Month: March 2025

Shrove Tuesday was marked in London with another farmers’ rally in Whitehall, the fourth in four months. Farmers flipped pancakes and tried to put on a brave face, but a survey released the same day revealed that more than half of UK farms expect to go out of business within the next ten years.

The protests are in response to Labour’s announcement last October that the current 100% relief from inheritance tax for farmers will be restricted to the first £1 million of combined agricultural and business property. Above that, it will be rated at 20%. Although the tactics employed by the Labour government differ from the brutalities of the Soviet regime, the ideological goal driving the farm tax remains identical: the eradication of private ownership.

The measure is deeply unpopular, both with farmers and the public at large, prompting ministers to justify the cash grab as crucial for keeping the NHS afloat. Yet government figures indicate that the measure is only expected to raise £500 million a year for the treasury—equivalent to about 20 hours of NHS spending. So why do it?

Farmers have their own theories. Tim, a farmer from Wiltshire, told GBNews: “It’s an ideological issue—[Labour] is targeting ownership. They’re targeting not just agricultural property relief (APR) but also business property relief (BPR). They’re targeting anyone who wants to have the freedom to do business and to be incentivised to do that.”

Tim is absolutely right. 

In the days leading up to last October’s Autumn Budget, Labour ministers were asked to share their definition of a working person. Labour’s manifesto had promised they would “not increase taxes on working people,” but this raised an obvious question: who exactly were “working people?”

A working person is someone who “goes out and earns their living, usually paid in a sort of monthly cheque,” Prime Minister Keir Starmer told Sky News. When asked whether he would include people who gain an income from shares or assets (as farmers do), he replied “Well, they wouldn’t come within my definition.”

Chancellor Rachel Reeves said they were “strivers who graft,” although apparently, that didn’t include people who graft hard enough to start their own business; her budget included a tax rise on employers’ National Insurance contributions. Reeves confirmed this didn’t fall under her definition of a tax on working people. 

When asked by BBC journalist Laura Kuenssberg “Why are people who run businesses not working people?” Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson dodged the question seven times, although she did offer a definition: “A working person is someone who derives their main income from going out to work”. 

Was Phillipson a working person, Kuenssberg asked, given that as a cabinet minister Phillipson earns a salary in excess of £160,000? Phillipson nodded. “My income derives from my job”, she replied. 

The median farm household income in England was £17,800 in 2021/22; for full-time employees, it was £33,000. “Working people” isn’t a “definition of wages,” Labour minister Pat McFadden explained.

The ministers’ inability to define a working person was largely treated as a joke at the time, given that it seemed nonsensical, but it is no laughing matter. The distinction being drawn here is indeed ideological: it is between the proletarian and the kulak classes. 

‘Kulak’ is a Russian word meaning ‘fist’. It was also the label given by the Communists to those peasants who, following the abolition of serfdom in 1861, had striven and grafted enough to own land and employ workers. Officially the term was reserved for anyone owning more than eight acres of land; in reality owning any asset, even one cow, was enough to earn someone the label. 

Russia’s economy was historically rooted in small-scale agriculture. As the more successful land-owners in their locale, the kulaks not only epitomised capitalistic enterprise, they also tended to be pillars of their communities. They would lend money, provide mortgages, run the local administrative affairs. All of this was anathema to the Communists, who wanted to transform Russia’s economy from small-scale and localised to large-scale and collectivised. For this to happen farming had to be collectivised, and that meant rooting out the kulak class. 

In 1927, heavy taxes and restrictions were imposed upon the kulaks. When that failed to break them, the Communists simply started seizing the land. By late 1929, a plan to “liquidate the kulaks as a class” was underway. In the years 1930–31 some 100,000 kulaks were shot dead. Ten million were sent by cattle truck to remote areas, of which three million died en route. 

“My great-grandfather was dekulakised because he’d installed a wooden floor in the house,” recalled Elena Lanher, talking to Radio Liberty. “He never reached Solovki prison camp, but died on the way.”

By the summer of 1931, the whole of the Ukrainian steppe had been collectivised. Some 40% of the nation’s cattle and 65% of the sheep were slaughtered by the peasants, who would rather kill their animals than hand them over. The inevitable result was famine. Between 1930 and 1933 an estimated 5.7–8.7 million people starved to death across the Soviet empire. Ukraine alone saw between 3.5 and 5 million starve in what became known as the Holodomor—‘murder by hunger’. 

Yet, chillingly, the atrocities were hailed by the Communists as a resounding success, a blow by the workers against “activists, engaged in counter-revolutionary activities.” That narrative was to continue throughout the Soviet era. Anyone who disagreed with the Communist Party must, by definition, be a counter-revolutionary. In fact, only 44% of those arrested under the dekulakisation program were peasant farmers. The rest were clergymen, tradesmen, former Czarist civil servants, teachers, and others deemed part of the “intelligentsia”. Protesting the arrest of your farmer neighbour could result in death or deportation. 

In modern Britain, as in Russia, kulaks are farmers and small business owners, but, as JD Vance pointed out in Munich, they can also be Christians engaged in silent prayer. It’s up to us all to rally at the next farmers’ march. 

Labour’s Ideological War on the Kulaks ━ The European Conservative

The new bearded Syrian dictator had declared “diversity is our strength,” a phrase that came out of Western academic departments, and he had repeated it to European foreign ministers (including Italy’s Tajani, France’s Séjourné, and Germany’s Baerbock), to the UN secretary general, to the Hague prosecutor, to the BBC director, to the spin doctor, and to other gullible Westerners.

Like the “inclusive Taliban,” the jihadists had figured out how to sell themselves to us multicultural idiots.

And so it ended: thousands of innocent people butchered because they were Alawis, Christians and others.

Everything was going great in Syria.

The pompous Antonio Guterres had met the new bearded dictator, Ahmed al Sharaa, alias Al Julani, on March 4.

Four days later, hell.

Hundreds of corpses in the streets and summary executions. At least a thousand dead, including women and children. Entire families exterminated. Alawites, Christians, Druze: no one is spared from the Islamic axe.

“Europe must make its voice heard loud and clear regarding the mass murder of Alawite and Christian civilians in Syria”, Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar told Luxembourg’s Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Xavier Bettel, who was visiting Jerusalem.

Everything has been seen before, even if history, which is a teacher, never has students.

January 20, 1976, Damour, Lebanon. Terrorists from the Palestine Liberation Organization arrive in the predominantly Christian village: 582 civilians dead, all Maronite Christians. “It was an apocalypse,” testified Mansour Labaky, a Maronite Christian priest who survived the massacre. “They were coming, thousands and thousands, shouting ‘Allahu Akbar.’ And they were slaughtering everyone in their path: men, women and children.”

We Westerners are tourists in the heart of darkness: we know nothing and we learn nothing.

There are dozens of videos and testimonies on social media of mass roundups, summary executions of unarmed civilians and looting.

“Alhamdulillah”, they say after massacring civilians. The mainstream media is silent. The UN…nothing.

When Israel defends itself from cutthroats, global indignation.

When entire Syrian villages are erased, only silence.

In January, the jihadists of Damascus were visited by the Foreign Ministers of France and Germany. Then the Hague prosecutor, Karim Khan, arrived in Damascus. Then the EU suspended sanctions against Syria. Everything was going great: Sharia and Jihad were welcomed at the “Palace.”

Next to the jihadists in chief, the international director of the BBC, Jeremy Bowen, all smiles, like a child with his older brother.

The Foreign Minister of Spain also enters the scene, the country most aligned against Israel in the war in Gaza against Hamas.

“I arrive in Damascus, a country full of hope and optimism for a brighter future,” wrote EU Commissioner for Equality Hadja Lahbib on January 17. “I am here to ensure that these people receive the urgent help they need.” In January, the EU wrote a check for €235 million for Damascus.

Also in Damascus is Amy Pope, director of the UN Office for Migration. Also there was Alastair Campbell, Tony Blair’s foolish spin doctor.

A few days later, the religious massacres begin.

Now both the Druze and the Alawites are asking Israel to protect them from the cutthroats. The Alawites who live in Israel in Ghajar have never experienced a day of terror in their history. And Druze and Circassians are entering Israel in search of shelter.

Israel immediately deployed its forces to Syria after the jihadists attacked Damascus to protect the Druze minority in the southwest (many members of this religious community live in Israel and serve in its army). Then Israel destroyed much of the Syrian army’s arsenal, including chemical weapons and long-range missile depots, to prevent all these weapons from falling into the hands of the jihadists. If Israel had not done this, we would probably be talking about a much larger massacre in Syria by now. But instead of receiving thank-you notes, Israel is pilloried for “violating Syria’s sovereignty.”

In the world of the UN, the European Union, the Hague prosecutor, BBC journalists, human rights NGOs, sheep are led to the slaughter, democracies are accused of terrorism and terrorists of “resistance”. In the real Middle East, only a sword stands between a terrorist and a civilian.

In the Middle East, where jihadists reign demonic, the only way to survive is to have military strength and the moral courage to face the barbarians. Thank God that Israel has both. The only other option is to be massacred by butchers like Hamas in Gaza and Al Qaeda in Syria.

Unlike my fellow journalists, I have never deluded myself that, after the military dictatorship, Islamic democracy could flourish. Why should what we see be confined to Syria and Gaza? Answer: It won’t be. One day you will see the same images in Europe. I hope that I will not have to republish this one day, adding: “I warned you.”

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/405298

The Romanian Government has stated it will step up its efforts to “combat illegal content online”.

The news on March 14 came ahead of contentious presidential elections following the annulled ballot of November last year due to claims, considered unsubstantiated in Romanian media, of Russian interference.

Ivan Bogdan, minister of economy, research, innovation and digitalisation, announced firm measures against online manipulation, stressing that Romania already used three types of advanced software to detect “false content”.

He said Romania applied strict European legislation and did not tolerate disinformation online.

Bogdan also pointed out there were mechanisms implemented at the global, European and national level to combat disinformation and manipulative content.

In a press release on March 13, education minister Daniel David said: “Freedom of expression can stand as long as it does not promote illegal content, as long as it does not attack human dignity, as long as it does not represent bullying.”

David also shared a guide on Combatting Illegal Content Online for teachers, parents, pupils, students “so that they understand what rights they have and how they can notice, for example, online content that is illegal and should be removed”.

This included incitement to hatred based on criteria including the level of education or social category, glorifying totalitarian regimes or denying their crimes, distributing false or misleading information about public health, elections, social crises, economic/banking crises to induce panic or influence public opinion.

David stressed: “Technology itself, including social media, is not a good or bad thing.”

He said freedom of expression was important “but in a democracy there are limits”.

“Likewise, we must have those limits on social networks, as we have in the physical world, nothing more.

“We don’t need to bureaucratise and become obsessive about control, but we also cannot accept that everything is permitted. At that point, we are no longer a society, we are no longer a democracy, we are a state and we are rather an anarchic group,” he said.

🇷🇴Online censorship in Romania goes into effect

The same people who have called Georgescu's supporters "uneducated extremist idiots" and called for their arrest/m#rder will now be removing content at their discretion

Anything can be labeled as extremist, or as disinformation.… pic.twitter.com/osEyL3uZa1

— iosefinapascal (@iosefinaoficial) March 13, 2025

On March 11, the government together with TikTok and Facebook announced “a partnership” to fight disinformation, focusing on quickly removing content.

On March 27, officials will conduct a test run simulating potential electoral scenarios to evaluate rapid intervention capabilities.

Although the measures reportedly would serve to protect citizens and the maintenance of a safe and transparent online environment, critics noted there was a major risk of abuse and censorship.

Romania pushed to address so-called illegal content, hate speech and manipulated information more aggressively after approving a bill in late February that introduced stricter regulations on social media platforms and online content providers.

While aligned with the European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA), Romania’s legislation went further in its restrictions.

Key features of the bill were speedy illicit content removal, with material deemed to be inciting violence, hate speech or disinformation on major national-interest topics to be removed within 15 minutes of publication, something which was not required under the DSA.

During this period, platforms would be expected to use algorithms, potentially AI-driven, to analyse and classify content.

For accounts registered or active in Romania, platforms must adjust algorithms to ensure “potentially harmful content”, broadly defined to include incitement to hatred, dangerous disinformation, or manipulation, did not reach more than 150 users.

Platforms would be barred from promoting such “potentially harmful content” linked to Romanian accounts.

Institutions including the Permanent Electoral Authority, the National Audiovisual Council, the Romanian Intelligence Service and even the Ministry of Defence will have the power to directly request the deletion of posts or the blocking of users’ access to them.

If State institutions validated more than 30 per cent of user reports of illegal or harmful content on a platform within 30 days of the law’s enactment, the provider would face heavy fines.

Additionally, Internet Service Providers (ISPs) failing to block designated “harmful” sites could face fines ranging from 10,000 to 50,000 lei (approximately €2,000 to €10,000).

The bill allowed authorities, including the National Audiovisual Council (CNA) and the National Authority for Management and Regulation in Communications (ANCOM), to order content removal or site blocking without prior independent judicial review in certain cases.

This meant that once content was blocked, affected users must take legal action to restore their posts — a lengthy court procedure that would likely continue until the original message’s relevance and impact had effectively disappeared.

Critics warned that with such a wide range of State institutions being able to request the direct removal of posts, there were strong concerns of possible political use or even abuse, especially regarding the elections.

They also noted the lack of clear, transparent and well-defined criteria on what constituted criticism, irony or contrary opinions.

The law was drafted and proposed in late February, with rapid movement through Romania’s legislative process.

It had gained traction despite concerns over foreign interference in the annulled 2024 presidential election. That was particularly linked to populist candidate Călin Georgescu’s TikTok success, which Romanian intelligence attributed to possible Russian influence.

Lawyers from CMS Law Now, a leading international law firm with 79 offices in more than 40 countries and more than 5,000 lawyers worldwide, warned it would be a challenge for providers required to implement mechanisms to detect and categorise potentially harmful content and remove identified illegal content within 15 minutes of publication.

They said that if other countries did not adopt similar rules, providers would have to either apply these stricter measures universally or develop separate mechanisms to identify and categorise content posted by and for users in Romania.

“While we understand the need for effective mechanisms to combat illegal content, we believe that the urgency imposed by this proposal, the strong reliance on AI, and the broad definition of ‘potentially harmful content’ could lead to errors and potentially infringe on freedom of expression,” they concluded.

https://brusselssignal.eu/2025/03/romania-targets-illegal-online-content-ahead-of-re-run-elections

In colonized Europe, Ramadan isn’t just for Muslims. The new population generously shares its culture with the natives, even as it displaces them, not only in Italy, but in Germany as well.

Via Allah’s Willing Executioners:

A letter from the Zuckmayer School in the Neukölln district of Berlin has caused displeasure among parents. Not only were the seventh-graders invited to take part in the Islamic fast-breaking (iftar), but attendance was also compulsory.

In Austria, woke educrats are not required to Islamize native kids:

More and more young children – some as young as primary school age – are abstaining from eating and drinking during lessons. … Vienna primary school unionist Thomas Krebs warned of the consequences: ‘Without sufficient hydration, physical education is hardly possible. In addition, many children suffer from poor concentration, hypoglycaemia and exhaustion – some literally fall over.’

Krebs says pupils pressure their peers to fast. Potentially outnumbered infidels could be in for a beating on the playground if they don’t go along.

Back to Italy, in Salorno, South Tyrol:

At the so-called ‘Iftar of Friendship’, schoolchildren were brought in to deal with the Islamic fasting month of Ramadan. ‘So while Muslim traditions are being promoted and integrated into the everyday lives of schoolchildren, we have been experiencing a worrying development in South Tyrol for years: out of a misguided sense of tolerance, traditional Christian festivals and celebrations – such as the St. Martin parade, St. Nicholas celebrations and Christmas parties – are increasingly being cancelled or watered down in kindergartens and schools,’ criticised Roland Stauder, Chairman of the Freedom Party, in a press release.

If Europeans can’t defend their own culture now, it will be extirpated quickly when inpouring and rapidly reproducing Muslims achieve a majority, just as cultures like Egypt’s were lost throughout the Midde East as Islam expanded.

Moonbattery Infidel Children Celebrate Ramadan in Europe – Moonbattery

Political correctness has now invaded even Florence’s iconic square, Piazza della Signoria, once home to Michelangelo’s magnificent David. Italian outlet Il Giornale reports that as of today, an almost four-metre-high statue of gilded bronze depicting a black girl will tower over the square. The statue, titled Time Unfolding, is the work of British sculptor Thomas J Price, and will remain on the Renaissance square until September as part of the ‘Thomas J Price in Florence’ project. 

Woke delirium in Florence where a statue of a black girl was installed in Piazza della Signoria to contrast the “Renaissance space devoted to male power” of Donatello's David, to “reflect on inclusivity” because “the ideal of classical beauty is a cage”.https://t.co/YNmXaTK0QV

— Francesco Giubilei (@giubileif) March 14, 2025

The reason behind the choice of the wonderful Italian square to display the somewhat bizarre work of art is that Piazza della Signoria “is a space devoted to male power,” which should be challenged and counterbalanced by a female figure. The issue with the other sculptures standing on the square, such as Donatello’s David, Benvenuto Cellini’s Perseus, and Baccio Bandinelli’s Hercules and Cacus, is apparently not only that they all represent males, but that all those men are also white.  

Activism obviously does not care for the fact that the figures immortalised by the statues (historical and mythological) are white by default and not by some patriarchal, toxicly masculine scheming: the indigenous people of ancient Rome and Greece happen to be white. 

But that does not count when it comes to “a higher purpose” and ideological considerations. According to the artist, the square needed a statue capable of “asking questions about the social, aesthetic and political hierarchies that guide our lives, ” as he put it in an interview with Italian liberal paper La Repubblica. According to Price, “the ideal of classical beauty is a model, but also a cage that still exists, so we internalize a value system ​​that does not put a black woman at the centre of a square.”

As Il Giornale points out, the whole reasoning is fundamentally flawed. Not only does it insist on the mistaken approach of viewing values and ideals of the past through the contemporary lens of wokeness, but it also relativises the concept of beauty. Not to mention, the paper adds, that in classical antiquity there are numerous sculptures dedicated to women both in Greco-Roman and Christian art.   

Price, a black man himself, has acquired some fame for his large-scale figurative sculptures and who, according to Ocula magazine, “combines Western sculptural traditions and contemporary materials to challenge the pervasive problems of the underrepresentation and misconception of Black people in the art world and in wider society.” He, however, does not seem to have many original ideas, apart from his woke activism, considering that he keeps exhibiting the exact same type of work wherever he is invited to do so. Back in 2023, he had created a statue called Moments Contained, which was exhibited outside the Central Station of Rotterdam also depicting a black woman, while in 2020 in London, he had exhibited the same black woman statue holding a cell phone in her hand. 

Il Giornale notes that Price’s artwork is also on display at the Museo Novecento in Florence as part of the project that aims to “reflect on inclusiveness, climate change and new forms of sustainability.”  According to a post advertising the exhibit on the social media channel of the museum, Price’s statue in Piazza della Signoria “challenges the traditional narratives of power and representation, creating a surprising contrast with the historical masterpieces that surround it.”

De gustibus non est disputandum, that is, “in matters of taste, there can be no disputes,” as the Latin maxim goes. Price’s art may or may not be of value, or to the liking of many. However, it is somewhat disconcerting that the leadership of the Florence municipality decided to erect the statue (albeit, mercifully, only temporarily) in one of the most beautiful town squares in the world. Shoving the progressive piece of art down the throats of its own residents and the large number of tourists who visit the beautiful Italian town not to be taught lessons in critical race theory and decolonization is nothing but an act of aggression. 

https://europeanconservative.com/articles/news/woke-sculpture-race-gender-florence-piazza-della-signoria/

Detectives investigating a potential Islamist terror attack in Northern Ireland said the suspect travelled from North Africa through Britain.

Specialist officers are probing the attack in Belfast on the evening of March 1, and are understood to be working towards the possibility the stabbing was motivated by religious terrorism.

An 18-year-old man was arrested after the stabbing near the Ormeau Road at around 7.35pm on March 1.

Police believe the offender was acting alone and not as part of a cell.

Assistant Chief Constable Davy Beck said: “The suspect was arrested on suspicion of wounding with intent to do grievous bodily harm and possession of an offensive weapon in a public place, before being detained for the purpose of assessment by mental health professionals.

“He remains in their care at this time. The victim, a 51-year-old man, received treatment in hospital and has since been discharged.

“He continues to receive support from specialist officers.

“While I would stress that the motive for the attack has not yet been established, detectives are exploring a number of potential motivating factors, including the possibility that this was a hate crime, a mental health episode or driven by religious ideology.”

He continued: “At this time, no other persons are being sought in connection with the attack.

“I urge anyone who was in the area at the time or may have information to contact us on 101.

“A report can also be made using the online reporting form via www.psni.police.uk/makeareport. Alternatively, information can be provided to Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555 111 or online.”

Local police teams are believed to be working closely with immigrant communities in the city amid concerns the incident could lead to heightened tensions, reports BelfastLive.

https://www.gbnews.com/news/belfast-news-potential-islamist-stabbing-suspect-travelled-north-africa-britain

By J.B. Shurk

Canada’s Liberal Party selected central banker Mark Carney to lead the country as prime minister.  He only recently became a politician, but already he’s sitting at the head of the class!  No worries, though.  He has the kind of résumé all globalists in good standing with Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum would envy.  He ran not only the Bank of Canada, but also the Bank of England.  He’s a central banker extraordinaire!  He loves printing funny money and manipulating markets.  Artificially created inflation is his jam, man!

Carney is the most recent iteration of the World Economic Forum’s standard operating procedure for captured governments (and Canada is most definitely WEF-captured): Whenever possible, put bankers in charge of those pesky territorial designations nostalgically known as nation-states.  France’s petit fromage, Emmanuel Macron, was a Rothschild & Co. investment banker.  Former U.K. prime minister Rishi Sunak was a Goldman Sachs and hedge fund guy.  Don’t be surprised when more transnational bankers seemingly come out of nowhere and immediately dominate the politics of other pseudo-sovereign countries.  Investment banking — and more specifically, central banking — is the lifeblood of globalism.  Why?  Because once a bank is big enough, it gambles with the futures of entire nations (and the millions of individual lives therein) as if they were mere poker chips.

So the globalist cabal claims another section of the world map!  Or retains its claim over Canada, I should say.  Everyone knows that soy-boy Justin Castreau (he cried during his farewell press conference, for Pete’s sake!) and his former deputy prime minister, Chrystia Freeland, call Herr Schwab “Daddy.”  Germany’s Dr. Evil makes a natural father figure for both Canucks.

Kooky Chrystia is that crazy-eyed woke-tard who promised to use nuclear weapons against the United States if President Trump imposes reciprocal tariffs and turns off the American money spigots that have long subsidized Canada’s socialist system.  She is a Canadian Karen not likely to go away.  I’m sure Daddy Klaus will give her another chance to scream, “I am womyn, hear me roar!” after central banker Mark Carney completes Canada’s transition to a “green energy”–reliant vassal state of the international money-printing guild.  When the draft dodgers, hippies, and Chinadians up north have gorged on enough of Carney’s WEF-style globalism for Reichsführer Schwab to deem the peasants sufficiently subjugated, he can install Chrystia as prime minister without any resistance.  Once in place and empowered to finish off what’s left of Trudeau and Carney’s castrated Canada, she will probably rename her censorship-loving slave state “Not-so-Freeland-ia” in honor of her favorite grandpa’s fascist proclivities.  

No wonder President Trump remains worried about the U.S.-Canada border.  King Charles III’s North American refuge has become a hornet’s nest of globalists, communists, and woke Nazis.  Perhaps after the southern wall is finished, the builders should hightail it up to the 49th parallel and get busy.  Forget the “global warming” malarkey.  A WEF-engineered winter is most definitely coming.

Of course, Canada is but one territory being pursued in the globalists’ board game of central bank Risk.  The WEF-ers are rolling the dice and capturing lands all over the planet.  

For three years, the United Kingdom, the European Union, and America’s very own CIA have all been yelling, “Ukraine!  Ukraine!  Ukraine!”  Hoity-toity Davos dandies demand in unison that non-Ukrainians die for the sacred honor of a country known for its vicious gangsters.  Given the Western euphoria for the place that spawned the noxious Tweedle-Vindmans, a naïve observer would erroneously assume that Ukraine must be a bastion of civic virtue and human rights — and not a nation that has outlawed opposition parties, free speech, dissent, religious freedom, and democratic elections.  How jolting it must be for the uninitiated to discover that Volodymyr Zelensky’s fiefdom is not renowned for its “democratic” norms, but is instead considered one of the most irredeemably corrupt crime dens in all of Europe.  If you’ve ever found yourself near any of Europe’s other troubled conflict zones, you know that a reputation for being the continent’s premier destination for depravity is not an easy distinction to claim.  Ukraine had to work hard for its deserved notoriety. 

No matter.  Klaus Schwab’s globalists are good at rebranding.  When money-printing central bankers fund USAID, and USAID pays Western journalists to run stories about the glorious nobility of Ukraine’s system of government, then the less informed among us eventually start spouting the same thing: Ukraine good.  Russia bad.  We make nuclear war now?  It’s not our fault that we humans can be programmed so easily.  We are biologically wired to trust people in positions of authority.

Here’s the problem: When all the people in positions of authority are either money-printing central bankers or propaganda-spewing espionage chiefs, then the people who die in wars (both soldiers and civilians) do so at the behest of thieves and liars.  Families should not sacrifice their children based on the promises of money-launderers and spies. 

For the jet-set crowd of Davos elites, preserving other people’s freedom is of no concern.  Creating debt slaves is good for their respective family businesses; liberating serfs so that the riffraff can express their low-class opinions is not.  Does anybody believe that the same European countries that regularly censor their own citizens and prevent unapproved political parties from holding power would have any interest in safeguarding the liberties of poor Ukrainians?  European elites (and American warmongers) see Ukrainians as cannon-fodder — which is why they say nothing as Zelensky’s goons abduct men off the street, press-gang them into service, and condemn them to be ripped to shreds.  

War is first and foremost about making money and expanding power.  Elites treat it like a “game” because they risk nothing.  Regular people pray for it to end because they risk everything.  

If the WEF-ers can’t prolong the War in Ukraine long enough to win back some valuable Black Sea coastline, they’ll just stir up trouble in one of the neighboring nations.  Take a look at the board game’s map.  Besides Russia, Ukraine, and Turkey, the region includes Moldova, Romania, Bulgaria, Greece, Armenia, and Georgia.  That’s strange.  Every country either on or near the Black Sea has recently experienced a spate of domestic conflicts, political rebellions, or outright civil wars.  In Romania, globalists not only annulled last year’s presidential election when the “wrong” candidate won, but also threw the winning candidate off this year’s ballot to prevent his repeat victory — all in the name of “protecting democracy”!  

Is there something toxic in the rivers draining into the Black Sea?  Or could it be that the West’s one-world-government zealots and intelligence agents/saboteurs are desperate to maintain influence over territories that could limit Russia’s strategic control of Black Sea trade routes and close off Russia’s access to the wider Mediterranean Sea?  

Perhaps disassembling Russia into a dozen separate WEF-conducive nations first requires WEF-enthusiasts to isolate Russia from half the world.  If they can avoid paying for the mess themselves by tricking the United States into sacrificing Americans in an unnecessary third world war, then all the better.  As they like to ask in Klaus Schwab’s neck of the woods, why fight the Russians or the Americans when you can get them to fight each other?  Cannon fodder does not discriminate by nationality.

If Western-style “democracy” means that central bankers control domestic policy, stifle dissent, and decide when war is “profitable,” then perhaps citizens should start asking who the hell put them in charge.  It certainly wasn’t the people.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/03/globalist_games_they_play_we_pay.html

One of the largest German-language anti-globalist TV stations has been debanked and is at risk of being shut down.

The TV and news outlet AUF1 had its bank account in Hungary shut down after it had already been debanked in Germany and in Austria.

AUF1 founder and editor-in-chief Stefan Magnet asked his viewers for help in a video message.

Magnet said this most recent censorship attack “could mean the end of Auf1” since its only remaining bank account in Hungary will be closed on May 1, and it may not be able to afford to be without an account to receive donations for several weeks.

“ The attacks against Auf1 are part of an overarching globalist agenda,” Magnet stated, adding that the globalists just waited for the elections in the U.S., Austria, and Germany to pass in order to launch this assault.

“Since those in power know that they are ruling against a relevant part of their own people and trampling on democracy – keyword Romania and EU dictatorship – they have to get rid of all those critics who expose their machinations.”

”AUF1 reaches millions of people with its program; over 300,000 follow us on Telegram alone. The system knows our reach, and they have not forgotten that we, together with the street resistance, overturned the coronavirus vaccination mandate in Austria and thus prevented worse things from happening in Germany and Switzerland,” he continued.

Magnet cited WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, who said in a speech in 2024 that the public health establishment needs to be “more aggressive in pushing back on anti-vaxxers,” as proof that the deep state is going after them.

“ New health emergency states are coming. They need them to sell their dozens of new mRNA vaccine products. Does anyone still believe that the pharmaceutical industry will create gigantic production facilities without already preparing the sales market for them?” he warned.

subscribe to our daily headlines US Canada Catholic

“There is the threat of the Great Reset expropriation and, above all, the threat of war,” the AUF1 founder said.

“ Because they cannot compete with us legally or professionally, they want to cut off our funding by constantly closing our bank accounts.”

He said that AUF1 tried to open other bank accounts, but “dozens of banks have systematically turned us down.”

“And so it is almost impossible that we will have a new alternative account for our donations by the beginning of May,” Magnet continued. “Being without a donation account for a few weeks could very quickly spell the end for us because, as you know, unlike the state-funded media, which always agitates so passionately against AUF1, we do not receive any corporate or state funding.”

“As of May 1, we will be without a donations account.”

“After that, the Hungarian account will be closed for good with a short grace period. By supporting us now, you will help us to parry this unexpected attack until we have regrouped.”

“According to the globalists’ schedule, AUF1 should no longer exist this summer. If AUF1 falls, many other alternative media outlets will also fall,” he warned. “Then they will go after the political parties that can’t be brought back in line. And then they will come directly after you.”

AUF1 is an anti-globalist online TV and news station founded by Magnet in 2021 in Austria during the height of the COVID crisis. In short order, AUF1 garnered substantial reach and viewership in the German-speaking market. Financed by donations, AUF1 has grown its enterprise despite numerous attacks and attempts to shut down its operation.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/major-german-language-anti-globalist-tv-station-debanked-faces-shutdown/?utm_source=most_recent&utm_campaign=usa

Germany’s Left Party leader Jan van Aken has sparked controversy after suggesting that politically left-wing crimes can be justified if they serve the public good, whereas right-wing crimes cannot.

In an interview with Swiss newspaper Neue Zürcher Zeitung (NZZ), Van Aken defended his own past breach of secrecy laws, arguing that “sometimes you have to cross borders to protect the general public.”

Van Aken was questioned about his role in leaking confidential government documents in 2016 related to the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) negotiations between the United States and the European Commission. At the time, as a member of the Bundestag, he smuggled a hidden camera into a classified reading room, filmed the documents, and handed them over to Greenpeace. The disclosure helped turn public opinion against TTIP, which was later abandoned.

With the offenses now statute-barred, meaning time has run out for legal proceedings to be brought, van Aken openly admitted to his actions, defending them as necessary to prevent what he saw as a threat to consumer protection and workers’ rights. When asked whether a right-wing politician, such as a member of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, should also be allowed to break the law for reasons of conscience, van Aken firmly rejected the idea.

“Anyone who excludes others and steps down does not serve the common good,” he stated, implying that left-wing offenses could be morally justified while right-wing ones could not. When pressed on whether criminal law applies differently to leftists and right-wingers, he insisted, “The law applies equally to everyone. Only sometimes you have to cross borders to protect the general public.”

Beyond his stance on political crimes, van Aken also weighed in on Germany’s immigration policies, arguing that the arrival of over two million refugees in the past decade is entirely manageable if municipalities receive adequate funding.

“Germany has already taken in more than one million refugees twice. Certainly, there were also problems, but the core issue is underfunded municipalities,” he said.

He also made controversial remarks about billionaires, calling them a “danger to democracy” and claiming that no one earns immense wealth fairly.

“No one works so hard or is so smart that he would have earned a million an hour. They only have the money because they have taken it away from others — either by paying wages that were too low or charging prices that were too high,” van Aken stated.

Additionally, he accused Elon Musk of buying X to help bring right-wing parties to power, adding to a long-running debate about the influence of billionaires in politics. He didn’t, however, make any reference to billionaires like George Soros who have spent a considerable amount of their wealth on funding left-wing NGOs and left-wing parties across the Western world under the guise of “defending democracy.”

Left-wing crimes can serve the common good, but right-wing crimes should always be punished, claims Germany’s Left Party leader

Reduxx has learned that a registered sex offender was amongst a small group of trans activists who recently protested outside of a San Francisco spa and demanded access to clothing-optional female-only events. Dwight Austin, who began calling himself Dakota Rose Austin in 2022, was interviewed sympathetically by the media as a victim of the spa’s “discriminatory” policies.

As previously reported by Reduxx, a group of trans activists gathered at the entrance of a Russian-style bathhouse on the shores of the San Francisco Bay to protest their sex-segregated events. The spa holds nights where only males or only females are allowed into the clothing-optional facility on the basis that practitioners of certain religions prohibit the unclothed mixing of the sexes.

The demonstration was organized after one trans-identified male who calls himself Breath Mormorer claimed he was a victim of “transphobia.” Mormorer said Archimedes’ staff told him he would have to remain clothed at all times if he wanted to attend the female-only night.

Trans activists in San Francisco are protesting outside of a nude spa after a trans-identified male was told he could not be naked during a female-only event.

Breath Mormorer is accusing the spa of "prejudice and hate."https://t.co/1qPKLqlphb

— REDUXX (@ReduxxMag) March 5, 2025

The protest was featured on local news, where Austin was interviewed by reporter Kelsi Thorud.

“As Latinos, as trans, as queer, as African American, the fear is turned now. If you weaponize DEI and affirmative action and all these other things that were a benefit of everyone in America and you weaponize them against us, now I’m in fear,” Austin said. He was also featured in a number of other articles, quoted as being a trans activist.

However, despite professing to be living in “fear,” Reduxx has learned that Austin is listed on California’s state registry as a level 4 sex offender, according to a 2022 risk assessment. The ranking positions Austin as a moderate to high risk, with an “above average risk” of reoffending. The crime which saw Austin placed on the registry: rape by force or fear.

Within the same year as his sex offender high risk designation, Dwight Austin began calling himself Dakota Rose and utilizing multiple social media accounts in a bid to become a prominent trans activist, and quickly racked up like-minded followers.

One high profile account to have followed Austin on Instagram is another trans-identified male, Suzanne Ford, the Executive Director of San Francisco Pride.

According to his most recent Facebook profile, Austin has been canvassing for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). In recent years the ACLU has filed dozens of lawsuits across the United States in defense of male criminals who claim to be transgender. In many cases, trans-identified male convicts represented by the ACLU in human rights complaints have been sex offenders and violent killers.

After the initial boycott started, Archimedes Banya issued a statement claiming that they stood by the “diversity of the Bay Area,” and wanted to respect both their “commitment to inclusivity” and the needs of religious and cultural communities who require sex-segregated spaces.

As such, they announced the introduction of two different events: an Inclusive Women’s Night, which they described as “open to all individuals who identify as women,” and a Cultural and Religious Women’s Night, which they state is “designed to provide a space that aligns with the needs of women from religious or cultural backgrounds who observe practices requiring a female-only environment based on sex assigned at birth.”

Sieh dir diesen Beitrag auf Instagram an

Ein Beitrag geteilt von Archimedes Banya (@banyasf)

In response to criticism, Archimedes Banya posted a statement to social media which argued that women are entitled to a “phallus-free” environment.

“We have seen messages claiming that cis women don’t deserve space, that asking for a phallus-free environment is inherently hateful, and that any separation is an act of exclusion. That is categorically not true,” read the statement.

“The request for a phallic-free space is not about exclusion, it is about recognizing that some members of our community experience a different reaction to that part of the human body. Whether that reaction is based on personal history, trauma, cultural or religious beliefs, or simply comfort, it is valid.”

However, trans activists continued to demand full access to spa facilities where women are undressing or in the nude, and the facility was inundated with one-star reviews online, leading to Yelp suspending users’ ability to rate the spa.

Sieh dir diesen Beitrag auf Instagram an

Ein von @transvisible_ geteilter Beitrag

In a statement, the Human Rights Commission said it recognized that the bathhouse’s policy change came “at a time when transgender and non-binary people are facing a barrage of attacks, and we want to be clear that the City and County of San Francisco is committed to ensuring that transgender people are protected from unlawful discrimination.”

As a result, Archimedes Banya had no choice but to comply with their demands or engage in a litigation. In California, it is against the law to discriminate based on self-declared “gender identity,” and this extends to access to sex-segregated facilities, such as restrooms, locker rooms, and showers.

On social media, Mormorer, who led the demonstration against Archimedes Banya alongside Austin, has been boasting about forcing the spa to comply with their demands.

If the trans contingent including Austin is permitted to participate in the female-only events, it will represent the second time a sex offender was granted access to the women’s section of a nude spa.

In 2021, a Korean spa in California made international headlines after a trans-identified sex offender had been granted access to the women’s facilities in accordance with California state law.

Wi Spa, a jjimjilbang-style establishment in Los Angeles was the subject of viral attention after a video recorded by a female patron began circulating on social media. In the video, the woman confronts spa staff because of a nude male who was exposing himself in front of women and girls in the women’s changing room.

The incident was initially dismissed as a “transphobic” hoax by progressive commentators, but would later be verified by police who issued a warrant for the arrest of Darren Agee Merager, a registered sex offender. Merager was arrested in December of 2022.

https://reduxx.info/exclusive-trans-activist-demanding-access-to-female-only-nude-sauna-is-high-risk-registered-sex-offender/