Former Teen Trans Activist Accused Of Administering Fatal Dose Of Fentanyl To Boyfriend

A former teen trans activist is under investigation in relation to the death of a man in Lake Township, Ohio. William John “Selena Leyc” Milligan, 29, was arrested last week after failing to appear in court for a preliminary hearing.

Milligan was first named as a suspect in the death of Kodiak Solomon in December of 2023, though the investigation into Solomon’s death has been ongoing since December of 2021. That year, emergency personnel responded to a call from the trailer home Milligan and Solomon shared on Loyalville Outlet Road in Lake Township.

Milligan told police that he and Solomon, who were in a relationship, had been watching television, but at around 2 a.m., he noticed Solomon was unresponsive. Milligan told investigators that he attempted to perform CPR on Solomon before making the call to 911. He also placed bags of ice on Solomon’s legs and arms, claiming he had heard it was helpful for overdose victims.

According to the Times Leader, emergency medical personnel administered Narcan at the site, but were unable to revive Solomon. An autopsy determined Solomon died of a fentanyl overdose.

Kodiak “Kody” Solomon. Source: FACEBOOK

But the investigation into Solomon’s death revealed a number of details that local police and prosecutors found suspicious.

Milligan was found to have been in possession of a video he had taken that night of Solomon while the man was fatally overdosing. Milligan claimed he had shot the footage “to show the victim what he looked like when he was overdosing.”

The video’s timestamp revealed that Solomon had overdosed and gone unresponsive over two hours before 911 was called, despite Milligan claiming he had only waited 15 minutes. In the video, Milligan can be heard expressing annoyance with the situation.

“Just to show it is 12:23, this is what I am dealing with again,” he says. The video shows Milligan pushing on Solomon’s chest as if doing chest compressions at that time.

Solomon’s social media history also suggests that his relationship with Milligan was littered with problems. Just two weeks before his overdose, Solomon reposted a meme to his Facebook which read: “Jack died because of Rose. Romeo died because of Juliet. Stay single if you want to live.”

Days later, he reposted an image featuring text reading: “I once loved someone so much that I tried to fix them while they were breaking me.”

A meme posted to Solomon’s Facebook account just one month before his death.

Just over two weeks following Solomon’s death, prosecutors charged Milligan with having administered the fatal dose of fentanyl. As reported by the Times Leader, Milligan surrendered at the office of District Judge Brian Tupper in Kingston Township where he was arraigned and released on $20,000 unsecured bail.

Milligan was arrested last week after failing to appear in court for a preliminary hearing on charges of drug delivery resulting in death. Police state that Milligan was detained following a traffic stop, and was found in possession of an unspecific drug.

It is currently unknown if Milligan is being charged as a “male” or as a “female.” His legal name is being used in court documents, suggesting he has not yet formally changed his identification.

However, Milligan has a history as a trans activist dating back to when he was just 15 years old and first began to identify as transgender. Milligan was profiled by local news in 2010, and spoke out against bullying and transphobia on the Steve Wilkos Show.

“Prompted by the recent string of gay teenage suicides, Milligan, with the support of her family, is coming out and speaking out on national TV this Friday to tell teens like her that suicide shouldn’t be an option and to tell bullies to lay off,” the article reads. Quotes from Milligan’s parents are included, who encourage other families to “support your kids no matter what they decide to do or change.”

Milligan also expressed a desire to create a resource center or website for transgender youth.

https://reduxx.info/former-teen-trans-activist-accused-of-administering-fatal-dose-of-fentanyl-to-boyfriend/

Manchester Police arrests 4 Muslim community members for brutally assaulting 3 airport staff and a police officer, viral video used to peddle ‘Islamophobia’ claims

Image- Police officer attacked (viral video)

On Wednesday, July 23, the Manchester Police arrested 4 individuals belonging to the Muslim community for assaulting an emergency staff at the Manchester Airport and obstructing police. The video of the incident is making rounds on social media where the police can be seen tackling them after the latter launched an attack on the police and the airport staff. However, the video is being used by Islamists to spread ‘Islamophobia’ claims saying that Police assaulted them because they are Muslims. Several mainstream media reports also reported the incident and said that they didn’t know what sparked the incident.

Notably, the Greater Manchester Police released a statement exposing the truth. “We know that our communities are rightly concerned by video footage which is being circulated online, that shows armed police officers responding to an incident at Manchester Airport. In advance of what is shown in the video, we were called to reports of an assault at Manchester Airport. The suspect was seen on CCTV at the ticket counter of the car park and the officers reached to arrest him,” the statement read.

Wasin Chaudhury, Assistant Chief Constable added, “During our response, three officers were assaulted, one female officer suffered a broken nose and the other officers were forced to the ground and suffered injuries that required hospital treatment.”

The police confirmed that 4 individuals accused of assault on airport staff and attack on police were arrested. However, several Islamists are spreading the video claiming that the Muslims were brutally assaulted by the Manchester police for belonging to a specific community.

The incident has sparked outrage in the community with Islamists demanding action against the officers or they will unleash protests like never seen before. The Islamists claim that the police unnecessarily arrested the Muslims, further claiming ‘Islamophobia’. Reportedly, the Islamists are making no mention of assault on the police or the airport staff after which the Muslim heads were forced to face such action by the police.

Others on X shared the video calling it brutal and demanding the strictest action against UK officers. “This is absolutely brutal and disgusting. Make this go viral These officers need to be fired,” a user on X claimed.

One Attiq Malik, who claims to be a criminal lawyer, also posted a video calling out the police action. “Enough is enough. This is not policing by consent. It’s time to put them in their place. This is brutal. This is not why we pay the council taxes,” he posted.

Notably, several Muslims reached the police station on 24th July evening, demanding the release of the accused persons who broke the nose of the female officer and attacked three others. The Muslim community protested and demanded action against the police instead.

Several media outlets also reported the incident claiming that the UK police brutally kicked the Muslim man’s head. However, they said that they actually didn’t know what sparked the incident.

Another similar report by Siasat Daily reported that a Muslim boy was kicked by the Greater Manchester Police.

However, the Greater Manchester Police shared the entire incident and said that the police were called by the Airport staff after an altercation at Terminal 2 of the Manchester Airport. The police reached the airport, checked the CCTV, and spotted the suspect at the ticket counter. The accused further attacked the police and broke the nose of a female police officer after which the police had to act.

UK: Manchester Police arrests 4 Muslims for brutally assaulting 3 airport staff and obstructing police (opindia.com)

Leaked documents: German gov’t lied about shots preventing COVID, knew lockdowns did more harm than good

Berlin, Germany – 24 March 2020: The sign in front of the Robert Koch-Institut in Berlin. Shutterstock

Leaked documents from a top German health agency show that politicians knew the experimental COVID shots did not prevent the transmission of the virus but advocated for jab mandates anyway.

On July 23, independent journalist Aya Velázquez published the un-redacted miutes of the German Robert Koch Institut (RKI, comparable to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) from its meetings regarding the COVID crisis between 2020 and 2023. Velázquez said she received the un-redacted documents from a whistleblower who used to work for the RKI. Parts of the so-called “RKI files” had already been published in March this year, after the RKI was forced to publish them due to a lawsuit. However, many key parts of the files had been redacted.

Velázquez wrote that the now fully un-redacted files show “that the RKI unfortunately spoke out in favor of both facility-based and general compulsory vaccination despite the knowledge of the lack of protection from transmission and serious side effects.”

The minutes from an RKI meeting on November 5, 2021, demonstrate that the idea of a “pandemic of the unvaccinated” that was propagated by politicians and mainstream media members was made up and not based on any facts.

“The media are talking about a pandemic of the unvaccinated,” the minutes state. “From a factual point of view this is not correct, the entire population is contributing. Should this be taken up in communication?”

The document noted that this phrase, although factually incorrect, “serves as an appeal to all those who have not been vaccinated to get vaccinated.”

It furthermore states that the minister of health “says it at press conference, presumably deliberately, cannot be corrected.”

During the fall and winter months of 2021 and early 2022, German politicians repeatedly used the term “pandemic of the unvaccinated” to blame those who refused the experimental COVID jabs for “the pandemic” and all COVID-related measures. The government also used this line of reasoning to ban the unjabbed from participating in many parts of society, including having certain jobs, attending restaurants, shopping at stores, and many other areas.

German radiologist and chairman of the World Medical Association Frank Ulrich Montgomery even spoke of a “tyranny of the unvaccinated,” a statement that he doubled down on a year later.

Epoch Times Deutsch said that during this time, the unvaxxed faced “a level of exclusionary pressure that is unprecedented in the history of the Federal Republic of Germany.”

During the press conference held by the team around the journalist Aya Velázquez, Professor Stefan Homburg said an entry in the documents from March 19, 2021, showed that the RKI already knew that the AstraZeneca COVID shot had caused several cases of sinus vein thrombosis, barely 11 weeks into the “vaccination” campaign.

Homburg is an emeritus professor of economics who was the head of the public finance department of the Leibniz University in Hannover and who became one of the most well-known and formidable critics of the COVID tyranny in Germany.

Homburg furthermore said that the RKI files showed that the RKI and the Paul Ehrlich Institut (PEI) deliberately gave false testimony in court, for instance, in regard to protecting German soldiers against transmission of the virus. “In this respect, they could now be charged in court for unsworn testimony with reference to these minutes,” said Homburg.

According to the available data, Homburg said that the overall situation can be described as a “deception of the public.”

He told the Epoch Times that “the authorities deliberately deceived the public for years at the behest of politicians.”

Journalist Bastian Barucker told the Epoch Times that the documents showed that when Health Minister Jens Spahn announced school closures in November 2021, the RKI “had long known that this was not correct.”

In parts of the RKI files that were already released in March, the minutes of a meeting from January 11, 2023, show that the RKI knew that lockdowns cause more harm than good. “The consequences of the lockdown are sometimes more severe than Covid itself,” the document stated.

At the conclusion of the press conference, Velázquez said, “The RKI protocols prove it: Our corona policy was not based on rational, scientific considerations.”

“Numerous political decisions, such as 2G [full participation in society only given to vaxxed or recovered individuals], the facility-based and planned general vaccination mandate, or the vaccination of children, were purely political decisions for which the RKI, as an authority bound by instructions, provided an alleged scientific legitimation,” the journalist said.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/leaked-documents-german-govt-lied-about-shots-preventing-covid-knew-lockdowns-did-more-harm-than-good/?utm_source=most_recent&utm_campaign=usa

French TV channel hosting right-ring show taken off the air by regulator

The French TV channel C8 hosting popular Right-wing show Touche pas à mon Poste presented by Cyril Hanouna will be taken off the air by 2025 following a decision of the French audiovisual authority (Arcom.) Photo: https://www.fdesouche.com/

The French TV channel C8, known for airing the popular right-wing show Touche pas à mon Poste hosted by Cyril Hanouna, will cease operations by 2025 following a ruling by the Regulatory Authority for Audiovisual and Digital Communication (Arcom).

Arcom’s decision, based on what it said was “the interest of each project for the public with regard to the overriding imperative of pluralism”, came after a review of proposals from 24 TV channels, including C8, which is owned by media mogul Vincent Bolloré, in July.

The authority chose not to reallocate a digital terrestrial television slot to C8.

The channel’s renewal was in jeopardy due to controversies surrounding Touche pas à mon Poste and Hanouna.

It has faced 23 sanctions since 2016, with more than half occurring in the past four years, primarily involving Hanouna’s on-air behaviour.

In February 2023, the show was fined €3.5 million for comments he made during a heated exchange with guest MP Louis Boyard, which Arcom deemed violated the guest’s rights and reputation.

During the recent French snap elections, Hanouna also faced issues with his programme On marche sur la Tête on Europe 1, another Bolloré-owned outlet, which received a formal Arcom notice for “lack of moderation and honesty”.

Despite C8 deciding to broadcast Touche pas à mon Poste with a delay of up to 45 minutes to mediate further Hanouna outbursts, Arcom decided to pull the plug on one of the Conservative billionaire Bolloré’s popular shows.

C8 channel is the entertainment sister channel of the news station CNews and part of the Canal+ group in Bolloré’s stable.

CNews, another channel often reprimanded by Arcom, will remain on air despite being fined €80,000 on July 10 for presenting what the body deemed were unbalanced views on migration and climate change.

Critics argued that decision was politically motivated.

Olivier Truchot of BFMTV‘s Les Grandes Gueules show suggested that Arcom’s decision was both factual and political.

“Arcom undoubtedly took this decision for factual reasons, non-compliance with specifications and sanctions. But there’s also the fact that there’s Vincent Bolloré, who is criticised for a political project with very right-wing and anti-Macronist oriented channels,” he said on July 24.

“Then there’s Cyril Hanouna, the most emblematic and controversial person on the French TV airwaves, and we’re going to say we’re censoring him,” he added.

Eric Ciotti, ally of French hard-right National Rally party leader Marine Le Pen and head of the right-wing The Republicans in the French Parliament also criticised the decision, labelling it a “democratic scandal”.

“Are we still a country of freedom? Friends of power are rewarded, and others are punished. The most popular free channel is gagged. Deadly drift for our democracy,” he said.

Others welcomed the regulator’s move.

“With this decision, Arcom has drawn the first logical conclusions from the excesses of the antennas controlled by Vincent Bolloré,” said Thibault Bruttin, Managing Director of international media NGO Reporters Without Borders France.

French TV channel hosting right-ring show taken off the air by regulator – Brussels Signal

Teams With Trans-Identified Male Cyclists Win Top Three Spots At Women’s Bike Race In Washington

Images collected by @i_heart_bikes [X]

Three trans-identified males were on the winner’s podium at a race in Washington last week, marking the first time men won first, second, and third place in a women’s race.

The Marymoor Grand Prix is an annual track bike race at the Jerry Baker Memorial Velodrome in Redmond, Washington. The venue is known for its strict “no bullying” policy, which warns that it will not tolerate any derogatory remarks or criticism towards racers. The warning has become significant in recent years, especially as relates to protecting athletes on the basis of their “gender identity,” as males have been known to regularly compete in women’s races at the track.

The Grand Prix was no different, as at least three men were present in the female category during the women’s Madison race, a high-speed, two-person relay. During the race, one partner from each team starts while the “resting” partner pedals slowly along the top of the track. Partners exchange positions by pulling even with each other and then relaying or “slinging” the incoming partner into the race.

At least three Madison teams at the Grand Prix featured one female, and one male who identified as a “woman.”

Jenna Lingwood, Jordan Lothrop, and Eva Lin were the three men recorded as being present on Madison teams, and each had previously competed with other men.

Lothrop, a cyclist from Canada who had been racing with men as recently as 2023, came in first place with his female teammate. In second place was Lingwood, formerly James, who is the women’s masters 40+ national cyclocross champion, with his female teammate. And in third was Lin, who used to race as Henry Lin for San Jose State University’s men’s team, with his female teammate.

The wins were first highlighted by a women’s rights advocate on X who monitors males self-identifying into women’s cycling. The user, @i_heart__bikes, sarcastically questioned why the three teams with males beat out the all-female teams.

“I wonder what gave those teams an edge over the 100% female teams?” She asked.

In July of 2023, the world governing body for cycling, UCI, banned transgender athletes from participating in any of their events if they had gone through male puberty. UCI determined that the previous barrier, restricting testosterone levels, was not “sufficient to completely eliminate the benefits of testosterone during puberty in men,” their statement noted.

“Given the current state of scientific knowledge, it is also impossible to rule out the possibility that biomechanical factors such as the shape and arrangement of the bones in their limbs may constitute a lasting advantage for female transgender athletes,” the statement read.

David Lappartient, the president of UCI, said that the governing body had a “duty to guarantee, above all, equal opportunities” for all competitors in cycling competitions. 

“It is this imperative that led the UCI to conclude that, given the current state of scientific knowledge does not guarantee such equality of opportunity between transgender female athletes and cisgender female participants, it was not possible, as a precautionary measure, to authorize the former to race in the female categories,” he explained.

British Cycling had introduced their own policy two months prior, creating an “open” third category where anyone of any gender identity and sex would be allowed to compete. The female category would be restricted only to biological women, including those who identified as transgender, but who had yet to undertake hormone therapy.

However, as noted by the Independent Council on Women’s Sports, USA Cycling has not adopted these new, stricter policies that prevent biological males from competing with and beating women and girls.

https://reduxx.info/teams-with-trans-identified-male-cyclists-win-top-three-spots-at-womens-bike-race-in-washington/

‘Allah will judge”: Candles were vandalised and a sacristan attacked by a man who spoke Arabic at the Basilica of Notre-Dame in Nice, France

A person entered the Basilica of Notre Dame de l’Assomption in Nice, poured water on the candles and then on the sexton who approached him, said prayers in Arabic, recited verses from the Quran and shouted ‘Allah will judge’, a police source reported at around 1.45pm on Wednesday.

The sexton triggered the alarm button, whereupon the city police quickly intervened.

The 29-year-old suspect, who is known to the French intelligence service TAJ, is not reported to the territorial intelligence service and suffers from mental health problems, was arrested and taken into police custody. There were no injuries.

Amaury Brelet / Valeurs actuelles

Germany’s left-wing extremist Interior Minister Faeser wanted to ban an Islamist organisation and instead banned the Chanel fashion brand out of incompetence

Wikimedia Commons , 
arz
PD-self

Faeser’s ministry wanted to ban the Islamic centre’s social media presence – but mistyped the ban. Instead, the Chanel fashion brand’s YouTube channel is now banned.
Nancy Faeser actually wanted to send a signal against Islamism with her ban on the Islamic Centre Hamburg (IZH), a proxy of the Iranian regime with close ties to terrorism – especially after the controversial Compact raid. However, the ministry has apparently made an embarrassing mistake.

The ban order lists various social media channels that must also be shut down as part of the ban on the IZH. These include the channel of the Islamic Centre Berlin, a sister association of the IZH in Hamburg. The officials and lawyers at the Federal Ministry of the Interior, who had prepared the order, made a small but crucial mistake. Apparently they typed in the URL of the Islamic Centre Berlin’s YouTube channel by hand – and mistyped it. They forgot an ‘N’.
However, this has far-reaching legal consequences: Due to this one typo, the link that is supposed to define the YouTube channel to be banned no longer leads to the IZ Berlin – but to the channel of the famous fashion brand Chanel. The prohibition order now officially concerns the French fashion company.
This is certainly a typo – but one that is now actually legally valid. The Federal Ministry of the Interior has not yet commented on this faux pas.

Wegen Tippfehler: Faeser verbietet statt Islamisten aus Versehen YouTube-Kanal von Chanel – Apollo News (apollo-news.net)

Pim Fortuyn: A Dutch Foreboding of the Target on Trump

The statue of Pim Fortuyn in Rotterdam. Artist: Corry Ammerlaan-van Niekerk
Wouter Engler, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Like many others, I was shocked—but perhaps not surprised—to hear about the attempted assassination of Donald Trump. Many people who follow politics suspected that this would perhaps happen one day—as if it was written in the stars. How did we get to this point? As a Dutchman, I already lived this experience. At the turn of the last century, we had a similar case in Holland where a man, Pim Fortuyn, coming from the fringes of the establishment, caused uproar in daily politics and even threatened to sink the establishment itself.

Who was Pim Fortuyn? In most of the English-speaking media, there are only snippets about this case, most of them delivered by the opponents of Fortuyn, housed throughout Dutch politics and media. Fortuyn was a golden wizard-apprentice of the Dutch state: a convinced Marxist and a member of the Dutch Communist and later Labor party in his early years. His academic career was very successful, Fortuyn eventually rising to the level of professor at the University of Groningen, specialising in “Marxist Sociology”.

Fortuyn managed a notable public-facing project for the Dutch state: a travel product for students, which I used myself for six years, to my great satisfaction. To date, it is the only publicly known Dutch government project delivered on time and within budget.

Until 1993, Fortuyn operated within the dogmas of Dutch politics but then became a pundit for Elsevier magazine, where his contributions culminated in the 2002 book De puinhopen van acht jaar Paars (The Wreckage of Eight Years of Purple). He critiqued the Dutch governments of the 1990s, praising the economic progress of that era, but then attacking most of the social policies of the time.

Fortuyn’s political rise began In February 1997, when he published the book Against the Islamization of our Culture—in which he argued that modern Western liberal values are contrary to Islamic beliefs and that immigration from the Middle East to Europe should be stopped. Today, that might cause a tempest in a teacup and some mild pearl-clutching but back then, it was reason enough for well-known Dutch commentator of the day Marcel van Dam to call him an “exceptionally inferior person”. Thus began the process of his demonization.

The next five years were quick, noisy, and violent, ending in the death of Fortuyn by shooting.

In the finest traditions of the European Left—think Stalin turning on Bukharin: “Koba, why do you need me to die?”—the Dutch state and the Labor party immediately did a 180 turn on Pim Fortuyn. It is here that the paths of Pim Fortuyn and Donald Trump become strikingly similar. Trump was a mainstay of the media and entertainment industries when he previously indulged in liberal behaviour, and was never short of women and selfies with Democrats. But when Trump became politically active for the Republicans, he magically became a racist/fascist ogre.

Fortuyn was a flamboyant gay professor who in personal charm and intellect towered far above the silly mediocrity that dominated the political scene in the Netherlands, before and after. Yet, when he suddenly broke with the grey mediocre pre-thought-out party slogans, the Labor party scrambled to compare him with Adolf Eichmann, the infamous Nazi bureaucrat of murder (to prevent litigation, the actual wording was of course much more sly than that).

The choice of going into politics after being a pundit was set in stone on November 25th, 2001, when Fortuyn was elected party leader by an overwhelming majority in the members’ meeting of Leefbaar Nederland. This was a short-lived victory, because on February 11th, 2002, the steering board of Leefbaar Nederland asked him to resign following some statements Fortuyn made in De Volkskrant on February 9th, 2002.

Fortuyn used a quote attributed to Voltaire— “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it”—before stating that he believed the constitution’s first article against discrimination should be abolished and that Islam is a backward culture incompatible with Western values. This clearly struck a raw nerve with an establishment that complimented itself on putting the article in the constitution. Legal experts have since determined that the article is indeed unworkable.

With supporters of Leefbaar Nederland, Pim Fortuyn almost immediately proposed his own party: the Lijst Pim Fortuyn, better known to history as the LPF. After the municipal elections in Rotterdam on March 6th, 2002 were won with more than 30%of the votes, Fortuyn was convinced that he would have a chance in the national elections for the House of Representatives on May 15th, 2002.

Barbs shot back and forth between the media and Fortuyn. The Netherlands’ press portrayed Fortuyn as the “Dutch Haider” (a reference to the then infamous Austrian politician), while Fortuyn told a Dutch female journalist that she would do a better job “cooking something”.

Things took a turn for the worse. Shortly after a radio interview for 3FM at the Mediapark in Hilversum, on May 6th, 2002, Pim Fortuyn was shot dead in a parking lot by Volkert van der Graaf, an Antifa and animal rights activist. All this happened just nine days before the elections for the House of Representatives.

During the elections on May 15th, 2002, the LPF received 1.3 million votes, good for 26 seats in the Dutch House of Representatives. Had Fortuyn lived, some private polls suggested that he might have gotten a clear majority of the seats in the House of Representatives—something unique in the Netherlands, where clear majorities don’t happen and government policy is typically based on some murky compromise.

During the verbal struggle with the Dutch media and Labor party, a caricature of Pim Fortuyn appeared, portraying him as a racist fanning the flames of the seedy underbelly of Dutch society, grossly and deliberately ignoring all the other things Fortuyn said and wrote about—things that provoked a spontaneous recognition of truth in the eyes of many Dutchmen. Some people started to embrace the media caricature of Fortuyn and Dutch politics returned to grey mediocrity again—i.e., the back-and-forth of predictable party slogans.

It was a small Dutch version of what is happening on a grander scale with Donald Trump: a political establishment going completely off its collective rocker by the uproar one man, arriving at the right time and place in history, can provoke.

Donald Trump also has an impressive list of enemies who don’t really care what is said or not, and he will do well to give speeches behind a plexiglass screen until next November.

Just to be sure.

https://europeanconservative.com/articles/commentary/pim-fortuyn-a-dutch-foreboding-of-the-target-on-trump/

Ireland migrant crisis branded ‘out of control’ as Sinn Fein pledges crack down: ‘Politicians think they OWN the country!’

Demonstrations broke out at a former paint factory in Coolock after locals opposed its alleged repurposing into a site for asylum seekers PA

Ongoing migrant protests in Ireland have been branded “out of control” as Sinn Féin has vowed to implement a “stricter immigration policy” for the country.

Protests have erupted at a former paint factory in Coolock, as locals opposed the location being earmarked as a site to house asylum seekers.

Taoiseach Simon Harris faces increasing pressure to crack down on immigration and has called the demonstrations in Coolock “reprehensible” and “thuggery”.

Sharing his thoughts on GB News, host Eamonn Holmes said the immigration crisis in Ireland is “out of control”, and warned of similar demonstrations “making their way to the UK” if numbers continue to surge.

Joined by Irish political correspondent Ben Scallon, he claimed that the immigration issues have been ongoing for “several years”, due to the “grandiose commitment by government to having a no cap policy when it came to asylum seekers”.

Scallan explained: “They said we will take as many as they can effectively, and were bracing to accept as many as 200,000 asylum seekers entering Ireland.

“For those who don’t know, the Republic of Ireland’s population is just over five million. So 200,000 in a country with a population of that size is astonishing.”

Noting the latest from President of Sinn Féin Mary Lou McDonald, who claimed locals “won’t have a veto” on who moves into their area, Eamonn asked Scallon when the “arrogance” displayed by the Irish government is going to disappear.

Scallon responded: “It’s a strange misunderstanding that has arisen in not just this country, but probably many Western countries, where politicians and the political class at large seem to be under the misapprehension that they own the country, when in fact it is the citizenry of the country who own the country.”

Scallon fumed: “Ireland does not belong to the politicians, they are people who have been temporarily bestowed with the right to manage it on behalf of the people as representatives.

“And so this whole you don’t have a veto, you can’t decide, well, then who can decide?”

Eamonn weighed in on the migration crisis affecting the West, claiming that “no one is able to solve it”.

He told GB News: “It appears that we’re losing control, I don’t care who you are in the world, none of us can solve the migration problem.

“So you’ve either got to decide, what are you going to do to tamper with it, or are you going to leave it alone? Are you going to put up the borders and say, ‘I’m sorry, it’s very unfortunate what you’re going through, but it’s not our problem’, and we only take extreme cases like those people affected by war?

“But goodness me, it’s obvious, we know we just can’t control it.”

When asked by Anne if the situation in Ireland is going to lead to “more protests” against Sinn Fein, Scallon responded: “It seems like we’re on that trajectory.

“They were warned about this in 2022 before things got out of control. They proceeded to ignore that advice and do it anyway, and now we’re at a situation where we’ve seen multiple riots.

“There’s these kinds of fiery scenes unfolding in working-class communities all over the country, and it is just ludicrous.”

https://www.gbnews.com/news/world/ireland-migrant-crisis-out-of-control-sinn-fein-crack-down

Germany bans Islamic Centre Hamburg for pursuing radical Islam: Read about its links with Iran and Hezbollah

Islamic Centre Hamburg banned by Germany for pursuing radical Islam (Image Source: IRCICA)

On Wednesday, the German government imposed a ban on the Islamic Centre Hamburg (IZH) and its related organisations, citing their alleged support for Lebanon’s Hezbollah militant group and the promotion of Iranian leadership ideology. The action came after police conducted raids on 53 properties nationwide.

Germany’s Interior Minister Nancy Faeser stated that evidence from investigations, including searches in November, confirmed serious concerns about the IZH’s activities. The IZH is accused of promoting an Islamist-extremist, totalitarian ideology in Germany and supporting Hezbollah.

The German Interior Ministry characterized the IZH as a “direct representative of Iran’s ‘Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution’,” alleging it forcefully spreads the ideology of the Islamic Revolution and aims to spark a similar revolution in Germany. The Islamic Centre Hamburg has been under surveillance by Germany’s domestic intelligence agency due to its connections to Hezbollah, which Germany deems a “Shiite terrorist organization” and banned from operating in the country since 2020.

Germany now joins nations like France and the United Kingdom among countries that are facing the wrath of changing demography and growing support for the radical strand of Islam among Muslim immigrants, especially in the wake of the Israel-Gaza war, with the Western media doubling as a witting or an unwitting accessory in pushing the Palestine propaganda and further inflaming resentment among Muslims around the world.

The horrific murder of French teacher Samuel Paty in October 2020, beheaded by an Islamist for allegedly blaspheming against Prophet Muhammad, triggered a reckoning among the French on their complex relationship with radical Islamists living in their midst. Since then, France has been systematically chipping away at the Islamist institutes that have been fuelling radicalism in French society. Last year, it imposed a nationwide ban on Islamic attire in schools, widely regarded as a symbol of fundamentalism and leads to segregation among students.

Similarly, in the United Kingdom across the English Channel, Islamism has been steadily nibbling away at the law and order framework that was once a source of pride for the country. The alarming deterioration of law and order manifested during the ghastly anti-Hindu violence that erupted in Leicester in October 2022, when Islamists ran riot, instigating their fellow co-religionists to ‘wipe out Hindus as they did in Kashmir’.

As Islamism rears its ominous head in Germany, the nation’s government decided to impose a ban on one of the most influential Islamic centres in the country. The centre has also faced accusations of spreading aggressive anti-semitism. Germany has been working to combat anti-semitism, which has increased following Israel’s devastating war on Gaza.

Founded by Iranian immigrants in 1953, the centre has long been a concern for German authorities.

The Islamic Centre Hamburg runs the Imam Ali Mosque, also referred to as the Blue Mosque. There have been increasing calls for its closure due to its alleged connections to Iran.

Following the ban, four Shiite mosques in Germany will be shut down, and the IZH’s assets will be seized.

Germany bans Islamic Centre Hamburg for pursuing radical Islam: Read about its links with Iran and Hezbollah (opindia.com)