#CONNED: The Top FIVE Climate Change LIES
Month: November 2022
Peter Whittle & Nigel Farage: Sadiq Khan, Culture Wars & Fighting Back
India: Muslim woman embraced Hinduism, married Ram in a Hindu temple, now receiving death threats from her family
In Jharkhand’s Godda district, a Muslim girl named Muskan Khatun embraced Hinduism and got married to her Hindu partner Ram. Muskan Khatun said that she likes the Hindu Dharma and is very happy with her decision.
Both Ram and Muskan reside in Godda. Muskan is originally from Bihar’s Bhagalpur and was staying in Godda with her maternal grandmother, and pursuing her studies. Ram and Muskan met a year ago and became friends. Their friendship soon blossomed into love. However, Muskan Khatun’s family members were opposed to Muskan’s relationship with Ram.
On October 17, 2022, the couple reached a local court to register their marriage, however, the family members of Muskan got to know about this and reached the court premises and assaulted her. Local police had to intervene and give security to the girl. Muskan told the court that she wants to marry Ram of her own free will and also sought police protection in the wake of a threat from her family.
Subsequently, the girl was provided with police protection. The couple then reached Meenakshi temple located at Peerpainti in Bhagalpur. Muskan converted to Hindu Dharma and amidst the chants of ‘Har Har Mahadev’, got married to Ram in a traditional Hindu wedding ceremony on November 22.
Reportedly, several Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), Bajrang Dal, and RSS activists were also present during the wedding. While Muskan’s family members have threatened to kill her as she has changed her religion and married a Hindu man, Ram’s family has accepted their marriage.
https://www.opindia.com/2022/11/jharkhand-muskan-khatun-ram-kumar-hinduism-death-threats/
Italy: Migrant labour activist suspends self from leftwing party amid probe for not paying workers
Italy’s foremost migrant labour and crop picker rights activist and only black MP on Thursday suspended himself from his leftwing party amid a probe into alleged day labourer exploitation by two pro-migrant collectives run by his mother-in-law.
Ivorian-born Aboubakar Soumahoro told his Green Europe-Left caucus he was suspending himself from the group after his mother-in-law, Marie Therese Mukamitsindo, was placed under investigation by prosecutors in Latina south of Rome for allegedly failing to pay workers and breaching their rights in the former Pomptine Plain marshes reclaimed and turned into rich farmland by Mussolini in the 1930s.
The cooperative, Karibu and Consorzio Aid, which were also run by Soumahoro’s wife Liliane Murekatete, allegedly also gave irregular contracts to workers.
The Italian media have accused Murekatete of living high on the hog while allegedly exploiting workers, running photos of her in designer clothes and accessories.
Green Europe chief Angelo Bonelli and Italian Left leader Nicola Fratoianni said Thursday that “with the utmost freedom, Aboubakar Soumahoro has told us he has decided to suspend himself from the parliamentary caucus of Green Europe-Left”.
They said “we respect this decision which, albeit not mandatory, shows the utmost respect that Aboubkara Soumahoro has for the institutions and the value of the political commitment to promote the issues of the battles in defence of the marginalised that we have always shared with him”.
Soumahoro entered parliament as Italy’s only black MP a month ago wearing muddy wellies to recall the migrant workers he has fought to lift out of wage slavery and inhumane conditions.
COVID Lockdown Curfew Employed in German State Declared Illegal by Court
Harsh COVID lockdown rules employed in one German state that banned people from leaving their homes for reasons other than exercise, work, food, or a medical appointment were illegal, a court in the country has ruled.
Germany’s Federal Administrative Court ruled on Tuesday that curfew rules in place in Bavaria at the start of the pandemic were in breach of the law as there were not sufficient medical reasons to justify them.
The ruling will come as little comfort for many in Germany who remain under a myriad of lockdown restrictions despite the fact the vast majority of European nations have long since dropped measures aimed at controlling their citizenry over the spread of COVID.
According to a report by Der Spiegel, curfew rules forcing people to stay inside their homes were first implemented in Bavaria in 2020, but were subsequently ruled illegal by a local court within the state, which found that they disproportional impeded people’s rights.
Bavaria reportedly proceeded to appeal this decision at the Federal Administrative Court seemingly in the hopes of overturning the ruling that they had unjustly impeded the freedoms of their population.
However, the national court has upheld the lower court’s ruling, finding that authorities violated individual freedoms in a way that could not be justified with medical evidence.
In particular, the court criticised the state for employing overly draconian methods to limit the spread of COVID-19, when much milder methods that would have had a much lower impact on the fundamental rights of its citizens could have instead been used.
“The all-day… ban on leaving one’s own apartment to stay outdoors was a serious encroachment on the basic rights of [those affected],” a press release from the court on the ruling read.
“For proportionality in the narrower sense, it should have been plausibly demonstrated at the factual instance that, in addition to restricting contact, it could make a significant contribution to achieving the goal of reducing physical contacts and thereby preventing the spread of COVID-19,” it continued.
“That was missing here,” the press release went on to say.
It is not the first time a German court has ruled against lockdown measures implemented by authorities in the country.
For example, earlier this year, a complete ban on anti-lockdown protest walks that was put in place by one local assembly was ruled to be in breach of the law, with it being found that justifications against demonstrations for the reason that they could spread infection were ultimately too thin to accept.
However, these occasional rulings have been of little use to many under hardcore lockdown rules, with officials across the country keeping mask mandates and forced vaccine rules for healthcare workers in place to this day.
In turn, while largely ignored by legacy media outlets in the country, weekly protests against Germany’s perpetual state of COVID lockdown have also continued into the Winter of 2022, with many taking to the streets not only to demonstrate against lockdown, but also the ongoing energy and inflation crises currently ravaging many in Germany.
Germany is blocking a reduction in energy prices. Where are all the fighters for European values?
Although it has not yet been approved, when a German cap on energy and electricity prices comes into effect for large consumers, it will be half as low as the Czech cap for households. The German plan, which will result in huge savings for German industry, will come into effect even while giant subsidy programs from the temporary crisis framework authorized by the European Commission are currently running.
Germany blocks reduction in energy prices…
Czechia, which has €30 billion available for industry, received approval from the European Commission just last week for modest aid, where subsidies may not exceed 30 percent of eligible costs. In the case of exceptionally energy-demanding industries, such as glass factories or metallurgical companies, the subsidies can be 80 percent. The proposed German caps assume that the companies there will pay €130 per megawatt hour, but the price is currently around €350 per megawatt hour on the market.
The difference represents a state subsidy to its industry, which finds itself at an incredible competitive advantage. Does Germany even intend to notify the European Commission about its massive state aid like everyone else?
And to make matters worse, Germany, in its completely blind green energy policy, blocks other countries’ paths to lower energy market prices. Unlike them, it has the resources and can compensate its industry and population, and expensive energy is so beautifully green. It can do so, among other things, thanks to the economic strength acquired in the past, mainly thanks to the common market.
And so, Germany continues to block caps on the price of gas for electricity production, which, although it would cost it a lot of money in compensation to the owners of gas-fired power plants, would reduce the need to compensate the industry thanks to the reduction of the market price. But that would also make energy cheaper in neighboring countries, and Germany simply doesn’t like that, even though Germany and its Energiewende are without a doubt the main culprits of the current crisis.
… and complicates negotiations
And that’s not all either. Germany’s approach greatly complicates negotiations for LNG supplies from Qatar and similar countries, which understandably want long-term contracts for at least 20 years. The increase in mining and transport capacities requires investments with a long-term return.
However, the Germans are not on board. Instead, Germany will need gas for about five years and then it will be less and less dependent as they build all those windmills, solar panels, and hydrogen electrolyzers. Fossil fuel will then be passé. Since Germany refuses long-term contracts, LNG will be more expensive, and not by a little either.
Where are all those determined fighters for European values in the opposition parties in Poland and Hungary at the moment when the very core value of the European community on which it was founded decades ago is being demolished? And in the most important member country on top of everything?
We only know that the Czech politician Markéta Pekarová Adamová is probably very busy now because she is planning the introduction of the euro in the Czech Republic in 2030. However, her plans may come to nothing if conflict around national interests continues to escalate. In such a situation, the Union itself may not exist in 2030, but such a thought is too “impossible” for some to even consider.
Another busload of migrants heading to American VP’s home
Texas has sent a busload of migrants to US Vice President Kamala Harris’ house again. More migrants arrived last week on her doorstep at the United States Naval Observatory.
Texas Governor Greg Abbott confirmed that 50 illegal migrants who voluntarily signed up were bussed after being processed by government officials in his state. Some 8 400 migrants from Texas have already been sent to the nation’s capital since April.
The 150 illegals from Central and South America were transported in several buses to the Naval Observatory in September, and followed by around 80 more in October. Before reaching Texas, they had travelled from Colombia, Cuba, Guyana, Nicaragua, Panama, and Venezuela.
Two of the buses stopped outside Vice President Kamala Harris’s residence in northwest Washington, DC where their passengers got off.
Some 3 800 have been sent to New York City since August 5, while 1 200 went to Chicago since August 31, according to Texas officials. The first busload of migrants left for Philadelphia last week.
The transportation scheme is part of the Republican governor’s Operation Loan Star program, which aims to “fill the dangerous gaps left by the Biden Administration’s refusal to secure the border” as communities in the south struggle with a flood of illegals.
https://freewestmedia.com/2022/11/24/another-busload-of-migrants-heading-to-american-vps-home-2/
India: Book banned to ‘not offend Muslim sentiments’, judge had earlier granted interim bail to a girl with ‘Free Kashmir’ placard
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022, the Additional City Civil and Sessions Court in Bangalore stayed the distribution and sale of a book about Tipu Sultan in response to a petition filed by the former Chairman of the District Wakf Board Committee. The petition claims that the book propagates inaccurate information about Tipu Sultan, the 18th-century Islamic ruler of the former Mysore province.
According to the court order, the book “Tipu Nija Kanasugalu” (Real Dreams of Tipu), authored by Rangayana director Addanda C. Cariappa, is prohibited from being sold by the author, publisher Ayodhya Publication, and printer Rashtrotthana Mudranalaya until December 3.
Notably, Former District Wakf Board Committee Chairman BS Rafiulla filed the lawsuit, alleging that the book contains erroneous information about Tipu Sultan with no historical foundation or justification. Furthermore, he claimed that the word “turukaru,” which appears in the book, is an insult to Muslims. He claimed that the publication of the book would cause turbulence and social upheaval, disrupting public harmony.
The petitioner also contended that the author failed to include sources for the information in the book. The petitioner claimed that the author of the book’s foreword and the book’s author claims that the content is based on truth and accurate history and that this claim is wrong.
Taking the petitioner’s arguments into account, Additional City Civil and Sessions Court judge JR Mendonca ruled, “If the contents of the book are false and it contains false information about Tipu Sultan, and if the same information is distributed, it would cause irreparable loss to the plaintiff, and there is a chance of breach of communal peace and harmony.”
The court also observed, “If the book is circulated pending the appearance of the defendants, the purpose of the application itself would be defeated. It is common knowledge that controversial books sell like hotcakes. Therefore, at this stage, the balance of convenience is in favour of the plaintiff in granting the order of injunction.”
Notably, sessions court judge Jerald Rudolph Mendonca or JR Mendonca had previously granted interim bail to Nalini Balakumar, a Mysore University alumna who held a ‘Free Kashmir’ placard during anti-CAA protests at Mysore University. The girl was charged with the offence of sedition under section 124(A) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
Following that, the Mysuru Bar Association denied the victim legal aid and stated that they would not represent the victim, whom they claimed was involved in anti-national activities. Even the lawyer who was representing her had withdrawn from the case. However, some lawyers eventually defied the boycott and sought to take up her case.
Mendonca while granting bail to Nalini had stated at the time that the alleged offence was not solely punishable by death or life imprisonment. The court also stated that Nalini Balakumar has no criminal history and no ties to any banned organisation. According to the court, the petitioner immediately accepted that she had shown the placard and had explained her position in the matter, and she was also cooperating with the investigation. Mendonca also said that freedom of speech is necessary for the success of democracy as an individual has the right to express their opinion on having correct knowledge of the issues.
Woke German Soccer Team Focused on Politics Instead of the Game, Delivered Shock Loss By Japan
77% of French say government is ‘failing’ to control immigration
The vast majority of French people, 77 percent, say that the government “has failed” to control immigration in the country, according to an exclusive poll by the CSA institute for CNews published on Wednesday.
Respondents were asked the following question: “Would you say that the government succeeds or fails to control immigration in France?” The majority of all age groups selected the second option.
French people between the ages of 50 and 64 are the most likely to say the government has failed to control migration, at 83 percent. However, a similar proportion is seen in 35 to 49-year-olds (79 percent). Those believing the government has failed to control immigration is lower among 25 to 34-year-olds but still extremely high overall, at 70 percent. The youngest age group surveyed, and also the most multicultural, the 18 to 24-year-olds, saw 66 percent of respondents say the government is “failing” to control immigration.
Another finding of this study is that regardless of the political affiliation of the people surveyed, the judgment that the government is failing to control immigration is shared by both the right and the left of the political spectrum, although to varying degrees.
On the right, 100 percent of Reconquest supporters believe that the government is “failing” to control immigration. This result is followed by National Rally voters (94 percent) and Republican voters (92 percent).
On the left, this consideration is also widely shared, although in lesser proportions — 71 percent of France Insoumise supporters think that the government is not managing to control immigration, while 63 percent of those polled who are close to Europe Écologie-Les Verts (EELV) are of the same opinion.
It should be noted that the result is more mixed among socialists, of whom “only” 59 percent to believe that the government “has failed” in its control of immigration.
Nevertheless, across the left-wing parties, every single group polled showed a majority of respondents saying they believe that the government is failing to control immigration.
These results represent a major opening for the anti-immigration parties in France, and mirror previous surveys, which show the majority of the French believe France should restrict immigration, that immigration does not benefit the country, and that the Great Replacement is not only happening but serves as a grave matter of concern for the French public.
https://rmx.news/france/77-of-french-say-government-is-failing-to-control-immigration/