‘Hundreds of refugees in Germany have visited their homelands,’ report states

Hundreds of refugees have travelled back from Germany to their home countries for vacations since the beginning of 2023.

That was despite seeking asylum in Germany and asserting their need for assistance due to various reasons — ranging from political persecution to war in their home countries.

Answering questions from the Alternative for Germany Party (AfD), the German Government acknowledged the numbers, German news outlet Apollo News reported on October 24.

Iraqis made up the largest group, with 172 people vacationing in Iraq. Separately, 102 people returned to Syria and 37 to Afghanistan.

As there is no legal obligation for refugees to report these trips, it has been suggested by experts that the real number, including unreported trips, was much higher.

The German Government considers Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan as too dangerous to deport people to.

German asylum law stipulates that travel by beneficiaries of protection to their countries of origin can have serious consequences, including the revocation of protection and termination of residence in Germany.

A draft law has been proposed for automatically revoking the protection status of refugees if they make trips to their home countries – except if those trips were regarded as morally imperative, for example when a family member is ill.

It said it would also introduce a notification obligation for such trips.

These changes would not be part of the government’s “security package”, legislation aimed at strengthening security after a terrorist knife attack in Solingen in August last year.

While replying to questions from the AfD Party, the government further admitted it did not have data on how many illegal migrants were currently in Germany.

There is no information in the Central Register of Foreigners about whether foreigners have arrived in the country illegally or legally.

While the number of asylum applications is known, it is unclear how many illegal immigrants there are actually in Germany.

Since 2014, there have been three million asylum applications in Germany, according to official statistics.

Critics have said the fact that the government did not know how many illegal migrants there were in Germany revealed “a dramatic loss of control”, especially given several high-profile crimes and terrorist attacks by asylum seekers in recent times.

In the past number of years, knife crime has become a controversial issue, particularly regarding that involving people with an immigration background.

‘Hundreds of refugees in Germany have visited their homelands,’ report states – Brussels Signal

Dear Europe: happy submission! In France alone, currently, more than 410 new mosques are being built

Great Mosque of Strasbourg iStock

by Giulio Meotti

It is difficult not to give in to pessimism, as the great Algerian novelist Boualem Sansal, author of “2084”, does when he says this week: “Islam is preparing to conquer France”.

The environmentalist municipality of the city of Strasbourg, which houses one of the two wings of the European Parliament, the European Court of Human Rights and the Council of Europe, has decided to turn off the cathedral’s lights at 11 pm “to save energy and money”.

Every evening since the end of August, Strasbourg Cathedral has been in darkness. The green municipality has decided to immerse the religious building in darkness to be “exemplary at a time when efforts to reduce energy consumption are being asked of all citizens”.

Strasbourg Cathedral, whose construction began in 1176, is the fifth tallest in the world. A jewel of Gothic art with light filtering through the stained glass windows, the historiated portal and the famous “Pillar of the Angels”, which Victor Hugo called “a marvel of grandeur and grace”.

An exemplary story.

The same city council of Strasbourg has, in fact, arranged for the financing of 2.5 million euros for the construction of an immense Turkish mosque at the behest of the Green mayor Jeanne Barseghian.

That means 44 meters high for the minarets, 28 domes, a prayer room for 3,000 faithful and another outdoor space for 2,500 people, “the largest mosque in Europe” had a subsidy of 2.5 million and financial help from Qatar, a country whose royal house is in tears these hours for the killing of the head of Hamas, Yahya Sinwar.

The mosque financed by the city of Strasbourg is built by a country, Erdogan’s Turkey, which makes no secret of wanting to Islamize Europe.

Where does the mentality come from that leads them to cut the cathedral lighting to save 1,728 euros a month, when they vote for a subsidy of 2.5 million euros for the construction of the Islamist Eyyub Sultan mosque in the city? There are no logical or rational explanations: the only answer is submission.

This summer, the city of Metz donated €490,000 for the construction of the new mosque. Three years ago, the first stone was laid for a gigantic building of 5,649 m2, equipped with a museum for immigration and an institute for the Arab world, with a 34-meter minaret that can accommodate 1,500 Muslims.

In Clichy, where Muslims have been praying in the street for years in the face of secularism, the Great Mosque will open: €270,000 in subsidies from the municipality.

In Strasbourg there is not only the Great Mosque designed by the Italian architect Paolo Portoghesi (the same one who built the Great Mosque of Rome) and financed by Morocco, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. The Great Mosque has already received funds from municipal and regional governments.

Strasbourg today has 22 mosques.

Boualem Sansal said that “France has made agreements with the Islamists: there were 10 mosques once, today there are 3,000”.

And currently, more than 410 new mosques are being built. Some are already under construction, others are raising the necessary funds. It is not difficult to understand why there are already more Muslim believers than Catholics.

After October 7, the city of Strasbourg removed the Israeli flag raised in solidarity with the victims of Islamic terrorism after just 36 hours.

Happy submission!

Dear Europe: happy submission! | Israel National News – Arutz Sheva

Kamala Loses One-Person CNN Debate – Even the state media can’t cover for her anymore

As we enter the final stretch of election season, every day seems to bring another Trump/Vance victory in spite of a hostile media, and another embarrassing loss by the Harris/Walz campaign. Recently, for example, Trump endeared himself to regular Americans by putting on an apron and working the McDonald’s drive-thru; conversely, McDonald’s dealt a fatal blow to Kamala’s claim she had worked for them as a teenager by releasing a statement declaring they could find no evidence of that. She is looking more and more like the most hapless, brainless, inauthentic, unqualified presidential nominee in modern history, if not ever. Even the state media like CNN can’t cover for her anymore, as evidenced by the tepid assessments of CNN commentators in the wake of Kamala’s recent CNN town hall hosted by Anderson Cooper.

To recap: when the Democrats realized that Joe Biden could no longer be propped up as their 2024 candidate, they found themselves painted into a corner. The Democrat kingmakers – Barack Obama, Susan Rice, and Valerie Jarrett – needed to step in and depose the decrepit Biden but didn’t want to fall back on Vice President Harris, whom they knew was devoid of accomplishments, likeability, brains, and presidential charisma, but how could they not go with her? Running the vice president as the nominee would ordinarily be the obvious move; leap-frogging over Kamala and selecting someone else would be a clear acknowledgement that she had never been anything but a diversity hire. And how could the party of identity politics not go with a “woman of color”? It would discredit their entire ideology.

So they rolled the dice and installed Kamala, knowing she was not ready for prime time but counting on a supportive media and a strategy of painting Trump as Hitler 2.0 to get her over the finish line. But in the ensuing months she has not only not risen to the occasion, she and her campaign are flailing to such an extent that all they have left is to fear-monger hysterically about Trump as A Threat to Democracy™.

Then came CNN’s Wednesday evening town hall in Philadelphia. David Urban nailed it when he declared afterward that she lost a one-person debate. A couple of examples of her prevaricating and fumbling will suffice to give a sense of just how badly the event went for her.

When Cooper hit her with a question she should have seen coming from a mile away – is Trump’s idea of a border wall actually “stupid,” as she had initially called it? – she panicked immediately and rambled about Trump until Cooper interjected to get her back on track. As an open borders enthusiast who plans to give citizenship to millions of illegals in the country, she had the nerve to say that there needs to be a legal process for immigration and that she will secure the border. Cooper flustered her further by pressing: “So you don’t think the idea of a border wall is stupid anymore?” and she responded again by attacking Trump and complaining that “he didn’t do much of anything” with the wall.

This is the Border Czar who has been in office for four years and overseen a tsunami of illegal migration that will surely prove to be the greatest security debacle for America since the 9/11 attacks.

As another example, Cooper asked, “Is there something you can point to in your life, political life, or in your life in the last four years that you think is a mistake that you have learned from? This is the kind of “what do you consider your greatest weakness” question that the average job applicant would know to be prepared for, but apparently Kamala’s team didn’t think to drill her on this or any other obvious question.

“I mean, I’ve, I’ve made many mistakes, and they range from, you know, if you’ve ever parented a child, you know, you make lots of mistakes, too, in my role as vice president,” Kamala replied, giggling to try to connect with the audience. Not even Cooper cracked a smile. “I mean, I’ve probably worked very hard at making sure that I am well versed on issues, and I think that is very important.”

This was an embarrassment, first of all because she didn’t have an answer for the question. Second, her comment about parenting a child fell flat because Kamala doesn’t have any children. Her husband Doug Emhoff’s two kids from another marriage were already 20 and 15 years old when Kamala became their stepmom. She knows less about parenting than she does about economics.

In a discussion afterward, CNN propagandists were forced to admit that, as Dana Bash put it, Kamala didn’t “close the deal” with undecided voters in this town hall. Jake Tapper complained that the Vice President “focused a lot more on Donald Trump” than on her own policies. In fact, she didn’t even attack his policies; she simply denounced him repeatedly in unhinged terms as a dangerous fascist.

On a different CNN panel, David Axelrod expressed his concern that

when she doesn’t want to answer a question, her habit is to kind of go to word salad city, and she did that on a couple of answers. One was on Israel. Anderson asked a direct question, would you be stronger on Israel than Trump? And there was a seven-minute answer, but none of it related to the question he was asking.

Van Jones agreed with Axelrod. While he did his best to put lipstick on a pig by claiming that he believes she will fight for the American people, Jones admitted that “the word salad stuff gets on my nerves. I think that some of the evasions are not necessary.”

Well, they’re necessary for Kamala because she does not have answers of substance to offer. She has to evade because she is hopelessly out of her depth. Every day Kamala Harris demonstrates that she is not any closer to being ready for prime time than the day her campaign began. The CNN commentators know it, the town hall’s 3.3 million viewers witnessed it, and the American people know it too.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/kamala-loses-one-person-cnn-debate/

Italian Justice Minister Calls for Disciplinary Action Against Biased Immigration Judge

Italy’s Justice Minister Carlo Nordio. Screen grab youtube

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s attempts at controlling migratory flows have brought her into conflict with her country’s courts. The court in Rome that invalidated the detention of a handful of migrants in a centre in Albania was put in its proper place after the government announced a decree that successfully amends previous legislation about who can designate migrants’ countries of origin as ‘safe.’ 

The civil court had ordered the Coast Guard to bring the migrants to Italy because it ruled their home countries, Egypt and Bangladesh, could not be considered safe. On Monday night, the Meloni government fought back by elevating the status of the ‘safe country’ decision from an interministerial decree to ‘primary law.’

Carlo Nordio, the Italian minister of justice, is now calling for sanctions against the judge involved in the case, who described the head of government Giorgia Meloni as “dangerous.”

Nordio posits that the magistrate of the Court of Cassation, Marco Patarnello, acted with partiality for political reasons and made objectionable and politicised comments about the head of government. In front of the deputies, Nordio pointed out that the magistrate was committed to loyal institutional collaboration “including in the diversity of opinions and despite divisions,” as President of the Republic Sergio Mattarella had recently invited him to do. 

In a letter to his fellow magistrates, Patarnello indeed described Giorgia Meloni as “dangerous”—even more so than former Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, even though she has not been convicted of a crime—because she acted according to her convictions. “Meloni has no judicial investigations against her, so she is not acting for personal interests but according to her political vision, and that makes her action much stronger, and also much more dangerous,” said Patarnello.

“This is a serious sentence that must be taken into consideration,” stressed Minister Nordio, who is calling for disciplinary action against the magistrate. Patarnello thus finds himself at the centre of media attention. The Magistratura Democratica association, to which Patarnello belongs and which hosts the mailing list where his letter was published, considers the public reaction disproportionate and is calling for a public discussion on guaranteeing the constitutional separation of the three powers. The Left is crying conspiracy and denouncing what they see as Meloni’s “victimisation.” Meloni’s ally Matteo Salvini sided with her, calling for Patarnello to be dismissed: “If anyone thinks that the Tribunal is a social centre and a place for political revenge, he is quite simply mistaken,” he explained.

https://europeanconservative.com/articles/news/italian-justice-minister-calls-for-disciplinary-action-against-biased-immigration-judge/

Ireland: Man forces his daughter-in-law to watch while he brutally rapes her mother; judge says sentence will be mitigated because he is a foreigner and speaks poor English

Screen grab youtube

A man who forced his stepdaughter to watch while he raped her mother has been jailed for 10 and a half years.

The 54-year-old was convicted earlier this year at the Central Criminal Court of offences including sexual assault, sexual exploitation of a child, oral rape, assault causing harm and making threats to kill against his stepdaughter.

He was further convicted of offences against his wife, including rape, oral rape, assault causing harm, assault causing serious harm and making a threat. All of the offences took place at the family home in Co Tipperary.

The man cannot be named to protect the anonymity of his victims. The court heard he did not accept the verdicts of the jury.

Imposing sentence on Thursday, Ms Justice Siobhan Lankford said it was an aggravating feature the incidents took place in the victims’ home and they were “afraid to breathe a word of these events to anyone”.

The judge said forcing the stepdaughter to watch the rape of her mother, the threats of violence and the use of an axe in one incident were also aggravating.

She said the mitigation includes the man’s work history and that he is a foreign national with limited English.

The judge imposed a global sentence of 12 years and a half years with the final two years suspended on strict conditions, after taking the mitigation into account.

She directed the man to have no contact with either victim for life unless they request it. He must also place himself under the supervision of the Probation Service upon release.

Irish Examiner

UK Nanny State Introduces Supervised Toothbrushing

Screen grab youtube

Old school totalitarianism as imposed by tyrants like Joseph Stalin left some aspects of human behavior unregulated. In the UK, progressives are progressing to new extremes of suffocating control via Keir Starmer’s nanny state:

The Prime Minister gave the example of teaching children to brush their teeth as he suggested he could introduce more interventionist policies.

Starmer explains why Big Government needs to oversee the brushing of teeth:

‘But I’m afraid if the cost of not doing it is children actually losing their teeth before they’re 10 years old and or very, very good NHS staff having to use their skills to take teeth out instead of doing other things, then that seems to be a necessary measure.

‘I do think there are other things that we will, you know, put out there for the point of the consultation.’

A ban on outdoor smoking is reportedly planned, which would have the added benefit of protecting birds flying by from secondhand smoke.

Next, telescreens may be installed in all homes, so that bureaucrats can monitor compliance with exercise mandates.

Moonbattery UK Nanny State Introduces Supervised Toothbrushing – Moonbattery

German Foreign Minister Baerbock promotes journalist with Islamist background

The Federal Foreign Office has sponsored an Iraqi journalist with links to the Iranian mullah regime. Around 250,000 euros went to the left-wing ‘taz Panter Foundation’ for the ‘Her Turn’ project, reports the newspaper Die Welt. Hiba Elmajid then appeared on World Press Freedom Day on May 3, 2022 in a video produced by Annalena Baerbock’s (Green Party) ministry as an example of sponsored female journalists.
In it, she explained how dangerous her profession was in Iraq. Women in particular were being blackmailed and slandered, said Elmajid. According to research by Die Welt, however, she is someone who has been around. Before the project started in 2020, Elmajid worked regularly for Al-Ghadeer TV and Al-Nujaba TV. Both broadcasters are accused by US intelligence services of having links to Iran’s Islamist Revolutionary Guard.

The German Federal Foreign Office told the newspaper: ‘As far as the Federal Foreign Office is aware, Ms Elmajid ended her freelance work for the two media mentioned before the start of the project and is not currently working there.’ In addition, the selection was made by the ‘taz Panter Foundation’ and the project funding has now been completed.

The left-wing foundation defended the decision in favour of Elmajid with her background. The aim had been to ‘broaden both her journalistic and personal horizons’. She had been employed as a freelancer, had only reported on regional and social issues and had stopped working at the start of the project.

However, the Welt research unit found numerous contributions by Elmajid for the two Islamist broadcasters during the project period. She also commented on current politics in private posts on social networks – often with clear anti-American and anti-Israeli messages.

After the end of the project, Elmajid once again appeared on Al-Ghadeer TV as a journalist. Equipped with a black headscarf, Palestine scarf and microphone, she reported on the ‘Al-Aqsa Call Conference’ in Karbala. The conference called for a fight against ‘the criminal Zionist entity’.

According to the ‘taz Panter Foundation’, Elmajid worked for the broadcaster again for ‘economic reasons’. She has since been dismissed due to her international contacts, which she also made during the project.

Baerbock fördert Journalistin mit Islamismushintergrund

Syrian migrant who brutally stabbed a 4-year-old girl will serve no prison time

screen grab youtube

After a Syrian migrant stabbed a 4-year-old girl in Bavaria’s Allgäu region in Germany, nearly murdering her, he will not serve a day in prison. Instead, he has been sentenced to life in a psychiatric hospital. The judge also expressed anger that the case is being used as an argument in favor of immigration restriction by the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party.

Mohamed S. was given his sentence of life in a psychiatric hospital in the Ravensburg Regional Court. The public prosecutor had sought attempted murder, and the jury also convicted him of this charge.

The attack, which saw the migrant stab the little girl in a supermarket in Angen im Allgäu in April of this year, nearly killed her. At random, he plunged a 20-centimeter-long knife into the girl with “four powerful stabs.” The migrant deeply punctured the little girl’s intestines and stomach, tearing them to bits. He then ran away from the scene.

Mohamed S. was arrested shortly thereafter, while the mother raced to the hospital with her daughter inside a vehicle. She required emergency surgery to save her life.

However, the public prosecutor recommended psychiatric care for the Syrian man. The sentence is final and there will be no appeal.

The public prosecutor said it was clear that the man suffered from “paranoid schizophrenia in an acute phase” and said he is extremely dangerous. She said she had her doubts that he was capable of empathy.

“There is no sign of any improvement in the man, and there is still a risk that he will commit serious crimes,” she added.

Not only did the Syrian also have a Dutch passport, but the case was shown as an example of just how dangerous Europe’s policy of open borders has become. As Remix News previously reported, the court heard how Mohamed S. fled Syria via Turkey in 2015 and traveled the Balkan migratory route before entering Europe illegally and eventually being granted asylum in the Netherlands. By 2021, he had been granted Dutch citizenship, allowing him to move freely across the European Union.

In 2022, the Syrian national traveled to Saudi Arabia, seeking to stay there after obtaining a tourist visa. However, he was soon homeless, living in mosques, which resulted in altercations and his subsequent imprisonment.

Saudi Arabia, known for its strict immigration enforcement, deported Mohamed S. within two months back to the Netherlands. However, he traveled across the border to the German town of Wangen where he lived in homeless shelters and an asylum center before committing the heinous crime.

The judge in the case, Veiko Böhm, said it was “difficult to bear” that the AfD parliamentary group was making inquiries about the case. He said the party was exploiting the attempted murder.

“The knife attack has nothing to do with Islamist radicalism, it is solely the result of a mental illness,” he stated. He also added that a Swabian man, which is a reference to an ethnic German from the region, could also partake in such an attack, but in this case “there is no AfD parliamentary group that is making an application.” It is unclear what case he is referring to involving an ethnic German man who stabbed a child at random.

In July of this year, Remix News produced a review of some of the worst crimes migrants have committed against children. These cases are becoming more and more common due to mass immigration. The perpetrators are often given diagnoses of mental illness, which results in more lenient sentences in psychiatric institutions.

https://rmx.news/article/syrian-migrant-who-brutally-stabbed-a-4-year-old-girl-will-serve-no-prison-time/

US: Woke doctor refused to publish $10 million NIH study as it showed puberty blockers cause no improvement in mental health in children

(Images via NYPost/Getty)

In a shocking turn of events, a renowned American doctor has admitted to delaying the publication of the study on the mental health effects of puberty blockers in youth with gender dysphoria for nine years, fearing that the findings of this taxpayer-funded study would be “weaponised” and used to justify restrictions on so-called “gender-affirming care” for minors. This fear stemmed from the fact that the study showed puberty blockers treatment did not result in improved mental health of the subjects.

Speaking to the New York Times, Dr Johanna Olson-Kennedy, who runs the largest youth gender clinic in the US, said that she and her colleagues had postponed the publication of findings from a two-year-long study funded by the National Institutes of Health because they were concerned that the findings would be “weaponised” and used by opponents of transgender procedures for minors.

“I do not want our work to be weaponized,” Dr Johanna Olson-Kennedy said.

This $10 million taxpayer-funded study tracked the growth of 95 children from throughout the country to determine if their mental health improved after receiving puberty blockers. Olson-Kennedy claimed that treatment with puberty blockers did not result in mental health benefits, most likely because the children were doing well when the trial started.

However, the unreported data contradict an earlier study published by Olson-Kennedy and colleagues in 2022, which revealed that roughly one-fourth of the children were depressed or suicidal before receiving either puberty blockers or cross-sex hormones. 

“Elevated depression symptoms were endorsed by 28.6% of GnRHa cohort youth, and 22.1% endorsed clinically significant anxiety. About a quarter (23.6%) endorsed lifetime suicidal ideation, with 7.9% reporting a past suicide attempt,” the 2022 Psychosocial Characteristics of Transgender Youth Seeking Gender-Affirming Medical Treatment report reads.

Notably, Olson-Kennedy is the medical director of the Centre for Transyouth Health and Development at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles. As per the data on Stop The Harm, created by the medical advocacy organisation Do No Harm, during 2019 and 2023, the CTYHD prescribed 103 minor patients cross-sex hormone or puberty blocker therapy and performed 165 cross-sex surgical procedures on children. The numbers are outrageous given her own research shows that puberty blockers do not help mental health and yet Olson-Kennedy fears that the critics of puberty blockers will ‘weaponize’ it against them.

Source: Stop The Harm

Olson-Kennedy also confessed that she feared that the study’s findings about the absence of mental health improvements would be used in court to argue that “we shouldn’t use blockers.” She also blamed the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and ‘politics’ for a cut in funding to justify the delay in revealing the research findings, however, the NIH refuted Olson-Kennedy’s claims.

Notably, Puberty blockers or simply hormone blockers, are drugs used to delay the beginning of puberty in children, especially those suffering from gender dysphoria. These blockers temporarily restrict the release of sex hormones, preventing the development of secondary sexual traits such as breasts or facial hair.

While the woke doctor is blatantly defending the deliberate delay in publishing the findings of the research, one of her fellow researchers has said that “the decision flies in the face of research standards and deprives the public of really important science in a field where Americans remain firmly divided,” as NYPost reported.

The reports of Dr Johanna Olson-Kennedy causing a deliberate delay in publishing the research results since it indicated that there were no mental health improvements in the children has triggered outrage.

JK Rowling, the Harry Potter author who is often in headlines for her strong opinions on gender identity politics criticised Olson-Kennedy in a sarcastic post saying, “We must not publish a study that says we’re harming children because people who say we’re harming children will use the study as evidence that we’re harming children, which might make it difficult for us to continue harming children.

USA: Woke doctor delayed publishing of NIH research report for years because it showed puberty blockers did not improve mental health in children