Negotiations to finalize both the proposed Amendments to the International Health Regulations and the new Pandemic Treaty stalled on Friday May 24, leading many to claim that the treaty was “dead.” However, the Director General of the World Health Organization, Dr. Tedros Ghebreyesus, immediately stated that the negotiations would continue.
Several nations, including the United States, have proposed a Resolution, the effect of which would be that the WHO will continue to negotiate the proposed Amendments to the IHR throughout this week, to be voted upon by the end of the week.
A press release from the WHO makes clear that it wants to finalize the Amendments to the International Health Regulations by June 1.
Reggie Littlejohn, Co-Founder of the Sovereignty Coalition and President of Anti-Globalist International, traveled to Geneva for the World Health Assembly. She stated:
Negotiating Amendments to the International Health Regulations during the meeting of the World Health Assembly, to be disclosed the day of the vote on those amendments, is a flagrant violation of IHR Article 55, which requires that all proposed amendments be circulated in their final form four months in advance of a vote. The intent of Article 55 is to give national governments and civil society time to review the proposed changes and analyze their impact. The fact that the World Health Organization is willing to violate its own laws and regulations so flagrantly indicates their disdain for the rule of law. If they are willing to toss even their own procedural safeguards out the window, why should we expect them to honor the laws of our nation?
Littlejohn continued: “Beyond this, we have no idea what they are planning to add to the IHRs, as they are negotiating them this week in a black box. Will they try to inject problematic provisions of the Pandemic Treaty – provisions that could damage our national sovereignty and personal medical freedom – into the IHRs, so that they can get them passed by consent rather than putting them to the rigorous 2/3 majority vote required by a treaty? We must do everything we can to stop this vote on Friday!”
After deliberating for 9 hours, a jury of Trump’s Manhattan Trump-hating peers found him guilty of a crime that doesn’t exist anywhere in the legal codes, invented by a DA who had promised not to prosecute armed robberies but chose instead to prosecute a non-disclosure agreement.
On Wednesday, while the jury spent a whole four and a half hours deliberating how quickly they would convict former President Trump of all the charges, a 15-year-old boy and a 15-year-old girl were shot in the city. Two hours later, a man was shot while sitting in his car in Manhattan.
No one in the Manhattan DA’s office cared since it was too busy trying to nail Trump over a payment that happened eight years ago and which did not involve any actual illegalities.
None of the 8 murders, 54 rapes, 204 burglaries, 303 robberies, 535 felony assaults or 891 grand larcenies that occurred in New York City the same week as the Trump trial garnered a fraction of the attention. That was bad news for the 26 shooting victims, include the 15-year-old girl, and the 54 rape victims, not to mention the victims in the other 110 sex crime victims that all had to take a backseat to a Democrat kangaroo court cutting a 2024 presidential election ad.
Toward the end, the Biden campaign even dispatched an angry and belligerent Robert De Niro (Dirty Grandpa, Little Fockers) in a COVID mask to yell something about Trump outside the courthouse. The prosecution’s case in the courthouse was little more coherent than that, but it didn’t matter with a jury that would have found Trump guilty sooner if it wasn’t for the free food.
After waiting right before the weekend, the jury announced that he was guilty. Of something.
Neither the prosecution, nor Judge Merchan, a partisan activist barely more able to control himself than De Niro, who had gotten into shouting matches with lawyers and even witnesses, let alone the jury could quantify what the actual crime was involved in covering up something that was not itself a crime. The prosecution had failed to prove that Trump had been involved in the cover-up, but even more fundamentally had failed to prove that anything had happened or that having sex with Stormy Daniels was a crime. Its only witness to the contrary was a self-confessed liar and thief who should not have even been allowed to testify against Trump.
The trial that cost taxpayers countless millions as part of a federal-city investigation which began with an illegal FBI raid on Trump’s corrupt lawyer back in 2018 and a Manhattan investigation that ran for 4 years, may have been the longest case of election interference on record. Bogged down by such minor problems as the lack of an actual criminal charge, DA Alvin Bragg, who had been personally disavowed to me even by a Soros representative, claimed that giving a slattern money counted as falsifying business records because it’s not a legal expense.
Contrast the whole thing to Hunter Biden drawing on a shared bank account with Joe Biden to pay hookers and having the secret service show up to politely ask him to be more discreet.
When Hillary Clinton and the DNC paid a British ex-spy to falsely claim that Trump had been cavorting with urinating prostitutes in Moscow through a lawyer, the FBI didn’t raid his offices, and Hillary wasn’t charged with falsifying business records, the whole thing was settled with a low six-figure fine through the FEC. With Democrats, the New York legal establishment dismisses crimes while with Republicans, it invents them just in time for the next election.
The illegal Trump jury verdict came a day after a surprisingly unified Supreme Court led by Justice Sonia Sotomayor rebuked New York State for targeting the NRA for political reasons. In the middle of a runaway crime wave, New York’s Attorney General Letita James and Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg have spent years and massive amounts of resources pursuing conservatives for purely political reasons during a period where over 1,000 people were murdered in New York.
But what’s a thousand corpses when Democrat prosecutors can count coup on Trump?
Neither of the New York cases (or any of the state or federal cases.) were ever about the alleged crimes, but about Trump. The only actual crime in these cases was being Trump and the only actual conviction was for being Trump. More broadly, the investigations, trials and verdicts only exist as a partisan campaign to illegally influence the 2024 presidential election.
The guilty verdict does not make Trump a felon, it makes Manhattan a banana republic.
And the Trump trials have exposed the banana republics across the country where lawless leftists have hijacked the legal system and corrupted the political process to suppress political dissent. Not only have they decriminalized crime and unleashed criminals who roam the streets robbing, mugging and killing at will, but they have criminalized any opposition to their regimes.
The two are not contradictory but complementary. The American public is miserable. No amount of media lies has shaken the reality of going to a supermarket and seeing that the prices have doubled. And all the gaslighting about crime statistics can’t confuse the awareness that street crime has become an everyday occurrence by thugs who show no fear of cops or courts.
Rather than abandon their destructive policies, leftists silence critics and lock up opponents.
New crimes, such as “election denial”, “misinformation” and “doing donuts over the letters BLM on a street” dot the system. Shoot two teenagers in Manhattan and it’s no big deal, but do business in Manhattan while being a Republican and the system will not rest until it gets you.
The Trump trial was not a trial, it was a politically motivated lynching with no legal basis.
The goal is to smear an opposing political candidate, drain his bank accounts and cut nonstop election ads on every cable news network through hoax trials funded by taxpayers. It’s no coincidence that Trump’s election calendar has been packed by an equally busy court calendar.
Unable to win an election at the polls, the Democrats are trying to win an election in the courts.
The kangaroos are dancing. The Lincoln Project is celebrating. Joe Biden just put out a fundraising ad saying “let’s finish the job.”
President Trump was convicted on all 34 counts of .. something, a bookkeeping issue turned into a felony, with whatever the underlying crimes the jury picked (Trump wasn’t told) for a conviction, quite contrary to the Supreme Court’s 1999 Richardson ruling, that the jury must be unanimous as to the underlying crime. Justice Juan Merchan said otherwise and that was what the jury was told.
So now the left is happy, dancing, Joe Biden trying to make money off it, and Merchan, who presided over this kangaroo court in New York, setting the sentencing for Trump to July 11, just before the GOP convention. Maybe his Democrat political operative daughter recommended that one.
The justice, who bitterly complained about not being able to send one of President Trump’s executives to prison for a longer sentence that he did, again, over a bookkeeping issue, is sure to send President Trump to Riker’s Island, making himself a hero to the left, which will no doubt ensure that he gets richer.
Which seems about par, given the dishonesty of this entire case, one that makes the U.S. a global laughingstock on the world stage and will undoubtedly empower dictators to do the same to their political opponents.
So much was utterly wrong with this case.
As AT’s Andrea Widburg has noted upon the news:
The case violated virtually every aspect of the Sixth Amendment. The top New York court or the United States Supreme Court had better step in or this will not go well for America.
…and…
The case is void ab initio — Trump was not “informed of the nature and cause of the accusation” nor was he allowed to have an important witness in his favor, when the judge shut down testimony from someone who could have explained the campaign finance law. Not only did Merchan shut that down, he still let the prosecution make the campaign finance argument.
Presumably he will overturn it on appeal, but Supreme Court justices have been subject to unprecedented attacks from the left in these past weeks, making it possible that some (not the strictest constitutionalists being attacked, but the soggy middle ones) may be intimidated to go along with Merchan instead and too bad about what the voters want. They have displayed a lot of cowardice already. But I don’t want to get excessively pessimistic.
There were other problems, too, with this case — Trump was tried by a jury not of his peers but of his political enemies, all Democrats, one a teachers union member, none sequestered, all voting against Trump on election day. Worse still, Trump was tried by a judge with profound conflicts of interest, his daughter a Democrat political operative, himself a Biden donor, giving an illegal donation for which he was only “cautioned” by the New York bar authorities instead of disqualified. Worse still is the oddity of his trying multiple Trump allies in the past, always handing out the maximum sentence he could get away with. That’s too much coincidence.
But this garbage court case is unlikely to affect the election, as a Fox News poll out out today by Fox suggests:
A new national poll is the latest to indicate that regardless of whether former President Trump is found guilty or acquitted in his criminal trial, the verdict will not have a large impact on voters’ perceptions in his 2024 election rematch with President Biden.
Two-thirds of registered voters nationwide questioned in a NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist National Poll released on Thursday said a guilty verdict in the trial would make no difference to their vote in the presidential election. Seventeen percent said a conviction of Trump would make them less likely to vote for him and 15% said they’d be more inclined to support the former president at the ballot box.
If Trump is acquitted, three-quarters of those surveyed said it wouldn’t impact their vote. Fourteen percent said a not guilty verdict would make them more likely to back Trump, and 9% said they’d be less likely to vote for the former president.
All it does it show us how vile and evil the left is, with absolutely no scruples of any kind as they seek to re-elect floundering Joe Biden and better still, knock Trump from the race by any means necessary. It’s banana republic stuff and a sign of just how corrupted our court system has gotten. The only way out now is to re-elect President Trump. The campaign lines are now reportedly jammed with donors.
The New York City jury reached a verdict in Alvin Bragg and Judge Juan Merchan’s lawfare case against President Donald Trump late on Thursday afternoon.
The verdict was announced after 5 PM ET.
President Trump was tried by a jury in a city that voted 87% for Joe Biden. The jury members all admitted to reading The New York Times and watching MSNBC for their news.
The verdict is in…
TRUMP WAS GUILTY ON ALL COUNTY! 34 Guilty Charges!
In a shocking twist that defies the principles of American jurisprudence, Judge Merchan instructed the jurors that they do not need to reach a unanimous decision on the specific “unlawful means” that Trump is accused of in the case. They just have to sense that he is guilty. This goes against all common law in US history.
Instead, the jury was given the liberty to select from three main options, effectively turning the process into a choose-your-own-adventure game of legal implications.
Violations of federal election law (which no one in that courtroom is familiar with, and the judge specifically prevents Brad Smith from testifying about);
The falsification of business records; and
Tax violations
President Trump is being tried by a jury in a city that voted 87% for Joe Biden. The jury members all admitted to reading The New York Times and watching MSNBC for their news.
A women-only fitness center in Erlangen, Bavaria, has been ordered by the government to pay compensation to a trans-identified male after the facility’s owner denied him permission to use the women’s showers.
Doris Lange, who has been the owner of the Lady’s First fitness studio for over three decades, received a notice from Ferda Ataman, the Independent Federal Commissioner for Anti-Discrimination, recommending “appropriate compensation” in the form of €1000 to a trans-identified male for the “personal injury suffered” at being rejected from using the women’s showers.
The incident, first reported by NIUS, occurred at the end of March, when a trans-identified male requested the use of the facilities, including the women-only showers. According to staff, the man’s identification designated him as male, and no official paperwork stating a legal sex change was presented.
However, the fitness center scheduled a training session with the man, who continued to insist on using the women’s showers. As a “compromise,” he offered to wear swimming trunks in the area where women would be present in the nude.
When the fitness center’s owner became aware of the situation, Lange instructed staff to prepare a courteous rejection of the man’s request over the phone.
The trans-identified male then sent Lady’s First fitness an email requesting continued access to the facility while promising to avoid using the showers altogether. His offer was denied.
Speaking to NIUS, Lange noted that a significant number of her clients were Muslim females who required a sex-exclusive place to train away from males.
“With all understanding for the lady’s situation, we only have one large training room, one changing room and one shower. 20% of our members are Muslim women. The women come to our studio specifically to train in an environment that is safe for them,” Lange said.
“It looks to my female customers as if I’m letting a man train there – at least as long as this lady is still equipped with male sexual organs.”
On May 16, Lange received a letter from the Federal Anti-Discrimination Agency (ADS), headed by the Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, instructing her to pay the man compensation.
“The facts of the case could be a violation of the AGG (General Equal Treatment Act, editor’s note) in the form of direct discrimination on the grounds of gender,” reads the letter from Ferda Ataman’s office, the Federal Anti-Discrimination Agency (ADS), to Lange.
“The AGG characteristic of gender also protects trans* women. This applies regardless of whether the person concerned has already officially undergone a change of name and civil status and/or gender reassignment measures.”
It continues: “With this in mind, we would ask you to consider what possibilities and starting points exist for an amicable solution to the matter on your part. For example, we would suggest that you pay … appropriate compensation in the amount of 1000 euros for the personal injury she has suffered.”
Dr. Christoph Franke, who is acting as legal representative for Lady’s First fitness, expressed his shock to NIUS that the Federal Anti-Discrimination Commissioner had ordered the fine.
“This is a remarkable case. The Federal Anti-Discrimination Agency is directly integrated into the Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth and suggests through the letter that our client is under a sovereign obligation to pay compensation. Not only is this not the task of the Anti-Discrimination Agency, it is also arrogating to itself the powers of the judiciary.”
As previously reported by Reduxx, Holstein was the first trans-identified male to be approved by the Bavarian Football Association (BFA) to play in a women’s football league.
After being rejected from the fitness club, Holstein submitted a 1-star review of the club in which he complained about being disrespected.
“As a trans woman in particular, I had high hopes for the studio, as they are a studio for women and I therefore hoped to have a respectful atmosphere,” wrote Holstein in his review.
“So I arranged a trial training session and my first impression was very positive. But then I was told on the phone that they couldn’t accept me. When asked what the exact reasons were, there was only an unfriendly answer. Apparently they categorically reject women who don’t fit the concept. I find it very unfortunate,” he continued. “Absolutely not recommended for trans people and their allies.”
I can’t tell people who have a different, non-binary gender identity and want to play football: You were unlucky,” Labahn said. Though there are only male and female categories in German football, the BFA has a “case-by-case” inclusion policy, so Labahn explains she had to argue for Holstein’s right to participate in the women’s league.
Labahn said that an opening had emerged in the club after a trans-identified female had decided to opt out due to the fact that testosterone was making her too strong to participate with the other women. Labahn then “turned the tables,” arguing that estrogen had caused Holstein to “lose” muscle mass and would have stripped him of a competitive advantage.
While Holstein won’t officially begin playing against opposing women’s teams until the August season, he has begun participating in training sessions, and is sharing the female locker room with the women and girls on the Effeltrich/Hetzles Football Syndicate.
As some players are underage, concerns were raised about Holstein exposing his penis during shower times — an issue the coach attempted to address by providing Holstein a shower schedule.
The coach, Christian Wagner, is also preempting “transphobic” remarks from other players or spectators, and says that anyone who is discriminatory towards Holstein will be immediately banned from the arena.
Holstein reportedly began identifying as a woman after watching The Danish Girl in 2015. The film is based on the life story of Lili Elbe, a trans-identified male who died of complications after his body rejected a uterus implanted into him in 1931. Following the movie, Holstein says he was “touched extremely internally. I questioned what I really feel deep inside.” He then says he “discovered the woman” within himself.
In 2020, Holstein began hormone replacement therapy and laser hair removal. He is set to legally change his sex to “female” in September of this year.
The church of the Immaculée Conception parish in the Faubourg-Bonnefoy district of Toulouse was vandalised on Thursday May 30. Numerous objects were knocked over or broken. The Immaculée Conception church in the Faubourg Bonnefoy district of Toulouse was vandalised on Thursday May 30. The parish is located just a few metres from Rue du Faubourg Bonnefoy on Place du Chanoine Philippe Ravary. Several objects were knocked over and broken. A blue sheet was placed over the head of a statue of the Virgin Mary. Although the altar is inside bars, it was also damaged. The police are on the scene and investigations are ongoing. The diocese of Toulouse has filed a complaint and has not given France Bleu Occitanie permission to distribute the photos taken by our reporter.
Because a female jogger waved in a friendly manner, a train driver in Altußheim near Mannheim stopped his goods train to sexually harass the woman. It was an ‘incident that left even the most experienced investigators baffled’, according to an internal police report quoted by the news portal Nius. The Federal Police – responsible for crime at railway stations and on train lines – kept the case quiet.
‘At around 13:10, the 32-year-old was jogging along the railway tracks. She was travelling alone at the time, dressed in normal sportswear.’ Out of politeness and habit, she had waved to the passing train. The 41-year-old train driver ‘braked his engine to a standstill, got out and approached the woman’, the portal continues.
He then allegedly spoke to the woman in broken German and described her private parts as ‘beautiful’. Without much hesitation, he grabbed her crotch and buttocks. The jogger managed to break away and ran off – but the man caught up with her. He groped the 32-year-old again and kissed her breast area. She finally broke free and escaped.
The groper returned to his goods train and travelled on. The German citizen, who only spoke ‘broken German’, was arrested at Düsseldorf-Rath station. The Federal Police and Deutsche Bahn kept further details under wraps. The internal report is labelled ‘not for press release’.
A Syrian migrant who broke into an elderly woman’s apartment and sexually assaulted a 78-year-old woman was immediately arrested and then released, only to rape a 23-year-old woman the next day, according to police. The man is now on trial for the crimes.
The 25-year-old migrant, Ayman Al-K, from Syria, was arrested after the elderly woman was able to fight him off until help could arrive, according to Berliner Zeitung. He is said to have entered the elderly woman’s apartment on the first floor, but when the woman saw him, she screamed for help. The man allegedly placed her in a headlock and covered her nose and mouth. Neighbors rushed in and intervened, and the man was arrested close to the scene.
However, the Berlin public prosecutor refused to hold him in custody, releasing him nearly immediately. The public prosecutor claimed that the “identification had not been sufficiently secured,” according to the justification provided after the man was arrested for rape the following day.
Ayman Al-K had been sent back to his asylum accommodation at Ostpreußendamm, where he raped a 23-year-old woman, who was unsuccessful at defending herself, and bit her hard on the neck. He was then arrested and charged.
The man is facing 10 days of trial for bodily harm, breaking and entering, sexual assault, and rape. His verdict will be issued Aug. 12.
The shocking case highlights the tremendous amount of rape and sexual assault perpetrated by Germany’s foreign population, and the German authorities’ unwillingness to provide even the most basic protections for the country’s women. According to new data released by the Federal Interior Ministry, violent crime has reached record highs, with foreigners responsible for 41 percent of all crimes.
Gang rapes have reached a record high in the country. The Berlin police released statistics just this week showing that there were 111 gang rapes in 2023 and that 54 percent of all such crimes were perpetrated by foreigners.
Advocates of medically assisted suicide, known as MAID in Canada, have made a big deal about how “peaceful” the practice is, with patients dying humanely, surrounded by their loved ones, in a sea of tranquility.
“What this increase tells me is that Canada has paid the most attention to individual human rights and autonomy,” said Chantal Perrot, a physician and Maid provider. “An increase in deaths with Maid means to me that people are choosing to die with their loved ones around them. The last days, weeks or months of life can be horrific. Why would they want to go through that if they could have a peaceful death surrounded by their family and loved ones?”
Actually, that’s not what it is.
It’s getting now that the process is a torturous nightmare, the kind you wake up screaming from in your sleep, according to a report from Lifesite News:
While marketed and pushed under the guise of painless compassion, the method used to kill Canadians under the nation’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) euthanasia program may actually be akin to waterboarding.
During a May 6 episode of renowned anti-woke Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson’s podcast, Sheren, a combat veteran and artillery gunner in the Canadian military, revealed that the drugs used in MAiD essentially waterboard a person to death.
“What I found out yesterday that really bothered me was the mechanism of the actual procedure,” she began, comparing Canada’s current practices to those in Nazis Germany. “The reason people in Canada who are given MAiD seem peaceful is because they’re given a paralytic first so they’re completely paralyzed, then this drug is administered as one of the four and they start drowning to death.”
That’s a horrible way to go, paralyzed and drowning, over hours and hours, unable to call out for help. The researchers who inspected the bodies of those killed by medically induced suicide have reported water in the lungs of the victims, while the induced-death process extends over the course of hours, which is what happens during a drowning, except that drowning produced death much quicker.
“The MAID protocol very likely causes lung congestion in a similar fashion to that which has been shown in over 200 cases of lethal injection in the U.S.,” he said, referencing a Freedom of Information Act request containing the autopsies of around 300 Americans who were executed using the same drugs as Canada’s MAiD program
Yet even with this ugly reality, the Canadian government is still trying to expand it, among the mentally ill, fo one, as well as indoctrinate for it among young kids, making it normal, which it is getting to be. The Guardian notes that more than 4% of the population ends up euthanized:
The three medicines work like this: The first medicine makes the person feel very relaxed and fall asleep. They may yawn or snore or mumble.
The second medicine causes a “coma.” A coma looks like sleep but is much deeper than regular sleep. The person will not wake up or be bothered by noise or touch.
The third medicine makes the person’s lungs stop breathing then their heart stops beating. Because of the coma, the person does not notice this happening and it does not hurt. When their heart and lungs stop working, their body dies. It will not start working again. This often happens in just a few minutes, but sometimes (rarely) it can take hours.
And if the person asks to die, there is no changing their mind:
As much as other people may want to change their mind, the person who is choosing MAiD probably wishes just as strongly that they could change their illness or condition and how it is affecting their life. When someone decides to ask for MAiD, it is usually after thinking very carefully and having very hard feelings for a long time. They may feel that nothing will change their mind because there is nothing that can help their body or their suffering get better.
Oh how humane it sounds, except that it’s anything but.
One of the biggest problems with this bad idea is that there is no way out once a patient realizes the mistake he’s made. People who jump off buildings and bridges almost always try to break their falls with their hands and survivors have said they regretted their acts immediately.
While the Canadian government on its website says that patients can halt the process any time they wish in their own killing, the truth is, a patient under drugs causing paralysis cannot. The person just has to drown and drown while trying to scream, while the assisted suicide crowd above says it’s all so peaceful, a death with dignity.
That’s grotesque, and one can only hope that these revelations stop that self-destruction course Canada is now on with its assisted suicide encouragement.
So much for death with dignity. This practice has got to go.