Silvio Berlusconi has died aged 86

alessio85, Wikimedia Commons ,CC-BY-2.0

Ex premier Silvio Berlusconi died at Milan’s San Raffaele hospital on Monday aged 86, sources close to the family have said. 

His brother Paolo and his children Marina, Eleonora, Barbara and Pier Silvio are all at the hospital where the leader of Forza Italia was admitted on Friday, reportedly for scheduled tests for his previously undisclosed chronic leukemia. 

He returned to the Milan hospital less than a month after spending 45 days there for treatment for a lung infection related to the leukemia, including 16 days in intensive care. 

His death made instant headlines all over the world.

https://www.ansa.it/english/news/2023/06/12/silvio-berlusconi-has-died-aged-86_37cb7765-e0f8-4615-8b1e-939f0537b0a3.html

Austria Learns About Muslim Hate

Image: PxHere

By Raymond Ibrahim

The good people of Austria are shocked — shocked, I say! — to learn that the Muslims they’ve invited to live among and benefit from them hold to various divisive, if not downright hostile, doctrines.

According to a May 10, 2023 article, “alarm bells are ringing” in Austria following the publication of a report on what Austrian mosques are teaching to Muslims.

One of these teachings, according to the report, is that “Muslim children should only have Muslim friends.”  To underscore the magnitude of this finding, keep in mind that there are now more Muslims than Catholics in Vienna, Linz, and other Upper Austrian regions.

Commenting on this divisive finding that impacts such a large demographic, Manfred Haimbuchner of Austria’s conservative Freedom Party said:

So Muslims should only be friends with Muslims? This is taught in the Upper Austrian mosques. What does [Austrian president] Van der Bellen say about this? What is the President’s opinion on this fact?

In fact, all Western leaders would do well to ponder and answer this question — not least as the call for Muslims not to befriend non-Muslims is not some aberration unique to Islam in Austria, but is rather a mainstream Islamic teaching that goes straight back to the Koran.  Here, for example, is Koran 3:28:

Let believers [Muslims] not take infidels [non-Muslims] for friends and allies in place of believers.  Whoever does so will have nothing to hope for from Allah — unless it is by way of taqiyya against them.

The latter portion of that verse referencing taqiyya means that, whenever Muslims are in a position of weakness, they may pretend to befriend and ally with non-Muslims, as long as they continue harboring hate for the infidels in their hearts (for other Islamic-sanctioned forms of deception, read about tawriya and taysir).

Koran 5:51 is even more explicit, and names names:

O believers! Take neither Jews nor Christians for friends and allies — for they are friends and allies of one another. Whoever does so will be counted as one of them. Surely Allah does not guide the wrongdoing people.

But the matter is far worse than not befriending non-Muslims. Koran 60:4 calls for Muslims to perpetually hate all non-Muslims until they “believe in Allah alone.”  Here is how Osama bin Laden explained that verse:

As to the relationship between Muslims and infidels, this is summarized by the Most High’s Word: “We renounce you. Enmity and hate shall forever reign between us — till you believe in Allah alone” [Koran 60:4]. So there is an enmity, evidenced by fierce hostility from the heart. And this fierce hostility — that is, battle — ceases only if the infidel submits to the authority of Islam, or if his blood is forbidden from being shed [i.e., a dhimmi], or if Muslims are at that point in time weak and incapable [of going on the offensive]. But if the hate at any time extinguishes from the heart, this is great apostasy!… Such, then, is the basis and foundation of the relationship between the infidel and the Muslim. Battle, animosity, and hatred — directed from the Muslim to the infidel — is the foundation of our religion.  (The Al Qaeda Reader, p. 43).

Similarly, after quoting the hate-all-infidels verse, Koran 60:4, the Islamic State (ISIS) confessed to the West that “We hate you, first and foremost, because you are disbelievers.”  As for any and all political “grievances,” these are “secondary” reasons for the jihad, the group said:

The fact is, even if you were to stop bombing us, imprisoning us, torturing us, vilifying us, and usurping our lands, we would continue to hate you because our primary reason for hating you will not cease to exist until you embrace Islam. Even if you were to pay jizyah and live under the authority of Islam in humiliation, we would continue to hate you.

Many other hostile and divisive verses permeate the Koran (see also 4:89, 4:144, 5:51, 5:54, 6:40, 9:23, and 60:1).  Koran 58:22 goes as far as to praise Muslims who kill their own non-Muslim family members. 

Little wonder, then, that America’s supposed best Muslim friends and allies — such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar — have issued fatwas (in Arabic) calling on all Muslims to “oppose and hate whomever Allah commands us to oppose and hate, including the Jews, the Christians, and other mushrikin [polytheists, blanket term for non-Muslims], until they believe in Allah alone and abide by his laws, which he sent down to his Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings upon him.”

The matter is such that, because enmity for non-Muslims is so ironclad in the Koran, mainstream Islamic teaching holds that Muslim men must even hate — and show that they hate — their non-Muslim wives, while enjoying them sexually, or for their wealth, etc.

Returning to an Austria that is shocked to learn that local mosques are indoctrinating Muslim children not to befriend non-Muslims, Manfred Haimbuchner, after pointing out that, for Muslims in Austria, “integration is apparently undesirable and actively prevented by teaching in mosques,” said,

We stand for the practice of religion within the framework of religious freedom. However, if an ideology is spread under the guise of religious freedom that is not compatible with the values of Austrian society, the state must take action.

In other words, if a “religion,” in this case, Islam, preaches things that go directly against the values of any given state — for example, that people should be hated on account of their religion — should that state tolerate it?

The answer is obvious, but will anyone do anything about it, or will they continue thrusting their heads in the sand in the name of “inclusivity,” “multiculturalism,” and the rest?

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/06/austria_learns_about_muslim_hate.html

Novak Djokovic Wins French Open, Sets Record for Most Grand Slam Wins – Despite Being Banned by US and Australian Officials for Refusing COVID Vax …And Bill Gates Was in the Crowd

2023 Condensed Into 25 Seconds

Screen grab twitter

If you think you can stomach America in the year 2023 condensed into a 25-second video clip, go ahead and click View. Not for children or those with weak heart:

If only she had been brandishing a Pride Progress flag, and the Prius had featured a Coexist bumper sticker, this would have been perfect.

https://moonbattery.com/2023-condensed-into-25-seconds/

Thank the army, not the jungle, for the rescue of four Colombian children

Image: Ministerio de Defensa Nacional, Colombia // press handout

By Monica Showalter

Following the news of a dramatic rescue of four children lost in the Amazon jungle, Colombia’s far-left president, Gustavo Petro, praised the children who survived in that fearsome wilderness for 40 days as “children of the jungle.”

“The jungle saved them” Petro said. “They are children of the jungle, and now they are also children of Colombia.

“Children of the jungle”?

That’s like calling children who survived a nuclear meltdown “children of the reactor” or kids who survived under earthquake rubble “children of the temblor.” Does anyone call champion surfer Bethany Hamilton, who was injured in a shark attack as a young girl a “child of the shark”?

They’re disaster survivors, and yes, it was they, not the jungle, whose survival actions brought forth their heroism.

That was the whole problem with the lefty “narratives” surrounding this jungle rescue. 

According to CNN, Petro babbled on and on in the same way, using the dreamy language of Euro-intellectuals still ensconced with the Rousseauvian romance of the jungle and all its noble savages:

He called the children’s survival a “gift to life” and an indication that they were “cared for by the jungle.”

Actually, the jungle tried to kill them.

If the children are like many people, they may not want to see the inside of a jungle ever again.

The Colombian jungle is full of incredible horrors — from jaguars, to black panthers, to anaconda snakes, to poison frogs, to giant bats, to mosquitos, to spikes, spiney vines, and thorns, to pits, mud, rocks, falls, quicksand, and slime, to poisonous plants and fruit, with every giant crawling, biting, thing imaginable. It’s a vector for countless tropical diseases — look up the horrible details of one of the common ones, leishmanosis, which has afflicted past victims of the Colombian jungle — plus drug dealers, pirates, criminals, narcoterrorists, and raging primates with big teeth. The photos from the rescue suggest that it was the real thing as jungles go.

Imagine what that place sounded like at night in pitch darkness as wild animals screamed. Imagine trying to change a baby’s diaper on the muddy jungle floor, bugs and mosquitos all around, listening warily for sounds of jaguars and the footsteps of other predators. Reportedly the predator they did have to fight off was a vicious dog.

The care didn’t come from the jungle.

It came from the resourceful 13-year-old indigenous girl named Lesly, who used her babysitter skills to keep the other three children, including the infant named Cristian, alive and together throughout the ordeal. Apparently it was what she did anyway during her life while her mother worked. 

It had to have been a hard life.

But it didn’t stop Petro from waxing romantic about indigenous people’s lives, and the fact that the children came from an indigenous background, attributing the survival of the kids to their indigenous heritage as if Indians are just born with knowing how to navigate the jungle:

“Their learning from indigenous families and their learning of living in the jungle has saved them,” Petro told reporters on Friday, after announcing on Twitter that they had been found 40 days after they went missing following a plane crash that killed their mother.

Which sounds a lot like Rousseavian noble savage claptrap. The kids may have known some things from their elders, reportedly of the Huitoto people (they dress like this), or possibly the Guanano people (news reports conflict) about where the poisonous foods were in the jungle, and yes, any survival skills they did have from their forebears were a lot more constructive for kids (of any nationality) to have than pronoun usage, but they didn’t seem entirely indigenous in the way they lived. They didn’t live every day like these people.

According to CNN, the children’s family members lived in Villavicencio, a good-sized city of 500,000 in central Colombia, which was last in the news in 2007, when Oliver Stone joined hands with Hugo Chavez in a failed effort to free hostages held by Marxist narcoterrorists in the jungle. Photos show they were rescued wearing western clothes, such as blue jeans. Subsequent photos show that their grandfather, and father, who greeted them at the airport, had western clothes on, too. Their last names — Mucutuy — were indigenous but they had first names like Lesly and Cristian, and their mother’s name was Magdalena, suggesting a citified Christian heritage, augmented by the fact that their family members thanked God Almighty, and not an indigenous god, for their rescue. 

“For us this situation was like being in the dark, we walked for the sake of walking. Living for the sake of living because the hope of finding them kept us alive. When we found the children we felt joy, we don’t know what to do, but we are grateful to God,” he said.

That was their grandfather speaking, according to CNN. Before their plane went down, killing their mother and two other adults, it’s noteworthy also that they were traveling by Cessna, which is commonly done as a means of getting around the region for city people, but as a means of travel is far rarer for very indigenous people to do.

Spare us the romance about indigenous people. The rescued children had an indigenous background, but they were pretty much like other Colombians.

As for the children being “saved” by the jungle, as Petro waxed, well, baloney there, too.

They were saved by the Colombian army which rescued the kids with a helicopter hovering over the jungle canopy and then transported them to care in the faraway big city of Bogota where they will be recovering for weeks. The kids survived just barely after their ordeal, they didn’t have any kinds of superior native American knowledge about how to survive for 40 days in the jungle, as if any self-respecting indigenous person would do that anyway. The army conducted the search, they knew enough to make leaflet drops over the jungle floor, they dropped food caches, and they brought the children’s grandmother onboard the effort by having her make recordings to be broadcast over the jungle canopy from above, assuring the kids they were looking for them, encouraging the kids to carry on, and asking them to stay in one place so they could be found by rescuers.

That’s practical stuff, the product of planning and experience. It’s not some magical romantically viewed jungle that somehow saved the kids.

It was the army.

Even the indigenous people who know the jungle pretty well hold no romantic views of it:

Members of the indigenous community held traditional ceremonies ‘speaking to the jungle’ and asking it to give up the children.

Translation: The damn thing was holding the kids hostage and the Indians were engaging in hostage negotiations the best way they knew how.

Here’s the rest of the wittingly or unwittingly obnoxious thing he said:

“They are children of the jungle and now they are children of Colombia,” he added.

Is Petro saying they weren’t children of Colombia before that? And indigenous kids need to pass some kind of hellish survival test to get that Colombian passport? Last I heard, they were always Colombian. I suspect he meant well, trying to reference that the whole country was proud of the childrens and the rescue effort. But that contained the residue of statements in the past made by leftist intellectuals, that indigenous people were never quite Colombian, which is nonsense.

The children who knew just enough to survive were heroes, the local people who helped with the search and rescue were heroes, and the Colombian army which rescued the children were heroes.

The jungle and all lefty romance surrounding it was not the hero. To say they were is to minimize the heroism that did happen and should be celebrated.

The kids can do without that, and so can the rest of us.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2023/06/thank_the_army_not_the_jungle_for_the_rescue_of_the_four_colombian_children.html

Islamophobia: Whose fault is it anyway?

America’s Charlie Hebdo moment

An incident occurred in October 2022 at Hamlin University in St. Paul, Minnesota. As part of her presentation, an associate professor of history displayed a 14th-century Persian artwork of the Prophet Muhammad in her class. Some members of the Muslim Student Association (MSA) were evidently offended by this display and lodged a complaint with school officials. Jaylani Hussain, the executive director of the Minnesota Chapter of CAIR (the Council on American-Islamic Relations), accused the Professor of exhibiting Islamophobia and suggested that if the institution did not take appropriate action, it would be subjected to violence like in the Charlie Hebdo incident in Paris in 2015.

Even though the professor in question issued a written apology, the complaints persisted until the university fired her, citing the incident as the reason for their decision.

There was a swift reaction to Hamlin University’s actions. The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) and Academic Freedom Alliance, both based in Princeton, NJ, as well as PEN America, the American Association of University Professors (AAUP), and the New York Times, all condemned Hamlin for infringing on an instructor’s freedom to teach the course material, and for merely showing an existing artwork from Islamic sources.

In view of the CAIR leader’s threat of violence, the incident came to be referred to as the “Charlie Hebdo moment of America.”

Unfortunately, in a world where political correctness reigns supreme, one is not supposed to ask the tough questions. However, if we are to understand the interplay between the ever-present Islamic overreaction to routine situations and the phenomenon of Islamophobia, we must address the following questions:

  • Is there something fundamental in the nature of the Islamic community that elicits “phobia?”
  • While the Muslim community expects special consideration from others in matters of faith, does it extend the same courtesy to other faiths?
The religion of Peace?  

The Islamic community loses no opportunity to proclaim their religion as the “religion of peace.” However, given the readiness with which the Islamic community uses violence or threat of violence, even in routine matters, one wonders how it rationalizes its violent behavior with the brand image it would like to project.

Islam, from its very birth, has shown an extreme propensity for violence. It has ravaged nations, committed mass murders, and destroyed places of worship of other faiths on a scale that is unparalleled in human history. Its adherents have indiscriminately massacred people of other faiths for no other reason than that they did not believe in Islam. This proclivity for violence continues to this day, as evidenced by numerous terrorist attacks around the world, including the 9/11 incident and the Boston Bombing incident, as well as the indiscriminate killing and forced conversion of non-Muslim minorities in Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Afghanistan.

The Muslim community has been ruthless with its own kind as well. From the brutal suppression of the Arab Spring uprisings to the interminable civil wars in the Middle East, the Hijab protests in Iran, the denial of basic human rights to women in Afghanistan, to the millions killed in the never-ending Sunni-Shia conflicts, all bear witness to Islamic penchant for violence. The simple fact is that Islam and extremism seem to go together.

Since phobia means fear In Greek, is it not logical that the constant presence or threat of violence from Muslims would give rise to a “phobia of Islam”?

Some try to argue that it is the fringe element in Islam that is responsible for all the violence. However, that narrative bears no credibility given that 90% of the terrorist organizations on the U.S. Government’s watchlist are of Islamic persuasion [1] or that 15% of the global Muslim population has the potential to be a terrorist should the opportunity arise[2].

Clearly, the Muslim community needs to clean up its act if it wants to be respected as the “religion of peace.”  

 Nice Begets Nice

Muslims living in non-Muslim countries are invariably accorded status parity with the general population. However, Muslim-majority societies do not extend the same courtesy to their non-Muslims minorities. In fact, in most Muslim-majority societies, the minorities live a miserable existence. They are often denied the basic human rights to pray in public, gather for religious purposes, or display their religious texts and symbols. They are not permitted to build their places of worship; in fact, their places of worship are razed to the ground with great regularity and celebrated as acts of piety. The destruction of the Bamiyan Buddha is one of numerous such examples. Even if one chooses to overlook the terrible destruction the Islamic zealots have wrought on Hindu temples in India over the last 1000 years, one cannot ignore the continued desecration of Hindu temples in Bangladesh and Pakistan occurring in our own times. Other non-Muslim minorities fare no better in these countries.

Frankly, the Muslim community could learn a lot from the well-known adage: “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”

What’s with the ever-present chip-on-the-shoulder?

It is no exaggeration to say that, in matters of faith, Muslims are cognitively wired to interpret ambiguous situations negatively, and their reaction is invariably disproportionate to the situation.

Islam is the second largest religion in the world, with over 1.9 billion adherents and 27 declared Islamic theocratic countries. Yet, despite such overwhelming numerical strength, the Muslim community always reacts with hypersensitivity to any perceived criticism of their religious norms. It defies common sense that the display of artwork from an Islamic source, no less, would invite an overwhelming violent reaction from the entire Muslim community. Similarly, it makes no sense that a Muslim in Kosovo, say, would feel impelled to respond to a relatively minor incident in the US. Why is it that the Muslim community invariably enlists support from the entire Muslim community around the world?

Unless, of course, it has a deep-seated insecurity about its basic ideology.

To conclude…

Contrary to whatever the Muslims of the world might think, the world does not hate them. People simply want to live in peace and harmony. But how can peace and harmony prevail when more than a billion out of the eight billion citizens of the world are constantly on a war path with the rest?

Citations
[1] Counterterrorism Guide – National Counterterrorism Center (dni.gov)
[2] https://www.danielpipes.org/comments/65537

https://hindudvesha.org/islamophobia-whose-fault-is-it-anyway/

California bill would ban retail employees from trying to stop thieves

By Eric Utter

Lawmakers in the erstwhile Golden State of California are hoping to push through controversial legislation that would ban retail staff from attempting to prevent thieves from stealing from their stores. Senate Bill 553, which was submitted by State Senator Dave Cortese, has been passed by the State Senate and will now progress to policy committees in the State Assembly. Cortese claims he hopes the proposed law will prevent workplace violence and protect staff from being injured during robberies.

State Senator Dan Cortese (YouTube screengrab)
Note that Senator Cortese is not indicating how much can be shoplifted under his bill. He is addressing another matter on the floor of the California State Senate.

But many retailers, from store managers on down, are furious over the plans. The California Retailers Association characterized the move as “an open invitation for thieves to come in and steal.” As if yet another incentive to steal were somehow necessary in a state where theft of up to $950 isn’t even prosecuted. Retailers, small and large, are closing their stores in cities like San Francisco, Los Angeles, Seattle, and Portland because of asinine policies just like the one proposed by Sen. Cortese.

If SB 553 passes, it would effectively make it a crime…to try to prevent a crime.

Could there be a more perfect illustration of progressive lunacy than that?

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2023/06/california_bill_would_ban_retail_employees_from_trying_to_stop_thieves.html