A migrant male brutally beat a German train worker who was performing a ticket check and then severely humiliated his victim by urinating on her in front of several witnesses, only to escape the scene and attack a number of other women at a nearby supermarket. He remains on the run.
Witnesses at the train station at Graben-Neudorf in Karlsruhe, located in southern Germany, say a 35-year-old migrant attacked a 57-year-old rail employee when the worker tried to check his ticket. A police spokesperson said the suspect, who has a “North African” appearance, severely injured the train worker “by punching, kicking and choking” her.
The migrant then grabbed the woman’s head and pushed it against his crotch in an attempt to simulate oral sex. He then turned to the people on the train and demanded they shout, “Heil Hitler.” As a final act, he urinated on his victim in front of witnesses, according to German newspaper Bild.
The man fled the scene, while emergency services transported the woman to the hospital with severe injuries. The migrant walked into a nearby supermarket and proceeded to attack two other women, threw a plate at a saleswoman, and then hit a customer who was waiting to pay at a checkout counter.
He then walked into the supermarket parking lot armed with a broken bottle where he attacked a driver, stole his car keys, and fled in the victim’s gray VW T-Cross. While fleeing in the car, the man drove erratically, leading to several accidents.
Police continue to actively search for the suspect, who is considered armed and dangerous.
Public transportation workers face brutal assaults
As Remix News has reported in the past, migrants are responsible for a greatly disproportionate share of crime in Germany, and public workers on bus and rail transportation have often been the targets of attacks. It is especially dangerous for ticket controllers, who are often attacked for asking foreigners to pay for their tickets.
Last summer, a German train driver was brutally beaten by two Afghan males while bystanders filmed the incident.
Police data show that knife attacks at German train stations have doubled since 2019, largely due to mass immigration.
In 2022, two Nigerians beat a German train conductor unconscious when he asked them to clear away from the train door. A month before, a German ticket inspector was stabbed by a Syrian migrant who had refused to buy a ticket.
One Syrian vandal has racked up over €1 million worth of damage in his long criminal career, with the man accused of smashing the windshields of over 200 cars, robbing and injuring a pensioner, and setting fire to a bus. Last year, a German court revoked an arrest warrant applied for by the authorities, effectively allowing him to walk free.
A carnival in the Spanish city of Torrevieja has been accused of promoting pedophilia and over-sexualizing children as a group of young girls were dressed up like “prostitutes” while carrying LGBT rainbow flags.
Footage that has emerged of the “Grand Carnival Parade,” sparking heavy criticism throughout the country over a dancing troupe featuring young girls in high heels, stockings, nipple covers, and rainbow flags.
Poland Castellanos, the president of the Spanish Christian Lawyers Foundation, said, “It is reprehensible and falls into the category of corruption of minors. “
The Spanish Christian Lawyers Foundation plans to take legal action against the parade.
Tanweer Ikram (pictured) is facing calls to be investigated for a conflict of interest after he liked a LinkedIn post calling for a ‘free Palestine
A judge who let three women who wore paraglider images at a pro-Palestine march walk free after being found guilty of terror offences is believed to have liked an anti-Israel social media post.
Deputy Senior District Judge Tanweer Ikram is understood to have ‘liked’ a LinkedIn post which called for a “free Palestine” and spoke of “Israeli terrorist[s]” three weeks ago.
Mr Ikram has faced widespread criticism after saying he had “decided not to punish” the three women who displayed paraglider images, despite them each being convicted of a terrorist offence.
Judicial guidance says that those with strong views on a topic should consider whether it is appropriate to hear a case.
Heba Alhayek, 29, Pauline Ankunda, 26, and Noimutu Olayinka Taiwo, 27, were each handed a 12-month conditional discharge.
The post liked by Mr Ikram read: “Free Free Palestine. To the Israeli terrorist both in the United Kingdom, the United States, and of course Israel you can run, you can bomb but you cannot hide — justice will be coming for you.”
Speaking on behalf of the judge, a Judicial Office spokesperson told LBC he said: “I didn’t know I had liked it. If I did, it was a genuine mistake.”
It comes after Mr Ikram previously jailed a police officer who sent several racist memes in a WhatsApp group chat.
The judge is facing criticism after ‘liking’ a post on LinkedIn. Picture: Social media
Giving his verdict on Tuesday, Mr Ikram said: “Each of you stands convicted of a terrorist offence
“There is nothing to suggest the police of their own volition were going to take any action.
“You’ve not hidden the fact you were carrying these images.
“You crossed the line, but it would have been fair to say that emotions ran very high on this issue.
“Your lesson has been well learnt. I do not find you were seeking to show any support for Hamas.”
Prosecutors said the women had used the imagery to “celebrate” the Hamas terrorists’ tactics in the attack on Israel.
Brett Weaver told the court: “The displaying of these images could be viewed as celebrating the use of the paragliders’ tactic.
“They had them on display for a significant period of time. Each of them would have been able to see what the others were doing.”
Mark Summers KC, representing Alhayek and Ankunda, said the women were actually displaying a “cartoon parachute” used as a “symbol of peace”.
Sadiq Khan made an excruciating gaffe in an interview this morning, saying the Labour Party is “proud to be antisemitic” Sky
Sadiq Khan made an excruciating gaffe in an interview this morning, saying the Labour Party is “proud to be antisemitic”.
Speaking about allegations of antisemitism in the party, Khan said: “As far as I’m concerned that sort of language isn’t acceptable. And it certainly isn’t acceptable in a party like mine that is proud to be both anti-racist but also antisemitic.”
As the presenter moved away from the Mayor, he attempted to correct himself, adding: “I beg your pardon, tackling anti-semitism”.
Rochdale by-election candidate Azhar Ali was accused of suggesting that Israel deliberately relaxed its security in October, ahead of the Hamas attacks, following warnings of an imminent threat.
While Graham Jones, the former Labour MP for Hyndburn who lost his seat in 2019 and is seeking to stand again, is alleged to have said that UK citizens who volunteer to fight for the Israeli Defence Forces “should be locked up” and that it was “illegal” for them to fight for Israel, according to the website Guido Fawkes.
Jones, a former Labour MP who lost his seat in 2019, was seeking to stand again for the Labour Party. He was administratively suspended from the party last night, pending investigation, GB News understands. The former MP was called in for an interview last night.
Sources told Guido Fawkes that he allegedly claimed UK citizens who volunteer to fight for the Israeli Defence Forces “should be locked up”. He is also alleged to have said it was “illegal” for them to fight for Israel.
Starmer was accused of being “complicit” in a “disgusting display of antisemitism” by a group of Tory MPs earlier this week, who sent a joint letter calling for a list of names of those present at the meeting. They also asked whether any Labour members present reported the meeting to party authorities.
In a statement alongside the letter, former Tory chairman Jake Berry said: “It is vital that the Labour Party reveals who has been complicit in this disgusting display of antisemitism and did nothing to call it out.
“Labour claims to have changed. This proves that whatever they say, Keir Starmer is just the new leader of Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party.”
Starmer initially stood by Ali but he later withdrew his support for the candidate on Monday evening, saying “new information” had emerged.
Yesterday morning, Labour’s national campaign coordinator Pat McFadden said: “He’s issued a complete apology and retraction. And I hope he learns a good lesson from it because he should never have said something like that in the first place.”
But yesterday evening, a party spokesperson said: “Following new information about further comments made by Azhar Ali coming to light today, the Labour Party has withdrawn its support for Azhar Ali as our candidate in the Rochdale by-election.
“I’m aware from discussions with some of the MPs within the party who might be described as left-leaning that they feel that when it comes to disciplinary action taken against them then things move rather slowly, but if you’re in the right faction of the party, as it were, then things are dealt with either more leniently or more swiftly.
Forde noted that Labour MPs Diane Abbott and Kate Osamor had both apologised immediately after they were accused of antisemitism, but that “things seemed to drag on in terms of disciplining certain elements of the party, and be dealt with swiftly in others”.
He added: “This was a very inflammatory thing [for Ali] to say. That there is some complicity to justify retaliatory attacks was clearly antisemitic.”
On Thursday, February 15th, mainstream media giants in Germany began a massive, coordinated campaign promoting diversity—except, of course, diversity of opinion—and condemning what they call the “far-right,” showing just how afraid the establishment is of the rise of the right-wing populist Alternative für Deutschland (AfD), which is now polling at second place on national level, right behind the center-right Christian Democrat bloc (CDU/CSU).
A trip to “Together Land”
The campaign—named “#Zusammenland—Diversity makes us stronger”—begins with a colorful, double-page ad in newspapers and on digital outdoor advertising all throughout Germany, with the intention to continue using it in papers, public spaces, and social media for an indefinite time.
According to the press release of Ströer, the advertising agency tasked with coordinating the campaign, it was organized at the initiative of four legacy media giants—Die Zeit, Tagesspiegel, Süddeutsche Zeitung, and HandelsblattMedia Group.
Apart from the organizers, there are around 500 companies, foundations, and associations participating, and “taking a stand against right-wing extremism and committing to freedom, diversity, and a welcoming culture.”
The organizing publishers and media conglomerates are offering these companies and foundations an opportunity to integrate their logo into the campaign free of charge and ask them only to donate to certain charitable projects.
As the press release notes, the advertising space freed up for this campaign alone is worth “several million euros.”
There’s no official indication of whether the organizing companies were given any government support for doing this, but it’s hard to imagine they’d forgo millions of euros in ad revenue just to run expensive propaganda against a right-wing party just before the EU elections purely out of the goodness of their heart.
Orwellian doublespeak
At the same time, the German government is preparing new legislation, the “Democracy Promotion Act,” a vehicle to pour hundreds of millions worth of taxpayer funds into leftist organizations and giving them an official mandate for fighting “non-punishable”—or otherwise known as legal—hate speech on the internet, Exxpress reported.
“We want to take into account the fact that hatred on the internet also occurs below the criminal liability limit. Many enemies of democracy know exactly what is left of freedom of expression on the social media platforms,” Lisa Paus, Germany’s Green family minister explained. “As a federal government, we will review laws where necessary and readjust them if necessary.”
If this feels like the German government is boasting about waging a war against freedom of expression, it’s because it is.
The new legislation is not only meant to dramatically increase the share of taxpayer funds under the already existing “Demokratie leben!” financing framework—which last year awarded €182 million to over 700 leftist organizations and projects—but also to gradually roll out legal instruments that these organizations can use to take action against ‘hate speech’ that would be otherwise protected by law.
Fortunately, the Democracy Promotion Act might never leave the drafting table as the liberal FDP—the government’s smallest coalition partner—doesn’t like the idea of tinkering with the legal foundations of free speech, no matter how enthusiastic the other two ruling parties, the socialists (SDP) and the Greens are.
“The Democracy Promotion Act will not be realized in this form. I had doubts from the beginning because democracy can neither be prescribed nor rightly promoted with money,” FDP member Max Mordhorst said.
Bundestag Vice-President Wolfgang Kubicki, also from the FDP, was even more candid about the plans while taking a thinly-veiled jab at Paus: “One has to ask the question, who is actually more dangerous for our constitutional order: those who move within the limits of what is permitted, or those who want to limit the scope of what is permitted as they see fit.”
Correctiv, the non-profit investigative newsgroup that broke the story about a “conspiratorial” Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) gathering, turns out to have had secret meetings with the Federal Government, including the German Chancellor.
The German outlet claimed “deportations” of migrants were discussed at the “clandestine” get-together, although it later backtracked on that story.
Jeanette Gusko, the managing director of Correctiv, met officials from the German Government immediately before the supposed “secret meeting” in Potsdam, according to the news portal NIUS. That is a German media venture set up last year “to shake up the Liberal orthodoxy of the establishment press”, the UK’s Telegraph reported.
NIUS said she specifically participated in two previously unreported appointments in November in the Federal Chancellery and Leipzig.
Just eight days before the Potsdam conference at Lake Lehnitz, Gusko met in person with Chancellor Olaf Scholz.
This was unearthed by the Federal Government’s response to a written inquiry from Matthias Moosdorf, an AfD member of the Bundestag.
According to NIUS, Government leaders and Correctiv staff members have met 11 times over the past four years.
The Government did not reveal the content of those closed-door sessions. It asserted that private discussions between journalists and public authorities, safeguarded by press freedom, are considered confidential and for research purposes.
The Berliner Zeitung newspaper reported on several meetings and disclosed that, on June 2, 2020, there was one between Government officials, Correctiv and Facebook representatives to discuss the “fight against disinformation”.
Correctiv has been under increasing scrutiny after it turned out its report about the meeting in Potsdam, which spurred vehement condemnation of the AfD and “the far-right”, was not entirely accurate.
Anette Dowideit, the deputy editor-in-chief of Correctiv, said on January 28 that pivotal accusations regarding the issue did not occur “as generally reported”.
She said the Potsdam event was not “secretive” as such and no participant ever referred to “deportations of migrants” or to the Wannsee Conference, the 1942 meeting of high-ranking Nazi officials to plan the deportation and murder of Jewish people.
Such terms were “an interpretation” by the wider media, Dowideit claimed, despite the original article literally using those descriptions.
In January, NIUS revealed that, since its founding in 2014, Correctiv has raked in more than €3 million in taxpayers’ money, €1.2 million of which came from the Federal budget.
The German Commissioner for Culture and the Media, the Green MP Claudia Roth, also chimed in. She claimed €199,000 was allocated to the portal for the Correctiv project Qualify Local Journalism, Strengthen Democracy in 2022 and 2023. These funds are not listed on the news outlet’s website.
According to NIUS, in 2023, the Ministry of Family Affairs provided €61,000 for the Live Democracy programme and in 2022 and 2023, the Ministry of Research and Education transferred a total of €266,000 for a research project into disinformation called noFake.
Again, on its own website, Correctiv is rather vague about where it gets its funding from.
Alongside State Government funds, Correctiv also received large sums from the Halle federal treasury, from the State of North Rhine-Westphalia and from the Hanseatic City of Hamburg, NIUS said.
Foundations linked to political parties have also contributed considerable amounts of money, and these foundations receive funding from taxpayers, it reported.
Funding transfers came from the Greens-friendly Heinrich Böll Foundation, the Konrad Adenauer Foundation (associated with the Christian Democratic Union, CDU), and the Friedrich Naumann Foundation (connected with the Free Democratic Party, FDP), NIUS stated.
Five-figure amounts also arrived from State-owned or semi-State-owned companies including Telekom AG and Deutsche Bahn, which are partially controlled by the national Government, the news outlet claimed.
The apparently close ties between the Government and the news group seems to undermine its stated position that it is “oriented towards the common good” and “independent”, as described on the Correctiv website.
Gusko, who met Scholz on November 17, 2023, has said she is an “advocate of social justice”, a “leader for system change” and a “feminist” who has been well-connected to the Chancellor’s party, the SPD, “for years”.
Government representatives also reportedly met with Correctiv staff during Angela Merkel’s (CDU) tenure as chancellor from 2005 to 2021.
According to Berliner Zeitung, Correctiv CEO David Schraven in June 2020 visited the Ministry of the Interior for a private “exchange of ideas”.
Schraven and Government spokesman Steffen Hebestreit met twice to discuss so-called disinformation campaigns, it is reported.
In November 2022, he also apparently met Andreas Görgen, Roth’s ministerial representative.
As a result of the media reports of the Potsdam “secret meeting”, several participants have taken legal action.
The mayor of Marseille gave 80,000 euros to the United Nations agency for Palestinian Arabs, UNRWA, of which dozens of members are accused of participating in the October 7 massacre. Socialist mayor Benoît Payan had initially suspended the decision due to the controversy.
Why give money to an agency whose complicity in the massacres is proven and under whose headquarters in Gaza a Hamas tunnel and bunker have just been found?
Because Eurabia is Hamas’ best ally.
Marseille is the second largest city in France and is already 30-40 percent Muslim. George Soros’ Open Society also certifies this. Causeur magazine writes that “well over 50 percent of the Marseille population is North African and black African.”
The president of the Jewish community of Marseille, Zvi Ammar, asked fellow believers not to wear Jewish symbols on the street. Too dangerous. Like in Gaza. A student attempted to assassinate a Jewish teacher, “in the name of Allah,” because he was wearing a kippah.
Arab countries have distanced themselves from the Palestinian Arabs, considering them “troublemakers and liars,” says the Algerian novelist Boualem Sansal. “The Palestinians have thus turned to the West. All European countries have decided to support the Palestinians, financially and diplomatically. The Palestinians gained more from the West than from the Arab countries that sought to exploit them for internal reasons. The Palestinians have embassies in Paris, London, in the United States… This lobbying worked magnificently and we began to see more and more condemnations of Israel from Western countries.”
-Donation to UNRWA from Norway.
-Donation to UNRWA by Belgium.
-Donation to UNRWA by Scotland’s Muslim Prime Minister Humza Yousef.
Islamic fundamentalists know the soft underbelly of the West and they slide into it like a knife through butter. And if there is a country that is more slacker than others, it is Spain.
“Zorra”, this is the title of the single with which Nebulossa represent Spain at Eurovision. It is placed in the semantic field more or less at the crossroads between “bitch” and “slut”, a word that occurs dozens of times in the Nebulossa song at the center of the debate this week since it was selected to represent Spain in the Eurovision Song Contest .
Irene Montero, leader of Podemos candidate in the European elections and former minister of Equality, defended the song and said that the debate must revolve around the participation of Israel, which should be kicked out of Eurovision. Montero said that “Zorra” can be liked “more or less”, but that “the fundamental thing about Eurovision is to boycott Israel.
The Spanish Prime Minister, Pedro Sánchez, also defended “Zorra”, as did the Minister of Inclusion, Elma Saiz.
A country represented by a hymn to sluts.
Not bad for a government whose women parliamentarians attacked Israel on October 7 and whose Equality Minister, Ana Redondo, participated in demonstrations against sexism without saying anything about Hamas. Not only that, we saw Hamas “thanked” the city of Barcelona and the Spanish government for their support.
A high-ranking Spanish state official, Yolanda Diaz Perez, leader of the ruling Movimiento Sumar, second vice-president of the government and minister of labor, harangued a crowd in Cadiz on October 7 expressing support for the “brothers and sisters of the Palestinian people.”
Strange that in Israel Sánchez’s government is seen as a defender of Hamas.
Not bad, for a government that calls itself “feminist”, that has half of its ministers being women, that has launched the toy strike with which the Ministry of Consumer Affairs wanted to prevent girls from asking for dolls – and boys for balls – for Christmas; who created the “Law to guarantee sexual freedom”, the law of “only yes is yes” with the cry “nevermore rapes classified as abuse”, and who even promoted an app to “measure” how household chores are distributed in each family and fight “sexism”: the woman in the kitchen, the man on the sofa.
Equality Minister Montero said that “all cultures and religions” have ways “of oppressing women” and “disciplining their bodies.” “It happens in Afghanistan, but also in Spain”.
In Spain, where “sluts” are held up as examples of feminism? On El Mundo, Iranian women exiles in Spain meanwhile attack the socialist government for its silence on Iranian girls who fight against the state veil in Tehran.
What remains of the spirit of the West blows out of its soft borders.
During a “town hall” meeting with the public on Monday, the unelected Prime Minister of Britain Rishi Sunak was confronted by two men injured by mRNA COVID vaccines who claim to have been “silenced” by both social and mainstream media outlets.
Audience member John Watt rose first to challenge the U.K. leader: “I want you to look into my eyes, Rishi Sunak, and I want you to look at the pain, the trauma, and the regret I have in my eyes. We have been left with no help at all.”
“We are silenced, Rishi, on social media and everything. We are silenced!” Watt claimed. “We are the most silenced people in this country!”
Vaccine-Injured Man Confronts British Prime Minister on GB News
JOHN WATTS: "Hi, Rishi Sunak. I've got so much to say but such little time. My name is John Watt, and I'm one of the COVID vaccine injured in this country.
The news came as a visible shock to Sunak, who had consistently declared the so-called “vaccines” as “safe.” He repeated this line most recently in the House of Commons on January 31.
This is how Rishi Sunak responded to Andrew Bridgen minutes ago when he confronted him on the safety of Covid vaccines to a near full house:
"Let me be unequivocal from this dispatch box that Covid vaccines are safe."
“Let me be unequivocal from this dispatch box that COVID vaccines are safe,” he asserted.
Sunak was unsettled by Watt’s testimony, who suffers from postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), a condition that affects blood flow, following his COVID-19 injection.
Watt used his brief moment with the prime minister to highlight the plight of many others suffering “vaccine” injuries.
“Not only am I in here [who’s] vaccine injured; there’s another man over there whose life’s been ruined by that COVID-19 vaccine. I know people who have lost legs – amputations. I know people with heart conditions like myself, Rishi Sunak.”
A second member of the audience spoke out, denouncing the “silence in the press” over the scandal of “vaccine” injuries, saying his testimony had been censored:
Silence in the press because – my story in the press – I had to go to the government for comment, and they made them take all that [vaccine injury] stuff out.
Watt said the government’s “Yellow Card” system, intended to report and expedite compensation for “vaccine” injuries, was “not fit for purpose.”
A disturbed Sunak replied he was “happy” to take up these cases, saying,
Obviously, if there are individual circumstances which haven’t worked out, then that’s why we have the compensation scheme in place and I’ll make sure that we follow up on your cases.
Sunak then returned to the reasoning behind government policy under COVID – that politicians were following advice from “medical experts”:
The last thing I’d say is we went through a pandemic like everyone else at the points when it came to the vaccine.
Those decisions were always taken on the basis of medical advice from our medical experts to tell us, as politicians, who are obviously not doctors, about how best to roll out the vaccine, what was in the public health interest, the priority order, how that should be done, who should be eligible.
That was something that the doctors recommended on, and that’s something that we followed.
To test this claim of relying on medical expertise is to answer the question why the British prime minister is unaware of the scandalous harm caused by the so-called “vaccines.”
A growing scandal
So how do “medical experts” fare in the U.K., when they attempt to bring vaccine injuries to the attention of the authorities?
Dr. David Cartland is one “medical expert” who has suffered sustained ostracism and reputational damage for speaking out against the harms of the vaccine, and against the authoritarian government policies which underpin the wider COVID regime.
In a recent podcast for “Doctors for Freedom,” a platform he organized with Dr. Pat Morrissey, Cartland noted how U.K. government advice directs people to report any “misinformation” which “questions government guidelines” in the same way as suspected acts of terrorism.
Cartland mentions this at 7:25, in a broadcast which details his account of the unfolding “pandemic.”
It is a process which guided him, through his “observation of… blood clots and people dying in a short space of time,” from being given the so-called “vaccines.”
Cartland is a practicing Christian, who has been repeatedly de-platformed from social media for pointing out the enormous damage wrought by the injections promoted as “safe and effective.”
Cartland, who has faced years of professional and personal attacks for his stance on the vaccines, now faces a medical tribunal which could deprive him of the right to practice medicine – on charges of “transphobia” and “harassment.” A recent announcement on his twitter account notes:
I am being charged and sent to an MPT [medical practitioner tribunal] by the GMC for ME being the bully, harasser and inciter of hatred for calling out demonstrable lies.
Oh and being a transphobe (the evidence of which is actually laughable!).
The GMC continue to ignore prima facie evidence of this being the opposite way and that I am the victim of this coordinated attack on my licence to practice medicine.
He has repeatedly mentioned the secretive “77 Brigade” of the British Army Intelligence Corps in social media posts documenting attempts to suppress his attempts to warn of the dangers of the “vaccines.”
Why does this doctor complain about a covert Army Intelligence unit being used against him? Such measures were admitted by the U.K. government itself at the beginning of last year.
His claim about authoritarian measures over the control of the COVID narrative are supported by evidence that British Army intelligence were indeed spying on critics of lockdown.
In this video from January 2023, British journalist Rod Liddle responded to an initial report by surveillance watchdog Big Brother Watch, whose investigation revealed that the secretive “77 Brigade” had “scoured social media to assess U.K. disinformation” on COVID. In January 2023 then U.K. Defence Secretary Ben Wallace admitted this military unit had been deployed against the British public to spy on – and censor – them.
Liddle remarked that “the liberals don’t want to report this kind of thing,” noting that neither the Times newspaper nor the BBC had picked up the story. Why didn’t the establishment media report this?
“They don’t care when the laws are broken by people they agree with.”
This “kind of thing” included monitoring leading lockdown critic Peter Hitchens. Big Brother watch said at the time:
Big Brother Watch’s investigation identified a number of MPs, journalists, top academics and campaigners whose social media posts had been monitored and logged in secret reports.
The monitoring was in addition to censorship, with comments flagged and removed. A separate report published in January 2023 shows that the campaign of surveillance and censorship includes criticism of any government policy – not merely those pertaining to COVID.
“Secretive Whitehall units have been monitoring government critics’ speech online – including MPs, academics, journalists, human rights campaigners and the public – under the guise of combatting ‘disinformation.’”
The report, titled “Ministry of Truth – Secret Government Units Spying on Your Speech,” can be found here. The legacy of a coordinated effort to smear and undermine critics of government COVID policy was witnessed in the aftermath of Sunak’s response to Watt.
Media business as usual
On the day after Sunak’s exchange with John Watt, the editor of the U.K. Daily Mirror, Kevin Maguire, went on television to discuss the merits of U.K. political leaders answering directly to the public.
“Did you watch the bit where some ‘anti-vaxxer’ went on and on and on at Rishi Sunak?”
“Why would [opposition leader] Keir Starmer subject himself to that?”
Maguire’s remarks were noted by VIBUK, a charity set up to campaign for the visibility and rights of the “vaccine” injured, in a post on X (formerly Twitter) on February 13:
Today Kevin Maguire branded John Watt an anti-vaxer.
John became critically ill following his Pfizer vaccine and now suffers with a heart condition and POTS.
He had his vaccine so is clearly not ‘anti’ vaccine, but people like Kevin Maguire continue to try to defame those who speak out. They try to silence us!
Last night @RishiSunak told severely injured John Watt-@Nohj_85 that he was ‘shocked and surprised’ that the vaccine injured and bereaved feel they have been silenced! He also repeatedly stated there is a compensation scheme for those affected… this is wrong, it is not…
The post asked for testimony from the injured, who responded in number with many stories of life-changing injuries, including heart conditions, organ damage, debility, and death.
Watt replied to the charge of “anti-vaxxer” in a segment broadcasted on GB News, pointing out he took “three of these vaccines.”
'I took THREE of these vaccines. Does this man have any idea how stupid he sounds at this point?'
Vaccine injury victim, John Watt, claps back at journalist Kevin Maguire after he branded Watt an 'anti-vaxxer' on Good Morning Britain. pic.twitter.com/o46TnvIfXu
“What is an anti-vaxxer? I took three of these vaccines,” Watt stated. “The language people are using – saying ‘anti-vaxx’ – the narrative of safe and effective – can someone show me one instance of someone being saved by the vaccine?”
“Because since the roll-out, there has been a massive increase in people dying.”
“One of the reasons I spoke out is that I am not going to be a ‘died suddenly’ statistic.”
Watt’s case has now been put to the prime minister. His story is situated in a wider context of authoritarian coercion, censorship, the persecution of medical experts, and the chilling reminder from Big Brother Watch’s Silkie Carlo, who said in January 2023:
It is deeply concerning that the Defence Secretary appeared to suggest that military power has been intentionally deployed towards social media users in the U.K.
It is vital that the 77th Brigade’s digital activities in the U.K. are urgently investigated.
There has been no investigation. That the “misinformation” of “anti-vaxxers” comes as a shock to Rishi Sunak suggests that the operation to suppress the truth about the “vaccines” has safely and effectively insulated the British prime minister from the terrible truth.
The bank Sparkasse Mittelfranken-Süd has sent a threatening letter to one of its customers after he transferred a three-digit sum donation to the federal office of the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party, raising questions as to whether banks might begin—or perhaps have already started—blocking transfers to the right-wing opposition party.
A copy of the letter, obtained by the newspaper Junge Freiheit, reads: “The recipient of the payment has a right-wing extremist orientation. Sparkasse Mittelfranken-Süd does not accept such payments. In your own interest, please stop such payments.”
News of the threatening letter comes just days after Germany’s left-activist Interior Minister Nancy Faeser announced her intention to effectively suspend banking secrecy for supposed ‘right-wing extremists.’ Under Faeser’s plan, soon to be scrutinized by the Federal Constitutional Court, Germany’s domestic intelligence agency has the authority to request information on transactions and accounts carried out and held by ‘right-wing extremists’—those deemed to be jeopardizing the fundamental principles of a free and democratic society.
“If we have evidence that money is being used to finance illegal things to prevent the basic democratic order, then we can also close down accounts,” Faeser said.
The phrase “prevent the basic democratic order” is a direct reference to activities that can lead to a party being banned under the German Constitution. The AfD has repeatedly expressed its commitment to the German Basic Law (constitution).
Seeking clarification on the incident, the Berlin-based conservative newspaper contacted the bank for a comment, to which the bank confirmed that the letter was indeed authentic. The bank’s spokesman, however, claimed that the letter was “actually a mistake” and that the customer “will also be informed accordingly.”
Junge Freiheit writes that the letter could not be directly traced back to the bank but to an external service provider contracted by the bank to monitor transactions for signs of potential money laundering. Considering the content contained in the letter—combined with the fact that a few Alternative for Germany (AfD) state associations have been branded as ‘right-wing extremist’ by the politicized Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV)—it is possible that this is what led to the letter being sent out.
Sparkasse, however, neither confirmed nor denied whether the letter was sent out by the bank or an external service provider, telling the newspaper that the bank “generally does not disclose information about our IT security systems.”
The external financial service provider has not yet responded to Junge Freiheit’s inquiry into the matter.
Wolfgang Kubicki (FDP), vice president of the Bundestag, told BILD in a comment on the events:
This case must be clarified, because such a letter is usually not written and sent ‘accidentally’. You don’t have to be a friend of the AfD to realize that such a threatening letter has nothing to do with a democratic debate.
This is the shocking moment five transgender players hijack a women’s college volleyball game in Canada.
Footage showed the five athletes ‘dominate’ a women’s volleyball match between Seneca College and Centennial College in Toronto on on January 24.
The biologically male athletes were seen smashing the ball past their female teammates. The controversial players each stayed on the court for the entire game – while the biologically female players were substituted on and off the bench.
The game sparked outrage among conservatives, who raised health fears for the women athletes and were furious to see them being benched.
Seneca played three transgender women during the game, while Centennial played with two trans players.
A report from Rebel News said the trans players ‘dominated’ the game, especially when it came to ‘serving and spiking.’
‘Real biological women have needed medical assistance thanks to taking spikes off their head,’ David Menzies, who was there to observe the game, said.
The biological males were ‘always’ on the court, meaning there were at least five female players benched at any given moment of the game.
Seneca College, the school with more trans players, won the best-of-five series. Menzies was ushered away when he tried to interview players and coaches about the spots transgender players take up on women’s teams.
Menzies said: ‘They are using this sport to pay for their tuition.’ It was unclear whether he was speaking specifically about the players on the court or in general.
An anonymous source told the reporter that there have been ‘two major head injuries to female volleyball athletes in the Ontario Colleges Athletic Association caused by transgender people.’
The first reported injury was a concussion last November caused by C.L. Viloria, who plays for Centennial.
‘Viloria attacked the ball with heavy force and hit a La Cite volleyball player in the head,’ said the source.
The second injury occurred on January 22, 2024 when Franz Largadas, a trans player who also plays for Seneca, ‘hit a La Cite player in the head’ causing a concussion.
‘In the 2022-23 season, Franz was listed on the Seneca College men’s volleyball team roster and is now on the women’s volleyball team roster this year,’ said the source.
‘Five of which are not on any gender-affirming hormone therapy or have not had surgical gonad removal.
‘There is no current policy in the OCAA that is listed publicly on their website about eligibility of transgender women,’ they said.
The other three trans players at the recent game were Ara Telan, Jhessi Garcia, and Jaque Ronquillo.
One student who had been in the stands watching the game got heated with Menzies on the way out of the auditorium.
You can go ‘rot in hell,’ one of them screamed at him, ‘you white piece of sh**.’
When Menzies’ camera-woman panned to students some of them seemed to be chuckling at the hysterical student who was still shouting.
At present there are six biological men playing in the OCAA, according to the source. Both Seneca and Centennial are members.
