Month: December 2024

In mid-November, schools in the department of Aisne received a letter prohibiting them from displaying Advent calendars in classrooms on the grounds that they were part of a ‘religious commitment’. The senator of the Aisne department, Pierre-Jean Verzeulen (Les Indépendants), decided to strike back in the face of this new Christianophobic offensive.

A fortnight ago, the directors of public schools in a district in the south of the Aisne department received a letter signed by an inspector from the Académie. The letter contained a clear message: Advent calendars are no longer welcome in the department’s schools. Teachers who decorate their classrooms or rely on the calendar celebrating the birth of Jesus Christ will be called to order by their superiors. I have been made aware of the possible presence of Advent calendars in the classrooms,’ reads the letter sent to Valeurs actuelles. I would like to remind you that Advent is a religious custom: Within the framework of neutrality, which secularism prescribes as a fundamental value of the Republic, I call on you to remind school teachers that no pupil may be confronted with an Advent calendar in a school setting.’ After the controversy surrounding nativity scenes in public places, the inspector implies that the Advent calendar violates secularism and de facto puts pupils in trouble. In a touch of benevolence, the inspector even asks to be informed about any calendars that still exist ‘so that [he] can look after the teacher concerned’. A suffering person?

Pierre-Jean Verzelen (Les Indépendants), Senator for the Aisne, wrote a letter to Anne Genetet, Minister of Education, expressing his horror. ‘I am appalled by the refusal to accept that France is the result of the encounter between a secular and republican morality and 2000 years of Christian history,’ he wrote to her, also emphasising the value of the Advent calendar as a pedagogical tool – learning vocabulary in English, performing mathematical operations, solving puzzles, grammar rules.

Contacted by Valeurs actuelles, the senator believes that today more than ever, given the devastation woke culture has inflicted on French society, ‘we are a secular state, but we also have a sense of duty to preserve a culture and, of course, Christian roots’. With common sense, he recalled that the school calendar (school holidays, public holidays…) is itself inspired by religious holidays. The senator concluded with a quote from women’s rights activist Elisabeth Badinter: ‘A civilisation dies when it retreats’. Minister Anne Genetet should clarify her position later on Monday.

Interdiction des calendriers de l’Avent à l’école : le sénateur Pierre-Jean Verzelen tire la sonnette d’alarme – Valeurs actuelles

A Syrian family has committed an extraordinary amount of crime in the German city of Stuttgart, leaving police and judicial authorities at a loss on how to deal with their ongoing crime spree. In total, the extended Syrian family is responsible for at least 154 crimes, while the head of the family, 43-year-old Abd Almudy H., who is also an accomplished criminal, blamed the German Youth Welfare Office for the crimes, claiming the agency “spoiled his children.”

One of the youngest criminals in the family is 17-year-old Khalil H. who has committed 34 crimes in just two and half years. He is now serving actual prison time after brutally stabbing a young woman. However, he has three brothers who are in prison as well. In the most recent case, on Wednesday last week, 21-year-old Mufed committed two violent robberies in Stuttgart’s city center within just minutes of one another. He is accused of threatening two girls, both 16, with a box cutter and then stealing their phones, according to Bild.

He then threatened another young woman with a box cutter and demanded her phone but was this time unsuccessful when she resisted. He was arrested after a local police patrol was alerted.

Mufed had just been released from prison two and half months ago after serving three years in prison in a juvenile detention center, according to Focus Magazine. Despite the massive crime spree among the family members, “deportation is currently not possible,” according to authorities.

The total crime count from the 16-person family only came to light after a parliamentary inquiry from the Alternative for Germany (AfD), which was then released by the German interior ministry of Baden-Wurttemberg. The data shows the family has conducted 47 physical assaults, 11 threats, two robberies, three robbery-related thefts, one case of smuggling of foreigners, and recently, attempted murder charges have also been added. There are various other less serious crimes on the family’s record. However, these are only the crimes the family has actually been caught doing.

The family is so infamous at this point that they openly speak to the press about their criminal careers. For example, once Mufed was released from prison, he spoke to Bild, saying: “I was in prison for three years for attempted grievous bodily harm and other things. I had to serve my entire sentence because I had problems with fellow prisoners.”

Mufed told Bild he wanted to train as a geriatric nurse, but instead, he has caused mayhem wherever he has gone, saying: “I came to Germany in 2018 and have made a lot of mistakes since then. I damaged a police van. And I hit anyone who was rude to me on the street.”

The family’s crime saga plays out on the pages of German media, but unlike some other organized crime groups in Germany, the family does not appear to be very sophisticated, often simply participating in daylight robberies and stabbings that lead to their quick apprehension.

Mufe’d brother, 19-year-old Edo, is currently facing charges of attempted murder for stabbing three people in a knife fight in 2023, which led to them being seriously injured. He is already in prison for other crimes but is expected to go on trial in Stuttgart along with three other defendants.

The father, Abd Almudy H., has also spoken with Bild, telling reporters that they came from Aleppo in 2015 during the migration crisis. He said one of his two wives died on the journey to Germany, although it is difficult to verify.

The man has a large number of children and even the youngest are already budding criminals.

“I have 13 children,” he said proudly. He said the German Youth Welfare Office is to blame for their massive criminal records.

“The sons who are now in prison were all placed in homes by the youth welfare office without cell phones. But there they allow the young people to smoke marijuana. That’s why they get into trouble,” he said. He blamed the office for “spoiling” his children.

Regarding his 12-year-old son Ali, who is well known to police, the father said: “He was just buying bread in an Arab supermarket. The police stopped him and found a water pistol on him. That’s all…” Whether that’s enough to be put on record by the authorities, that’s rather unlikely.”

The father of the crime clan is also, according to Bild, untruthful about his own criminal record.

“I didn’t do anything wrong. Just drove a bit fast in the car,” he said.

Bild’s reporting uncovered that he had 12 criminal convictions, and the majority of them were for violent crimes and threats.

Abd Almudy H. has high praise for Germany, a country where his family has run rampant with crime, saying: “It is very nice here. Everything that is here is better than Syria. Only the youth welfare office is bad.”

https://rmx.news/article/syrian-family-terrorizes-germany-with-at-least-154-crimes-including-robberies-attempted-murder-and-assault-in-stuttgart/

By K.M. Breakey

Is there hope for the United Kingdom? Imagine asking that question a century ago when the British Empire spanned 25% of the planet. Or even 50-odd years ago, when England fittingly won the World Cup. Back then, if you can imagine, the English Squad was made up entirely of actual English lads.

Cecil Rhodes once stated: “To be born an Englishman is to win first prize in God’s lottery.” Oh, how the mighty have fallen. This once green and pleasant land has become a hellscape for its natives. People in America worry about a dystopian future? Folks, Britain is living through one.

Sir Keir Starmer, Britain’s wretched new prime minister, made global headlines recently when he criticized the country’s rampant uncontrolled immigration.

“This happened by design, not accident. Policies were reformed deliberately to liberalize immigration. Brexit was used for that purpose, to turn Britain into a one-nation experiment in open borders.”

My God, to admit such treachery. He essentially said the Great Replacement is real and it’s on purpose. Until now, any Brit making this claim has been attacked, censored, deplatformed, even arrested.

And though Keir showed little contrition, he went on to say they would reform the process and crack down on abuses. People are suggesting it’s a significant moment, and maybe it is. I have my doubts. As a friend once said, never trust a filthy commie.

Let’s look at some history. Immigration into Britain is not new, and for the record, it has never been popular. Way back on June 2, 1948, the HMT Empire Windrush arrived at the Port of Tilbury carrying 492 Caribbean migrants. This is generally recognized as the start of it all.

Nowadays, the official story is that the newcomers were essential to help England rebuild after the war. They were saviours really. Furthermore, as subjects of the British Commonwealth, they were entitled to travel freely within the Empire, and that included Britain itself. It was a loophole, and it stayed open for a very long time.

How did the good people of Britain — i.e. Indigenous Brits — how did they feel about immigration? They’ve been against it since Day One. No one wanted it, no one asked for it. But the government paid them no mind, and on it went. The flavour of immigration morphed and changed through the years, as did legislation governing it. What has been consistent, however, is the government’s steadfast betrayal of the English people, as they watched their cities and towns undergo permanent demographic upheaval.

Two decades after Windrush, Enoch Powell made his famous “Rivers of Blood” speech, April 20, 1968. It was a masterpiece of Britishness — a forceful argument expressed politely, elegantly, convincingly. And his words were uncannily prescient. He was right about everything, but I doubt even he predicted it would get as bad as it has. With children butchered in broad daylight, young girls groomed and raped by the tens of thousands, innocent concertgoers blown to smithereens by suicide bombers.

Rivers of blood indeed.

After Mr. Powell’s address, many everyday Brits expressed relief: Finally, someone’s drawing attention to this. Finally, someone’s saying something. Powell became arguably the most popular politician in all of England.

What happened to him? Conservative Party leader Edward Heath dismissed Powell from the Shadow Cabinet, effectively ending his political ambitions. The press ran vicious editorials attacking Powell’s naked appeals to racial hatred. 

And the beat went on. Immigration continued unchecked through the 70s, 80s, and 90s. Cities and towns were permanently altered, as if Britain was being conquered by an enemy. Indeed, it was.

In the past 25 years, Labour and the Conservatives each held power for large blocks of time. No matter who was in charge, immigration continued unchecked. When the good people of Britain voted for Brexit, it was as if the Conservatives took revenge by ensuring record new migration. The scale of the betrayal is grotesque.

What a world they’ve created. Once lovely high-trust communities are now crime-ridden cesspools. Migrants are placed in hotels while downtrodden British are homeless, dying in the streets. Welfare and socialized medical systems crumble under the weight.

Meanwhile, today’s indigenous English, some tracing roots back to the Middle Ages, are treated with contempt. They’re insulted, defiled, humiliated. For an ugly example, look at the July 29, 2024 Southport stabbing, where three young English girls were brutally killed. It was too much to bear, and people erupted in protest.

Indeed, there was even rioting, and of course the media soon forgot about the slaughter to attack white rioters. So did the police. Many whites were arrested with an extra helping of violence. Starmer called protesters far-right thugs and unleashed the full force of the government. Sentencings were rapid and excessive.

Meanwhile, Muslims were essentially given free rein to assert dominance. To roam, to protest, to show spite (and in some cases extreme violence) toward English natives. The double standards were not subtle, nor was the message to Brits. You can’t fight us. We will come for you. We will destroy you.

Is there a feasible path for the UK? It is not an easy question, short of veering into the genre of fantasy. Mischievous dissidents on X suggest America send in troops to save the British from tyranny. Are they being facetious? Perhaps, but I put nothing past President Trump. He’s a mythical figure, not only for Americans but for the world. A singular force of nature who will be remembered for a very long time.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/12/tyranny_in_britain.html#ixzz8tFkJdbtO

The first appearance of the conquerors of Aleppo left no doubt as to their nature: waving weapons and flags, chanting radical slogans and showing a raised index finger, they revealed themselves to be jihadists and radical Muslims.
So there is great astonishment and shock. But in Düsseldorf, the victory of the ‘Islamists’ seems to be a cause for celebration. Dozens or even hundreds of demonstrators marched through the streets of the North Rhine-Westphalian state capital on Saturday.
Even the faces of killed IS fighters were displayed on flags, according to experts such as exiled Syrian Manaf Hassan. Flags of the Faruq Brigades, which are responsible for the expulsion of Christians – for example against Syrian Orthodox Christians in Homs – were also on display. This was denied by the brigades. However, it can hardly be denied that it is part of the jihadist logic and is well documented by the Christian exodus from the Middle East.

This is bad news for Germany in general and North Rhine-Westphalia in particular. It proves what had long been predicted by many, but was not recognised and implemented by politicians: The indiscriminate admission of ‘Syrian refugees’, no matter how good their ‘escape story’ was, inevitably meant that countless sympathisers of radical jihadists were also admitted to Germany. In addition, there are those immigrants who first became radicalised in exile in Germany and are now more or less clearly opposed to the institutions.
This rejection of our state only takes its most extreme form in terrorism, but it begins much earlier. More and more institutions are now realising this, for example when the police report on the large number of clan crimes in North Rhine-Westphalia or warn against no-Jew zones in Berlin. The general mood has changed since the IS attack in Solingen that left three people dead. But the black-green government in Düsseldorf can still hardly be trusted to react decisively and quickly. For example, telling the demonstrators that they can seek ‘protection’ in Idlib and Aleppo if they like such a conquest.

https://www.tichyseinblick.de/kolumnen/aus-aller-welt/syrien-aleppo-radikale-dschihadisten-duesseldorf-jubeln/

On Thursday afternoon ( November 28, 2024), unknown persons damaged various objects in a Jewish prayer room located in the airport.

At around 3.30 pm, a witness noticed that the page of a book had been torn out. A candlestick had also been damaged and other porcelain items broken. The police have started an investigation.

POL-F: 241129 – 1147 Frankfurt – Flughafen: Sachbeschädigung in Gebetsraum | Presseportal

On September 14, 2021, two Polish female professors headed to the Great Salt Lake in Utah to marry some brine shrimp in an ecosexual wedding.

Presided over by Bonnie Baxter PhD, a biology professor at Westminster University in nearby Salt Lake City, the two Polish professor brides in clinging wedding dresses approached holding hands and together with the rest of the wedding party which included a sexologist and Elizabeth Stephens, the chair of UC Santa Cruz’s Art Department, who helped create the ‘Ecosexual’ movement, went into the lake to marry the shrimp through an exchange of psychic vows.

As bizarre as the officially titled ‘Cyber Wedding to the Brine Shrimp’ might seem, it involved the collaboration of academics from at least four universities, and sponsorship by the Polish Cultural Institute of New York, which operates under the Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

What might seem like mental illness is by now a well-established academic field under the aegis of the environmental ‘posthumanities’ which set out to ‘decolonize’ the study of the planet. Rather than the scientific study of the ocean, ‘blue humanities’ applied the usual ‘studies’ formula to viewing the human relationship to the ocean through a Marxist lens. Blue posthumanities then set out to decenter human beings and to center marine life. Blue feminist posthumanities applied feminism to promote a non-binary sexual relationship with the water.

And that is how you end up with academics and universities holding a brine shrimp wedding.

Assistant Professor Ewelina Jarosz and Assistant Professor Justyna Górowska, the two ‘queer brides’ who married the brine shrimp, founded the ‘hydrosexual’ movement, describing themselves as ‘cyber nymphs’ who are moving the ‘ecosexual’ movement forward using ‘queer and feminist blue posthumanism’. Much of their activism is indistinguishable from pornography.

But it’s also the subject of academic papers including ‘Loving the Brine Shrimp: Exploring Queer Feminist Blue Posthumanities’ in the Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics which claims to challenge “settler science by exploring the connection between the reproductive system of brine shrimp and the economy, ecology and culture” to “alter white humans’ perceptions and understanding of the brine shrimp.”

The Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics solicited “indigenous, anti-colonial, queer, gender and intersectional approaches to marine and coastal sea farming” and feminist approaches for a special issue on Feminist Blue Humanities.

The Journal has an editorial board consisting of two dozen PhDs from as far away as Finland, Oklahoma, India and South Africa under the aegis of the massive German Springer science publishing giant which decided to normalize the idea of a psychic brine shrimp wedding.

Blue Feminism got an early public exposure when a TED Talk about ‘feminist glaciology’ went viral to mass mockery. Despite the ridicule, the submission of parody papers and outrage over a 5-year National Science Foundation grant to the author of “Glaciers, gender, and science: A feminist glaciology framework for global environmental change research”: it’s here and thriving.

Feminist glaciology proposed “merging feminist postcolonial science studies and feminist political ecology, the feminist glaciology framework generates robust analysis of gender, power, and epistemologies in dynamic social-ecological systems, thereby leading to more just and equitable science and human-ice interactions.” It’s easy to dismiss that as mad gibberish, but it really means that glaciology (and all science) must be viewed from a Marxist perspective.

Academia has come to mostly consist of applying Marxist feminist, ‘queer’, anti-colonial and other such forms of discourse to every conceivable subject. Culture now means deconstructing every work of art and literature through the oppressed and oppressor paradigms of Marxism. History, where the infection began, has long since fallen victim to it. The various ‘Studies’ fields then spread their ‘critical readings’ of everything that human beings do.

Much like the brine shrimp wedding, ordinary people only became aware of the corruption of the field when outrageous examples of it broke through the academic wall, such as the claims emerging from American Studies that Americans drink milk because of their racism.

Feminist glaciology and brine shrimp weddings represent the colonization and replacement of actual science with the critical ‘studies’ approach to viewing the entire planet and then the universe as oppressive constructs invented by white male slave owners. And what is at stake is the end of any kind of framework of rational inquiry in favor of woke pseudoscience.

Science pursues objectivity while the woke studies fields frame everything in terms of their unique intersectional perspective. In intersectionality, facts are unimportant and what matters above all else is the place of every participant in the oppressor/oppressed paradigm.

A feminist or ‘queer’ perspective on brine shrimp or the workings of the universe is of far more value than what an old white man like Albert Einstein or a hundred of them had to say. To the Marxist mind, everything is a matter of power relations and nothing can be known except by deconstructing and unlearning all the things that capitalism and the patriarchy had taught us.

When applied to science and mathematics, grievance culture leads to claims that whiteboards perpetuate ‘whiteness’ in physics, empiricism is a construct of ‘whiteness’ and contentions that “the idea of math being culturally neutral because two plus two equals four reeks of white supremacist patriarchy” and that “the very nature of the knowledge and who’s produced it and what has counted as mathematics is itself dominated by whiteness and racism.”

But when science is ‘decolonized’ of all its white male past, what do its new diverse intersectional pioneers with their feminist, queer and anti-colonial perspectives contribute to the sum of human knowledge? Brine shrimp weddings, research about “indigenous knowledge” in the secret advanced sciences of Africa and American Indians, and evolutionary biology papers claiming that ‘racist housing policies’ altered the genetic structure of American ants.

Woke science, like woke religion, woke culture and woke everything, is just wokeness wearing any and every subject as a disguise over its usual activism and freakish tendencies. A feminist lens on science reduces objects and phenomena outside the human spectrum to a crude ‘herstory’ binary in which life-giving forces resist male objectivity and exploitation while a queer lens sexualizes everything even right down to water ‘hydrosexuality’ and brine shrimp.

The brine shrimp cyber-wedding is not an aberration, it is exactly what applying intersectionality to science is meant to produce. Radical activism and deviant sexual posturing doesn’t enrich science: it hijacks science for the benefit of activists who view it as a radical art project.

The Soviet Union mandated that all science must be viewed from an ideological perspective, but the rigid discipline of the totalitarian regime suppressed individualism and the system soon ossified into obligatory quotes from Marx and Lenin rather than anything especially innovative. Without that ideological discipline, Marxism in academia devolves into brine shrimp weddings.

Ecosexuality abundantly expresses the narcissism at the heart of the Left. With no intellectual or ideological discipline, the entire world is rewritten to express the identities of a small group. Science must not only accept that men can become women by just thinking about it, but that even the skies and the oceans express the sexuality of the women who would marry shrimp.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/underwater-feminism/

A leading demographer has warned that the white British population may become a minority by the middle of the century if current trends continue as Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer declared this week that the “open borders experiment” was a failure imposed on the country by “design”.

In an apparent confirmation of what many derided as a “conspiracy theory”, the notion of a “Great Replacement” agenda, Prime Minister Starmer said that previous Tory governments “deliberately” decided to liberalise immigration following Brexit to “turn Britain into a one-nation experiment in open borders.”

“This happened by design, not accident. Policies were reformed… Global Britain – remember that slogan… That is what they meant. A policy with no support… Well that’s unforgivable,” he said.

While the prime minister was correct in noting that the so-called Conservative governments of Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak allowed in unprecedented levels of immigration following Brexit — by refusing to put an annual cap on immigration resulting in nearly one million migrants arriving last year, alone — the open borders agenda imposed on the country pre-dates Tory rule.

Indeed, prior to the Labour government of former PM Tony Blair, the UK had net migration in the tens of thousands, however, under Blair this began to soar into the hundreds of thousands per year. In 2009, former Blair advisor Andrew Neather claimed that this was a deliberate policy to transform Britain into a multicultural society and to “rub the right’s nose in diversity.”

The mass migration policies of both Labour and Conservative governments have had a radical impact on the demographic make up of the UK, with the 2021 census finding that less than three quarters (74.4 per cent) of the population identify as a member of indigenous ethnic groups of the British Isles (English, Welsh, Scottish, Northern Irish, or British). This is compared to 80 per cent in 2011 and 87.5 per cent in 2001.

Associate research fellow at Birkbeck, University of London and a senior member at St Antony’s College, Oxford, Dr Paul Morland warned this week that if the political class fails to reverse course, the native white British population could become a minority in their own country by 2050.

UK's leading demographer Dr Paul Morland says by 2050, white British people will be considered "a minority" with the influx of immigration.

"If we do nothing and we stop the immigration, there will be quite serious consequences for demographic decline."@ThatAlexWoman pic.twitter.com/eoQUaZXxp7

— Talk (@TalkTV) November 29, 2024

Dr Morland, who has been described as the UK’s leading demographer, said that since the Blair administration, the UK has seen “more immigration than we had in the whole period from the Norman Conquest to the Second World War.”

He said that if the government continues on the same course, people in the country 30 years ago were overwhelmingly the descendants of people here a thousand years ago, that’s not going to be the case in the middle of the century.” However, Dr Morland argued that “nothing is predetermined”, pointing to the example of former British colony Singapore, which strictly controls immigration.

“It’s a choice, what do we as a country want and does that manage to get expressed and implemented by our politicians. It seems quite clear to me that those two are not the same, the country wants one thing and the politicians are not prepared to follow,” he said.

Noting the “related” issue of declining birth rates, the top demographer said that cutting immigration must be accompanied with pro-natalist policies to encourage the native population have more children to mitigate the financial impacts of a declining population. Morland has previously pointed to policies implemented by the populist-conservative government of Viktor Orbán in Hungary, such as tax and other incentives for mothers, as a potential framework.

While Prime Minister Starmer committed this week to increasing economic opportunities for young people and reforming the immigration system, his government has refused to commit to an annual cap on immigration, which critics have argued is necessary to stem the massive influx of foreigners into the country.

Commentators on social media asserted that Starmer’s comments were an implicit admission of the much-derided “Great Replacement Theory”. Although often portrayed as a “racist” conspiracy theory, the concept, developed by French Renaud Camus, argues that the real aim of mass migration policies are motivated by economics, with leaders seeing their populations as little more than interchangeable cogs who can be changed out with little consequence to bolster GDP.

Speaking to Breitbart News in 2018, Camus said that globalist forces, such as those involved with the Davos-based World Economic Forum, support “the change of people and civilisation for the sake of the industry of man, the economic system which produces the Undifferentiated Human Matter, the human Nutella, spreadable at will.”

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2024/12/01/white-british-set-to-become-minority-by-2050-warns-top-demographer-as-pm-starmer-says-failed-open-borders-experiment-imposed-by-design

The former head of the Scottish Muslim Police Association (SMPA) has been ordered to repay £8000 in compensation to the organisation after being convicted of embezzlement.

Asma Ali, 47, of Glasgow, stole that sum from the SMPA and used the money to pay for flights and rail travel to London as well as hotel stays and a shopping trip to Harrods.

She was sentenced at Glasgow Sheriff Court after pleading guilty to a charge of embezzlement. She was also ordered to carry out 160 hours of unpaid work within a 12-month period under supervision.

The offences took place between March 2017 and June 2019.

Fraser Gibson, Procurator Fiscal for Glasgow and Strathkelvin, said: “Asma Ali flagrantly abused the trust placed in her by the members of the Scottish Muslim Police Association (SPMA) to look after their interests. Instead, she used her position to embezzle funds that should have been set aside to help the association and used that money for her personal use.

“This case demonstrates that those who seek to exploit others for their own personal gain will be held to account for their crimes. We will always prosecute in such cases when it is in the public interest and where there is evidence to do so.”

The court heard how Ali, a founding member of the organisation which was based at Maryhill Police Station in Glasgow, was elected as chairperson in 2016. In 2017, she proposed a procedural change which would allow cheques to be issued with a single signature.

At the same time, a facility was set up allowing the SPMA bank account to be managed through online banking. Between 2017 and 2019, several association officials raised concerns over the organisation’s finances after two treasurers had stepped down.

These concerns centred on a high volume of payments made directly from the association’s account to Ali without receipts or vouching. In August 2019, Ali stepped down from her position as chairperson and 11 days later SPMA officials alerted Police Scotland’s head of professional standards over her management of the organisation.

An investigation then revealed £8,000 had been transferred from the SPMA’s account into a Bank of Scotland account belonging to the accused. An analysis of Ali’s bank transactions showed she was heavily in debt.

Head of Scots Muslim Police Association found guilty of embezzling from organisation – Scottish Daily Express

A Norwegian man who was found in possession of 10,800 videos that sexualize children or depict the sexual abuse of children has been spared a prison sentence on the basis “having personal difficulties.”

The man, whose identity and biological sex has been concealed by Norwegian press, communicated with other pedophiles online and is said to have participated in a group chat with another man who shared content showing himself raping his 8 year-old sister. In response, the trans-identified man expressed a desire to have a child of his own to abuse, and encouraged others to have sexual intercourse with children under 14 years of age.

The case was heard at the Midtre Hålogaland district court beginning in October, where the prosecution requested 320 hours of community service. When handing down a conviction on November 25, the final judgement agreed with the lenient verdict, while adding an additional 100 hours to the total sum, resulting in a sentence of 420 hours of community service in lieu of a prison term.

This was despite the fact that the court argued a suitable sentence would have been imprisonment for 4 years and 8 months if “mitigating circumstances” were not taken into account. Despite this, even this proposed sentence was initially reconsidered due to “major personal challenges” on the part of the sexual predator, and debated down to 2 years and 6 months before community service was ultimately chosen.

Hvorfor skriver NRK «ung kvinne», og nevner ikke et ord om trans i en grov overgrepssak, når det står svart på hvitt i dommen at vedkommende er født mann? https://t.co/CV4ErdpdaT

— Document.no (@DocumentNo) November 27, 2024

The trans-identified pedophile was first detained on December 6, 2023, when found to be in possession of a total of around 2,300 images and around 10,800 videos depicting the sexual abuse of children. Police confiscated his two smartphones, two computers and an external hard drive.

According to police, the man had on several occasions written about and otherwise participated in dialogues about sexual abuse of children via popular messaging app Telegram. Police documents state that he was active in a Telegram chat from December 2021 to September 2022, where he was discussing the sexual abuse of young child with another man.

The convicted predator, who is from Narvik, encouraged an Australian man known online as “Butters (Froggie)” to sexually abuse his 8 year-old sister and other children in a series of chat sessions. Images of the girl being assaulted by “Froggie” were shared within the group chat, and for this reason, the Norwegian was charged with complicity in the rape of the child. “Froggie” is in custody, having been arrested by Australian police after Norwegian authorities tipped them off.

A report from Nettavisen News published explicit messages sent by the Narvik predator to other pedophiles. In one message, he expressed a desire to “creampie” a child. The term is used in pornography to describe ejaculating inside another person. He additionally used crude terms to describe his wish to rape a “loli,” a term used in the Japanese pornography genre “lolicon” to describe animated depictions of sexualized underage girls.

Reduxx spoke with Norwegian journalist Espen Teigen, who covered the case for Document.no earlier this week. Teigen provided redacted court records and confirmed details of the investigation, while adding that the Narvik predator underwent genital surgery in Thailand two years ago at the age of 18.

Despite being male, Norwegian press has reported on the court case while describing the pedophile simply as a “young woman.” In order to protect the victims, identifying information has been withheld. The pedophile was in contact with several young children.

Teigen highlighted the deception on the part of Norwegian press, stating that the media has “deliberately lied” in a bid to protect a child sexual abuser.

“This is a case which shows how trans ideology and gender ideology has gone completely off the rails,” Teigen said. “The state broadcaster, NRK, has deliberately lied to the Norwegian people by writing about a ‘young woman’ who was sentenced because of possession of child exploitation videos and pictures, distributed them and trying to make others have sex with children. This is a grotesque case which should result in a long prison sentence.”

“However, if you read the judgment from the court, you see immediately that it’s not a young woman. It is a man in his 20s, who started dressing as a girl when he was 12 years old. When he turned 18, he flew to Thailand to have gender surgery,” Teigen said.

“In the judgment you can read that the court believes the penalty should be four years, eight months in prison,” Teigen continued.

“However, due the ‘personal conditions’, which are later elaborated to be his transgenderism – he does not even need to go to prison. He will be serving only 420 hours of community service for depraved acts of child molestation. How the mainstream media continues to lie about this case has upset many. This is not justice.”

Norway has strict protections surrounding gender identity, and recent years have seen multiple women’s rights advocates threatened with criminal investigations after “misgendering” or “deadnaming” trans-identified males.

In 2022, Reduxx reported on two cases in which women were investigated by police after referring to trans-identified males as “men” or denying that trans-identified males could be “lesbians.”

In one instance, Tonje Gjevjon, a lesbian artist, was notified in November of 2022 that she was under police investigation for hate speech over a statement she posted to Facebook condemning trans activists who seek to criminalize women who oppose gender ideology. In another, Christina Ellingsen, a representative of Women’s Declaration International (WDI), was investigated under hate crime charges after referring to a trans-identified male as a “man.”

While Gjevjon and Ellingsen were able to successfully combat their charges, a Norwegian man was sentenced to 21 days in prison in 2021 after being found guilty of “insulting” and “misgendering” a trans-identified male on Facebook.

https://reduxx.info/norway-transgender-pedophile-who-expressed-a-desire-to-rape-children-given-420-hours-community-service-no-jail-time/

On 26 November 2024, Ayaan Hirsi Ali (Lady Ferguson) delivered the New Culture Forum’s 2024 Smith Lecture to a sold-out audience in central London. The title of her lecture was “The West: Sleepwalking to Disaster”.

Today, Britain and The West seem crippled by self-loathing. Our heroes and achievements are denigrated, our history rewritten. Race and identity politics are fracturing social cohesion. Mass immigration from the Islamic world has led to a rise in illiberal cultural practices and attitudes towards women, girls and others. Our right to free speech can no longer be taken for granted.

How did we get here? And, crucially, how do we get out?

Ayaan Hirsi Ali is one of the bravest and most prominent voices in the defence of The West. In this thought-provoking speech, she explores the multiple threats to our way of life and how to combat them.

THE SMITH LECTURE

The Smith Lecture is the NCF’s flagship annual event and is delivered by a nationally or internationally significant figure from the arts, media, politics or academia noted for their involvement in the “culture wars”.

Smith Lecturers

2017: Douglas Murray, journalist & author

2018: Nigel Farage MP

2019: Dr. David Starkey, historian & broadcaster

2021: Neil Oliver, author & broadcaster

2022: Rod Liddle, journalist & author

2024: Ayaan Hirsi Ali, campaigner, author & former politician