Charlotte Gill is an independent journalist who researches the bizarre and outrageous woke projects that British taxpayers are unwittingly funding. This is a clip from Charlotte’s longer #NCFWhittle interview. To watch the full interview please click here: • Woke Waste: The Millions British Taxp…
Month: October 2024
Swiss tourist’s throat slit in Algeria under the cry of ‘Allahu Akbar’
According to sources in Algeria obtained by Le Figaro, the victim was sitting on the terrace of a café when a man pounced on her, slit her throat with a stabbing weapon and shouted ‘Allah Akbar’. According to our sources, the fleeing attacker was caught by members of the public.
A video circulating on social media shows the suspected attacker lying on the ground, wearing black jogging bottoms and a grey T-shirt. Surrounding him, Algerians film him and shout: ‘Handcuff him, handcuff him’.
The motives for this attack – an operation by an armed Islamist group active in the region or an individual act by a radical who wants to mess with the Westerners – are still unclear.
The attack is reminiscent of the attack on French citizen Hervé Gourdel in 2014. The 55-year-old mountain guide was kidnapped in Algeria in September 2014 by the Jund al-Khilafa group, which belongs to the Islamic State (IS) group, while he was on a trekking tour in Kabylia. The terrorists had granted then French President François Hollande 24 hours to stop the airstrikes in Iraq before beheading their hostage. Le Figaro
Belgium revokes work permits of imams over ‘foreign influence’ rules
Five Turkish imams who had been living in Belgium for four years face losing their jobs and possible deportation from Belgium due to a Flemish regulation designed to limit foreign influence.
The five imams were denied work permit renewals after the Flemish Government discovered they were receiving funding from the Turkish State, which is not permitted under state-level law.
Since May 2024, the Flemish Government in Belgium has barred economic migrants from being financed by foreign governments.
The five Imams worked in mosques in Antwerp, Sint-Niklaas, Ghent, Diest, and Lommel and were reportedly linked to the Diyanet network, which has direct ties to President Recep Erdogan’s regime in Turkey.
Flemish labour minister Zuhal Demir said the decision to deny the permit renewals stemmed from growing concerns about foreign interference.
“I am taking a firm stand against these practices. We must act quickly and firmly in such cases. We cannot simply overlook it,” she said in a press release.
There have been concerns that some individuals may have used their position, upon arrival in Belgium, to promote Erdogan’s agenda and undermine Belgian values by going against the country’s social norms.
Diyanet-affiliated mosques have previously been flagged for promoting allegedly homophobic views.
“This funding model is part of Turkish doctrines that directly control the mosques,” Demir stated.
“You cannot separate the Diyanet network from the authoritarian Erdogan regime that rules in Ankara.”
For Team Fouad Adhir, a Belgian Muslim and minority-interest party, the decision represented a provocation.
“I’m not going to engage in this provocative debate,” party leader Fouad Adhir told Brussels Signal.
Demir’s decision to revoke the imams’ work permits could also be seen as an attempt to circumvent the Belgian Constitutional Court’s 2023 ruling that deemed a ban on foreign funding of religious communities unconstitutional.
“The condition that foreign funding or support undermines the independence of a local religious community is not precise enough. It is a disproportionate interference with freedom of worship,” the Belgian Constitutional Court had ruled.
Now that their applications for new work permits have been rejected, the five Imams have three months to find another employer.
If they do not, the federal immigration service can decide to permanently remove them from the country.
They can also appeal the decision if they file an objection with the Council of State within 60 days.
In 2023, 66 work permit applications were submitted in Flanders by ministers of a recognised religion. Of these, 48 were ultimately approved. For 2024, the count stands at 36 out of 51 applications that have received approval.
Belgium revokes work permits of Imams over ‘foreign influence’
Kamala’s narcissistic rage: What we’re up against, continued
By John B. Carpenter
Kamala was stabbing the air with her index finger, fuming; Bret Baier had touched a nerve when he informed Kamala that 79% of Americans believe the country is on the wrong track, and she’s the incumbent. Then he had the audacity to allow Satan himself speak — via video clip — by playing his — I mean Trump’s — response to Kamala’s claims. That was the paper straw that broke the McDonald’s employee’s back. Her famously vicious temper appeared; we’d heard the reports of it surfacing behind the scenes at her staff when Kamala exposed her vacuity. She once attempted to deflect a reporter’s question about why she, the “border czar,” hadn’t been to the border with a flippant “and I haven’t been to Europe.” She blamed that, reportedly, on her aides. Consequently, over 90% of her staff quits. With Baier, Kamala was furious and she showed what we’re up against.
We’re up against her narcissism and the collective narcissism of the left. Narcissism is characterized by delusions of grandiosity. As in my last American Thinker article, “The Advent of Idiocracy,” one of the defining characteristics of American liberals is their pretensions to be “the best and the brightest.” Such pretensions lead to visceral reactions to any dissent. If narcissists claim that Trump’s “the enemy within” comments are threats to use the military to crack down on domestic critics, pushing back on that absurd claim, regardless of how politely the rejection is delivered, “will be considered an attack on their superiority.” (The irony that they’re exhibiting the same intolerance they’re ascribing to others is invisible to them.) The result is “narcissistic rage.”
That is what we witnessed when Kamala was stabbing her finger in the air and furiously declaring, “You and I both know [something that neither Baier nor any informed person knows].” (Truth to the narcissist is what the narcissist insists it is.) In her fury, Kamala charged, Trump “has talked about turning the American military on the American people.” (Actually, he hasn’t, but don’t let the facts get in your way, Kamala.) “He has talked about going after people who are engaged in peaceful protest.” (In 2020, she raised funds to release rioters and now she’s fabricating charges against Trump for suppressing peaceful demonstrations.) “He has talked about locking people up because they disagree with him.” (She is just making stuff up.) “This is a democracy.” (I know, it’s a constitutional republic, but let’s let that slide for now.) “And in a democracy, the president of the United States, in the United States of America” (typical Kamala verbiage) “should be willing to be able to handle criticism without saying he’d lock people up for doing it.” (She can’t handle pointed questions without exploding into narcissistic rage.) “And this is what is at stake.” Indeed.
What’s at stake is our “democracy,” although not in the way she defines it. When Kamala talks about “democracy,” she means the rule of the “demos” — the people — who vote for her. The emphasis is on “our” and that doesn’t include you. Their rule is in danger from Trump because he might persuade enough people to vote for him. If that happens, “democracy” — in her understanding — will have been lost. For the narcissist, “Others either exist to meet their needs or may as well not exist at all” (Frank S. LaBella). So, the only “demos” who matter are those who exist to meet the needs of the Democrats to be elected. The rest of us may as well not exist at all. They are “democracy,” even when we win elections.
Last year, I wrote here about how the left is full of people who are so convinced of their correctness that they cannot fathom how anyone could see things differently. They can assure Elon that they share his vision of an open marketplace of ideas, yet they will immediately censor Matt Walsch’s What Is a Woman?. They genuinely believe they are champions of “democracy” even as they suppress opposing opinions. They equate their opinions with the truth, viewing any deviation from them not merely as an error but as an act of hate. And they’re permitted to hate what (and who) they deem hateful, which means, for now, Trump, eventually you. That’s what we’re up against. Kamala is cut from that same cloth.
So, when, for the first time in this presidential election, she was seriously questioned, the veil of niceness and joy™ slipped, revealing her narcissistic rage. Her handlers frantically waved to Baier to end the interview.
Narcissistic rage is an intense emotional reaction when the unquestionable — like the high-caste Kamala, child of professors — sense a threat to their grandiose self-image. Narcissistic rage manifests suddenly and disproportionately. Baier inquired about feelings of discontent among many Americans and allowed Trump to speak for himself via video. Her furious reaction was out of proportion to the question, which could hardly be described as a provocation. Unlike typical anger, which usually has a clear trigger, narcissistic rage is incited by perceived slights or criticisms, such as daring to question her highness. It’s also triggered when the narcissist feels she is not receiving the admiration she’s certain she deserves. Hence the stabbing finger, the fury at Baier for not schmoozing and effusing about how good she smells, like a previous interviewer.
What’s at stake for Kamala is her “democracy,” her people ruling through her. Depriving her of that, even if with the truth and fairly won elections, if possible, is, in her view, unacceptable. It deserves rage because she deserves — with certitude in her mind — the presidency.
William Butler Yeats warned us that in the coming times, the worst would be “full of a passionate intensity.” Now, one of those “worst” is running for president.
Scottish National Party slammed for claiming there are ’24 genders’
As the UK’s Labour Party doubles down on opposition to puberty blockers and other transgender surgeries for minors, the Scottish National Party is going, once again, in the opposite direction. The SNP released a handy definitive list of “genders” attached to their guidance for public bodies in Scotland who collect data on sex and gender. Included in this list of very real, not at all made-up genders are: “Cisgender,” “trans man,” “trans woman,” “non-binary,” “trans-not otherwise specified,” “genderfluid,” “genderqueer,” “pangender,” “autigender,” and “questioning.”
My favorite of these (are we allowed to have favorites?) is “agender,” which the SNP defines as “a person who does not identify as having a gender.” This is a neat trick, I think: Someone’s identification as being someone with no gender is now officially their gender. I’ll bet the “agenders” didn’t see that coming. Then again, we didn’t see them coming, so I suppose we’re even. A Scottish Government spokesperson stated: “The point of the survey is to collect information on the respondents’ trans history and how they would define it. It is therefore important that the survey is designed in such a way that allows that information to be captured.”
Of course, all this list really does is remind everyone how thoroughly the SNP has been captured. Feminist campaigner Ann Sinnott, directory of the Authentic Equity Alliance, succinctly referred to the SNP’s list as “crazy.” JK Rowling, who now improbably runs what is easily the funniest account on X, responded with her own identity demands:
Rowling dunking on transgender activists is now a feature of X, but I’m old enough to remember fifteen minutes ago, when mocking gender ideology was social death. The fact that it is now par for the course says something about the extent to which transgender activists have lost their grip on the narrative, and that is positive news. If there is one thing LGBT activists cannot stand, it is being laughed at.
This list, many media outlets noted, comes after First Minister John Swinney admitted back in July that there are only two genders (which is to say that sex and gender are the same thing), despite previously backing Nicola Sturgeon’s transgender activism during her tenure. I suspect this is far more common than most realize. Many liberal politicians who are obediently parroting the lines handed to them by the LGBT activists who have them firmly in their grip don’t actually believe any of this stuff. They don’t believe there are 24 (or more) genders. They just say they do because they’re afraid of the men in dresses.
These politicians don’t believe in pregnant men, or brawny, bearded women, or any of this stuff. To their shame, they push it anyway – because they are cowards. I could cite specific examples of well-known politicians who nod along respectfully to all of this stuff in public while making fun of it in private. Ironically for them, the transgender activists they are making fun of are still powerful enough to get them to lie in public, so the joke is on them, and ultimately on all of us. The fever is starting to break due to the courage of fed-up elites like Elon Musk and J.K. Rowling, but transgender mania only got as far as it did due to the cowardice of men like John Swinney.
If the media really wanted to find out how many of these Scottish National Party lemmings genuinely believe that there are 24 genders, there is an easy way they could find out. At a couple of press conferences, without warning, just ask these politicians to name some. To make it easy, just ask them to name ten of the genders they allegedly believe in. I’d bet good money that not a single one of them could do it.
UK: Trans-Identified Male Sentenced To 40 Months In Prison After Creating Child Pornography, Contacting A 9-Year-Old Girl For Sexual Abuse
A trans-identified male from Chester, UK, has been sentenced to 40 months in prison after being found in possession of child sexual abuse images and attempting to contact a child for sexual abuse. Chloee-Mae Danvers, 25, was a player with the “Trans & Enby Football Club in Liverpool.”
Danvers, previously known as Thomas Quinn, was already a “prolific” registered sex offender when he was caught hoarding child sexual abuse materials on July 15. Officers with the Sex Offenders Management Unit attended Danvers’ home address on Housman Close as part of their routine checks, and inspected his electronic devices in accordance with his conditions.
Upon doing so, officers located two Category A indecent images of children in a deleted folder stored on Danvers’ mobile phone. According to the Crown Prosecution Service, Category A child pornography is defined as depicting “penetrative sexual activity, sexual activity with an animal or sadism.” At that time, Danvers also admitted to attempting to wipe his laptop of evidence.
Despite the seriousness of the crime, Danvers was released into the community awaiting a hearing on charges of creating indecent images of children. But just weeks later, police became aware that Danvers had been using an undeclared social media account to communicate with a minor.
On August 5, officers seized Danvers’ electronic devices and found he had been attempting to make sexual contact with a 9-year-old girl. He had also been sharing Category A and Category B child sexual abuse images via the internet using social media accounts he had kept private from police.
Today, Danvers was sentenced to 40 months in prison during an appearance at Chester Crown Court.
Following his sentencing, Cheshire Police issued a statement in which Detective Constable Stephen Park referred to Danvers by “they/them” pronouns.
“Danvers is a prolific sex offender and an incredibly dangerous individual, and I welcome the sentence handed to them today,” Park said. “They were left with no choice but to plead guilty after a catalogue of evidence was gathered against them – including evidence of indecent material involving young children being discovered on their device.”
Cheshire Police had previously referred to Danvers as a “man” in their initial press release on his July arrest.
As previously reported by Reduxx, Danvers was active in his local LGBT community prior to his arrest, and had publicly identified himself as being a player with the “Trans & Enby Football Club in Liverpool.” On a GoFundMe page, the club describes itself as “centering trans and non-binary folks” along with the wider LGBT+ community.
“Too often, queer folks are sidelined in mainstream sports, but in our club, trans people are the majority,” the club notes in the fundraiser’s description. “Your contribution will help us grow our club, enabling us to reach more trans people in Liverpool, and build on our proud community club,” they add, claiming that the money will be spent on training sessions and kit. Their Instagram page has been locked down, and it is unclear whether the club is aware of Danvers’ conviction.
In 2022, Danvers attempted to raise just under £1,400 on GoFundMe for a private gender transition. “Hi, my name is Chloee, and I have gender dysphoria. I was born male, but I desire to be a woman. My only option is to go private with the Harley Street Gender Clinic in Marylebone,” Danvers wrote on the since-deleted page.
“My goal is to transition into a woman entirely, and these funds would go towards me getting to London and paying for the consultations.”
On his X profile, Danvers frequently discussed his love for science fiction, notably Star Trek. In 2005, detectives from the Child Exploitation Section of the Toronto Sex Crimes Unit claimed that of the over 100 offenders they had arrested in the previous four years, “all but one” was a “hard-core Trekkie.”
Germany: Eritrean asylum seeker arrested in stabbing attack right after release from prison for previous stabbing attack
Only four months after his release from prison, knifeman Khalid O. stabbed and seriously injured another person. The 29-year-old should have been deported to Eritrea long ago, but Germany cannot get rid of him.
Investigators are now convinced that Khalid O. stabbed a Libyan (33) in an apartment in Dresden, presumably over drugs. According to sources,, the victim suffered severe back injuries and was taken to a hospital.
“The investigating judge issued an arrest warrant for attempted manslaughter in conjunction with dangerous bodily harm,” said senior public prosecutor Jürgen Schmidt, according to German newspaper Bild.
The Eritrean was only released from prison on June 11, 2024, having served four years in prison for grievous bodily harm after attacking three refugees, also in Dresden-Gorbitz. Khalid O. had rammed his knife into one of the victim’s stomach and chest, and tried to stab another in the neck, while the third was seriously injured after jumping out of the window in fear.
When the police arrested the Eritrean, he had three knives in his trouser pocket.
Khalid O. was also considered a problem prisoner while in prison. He spat at and insulted justice employees, attacked fellow prisoners, and tried to dig his way under the security fence with his bare hands.
Just six days after his release from prison, the Eritrean, who came to Germany during the refugee wave of 2015, caused a riot in a police station. He then hit a train employee who caught him riding the train without a ticket. When the police later arrested him, he again had a kitchen knife in his pants pocket.
The Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (BAMF) revoked the Eritrean’s “protection status as an asylum seeker,” and sought a deportation. However, Khalid O. immediately filed a lawsuit against the BAMF’s decision.
Until a verdict is reached, he is officially “tolerated” and therefore may not be taken into deportation detention or custody pending departure.
The responsible State Directorate of Saxony has not yet provided any information on the current status of the procedure.
However, even if the knife-wielding man loses in court, he will be able to stay because he does not have a passport.
“The person concerned does not have the necessary travel documents,” confirms regional directorate spokeswoman Valerie Eckl.
‘Far Right’ Isn’t a Threat to Britain, It’s the FAR LEFT & ISLAMISTS
Lord Blunkett says British values are under threat from the “Far Right” and has urged the government to teach children about democracy, free speech and tolerance. NCF Senior Fellow Rafe Heydel-Mankoo says these things are under threat – but the threat isn’t the so-called Far Right, it’s the Far Left.
Prominent Italian priest claims Francis is not the pope in viral sermon
Father Giorgio Maria Faré Veritatem facientes in Caritate / YouTube
Famous Italian priest Father Giorgio Maria Faré said in an October 13 sermon, which now has over 38,000 views, that he believes Francis is not a true pope because Pope Benedict XVI did not fully resign his office.
Faré claimed Benedict didn’t properly resign from the papacy and remained pope until his death in 2022. The priest also charged that Pope Francis was doubtfully elected and Benedict intentionally didn’t resign.
Francis is not the pope
Faré opened his sermon by explaining that in recent years, he has spent a great amount of time discerning the state of the Church and after much prayer and reflection, he has come to an uncomfortable conclusion.
“[A] priest must choose whether to preach what Sacred Scripture and the Church have always taught or to adhere to what the so-called Pope Francis teaches in his ordinary magisterium. Yes, you understood correctly. I said the so-called Pope Francis. What I am telling you today… is that for over eleven years, a man recognized as Pope by the majority has been sitting on the Chair of Peter, but he is not, however, the legitimate Pope,” Faré said.
Benedict’s resignation was invalid
Faré then dove into why he believed Pope Benedict’s resignation was invalid, namely that it was a declaration, not a formal abdication, and it lacked the act of resignation.
“The formula: ‘I declare to renounce,’ in legal terms, is not the same as saying, ‘I renounce.’ The Pope [Benedict] should have said, ‘I declare to renounce, as in fact, I renounce,’ or a similar formula. As it was pronounced, Benedict XVI’s declaration is, in fact, only a declaration, not a legally valid act, nor was it followed by any ratification.”
The priest then underscored that Benedict chose the title Declaratio, or “Declaration,” for his official resignation instead of “resignation” or “abdication.”
Faré added that Benedict’s resignation lacked the will to renounce the papacy. The priest highlighted that in his original Latin declaration, Benedict used the term ministerium, which refers to the visible execution of the papal office. But, citing Canon 332 §2 of the 1983 Code of Canon Law, Faré claims that for the resignation to be valid, he would have needed to resign from the munus, the “office” of the papacy.
Francis is a heretic whose election is doubtful
Circling back to Francis, Faré claimed his 2013 election is doubtful because a coalition of four radically liberal Cardinals, who are allegedly members of the St. Gallen Mafia: Cormac Murphy-O’Connor, Walter Kasper, Godfried Danneels, and Karl Lehmann, conspired for years to make Francis the pope in order to start a revolution in the Church. The priest added that this alleged conspiracy would violate articles 79-82 of Pope John Paul II’s motu proprio on electing a new pontiff, Universi Dominici Gregis.
The priest also stressed that he believes Pope Francis is a heretic and cited several heretical statements and promulgations, such as in Amoris Laetitia, in which Francis opened the door to allowing couples in adulterous relationships to receive Holy Communion, the Abu Dhabi Declaration, in which Francis said that the “diversity of religions” is “willed by God,” and Francis’s recent statement to an inter-religious meeting in Singapore that “every religion is a way to arrive at God.”
But Faré emphasized that he believes Francis is an antipope first because Benedict’s resignation was invalid, not because he is a heretic. Francis’s heresies instead serve as evidence that Benedict did not resign from the papacy, according to Faré.
“This legal fact has theological repercussions: without a valid election, the consequent lack of divine investiture means that Bergoglio lacks the assistance of the Holy Spirit. If he were the Pope, he would be assisted by the Holy Spirit, like every Roman Pontiff, not only when pronouncing ex-cathedra but also in the ordinary magisterium.”
Benedict knew his resignation was invalid
Faré further posited that Benedict planned on making his resignation invalid, which is why, in his declaratio, he wrote, “I renounce,” instead of “I declare to renounce,” and resigned from the ministerium and not the munus. The priest noted that Benedict likely took this action because he knew of the St. Gallen Mafia’s plans.
“The Pope thus found himself at a crossroads: either allow an antipope to be secretly elected upon his death or attempt a strategy to foil the enemies of the Church by issuing a declaration with no legal effect. Incidentally, I point out that — even after the Declaratio — an invalid Conclave could have been avoided. The Cardinals who noticed the anomalies in the Declaratio… could have immediately raised the issue and prevented a Conclave from being convened. This did not happen, so it is important to note that the actual responsibility for what happened should not be placed on Benedict XVI but, rather, primarily on those who understood and remained silent in bad faith.”
The priest then suggested that Benedict left several more clues that he retained the papal office after the conclave for the Church’s prelates to pick up on and take appropriate action, such as using the title “Pope Emeritus,” continuing to wear his white cassock, and retaining his papal coat of arms.
Other theories on whether Francis is the pope
Over the years, several other Catholic prelates and thinkers have suggested that Francis is not the pope, including Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, who has posited that Francis lacked the necessary intention to become pope. Viganò has also called for an official investigation into Pope Benedict’s resignation and the 2013 conclave due to apparent irregularities. Others, too, have said Francis’ past statements and promulgations disqualify him from being a true pope regardless of the nature of Benedict’s resignation.
On the other hand, Bishop Athanasius Schneider has stated that “nobody has the power to judge Francis’s status as pope” because previous writings about a pope becoming a heretic, such as St. Robert Bellarmine’s, are only opinions, not doctrine, and that there is no one within the Church who has the power to declare him a heretic. “[I]n the case of a heretical pope, the members of the Church can avoid him, resist him, refuse to obey him, all of which can be done without requiring a theory or opinion that says that a heretical pope automatically loses his office or can be deposed consequently,” Schneider wrote.
To read Fr. Faré’s full sermon in English, click here.
‘I’m definitely upgrading my security’: Leftist German Magazine Der Spiegel Calls Elon Musk ‘Enemy Number Two’ – Tech Billionaire Comments on the ‘Vitriolic Hatred’ (VIDEO)
With his electric cars and rockets, Elon Musk was once a very well-liked figure in liberal circles.
But his work for free-speech on social platform X and his ‘all-in’ support for Donald J. Trump’s Presidential campaign have put him in the crosshairs of the planetary leftist hatred.
Now the leftist German Magazine Der Spiegel has crystalized this hatred in a strong cover story: ‘Elon Musk, Enemy Number Two’. Elon Musk: Staatsfeind Nummer Zwei – DER SPIEGEL (behind a paywall).
This took the internet by Storm, especially the X social media platform.
On Sunday (20), during town hall discussion in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Musk commented on the ‘vitriolic hatred’ by the left, and said that he planned to upgrade his security after the Der Spiegel quite literal hit-piece.
On his event in support of Donald Trump’s candidacy, the talked about the heightened political atmosphere.
Fox News reported:
“He noted he was recently on the cover of Der Spiegel, which labeled him ‘Public Enemy No. 2’ – the first being Trump.
‘I’m like, enemy number 2 of what? Uh, democracy? I mean I’m pro-democracy. I’m literally trying to uphold the Constitution and ensure we have a free and fair election’, Musk said, eliciting applause from the crowd.
[…] ‘I’m definitely upgrading my security. Guess I better cancel that open-car parade’, Musk said, a seeming nod to the 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy.”
As one would expect, Musk said he was a “little shook” by the ‘level of vitriolic hatred on the left’.
“’They claim they’re tolerant. And yet, they’re incredibly intolerant and spewing hate’, Musk said. ‘Whereas on the right I see people who tend to regard people on the left as, well, misguided. But they don’t hate them… but the amount of hate coming from the left is like, wow, next level’.”
It was indeed this unbridled leftist hatred that took the billionaire to embark on the support for Donald Trump, after the July assassination attempt of the MAGA leader during a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.
By September, a second attempt on Trump’s life while he was playing a round of golf at his club in West Palm Beach, only solidified Musk’s commitment.
Now Musk is out in the key battleground state of Pennsylvania to rally support for Trump and to encourage people to vote.