Europeans don’t realize ‘one day they will become a minority in their own countries,’ warns best-selling South African writer Ernst Roets in interview with Hungarian media

In this Monday, July 12, 2021, looters stand outside a shopping center alongside a burning barricade in Durban, South Africa. Former President Jacob Zuma’s incarceration for contempt of court sparked the worst violence South Africa has seen since the nation achieved democracy in 1994. Screen grab youtube

South African writer and filmmaker Ernst Roets said in an interview with Hungarian media that he is surprised by how open Europeans are to mass immigration. He warns that the demographic consequences will be enormous, including Europeans becoming a minority in their own countries.

“From South Africa, we were surprised to look at Europe, at how open the countries are and how some people just accept immigrants, not realizing that one day they will become a minority in their own country,” said Roets to Hungarian newspaper Magyar Nemzet

“When that happens, it will be too late. That’s why I said before that demographics are key: The diverse culture, the wonderful theaters, the entertainment, the universities and everything else are useless if the demographics are declining. And I think that’s especially true for Europeans and Americans who don’t recognize their importance in this demographic.”

Roets, who also serves as the deputy CEO of AfriForum, which advocates for the rights of Boers in South Africa, says he speaks from experience. As a member of South Africa’s Boer community, he has observed firsthand the brutal manner in which White people are increasingly treated in South African society, with the violence rising in tandem with Whites losing political power and dwindling further into minority status. The shift in power has translated into hostile discrimination, and in some cases, even outright murder, including members of Roets’ family.

In fact, the violent crime directed at the Boer population is one of the major factors that motivated Roets to write his book on the situation in South Africa, the international bestseller “Kill the Boer: Government Complicity in South Africa’s Brutal Farm Murders,” which has recently been translated into Hungarian.

When I wrote my book, I started with these reports to emphasize how big a problem it is. Besides, it’s part of my job to help victims. I know many victims. I met many of them after the attacks, but in order to understand the seriousness of the problem, I also need to talk about those I knew before they became victims of brutal attacks. I can name quite a few people who were killed on their farms, along with family members and friends who became survivors. I had a friend in high school who left home at night and suddenly someone shot him in the head while on the phone. My father’s cousin was brutally murdered; they started beating him with stones and then pierced his skull with a pitchfork.

The victims of one of the most brutal farm murders were the parents of one woman I knew. They tied ropes around their necks and dragged them up and down the house. The woman’s father was murdered by pushing a shower head down his throat and shooting hot water into his stomach, causing severe internal burns. He was eventually shot dead with a shotgun.

And these are just a few cases out of many. Some were burned to death with torches, some were tied to the back of the car and dragged until they died, others had machetes pressed to their throats, others were dismembered. It’s horrible how creative the killers are. 

Roets dedicated his book to the memory of Wilmien Potgieter, who was just two years old when she and her entire family were murdered. The little girl had returned home with her family when the father was attacked, stabbed 151 times with a pitchfork, a knife and a machete, and then left to die in the garden with a pitchfork sticking in his neck. The murder took place in front of the wife and the daughter, with the little girl shot before her own mother, after which, the mother was dragged from the house, made to kneel, and also shot.

“It’s so horrible you don’t even want to think about it, but there are also more stories involving children,” said Roets.

Whites are increasingly self-reliant in South Africa

Roets describes the various problems the minority Boer community faces in South Africa, including intense levels of discrimination, which Roets says is born out of envy. Despite this discrimination, the White community has far better outcomes in many cases.

“In my opinion, our government is not really efficient and incompetent, but our community is quite successful, and this is where the conflict comes from, i.e., envy. At the same time, part of the problem is that the government tries to use us as scapegoats and blames us for the country’s problems,” he said.

The South African says that one of the fundamental areas of conflict is between the different outcomes of the Black community and the Boers.

“Let’s look at the statistics. In Hungary, there are 0.8 murders per 100,000 people per year; worldwide, I think the average is around six. However, most criminologists say that the situation is the worst in South Africa, which is why the country is called the capital of murder. More than 20,000 murders are committed in the country every year.

Then, according to some analysts, the South African education system is the worst, about 80 percent of the country’s schools are dysfunctional. On the other hand, our community has very good schools, universities, and private universities, which are on the same level as European institutions. Another problem is unemployment, which depends on how you measure it, but it is around 40 percent, but in our community, it is only around 8 percent. There are clear differences in the listed areas: While in the rest of the country there are successive failures, we record successes one after the other.

Decades after White rule was ended in South Africa, the country is in shambles, with widespread theft and corruption at all levels of government, along with a breakdown in public services, including the most basic ones such as electricity and trash collection.

“Now, one of the biggest problems is electricity, in which the government has a monopoly, so only the government can supply electricity, but this does not happen in practice. There is no electricity for several hours a day. There is a phone application, through which we can track when there will be a power outage, for example, tomorrow between two and five in the afternoon,” Roets said.

He said that the Boer communities are installing their own solar panels to generate their own electricity and taking other measures to increase independence, including setting up entirely self-run institutions.

He said that the general situation for the Boers is “very good and very bad at the same time.” 

“It is very bad because the South African system is on the verge of collapse and there are no signs that the country will recover from this crisis. And the number of protests about the state of public debt, corruption, crime, and education is on the rise. All indicators indicate that the country is heading in the wrong direction. We have built institutions within our community, thereby also protecting ourselves. If the state fails, we have to survive. We have our own schools, universities, cultural organizations and economic organizations. We have more than 20 community institutions, which cannot solve all the problems, but they help us survive.

Who are the Boers?

Many are still unaware of what the Boer community actually is, with Roets saying they are also known as Afrikaners, which is a cultural community mainly from South Africa, but which has roots in the Dutch, German, and French populations who settled in South Africa.

“But we also consider ourselves Africans because of our identity. So, we are no longer Dutch, German, or French, we are a separate nation with close ties to Africa and the West. In South Africa, a new government was established in the 1990s, and at that time the ideology spread that we could all give up our own cultural identity and thus become the same. This process was valid not only for us, but also for other communities, but it did not work.”

Roets says that he is overall an optimist and believes the situation for the Boers will improve, but says he also has to be realistic. He said that although the situation is bad, and more and more Boers are leaving the country, they have remained resilient.

“Our culture is strong, our sense of identity is strong. We want to survive. That’s a lot of us, about 2.7 million of us,” he said. “Like the Hungarians, we live scattered, but in an even larger area than the Hungarians, and we are a minority everywhere.”

He said that Boers need to start living closer together until they are the majority in a certain area of South Africa. He said that in the meantime, representatives from South Africa’s Boer community are trying to raise awareness about the situation they are facing, especially with an international audience:

“We know people will be poorer, we know they will be angrier and angrier at the South African government, and we know they will blame us for more failures as the government becomes more and more incompetent. Corruption and crime will grow, and the situation in the country will become even worse. Our institutions, on the other hand, are becoming stronger and stronger, while I see a political vacuum emerging. People leave the ruling party, but they don’t want to stand behind the opposition either. In a certain sense, it is an exaggeration, but according to some points of view, we are entering a post-state society: the state is collapsing, but there is no alternative solution to replace it. I don’t know if that will happen, but I think it might.”

Although Roets’ warnings may seem alarmist to some, demographic transformation is well underway in Europe and has been for decades. As Remix News has previously reported, now one-in-five French newborns have Muslim names, countries like Norway and the U.K. are predicted to have a minority native population in the next decades, and many European cities have already crossed this tipping point in recent years.

https://rmx.news/article/europeans-dont-realize-one-day-they-will-become-a-minority-in-their-own-countries-warns-best-selling-south-african-writer-ernst-roets-in-interview-with-hungarian-media/

Trans Tyranny: Christian British Teacher Banned from Profession After Calling Students ‘Girls’ in Classroom

Screen grab twitter

Regulators in Britain have banned a Christian teacher from the profession for life for “misgendering” a student, in what is believed to be the first case of its kind in the country.

The Teaching Regulation Authority (TRA) has ruled that Joshua Sutcliffe, 33, formerly of the Cherwell School at Oxford, should be banned from the teaching profession for failing to use the so-called preferred pronouns of a girl student who identified as a boy, which they claimed amounted to not providing the pupil with “dignity and respect”.

Sutcliffe admitted that there was an instance in which he praised a group of students by saying “well done girls” during a maths lesson, which apparently was enough for a student to feel misgendered. Regulators claimed that it was likely that there were other instances of the teacher not using preferred pronouns, however, Sutcliffe had denied these charges, The Telegraph reported.

In addition, the TRA also found the former mathematics teacher guilty of misconduct for expressing his faith-based opposition to gay marriage and for showing students at a different school video with “inappropriate comments” about the problems of declining masculinity in the modern world.

“The panel was satisfied that the conduct of Mr Sutcliffe fell significantly short of the standard of behaviour expected of a teacher,” the ruling from the regulators stated.

The TRA’s Alan Meyrick, who made the decision to impose the ban on the teacher, said: “In my view, it is necessary to impose a prohibition order in order to maintain public confidence in the profession.”

The chief executive of the Christian Legal Centre, which has supported Mr Sutcliffe’s case, Andrea Williams said: “This is a tipping point. The government needs to step in and restore some sanity into the teaching profession. Similar action needs to be taken regarding the Teaching Regulation Agency.

“I am very concerned by the way regulatory bodies are now punishing Christian teachers simply for stating the truth.

“The Christian viewpoint on sexual ethics and morality is no longer being tolerated in the classroom and teachers who openly express it are having their ability to teach removed by the regulatory body. This is serious and sinister.

For his part, Mr Sutcliffe said: “I am devastated by the panel’s ruling and will appeal.

“Based on this ruling, every teacher is at risk if they share their beliefs and views in the classroom. If a teacher had shown or recommended a video from a liberal YouTube platform, would they have been treated as I have?

“I believe affirming children who is in gender distress in the classroom is psychologically damaging for them. I refuse to go against my conscience and cause a child harm and cannot apologise for that.

“Indoctrinating children across the country to celebrate and promote Pride, to fly the Pride flag is celebrated, but if Christian beliefs are raised or expressed in the classroom, you face having your career and life torn apart.

“I have been bullied and pursued and have had every part of my life scrutinised for expressing my Christian faith and biological truth.”

As a result of the ruling, Sutcliffe will be banned from teaching in perpetuity, however, he can apply for the ban to be rescinded in 2025.

Trans Tyranny: Christian Teacher Banned from Profession After Calling Students ‘Girls’ in Classroom (breitbart.com)

Dutch Museum Renowned for Egyptology Collection Displays Fake ‘Africanized’ King Tut – “I think you really have to give it a chance”

(King Tut, the actual one.)

“Fake News”. “Disinformation”. “Selective Facts”.

What’s reality anyway?

What did the ancient Egyptians look like? A new exhibition at National Museum of Antiquities in Leiden, the Netherlands, has sparked controversy by including a contemporary artwork that appears to depict the Pharaoh Tutankhamun as Black.

“Kemet: Egypt in Hip-Hop, Jazz, Soul and Funk” pairs Egyptian antiquities from the museum’s collection with work inspired by ancient Egyptian culture by created by musicians of the African diaspora, including Miles Davis, Erykah Badu, Beyoncé, and Rihanna.

The National Museum of Antiquities is renowned for its Egyptology collection. This is not some modern art museum pulling this stunt.

It’s one thing when Netflix decides to africanize Cleopatra, but a museum doing this is very consciously blurring the line between fact and fiction in a time when reality is already under siege and quite a few of their patrons have a loose grip on actual history.

“This is a very difficult topic and that is the thing with this exhibition: I think you really have to give it a chance,” Daniel Soliman, museum’s Egyptian and Nubian curator, told The Art Newspaper. “There are Egyptians, or Egyptians in the diaspora, who believe that the pharaonic heritage is exclusively their own. The topic of the imagination of ancient Egypt in music, predominantly from the African diaspora, Black artists in different styles, jazz, soul, funk, hip-hop, had long been ignored.”

Jazz has nothing to do with ancient Egypt. African-American musical styles did not come out of ancient Egypt. The ancient Egyptians are extinct. They were not African. And Egypt is currently an Arab country.

Talking about the “imagination of ancient Egypt” is a topic for a bad pop culture studies paper, not something that a museum should be flirting with. But the Tumblr fantasies of 2003 became the academic journals of 2013 and now the formal institutional reality of 2023.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/museum-renowned-for-egyptology-collection-displays-fake-africanized-king-tut/

Dutch conservative Geert Wilders received more death threats last year than all other Dutch politicians combined

Geert Wilders, the leader of the right-wing Party for Freedom (PVV) in the Netherlands, received hundreds of substantial threats on his life last year — more than every other Dutch politician combined.

The Public Prosecution Service revealed on Monday that authorities received 1,125 reports last year from politicians regarding death threats, a new record and almost twice more than the previous year.

Of that figure, approximately 600 threats were targeted at Wilders, a Dutch conservative politician who has long been an outspoken critic of Islamic extremism, using his platform to warn of the dangers of mass immigration and failed social and cultural integration.

Many threats directed at Wilders originate from Pakistan, according to the public prosecutor’s office, but with the absence of a judicial agreement treaty with the country to initiate further investigations, successful prosecution is problematic.

One such example relates to ex-Pakistan international cricketer, Khalid Latif, who was charged by the Dutch public prosecutor’s office last month for allegedly trying to incite people to murder Wilders.

Dutch prosecutors requested the assistance of Pakistani authorities to serve the summons on Latif, who has been ordered to appear in court in Amsterdam on Aug. 29 for charges of attempting to incite murder, sedition, and threats.

Without an extradition treaty, however, the chances of his attendance are slim to none.

Of the reports recorded last year, a total of 889 cases were considered to be legitimate threats deserving of prosecution; however, the medium of social media where a majority of these threats occur under anonymity is making the growing issue increasingly more difficult to contain.

Due to the lack of cooperation from social media platforms to provide information about suspects, a total of 712 cases had to be discontinued by the public prosecutor’s office.

Just 37 cases last year resulted in a criminal conviction, although 127 cases are still ongoing.

https://rmx.news/netherlands/dutch-conservative-geert-wilders-received-more-death-threats-last-year-than-all-other-dutch-politicians-combined/

WATCH: Muslim activists storm Birmingham cinema screening ‘The Kerala Story’

Image Source: Mint

Muslim activists in Birmingham stormed a screening of the controversial Bollywood film ‘The Kerala Story‘, starring Adah Sharma, which has sparked a row in India amid claims that it destroys ‘religious harmony’, media reports said.

A group of protesters led by Shakeel Afsar, a Kashmiri activist, disrupted the screening of ‘The Kerala Story’ on Friday at a Cineworld theatre in Birmingham, Daily Mail reported.

A 10-minute clip uploaded on the British Muslim news website ‘5Pillars’ showed Afsar, 35, with a group of demonstrators entering the cinema and causing the film to be paused.

In the clip, Afsar along with at least two others ask to speak to the cinema manager about the ‘Islamophobic’ nature of the film.

The staff at the Cineworld were forced to pause the screening as mayhem broke out, with audience members seen confronting the activists and telling them to leave, Daily Mail reported.

After the activists were ejected by the security personnel, a theatre attendant could be heard telling the audience: “If you want to watch this film, you should calm down first. I am going to resume this film. We’re trying to deal with this in the best way we can. We’ve paused the film, we’ve turned the lights on, we’ve called the police.”

Last year, Afsar, an entrepreneur and property developer, led a campaign to pull ‘The Lady of Heaven’ from the cinemas.

He was also banned from protesting outside a primary school in Birmingham in 2019 after demonstrating against the teaching of LGBT values, Daily Mail reported.

https://www.outlookindia.com/art-entertainment/-the-kerala-story-muslim-activists-storm-birmingham-cinema-screening-of-adah-sharma-s-rs-200-crore-grosser-film-news-288504 / https://www.firstpost.com/world/watch-muslim-activists-storm-birmingham-cinema-screening-the-kerala-story-12635812.html

Sweden: Two Syrians plotted attack on church

Wikimedia Commons, Copyright © Roar Johansen, CC BY-SA 3.0

Two Syrian brothers plotted to commit an attack with explosives on a church. No details were given on the exact target of the attack. Both brothers are now in custody.

The target was an unspecified church in Sweden, where people should have gathered at the time of the planned attack. Investigators did not disclose further details. The two Syrians, who arrived in Germany separately in 2015, are in custody in Hamburg.

The two men are accused of preparing a serious act of violence threatening the state. Initially, investigators had only assumed terrorism financing and aiding and abetting a planned explosives attack, as they had not known of a specific target for the attack.

The two men were already arrested at the end of April for the planned attack with an explosive belt, but an arrest warrant was only issued for the older of the two brothers. Now, however, the younger one has also been arrested, as investigators have discovered that he was much more involved in the crime than initially thought. He helped his older brother with the preparations and obtained materials to manufacture the explosives.

During a search of the home of the two, as well as several contacts of the brothers, investigators found extensive evidence such as chemicals and cell phones. The investigation is ongoing.

https://exxpress.at/zwei-syrer-planten-anschlag-auf-kirche/

‘This is basically Apartheid!’ London theater slammed for urging White people not to attend play for Black-only audience

Theatre Royal Stratford East, Sbrooks91, Wikimedia Commons, CC-BY-SA-4.0

A London theater has received widespread criticism for promoting one showing of a play which the venue urges White people not to attend.

The Theatre Royal Stratford East has organized a “Black Out” night on July 5 for the production of “Tambo & Bones,” a play described as a “racially charged metatheatrical satire.”

The play runs for a month during June and July, but on this date alone White people have been informed they are not welcome to attend.

While insisting on its website that “no one is excluded from attending,” the venue adds that “this performance has been arranged for Black audience members specifically” and states that the production should be enjoyed “free from the White gaze.”

Director Matthew Xia justified the discriminatory move by claiming Black people need “private and safe spaces” away from White people in order to “experience productions that explore complex, nuanced race-related issues.”

In its FAQs, the venue states the production is for a “Black-identifying” audience, before comprising a list of who it considers to be Black enough to attend.

“We define ‘Black’ as of Black African, Caribbean, Afro-Latinx and African-American heritage, including those of mixed-Black heritage who identify as such.”

The move has sparked outrage with critics warning it sets a dangerous precedent and is overtly discriminatory.

“Britain is becoming like pre-civil-rights America: segregation and division on the grounds of race. Welcome to progressivism,” tweeted trade unionist and broadcaster Paul Embrery.

Leader of Britain’s Reclaim party, Laurence Fox, remarked: “I’m so excited to see this production. If it means I have to go in blackface so that everyone feels safe. That’s a price I’m willing to pay.”

The Don’t Divide Us campaign commented that while it doesn’t consider the move to be a dangerous precedent, it did believe it to be “a very stupid and philistine one.”

“Everyone has a unique response to a work of art. We don’t need segregated audiences for that. And psychological exploration is best done in private therapy, not public theater,” it added.

Teacher and education reformer Katharine Birbalsingh CBE tweeted tongue-in-cheek: “Because the trauma from ‘the white gaze’ is too much for us black people. That’s how weak we are. We can’t take white people paying for a ticket to see our production because their evil eyes are set upon us.”

Britain’s first Black police and crime commissioner, Festus Akinbusoye, also condemned the move.

“Society is richer and stronger when an understanding of each other’s cultures and stories are shared and heard. However, I believe the Black Out concept runs contrary to this education and enrichment ethos,” he said.

This isn’t the first time a “Black Out” night has caused controversy.

In February, the National Arts Center in Canada was subject to accusations of segregation and discrimination for doing the same thing with a production of “Is God Is.”

The phenomenon of Black-only events appears to be seeping into Western society, with a yoga workshop at Canada’s University of Guelph making headlines in November last year for prohibiting the admission of all races other than Black.

https://rmx.news/uk/this-is-basically-apartheid-london-theater-slammed-for-urging-white-people-not-to-attend-play-for-black-only-audience/

Unassisted Suicide – The Catholic Church risks killing its own moral credibility

 Presidencia El Salvador, Wikimedia Commons , CC-Zero

Recent remarks from the president of the Vatican’s Pontifical Academy for Life indicate that the Catholic Church continues to pivot away from defending the most vulnerable in their earliest and latest stages of existence.

Cardinal Vincenzo Paglia told an Italian journalism conference April 21 that for the sake of preserving the common societal good, the church would accept laws supporting assisted suicide.

“It cannot be excluded that in our society, a legal mediation is practicable that allows assisted suicide,” said Paglia, alluding to a judgement in 2019 from Italy’s Constitutional Court outlining limited conditions for assisted suicide. Patients must be “kept alive by life-sustaining treatments and suffering from an irreversible pathology, a source of physical or psychological suffering that he considers intolerable, but fully capable of making free and informed decisions,” it states.

The cardinal then referenced a bill the Italian Parliament is considering to expand those conditions.

“The bill approved by the Chamber of Deputies basically went along these lines,” Paglia said. “Personally, I would not practice assisting suicide, but I understand that legal mediation can constitute the greatest common good concretely possible in the conditions in which we find ourselves.”

One week before Paglia’s remarks, the Netherlands announced it approved euthanasia for children younger than 12.

Paglia’s comments drew immediate criticism. The John Paul II Academy for Human Life and the Family, which has no connection to the Vatican, demanded his resignation. Damian Thompson, who covers the Catholic Church for The Spectator in Britain, referred to the cardinal’s previous remarks on abortion in this scathing tweet:

“This Pontifical Academy of Death strikes again. It doesn’t matter what clarifications Paglia issues; the fact that he says this stuff openly illustrates the theological chaos of the Bergoglio pontificate.”

As FrontPage Magazine reported in September, Paglia stated that the church would not oppose Italy’s Law 194, which legalized abortions in the first trimester and permits them afterward only if the mother’s life is in danger or if the fetus shows “serious abnormalities or malformations,” the law states.

“I believe at this point that Law 194 is a pillar of our social life,” he said in August. When pressed whether the law was up for debate, he replied, “No, absolutely not.”

Tommaso Scandroglio, reporter for the Catholic newspaper La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana, perfectly described the impact: “It is as if the president of the Jewish Anti-Defamation League is declaring himself in favor of the Holocaust.”

Paglia’s remarks on assisted suicide not only contradict Catholic teaching but also Pope Francis’ public statements. The church’s catechism calls euthanasia “murder.”

“Thus an act or omission which, of itself or by intention, causes death in order to eliminate suffering constitutes a murder gravely contrary to the dignity of the human person and to the respect due to the living God, his Creator,” the catechism elaborates. “The error of judgment into which one can fall in good faith does not change the nature of this murderous act, which must always be forbidden and excluded.”

The catechism also precludes assisted suicide, even if a patient requests it.

“Even if death is thought imminent, the ordinary care owed to a sick person cannot be legitimately interrupted,” it says. “The use of painkillers to alleviate the sufferings of the dying, even at the risk of shortening their days, can be morally in conformity with human dignity if death is not willed as either an end or a means, but only foreseen and tolerated as inevitable Palliative care is a special form of disinterested charity. As such it should be encouraged.”

In a general audience 15 months before Paglia’s remarks on assisted suicide, Francis said the following:

“We must accompany people towards death, but not provoke death or facilitate any form of suicide. Remember that the right to care and treatment for all must always be prioritized, so that the weakest, particularly the elderly and the sick, are never rejected. Life is a right, not death, which must be welcomed, not administered.”

So why does Paglia still have his position?

Francis is applying the tactics of Fabian socialists to ignite the doctrinal change he desires. Francis’ public support for historic teaching mollifies inattentive Catholics. But his unwillingness to discipline favored subordinates who state diametrically opposed positions reveals his true intentions.

Indeed, those subordinates are the tools Francis uses to expedite his desired changes.

Take abortion, as FrontPage Magazine has reported in depth. On the one hand, Francis equated procuring an abortion to “hiring a hitman,” the catechism describes abortion as a “moral evil,” and canon law demands Catholics who persist “in manifest grave sin are not to be admitted to holy communion…without previous sacramental confession.”

Nevertheless, the Vatican’s official newspaper, L’Osservatore Romano, offered a tepid response to the Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. Wade in June. An editorial defined the issue as “a question of developing political choices that promote conditions … in favor of life” by “ensuring adequate sexual education, guaranteeing health care accessible to all and preparing legislative measures … overcoming existing inequalities.”

More importantly, the head of the Vatican’s highest theological body dissuaded American bishops in 2011 from withholding communion from Catholic politicians who support abortion. Those politicians include two of Francis’ favorites: Joe Biden, the virtual president, and Rep. Nancy Pelosi, the former House speaker. Both support Francis’ primary focus on environmental sustainability and economic redistribution.

“It would be misleading to give the impression that abortion and euthanasia alone constitute the only grave matters of Catholic moral and social teaching that demand the fullest level of accountability on the part of Catholics,” wrote Cardinal Luis Ladaria, the prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

Like Paglia, Ladaria retains his position. So does Bologna Cardinal Matteo Zuppi, considered a possible papal successor, who called Law 194 “an important secular solution, so much so, I think, that nobody intends to call it into question.”

Take gender ideology, as FrontPage Magazine also reported in depth. Though Francis has called it “ideological colonization,” and Ladaria’s body denied German bishops in 2021 the authority to bless same-sex unions, Francis endorses three subordinates who support them: the Rev. James Martin, San Diego Cardinal Robert McElroy and Luxembourg Cardinal Jean-Claude Hollerich.

Martin, one of Francis’ communications advisors, uses his various platforms to promote gender ideology, including transgender surgery for children. McElroy called for “radical inclusion” of all LGBTQ Catholics, regardless of whether they repent from homosexual sex, which both the catechism and the Bible call immoral.

Hollerich, whom Francis appointed to his circle of closest advisors in March, even said he rejects church teaching on homosexuality. Martin, a fellow Jesuit, went so far as to question “whether the biblical judgement is correct.”

All three men’s positions reflect a trending view among Francis’ acolytes in Catholic leadership: Moral doctrine depends on human consensus, not divine revelation, as Paglia stated at the journalism conference.

“The Catholic Church does not have a package of ready-to-wear, ready-made truths, as if it were a distributor of pills of truth,” he said. “Theological thought evolves in history, in dialogue with the Magisterium and with the experience of the People of God in a dynamic of mutual enrichment.

“The Church’s intervention and witness, inasmuch as she too participates in public, intellectual, political and juridical debate, is situated on the level of culture and dialogue between consciences. The contribution of Christians is given within the different cultures, neither above – as if they possessed a truth given a priori – nor below – as if believers were bearers of a respectable opinion, but detached from history. Between believers and non-believers, there is a relationship of mutual learning.”

A professor of moral theology at St. Joseph’s Seminary in Yonkers, N.Y., the Rev. Thomas Berg, strongly disagrees.

“That’s a sad caricature of how we come to know moral truth. Missing words from Paglia’s remarks: Jesus, Gospel, grace, intrinsic evil,” Berg tweeted before issuing his ultimate rebuke to Paglia:

“His idiotic remarks serve zero purpose in the cause of defending the dignity of human life and overcoming throw-away culture.”

Yet those remarks serve a fundamental purpose in Francis’ cause of remolding the Catholic Church into an ally of secularist, materialist, globalist utopians.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/unassisted-suicide/