A group of over 30 MEPs has called on European Parliament president Roberta Metsola to invite billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk to address a Plenary session. In a letter, signed by representatives of mainly conservative and nationalist parties, the MEPs describe the X owner as “a trailblazer in the digital revolution,” and that his insights “could make the EU a hub of creativity and technological advancement, again.”
40 MEPs representing the @Europarl_ENpolitical majority and the European Nations support inviting @elonmusk to discuss freedom of speech, conservative values and technological success, so to Make Europe Great Again!@velopky@visegrad24pic.twitter.com/zgV5UdxYNz
— FRAGKOS EMMANOUIL FRAGKOULIS MEP🇬🇷 (@e_fragkos) January 15, 2025
The invitation comes as Musk’s frequent interventions in European politics are sending EU elites into a spin. Earlier this month, the billionaire live-streamed a conversation with Alice Weidel, leader of Germany’s right-wing Alternative für Deutschland (AfD), on his platform X. During the talk, Musk endorsed the AfD, calling it “Germany’s only hope for renewal.” While his support sparked outrage among EU officials and liberal MEPs, it was celebrated by AfD supporters who have long been excluded from mainstream media platforms.
The European Commission dispatched 150 officials to monitor the livestream, claiming it risked violating the Digital Services Act. Leftist and liberal MEPs even labelled the conversation a “threat to democracy” and called for tighter regulation of Musk’s platform. Some went as far as suggesting the livestream could constitute an illegal party donation—despite the fact that mainstream parties regularly receive extensive media coverage.
The reaction to Musk’s engagement with European politics, particularly his endorsement of the AfD, exposes what columnist Sabine Beppler-Spahl called the “authoritarian tendencies of the elite.” Writing foreuropeanconservative.com, she argued, “The establishment’s fear of Musk reveals its deeper fear of the electorate”:
This narrative reflects a persistent and problematic anti-populist assumption: that voters are passive objects, easily swayed by ‘demagogues’ rather than acting on their own political judgment.
Italian PM Giorgia Meloni also recently pointed out the hypocrisy of liberals and leftists who complain about the influence of Musk while supporting the efforts of people like George Soros.
The problem is when wealthy people use their resources to finance parties, associations and political exponents all over the world to influence the political choices of nation-states. That’s not what Musk is doing. This, for example, is what George Soros does.
The tensions between Musk and EU regulators are nothing new. In 2024, he revealed that the European Commission had offered X a secret deal to censor content, which he refused.
The invitation to Musk highlights the growing divide in European politics between those advocating for free speech and innovation and those entrenched in the bureaucratic orthodoxy of Brussels. Whether or not the invitation is accepted, it symbolises a broader pushback against what many see as an elite unwilling to trust citizens to make their own political decisions.
Simon Danczuk was the Labour MP for Rochdale, one of the towns most severely affected by the grooming gang scandal. He joins #NCFWhittle to discuss what he knows about the cover up and why Labour politicians did it.
Multicultural enrichment is shared with great extroversion in countries whose native populations have been slated for ethnocide via demographic displacement.
In France, a garrulous guy came up to somebody filling his car at a gas station:
He demanded of his victim, a 20-year-old man from Paris, ‘Give me your car or I’ll cut your throat’. The stranger escalated his threat by saying: ‘This is my battle today’ and that he was ready to ‘blow up the petrol station’, according to a police source. He then began reciting suras from the Quran and shouting ‘Allahu akbar’.
The sura reciter is described as a “30-year-old from Versailles.”
In Germany, train passengers were enriched with Islamic prayers:
On Intercity Express 821 (Essen – Munich), a train attendant drew the attention of two officers from the Bavarian state police to a man displaying unusual behaviour. The 17-year-old German was harassing fellow travellers, including by means of Islamic prayers. When approached, the native Rhinelander behaved extremely uncooperatively. Instead of identifying himself and showing a ticket, he shouted loudly and jumped onto a table in the compartment. In the subsequent attempt to calm him down and stop his behaviour, he physically attacked the two officers, spat at them, insulted them and slightly injured them.
The native Rhinelander temporarily escaped, but cops found him outside Starnberg station…
…kneeling in the bushes. In a prayer position, he played music or prayer-like recordings on a mobile phone.
They don’t make native Rhinelanders like they used to.
But wait, he couldn’t be a native German — because there is no such thing. The word “biodeutsch” has been deleted from the German Newspeak Dictionary:
The term biodeutsch constructs a racist, biological form of nationality. … In this way, ‘being German’ is justified via an appeal to nature for the purpose of demarcating and devaluing Germans with a migration background. biodeutsch and the associated nouns … are in line with other words such as “passport German” and “authentic German,” which serve to ascribe unequal characteristics to groups of people who are equal before the law, thus classifying them hierarchically. This division into supposedly “real” Germans and second-class Germans that goes hand in hand with the use of biodeutsch is a form of everyday racism.
That is, to suggest there is such thing as a German in any meaningful sense is racist and therefore verboten.
It is possible that the protagonists of the stories above actually are French and German. Not likely though.
Petra Steger, a leading MEP for the Austrian Freedom Party (FPÖ), has provoked an EU firestorm about censorship and freedom of speech with her calls to abolish the Digital Services Act.
The EU should repeal the legislation “as quickly as it has been introduced”, she said January 16.
“With the DSA the enemies of free speech in Brussels have created an ideologically motivated instrument of censorship”, added Steger.
Steger may have touched a nerve, as on January 17, hard-right Reconquête MEP Sara Knafo warned about growing “strong freedom-restricting tendencies” across Europe, in a January 16 interview.
“There’s a growing sense of panic in our public debate and regulatory frameworks, leading to more laws and restrictions,” cautioned Knafo.
Restrictions on freedom of speech “starts with targeting hateful speech, then censoring misinformation, and eventually spirals into algorithmic control,” she added.
The fight for freedom of expression was fundamental, as it formed the basis for all other freedoms, Knafo argued.
“Freedom of expression is fundamental because it underpins all other freedoms,” said the French MEP.
“How can one defend their right to own property or any other liberty if they are denied the right to speak?” she asked.
Knafo also cited media regulator Arcom’s 2024 decision to remove the conservative channel C8 from French broadcast television as an example of restrictions on freedom of speech across Europe.
She criticised proposals to categorise journalists by their political opinions, calling these “alarming developments.”
Steger’s calls to end the DSA came in response to reports the EU was considering increasing its probes into US technology giants Apple, Google, and Meta.
She welcomed increased pressure on the EU from incoming US President Donald Trump.
“Trump has realised that terms like ‘disinformation’ and ‘hate speech’ are being abused as instruments for a brutal supervision of the internet and the suppression of undesirable opinions”, she said.
Stefer heavily criticised former EU commissioner Thierry Breton, one of the driving forces behind the DSA.
Breton’s recent comments on repeating Romanian presidential elections were “antidemocratic”, she said.
Some see EU intervention in the Romanian elections “as a role model for other elections,” when the EU “is no defender of democracy but in truth its biggest enemy,” she added.
Steger, who was second on the FPÖ’s list of MEPs in the 2024 European Parliament election, is daughter of former FPÖ vice chancellor Norbert Steger.
Other Austrian parties in the European Parliament responded by defending the DSA.
Romania’s example showed how dangerous disinformation campaigns could be, and that the DSA was “urgently necessary” for democracy, said Reinhold Lopatka, head of the Austrian People’s Party delegation.
Social Democratic MEP Elisabeth Grossman called the DSA “our most important instrument to fight hatred and misinformation online and protect our democracy”.
Helmut Brandstätter, an MEP for the liberal Neos party, said it was strange the FPÖ had not protested when Russia meddled in other countries’ elections, “be it in Moldova or Romania”.
Steger said these vehement reactions proved she was right. “They do not want to moderate the debate, they want to control it and if need be forbid it altogether,” Steger told Austrian media.
The Digital Services Act, an EU regulation adopted in 2022, imposes new rules on large online platforms (ones with over 45 million users) and search engines, and claims to combat disinformation and illegal content.
Critics have argued its focus on preventing the spread of disinformation and harmful content could undermine freedom of speech. A bipartisan group of US senators criticised the DSA for focussing on US companies, while ignoring similar companies based in China or Russia.
On today’s #NCFNewspeak, NCF Director Peter Whittle, Senior Fellows Dr. Philip Kiszely and Rafe Heydel-Mankoo and Amy Gallagher of Stand up to Woke discuss: * Labour’s Betrayal of the victims of the Grooming Gang Scandal * The legacy of Joe Biden and what to expect from a Trump Presidency * British taxpayers to pay compensation to Gerry Adams and alleged IRA terrorists?
In recent days, mainstream media and social media have been circulating exaggerated claims about an imminent U.S. invasion of… Greenland! These absurdities are based on statements by Donald Trump expressing his interest in this overseas territory of the Kingdom of Denmark—a U.S. ally and a founding member of NATO. The penny-a-line journalists and their followers, lacking humor and perceptive ability, genuinely believe that such a possibility exists. Even Danish officials have commented on these absurdities.
But what is really happening? Are people so naive as to truly believe that the U.S. will invade Greenland? Or are they afraid of something else?
The truth is that Denmark has many valid reasons to fear the resurgence of a separatist movement in Greenland. The otherwise peaceful and democratic Scandinavians subjected the inhabitants of Greenland to inhumane torture, humiliation, child abductions, forced sterilizations, and rapes. And we are not talking about centuries ago, but just a few years ago. So the memories of the Inuit who endured the horrors of Danish colonialists first-hand remain painfully vivid.
It was only in the second half of the 20th century that at least three official programs from the Kingdom of Denmark came to light, each of which violated the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in Resolution 260 (III) A on December 9th, 1948.
The first official social experiment program was the “Little Danes” experiment in 1951, during which 22 Inuit children from Greenland were sent to foster families in Denmark to be re-educated as “little Danes.” Although the children were supposed to be orphans, most were not but were forcibly taken from their families. Six were adopted while in Denmark, while the rest returned to Greenland and were placed in orphanages where they spoke Danish. The experiment had severe consequences for the children, with half facing mental health issues and half dying at a young age. The Danish government never showed remorse for this Soviet-style experiment until it officially apologized in 2020.
Beyond the abuse of Inuit children, Danish law until 1974 considered children of unmarried Greenlandic women who had been raped by Danish settlers as juridisk faderløse (legally fatherless). These children had no right to know or inherit their biological fathers, effectively protecting Danish men from responsibilities towards their children in Greenland, creating a form of racial segregation. Not until 2014 did Denmark overturn these provisions, giving children the right to claim paternity and inheritance from their fathers.
In addition to social experiments, child abductions, abuse, and apartheid-like legislation, Denmark also implemented population control programs in Greenland. The Spiralkampagnen was a birth control campaign conducted by the Danish government in Greenland during the 1960s and 1970s. As part of this campaign, Danish doctors implanted intrauterine devices (IUDs) in thousands of Inuit girls and women, often without their consent. The campaign aimed to reduce the birth rate in Greenland. During the first five years of the campaign, about half of the women of childbearing age in Greenland had IUDs implanted. The Spiralkampagnen had serious consequences for affected women and girls, many of whom had not given consent or were not properly informed.
From the above, one can conclude that the long-suffering Inuit people have endured much inhumane treatment from the Danes, justifying any thoughts of Greenland’s independence or annexation to another state. This is precisely what Europeans fear—and why they take Trump’s comments seriously.
If the ’democratic’ Danes were at peace with their conscience, they would take Trump’s proposal for Greenland’s annexation to the U.S. as a joke. However, given their deep understanding of the extent of oppression, humiliation, and exploitation endured by native Greenlandic Inuit over so many years, they fear the potential for an independence campaign through a referendum. Although the 2009 law allows for a referendum in Greenland, Denmark’s Constitution requires parliamentary ratification. In any case, even if Parliament rejected a potential popular demand for Greenland’s independence, the social impacts would be incalculable.
Donald Trump is well-versed in geopolitics, Arctic issues, and security. Despite mainstream media’s attempts to portray him comically, his strategic moves and targeted statements reveal a different aspect. It remains to be seen what developments are triggered by his exploratory statements as President-elect. For now, however, Greenlanders take them seriously.
Content Notice: This article contains graphic details from a trial related to the sexual abuse of a young child. Some readers may find the content disturbing. Reader discretion is appreciated.
A trans-identified male in Australia has been sentenced to just over 4 years in prison for the horrific sexual abuse of his own 5-year-old daughter. While the offender was given the pseudonym of “Hilary Maloney” by the court, Reduxx can exclusively reveal the pedophile as Autumn Tulip Harper.
Reduxx has chosen to withhold Harper’s male birth name in order to protect the identity of the victim.
Harper, 25, was first identified as a suspect in the production of vile child sexual abuse content after an American pedophile he had been communicating with was arrested in September of 2023. A forensic examination of the pedophile’s devices found that Harper had sent him pornographic images and videos of a young girl via Discord. After identifying Harper as the owner of the account the content had originated from, police in the United States notified Australian authorities of their findings.
On September 15, 2023, police raided Harper’s home in Clayton South, Victoria, and seized his electronic devices. An examination of his cellphone found he had produced 77 files categorized as child abuse material between May and June of 2023. The female child in the materials was identified as Harper’s own 5-year-old daughter.
“Autumn Harper” in 2019.
According to court records, Harper had been in an online BDSM relationship with the American pedophile, who encouraged him to sexually abuse his daughter in exchange for words of validation.
Harper sent the other man a range of images of his daughter, including of her naked, in the shower, and of him sexually posing with her. The court also details there were several videos of Harper kissing the child’s labia, naked buttocks, and licking her anal region. In one of these videos, Harper is heard asking the girl if she “likes it” to which the child clearly responds “no.”
From an analysis of the video and photo evidence, police determined that Harper had directly sexually abused the girl on at least 19 separate occasions in the course of just one month. The sexual abuse media was exclusively sent to the American, who Harper viewed as his “Master.” The man would then heap praise upon Harper, telling him how “impressed” and aroused he was by him, and calling him a “good girl.”
Despite being arrested for the serious crime in September of 2023, Harper was released on bail and was allowed to remain free throughout the duration of the trial.
Harper had shared custody of his daughter with his ex-partner, who only learned of the abuse after police notified her. In a victim impact statement, she spoke of the profound emotional toll the abuse had taken on her daughter, and stated that the child had begun inexplicably “acting out” around the same time the abuse would have started.
“Looking back, the behavioral issues all started from around the time that you were doing these things to her,” the girl’s mother said in court. “I’ve been through a lot in my life but this is the worst thing that’s ever happened to me. To have a child with someone and have your trust in them, even after breaking up and co-parenting, and then find out they’ve done these things … I am just constantly in fear, thinking if her own father could do this to her, what stops a stranger from doing the same? This has completely ruined my trust in others.”
During the trial, forensic psychiatrist Dr. Rajan Darjee was called upon to interview Harper and create a profile of his offending. Disturbingly, Darjee framed Harper as though he were a “female” who had been “pressured” by a male into committing the offenses.
“… This pattern of sexual abuse is one which a more dominant male pressurises, manipulates and/or coerces a female who has access to a child, usually her own, to sexually abuse that child and/or to make that child available to him to sexually abuse,” Darjee wrote in his report to the court, characterizing Harper as though he were a “mother” experiencing dire circumstances.
“Autumn Harper” in 2019.
Referring to Harper using feminine pronouns, Darjee wrote: “She felt the man she connected with cared for and was nice to her, and due to her low self-esteem, lack of assertiveness, loneliness, submissiveness and desperation to be noticed and cared for, it was easy for him to pick up on her vulnerability and manipulate her into the master/slave relationship where he took control of her life. He then involved her in sexual exchanges and then coerced her to sexually abuse her daughter and take videos and photos to share with him. She was not inherently motivated by deviant sexual interests or any other motive, except doing what he told her and keeping him happy, to sexually abuse her daughter.”
Darjee told the court that Harper would not need any “specific interventions to prevent further sexual offending” and dismissed the need for sex offender treatment. He also denied that Harper had a paraphilic disorder, and argued that Harper had no sexual attraction to children.
Darjee further described Harper as “hormonally female” at the time of his offending.
From the sentencing ruling against Autumn Harper.
Harper was represented by Isabelle Skaburskis, who identified herself as “Mx. Skaburskis” to the court. Notably, the defense claimed that Harper had “identified as female” since 2019, but photos of Harper from that year show he had a notably masculine appearance at that time.
Reduxx has also been made aware through a source close to the case that Harper had initially been charged under his birth name, suggesting that he only changed his legal identification during the course of the proceedings. Due to his criminal circumstances, he likely would have had to apply for explicit permission to pursue the change from the Secretary of the Justice Department.
Delivering the sentence on August 26, 2024, Judge Nola Karapanagiotidis highlighted Harper’s “gender dysphoria” and experiences with “transphobia” as mitigating factors, and appeared to accept the defense’s argument that he only committed the abuse to be “validated … as a woman and a sexual person.”
From the sentencing ruling against Autumn Harper.
Judge Karapanagiotidis reviewed Harper’s “personal circumstances” prior to announcing the sentence, emphasizing that Harper’s mother had been “homophobic and hateful” during his upbringing, and disapproved of his early attempts to wear women’s clothing. She also noted that his ex-partner, the mother of the victim, had not fully validated his gender identity after he expressed it.
“Compounding matters, you had only started to transition in around 2021 and your gender identity was not fully accepted by those around you, including [ex-partner]. Your Counsel submits that at the relevant time you were ‘completely lacking connection in [your] life’ and were experiencing ‘pervasive feelings of rejection and lack of self-worth,’” the Judge stated.
Harper was ultimately sentenced to 4 years and 9 months imprisonment, a steep drop from the maximum 25 year sentence that was available. Prior to delivering the decision, Judge Karapanagiotidis noted that the sentence was lenient, noting: “the sentence that I am about to impose on this charge is lower than the standard sentence.”
He will be eligible for parole just 2 years and 6 months into his sentence.
AfD (Alternative for German) co-head Alice Weidel has vowed to “hold accountable” the people who enforced the draconian COVID regime and have caused “many vaccine deaths” and serious side effects.
Weidel recently spoke on an X Spaces with Elon Musk, who endorsed her party, stating that “only AfD can save Germany.”
During a party event held at the town hall in Hamburg, Weidel gave a speech in which she addressed the draconian COVID policies imposed in Germany.
“There have been so many vaccine deaths and people with vaccine side effects; for those people alone, I would like to see responsibility taken,” she said.
“You can’t make amends for that, but you can ask for forgiveness, and we can also forgive. But hiding and putting down opinions is something else, and I promise you this here today: This is something that we, as Alternative for Germany, will go after and hold these people accountable if they don’t take responsibility themselves.”
Weidel said that the mRNA shots were suddenly presented as the only alternative even though they were “highly experimental.”
The politician also stated that the government did not just make “mistakes” but purposefully lied about COVID and the jabs, as leaked documents from the top German health agency, the Robert Koch Institute, have showed.
She announced that the AfD would initiate a parliamentary COVID investigation committee if her party reached the required 25 percent of the vote at the upcoming election.
The AfD leader said that there were still house searches being carried out by police of doctors who were critical of the mainstream COVID narrative. She compared the current German state, along with near-total conformity of all mainstream media outlets, with socialist East Germany.
Weidel thanked the people who took to the streets to protest the government’s draconian COVID policies and all the doctors and medical professionals who opposed the regime.
During the time of COVID, the AfD was the only party in Germany that unanimously opposed the government’s draconian policies, including an attempt to introduce a COVID shot mandate for people over the age of 60.
Austria’s probable next Chancellor: FPO’s Herbert Kickl. Foto: FPÖ
The coalition negotiations in Austria that are poised to lead to a right-wing Freedom Party-led government seem to be doing well, with the partners showing progress in the negotiation of a budget.
And, what’s more, there are clear signs that Freedom Party (FPO) and conservative People’s Party (OVP) have devised a great way to save money: scrapping failed climate-change-related measures!
It’s also under consideration to collect more dividends from state-owned companies, according to them.
Reuters reported:
“The two parties, in coalition talks for just six days, held a news conference giving first details of how they would save 6.39 billion euros ($6.58 billion), an amount they had announced on Monday, to bring the budget deficit back within EU limits.”
Euroskeptic FPO was the most voted in September’s parliamentary election with around 29%.
But before the victors could attempt a coalition, they had to wait for a establishment ‘coalition of losers’ to fail first.
“One of the biggest items in their plan would be to save nearly 2 billion euros by eliminating the so-called ‘climate bonus’, a payout of hundreds of euros a year to each taxpayer intended to redistribute proceeds from carbon-emissions-based taxation introduced by the outgoing OVP-Greens coalition.”
There are other no-nonsense approaches to cutting expenses, like a billion Euros saved by cutting spending on media advertising and political appointees.
“FPO budget spokesman Hubert Fuchs said 430 million euros would be raised from dividends from stakes in companies held by the state, beyond the amount that the government would ordinarily expect to collect.”
The coalition also aims to save 65 million euros by ending an exemption on car insurance tax for electric cars.
“’There are roughly 200,000 electric cars in Austria. They benefit from almost 600 million euros in subsidies in total from various sources. Some of those are tax breaks that we believe are unfair and inappropriate, and we have therefore decided to act accordingly’, Fuchs said.”
They will also end the tax exemption for solar-panel installations and will levy a new tax on power and energy companies’ windfall profits.
Yes, respect for nature is ALSO a form of civilisation…
Here too, the trade in small birds is part of their culture, the birds that, fortunately for us, live with us. Songbirds are among the first victims of the illegal trade in France. A goldfinch can be traded on the black market for 300 euros each. If it is a good songbird, it can cost several thousand euros.
A smuggler who had repeatedly committed offences, who was granted the right to remain in France and wanted to sell this bird, which is protected by OUR law, at the Flea Market in Marseille, was caught. He wanted to sell goldfinches at the flea market in Marseille: Man sentenced to one year’s probation.
He wanted to sell goldfinches at the flea market in Marseille: A man is sentenced to one year's probation.
‘An Algerian man was sentenced to one year's probation in Marseille on Tuesday for trafficking goldfinches, a protected bird species. The accused had already been arrested in November 2024 in possession of 53 birds, which were sold for between 150 and 300 euros.
The accused, who was subject to an obligation to leave the country, had been arrested on Sunday at the flea market in Marseille in possession of 41 goldfinches in cages hidden in large shopping bags. The confiscated birds were handed over by the French Biodiversity Agency to a specialist who was able to look after them. The specialist released them on Monday, but two birds were already dead.
The city police had already apprehended the man on the 17th of November 2024 in possession of 53 birds, which, as he explained at the time, he had offered for sale for 150 to 300 euros. He was released at the time.
The man denied having traded in birds on Sunday and asserted that he did not comprehend his arrest. In court, he explained that he had only been at the flea market to have a coffee.
The League for the Protection of Birds (LPO), which appeared as a co-plaintiff and was awarded 10,000 euros in damages, expressed its concern in court about the number of birds on sale on Sunday, whereas the police usually confiscate less than a dozen goldfinches.
Céline Bronzani, defence lawyer for the LPO, spoke of an ‘important protection issue’ and recalled that the population of goldfinches in the Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur (Paca) region had declined by 52% in a decade between 2001 and 2012.
This plague also exists in the form of nets that stretch for kilometres in the Maghreb and Egypt, destroying small passerines caught in their flight. Depending on the species, they are either caught for their song or for consumption. I outlined this in an article almost exactly a year ago, and of course our political escrologists are silent on this aspect of the decline of our passerines (they are the same ones that fly in and out of the Mediterranean):
