A horrific axe attack has left six injured at a train station in France.
Following reports, police attended Ozoir-la-Ferrière station early on Monday morning at around 8am.
The brutal attack left one of the victims with one hand severed off, while another’s skull was split open.
Police have launched an investigation for several perpetrators, following the attack that took place in the suburbs outside Paris this morning.
Emergency services rushed to the scene early this morning following reports of the ordeal.
Local media has reported that four of the victims have been taken to hospital, while two have sustained critical injuries.
Spokesperson for the Île-de-France police union UN1TE Reda Belhaj told BFMTV that the victims were “extremely young individuals”.
This morning, train operators at the station shared online: “An incident on board the TUVA train currently at the platform at Ozoir station is forcing us to keep the train at the platform.
The trains that were meant to run through Ozoir-la-Ferrière were cancelled for a period of time, although several are reportedly reopened again.
Police remain stationed around the nearby area.
However, the motivation for the violent attack remains unknown.
According to police sources, ten young individuals, armed with bladed weapons, attacked train passengers.
French MEP Gilbert Collard took to Twitter, writing: “A fight on a train at Ozoir la Ferriere station where axes were allegedly used.
“Two seriously injured, one has a severed hand, the other is hit in the head.
“It’s becoming increasingly crazy and dangerous to survive in France!”
Residents of a small Irish town turned out for a peaceful protest on Sunday evening in response to the alleged gang rape of a 15-year-old boy in the early hours of Friday.
Locals walked through the high street of Ballaghaderreen, Co Roscommon holding candles to mark what the mainstream media has reported as a serious assault on the Irish teenager, but which citizen journalists have disclosed as an alleged gang rape.
The attack occurred just off Main Street at 12:10 a.m. on Friday with police cordoning off the area.
An investigation is ongoing into the attack, and no arrests are understood to have been made.
While no suspects have been named, local residents believe there is a link between the attack and the mass immigration the town has experienced.
On Sunday, angry locals told citizen journalists and local media how the town has become a dumping ground for migrants and has experienced skyrocketing crime rates and anti-social behavior in recent years.
Journalist Philip Dwyer, who attended the protest, spoke to several locals who expressed their deep concern about the state of the town following the heinous attack.
“We don’t hate anybody, but we had the deeds that have been inflicted upon us as a people, as an Irish nation. We’re here in Ballaghaderreen today to attend a public protest around an alleged incident that is meant to have occurred here in this town, where a 15-year-old boy was allegedly gang-raped down a lane in this town,” Dwyer said.
“It just beggars belief that a 15-year-old boy can be gang-raped here,” he added.
Speaking on camera, resident Margaret Garvey said, “We have a lot of young men who are not working, who have accommodation that my son couldn’t get when he returned from Australia. There hasn’t been one racist incident.”
“There are people fleeing from war, but the people here at the moment are using up all the housing. There’s no housing for the local people. They’re not contributing to the community in any way.
“People are reasonable and welcoming, and this is a wonderful community but it’s been fragmented,” she added.
The head of the Ballaghaderreen Concerned Citizens group said the protest was an act of solidarity with the family of the young victim.
“Regardless of who the perpetrators are, the fact is that a child has been raped in our town. Ball Concerned Citizens came here tonight to support a family whose child has been viciously sexually assaulted.
🚨BREAKING🚨
There has been a lot of speculation regarding an incident in Ireland in the last few days.
Tonight at a vigil in the town, the head of the Ballaghaderreen Concerned Citizens group said this on live stream : pic.twitter.com/iGZYKClEm5
“This town is reeling and sore and angry and upset,” she added.
Local councilor Micheál Frain slammed the reduced police presence in the town in recent years and claimed to have knowledge of several serious crimes that have taken place in the town in the last few months.
He told Shannonside radio that the latest assault was another sign of the “breaking down of law and order” in the community, at a time when its population is rising sharply due to mass migration.
He added that the town “could have been a good news story” for integration if the Irish government had ensured sufficient resources and services, but despite the “huge increase” in its population, none had been forthcoming.
“Instead we’ve had diktat from a government department deciding what happens in regard to placing people in the town with no negotiations with locals,” he claimed.
In March this year, residents expressed their outrage at proposals to install 47 modular homes to cater to 206 Ukrainian refugees in the town of 2,000 people.
The move is similar to the same modus operandi used by the Irish government in other towns across the country in what nationalist parties like the Irish For Freedom group have called plantations of migrants into small communities.
A British businessman is set to become a billionaire, earning vast sums of money from the Uk’s migration policies.
Graham King, a former caravan park and disco owner, is raking in £4.8 million (€5.71 million) per day and may become a billionaire from the money earned through housing immigrants, newspaper the Daily Mail reported on November 4.
The entrepreneur, nicknamed the “Asylum King,” will earn a dividend of £90 million (€107 million) from his migrant accommodation business as the UK is seeing record numbers of asylum seekers reaching its shores.
King is anticipated to become the first billionaire in the UK immigration sector, having signed a contract with the Home Office that is set to last until 2029.
The 57-year-old owns the outsourcing firm Clearsprings Ready Homes. This company provides short-term accommodation for asylum seekers while their claims are processed.
Clearsprings Ready Homes has profited from large government contracts to find and oversee residences for asylum seekers to stay in after they get to the UK.
It secured a 10-year contract, estimated to be worth £1 billion (€1.19 billion), with the Home Office in 2019 to house asylum seekers in Wales and the south of England.
To meet these contracts, outsourcers typically rent flats in neighbourhoods but lately, they have begun paying hotels considerable sums to shelter people in the face of a housing crisis.
To accommodate asylum seekers, taxpayers are paying between £127 (€151) and £148 (€176) per migrant per day, or £8 million (€9.52 million) daily.
The company has come under fire for the state of the houses they use to host asylum seekers. Investigators reprimanded Clearsprings over two locations in 2021 for being in “decrepit,” “impoverished” and “run-down” condition.
Last year, more than 70 asylum seekers, including children, slept on the street in protest at two Clearsprings-run hotels in London, claiming they had been crammed into tiny rooms without enough beds, newspaper the Times reported at the time.
According to inspectors, “basic failings of leadership and planning” were evident and almost one-third of the individuals screened reported mental health issues.
Previously, King ran a caravan park with his brother and later became the owner of a disco but lost his licence.
That building was then used to house migrants.
Since starting his real estate company in 1999, King has secured many large government contracts to supply temporary housing, primarily for asylum seekers.
Currently believed to reside overseas, King owns a second business, Bespoke Strategy Solutions, which is headquartered in the United Arab Emirates.
In a reaction to the newspaper the Sun on November 2, a Home Office spokesperson said: “Our asylum accommodation contracts contain a profit-share device so that profits above the agreed margins come back to us.”
Clearsprings Ready Homes declined to comment on questions from the media.
Horrific news from the Berlin district of Marzahn: the police are apparently investigating a possible homicide after a serious incident was reported in the early afternoon. According to reports, a mother and her two daughters were killed and the suspected perpetrator is said to be on the run. The first homicide squad has taken over the investigation. The investigation is currently ongoing. ‘Details about the people involved are not yet available,’ a spokesperson for the Berlin police told the newspaper KURIER. No further information can be provided at present as this could jeopardise the further investigation.
According to the newspaper B.Z., the victims are said to be a mother and her two daughters. The woman’s partner is said to be on the run. According to the newspaper, the crime scene is said to be in Ludwig-Renn-Straße. Police officers found the bodies of the mother and the girls there in the afternoon. According to B.Z., neighbours had previously noticed an unpleasant smell coming from the dead woman’s flat and called the police. Pictures are circulating on social media showing the prefabricated building in Ludwig-Renn-Straße where the crime scene is said to be located. The images show, among other things, police vehicles and barriers in front of the building; police officers and forensic experts are on site.
According to the newspaper Bild, the 31-year-old mother lived with her two daughters, aged five and six, in a four-room flat on the first floor of an apartment block. Details about the people involved and the background to the crime have not yet been officially confirmed by the police. According to the spokesperson for the Berlin public prosecutor’s office, there may be several victims in the Marzahn district – no further information on possible fatalities has been officially released. It is unclear whether this is a family drama. However, neighbours told Bild that they had never heard any arguments. The family, who had immigrated from Egypt, had moved to the neighbourhood five years ago and the six-year-old child had only recently started school. The girls had always been ‘’sweet‘’, said a neighbour, who was shocked by the horrific crime. The mother had trained as a nursery school teacher and her partner, who is now on the run, was ‘a quiet guy’. Initial online reactions to the crime were also horrified. ‘Three murders in Marzahn, it’s really terrible, I’m from the neighbourhood, I hope the murderer is caught quickly,’ wrote one user on X (formerly Twitter).
The insanity surrounding the prosecution of three exiled Iranians by the Hamburg public prosecutor’s office shows how far Islamisation has progressed in Germany’s judiciary and how the political desire to make it as acceptable as possible for the ‘religion of peace’ in this country on its inexorable path towards a Sharia caliphate is now being put into practice. They had demonstrated in front of the Islamic Centre Hamburg (IZH) against the mullah regime and its agents in Germany, burning pages of the Quran in the process. The Iranian Consulate General then called on the Hamburg Senate to take legal action. The left-wing appeasement policy of the Hanseatic city immediately complied – and used the case not to clearly side with freedom-loving opponents of the regime and opponents of Islamic fascism, but to do the will of Tehran.
The authority, which is bound by instructions, is now accusing the three Iranian dissidents of ‘joint insulting of religious beliefs’ because of the protest action, which took place on the 6th of August 2022. As reported by the newspaper ‘Welt’, the defendants will shortly have to answer to the Hamburg-St. Georg district court. There is no doubt that the complainant IZH has always been an outpost of the Iranian regime in Germany, which was warned of as an ‘important propaganda instrument of the Islamic Republic of Iran’ more than 30 years ago by the (then still neutral) Office for the Protection of the Constitution. After evidence of terror support from IZH clerics and propaganda incitement emerged, Federal Minister of the Interior Nancy Faeser reluctantly banned the organisation in July. The ban had long been called for by the same Iranian regime critics who are now being prosecuted by the Hamburg judiciary – because they were ultimately denouncing precisely what the overdue ban on the IZH had been directed against.
Even more perverse: the people accused by the public prosecutor’s office also include the mullah-critical activist Jasmin Maleki, who has already demonstrated against the Ayatollah’s oppressive state in Iran at the risk of her life and had to flee there in 2016. However, she did not tear up or burn a Quran – ‘but gave a speech that was critical of Islam and pro-feminism’, as the 35-year-old claims and as can be seen on the video evidence from a group of activists. Although she did exactly what is a constitutional right in the free West and especially in Germany, which is the main difference to the terrorist state of Iran, Maleki is now being persecuted by a politically and religiously indoctrinated cowardly justice system in Germany.
German legal scholars and organisations critical of Islam are equally shocked. The Giordano Bruno Foundation’s Institute for Worldview Law, which advocates a secular legal policy and state neutrality, is now making serious accusations in this regard, as reported by Die Welt: ‘The impression arises that the totalitarian Iranian regime has succeeded in exerting influence on the German criminal prosecution of Iranians in exile – this is both shocking and disturbing,’ the newspaper quotes Institute Director Jörg Scheinfeld as saying.
The Professor of Criminal Law at the University of Mainz is further outraged: ‘The fact that the Iranian regime in Germany, of all countries, can initiate the prosecution of those who have fled from it and who rightly criticise it for its perversion of religion, shows very clearly how absurd and misguided the criminal provision of Section 166 of the German Criminal Code is.’
It is now fair to say that British standards have found their way into the Federal Republic of Germany. On the island – at the latest with the takeover of the government by Labours under Prime Minister Keir Starter, which has been completely infiltrated by Islamists – Western liberal tolerance, freedom of religion and freedom of speech have only had a theoretical meaning since the slightest criticism of Muslim organisations has been sufficient for draconian prosecution.
In case you have not been paying attention – leftist groups around the country have been caught corrupting our elections by dumping tens of thousands of bogus ballot registrations into our voter rolls. This is taking place in state after state.
PENNSYLVANIA
Lancaster County, Pennsylvania city officials announced eight days ago that they were investigating a massive fraudulent voter registration operation investigation involving thousands of fraudulent voter registrations. At least 2,500 ballot registrations were in question.
On Saturday, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania announced that they were also investigating hundreds of fake ballot registrations that were turned in recently by a questionable voter registration group. Lancaster, Monroe and York Counties in Pennsylvania have reported similar criminal acts and they are investigating. At least two counties reported that Field+Media Corps was behind the thousands of fraudulent registrations. The ballot registration harvesting group is based in Arizona.
MICHIGAN
The Gateway Pundit reported extensively about the leftist group GBI Strategies, a Democrat-linked group that received funding from Joe Biden and the Democrat Senatorial Campaign, that was caught dumping thousands of fraudulent ballots into the 2020 election in Michigan. GBI Strategies had “canvassers” working in several black-majority cities in Michigan, including Flint, Benton Harbor, Ypsilanti, Inkster, Southfield, Muskegon, Lansing, and Saginaw.
The FBI took over the GBI investigation in where it went to die.
An official with GBI, Brianna Hawkins, admitted to police that the group turned in hundreds of fake registrations and was operating in several states and Washington DC.
OHIO
In August 2024, The Hamilton County Ohio Board of Elections turned over several suspicious voter registration applications Ohio Secretary of State’s Public Integrity Division. According to Hamilton County Board of Elections members, the voter registrations in question were recently turned in by the self-described “progressive” voter registration organization Black Fork Strategies. Hamilton County Director of Elections Sherry Poland held up a large stack of voter registrations during a local meeting about an inch thick to show how many registrations one canvasser from Black Fork Strategies turned in with that all appeared to have the same handwriting. The investigation was turned over to the Secretary of State.
ARIZONA
This now leads us to Arizona. According to the far-left media outlet, Arizona Central, Maricopa County officials reported that 90,000 registration forms were turned in by a third-party group on the last day of voter registration (October 27) in the state. This tends to be a similar practice to other leftist registration harvesting groups – dumping thousands on state clerks around the cut off date for registering to vote.
According to the Arizona Republic 40,000 of the registrations or almost half of the total were damaged or incomplete and could not be used.
Maricopa Spokesperson Taylor Kinnerup said many forms were dated weeks prior. Arizona state law mandates that third-party groups submit registration forms to election officials “within five days” of collecting the forms from voters. So this was another infraction by the group.
Officials said up to 90,000 forms were submitted by third-party groups on the last day of voter registration before the upcoming election, far more than Recorder’s Office staff expected. Since then, about 50,000 forms have been processed, although some were incomplete and require voters to provide additional information.
But the remainder — an estimated 30,000 to 40,000 forms — were entirely unusable because they were torn, wet or otherwise damaged…
…Voters who didn’t completely fill out their registration form or who filled out a form that ended up damaged may have to cast a provisional ballot on Election Day.
The third-party group that dumped the thousands of registrations on the final day of registering pays their employees by the number of ballots the turn in. So they are incentivizing the fraud.
It should be clear at this point that this is how Democrats are finding their new voters. It appears the majority of these “new voters” may be fake registrations.
On today’s #NCFWhittle we are joined by journalist Steve Edginton, US correspondent for GB News. He takes us on a deep dive into all things related to the US election.
Are you serious? That’s probably what pop star Helene Fischer will be asking herself, because a song she sang together with some children is now causing a stir. It is reminiscent of Islamic prayer and should not be made fun of. Helene Fischer recently released an album of children’s songs. One of them is the well-known ‘Aramsamsam’. According to several media reports, this song has been criticised for some time because it allegedly translates the Arabic language into gibberish. Critics say that the movements that are danced to it mock Islamic prayer. Last Thursday, the pop singer posted this song and dance with some children on her Instagram channel. ‘I think the choreography for my show is ready! Which of you will be in Düsseldorf on December 6 or 7 for the recording of the show?’ she wrote. One commenter says that the song is not about tolerance and diversity. Another, on the other hand, writes: ‘This children’s song should now be sung as an anthem in every beer tent.’ Let’s see how long she is allowed to sing this beautiful children’s song with the kids.
Pro-Palestinian Arab activists from the Palestine Action group on Saturday stole two busts of Israel’s first President, Chaim Weizmann, from a glass cabinet at Manchester University, reported The Telegraph.
The incident was part of a series of vandalism on the 107th anniversary of the Balfour Declaration.
The Balfour Declaration, issued on November 2, 1917, was a letter from then-British foreign secretary Arthur Balfour to Lord Rothschild, expressing British support for “a national home for the Jewish people”, leading the way for the founding of Israel in 1948.
A video released by Palestine Action shows two masked individuals breaking into the glass cabinet with mallets before placing the sculptures in their bags. The video’s caption accuses Weizmann of securing the Balfour Declaration, which the group described as a “British pledge” that led to the “ethnic cleansing of Palestine.”
Meanwhile, in Cambridge, Palestine Action activists collaborated with students to spray red paint on the university’s Institute of Manufacturing in protest of Balfour’s association with Cambridge University, where a portrait of him was displayed at Trinity College until recently.
In London, Palestine Action also vandalized the Britain Israel Communications and Research Centre (BICOM) on Hampstead High Street with red paint, asserting that it was “funded by wealth made from manufacturing Israeli weapons” and aligned with their mission to “dismantle Zionism.”
The group also took responsibility for an attack on a Jewish charity’s office in Hendon, where they drenched the Jewish National Fund building with red paint overnight.
A spokesperson for Greater Manchester Police stated, “Shortly before midnight last night, we received a report of a burglary at a university building on Oxford Road, Manchester. Officers have attended the scene and liaised with the university and their security team as part of their ongoing enquiries.”
This past March, members of Palestine Action defaced a painting of Lord Balfour at Trinity College Cambridge.
The group shared images of an activist spraying the portrait with red paint and slashing it.
Palestinian Arab organizations have long been waging a campaign aimed at forcing Britain to apologize for the Balfour Declaration.
The PA cabinet in Ramallah in 2017 demanded not just a British apology for the document, but also compensation.
During the years following World War II, the very harmless and extraordinarily humorous author, P. G. Wodehouse, was subjected to a campaign vilifying him as a fascist sympathizer. The ‘evidence’ for this claim came primarily in the form of a few imprudent radio broadcasts that accurately described conditions in the German camps used to imprison British civilians found in German-occupied territories. There was also the characterization, in his books, of the fictitious and obviously parodic “Black Shorts” led by the bombastic and buffoonish Roderick Spode. Nevertheless, humorless individuals—too obtuse to realize that Wodehouse was using an easily satirized political movement for comedic purposes—claimed that his books were somehow persuading people that fascism was not a threat.
Roughly the same period saw John Lukacs—a self-professed reactionary and Catholic convert—establish himself as a leading conservative thinker. He argued that fascism would be an enduring threat despite its recent obliteration, and that communism was just a passing danger—a house of cards sure to fall sooner rather than later, despite the power of the Soviet Union and China at the height of the Cold War.
Irony is added to irony by the fact that Lukacs did not just gain respectability as a serious social critic by thoroughly underestimating one evil political movement while just as thoroughly overestimating another (one which a novelist was condemned for mocking)—he also unwittingly hit on the reasons why communism had the potential to be both more enduring and more destructive than he understood.
Lukacs built his argument on two foundational claims. Fascist movements had been able to gain total control of government through democratic elections. Communists had never gained power except through the violence of a committed minority. From there, he argued that entire populations could become fascist, but that communist regimes are paradoxically reliant upon a self-appointed elite and consequently are sure to implode under the weight of their absurdity.
It is perplexing that Lukacs managed to overlook the fact that coalitions of ideologically similar communists, socialists, and anarchists did not just gain widespread popularity but even won elections; as is his failure to notice the growing influences of Cultural Marxism since the 1960s. There is also the matter of his obvious overemphasis on the unpopularity of only the most orthodox Marxist theories. Moreover, he underappreciated how much fascism’s popularity was dependent upon crises, without which it could never have risen above a joke worthy of being satirized in just the way that Wodehouse did.
Odder still is Lukacs’ failure to explain why fascism was able more rapidly to gain a following than radical leftism, even though the reason is straightforward: fascism simply pervert normal human instincts, while leftism tries to negate them. Because it is normal for people to love and to prefer their own country, culture, people (and so on), fascism twists that natural inclination into doctrines of racial superiority, while leftism tries to stamp out this normal preference.
It is because fascism does not require the same depth of corruption, that people can be more susceptible to embracing it; but are also more likely to abandon it. The passage of just twenty years saw most Germans go from laughing at the Nazis in 1925, to cheering wildly for Hitler in 1935, to obliterating all reminders of the Third Reich in 1945. Radical leftist doctrines required slow and often subtle inculcation over generations before becoming widely accepted. By now, they have destroyed the normal instincts of so many people that the societies pervaded by cultural Marxism are close to the same kind of implosion that Lukacs predicted for the Soviet Union.
Seen in this light, it becomes obvious that the reason why leftists habitually mischaracterize nationalist movements as racist or fascist is because they believe that normal instincts are perverse, and that racism and fascism are no more than extreme forms of those instincts.
If there is any danger of a fascist resurgence, then it is not due to the rise of conservative and nationalist movements—it is due to leftism. Leftist policies attack normality and allow the gradual destruction of national cultures and ethnic groups through globalism, mass migration, and ‘European integration.’ It is leftists who create the sort of crisis which will result in some people making what they consider to be a regrettable but necessary alliance with or shift towards fascists. It is leftists who give fascism undeserved credibility by equating it with normality. And it is leftists who are most opposed to the healthy policies—border control, strict immigration limit, cultural assimilation, and so on—that would be the best antidote to the fascist temptation.