual identity” would logically include pedophilia, the next hill for progressives now that they have superficially normalized homosexuality and transsexualism.
In this clip from his longer #NCFWhittle interview, Prof. David Betz, Prof. of War in the Department of War Studies at King’s College London explains that Britain is heading for an ethnic-based civil war which will set urban against rural. He also explains that Islamists are in phase 2 of the classic model of insurgency. Watch the full interview here: • Civil War is Coming: Britain & Americ…
According to Lyon Mag, Mohamed Hichem Medjdoub, who is on trial in Paris for the bomb attack on Rue Victor-Hugo in Lyon (2nd district) in May 2019, took the floor at the last minute on Monday, April 7, after remaining silent throughout the trial. The 29-year-old proudly took responsibility for his crime: ‘All my goals have been achieved and I have no regrets,’ he said smugly.
Medjdoub, who is accused of attempted murder in connection with a terrorist plot, described his offence as a ‘total victory’ and claimed: ‘I am not a coward’. On May 24, 2019, he planted a homemade bomb filled with bullets outside a bakery in the centre of Lyon, injuring around 15 people, including a ten-year-old girl.
He admitted to investigators that he wanted to spread fear in order to favour a victory for the far right and hoped to trigger a civil war. Attorney General Nicolas Braconnay recalled that the lack of deaths was ‘only due to chance’ and called for life imprisonment with 22 years of preventive detention.
On the witness stand, Medjdoub provoked: ‘You don’t impress me, you don’t scare anyone,’ and added: ‘As a Muslim, an Arab and above all as an Algerian, I don’t expect any moralising from the French.’
