On today’s #NCFWhittle we are joined by Dr. Larry Arnn, President of Hillsdale College, America’s leading Conservative, Christian college. In recent years, Republican officials have been turning to Hillsdale College in Michigan for teacher training, textbook reviews and a curriculum that celebrates American patriotism. Dr. Arnn discusses President Trump’s election victory as well as the mission and ethos of Hillsdale College.
Biography:
Larry P. Arnn is the 12th president of Hillsdale College, where he is also a professor of politics and history. He received his B.A. from Arkansas State University and his M.A. and Ph.D. in Government from the Claremont Graduate School. He also studied at Worcester College, Oxford University, where he served as director of research for Sir Martin Gilbert, the official biographer of Winston Churchill. From 1985 to 2000, he served as president of the Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship and Political Philosophy. In 1996, he was the founding chairman of the California Civil Rights Initiative, which prohibited racial preferences in state hiring, contracting, and admissions. Dr. Arnn is on the board of directors of The Heritage Foundation, the Henry Salvatori Center of Claremont McKenna College, the Philadelphia Society, the Intercollegiate Studies Institute, and the Claremont Institute. He served on the U.S. Army War College Board of Visitors for two years, for which he earned the Department of the Army’s “Outstanding Civilian Service Medal.” In 2015, he received the Bradley Prize from the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation. Dr. Arnn is the author of three books: Liberty and Learning: The Evolution of American Education; The Founders’ Key: The Divine and Natural Connection Between the Declaration and the Constitution and What We Risk by Losing It; and Churchill’s Trial: Winston Churchill and the Salvation of Free Government.
Today, a large part of the Amsterdam police force is made up of second-generation migrants from North Africa and the Middle East. They do not care about Jews’ safety. And it will be that way all over Europe
X Screenshots
by Giulio Meotti
I’ve written about it so much that the crazy scenes in Amsterdam felt like déjà vu.
In Amsterdam we have seen scenes that should shock Europe forever: hundreds of Jews were hunted down and beaten by the Muslim crowd after a soccer match between Maccabi Tel Aviv and Ajax. Whether it was a spontaneous explosion or an organized attack, the latter being the most likely, Israelis were injured and Israel was sending emergency flights on Shabbat to evacuate its citizens.
Say it again: Israel was sending emergency flights on Shabbat to evacuate its citizens. Not from Yemen or Syria or Iran or Kabul. No, from Amsterdam.
In Amsterdam, only one in three children under 15 is a Dutch native. Islam is already the first religion in Amsterdam. For years, Mohammed has been the first name among newborns in the four largest cities in the Netherlands: The Hague, Amsterdam, Rotterdam, and Utrecht.
The most notable comment is from Ayaan Hirsi Ali, who knows the Netherlands well. She tries about “the takeover of the city”, something very specific. “I mean the takeover of the city’s internal security apparatus. Today, a large part of the Amsterdam police force is made up of second-generation migrants from North Africa and the Middle East. Since October 7 last year, some officers have already refused to guard Jewish sites such as the Holocaust Museum”.
Beatings and chases in the streets and on trains, people throwing themselves into the canal to save themselves, Arab patrols to check passports.
The Islamic attackers proudly shared their violent acts on social media. What do you remember? October 7. Yes?
We are inside the great “utopia” of opposing cultures that meet and clash in an obsessively prescribed coexistence and that, if not stopped, will result in civil war.
I fear the worst, like Ayaan Hirsi Ali: that the Dutch authorities knew that the Israelis would be attacked and that they did not protect them. In October, news broke that the Dutch police refuse to protect Jews.
The great Holocaust historian, the late Robert Wistrich, wrote:
“It is not for nothing that former European Commissioner Frits Bolkestein advised the Dutch Jewish community to emigrate to avoid harassment by fanatical young Muslims. The verdict is on the wall, for anyone with eyes to see. The reward for Europe’s deplorable and cowardly appeasement of Islamism will, however, be short-lived. Because kowtowing and stubborn blindness has a high long-term cost. Muslims will eventually take revenge on a European society they detest.”
Dear dhimmis, mark these words: after the Jews will come all the others, Christians, secularists, atheists, agnostics and ultimately their accomplices, until the “peace” of Islam reigns over all of Europe.
A trans-identified male in Germany has been sentenced to an indefinite stay at a psychiatric ward as part of his sentence for exhibitionism and violent assaults on women. Due to strict privacy laws in Germany, the man’s identity has not been released, and he will be referred to as “Klaus” for the purposes of this article.
As previously reported by Reduxx, the 56-year-old man from Troisdorf had to stand trial at the regional court in Bonn for threats, grievous bodily harm and exposing his penis to women on a train. But during the trial, the court had to weigh whether or not to pursue the charges against Klaus for exhibitionism due to his gender identity. In Germany, only males can be charged with exhibitionism of the penis, and because Klaus identified as “female,” it was initially unclear whether the charge could apply to him.
However, as General-Anzeiger has now revealed, the court determined that because Klaus had not yet changed his legal sex marker, the charges for exhibitionism were still applicable.
Klaus was sentenced to one year and ten months in prison for grievous bodily harm, threats and exhibitionism, but is unlikely to ever see the inside of a jail cell. Immediately after the verdict was announced, he was transported to a closed psychiatric hospital for an indefinite period of time due to his sadistic violent fantasies that the court argued made him a danger to the general public.
Klaus has a lengthy criminal record, and, during the trial, a review of his past violent history is said to have taken over an hour to read out.
In October of 2008, Klaus attacked a 52-year-old woman, violently pulling her to the ground and sitting on her in an attempt to try and pull her boots off her legs. According to a General Anzeiger report from the time, Klaus fled to the forest to try the boots on, at which point he got “real excitement.” After being tracked down by police, investigators found a whole collection of women’s boots at his home.
The next year, Klaus was sentenced to two years and four months in prison after being convicted of aggravated extortion and grievous bodily harm, and the court ordered permanent placement in a psychiatric institution because he was found to have attacked a total of two women in order to violently rip their boots off their feet. His second attack was only possible because he had not been detained after his first was reported.
During that trial, a psychiatric expert stated that it was clear that Klaus was a dangerous man and “what drives him goes far beyond fetishism.” The expert testified that Klaus was at risk for escalating his behavior in order to get a “stronger kick” out of his actions.
But his stay in the psychiatric clinic only lasted around 7 years and, while confined to the facility for his criminal convictions, Klaus began identifying as a woman and received both hormone replacement therapy and breast implants. Klaus has already reportedly stated that he has no desire to have a vaginoplasty.
Klaus was handed his sentence just one day before Germany’s new self-identification law came into force. He is now entitled to change his legal sex and be placed on a women’s ward at the psychiatric hospital he will be housed at.
On November 1, 2024, the Self-Determination Act came into force in Germany. The law is widely considered to be one of the most relaxed gender identity laws in the world, and greatly simplifies the process for changing the sex marker and names on legal documents. The law has almost no restrictions, and even convicted sex offenders can be fast-tracked for identity changes.
The law has also strengthened “protections” for trans-identified individuals. Those accused of revealing the birth sex or name of a transgender person risk fines of €10,000 (approx. $11,000 USD).
On today’s #NCFNewspeak, NCF Director Peter Whittle, Senior Fellow Dr. Philip Kiszely and Amy Gallagher of Stand up to Woke discuss Donald Trump’s stunning election victory and what it means. Also, Kemi Badenoch takes control of the Tory Party.
French Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau wants tougher rules for delinquent juveniles. Screen grab youtube
French interior minister Bruno Retailleau has said he wanted “military supervision” for juvenile delinquents to “strictly supervise” them.
He said he was in favour of “a militarised solution” for minors convicted of “sufficiently serious” offences.
Speaking with Sud Radio on November 7, Retailleau pleaded for a re-education of young delinquents.
“I am for an educational-militarised solution,” he said, promoting “establishments with military discipline” to “strictly supervise” and “re-civilise” such youths.
Retailleau claimed that, in France: “Those who kill are younger and younger and those who are killed are younger and younger.”
Because of this, he said he wanted to tackle “the problem of school”, targeting children from the age of 10 to 12 if they were convicted of sufficiently serious offences, such as drug trafficking.
“As soon as the first offence is serious enough,” they could be sent to these establishments, according to Retailleau.
“I have asked my secretary of state, Othman Nasrou, to study this issue,” he said.
Retailleau added that the fight against juvenile delinquency must begin at its roots.
“There is the educational issue of these families that are broken, where children completely slip away and then there is the problem with the school system. We need to try to re-civilise these young people.”
He added he was “1,000 times in favour” of cutting social benefits for the families of juvenile offenders.
“When we provide benefits, it’s not an entitlement; it’s a right, but one that comes with responsibilities. When these responsibilities are not upheld, there can be consequences,” he said.
An earlier programme implemented by French President Macron, the Universal National Service (SNU), was dismissed as “a failure” by Retailleau.
The SNU is a French Government initiative aimed at fostering civic engagement, national unity and social cohesion among young people. It is not imposed by officials on students and is offered on a voluntary basis free of charge.
Launched in 2019, it targets 15 to 17-year-olds and involves a two-week residential stay focused on civic education, first aid and community activities. That is followed by a three to 12-month “public-service mission” in areas such as environmental protection, education or social services.
Since the global roll-out of the COVID-19 injections in late 2020, substantial data has surfaced linking them to a catastrophic number of deaths. Below is a working list of some of the strongest evidence to date:
Rancourt et al: estimated 17 million COVID-19 vaccine deaths worldwide by September 2023.
Mostert et al: estimated 1 million excess deaths likely attributed to COVID-19 vaccination/lockdowns among 47 countries of the Western World from 2020 to 2022.
Skidmore: estimated 278,000 Americans may have died from the COVID-19 vaccine by December 2021.
Pantazatos and Seligmann: estimated 146,000 to 187,000 possible vaccine-associated deaths in the United States by August 2021.
Hulscher et al(I): estimated 49,240 excess cardiac arrest deaths possibly due to COVID-19 vaccination in the U.S. from 2021-2023.
Hulscher et al(II): found a high likelihood of a causal linkbetween COVID-19 vaccines and death from analysis of 325 autopsies.
Aarstad and Kvitastein: found a higher COVID-19 vaccine uptake was associated with increased all-cause mortality.
Alessandria et al: found all-cause death risks to be higher for those vaccinated with one and two COVID-19 vaccine doses compared to unvaccinated individuals. The subjects vaccinated with two doses lost 37 percent of life expectancy compared to the unvaccinated population during follow-up.
Regardless of methodology used, far too many suspected deaths have occurred due to the experimental COVID-19 injections. For reference, approximately 140,000 people were killed from the Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima in 1945. Therefore, the COVID-19 injection campaign may have killed the equivalent of at least 121 Hiroshima nuclear attacks.
COVID-19 “vaccine” death acknowledgment by federal agencies may mirror the same path as finally declaring smoking harmful in 1964 after years of claiming cigarettes to be healthy.
Unfortunately, the time elapsed from the first reports of serious adverse events to withdrawal of products has not improved consistently over the last 60 years. Since 1950, 95 medicinal products were withdrawn from markets due to causing death. Eighty-three percent of withdrawals due to death utilized evidence drawn from case reports. Most withdrawals occur more than one or two years after the first reports of deaths begin to appear. Thus, COVID-19 vaccines are now long overdue for market withdrawal.
The continuation of advertising and recommending deadly medical products (COVID-19 injections) for all ages flagrantly violates “The Precautionary Principle”:
When an activity raises threats of harm to human health or the environment, precautionary measures should be taken even if some cause-and-effect relationships are not fully established scientifically.
A situation in which there is a reasonable probability that the use of or exposure to a violative product will cause serious adverse health consequences or death.
This indicates that the COVID-19 injectable products must undergo an immediate Class I recall by the FDA to protect public safety. This should be priority No. 1 of the next presidential administration, as COVID-19 injections remain an immediate threat to the entire U.S. population aged 6 months and older.
Montreal, CA – 16 March 2021: Vials of Astrazeneca, Pfizer BioNTech and Moderna Covid-19 vaccines Shutterstock
A medical watchdog group has obtained emails indicating that officials from the left-wing Gates Foundation, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and pharmaceutical giant BioNTech were interested in collaborating on COVID-19 shots since before the national “pandemic” was formally declared, intensifying concerns about public health officials allowing business considerations influence sound medicine.
The Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), which for years has been reviewing NIH documents periodically released as a result of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit it brought in 2020, reports that the latest batch includes a February 2, 2020, email from a Gates Foundation official introducing former NIH Vaccine Research Center (VRC) Deputy Director Dr. Barney Graham and BioNTech CEO Ugur Sahin to one another “regarding 2019-nCoV.”
“Thank you for your interest in our antigen design effort for CoV vaccines,” Graham replied, quickly scheduling a phone call, resulting in BioNTech reporting its “vaccine efforts are well under way” and its readiness to discuss a “corresponding license agreement” just three weeks later.
The Gates Foundation purchased $55 million worth of BioNTech stocks in September 2019 (one of multiple heavy investments in COVID shot manufacturers), and at the time of the February 2 email, the first confirmed American COVID infection was just 13 days old, and the global pandemic would not be declared for another month.
On March 13 of 2020, Graham forwarded on to the head of his department an email from a market research company asking for help “understand[ing] the market sentiment of the vaccines industry towards COVID-19 vaccines” during a stock downturn. Graham asked, “I never answer inquiries like this, but do you think it might be appropriate for people like us to speak to the investor world and try to calm things down?”
“Both these incidences show how the NIH acts just like a for-profit corporation with a vested interest in forming partnerships and worrying about financial markets—perhaps because the agency and many of its employees stand to profit from the success of the vaccines they develop, just like Graham did from the Moderna vaccine,” ICAN says.
BREAKING: Freedom Of Information Emails Show Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Introduced NIH Official to BioNTech CEO Before "Pandemic" Was Even Declared and “ C19 Vaccine Efforts Were Well Under Way" and Discuss ”Licensing Agreement!!!" https://t.co/e7JtFgzpx0
BioNTech would go on to collaborate with Pfizer on a COVID-19 shot based on mRNA technology. A large body of evidence backs up concerns about the Pfizer-BioNTech jab, as well as Moderna’s mRNA shot and Johnson & Johnson’s viral vector shot, all of which were developed and reviewed in a fraction of the time vaccines usually take under the first Trump administration’s Operation Warp Speed initiative (the J&J vaccine has not been offered in the United States since its supply ran out last year).
The federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) reports 38,068 deaths, 218,646 hospitalizations, 22,002 heart attacks, and 28,706 myocarditis and pericarditis cases as of October 25, among other ailments. U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) researchers have recognized a “high verification rate of reports of myocarditis to VAERS after mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination,” leading to the conclusion that “under-reporting is more likely” than over-reporting.
An analysis of 99 million people across eight countries published February in the journal Vaccine “observed significantly higher risks of myocarditis following the first, second and third doses” of mRNA-based COVID shots, as well as signs of increased risk of “pericarditis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis,” and other “potential safety signals that require further investigation.” In April, the CDC was forced to release by court order 780,000 previously undisclosed reports of serious adverse reactions, and a study out of Japan found “statistically significant increases” in cancer deaths after third doses of mRNA-based COVID-19 jabs, and offered several theories for a causal link.
Yet so far, Big Pharma has largely escaped accountability thanks to both the federal National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 and the federal Public Readiness & Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act of 2005.
According to the Congressional Research Service (CRS), the PREP Act empowers the federal government to “limit legal liability for losses relating to the administration of medical countermeasures such as diagnostics, treatments, and vaccines.” Near the beginning of the 2020 COVID-19 outbreak, the Trump administration invoked the act in declaring the virus a “public health emergency.”
Under this “sweeping” immunity, CRS explains, the federal government, state governments, “manufacturers and distributors of covered countermeasures,” and licensed or otherwise-authorized health professionals distributing those “countermeasures” are shielded from “all claims of loss” stemming from them, with the exception of “death or serious physical injury” brought about through “willful misconduct,” a standard that, among other hurdles, requires the offender to have acted “intentionally to achieve a wrongful purpose.”
All eyes are currently on former President Donald Trump, who just won his campaign to return to the White House and whose team has given mixed signals as to the prospects of reconsidering the injections for which he has long taken credit.
Meanwhile, some hope that legal action can succeed in bringing accountability on the issue by legally targeting the companies for misrepresentation rather than their products directly. In Florida, an ongoing grand jury investigation into the shots’ manufacturers is slated to release a highly anticipated report on the jabs, and a lawsuit by the state of Kansas has been filed accusing Pfizer of fraud for calling the shots “safe and effective.”
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has said that he was “deeply honoured” to have been at Mar-a-Lago with President-elect Donald Trump earlier this week. Mr Farage said that come the inauguration people will be able to say “woke has died”. Addressing the Reform UK Welsh conference on Friday, the MP for Clacton said: “What has happened in America in the last few days is what happens when you get a political movement with a strong political leader that actually talks to the electorate about the things that they care about.” Mr Farage added: “It really has been a truly stunning victory. “He focused of course mostly on the cost of living, on the southern border, illegal immigration. “And I think we can also quite safely say that on the day of the inauguration in America, ‘woke has died’, and thank God for that.”
Liberal women across the US have vowed to never have sex with a man again in revenge for Donald Trump winning the election.
Thousands have pledged to join the so-called ‘4B Movement’ as retaliation for men in America voting for the Republican.
The name “4B” refers to four self-imposed restrictions, each beginning with “b” (meaning “no” in Korean): No dating men (biyeonae), No sexual relationships with men (bisekseu), No marriage to men (bihon), No childbirth (bichulsan).
The ‘extreme feminism’ emerged as a response to what South Korean women perceived as a patriarchal and misogynistic culture – and has now been appropriated by angry left-wing female voters across America.
Some have said they will continue the protest until Trump is either dead or no longer president. Others have vowed to never sleep with men again.
Woman says she has an IQ of 130 and will now “stay dry” and not sleep with men because Trump was elected.
She said it’s punishment for taking away her right to an abortion.
One woman explained the reasoning behind her abstinence in a video on X. She said: “Not that my content reaches a lot of men because I have an IQ of 130, but I want the men in this country to know that half the female population, we are dry.
“We are probably going to stay dry. I am as dry as a desert baby and I do not want that to change.
“We are not going to like you anymore, do you understand that?
“It doesn’t matter if you take away abortion, we will want to have your babies even less. If you take away contraception, women are really good at celibacy because you guys are actually a threat to us.
“We have a lot less to gain from you. 4B all the way.”
Another woman tweeted: “Genuinely, end it with them if they don’t see the issue of that man being president. Put yourself first. Put your body first.”
Radical lib women are melting down after Donald Trump's landslide victory saying they will join the 4B movement and refuse to date men, get married, have sex with men, or have children.
See, I told you Donald Trump would be the most pro-life president in history.
“Young men expect sex, but they also want us to not be able to have access to abortion. They can’t have both,” Michaela Thomas, an artist in Georgia, said.
Thomas continued: “Young women don’t want to be intimate with men who don’t fight for women’s rights; it’s showing they don’t respect us.”
A man posted: “I am a firm supporter of the 4B movement. I would be thrilled if more young women trust in Jesus and marry solid Christian men. But if the only alternative is promiscuity and baby murder, then by all means, 4B away.”
Many on the right sarcastically mocked the ‘ultra feminist’ movement. Red State’s Brandon Morse said: “This makes an excellent point about women’s sexuality.
Apparently radical woke feminist are starting a 4B movement and not dating or talking to men while Trump is President.
Personally, I think this is good news and saves men from future headaches dealing with these lunatics pic.twitter.com/hUf3nKRFX5
“They went so left they started going right, claiming they’re going to stop being hoes and won’t put out until men respect them. That’s what we’ve been saying you should do all along.”
Another said: “I think that liberal women are finally starting to understand what pro-life conservative women have been telling them for years …”
Whilst a third penned: “Then why wouldn’t you do this so you don’t need an abortion?
“If you can abstain because of Trump, why not abstain to save a baby? These people are stupid.”
‘We are really afraid that this will jeopardise the school.’ Since a lesson on depictions of hell in poetry from the Middle Ages to the 18th century, a suffocating climate has settled over the Lycée Condorcet in Limay (Yvelines)… A teacher was threatened and falsely accused of blasphemy. (…)
In October, during a French lesson entitled ‘Bienvenue en Enfer’ (Welcome to Hell), a pupil in a tenth grade class asked the teacher to show ‘pictures’ depicting this concept among Muslims (…) ‘I explained to the pupils what I had seen on the internet. It was contrary to my values. Out of respect for [those] of the Muslim faith, out of respect for other faiths and out of respect for the school, I explained that I would not show them, but that they were free to do their own research’ (…).
Another student responded in an accusatory manner: ‘Madam, what you are saying is terrible. You are saying that you have seen the Prophet with women in hell. Misunderstanding? Provocation? Impudence?
He threatens his teacher: ‘By the way, madam, when do you get off work today? I think you finish early on Tuesdays? And on Thursday too?’ On leaving the classroom he even said: ‘Madame, take care of yourself when you come home tonight…’. (…)
But that’s not the end of the story. In the days that followed, the first pupil who wanted to see pictures of hell from an Islamic perspective strangely returned to every lesson and insistently asked the teacher to show these pictures to the class. The teacher, who has been on sick leave ever since, does not give in. ‘ Their behaviour becomes more and more aggressive as the days go by,’ she states in another report. (…)
According to other sources, the two boys – against whom disciplinary proceedings have been initiated – and their families are unknown to the police and are said to show no signs of radicalisation of any kind. (…)
‘Tuesday, October 15: A maths teacher sees a pupil enter her classroom. Without looking at the blackboard or the pupils, he approaches her and asks if she is a French teacher. She points out that he is not one of her pupils. No answer’. No connection can currently be made between the initial misunderstanding and this intrusion. (…)
The affair, which has been affecting the Condorcet high school in Limay (Yvelines) for almost a month, is being taken very seriously by the state authorities. (…) Actu.fr
