Month: September 2024

Mr M. is brought before the judges of the court in Créteil for sexually harassing a woman in Choisy Park and beating her husband. Although he has no criminal record, he is brought before the court immediately due to his illegal residence in France and faces a severe sentence: the public prosecutor demands ten months’ imprisonment with an arrest warrant.

More specifically, 32-year-old Mr M. is accused of sexually assaulting a woman in Choisy Park, then beating her husband, relapsing and consuming cannabis.

The presiding judge refers to the statements made by Mrs G., who describes the following scene: After spending some time with relatives in the Parc de Choisy, she decided to go home and started walking to leave the park. After a few steps, she felt followed and turned around when Mr M. touched her genitals with his hand, focusing on her buttocks without penetrating her. She assures him that she hit him on the shoulder, to which he replied: ‘I want you, you’. Mrs G. immediately called her husband, who had remained in the park, who rushed over and is said to have been hit by Mr M.: ‘He kept coming at my husband, who hit him back with his fists.’ The couple call the police, who arrest Mr M…

For the last hearing of the day, the benches of the 12th Criminal Chamber of the Court of Créteil have emptied: only the judges, the lawyers for the defence and the joint plaintiffs, the defendant, his interpreter and a journalist are still present.

Unless my memory fails me, we saw each other on May 14th of this year and you promised me that we would never see each other again…’, the judge starts.

Finally, the defence lawyer has the floor. He stands up and says: ‘There is still a lot to be done in educating men, especially if they come from Pakistan. This one is the result of a patriarchal system, this culture where forced marriage is still practised.’ The lawyer develops his line of defence for several minutes, focusing on the cultural gap between the laws of the country where Mr M. is on trial and the customs of his country of origin.

In order to create empathy for his client, he also mentions his ‘frustrated sex life’ using very specific elements: he was 25 years old when he had his first sexual relationship – with a prostitute – and his last sexual intercourse was several months ago. The lawyer assures that his client has now understood the lesson well, which he summarises clumsily: ‘You have to approach the woman first before you touch her. The lawyer demands a lenient sentence with simple probation, for which his client is eligible, and an acquittal in relation to the violence against Mr G. To help Mr M. ‘better control his sexual impulses’ and treat his alcohol addiction, he also demands a commitment to medical treatment.

(…)

After a break for deliberation, the court found Mr M. guilty on all three counts (sexual assault, violence, cannabis use) and sentenced him to eight months’ imprisonment with an arrest warrant and a ten-year ban on residing in France. He must pay 2,000 and 200 euros to Mrs G. and Mr G. respectively.

But I’m not in a position to pay,’ says the defendant and seems to sincerely regret it.

There is an organisation, Sarvi, that will pay for you, and if you stay in France, you have to pay back.
And after eight months in prison, I’ll be deported?
That’s another organisation that takes care of that.

TJ de Créteil : « Il reste beaucoup de chemin à parcourir dans l’éducation des hommes, surtout quand ils viennent du Pakistan » – Actu-Juridique

A site in a German town earmarked for a children’s daycare center has been repurposed as a container village for migrants, leading to protests from locals enraged by the decision.

Around 150 residents of Kirchheim, Upper Bavaria, took to the streets at the weekend against the asylum accommodation that will comprise 32 two-story containers housing 192 asylum seekers.

The accommodation should be available for occupancy from mid-October.

Local authorities were taken aback by the response of residents when they were invited to conduct an on-site visit of the accommodation, planted in the heart of a new residential estate. The buildings will actually border the gardens of terraced houses.

“A daycare center was once planned here – now we have a refugee village,” resident Helga Bauer told Münchner Merkur.

“No one wants to have a facility like this in front of their house. We’re all afraid of the stabbers,” added Reinhard Bauer, another concerned local.

The daycare center initially planned for the site has been delayed indefinitely, with locals fully expecting the proposal to be scrapped in exchange for semi-permanent asylum accommodation.

Local politicians like District Administrator Christoph Göbel have promised that the buildings will only be occupied by Ukrainian refugee families until the end of 2026, but there is no guarantee on who will be the new neighbors after that date.

“We have a lot of refugees in Germany and in the Munich district. That’s a fact,” Göbel told the crowd. “It costs a huge amount of money, I don’t enjoy it, but I have to do it.

“We already said that we were reaching our limits. There are now 8,000 refugees and will have to make room for 2,000 more in 2025. We now have 266 properties in the district and urgently need more and new ones,” he added.

But the locals aren’t convinced that Ukrainians will be the sole occupants.

“I know for a fact that Syrians and Afghans will come,” said one attendee at the protest.

“Busloads of Syrians and Afghans are guaranteed to arrive,” shouted another. “There are a bunch of young men who are bored and don’t know what to do all day,” they added.

The move is the latest in a long list of German towns being inundated with new arrivals without their consent.

Just last week, protesters gathered at the district council building in Seeon, where they expressed their fury over plans to import 500 migrants, which would then make up more than 10 percent of the town’s population of 4,000.

Remix News has covered this issue extensively as local authorities continue to find inadequate solutions to the federal government’s open borders agenda.

https://rmx.news/article/were-all-afraid-of-the-stabbers-refugee-container-village-built-on-daycare-center-site-in-german-town/

Muslim asylum seeker obtained German passport and mocks Germans: “You are helpless, I conquered your land. Now I belong to system, everything belongs to me, everything is under my feet!”

Muslim asylum seeker obtained German passport and mocks Germans: "You are helpless, I conquered your land. Now I belong to system, everything belongs to me, everything is under my feet!" pic.twitter.com/LUsbWt8vIX

— RadioGenoa (@RadioGenoa) September 15, 2024

Word is out that Germany’s industrial base is tanking

The Federation of German Industries (BDI) wanted to know more and therefore commissioned a study from the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) and the German Economic Institute (IW).

It is now available – and the outlook is dire. It is no longer a question of “belief and opinion, but of data and facts,” said BDI boss Siegfried Russwurm at the presentation.

He also got straight to the point: “Germany has fallen behind almost everywhere. […] The years of driving the country into disrepair are now taking their toll.” Structural problems have accumulated: high energy costs, high labor costs, high corporate taxes, bureaucracy, a shortage of skilled workers – not to mention the acute geopolitical problems facing the export nation Germany. Germany has a “fundamental location problem,” concluded the association’s head.

The study he presented paints a bleak picture of the future: by 2030, around a fifth of industrial value creation in Germany will be threatened. The BDI boss specifically mentioned digitization and artificial intelligence (AI).

Additional investments of more than 1,4 trillion euros will be required to make Germany competitive again. The entire “industrial policy agenda” must be realigned – but so far nothing has really been done to address this.

The BDI president’s pessimism was shared by Michael Hüther, director of the IW, who also drew attention to various structural deficits. One of Germany’s previous strengths, the strong interlinking of the individual industrial sectors, could suddenly turn out to be an Achilles heel if one link in the chain is weakened.

It remains to be seen whether the “traffic light” coalition will heed the experts’ warnings. Sadly, given the “achievements” of German industrial and economic policy over the last two and a half years, such optimism is misplaced.

Federation of German Industries: A fifth of industrial value creation under threat – Free West Media

By Andrea Widburg

There’s a report of rampaging seagulls in Scotland. It resonates with me, so I’m sharing it with you. It’s a reminder that part of climate change madness stems from the fact that city dwellers (the ones who most fanatically embrace all leftist shibboleths) are completely removed from anything but curated nature or they truly hate humans.

So, here’s the story from the Daily Mail:

Seagulls are menacing coastal communities and major cities alike, sparking hundreds of complaints to councils the length and breadth of Scotland.

As the birds travel to new areas – increasingly inland – in search of food, we can reveal that nearly 700 complaints have been raised this year already, with the number surpassing last year’s total of around 600.

They include horrifying accounts of children left bloodied by the birds swooping on people and household pets and, while coastal communities are severely affected, complaints also include scores of revolting tales of the gulls feasting on rats in Scotland’s biggest city.

The birds, which are coming further inland to feed than ever before due to reducing fish numbers, are protected under law in Scotland, although special applications can be made to remove them if they pose a serious risk. (Emphasis mine.)

The story plays into my biases because I despise seagulls. I grew up in San Francisco, and my junior high school was two miles from the Pacific Ocean, as the seagull flies. Many kids littered the schoolyard at lunchtime, so the seagulls would brutally harass us for an hour, seizing our food and pecking at and pooping on us. Bats have been described as “rats with wings,” but so are seagulls.

I’m not stupid. I recognize that seagulls are incredibly graceful flyers and have an important role in the natural ecosystem. But I still dislike them intensely, and I feel for their Scottish victims.

The story’s also important because it highlights a few things about leftists.

For all of their climate madness, leftists reject the core survival idea that we must be stewards of nature. Overfishing the oceans will leave us without food. The aggressive seagulls, as they fly further inland, are harbingers of that problem.

Being a steward of nature doesn’t mean being a crazy climate changista. Indeed, it’s the opposite because it sees nature serving man and not vice versa.

Speaking of overfishing the oceans, it’s important to note that the worst practitioners of this are almost certainly Tim Walz’s beloved Chinese. If you’re familiar with the “Tragedy of the Commons,” it is they who are so greedy in the first instance that, soon, nothing will be left for anyone.

Resource depletion is a serious problem and needs to be addressed without the garbage of climate change floating around to impede the real issue.

The seagulls’ aggressiveness should also remind us that nature is red of tooth, claw, and beak. Yes, we can despoil one area (or species) or another, but nature will always reach out to compensate.

I first had this thought during a long-ago visit to Cartagena, Columbia. I found it a grim place because the people lacked the energy and resources to push back against the encroaching jungle. This taught me that containing nature to create habitable communities that favor people requires energy and money, something America once used to have.

I still have that thought daily now that I live in the Southeastern part of the U.S., a place with abundant rain and sunshine. The effort to keep water, plants, and animals from destroying my home never stops and is quite expensive.

Don’t get me started on my travails with squirrels, which are rats with fuzzy tails. I also keep a wary eye out for the ubiquitous alligators in my community. We don’t get the huge ones here, but they’re big enough to do damage to those who aren’t careful with themselves, their children, or their pets. Here, nature is part of the region’s charm, but it’s not friendly.

For those who live in America’s or Europe’s cities, nature is so distant that they have no idea just how unfriendly it is. As leftist cities decay, they’re becoming aware of the scourge of rats, and cockroaches are just a fact of life, but urban leftists have created gauzy, Disney-esque fantasies about the larger predators—e.g., coyotes, bears, lions, boars, wolves, etc. In communities that have started protecting these animals or stop pushing back against them, people are no longer safe:

• Coyote attacks toddler in Woodland Hills in broad daylight: attack captured on video (I know the neighborhood where this happened, and the coyotes are omnipresent and scary).
• Wild Boars Are Causing Havoc In Germany, But Humans Are Making It Worse (I love this COVID-era headline about it being people’s fault)
• Japan wants to make it easier to shoot bears as attacks rise
• Mountain lion attacks, kills pit bull in Sylmar neighborhood

We are having to relearn the same lessons our ancestors always knew: Wild animals and people cannot share the same spaces. It’s a zero-sum game.

When it comes to urban-dwelling leftists, they either don’t understand that it’s a zero-sum game, so they believe in some Arcadian fantasy of co-existence, or they’ve been so brainwashed with hatred against humankind that they want the advantage to go to the animals, with the humans sent to the abattoir. Just look at Kamala Harris’s climate director. She’s explained that she thinks it’s probably unethical to have children because of the climate. She’s not alone.

That seagull story touches on all of it. Instead of focusing on increasing our resources, leftists focus on the chimera of “climate change,” which allows them to redistribute wealth. Meanwhile, people who are naïve (or worse) insist that bears, boars, seagulls, and other beasties should have preference over humans, all in service of a fantasy about coexistence or because they really hate people (except for themselves, of course).

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/09/hitchcock_s_the_birds_playing_out_for_real_in_scotland.html

Two assassination attempts on Trump in three months.

This would be considered significant if we didn’t have a media and political establishment actively cheering for the assassins.

Unlike Crooks, there’s no debate about what Ryan Wesley Routh intended. He not only had an AK-47 mounted with a scope at Trump’s country club and had gotten within a few hundred yards of him, but had an extensive online social media history of ranting about Trump and expressing support for Democrats.

In one of his last tweets, Routh tweeted to Biden that Trump was out to “MASA… make Americans Slaves again master. Democracy is on the ballot and we cannot afford to lose. We cannot afford to fail.”

The wording echoed that of the Biden-Harris campaign at the time.

Routh had donated exclusively to Democrats, including Elizabeth Warren, Tom Steyer, and Tulsi Gabbard, and he had been a supporter of Bernie Sanders.

His social media history, now conveniently erased, makes him look like a nutjob, but nutjobs are the likeliest to carry out political assassinations. It’s the sane people ‘egging them on’ by claiming that Trump is the next Hitler and then standing back and condemning “all political violence” who benefit from the carnage.

If Trump really is Hitler 2.0, then what’s the argument against assassinating him? And if he isn’t, then Democrats and their media have spent years ginning up a rationale for killing a political opponent.

The media, rather than pulling back, doubled down with NBC News describing how “today’s apparent assassination attempt comes amid increasingly fierce rhetoric on the campaign trail. Mr. Trump, his running mate JD Vance continue to make baseless claims about Haitian immigrants” as if Trump’s comments about the chaos in Ohio is to blame for a Democrat trying to assassinate him.

There have been 2 assassination attempts in 3 months. How long until there’s a third? And will this one succeed?

https://www.frontpagemag.com/kamala-supporter-attempted-to-assassinate-trump/

Shots were fired at Trump’s golf club in West Palm Beach on Sunday afternoon at 1:30 pm as the former president was playing a round of golf with real estate investor Steve Witkoff.

It is unclear if the suspect was able to fire his weapon (AK-47 with a scope) or if the Secret Service shot at him first after they identified him as a threat.

Officials have confirmed that the gunman targeted President Trump.

The FBI is calling Sunday’s shooting an attempted assassination.

Trump and everyone who was on the golf course with him is safe.

According to the Associated Press, the gunman pushed the muzzle of his rifle through the fence line at Trump’s golf course before Secret Service agents fired at him.

Law enforcement said the gunman was about 300 to 500 yards away from Trump.

“The golf course was partially shut down for Trump as he played, and agents were a few holes ahead of him when they noticed the person with the firearm, the officials said,” the AP reported.

“The person appeared to push the muzzle of the rifle through the fence line and that’s when agents fired, the officials said.” AP said.

According to reporters for The AP, there are several areas around the perimeter of Trump’s golf course where golfers are visible from the fence line.

It appears the gunman exploited a vulnerable part of the property’s perimeter.

“There are several areas around the perimeter of the property where golfers are visible from the fence line. News photographers learned those areas well so they could capture photos of Trump when he was golfing there as president.” AP reported.

The suspect ran out of the bushes and escaped in a black vehicle but he was arrested in Martin County.

Fox News host Sean Hannity said he spoke with Trump three times in the immediate aftermath of the shooting.

Hannity said Trump was on the 5th hole about to putt when he heard “pop, pop, pop, pop” — within seconds the Secret Service pounced on the president, covered him.”

“You had snipers with tripods…long story short… the gun has been found, they have identified it as an AK-47,” Hannity said.

Hannity said that law enforcement used drone footage to identify the suspect getting into his vehicle after dropping his firearm.

Read more:

BREAKING: ATTEMPTED ASSASSINATION: Gunman Pushed Rifle’s Muzzle Through Fence Line at Trump Golf Club Before Secret Service Agents Fired

By Andrea Widburg

The Black Insurrectionist did the legwork and obtained what appears to be a duly signed affidavit from an ABC employee attesting under oath to the network’s staggering corruption to ensure that Kamala Harris won her single debate against Donald Trump. Secret negotiations, bias, squashed issues, sample questions…it’s all there. Of course, we have only this unknown employee’s sworn assertion that these things happened but, if they did…oh my!

Here’s the tweet with the somewhat redacted affidavit:

Here are the 6 pages of the affidavit for easier sharing. I made an error in the original posting. I duplicated page 5. I would also like to note that there are several pages after the verification page that were specifics about the job the whistleblower did and a transcript of… pic.twitter.com/WrszRRGl9E

— Black Insurrectionist–I FOLLOW BACK TRUE PATRIOTS (@DocNetyoutube) September 15, 2024

The introductory material in the affidavit says that the employee is a technical and administrative worker who is not endorsing Trump. He (or she) simply wants want all Americans want—a fair debate allowing Americans to hear what the candidates have to say on the issues that matter most. The key substantive allegations (which currently have no verification other than this sworn testimony) are as follows:

The important people at ABC involved in the debate were known to be biased, which worried employees:

It is common knowledge that Debate Moderators as well as Chief Executive Officers of my employer are well known not to support Donald Trump, this led to several employees speaking up in regards to how fair the debate was going to be. We were given assurances that the debate would be fair and neither the Harris campaign nor the Trump campaign would the Trump campaign would [redacted] unfair advantage.

In fact, nothing was fair.

ABC allegedly agreed to Kamala’s demands for accommodations so that she would not appear at a visual disadvantage compared to Trump (accommodations that our geo-political opponents such as Xi Jinping or Kim Jong-un won’t be making):

The Harris campaign received particular accommodations, including, but not limited to, the providing of a podium significantly smaller than that used by Donald Trump, and assurances regarding split-screen television views that would favorably impact Kamala Harris’s appearance relative to Donald Trump.

ABC News allegedly ensured Kamala’s team that it would make every effort to fact-check anything Donald Trump said. (What’s implied, although not stated, is that no such effort would be made to fact-check Kamala.) The Trump campaign was shut out of these negotations.

It was agreed that Donald Trump would be subjected to fact-checking during the debate, while Kamala Harris would not face comparable scrutiny. This was widely known throughout the company that Donald Trump would be fact checked. In fact, various people were assigned to fact check observations it was perceived candidate Trump would make during the debate. In fact, Harris campaign required assurances that Donald Trump would be fact checked. This was done via multiple communications with the Harris campaign whereas the Trump campaign was not included in the negotiations. To my understanding, any rules negotiations and conversations pertaining to the debate should have had both the Trump and Harris campaign involved, the Harris campaign had numerous more calls regarding the debate rules without the Trump campaign aware or on the call.

While Kamala did not receive the exact question the moderators asked, she allegedly received sample questions so she’d know generally what to expect. This assertion, if true, explains the very careful language ABC used when it denied any allegations that it gave Kamala the questions before the debate: “Harris was not given any questions before the debate.”

The Harris campaign was provided with sample questions that, while not the exact questions, covered similar topics that would appear during the debate.

Kamala allegedly put several topics off limits, including Joe Biden’s mental state, her time as Attorney General in San Francisco (this probably means her stint as District Attorney in San Francisco, when she convicted hundreds of low-level drug offenders, most of whom were black), and her brother-in-law, Tony West, the man who funneled billions of taxpayer dollars to hard-left NGOs.

Furthermore, the Harris campaign-imposed restrictions on the scope of questioning, including:

• No questions regarding the perceived health of President Joe Biden.

• No inquiries related to her tenure as Attorney General in San Francisco.

• No questions concerning her brother-in-law, Tony West, who faces allegations of embezzling billions of dollars in taxpayer funds and who may be involved in her administration if elected.

The affidavit closes by saying, among other things, that the affiant “sent a certified letter to Speaker Mike Johnson, dated September 9th, 2024, to establish a record that the correspondence was sent before the debate commenced.” And—what should worry ABC and Kamala’s campaign—the affiant claims to

have secretly recorded several conversations that will prove that the Harris Campaign insisted upon not only the Fact Checking of Donald Trump, but also insisted on what questions were not to be asked under any circumstances or else the Harris campaign would decline to participate in the debate.

Again, we currently have only one unnamed source, although that person seems to have been willing to subject himself or herself to the penalty of perjury. Moreover, she or he may have recordings to back this up. If you want additional corroboration for the claimed bias, Linsey Davis admitted that she went out of her way to “fact check” Trump (although, as it turns out, Trump was factually correct, and Kamala was wrong).

It’ll be interesting to see whether the dam now breaks with other people coming forward to back up these accusations. It will be even more interesting to learn whether Americans care that a major media outlet allegedly connived with the Democrat candidate to throw the debate her way and destroy Donald Trump.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/09/an_abc_employee_s_sworn_affidavit_claims_abc_cheated_to_help_kamala_win.html

OMG!! TikTok took down those videos of walz dancing like the gay boy he is. They are “unavailable”.

This is Tim Walz He says JD Vance is Weird. Is this what you want America???!

This is Tim Walz
He says JD Vance is Weird.
Is this what you want America???! pic.twitter.com/6XKgZINGjB

— Vicki WarriortoTruth 📖🛡⚔️🇺🇸♥️ (@Warriortotruth) September 11, 2024

On today’s #NCFWhittle we are joined by businessman, writer and director Alan Miller, co-founder of TOGETHER, a campaigning organisation with hundreds of thousands of supporters across the UK. Established as a movement of the public, for the public, Together fights back against Britain’s increasingly authoritarian governing elite.