India: Muslim tried to rape a cow in Haldwani, locals shave his head in protest, heavy police force deployed in the area

The accused tried to rape a cow. (Source: Organiser)

A lot of incidents where individuals were caught performing unnatural acts with bovines particularly cows have come to light in the past few weeks. In another disturbing occurrence, a Muslim man named Mohammad Nafees was caught while attempting to rape a cow in Haldwani, Uttarakhand, after which the furious locals hauled him to Lama Square, shaved his head and painted his face black in protest.

A video of the accused became viral on social media on June 14 in which he can be seen surrounded by people. Interestingly, Kalawa, a sacred thread worn by Hindus, was also spotted on his wrist.

A man in the clip can be heard stating, “He has a Kalawa on his hand to trick us. He was caught performing unnatural acts with a cow. He identified himself as Nafees. We have all granted these people (Muslims) access to our shops in this neighbourhood as well as all the nearby ones. Now, a lot of doubts have been raised because of this man.”

“He is acting in this manner while donning a Kalawa. You are all being forewarned since we have children in our family. Can those who are capable of doing this to a cow spare your family members? Are your spouses, sisters, brothers, and kids secure from them,” he asked.

The culprit was handed over to the police. Further action, in this case, is awaited. Meanwhile, Muslims have also closed their shops in retaliation. Heavy police are deployed in the area due to the growing tensions.

Notably, this month, Usman Khan tried to rape a pregnant cow called Nandini which was owned by a Bajrang Dal activist Nilesh Vijay Chaskar behind a hotel named Apulaki. He was turned over to the police, and the following day a formal complaint was brought against him. He admitted to the crime and maintained that he did it while under the influence of alcohol.

Hasan Khan, a cloth trader from Delhi, was arrested last month after engaging in the repulsive act of bestiality on a cow in Chhattisgarh’s Durg district. He was residing in a Housing Board Colony there. The entire act was recorded on a CCTV camera. He was arrested from the Gondia district of Maharashtra after a major uproar from Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha and other Hindu organisations.

In the Durg region of Chhattisgarh, Mohammad Sahil (18) and three other individuals were apprehended in March for participating in intercourse with a cow. The accused was reportedly drunk when the offence was carried out. A case was lodged at Bhilai Bhatti Police Station under sections 377 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

https://www.opindia.com/2023/06/haldwani-mohammad-nafees-tried-to-rape-a-cow-locals-shave-his-head/

India: Leading Islamist seminary Darul Uloom Deoband bans students from learning English or ‘any other language’

The education department of Darul Uloom Deoband has issued an order, prohibiting students from learning English or any other language while studying in the Islamic seminary.

The new order, issued by Maulana Hussain Haridwari, the in-charge of the department, emphasizes strict adherence and warns of expulsion for non-compliance.

Under the directive, students are prohibited from learning English throughout their tenure at the institution.

“Any student found violating this restriction, or secretly engaging in language study, will face expulsion from the institution. Also, the students found absent from classrooms or leaving before the completion of their classes will face severe consequences,” the order stated.

Criticizing the management’s decision, a student, requesting anonymity, said, “While we acknowledge that Darul Uloom is dedicated to Islamic studies, preventing students from learning English or any other language seems unreasonable.”

“Management should reconsider their stance,” the student said.

https://hindupost.in/dharma-religion/leading-islamist-seminary-darul-uloom-deoband-bans-students-from-learning-english-or-any-other-language/

German Authorities Investigating Rammstein’s Till Lindemann for Multiple Sexual Assault Accusations – Metal Band Leader Also Suspected of Drugging the Fans

Martin Hangen, Wikimedia Commons , CC-BY-3.0

Anger grows across Europe over EU’s mandatory migrant quotas

Conservative European parties, as well as governments like Poland’s, are launching various measures to push back against a new EU law that will lead to forced migrant relocations across Europe. The law could particularly affect nations such as Hungary and Poland that have been traditionally opposed to mass immigration, but other conservative parties from countries like Germany and Austria are also calling for referendums and other actions against the EU’s migrant quota scheme.

In Poland, the country’s parliament has launched a video campaign against the measure and is about to adopt a resolution proposal authorizing the government to exercise its veto power and not accept the proposal on migrant quotas at the next EU summit. There is also talk of putting the question of mandatory migrant quotas to a national referendum, which will run simultaneously during national elections this autumn.

In Austria, meanwhile, an online petition was launched to reject forced resettlement, while the German right has also protested the controversial new measure.

Poland’s ruling Law and Justice (PiS) party has prepared a draft resolution that would give the government a strong mandate to reject the forced resettlement of migrants based on quotas from Brussels.

The forced migrant quotas, as a part of the EU Pact on Migration and Asylum, were decided last week at the council of the EU interior ministers. According to the plans, EU member states will either accept a certain number of immigrants or be forced to pay at least €20,000 per migrant into the EU coffers. 

Rafal Bochenek, the PiS party’s spokesperson, recalled that the Polish parliament had passed resolutions similar to the current one before, for example in 2016, but they gave the authority to discuss these issues at the EU level. 

“Now, we want to give the Polish government a strong mandate to use a veto in the European Council,” said the spokesperson of the ruling party. The politicians of Law and Justice wrote in the draft resolution that “The Sejm of the Republic of Poland strongly opposes the attempt to introduce mechanisms for the forced resettlement of illegal economic migrants at the EU level.” 

Austria’s FPÖ also calls for referendum

However, Poland is not the only country considering a referendum on the issue, with Austria’s most popular party, the Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ), also calling for a national vote.

“Should the law pass the European Parliament, the FPÖ demands a referendum in Austria on this asylum package, because this agreement does nothing to turn Europe into a fortress. That is why politicians must do everything we can to implement a ‘Fortress Austria’ and to protect the country from the new migration of peoples,” said FPÖ leader Herbert Kickl.

Kickl has skewered Austria’s government for going along with the proposal, claiming it has “stabbed Austrians in the back.” The FPÖ has long criticized the Christian democrats, the ÖVP, for being weak on immigration and other conservative ideals.

Kickl said the new rules are the EU’s attempt to “take us for a fool,” and although the EU claims to be tightening standards against economic migration, “the truth is the new asylum rules bring additional burdens for Austria. ÖVP Interior Minister Gerhard Karner has failed in his central promise to prevent a redistribution of asylum seekers. He’s stabbing the Austrians in the back with that,” said Kickl.

“Unfortunately, the much-celebrated compromise does not change the overall situation, with the exception that there should now be a distribution mechanism that is at the expense of economically stronger member countries. Because in the future, Austria would have to pay a fine if it refuses to accept asylum seekers. Approval for such a distribution has been an absolute ‘no go’ since FPÖ Interior Minister Kickl. The ÖVP has also always spoken out against it – until Mr. Karner simply fell over on this issue yesterday,” said FPÖ security spokesperson Hannes Amesbauer.

“Yesterday was a black day for the Austrian population in the truest sense of the word,” concluded Kickl.

The FPÖ is now launching an online petition entitled “Austria’s Fortress against illegal mass immigration.”

In promoting the new petition, Kickl noted that Austria has been hit twice in the last eight years by large waves of migration, both of which caused enormous damage across the country.

“Since 2015, the EU has missed every opportunity to protect the citizens of Europe from the import of terror and social tensions,” said MEP Harald Vilimsky, head of the European delegation of the FPÖ. He said he believes that the only hope is that with next year’s EU elections, a fundamental change can be initiated, and then a referendum can be used to deviate from this mistaken path. According to the MEP, help should be provided in the migrants’ homeland so that they do not leave.

The EU missed all the opportunities to address the migration crisis

Sharp criticism also comes from Germany’s Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, which criticized the EU’s adopted draft as extremely dangerous.

“Under pressure from the German government, unaccompanied minors can easily cross the external border without stopping, including via expedited procedure. The same applies, for example, to entire families arriving from Syria. They also do not deal with the problem that 80 percent of those arriving in Germany were previously able to pass through the EU without registration,” said Gottfried Curio, spokesperson for the interior affairs of the AfD parliamentary group. 

The politician emphasized that even after the distribution within the European Union, secondary migration to Germany will continue as long as the will and structures for an effective automatic rejection and deportation system are not created in the country. He added that the people of Brussels maintain false principles, for example, that a person can be a refugee when entering the EU even if he has already traveled through many, many safe third countries. In addition, the EU missed the opportunity to tangibly counterbalance the dramatic overload, especially in Germany, said Gottfried Curio.

At the same time, supposedly conservative governments from Czechia and Italy backed the proposal, which many have portrayed as a betrayal.

https://rmx.news/crime/anger-grows-across-europe-over-eus-mandatory-migrant-quotas/

German Populist AfD Party Overtakes Chancellor Scholz’s Social Democrats in Support

The populist Alternative for Germany party has overtaken the left-wing Social Democrats of Chancellor Olaf Sholz in popular support, as the German government continues to lose ground amid failures on energy, cost of living, and the war in Ukraine.

In the survey conducted by polling institute Forsa, the right-wing populist AfD party has surged for the first time in its history to second place in the rankings of political parties, surpassing Chancellor Scholz’s SPD, which has seen a decline in its support among the populace amid sky-high inflation, soaring energy costs.

According to the weekly trend barometer, Alternative for Germany now enjoys 19 per cent support, compared to the Social Democrat Party at 18 per cent, and its government coalition partners the Greens and the neo-liberal Free Democrats at 14 and 7 per cent respectively, broadcaster NTV reports.

Should an election for the German Bundestag (parliament) occur this week, however, the centre-right Christian Democratic Union of Germany (CDU) and its sister party, the Christian Social Union in Bavaria (CSU), would be the largest party in the country.

If the CDU, which was formerly run by ex-Chacnellor Angela Merkel, form a coalition with the AfD, they would be able to overtake the current coalition government in support.

Yet, at present, this is still unlikely, given that the CDU has, alongside all other major parties, refused to work with the populist party under a so-called “cordon sanitaire” over what the Berlin establishment considers ‘far-right’ positions, particularly on mass migration.

Nevertheless, the rise of the AfD has sent tremours of fear among the political elites in the country, with it signifying that there is growing resentment against the out-of-touch leadership from the ‘traffic light’ coalition government, which has forged ahead with its radical green agenda despite the energy crisis which was borne largely out of disputes with Russia over Ukraine and the destruction of the Nord Stream pipelines. The impact on Germans was compounded by the cost of living crisis, which began in the wake of coronavirus lockdowns and the ensuing breakdown in supply chains.

Rather than addressing the concerns of the people, including mass migration, which has only exacerbated the cost of living crisis, the Berlin establishment has instead argued for a ban on the AfD in order to prevent its rise as a political force in the country.

Last week, the German Institute for Human Rights (DIMR), a progressive organisation fully funded by the government, told parliamentarians that a ban against the AfD would be justified, arguing that the populist party is against the “free democratic basic order” and made the highly incindiary claim that the party’s ideology “is based on the tyranny of National Socialism”.

Speaking to Breitbart London, AfD MEP Dr Gunnar Beck said that although he felt that a ban on the party “would stand no chance” in holding up in court, he said: “The fact that the AfD is not being insulted directly by the state, but by a state-funded association, represents a new chapter in the interventions in the democratic decision-making process.”

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2023/06/15/german-populist-afd-party-overtakes-chancellor-scholz-social-democrats-in-support/

India: Muslim roams around a hospital in a burqa, pretending to be a woman doctor, claims he is gay and was hiding his face to lure men

Source: India TV

On Wednesday, June 14, a bizarre situation unfolded at the Indira Gandhi Government Medical College & Hospital (IGGMCH) in Nagpur when the security guards caught a man roaming around the hospital in a burqa, pretending to be a woman doctor. The accused was identified as 25-year-old Javed Shaikh, a resident of Tajbagh.

The hospital authorities reported the man to the police after his true identity was revealed. Cops from the Tehsil police station reached the spot and arrested the accused. During interrogation, Javed Shaikh said that he was transgender and went to the hospital in a burqa, pretending as a woman doctor, to befriend men.

Dr Sagar Pande, deputy medical superintendent at IGGMCH, said, “Our security personnel had never seen this person before and frankly no doctor goes around hiding their face. We have Muslim female doctors who wear a hijab that covers the head only. But since the burqa was hiding the entire face, security personnel became suspicious.”

“It turned out to be a man. We immediately called the cops because this was definitely a unique situation, a man cross-dressing as a female doctor and roaming in our hospital,” Pande added.

The police revealed that Javed was visiting the hospital posing as a woman doctor for the last 20 days. He wore a burqa and a female doctor’s apron over it and introduced himself as ‘Dr Ayesha Siddiqui’ to the staff and patients.

The police further said that Javed used to primarily focus on male patients. He used to speak to other doctors also frequently, but since he wore a burqa and modulated his voice, no one could identify him.

For the last three-four days, a female security guard named Santoshi, however, found his behaviour to be a little strange. On Wednesday morning, when Javed reached the hospital in the burqa, Santoshi confronted him. She asked him some questions and when her suspicion grew, she urged him to remove the burqa. Javed resisted saying that he was shy to remove the burqa in front of male colleagues.

Santoshi then took Javed to a separate room where she insisted that he removes the burqa. Santoshi was shocked to see a male inside the burqa. She immediately alerted the hospital authorities who in turn phoned the police.

Javed Shaikh was taken into custody and booked under IPC section 171 (impersonation with fraudulent intent), 380 (theft), and 451 (trespass).

Media reports quoted sources in the hospital as saying that Javed had feminine features, and spoke openly about his interest in men. “The man said he was trying to hook up with other men,” a source who was there when Shaikh was stopped at the hospital recalled. In order to try his luck, he would speak with unrelated patients’ family members and get their phone numbers, he added.

Though the police are looking into the homosexual angle, nothing specific to that has been discovered thus far. The Tehsil Police Station’s API S Pandhre stated, “We are investigating that (homosexual) angle as well. But prima facie it seems that Shaikh was there to steal mobile phones.”

https://www.opindia.com/2023/06/nagpur-javed-wears-burqa-poses-as-female-doctor-to-lure-men/

The Left simply goes for the votes, abaya and all

by Giulio Meotti

The Cannes red carpet is the glittering proscenium chosen for protests against femicide and patriarchy. When an actress presented herself veiled, feminists applauded in the name of “inclusion” and the politically correct banality. When the Iranian actress Zahra Amir Ebrahimi then took the floor to say that “women are oppressed in Afghanistan, Iran, Mali and … in the Parisian banlieues”, the awakened sequined conformist of transgression was thrilled. Did he understand what this Iranian woman had just told them?

Now, while in Iran the mullahs confiscate the cars of women who leave the house without a veil, in Europe, which has become an Allah-La-Land, the abaya, the Muslim tunic that covers the whole body, leaving only the face, unlike the Afghan burqa, is the rage. Typical of the countries of the Arabian Peninsula, such as Qatar and Saudi Arabia, the abaya is now rampant in French high schools, where Michel Onfray this week evokes a “low-intensity civil war”.

Le Parisien reveals that Islamic dress is increasingly present in public schools. In a high school in Lyon, a girl says: “Out of 30 girls, 16-18 wear the abaya.” Besides, isn’t Lyon already 30 percent Islamic?

Le Parisien informs readers that in Marseille schools are the scene of attacks in favor of the abaya, defended by left-wing professors.

Coptic Jean Messiha commented: “Halal is spreading. The abaya overwhelms our schools. Burkini our beaches and pools. Clandestine prayers our universities. Apart from that, the Great Replacement and Islamization are still far-right fantasies”.

Someone else replied: “Marseille, c’est la ville des abbayes, pas des abayas”. City of abbeys, not of abayas? Not anymore. Marseille – the second largest city in the country – is today a city where well over 50 percent of the population is African, it is already 30 percent Muslim, the most popular name among those born is Mohammed and synagogues have been transformed into mosques.

“Islamic clothes are proliferating in French schools like an epidemic” writes L’Opinion. The rectorate of Paris has denounced a “significant increase in the use of religious clothes”. Boys in kamis arrive in front of the Aisne schools. In the Oise, there is a boom of veils in front of schools. The regions of Clermont-Ferrand and Bordeaux are also affected.

And what does the left do? It takes up the defense of the abaya.

“We are trying to invent a new polemic to attack Muslims,” says left-wing party France Insoumise deputy Manuel Bompard. Here is the progressive mantra: the real victim is the Muslims. Jean-Luc Mélenchon’s number two speaks of “a disproportionate media echo”. “Le Parisien makes the front page on Muslim women’s dress as multiple crises rock the country,” says MP Mathilde Panot, president of Mélenchon’s parliamentary group.

Charlie Hebdo called her “Gauche (left, ed.) Allahu Akbar”. Of course it takes a lot to go from caviar to abaya.

Macron’s Deputy Solidarity Minister Marlène Shiappa, who appeared in the latest issue of Playboy, had decided to move to the city of Trappes to show attention to cities with a high rate of immigration. He wanted to stop in a bar run by Muslims, “where women are not welcome”. The prefect invited the minister to continue on his way “to avoid an accident”. Schiappa thought he was still in France and not in a 70 percent Islamic city, where submission to Islam is a fait accompli.

Didier Lemaire, the Trappes philosophy professor who, for having denounced the Islamization of his city and having expressed solidarity with Samuel Paty, received death threats, ended up under guard and left teaching, reveals: “Year after year, I see mothers more and more veiled. Before we were dealing with short and colorful veils, now it is a dark dress that hides the whole body and women who refuse to shake hands, it iis a new phenomenon. I began to observe strange behavior after 2015. The girls I saw in class dressed French – skinny jeans, makeup – had become veiled and wore gloves when I saw them in the market. Today we are no longer in France.”

But votes count.

The Jewish philosopher Alain Finkielkraut, one of the leading Parisian intellectuals, says: “The left has taken over the aspirations, aversions and obsessions of this ‘new France’. La France insoumise is, in the era of generalized mystification of vocabulary, the name given to France subject to Islamism”. By faith? No, for clientelism. “It relies on demographic change to gain power.”

“There was a time when Jean-Luc Mélenchon criticized militant religious clothing, wherever it came from,” writes Le Figaro today. “The 2019 ‘March Against Islamophobia’ in which he participated is seen as a turning point.” Anthropologist Florence Bergeaud-Blacker, under guard for death threats, goes so far as to believe that there is “a tacit pact between the left and Islam, which has gotten the Muslim vote by playing on the fear of Islamophobia”.

Paul Melun wrote in the Journal du dimanche on Sunday: “The universities filled up and the factories emptied. This change has been accompanied by a second phenomenon: globalization. In the face of these two great changes, the left has been transformed. It abandoned a proletariat that had become a minority and embraced globalization in the name of opening up to others. The contemporary left has theorized the end of borders as a sign of openness and massive immigration as an insurmountable horizon of Europe. It is working now to seduce new constituents: immigrant populations in the suburbs, compliant with political Islam. Thus the ideal of the left sinks into cynicism and electoral calculation”.

In Marseille, the pro-abaya left won 30 percent in the last presidential elections, while in some districts of Lyon up to 50 percent. In Scotland, the pro-independence left has just entrusted the Muslim Humza Yousaf as prime minister. In Norway, where it governs the Labor Party, Muslims and minorities have become a major force in Parliament. In Brussels half of the electorate of the left is Muslim. When the AfD’s right-wing German parliamentary group called for the introduction of an “International Day against the Persecution of Christians,” the focus on the persecution of Christians by Islamists met with criticism from the SPD, which condemned the “ anti-Islamic tendencies” of this motion.

Similarly, Green Annalena Baerbock, German Foreign Minister, dismissed the veil in Iran thus: “With all due respect to cultural and religious differences, when the police beat a woman to death, that has nothing, absolutely nothing, to do with religion”.

When it comes to Islam, rest assured that the left instinctively knows which side to take.

Not like Bart Drenth, who has just resigned after just six months as director of “Tefaf”, the most important art and antiques fair in the world in Maastricht, Holland. Drenth’s resignation comes days after the Dutch newspaper Telegraaf published an article chronicling his posts critical of Islam.

“Just as with the Iranian revolution, leftist do-gooders stand hand in hand with the jihadists, not knowing that after the success of the revolution they will die first.” Another: “Really, your L+ rights are best protected if you wave Palestinian flags during the Pride parade.” Finally: “Let’s normalize criticism of the Koran and the Prophet.”

Hadn’t they warned him not to tell the truth?

The Left simply goes for the votes, abaya and all | ערוץ 7 (israelnationalnews.com)

Canadian Wildfires: not driven by climate change

By H. Sterling Burnett

Mainstream media mavens in New York City, Washington, D.C., and other major cities on the U.S. East Coast blanketed by smoke from Canada’s wildfires went into overdrive saying the event was unprecedented and provided further proof that catastrophic climate change is occurring.

Whether they were ignorant of the facts and believed what they said or are so far in the bag on climate alarmism they couldn’t let the facts get in the way of another story hyping the purported climate crisis, they were wrong or lying on every count.

Wildfires happen every year throughout the United States and Canada — which is why both countries have designated “wildfire seasons” — and across the globe, but hardly ever get the sustained, nearly apoplectic coverage Canada’s fires got last week. I guess that’s because many major broadcast and print media outlets are on the East Coast and seeing the smoke first-hand, which others experience every year or two, brought the impact of fires home to the horrified journalists.

But experiencing the impacts of fires first-hand doesn’t prove this year’s fires are unusual or caused by climate change, and the evidence shows that they aren’t.

History tells us that smoke from wildfires in Canada have periodically darkened or yellowed the skies on the U.S. East Coast, as they did last week. Indeed, long before anyone used fossil fuels to generate electricity or for transportation the New England Historical Society (NEHS) reports smoke from Canadian wildfires created “yellow” or “dark” days multiple times in the past, in particular: on May 12, 1706; October 21, 1716; August ,9 1732; May 19, 1780; July 3, 1814; November, 6-10, 1819; July 8, 1836; September. 2, 1894; and September 24-30, 1950. So contrary to media reports, last week’s smoke was hardly unprecedented.

Canada’s May 1780 wildfires, delivered so much smoke to the Eastern United States that May 19, 1780 became known as “New England’s Dark Day.” Reports from the time explain the smoke was so bad that candles had to be lit at midday to see.

As was true in the past when smoke from Canadian wildfires was blown into the United States the cause is temporary weather conditions, not climate change. Gunnar Schade, D.Sc., an associate professor with Texas A&M University’s Department of Atmospheric Sciences, says that after hitting the air stream the smoke from Canada’s wildfires was delivered by a “North Central Canadian (Arctic) high-pressure system and a persistent, slow-moving, low-pressure system off the northeast coast [which] combined [to] cause large-scale southerly to southeasterly air movement, which has taken the smoke to the U.S. upper Midwest, southeast and east coast.” When those conditions abated, the smoke dissipated as well.

Not only were this year’s fires not unique, they also did not, as the media stories consistently implied, represent a trend in Canadian wildfires that could be attributed to climate change. One can’t attribute this year’s wildfires to climate change because the evidence shows wildfires in Canada and globally have been declining during the recent period of modest warming. 

Data from Canada’s National Forestry Database for both the entire country as well as the province of Quebec, where many of the recent wildfires occurred, show declining trends for both the number of fires and area burned over the past 31 years. Interestingly, a study by scientists with the Canadian Forest Service attributed the decline in forest fires in Canada over the past few decades to the combined effect of carbon-dioxide fertilization and modestly rising temperatures, which resulted in improved soil moisture conditions. Because plants lose less water via the process of transpiration under conditions of high CO2 and higher temperatures, less moisture is drawn from soil.

To translate, the Canadian Forest Service surmises that climate change, rather than causing more and more severe wildfires, is responsible for the declining trend.

Globally, NASA satellites have also recorded a significant decline in the number of wildfires. In the report “Researchers Detect a Global Drop in Fires,” NASA found, “Globally, the total acreage burned by fires declined 24 percent between 1998 and 2015, according to a new paper published in Science.”

Nor, in its most recent report, does the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change attribute any shift in “fire weather” to climate change, or acknowledge any increase in the number or intensity of wildfires regionally or globally.

Following the science, therefore, one must conclude that climate change is not to blame for the recent fires in Canada or the smoke they delivered to the East Coast.

The fear and actual damage generated by wildfires each year is bad enough without the bought and paid for mainstream media making it worse by encouraging the misdirection of resources from taking actions that address the true causes of wildfires, to the battle against climate change. There is no evidence climate change has or will cause more heatwavesdroughts, or resulting wildfires.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2023/06/canadian_wildfires_not_driven_by_climate_change.html

20 hooded Antifa thugs attack 7 women belonging to patriotic women’s group inside a Swiss restaurant

In the Swiss city of Bern, a group of suspected left-wing extremists assaulted seven women belonging to the French and Swiss conservative women’s group Collectif Némésis inside a restaurant. The female victims report that 20 hooded men attacked the women with chairs, bottles, knives, and pepper spray, resulting in injuries to the women.

In a statement published on Twitter, Collectif Némésis reported that “our activists are traumatized and the restaurant is destroyed.” Earlier in the day, the group had participated in the Swiss women’s strike.

The group also released a video from one of the activists, who spoke while still in the restaurant. In the background, broken glass can be seen, and individuals are sweeping up the glass.

“With Némesis, we had supported the strike of Swiss women, which happens every June. We were in a restaurant to celebrate our action, except we were attacked by some 20 Antifa members who overturned chairs and tables against the window. It sounds stupid, but they threw them pretty hard. After that, they threw tear gas grenades, and a knife was thrown at my face. I was also hit with a bottle of wine on the ear,” the unnamed activist stated.

She then related that the waiters in the restaurant rushed in to defend the women.

“It was quite a violent incident. It was also quite shocking,” said the woman. “We hid under the tables, under the bar, but it was really hyper-dangerous.”

The group also showed the bloodied ear of one of the women. Destroyed furniture and damaged windows can also be seen in the video.

Some prominent feminist activists spoke up over the incident.

“Battered women. A destroyed restaurant. Because they are accused of racism. Because they dare to say that street harassment comes mainly from men from an immigration background. I see few people — except those labeled ED — worrying about the violence that women from Collectif Némésis suffer. Hello, feminists, a little courage. This deafening silence means ‘They had it coming,’” wrote Marguerite Stern, a French women’s rights activist who co-founded Femelliste.

Just this month, Remix News reported on the group, which has become known for sharing testimonials of women who have been sexually assaulted or harassed by men of migrant origin and foreigners.

In video shorts, the women relate how men with an immigration background have assaulted them or attempted to rape them.

“Personally, it is always the Maghrebi types who follow, whistle at and insult me,” says Lea while relating an account of how she was sexually harassed by a large group of North African men.

In another video, a woman relates how she was chased down by a Black male all the way into her apartment building after a long period of sexual harassment in her neighborhood. She recounts how the incident left her traumatized.

Collectif Némésis was founded in Paris in October 2019. According to the group’s own statement, disappointment about the feminist movement were a major motivation in founding the group. The group criticizes feminists who “allegedly represent (women’s) interests,” but instead put “a left-wing ideology above the needs of women.”

The group references numerous other cases of foreigners sexually assaulting European women in a variety of countries.

“We have all made the same observation: The people who attack us daily are mostly non-natives. We created Nemesis because mainstream feminist organizations are very reluctant to talk about cases like the Cologne sexual assaults (caused by people of Middle Eastern or North African origin) or large-scale rape and pimping of female British minors in Rotherham, Telford, Rochdale, Derby, Oxford, etc. (organized exclusively by members of the Indo-Pakistani community). But also because street harassment is mainly the work of men from a different culture, and feminist associations try to hide this fact by masking our very concrete problems with abstract concepts such as ‘patriarchy.’”

https://rmx.news/crime/20-hooded-antifa-thugs-attack-7-women-belonging-to-patriotic-womens-group-inside-a-swiss-restaurant/

White House Declines to Condemn UK for Restricting ‘Puberty Blockers’ for ‘Trans Kids’

White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre dodged a question Wednesday on whether the administration intends to condemn the United Kingdom (UK) for a decision to ban “puberty blockers” for “transgender kids.”

As Breitbart News reported last week:

Britain’s National Health Service will no longer routinely prescribe puberty blockers to children amid concerns over a lack of evidence on the impact of the so-called gender-affirming drugs.

In what is being described as a historical moment, the UK’s state healthcare provider will no longer be prescribing children with life-altering puberty blockers except in exceptional cases or in the context of clinical research.

[F]amilies and children will be “strongly discouraged” from seeking to acquire puberty-blocking drugs from unregulated sources or on the internet.

A reporter first asked Jean-Pierre about comments that President Joe Biden made last week in a joint press conference with UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, saying that states limiting access to puberty-blocking drugs and gender reassignment surgery for children were motivated by “prejudice” and cruelty, not concern for kids.

The reporter asked whether Biden might withhold Medicare funds from those states. Jean-Pierre said she had no information about any such decision. The reporter then asked about the fact that the UK changed its policy just days after the press conference. “Will the president raise this human rights issue with his counterpart?”

Jean-Pierre declined to answer directly, saying she had not seen “those comments directly,” and that she would “go beyond what the president said.” She did not add whether the UK ban was “prejudiced” or cruel.

It is not clear what defines a “trans child,” nor is there consensus on age of consent for transgender drugs or surgery.

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2023/06/14/white-house-declines-to-condemn-uk-for-banning-puberty-blockers-for-transgender-kids/