Month: September 2024

In Sweden, the consequences of the policy of opening up to mass migration from Africa and the Middle East cannot be hidden, with the current government taking moderate steps to improve the situation. This is part of an agreement with the Sweden Democrats, a party opposed to destructive migration policies, writes Do Rzeczy.

Over the past 20 years, the number of people born abroad has doubled from 1 million to 2 million, and the country’s population has grown to over 10 million. In 2015, Sweden accepted a record number of so-called asylum applications, 162,000, mainly from culturally foreign countries, such as Afghanistan and Syria. In time, the government decided to reinstate border controls, and is wondering how to “regulate migration.”

The scale of the influx of immigrants to Sweden was limited during the term of office of Malmer Stenergard from the Moderate Party coalition of Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson, who served as migration minister from 2022 to 2024. Since 2024, she has headed the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

In an interview for the newspaper “Dagens Nyheter,” Stenergard admitted that as a result of mass immigration and poor integration in the country, the phenomena of welfare dependency, radicalization, and organized crime have appeared.

The head of Swedish diplomacy did not hide the fact that “there is a difference in terms of which countries immigrants come from.” When large groups of workers from neighboring Finland arrived in the peaceful Scandinavian country in the 1970s, it brought good results. The Finns quickly filled the job market and did not pose a threat to security. “They are similar to us and quickly blend into society, and it is similar now in the case of Ukrainians,” she said, adding that it is completely different “accepting such people versus immigrants from other regions,” the minister said.

Stenergard spoke, without any regard for being politically correct, about those migrant groups causing trouble. She admitted that in the case of immigrants from the Middle East and Africa, “we are dealing with lower education and a completely different cultural background.”

“Many of these countries have a different society and different ways of resolving conflicts,” she said, adding that “migration must be regulated in order to maintain mobility.”

In Sweden – at least so far – they are looking for subtle ways, aside from strict border controls. The government has proposed in the draft budget for next year a relocation subsidy of up to 350,000 kronor (€30,000) for each migrant who agrees to return to their country voluntarily.

Stockholm hopes that this will tempt more foreigners to leave the country, especially those who have not assimilated into Swedish society and who generate all sorts of problems. Unfortunately, polling shows very few would accept.

The political scene is determined to improve security in the country, and authorities in Stockholm do not hide the fact that if voluntary incentives to return prove ineffective, forced deportations are envisaged.

Currently, immigrants who agree to return to their country of origin can count on a grant from Swedish taxpayers of up to 10,000 kronor (around €800) per adult. This amount usually covers travel costs for people with a residence permit in Sweden but who are not citizens of Sweden. Applicants must prove that they have the means to travel and that their return has been accepted by the country of destination.

https://rmx.news/article/swedish-foreign-minister-says-country-must-speak-openly-of-the-downsides-of-mass-immigration/

Since the appointment of the new French government headed by former European Commissioner Michel Barnier, the press has been insisting on a possible ‘right turn,’ or at the very least a rightward ‘tilt’ of Emmanuel Macron’s administration. What is the reality?

The presence of a few right-wing figures on the team should give us no illusions.
The government is severely constrained, and any initiative that is judged to be outside the canons of centrist political correctness will be immediately pilloried.

Pressure from the Left on the new team began even before the government was formed. The Les Républicains (LR) party, from which Michel Barnier historically hails, may well be crowing about its unexpected return to favour—it scored less than 5% in the last presidential elections, came 4th in the legislative elections, but nonetheless provided a dozen ministers—but it is under observation. 

Laurence Garnier, a member of the LR party and the new Secretary of State for Consumer Affairs, has had to bear the brunt of this hidden censure. She was anticipated to take up the post of Minister for the Family, but in the end had to make do with a much more modest portfolio. Emmanuel Macron even made it known that he did not want her in the government. This was due to her vote against enshrining abortion in the constitution a few weeks ago, as well as her stance against gay marriage, medically assisted procreation (PMA) for women, and the ban on conversion therapies.

The left-wing newspaper Libération has launched a true witch hunt. On its front page, the paper denounced “the reactionary pact” and went looking into the past of members of the government to award them diplômes d’infréquentabilité—‘certifications of non-reliability.’ Patrick Hetzel, Minister for Higher Education, and Othman Nasrou—though loyal to the very centrist Valérie Pécresse—have been condemned for having, one or more times in their careers, expressed conservative views in favour of the family or a reasoned vision of bioethics.

But what is more serious is the pressure that the Left intends to exert from outside, now that the team is in place, to ensure the government’s ideological rectitude. Left-wing commentators on X are entertaining the fantasy of a resurgence of reactionary policies and worrying that societal ‘rights’—abortion, gay marriage, LGBT rights—might be called into question even though there has never been any question of this and, from our humble point of view, we can even deplore the timidity of the new ministers on these crucial issues. Planned Parenthood says it is “worried.” Former Prime Minister Gabriel Attal sent a very clear message to Michel Barnier: he took the liberty of asking for guarantees that there would be “no backtracking on PMA, abortion, or minority rights.” He said he was “personally offended” by the past positions of certain ministers. He declared: 

I will ask the Prime Minister to state clearly in his general policy statement that there will be no going back on PMA, the right to abortion, LGBT rights

as if he intended to control a government over which, although a former prime minister himself, he is supposed to have no control.

Societal issues usually provide an opportunity for highly inflammatory ideological conflicts. But security policy is no exception. The terrible case of the death of young Philippine gave Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau, also a member of LR, the opportunity to make some firm statements about the need to control French migration policy. Socialist Justice Minister Didier Migaud, who was lying in wait, was quick to defuse these announcements by explaining that there was no problem with laxity in the judiciary in France. The tone has been set: if Retailleau wants to pursue a firm policy in the coming weeks—we dare speak in months, given the precarious balance of this government—he will find in the person of his collaborator an adversary determined to change nothing. The issues of OQTF (obligation to leave French territory) and the enforcement of sentencing are shared between three ministries: the Interior, Justice, and also Foreign Affairs, since this ministry is responsible for negotiating consular passes for foreign nationals slated for deportation. The Interior Minister must realise that he can expect nothing from either of his supposed collaborators.

Despite appearances, and despite the boasts once made by supporters of the LR party, such as the newspaper Le Figaro, which ran the headline “The Right is back,” deep-seated hostility to the Right, its programme, and its values, remains the rule at the top of the French state. The latest evidence of this can be found in the statements by Antoine Armand, the Minister for the Economy, who explained on Tuesday September 24th that “the RN is not part of the Republican arc” and that he therefore had no intention of discussing matters with its representatives—unlike the far-left party La France Insoumise, which would be part of it. These comments caused a small earthquake, as if Armand seemed to forget that the government team to which he belongs can only maintain itself with the goodwill of the RN. The prime minister had to firmly remind his colleague of the rules and call Marine Le Pen on the phone to try to put out the fire.

This is the flip side of the ‘right-wing government’ that some observers of French political life have been a little too quick to sell in the press. In truth, the situation is explosive, and the Left, allied with the centre, has no intention whatsoever of leaving the slightest room for manoeuvre to the Right—which, however, holds the keys to keeping them in power. The horizon for the Barnier government is certainly bleak, and its life expectancy limited.

https://europeanconservative.com/articles/commentary/french-government-may-signal-right-but-establishment-still-steers-left/

A trans-identified male in Chester, UK, has pleaded guilty to breaching a sexual harm prevention order by contacting a child believed to be just 9-years-old for the purposes of sexual abuse.

Chloee-Mae Danvers, 25, appeared at Chester Crown Court on August 13, and pleaded guilty to breaching a Sexual Harm Prevention Order after attempting to contact a child under the age of 18. According to court records, Danvers specifically engaged in explicitly sexual communication with a 9-year-old. He further failed to comply with the order by using aliases on websites without registering the usernames with the police, and for deleting internet browsing history.

Danvers’ crime came as he was already facing sentencing for a separate child sexual offense – namely, possessing a Category A indecent image of a child, along with making two Category B images. According to the Crown Prosecution Service, Category A child pornography is defined as depicting “penetrative sexual activity, sexual activity with an animal or sadism.”

Danvers’ sentencing, which Recorder Eric Lamb said would inevitably be “substantial,” was set to take place on September 25, but Reduxx has learned has been pushed back until October 11.

Prior to his convictions, Danvers, a male who identifies as a woman, was active in his local LGBT community, and had publicly identified himself as being a player with the “Trans & Enby Football Club in Liverpool.” On a GoFundMe page, the club describes itself as “centering trans and non-binary folks” along with the wider LGBT+ community.

“Too often, queer folks are sidelined in mainstream sports, but in our club, trans people are the majority,” the club notes in the fundraiser’s description. “Your contribution will help us grow our club, enabling us to reach more trans people in Liverpool, and build on our proud community club,” they add, claiming that the money will be spent on training sessions and kit. Their Instagram page has been locked down, and it is unclear whether the club is aware of Danvers’ conviction.

In 2022, Danvers attempted to raise just under £1,400 on GoFundMe for a private gender transition. “Hi, my name is Chloee, and I have gender dysphoria. I was born male, but I desire to be a woman. My only option is to go private with the Harley Street Gender Clinic in Marylebone,” Danvers wrote on the since-deleted page.

“My goal is to transition into a woman entirely, and these funds would go towards me getting to London and paying for the consultations.”

On his X profile, Danvers frequently discussed his love for science fiction, notably Star Trek. In 2005, detectives from the Child Exploitation Section of the Toronto Sex Crimes Unit claimed that of the over 100 offenders they had arrested in the previous four years, “all but one” was a “hard-core Trekkie.”

Still representing Starfleet as Captain Christine Pike of the Multiversal Explorer U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701-M (Robert April Class) 34c. pic.twitter.com/IZwWF6wsCN

— Chloee-Mae Danvers (@chloeemaetwitch) April 30, 2024

Danvers also regularly wrote crossover fiction between Marvel and DC superheroes, Star Trek, and Doctor Who. As a streamer on Twitch, he called himself “femboybombshell,” which remains his username on Instagram. The term “femboy” has become more popular with younger adults and teenagers, with a 2022 study showing the most popular male followers on TikTok had adopted more feminine attributes. As a Twitch streamer, Danvers included false eyelashes on his Amazon wish list for viewers to buy him.

https://reduxx.info/uk-transgender-pedophile-pleads-guilty-after-contacting-9-year-old-for-sexual-abuse/

The interior minister of Germany’s state of Thuringia has called for banning the Alternative for Germany (AfD), after a tumultuous opening session of the state parliament.

“Events in the Thuringian state parliament have shown that the AfD is aggressively combating parliamentarians,” Georg Maier, the acting interior minister, wrote on X.

The September 26 opening session was riddled with conflict, interrupted on several occasions, and ended prematurely, amid clashes between the AfD and other parties.

“The potential for a party ban and actions for violating Article 1 of the Constitution have long been undisputed in the case of the AfD,” the minister added.

“I already expressed my thoughts on this in December 2023. Today shows that I was not entirely wrong,” said Maier, who is a Social Democratic Party (SDP) member.

Die heutigen Ereignisse im Thüringer Landtag haben gezeigt, dass die #AfD aggressiv kämpferisch gegen den Parlamentarismus vorgeht. Ich denke, dass damit die Voraussetzungen für ein Verbotsverfahren gegeben sind. 1/3

— Georg_Maier (@GeorgMaier8) September 26, 2024

The AfD’s behaviour during the session was “an attack on parliamentary rights, on the constitution and on every single member of parliament,” agreed Thuringia’s Christian Democratic Union (CDU) parliamentary group leader Mario Voigt.

The AfD’s Jürgen Treutler, who at 73 years old was Thuringia’s oldest lawmaker, was serving as the acting chair, tasked with selecting the body’s president and vice-president and assigning members to committees.

Treutler used his speech to say the chamber’s president should be from his own party, as the largest parliamentary group.

In Thuringia, along with other German states, it is customary for the state parliament’s largest political group to receive key leadership roles, including the parliament presidency.

Other parties, however, objected to the possibility of an AfD president, and demanded a rule change to prevent such a nomination.

Fifteen minutes into the session, the parliament’s Christian Democrats began a discussion on the presence of a quorum, normally a formality.

This prompted a first clash between group leaders and Treutler, who wanted to complete his speech first.

The CDU’s members soon after interrupted again, accusing Treutler of not adhering to the rules.

The session quickly then became a shouting match, as frustrated members clashed with other parties, with a series of ensuing suspensions of the session.

As the parties debated their interpretations of the rules of procedure, the CDU, Bündnis Sahra Wagenknecht (BSW), SPD, and Die Linke parties accused the AfD of abusing its position in order to “seize power”.

Those parties, which together formed a majority, pushed for a vote on amending the rules of procedure—which Treutler used his role as chair to block.

With no agreement reached, the meeting was adjourned until September 28, while the Constitutional Court determined the legality of the decisions Treutler had already made.

Florian Post, a former Social Democratic Party member who subsequently joined the Christian Democrats, called his current party’s tactics “a serious mistake”.

“Rules of procedure are changed after the state parliament is constituted, and this is completed with the election of the president of the state parliament and not before,” said Post.

The rules of procedure could have been changed in one of the final sessions before the state election, as the Bundestag had done before the 2017 election, he added.

Instead, the CDU’s antics in the Thuringian Parliament were “completely stupid and idiotic”, and benefited the AfD, he said.

“By the way: you don’t have to like it, but the AfD won this election! If you want to change that in the next election, you should be smarter and at least take note of the election result,” Post concluded.

“The AfD showed its true face. It is not a party like any other. Its members of parliament are intent on undermining the democratic system,” Die Welt wrote.

The episode showed “how aggressively combative the AfD is”, according to weekly magazine Der Spiegel.

“The right-wing extremist AfD … pulled out all the stops on Thursday to play off its new power—and to attack parliamentary democracy,” Der Spiegel added.

Thuringia’s Interior Minister wants to ban AfD after parliamentary chaos (brusselssignal.eu)

Labour’s early release scheme, launched to reduce overcrowding in British prisons, has now in error freed more than 30 prisoners who were never eligible for inclusion in the programme. Further denting the reputation of an already catastrophic government initiative, the latest revelation came on Thursday, September 26th.

Tucked away among the 1,750 prisoners who became eligible for release after serving just 40% of their sentences (down from the original 50% minimum) were approximately three dozen offenders who are not eligible for the new programme at all.

Speaking to the Daily Mirror newspaper, the Ministry of Justice said:

The convictions remain valid with offenders monitored since their release and they will soon be back behind bars …. Public safety is our first priority.

Most of the 37 people incorrectly released, who had been jailed for the offence of breaching restraining orders, are now back inside, while five remain at large. The stalking-adjacent convictions of these temporarily freed men would likely add to the insecurity felt by their victims, who do not wish to see the return of their tormentors to UK streets.

Since its election in July, Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour government claimed to have inherited a “prisons crisis” from the previous Conservative administration. The idea of an early release scheme—only excluding prisoners sentenced for four years or more for “serious violent offences”—was to free up space in the male carceral estate. Following riots after the deaths of three young girls in a knife attack on a Southport dance class, Starmer also claimed to be preparing for the public disorder convictions which would promptly increase the prison population.

While some friends and families of criminals celebrated by laying on champagne breakfasts for their peers on release, the scheme has been met with an incredulous response elsewhere. This month’s first tranche of 1,700+ prisoners to be released across England and Wales will be joined by more in October. A proportion of the September cohort are already back behind bars, having either breached the terms of their release or in some cases seriously reoffended with new crimes. Others have failed to connect with the probation service or not been fitted with an electronic tagging device, due a lack of available equipment.

The early release scheme goes against the idea of justice by making prison capacity, rather than time served or rehabilitation completed, the criteria for ending individual sentences. It further adds to the sense that, from shoplifting to knife crime, law and order in Britain has seriously broken down.

https://europeanconservative.com/articles/news/uk-labours-early-release-scheme-frees-30-prisoners-by-mistake

By Jack Hellner

A new study reveals that the earth’s temperatures are trending cooler, but we all know that won’t make any difference on the progressive talking points and radical policies from the left.

First, the story:

MSM Journos Inadvertently Reveal Shocking Truth About Global Warming 

WaPo journalists cited a new study about Earth’s global surface temperatures over the last 485 million years. In 2023, Earth’s average temperature reached 58.96 F (14.98 C), well below the average 96.8 degrees F (36 degrees Celsius) the study showed around 100 million years ago. The trend shows Earth’s temperatures have been sliding for 50 million years.

Scientists, journalists, billionaires, politicians, educators, bureaucrats, and other green pushers know that the earth has gone through many significant warming and cooling cycles in its billions of years existence.

They know that these natural cycles had nothing to do with humans and our use of natural resources. 

They know that there are many natural variables that affect the climate continuously.

Yet, when we get a little warming after a more than 400-year cooling cycle that ended around 1860, we get continuous pronouncements that this minor warming of a possible one to two degrees is absolutely caused by humans and our use of oil, coal, and natural gas. They repeatedly falsely claim the science is settled. They don’t care that there was a 35-year cooling cycle from 1940–1975 when our use of these natural resources was rising exponentially. They act like that is irrelevant. 

We get constant claims that we are having the warmest day, month, or year to indoctrinate the public even though that is demonstrably not true.

Now, we get a story from one of the most extreme green pushers of all, the WaPo, admitting that temperatures were much higher in the past—yet we know the goal of the green pushers is to get rid of our use of natural resources, so we know the talking points won’t change because facts have never mattered.

For around 50 years, the UN has been spreading the lie that we have only a few years left to change the climate. They have endless gabfests with billionaires, who fly to the gabfests in private jets, to pretend they care about their carbon footprint. They buy worthless pieces of paper called carbon credits to pretend that they reduce their carbon footprint. 

Why haven’t these gabfests and the worthless Paris climate accords changed the climate so far? Because they can’t. The climate is and has always changed naturally.

This article from Reuters gives away the game:

US election uncertainty clouds UN climate finance progress

• Countries hesitant to commit before knowing US election outcome
• New climate finance target needed to replace expiring $100 billion pledge
• Urgency in climate fight as global temperatures rise
• UN General Assembly starts Tuesday in New York

Sept 21 (Reuters) – Countries have a chance to use this week’s U.N. meetings in New York to resolve big differences over boosting the world’s annual goal for climate finance, but uncertainty over the U.S. election could jeopardize progress ahead of the next U.N. climate summit in November.

They are worried about our election, not because of the climate, but because they think they might not get the money. It has always been about money.

The goal of Kamala Harris and other Democrats is to destroy oil companies and the tens of millions of jobs they directly and indirectly employ, an obvious fact to those in the industry:

Harris Worries Oil and Gas Industry Leaders: America Can’t Afford Her Agenda

There’s a lot America can’t afford with a possible Harris/Walz presidency. Every one of the few coherent policy statements either candidate has mentioned would drive spending and inflation higher. What few coherent statements they have made on energy will make us more dependent on foreign energy and will make that energy more expensive; Kamala Harris is, of course, dissembling when she claims she doesn’t oppose, for instance, fracking, as there is ample evidence from her past statements that prove otherwise. She also supports the Green New Deal, a supposed climate-change measure that would be disastrous to our nation’s economy and our standard of living.

Kamala Harris is a leopard that isn’t changing her spots. Not that much. And not to our benefit. What’s more, American oil and gas company leaders know this and are speaking out on the matter.

Harris seems to still believe our use of oil is an existential threat to our survival, so she is just pretending that she is now a supporter of fracking to get votes.

Harris and other green pushers should be asked with what they would replace the over 6,000 products derived from crude oil? Harris’s answer would probably start with “I was brought up in a middle-class family.”

Democrats pretend they are progressive but there is nothing forward-looking about destroying our quality of life.

If the green pushers really cared about helping the poor and underdeveloped countries, they would encourage them to develop instead of just handing them money and keeping them poor and dying young.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/09/science_says_the_earth_s_temperatures_are_trending_cooler_but_the_talking_points_and_radical_policies_won_t_change.html

Tensions are rising in Vienna’s 10th district, Favoriten, as local residents express anger over a project to house refugees in 110 newly built, luxury apartments.

The apartments, equipped with air conditioning, balconies, and modern kitchens, have stirred controversy as local citizens and political figures question the decision to allocate such accommodations to refugees while many Viennese struggle with substandard housing.

The joint initiative between the city government and the Protestant charitable organization Diakonie is designed to house recognized refugees and their families and prepare them for the labor market. However, the decision to offer such modern accommodations to asylum seekers has triggered outrage, particularly after revelations of the case of a Syrian family receiving €4,600 in social assistance in Vienna. Many feel that the city’s resources are being unfairly allocated to non-citizens.

Around 30 local residents staged a spontaneous protest on Wednesday morning in front of the apartment building, holding signs with slogans like, “Rental madness for Viennese, luxury building for asylum seekers!”

Alongside the protest, a signature campaign has gathered around 200 supporters.

One protester said, “Why should people who haven’t contributed to this country get luxury apartments while many of us are stuck in old, moldy housing?”

The district of Favoriten, already a hotspot for migrant communities, has seen heightened concerns about the integration of new residents. Some locals fear that the project could further strain the area’s resources and social cohesion.

The poll-topping Freedom Party’s (FPÖ) local branch in the Austrian capital strongly criticized the decision, with leader Dominik Nepp accusing the socialist mayor Michael Ludwig of prioritizing refugees over local Austrians.

“While countless Viennese have to live in moldy municipal apartments and don’t even get new windows, asylum seekers who have never worked a day here are given brand new luxury apartments with air conditioning,” Nepp said.

“There’s no money for renovations of dilapidated municipal buildings, but there are luxury apartments with attics and private gardens for refugees,” he added.

The minority FPÖ cohort on the city council has moved for a motion of no confidence against Ludwig, which is not expected to pass given the political arithmetic.

The incident has sparked a wider debate about housing inequality in Vienna. Many residents point out that minimum pensioners and low-income families often live in substandard municipal apartments, waiting years for improvements like new windows or mold remediation.

However, this isn’t a situation unique to Austria. Governments in multiple European nations are being accused by citizens of prioritizing newcomers over the locals.

Last year, a 128-apartment complex on Askanierring in the Spandau borough of Berlin was announced by the Wohnungsbaugesellschaft Berlin-Mitte (WBM) housing association to be reserved exclusively for asylum seekers.

In addition, Remix News has covered extensively the multitude of stories, particularly in Germany, of affordable housing tenants and the elderly being evicted from their accommodation to make way for asylum seekers.

Tenants in the town of Lörrach in southern Germany were informed last year that their apartment contracts were set to be terminated to make way for Ukrainian refugees, while in Berlin many nursing home residents suffered the same fate.

https://rmx.news/article/outrage-in-vienna-as-luxury-apartments-for-refugees-spark-protests/

On today’s #NCFDeprogrammed, Charlie Downes of the Centre for Migration Control joins hosts Harrison Pitt of the European Conservative magazine and Connor Tomlinson of Lotus Eaters to discuss the recent Reform UK convention.

According to a new survey, more and more Austrians are calling for the state to take more intensive action against the spread of Islamism in this country. The free newspaper ‘Heute’ wanted to know from its readers whether they were in favour of a law banning Islamism, similar to the one that exists for National Socialist reactivation. And the vote is clear: 67 per cent of Austrians are clearly in favour.

What is also particularly interesting is the approval according to the voting preferences of the respondents: Freedom Party (83 per cent), Greens (74 per cent), Beer Party (73 per cent), Austrian People’s Party (70 per cent) and New Democrats (64 per cent). The voters of the Social Democratic Party (SPÖ) came last with 56 per cent, which nevertheless means that one in two of them is in favour of a ban on Islamism in Austria. ‘There seems to be a relatively high level of approval here, which reflects the concern about increasing Islamism and the desire for political countermeasures,’ says political scientist and Islamism expert Nina Scholz, summarising the results of the survey on the short messaging service X (formerly Twitter).

Laut Umfrage der Zeitung "HEUTE" befürworten in Österreich 67% ein Verbotsgesetz gegen #Islamismus nach Vorbild des existierenden NS-Verbotsgesetzes. Zustimmung nach Wahlpräferenzen der Befragten: FPÖ (83%), Grüne (74%), Bierpartei (73%), ÖVP (70%), Neos (64%), Schlusslicht ist… pic.twitter.com/jNWhKMMO6J

— Nina Scholz (@NinaaScholz) September 26, 2024

Umfrage: Mehrheit fordert ein Islamismus-Verbot in Österreich | Exxpress

CONTENT NOTICE: This article contains graphic references to the forced prostitution and sexual abuse of children, as detailed by public prosecutors in the context of an ongoing criminal trial. Reader discretion is appreciated.

A trans-identified male is standing trial along with a millionaire from Munich for the horrific sexual abuse of prepubescent girls. The case has sent shockwaves throughout Germany due to the depravity and well-organized nature of the pedophilic acts.

Due to strict privacy laws in Germany, the press has anonymized the identities of both of the men involved, but Reduxx can exclusively reveal that the 81-year-old millionaire at the center of the case is Helmut Reiner Dorsch, who lived in an expansive villa in Pullach, Munich. His transgender compatriot, known only as Arbend, would procure young girls for Dorsch to abuse, delivering them to the man’s Pullach villa.

Dorsch reportedly demanded girls who were as “small and slim as possible,” and had a preference for those under 8 years of age.

According to the public prosecutor’s office, Dorsch is said to have first sought out vulnerable mothers on the internet between 2005 and 2017 in order to coerce them into prostitution and making their daughters available for sexual abuse in exchange for thousands of euros.

According to the Rheinische Post, in at least two cases a woman handed her children over to him and was even present during the rape. A 12-year-old girl was forced to call him “daddy” while he sexually abused her.

Between 2021 and 2022, Dorsch met Arbend, a male who identifies as a “woman.” The men had a sexual relationship, and Arbend agreed to help Dorsch procure children for him to rape.

On one occasion, Arbend contacted a friend who had a 5-year-old daughter and invited her to Munich for a spa-day, offering to take care of her child while she indulged in some wellness treatments he had arranged. While her mother was at the spa, Arbend gave the girl to Dorsch. The elderly millionaire raped the child and paid Arbend €1,800 for his role in facilitating the abuse. On another occasion, Arbend is said to have arranged for Dorsch to rape his 7-year-old cousin.

But Arbend later sought more money from Dorsch, and filmed him sexually abusing children for the purposes of using the video as leverage in financial negotiations. Threatening to publish the recording, he was able to secure an additional €200,000 from Dorsch.

According to the Munich public prosecutor’s office, Dorsch and Arbend are said to have also made plans for a “child abuse program” using drastic language about how they could rape several children at the same time. This plan is not believed to have been implemented at this time.

According to BILD, Dorsch also ordered a prostitute to his home via the online platform “mysugardaddy,” who he instructed to act as his own 8-year-old daughter while wearing childish clothing. During the role play, Dorsch showed her child pornography and played the recordings of his own acts of sexually abusing children. He also attempted to coerce her into prostitution and offered her money to procure him children that he could abuse. She refused.

Arbend and Dorsch were taken into custody in June of 2023 after authorities began investigating Arbend’s online activity. A raid of Dorsch’s villa uncovered hundreds of recordings of child abuse, including images of infants. Both men have been in custody since.

However, Dorsch’s defense attorneys have filed a motion accusing the judges presiding over the trial of being biased because they are contributing to a book about sexual criminal law. The verdict is not expected until January 2025 at the earliest.

During a recent hearing, Arbend did not comment on the allegations against him, and only complained that he would suffer from being housed in a men’s correctional facility because of his transgender identity.

Germany is soon set to implement a far-reaching self-identification act, which will enable individuals to more easily change their legal name and sex. After the law comes into effect in November, Arbend will be allowed to change his name and sex with no medical or psychiatric documentation, even while behind bars.

However, the transfer of male inmates to women’s prisons in Germany has already begun ahead of the official implementation of the law.

As previously reported by Reduxx, at least 15 male inmates have been transferred to the Berlin women’s prison so far. The government has refused to release information on these men’s criminal convictions, citing concerns about “stigma” against transgender people. But despite a lack of official data, a number of the inmates transferred are known to be sex offenders.

GERMANY: Transgender convicts are being sent to women's prisons ahead of a new self-identification law coming into force in November.

Some of the inmates are known sex offenders, but the government is refusing to release official data to prevent "stigma."https://t.co/5UK9xFg0eh

— REDUXX (@ReduxxMag) August 28, 2024

Renowned criminal lawyer Udo Vetter has argued that the penal system must respect the changed legal sex of convicted criminals, stating: “The principle of equal treatment for prisoners applies.”

This is despite Vetter admitting that he anticipates that “many inmates” will take advantage of the law.

https://reduxx.info/exclusive-details-shocking-trial-in-germany-reveals-that-a-trans-identified-male-procured-children-for-a-millionaire-pedophile-to-abuse/