Month: March 2023
Neil Oliver: Many are speculating that a final and catastrophic CRASH is coming for the banks…
ISIS calls on Muslims in Sweden and all of Europe to attack the ‘Crusaders with bloodshed and rent off body parts’
Here’s What Will Happen If Trump Is Arrested Next Week
According to recent reports, law enforcement and security agencies at the local, state, and federal levels are getting ready for a possible indictment of former President Donald Trump as soon as next week.
These agencies are carrying out preliminary security assessments and deliberating over potential security arrangements around the Manhattan Criminal Court situated at 100 Centre Street. The discussion revolves around the chance that Trump may be charged with an alleged hush-money payment to Stormy Daniels and could travel to New York to face the charges if any.
As PJ Media’s Robert Spencer noted on Friday, it appears that the upcoming preparations for Donald Trump’s arrest are being designed to maximize their impact on the media. The intention is not just to arrest Trump but to handcuff and perp-walk him, creating a highly sensationalized event.
This should come as no surprise, especially considering the pre-dawn raid of Roger Stone’s home in 2019, complete with CNN on the scene, and the unprecedented raid of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago last year. So far, nothing the radical left has done has managed to stop Trump from being legally able or politically viable enough to seek the presidency again, and it’s reasonable to see how those who have been trying to get Trump for something would resort to political theatrics and create a media spectacle.
But what will happen if this actually takes place? Indicting Trump alone over ridiculous charges would backfire dramatically on the left, but a made-for-TV-crime-drama with Trump as the star would most certainly take the word “backfire” to a new level.
That’s not according to me; that’s according to Elon Musk.
“If this happens, Trump will be re-elected in a landslide victory,” Musk tweeted in response to a report about the potential pending arrest.
It’s not yet clear if this arrest will happen, but for what it’s worth, Stormy Daniels has not had a lot of luck in her litigious grudge against Trump. In 2018, she was ordered to pay nearly $300,000 after her defamation suit against Trump failed spectacularly. But if we assume for a moment that it does happen, I think Elon Musk is right.
Radical left-wing public officials have been trying for years to indict him for something, abusing their positions of power to launch investigations in search of a crime. Last year after the unprecedented raid on Mar-a-Lago, Trump’s approval ratings went up, not down. When Democrats impeached Trump over a phone call, his approval ratings also went up.
”Prior to 2016, if a candidate had a pending or actual indictment, it would be a huge blow to their credibility and almost certainly the end of their candidacy, because we assumed it was legitimate,” former Trump campaign lawyer Jenna Ellis noted on Twitter. “Now, because of the Democrats, no reasonable American trusts the legitimacy of federal law enforcement. Nor should they.”
Americans react accordingly when they see blatant abuses of power, and if Democrats insist on abusing the justice system to carry out their partisan grudge against Trump, they, not Trump, will pay the political price.
What the heck is going on in Europe?
By Andrea Widburg
During four days on the road driving to and from New Orleans, in addition to Matt Walsh, Michael Knowles, and other conservative podcasts, we listened to a Matt Graves podcast entitled “Le Monstre,” about a Belgian psychopath who kidnapped six girls, killing four. The case exposed the rot in Belgium’s equivalent of the FBI but, most strikingly, it suggested a pedophile trafficking ring that Belgium authorities wanted to cover up. I was already going to recommend the podcast, but I’ll now augment it with a crazy and, it’s possible, entirely false series of accusations out of France, also allegedly involving high-level pedophiles.
Forbes summarized the Le Monstre podcast, which came out last year:
In June of 1995, two eight-year-old Belgian girls, Julie Lejeune and Mélissa Russo, disappeared while playing in their neighborhood of Liège. Their kidnapping and murders were eventually linked to the serial killer, pedophile and kidnapper Marc Dutroux, who later became known as “Le Monstre.” Dutroux and his accomplices were responsible for the abduction and murder of multiple young women in Belgium. The lack of action from local and Federal authorities in Belgium created a sense of mistrust and formed conspiracy theories as to why certain DNA evidence was never fully explored. After Dutroux’s arrest, 400,000 Belgians took to the streets in a protest which ultimately reformed the country’s justice system.
Graves does a wonderful job of exploring all the details. It’s clear that he believes that, as in England with Jimmy Saville, there’s a high-level pedophile trafficking ring in Belgium. Also, it appears that the Belgium Gendarmerie was either hopelessly inept or, like the FBI, working to cover up a pedophile problem in Belgium. Frankly, if it weren’t for revelations about Jeffrey Epstein and Jimmy Saville, I might have been inclined to think that was a crazy conspiracy theory, but now—well, it strikes me as entirely possible.
All of which brings me to a strange story from France that The Vigilant Citizen caught. There are two big caveats before I begin. First, everything I’m about to relate is an unproven allegation. Second, the anonymous person behind The Vigilant Citizen has one perspective: The most powerful people across the west are all into devil worship and pedophilia (and s/he often brings some powerful receipts).
Years ago, I would have dismissed all this. Now we know, though, that some among the rich and powerful in America embrace pedophilia. Plus, we’ve learned that federal law enforcement exists to protect the powerful, not the people. Therefore, it’s all too easy to take seriously the following allegations.
Allegedly, in February, Pierre Palmade, a well-known French comedian, smashed into a car, leading to the death of a pregnant woman’s baby. It turned out that Palmade had young male prostitutes in the car and was hopped up on drugs. Soon after, people who knew Palmade said he enjoyed pedophilic porn, so he is now being investigated.
So far, fairly typical. It’s what happened on a popular French show called Touche Pas à Mon Poste (TPMP) that gets strange. One of the guests was Gérard Fauré, who self-identifies as someone who was a drug dealer to the stars in past years. Today, he makes his living publishing controversial books alleging that those same people, mostly politicians and entertainers, engaged in illegal activity: “The charges include massive consumption of drugs (mainly cocaine), sexual abuse, rape, pedophilia, child molestation, child trafficking, murders, and assassinations.”
Anyway, when appearing on TPMP, Fauré alleged that he attended a party at Palmade’s house and that, along with drugs, Palmade had young boys and “adrenochrome” at the house. Adrenochrome comes from oxidized adrenaline and, according to many theories, especially from the now-defunct QANON, comes from children’s blood. The left characterizes this theory as a new antisemitic blood libel, which may be true. Certainly, the West has more than its fair share of antisemites.
Fauré accused several well-known people (and many, including the most prominent of them, are not Jewish) of being adrenochrome addicts and said they got the blood from children as part of a pedophile obsession. He included President Macron in the list. TPMP instantly shut him down. The entire French media, including TPMP itself, immediately disavowed Fauré’s words. The government will heavily fine TPMP, and politicians are talking about not renewing its license in 2025, effectively shutting it down.
Again, I don’t pretend to believe any of Palmade’s claims, and I don’t know anything about adrenochrome use or whether this is a modern antisemitic blood libel. What’s interesting is the pedophilia part, and that’s because something bad is happening in the west: Epstein, Saville, the pornographic sexuality being pushed into schools via the medium of so-called “transgenderism,” the Balenciaga ad campaign, the possibility of a vast child trafficking ring in Belgium and, now, Palmade’s alleged porn collection and Fauré’s pedophile allegations all suggest that the child sacrifice part of pre-Biblical pagan religions may be making a comeback. This is what happens in a defiantly post-Christian world.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2023/03/what_the_heck_is_going_on_in_europe.html
Britain Must NOT Give Elgin Marbles to Greece. Museums Must NOT Return Artefacts
Muslim Cop Helped Terrorists Kill 41 in Moscow Subway
A military court in Moscow has sentenced a high-ranking police official from Kizlyar, Dagestan, to life in prison.
Colonel Gazi Isayev, former head of Kizlyar District Police Department (“ROVD”), was tried in connection with the terrorist acts carried out by suicide bombers in the Moscow subway, back in 2010. The court has stripped Isayev of his rank.
According to the prosecution, the former official had been a member of Caucasus Islamic Emirate, a jihadist organization also active in parts of Syria. Isayev allegedly transported one of the suicide bombers to the Kizlyar bus station before she traveled from there to Moscow.
Isayev’s defense denied his guilt, presenting the court with an affidavit that Isayev had been at a hospital on the same day when he was supposed to have transported the would-be terrorist, and could not have driven her in his car.
The media have pointed out that the case against Isayev rests on hearsay — that is, the testimonies of already convicted terrorist combatants, who didn’t even claim to know the defendant personally, and said they’d heard about his criminal activities from others.
On March 29, 2010, 41 people were killed and 88 injured by explosions at two central Moscow subway stations, Lubyanka and Park Kultury. Later, Caucasus Islamic Emirate’s leader Doku Umarov took credit for the attack.
Con-Servatives: UK Net Migration to Remain in Hundreds of Thousands Despite Tory Promises
Contrary to long-standing promises from Britain’s governing Conservative Party, net migration is expected to remain in the hundreds of thousands for the foreseeable future, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) predicted this week.
In its list of Spring projections, the Office for Budget Responsibility said that net migration will remain at around 245,000 per year until at least the 2026/27 fiscal year, revising the estimate up by 40,000 more migrants compared to its previous release in November.
Alongside increases in refugee applications from Hong Kong and Ukraine, the statistician agency pointed to the post-Brexit points-based immigration system implemented by former Prime Minister Boris Johnson as a key factor in the continued high waves of migration, given that it failed to set a firm annual cap on migration.
However, in comments provided to Breitbart London, Alp Mehmet, chairman of Migration Watch UK, suggested that annual arrivals over the coming years could actually be even higher: “The OBR’s assumption of net migration settling at 245,000 per annum has no basis. It was over half a million in the year to June 2022 and very likely to have been even higher for the whole of last year.”
“The expectation that it will be around a quarter of a million by 2026 is fantasy. It also suggests that the government has no intention of getting a grip of the scale of immigration, as the public want,” he explained.
“Failing to do so will only lead to further massive, unsustainable population increase, as happened in just 20 years when it was the prime driver of an eight million growth in our population.”
Despite many voters backing the Conservative Party in the 2019 election in the hopes of finally having a government free from European Union rules and able to actually reduce the number of migrants coming to the country, the opposite occurred, with a record 1.1 million visas being issued to foreigners and net migration hitting a record half a million last year — nearly doubling the peaks seen under the leftist Labour administration of Tony Blair.
Since the days of David Cameron’s premiership from 2010 to 2016, Conservative governments consistently paid lip service to the notion of reducing the number of migrants coming into the country, vowing to cut net migration in their 2010, 2015, 2017, and 2019 election manifestos, yet numbers have only continued to increase.
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said during last Summer’s leadership contest to replace Johnson — which he lost — that if put into office he would seek to reduce migration, but he refused to commit to a hard annual cap and has made no significant moves to restrict migration since being installed in Downing Street in a globalist-backed coup against the shortly-tenured Prime Minister Liz Truss.
While Home Secretary Suella Braverman has previously said that the government should fulfil its longstanding promise to the people to bring down net migration to “the tens of thousands”, her tenure in the Cabinet has so far been consumed with failed attempts to solve the illegal boat migrant crisis in the English Channel rather than tackle legal mass migration, despite it having far more impact on the demographic trajectory of the country.
Recent data from the once-in-a-decade Census also revealed that the percentage of native Britons in England and Wales had fallen below 75 per cent.
Despite promising to “take back control” of the nation’s borders, the foreign-born population rose from around 7.5 million a decade ago to around 10.4 million today — roughly equivalent to the combined populations of Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland, or around a sixth of the UK population overall.
India: Muslim woman approaches SC against discriminatory Shariat law after she was given half the share in ancestral property as her brother
A Muslim woman named Bushara Ali has filed a special leave petition (SLP) before the Indian Supreme Court, highlighting the discriminatory nature of Shariat Law in the distribution of property between male and female heirs.
On Friday (March 17), a Division Bench of Justices Krishna Murari and Sanjay Karol issued a notice in the matter. Ali was allotted only 1/2 the shares in her ancestral property as compared to her male counterparts. According to reports, she was granted 7/152 shares in her ancestral property while her brothers were granted 14/152 shares.
Aghast at the discrimination meted to her under the archaic Islamic law, she has approached the apex court in the hopes of redressal. While contending that a female is not entitled to an equal share of property at par with a man under Shariat, the petitioner said, “In spite of (the) guarantee of the Constitution, Muslim women are subjected to discrimination.”
Ali has challenged Section 2 of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 for violating Article 15 (prohibition of discrimination) of the Indian Constitution. The contentious section of the Muslim Personal law states –
“Notwithstanding any custom or usage to the contrary, in all questions (save questions relating to agricultural land) regarding intestate succession, special property of females, including personal property inherited or obtained under contract or gift or any other provision of Personal Law, marriage, dissolution of marriage, including talaq, ila, zihar, lian, khula and mubaraat, maintenance, dower, guardianship, gifts, trusts and trust properties, and wakfs (other than charities and charitable institutions and charitable and religious endowments) the rule of decision in cases where the parties are Muslims shall be the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat).“
The petition was filed through advocate Matthew Joy who argued that the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 is a pre-constitutional legislature and thus fell under Article 13 (1) of the Indian Constitution. It states –
“All laws in force in the territory of India immediately before the commencement of this Constitution, in so far as they are inconsistent with the provisions of this Part, shall, to the extent of such inconsistency, be void.”
Pope Francis Calls 1,000 Year-Old Celibacy Rule ‘Temporary’, as US Catholics Track Priests that Are Using Gay Dating Apps
