Top LGBT group declared ‘transitions’ were ‘medically necessary’ to manipulate insurance companies

Getty Images

An influential transgender activist group known as the “World Professional Association for Transgender Health” (WPATH) incorporated policy language deeming “gender transition” procedures “medically necessary” into its official standards of care as a “tool” to pressure insurance companies to cover them rather than as an objective medical conclusion, according to recently-publicized court documents.

Released as part of a court filing in the ongoing lawsuit over Alabama’s ban on “transitioning” gender-confused minors, the emails include discussion of how to put WPATH’s 2016 declaration that “transitioning” is “medically necessary” to better advantage, the Washington Free Beacon reports.

“We needed a tool for our attorneys to use in defending access to care [i.e., “sex changes”],” one official wrote in January 2022. “The original Medical Necessity Statement was specific to the US because this was where we were experiencing the problem […] I have long wanted this (and many of our other policy statements) to become part of the [standards of care] because that gives them greater force.”

Further, despite public insistence that WPATH’s Standards of Care Version 8 (SOC-8) was formed with the “most rigorous protocol in the world,” the emails show that WPATH refused to publish the findings of Johns Hopkins researchers who concluded there was “little to no evidence” supporting WPATH’s desired conclusion.

“It is paramount that any publication based on the WPATH SOC8 data is thoroughly scrutinized and reviewed to ensure that publication does not negatively affect the provision of transgender healthcare [sic] in the broadest sense,” another email read.

Previous disclosures from the same lawsuit revealed that cross-dressing Biden administration assistant Health & Human Services (HHS) Secretary Richard “Rachel” Levine “strongly pressured WPATH leadership to rush the development and issuance of SOC-8], in order to assist with Administration political strategy,” specifically by pushing for the elimination of minimum-age guidelines.

significant body of evidence shows that “affirming” gender confusion carries serious harms, especially when done with impressionable children who lack the mental development, emotional maturity, and life experience to consider the long-term ramifications of the decisions being pushed on them, or full knowledge about the long-term effects of life-altering, physically-transformative, and often-irreversible surgical and chemical procedures.

Studies find that more than 80% of children suffering gender dysphoria outgrow it on their own by late adolescence and that “transition” procedures, including full “reassignment” surgery, fail to resolve gender-confused individuals’ heightened tendency to engage in self-harm and suicide — and even exacerbate it, including by reinforcing their confusion and neglecting the actual root causes of their mental strife.

So-called “gender-affirming” physicians have also been caught on video admitting to more old-fashioned motives for such procedures, as with an 2022 exposé about Vanderbilt University Medical Center’s Clinic for Transgender Health, where Dr. Shayne Sebold Taylor said outright that “these surgeries make a lot of money.”

The Biden administration’s own Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) released a since-deleted report last year acknowledging that “lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults are more likely than straight adults to use substances, experience mental health conditions including major depressive episodes, and experience serious thoughts of suicide.”

Yet the White House refuses to retreat an inch from any major aspect of the LGBT agenda: reopening the military to recruits afflicted with gender dysphoria, promoting gender ideology within the military (including “diversity” and drag events on military bases), holding events to “affirm transgender kids,” condemning state laws against underage “transitions” as “close to sinful,” promoting underage “transitions” (potentially at taxpayer expense) as a “best practice,” and trying to force federally funded schools to let males into female athletic competitions and restrooms.

Top LGBT group declared ‘transitions’ were ‘medically necessary’ to manipulate insurance companies – LifeSite (lifesitenews.com)

Labour Stops Free Speech Law a Week Before It Comes Into Force

Photo: Sergio on Flickr

New government powers to financially punish universities and student unions for failing to protect freedom of speech look doomed—without having collected a penny in fines. Labour education secretary Bridget Phillipson announced Friday that she will “stop further commencement of the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023” to consider other options.

The ‘paused’ legislation would have allowed the Office for Students (OfS), a UK regulator, to penalise institutions where, for instance, the cancellation of events under duress threatened free expression.

Britain’s incoming Labour government has presented its move as reducing the administrative burden on the OfS, allowing it to pivot to the potential problem of insolvent universities collapsing. But the devil is in the details: while signalling that free speech is no longer an official priority, the vague “strengthened protections for students facing harassment” are, with all the potential for mission creep that implies.

The Higher Education Freedom of Speech Act (HEFOSA) was given Royal Assent in May 2023, after three years’ gestation as a half-hearted Tory response to campus protests targeting ‘gender-critical’ and other supposedly controversial speakers. It required higher education providers, their constituent institutions, and students’ unions to uphold the principles of freedom of speech and academic freedom. Individuals could also bring lawsuits against institutions that failed to protect their right to free speech. Critics argue that relying “on the law to alter the political climate on campuses is a folly. Free speech cannot be enforced by government decree without ceasing to be, well, free.” 

Responses to Phillipson’s announcement show that absolutely no one actually cares about the administrative pressures on the OfS. (Any hypothetical fines levied could add to the risk of university bankruptcies, supposedly.) University and College Union general secretary Jo Grady went through the motions about the changing role of the OfS, before stating:

We have long called for the government to end its obsession with culture wars on campus and are delighted Labour has listened to us and dropped absurd proposals for free speech fines. … These plans were always a Trojan horse for stoking the culture war and it is right that Labour has dropped them.

“Many of us were truly dreading the impact this Act would have, serving to further divide our campuses and put marginalised student communities further at risk,” National Union of Students (NUS) vice-president Saranya Thambirajah told the BBC.

While these higher education figureheads took a cavalier approach to academic freedom, the Free Speech Union tweeted:

The Government’s attack on the Freedom of Speech Act is shocking. If Labour refuses to commence legislation passed in the last parliament, the Free Speech Union will bring judicial review proceedings … There is a free speech crisis in our universities.

To date, the membership of Academics for Academic Freedom (AFAF) has held a range of opinions on HEFOSA, but its director, Professor Dennis Hayes, called this:

A shocking but predictable decision. But the struggle for free speech must go on regardless. Thank goodness for Academics For Academic Freedom, The Free Speech Union and other groups fighting for free speech.

“The NUS was ‘truly dreading the impact’ of the act. Indeed. It may have forced them to defend free speech on campus, something they have been failing to do since 1974,” Hayes also noted.

In a comment to The European Conservative, AFAF called the decision “entirely predictable but shocking to many individuals and groups who had vested five years of work into building the Act,” and added,

Fighting for free speech is never-ending and things may get worse. If, or when, the government introduces new legislation on race, Islamophobia and other DEI issues, this will certainly suppress free speech as it will make criticising certain views more difficult. Such criticism will require academics to speak up ‘against the law’.  Will ‘free speech within the law’ mean fewer freedoms under Labour?

https://europeanconservative.com/articles/news/labour-stops-free-speech-law-a-week-before-it-comes-into-force/

German publisher drops Vance’s book Hillbilly Elegy over alliance with Trump

Wikimedia Commons , Gage Skidmore from Surprise, AZ, United States of America, CC-BY-SA-2.0

German publishing house Ullstein Buchverlage has sparked outrage by deciding against a reprint of the sold-out German translation of Hillbilly Elegy, the 2016 autobiography of JD Vance, the newly picked running mate of US presidential hopeful Donald Trump.

Ullstein cited Vance’s alliance with Trump and his policies as the reason.

Hillbilly Elegy tells of Vance’s upbringing in a poor Ohio town and shines a light on the plight of poor rural whites in the US, often referred to pejoratively as “hillbillies’.

The book, first published in 2016 and made into a movie in 2020, has jumped to the top position on The New York Times‘ bestseller list after Trump chose Vance as his candidate for the vice presidency on July 18.

Ullstein published the German translation of Hillbilly Elegy in 2017 and held the rights for it until recently. The book has since sold out. When asked about a reprint the publishing house informed the press that it had not renewed the contract for the rights and decided against reprinting it in German. The publisher’s author page has already been deleted.

The company quoted Vance’s allegiance with  Trump and his politics as the reason in a statement to German media: “At the time of its publication, the book made a valuable contribution to understanding the drifting apart of US society.”

Back then Vance had offered an authentic portrayal of growing up in the impoverished white working class, and at the time he had repeatedly distanced himself fromTrump. “In the meantime, he is officially acting alongside him and advocating an aggressively demagogic, exclusionary policy”, the statement continued.

According to a source close to the matter, the decision not to renew the rights had been taken a year ago – after Vance ran for senate in Ohio with Trump’s support.

Ullstein could have still have reprinted Hillbilly Elegy before the rights expired, but decided against it.

The decision has sparked outrage among German commentators. It has been called a case of cancel culture and financial folly.

German author Gerd Buurmann ironically expressed relief that Ullstein had just thrown Vance’s book out of its catalogue and not into the fire – a reference to the notorious book burnings instigated by the National Socialists in the 1930s.

Ullstein is a subsidiary of Bonnier Group, a Swedish media concern. Brussels Signal has reached out to Bonnier CEO Erik Haegerstrand for comment. He responded: “All publishing decisions are made by the local publishing houses. In this case Ullstein. That’s a cornerstone of the Bonnier operating model for all publishing activities.”

The rights to Hillbilly Elegy in German have now been picked up by the Munich publishing house YES, which has announced a reprint of the book available for sale starting August 15.

German publisher drops Vance’s book Hillbilly Elegy over alliance with Trump – Brussels Signal

UK Trans Activist Charged With Murder Being Held in Women’s Prison

A trans-identified male from Brighton is being held in a women’s prison while on trial for the murder of his husband. Joanna Rowland-Stuart, 70, was previously an outspoken trans activist and served as the former director of the LGBT Community Safety Forum, an organization which worked directly with lawmakers and Sussex Police.

On the evening of May 27, medics were called to the home of Joanna and Andrew Rowland-Stuart, where the latter was found suffering from multiple stab wounds, reportedly from a samurai sword.

Stuart at Brighton Pride in 2018. Source: FACEBOOK

Despite efforts on the part of emergency personnel to save his life, the 70 year-old man was pronounced dead at the scene. Police then arrested Joanna on suspicion of murder, and he was remanded to Lewes prison, a facility for men, to await his hearing.

However, according to a recent update from Brighton and Hove News, Joanna, formerly known as John Stuart, was transferred at an unknown date within the past month to Downview in Surrey, a women’s prison.

Additionally, news outlets, most notably the BBC, have referred to Stuart simply as a “woman,” as did a press release published by Sussex Police after his arrest on May 31.

In 2006, the Irish Independent reported on the marriage of the two men as “Britain’s first civil transgender lesbian wedding.” At the time, Andrew Rowland was also identifying as transgender and used the feminine name ‘Angie.’ Some time later, he appears to have detransitioned, and was “living” as a man prior to his murder.

Images from Stuart and Roland’s civil union.

Reduxx can reveal that before their civil union, the couple regularly attended BDSM events in Brighton, with Stuart acting as an organizer and liaison for attendees. Stuart referred to himself as “Aurora Stormchild,” and styled himself as a female dominatrix.

Stuart was an active member of a BDSM club called Informed Consent, which billed itself as “the leading UK BDSM website” in 2002. The website offered a section for personals ads, linked to members’ blogs, connected various UK fetish communities, hosted chat groups, offered BDSM tutorials, and promoted sex shops.

Stuart was also the point of contact from 2002 to 2003 for meet-ups held at the Theatre Bar in the Marlborough Hotel. Stuart and Rowland appear to have first met each other while “living” as “women” and participating in the BDSM scene.

By tracing now-defunct email addresses, Reduxx located messages both Stuart and Rowland shared within a UK BDSM group located on Usenet. In September 2002, Rowland, using the name Angie, described himself as “subbie” (submissive) to Stuart, who used the handle JSAurora in the group.

Posting as ‘Aurora,’ Stuart interacted with members of the fetish community and demonstrated knowledge of all of the local fetish shops in Brighton.

One discussion in particular revolved around the closure of a fetish shop known as Kentucky Woman, which sold bondage equipment, sex toys, latex gear, lingerie, and so-called “sissy” dresses, or clothing intended to resemble the stereotypical attire of very young girls.

According to another post made in the forum, Stuart and Rowland held a BDSM wedding ceremony in September 2002 at a club called Acceptance located in Croydon. Writing about the experience, Stuart divulged that Rowland had previously been calling himself Angie, but as a symbolic gesture of ownership, Stuart decided to rename him Electra.

“Our ceremony (in which I renamed my girl Angie, giving her the name Electra, was about fifteen to twenty minutes long. Mme. Tytania (our High Priestess of Kink and the House Domme) asked Electra, who was kneeling on a pretty red heart shaped cushion, if she understood what the collar meant and its significance regarding her commitment, and asked her if she would honour that collar and obey Me,” wrote Stuart.

Sissy dress for sale through Kentucky Woman. The product name was marketed as “Esther“.

Rather than presenting each other with wedding rings, the two men, who were referring to themselves as lesbian women, instead locked each other in collars and chains.

“The collar was a purple suede leather collar with metal links, and a lead,” Stuart continued.

“I then locked the collar on Electra’s neck, then unlocked it and asked her once again if she really wanted this. Receiving an affirmative answer I relocked the collar on her neck and gave her the key. In another act of submission she put the key onto a silver chain which she kissed and then fastened round My wrist.”

A personal website created by Stuart in 2002 was located by Reduxx in which he describes himself as Aurora Stormchild, a “male to female pre-operative transsexual switch living in Brighton” and a “24/7 Domme to Electra.”

From the personal website created by Stuart under his BDSM moniker.

Among his hobbies, Stuart lists BDSM and clubbing, and indicates that he was active in an IRC bondage chat group.

Shortly after Stuart and Rowland began their relationship, Stuart became heavily involved in trans activism.

As early as 2006, Stuart was giving presentations on transgender ideology through PCS Proud, the LGBT wing of the PCU, a union for public sector employees. As the organization’s only designated transgender lead, Stuart apparently was responsible for the production or distribution of educational materials, as evidenced by a rudimentary website circa 2008.

One of the resources still available on the site at the time of this writing is a PDF file titled, “Words Can Hurt,” which describes a situation of bullying at work which results in the target of insults committing suicide.

“I heard them all the time, talking about me behind my back, whispering. I hated work… Words can kill… When the pills didn’t work I took a razor to my wrist. THINK ABOUT YOUR LANGUAGE,” the promotional material reads.

Stuart was also involved in the Brighton and Hove LGBT Community Safety Forum and, in 2015, laid a wreath of poppies in honor of LGBT service personnel during the Brighton Remembrance Day ceremony.

Following the news that Stuart had been quietly shuffled into the Downview women’s prison, concerned UK citizens have been raising questions on social media.

One women’s rights campaigner said she had spoken with Dr. Kate Coleman, formerly of the campaign group Keep Prisons Single Sex. A statement alleged to have been drafted by Coleman called attention to a February 2023 revision to UK’s prison policies regarding trans-identified inmates.

According to the updated measures, “transgender women who are sentenced to custody in the future will not be held in the general women’s estate if they retain male genitalia or have been convicted of a violent or sexual offence – unless in the most exceptional cases.”

As Stuart is awaiting trial for allegedly committing a violent murder, Coleman argued that “this allocation decision can, and should, be challenged.”

https://reduxx.info/exclusive-details-uk-trans-activist-charged-with-murder-being-held-in-womens-prison/

Two Months After Mannheim Stabbings: Survivors Are Still Recovering

Michael Stürzenberger
Photo: @MichaelStuerzi on X, 24 July 2024

It’s been almost two months since an Afghan failed asylum seeker killed 29-year-old police officer Rouven Laur in Mannheim, Germany. The Islamist attacker—Sulaiman Ataee, 25—also stabbed and seriously injured five other people, including 59-year-old activist Michael Stürzenberger, who was scheduled to speak at the May 31st anti-Islamism event. 

Stürzenberger is still being treated for and recovering from his injuries. 

On Wednesday, he posted on X:

Now surgery on the tooth root that was severed by the Afghan’s knife. 2 weeks ago knee surgery because of swollen bursa caused by one of the 7 knife stabs. Titanium staples in the jaw will be removed in November.

Sulaiman Ataee arrived in Germany as a 14-year-old but because of his young age, he was not deported after his asylum application was rejected. After he married a German national, he was given a residence permit. Neighbors said “he used to be normal” but that his appearance and demeanor had changed over time—he had grown a beard and had “suddenly become more reserved—and aggressive.” 

According to the media, Ataee had been radicalized and shared propaganda for the Islamic State on YouTube. At the time of the attacks, he was reportedly unemployed and receiving government benefits.  

Stürzerberger, a prominent activist with the anti-Islamization, anti-jihad group Bürgerbewegung Pax Europa (BPE), said in a statement on Facebook that it was unclear to him “how this Afghan Muslim Sulaiman Ataee could develop such a fanatic will to annihilate against us”:

The BPE has always differentiated, factually grounded and factually criticized Political Islam. We have declared time and time again that we have nothing against peaceful, democratically sound and modern minded Muslims. A spiritual Islam that doesn’t want to overpower all people with Sharia and doesn’t claim sole secular power is completely fine.

We need to get there, and that should be the biggest social challenge we will face in the coming decades. This can be best achieved in cooperation with modern-minded Muslims and Islamic associations who value life in a democratic and free society as much as we do.

Ataee, who was shot by police and initially reported dead, remained in an induced coma in a hospital in Mannheim for three weeks after the attack. Upon regaining consciousness, he was reportedly “very rude” to hospital staff and had no regrets about the attacks. 

The German government completely stopped deportations to Afghanistan after the Taliban retook power of the country in 2021. The Mannheim attacks led to criticism of this policy, with even Interior Minister Nancy Faeser saying “people who pose a potential threat to Germany’s security must be deported quickly.”

Ironically, the Islamist attacker had not been on the radar of law enforcement, while Stürzenberger had been monitored by Bavarias’s intelligence agency because of his engagement in the anti-Islamization movement.

https://europeanconservative.com/articles/news/two-months-after-mannheim-stabbings-survivors-are-still-recovering/

Sectarian Islamic politics – the future of the Western world?

by Giulio Meotti

Looking at England today, Paul Verlaine would rewrite: “Je suis l’Empire à la fin de la décadence”.

The great Jewish historian David Abulafia writes in The Telegraph that the “survival of the United Kingdom as a beacon of freedom” is at risk. The warning of one of the leading experts on the Middle Ages should not go unnoticed.

After 14 years of Conservative flop, Labour’s long flop begins.

Keir Starmer, the new prime minister, lost many sitting Labor MPs and potential cabinet ministers to “pro-Gaza independents”: Shockat Adam (Leicester), Adnan Hussain (Blackburn) and Iqbal Hussain Mohamed (Dewsbury). We are witnessing the emergence of an explicitly Islamic internal politics, with members elected on explicitly Islamic lists. The pro-Hamas are now the sixth largest political bloc in Parliament.

In the new Parliament, a considerable number of MPs will sit at the behest of a particular ethnic or religious community and will live to serve the perceived interest of those same communities.

In Birmingham, Labour’s shadow justice minister, Muslim Shabana Mahmood, rejected a challenge from Akhmed Yakoob, a pro-Gaza independence activist. “It is never acceptable to deny someone their faith, to brand them as an infidel,” said Shabana. “I know what a Muslim looks like. A Muslim looks like me. I know what Muslim values ​​are. Muslim values ​​are mine.”

Earlier, a video appeared on social media in which Yakoob claimed that British Muslims would “feel the wrath of Allah” if they invited Labor politicians into their homes or posed for a photo with them.

This is where England ends up, with a left-wing Islamic politician having to fight for a seat against an Islamic independence activist.

In the days before the elections, Angela Rayner, “the red queen of Labour”, number two in Starmer’s party and new deputy PM, went to Muslims to ask for their vote. Indeed, she does not ask: she implores. Only males in qamis, the typical Pakistani dress. “I know people are angry about what’s happening in the Middle East,” Angela told them. “If my resignation as MP now led to a ceasefire, I would do it. I would do it”.

The future is now!

Ayaan Hirsi Ali explained that Labor will introduce a law to protect Islam from criticism. “Under pressure from the Islamic lobby, which is growing in power, the new Labor government contemplates introducing legislation that would irreversibly damage free speech and stifle any ability to criticize radical Islam.”

After Brexit, England under the fake Conservatives gave up the Polish plumber and the Romanian carpenter to have absolutely ridiculous non-European immigration numbers. So ridiculous that even Labor pretended to want to do something about it.

Let’s look at the three cities where Islamic parliamentarians won: Leicester, Blackburn and Dewsbury.

“In Leicester everyone is a minority”, headlined The Guardian, rejoicing in “the end of the city’s white and Christian majority”. Christianity replaced by Islam: “In Leicester, a Deobandi mosque, built in 2000, overlooks the Edwardian church of St Philip, begun in 1909. The church congregation is 30 strong, a mix of white, Indian and African; the mosque across the street holds 500 people.”

The Independent announced in triumphalist tones: “Leicester, the first city where whites are a minority”. The city has Islamized so rapidly that today the Muslim population is 20 percent (in 2001 Muslims were 11 percent). Today, Islam is the majority among children in the city.

In Blackburn there are more than 40 mosques and a quarter of the population is already Muslim, as well as areas that are 95 per cent made up of ethnic minorities.

And Dewsbury? To write “Among the mosques”, Ed Husain visits a mosque in Dewsbury: “There is a ‘Sharia department’ in the mosque which deals with divorces and marriages. The mosque was a church…”.

New posters appeared at London bus stops this week: “Allah”. And invitations to donate zakat in mosques.

This will be what we will see coming from the country that was, for a long time, a beacon of freedom and dignity, the country that alone called other Europeans to fight on the seas, in the air and on the beaches.

Sectarian Islamic politics – the future of the Western world? | Israel National News – Arutz Sheva

‘Truly humiliating moment’: Three drag queens help carry Olympic torch to Paris

Nosta Lgia

In what one observer described as a “truly humiliating moment for the Olympics,” three drag queens have been among the 10,000 torch bearers carrying the Olympic flame through France as it made its way to the 2024 Paris Games.

The men who dress and portray themselves as women — Nicky Doll, Miss Martini, and Minima Gesté — were invited by authorities to participate in the marathon relay that originated months ago in Olympia, Greece.

When it was announced in May that drag queen Gesté, 33, had been selected, far-right politician Marion Marechal said Gesté was responsible for “particularly vulgar” and “hyper-sexualized performances,” according to an AFP report.

“I don’t think that this is a good way of representing France to the world,” Marechal told the TF1 channel on Thursday, according to AFP.

“It’s a truly humiliating moment for the Olympics, for the organizing committee that let this happen and for the entire 2024 Paris Games,” Outkick’s Ian Miller noted.

“What possible justification can there be for giving a drag queen the honor of carrying the Olympic Torch?” Miller asked. “Just as the Los Angeles Dodgers humiliated their storied franchise history by honoring an extremist group of anti-Catholic drag nuns, this is a humiliation for the Olympics as an event.”

“It’s offensive, and frankly inexcusable,” Miller said. “Which is probably exactly why those involved encouraged it. To show that they’re in charge, and you have to live under their rules. No matter how embarrassing those rules are.”

In a Wednesday post on X, Libs of TikTok simply pointed out that “Everything woke turns to sh*t.”

Socialist Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo seized the opportunity to portray Gesté as a victim, saying he was the target of “homophobic and transphobic insults.”

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/truly-humiliating-moment-three-drag-queens-help-carry-olympic-torch-to-paris/?utm_source=featured-news&utm_campaign=usa

The most criminal migrant in Germany? One asylum seeker terrorizes small town

Wikimedia Commons, NatiSythen, CC-BY-SA-3.0

Even as German authorities shut down press outlets critical of mass immigration, the country has never seen so much crime from foreigners, with the share of foreign crime hitting a record high in 2023. To exemplify this trend, the case of the small town of Apolda in the eastern German state of Thuringia highlights one of the most extreme cases in the entire country. There, a Moroccan asylum seeker has been terrorizing the small town for nearly 10 years, with local authorities seemingly powerless to stop the mayhem.

The 42-year-old Moroccan migrant has had his asylum application rejected numerous times and despite committing crimes nearly non-stop, attempts to deport him have been unsuccessful, as the Moroccan government refuses to accept him back despite German authorities confirming his identity. Born in Casablanca in 1982, the man is known to Interpol for various crimes, but Moroccan authorities deny that he is their citizen.

The man’s asylum application was already rejected in 2014 since he entered Germany through Italy. At that time, he was supposed to be sent back to Italy under Dublin rules, which posited that migrants are supposed to remain in the first country they register; however, for millions of migrants, these rules were completely disregarded. In April 2015, authorities finally managed to send him back to Italy, but just four days later, he made his way back to Germany despite having a five-year residence and entry ban.

Charged with 46 crimes

Upon his return, he was arrested numerous times for resisting arrest, assault, property damage, and threats. The police launched 46 cases against him, and in 2016, a regional court in Erfurt sentenced him to 23 months in prison.

While imprisoned, he submitted an unsuccessful asylum application, and in 2017, authorities issued an order that he must be “forcibly required to leave the country.” However, upon being released from prison in July 2017, he attacked yet another police officer in his newly assigned asylum center and was arrested for a drug offense.

Charged with 50 more crimes

It gets much worse from there. In April 2019, he was imprisoned once again after committing 50 additional crimes, including physical assault, theft, trespassing, multiple fraudulent benefits claims, resisting arrest, and property damage. At this point, he had close to over 100 crimes since arriving in Germany, but that would be far from the end of his criminal record.

At this point, even other migrants were growing tired of the Moroccan, and residents in his own asylum accommodation began a petition to have the man removed, which was signed by over 146 residents and employees in November 2019.

Once the man was released from prison, he immediately began committing more crimes in the autumn of 2022 and was arrested in July 2023 for bodily harm, for which he was imprisoned again until May of this year. Upon returning from prison to his asylum accommodation, he threatened the residents, insulted police officers, and the next day, demanded cash from the district office in an “extremely aggressive” manner and then spat at officers.

No help from above

Local authorities have gotten so desperate that they are appealing to state Prime Minister Bodo Ramelow for help, with district administrator Christiane Schmidt-Rose (CDU) of the Thuringian district of Weimarer Land and Apolda Mayor Olaf Müller (CDU) writing a letter to Ramelow, where they detailed the extreme nature of the asylum seeker’s crimes.

“These recent incidents have once again made it clear that the offender in question cannot be controlled,” reads the letter. The letter notes that most recently, at the end of July, after being released from prison, he triggered four police operations within 24 hours and officers had to arrest him using force after the fourth operation.

Notably, the officials who wrote the letter are not asking that the man be deported, which is not possible in Germany due to various laws, including Morocco’s refusal to take the man back. Instead, they want to pass the problem on to someone else. They are requesting concrete action from the state prime minister and that the offender to be placed in another district or city.

https://rmx.news/article/the-most-criminal-migrant-in-germany-one-asylum-seeker-terrorizes-small-town/

No Matter How Often Leftism Fails, True Believers Never Face The Consequences

By Jonathan Gault

Perhaps the most significant factor contributing to the Soviet Union’s collapse was a resolute commitment to the infallibility of socialist ideology, coupled with its continued application long after its obvious failure. The failure to learn history and, by extension, internalize the lessons from this dark period is what enables our modern-day Marxists (whom we refer to as “leftists” or “progressives”) to believe that they can somehow avoid the consequences of the policies they promote.

Modern political history shows that these same people almost always avoid any personal liability for the destruction that they’ve wrought. In the Soviet countries, this mindset prevailed until the collapse of that abominable regime in 1991, but not before oppressing, enslaving, and murdering millions.

Unfortunately, this worldview persists even today. Adherence to ideological purity is valued above empirical evidence and objective truth, and is particularly prevalent among miseducated Western leftists who “identify as secular,” whereas those of us who believe in G-d are labeled “superstitious.” These are the archetypical “godless commies.” By traditional standards, they display appalling behavior. Fyodor Dostoyevsky, who had experience with this, once said, “If there is no G-d, everything is permitted.”

Image: The fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 (unaltered usage allowed under German law), which taught Marxists nothing.

These ideologues consider their worldview incontrovertible, making them intolerant of opposing viewpoints, which they consider “lies.” As we witnessed after the June 27 debate, opposing viewpoints are also regarded as inherently sinister. The debate moderators, CNN’s Jake Tapper (“Fake Yapper”) and Dana Bash (the ex-wife of former Obama CIA Chief of Staff and DoD Chief of Staff Jeremy Bash), are two such godless commies, with their own histories of intolerance while feigning virtue.

Such cadres concentrate (and flourish) in institutions such as academia, government, non-profit/activist organizations, think tanks (producing few original ideas), and political and other organizations where ideological purity has replaced merit as the basis for career advancement. Here, ideas need not be empirically proven to receive perpetual funding. This explains how Democrats often “fail upward,” also known as “The Peter Principle” (people rise to the level of their incompetence). Biden, Harris, Blinken, and Jake Sullivan are prime examples.

Thomas Sowell said that “the most fundamental fact about the ideas of the political left is that they do not work.” Yet we still find ourselves struggling with ideologues promoting impracticable ideas/policies provably tested over decades as destructive and morally evil. Unlimited empirical evidence and a well-documented 74-year Soviet period resulting in misery, deprivation, and failure don’t dissuade them. Millions remain yoked to this ideology. It’s simultaneously perplexing while perversely impressive, speaking to the religious nature of the ideology and the effectiveness of the indoctrination.

They hubristically believe that men and the governments they create can somehow bypass, bend, or suspend the laws of nature, avoiding failure. Men can become women and control the weather. It’s as if they believe in a magical black hole that can be perfectly timed and exploited by Marxist demigods so capable that they can identify the precise moments in a time continuum enabling them to successfully implement policies that have failed repeatedly and miserably whenever they’ve previously been attempted.

If that isn’t bizarre enough, there is the self-delusion that their intentions are uniquely virtuous and their self-anointed “experts” (whose status never requires validation) uniquely capable.

When these policies, judged on merit (outcome, not intention), inevitably fail, the ideologues will hypocritically claim success or shamelessly place blame on others for not letting them “go far enough” or “implement it correctly.”

Ultimately, when they realize that the immutable natural laws they have attempted to bypass apply even to them, and they become trapped by the consequences of their actions, they invariably demand more government intervention and additional resources (their favorite), or, they just leave the mess they created for others to sort out. All the while, they insist that their intentions were good and their “hearts were in the right place.”

This occurs when actions have no consequences. Thomas Sowell again: “It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong.”

As we’ve seen, elections have consequences, but so should actions, particularly for those entrusted with power. Those promoting a collectivist, immoral, anti-human, anti-religion ideology, ignoring the laws of nature, giving money to terrorists and drug cartels, encouraging rioting, bailing criminals out rather than prosecuting them, and calling parents protesting sexual deviance “domestic terrorists” are trying to overthrow the system. Where I come from, we call that TREASON, which has serious consequences.

Progressive’s adamantine commitment to their ideology’s infallibility is what enables them to believe that they can avoid their policies’ consequences. It is a Soviet mindset, replacing religion, that prevailed in the Eastern bloc until it began to collapse in 1989, and that’s been perpetuated in underdeveloped places in Asia, Latin America, and Africa. In the Muslim world, it fused with Islam in Algeria, Egypt, and Iraq. This is an integral part of what makes (and keeps) such places underdeveloped.

Break free, as Czechia, Hungary, Chile, the UAE, and Taiwan did, and you might find your country developing. Become consumed by it, and your country will likely be destroyed (e.g., Argentina, Greece, Portugal, South Africa, and Rhodesia/Zimbabwe).

Although leftism has not claimed even one success (even many Israeli kibbutzim have failed, proving that such social experiments flop even on a small scale), this creepy ideology retains its staying power. Empirical evidence is irrelevant.

Ultimately, leftism is a faith, allowing its proponents to believe there must be loopholes in the laws of human nature and causality that apply to a progressive society, allowing its members to “have their cake and eat it, too.” Their well-documented history of misery, deprivation, and abject failure is no bar to their promoting an anti-human, anti-freedom ideology in the belief that somehow, once implemented, they will magically be spared its consequences.

The most vexing aspect of this manifestly self-destructive behavior is the false perception that progressive intentions are somehow more virtuous. When their policies—which must inevitably be judged on their merits (outcomes, not intentions)—consistently fail, progressives will either hypocritically claim success or shamelessly place blame on rivals for “not letting you go far enough.”

Ultimately—and this is something progressives willfully refuse to acknowledge—when the immutable natural laws you refuse to consider still make themselves known, you become trapped by the consequences of your actions. People who are not cultists will look at their failures and learn from them. The left’s cultists never learn, though. They just double down on their failures, even as the American experience collapses in ruins around them.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/07/no_matter_how_often_leftism_fails_true_believers_never_face_the_consequences.html