UK: 9-Year-Old Lithuanian Girl Stabbed to Death in Broad Daylight Attack – Authorities Mum on Identity of Attackers

WATCH: Army Veteran Arrested by ‘Politicised Police’ for Posting LGBT Pride Flag Meme on Facebook

In scenes akin to those traditionally associated with authoritarian regimes, police in Britain were filmed arresting a military veteran for posting a meme critical of woke gender ideology on Facebook.

“Is this the Gestapo? What has gone wrong in our country?” the veteran questioned as he was being placed in handcuffs by three officers in broad daylight outside of his suburban home.

The incident was captured live on video on Thursday by Reclaim Party leader Laurence Fox, who chastised the Hampshire Constabulary officers for acting as an “anti-British politicised police force.”

“They serve a protected ideology… if you criticise the new woke ideology, you criticise the Pride movement, you end up in cuffs, whether you have served this country and have long medals for distinction and good service, you will end up in cuffs for expressing a perfectly legal view,” he told the live audience on social media.

The veteran, at the time left unidentified for privacy purposes, was apparently arrested for reposting a satirical meme from Fox of four Progress Pride flags together to form a swastika.

Laurence Fox via Twitter (Screenshot)

The meme, which resulted in a Twitter suspension and calls for police investigationsagainst the actor turned anti-woke campaigner last month, was described by Fox as a commentary on how Pride Month is “enforced with a sense of hectoring authoritarianism”.

Despite the veteran saying that he had reposted the meme from Fox, the police chose not to arrest the Reclaim Party leader for the same post.

In the footage, one officer was heard justifying the arrest by saying that “somebody has taken offence” to the “homophobic” post shared on Facebook.

The arrest comes less than a week after the College of Policing issued national guidancetelling officers to focus on actual crimes rather than intervening in “debates on Twitter”.

In exclusive comments provided to Breitbart London, Laurence Fox said that the arrest demonstrated that the update in policing guidelines was a change without a difference: “It’s the difference between sausage and mash and toad in the hole, nothing has changed.”

“This shows that we aren’t really living in a democracy, the thin veil hiding the reality that we live in China has fallen,” he said, commenting that the British police have turned into nothing more than “the Gestapo, the Stasi, or the Cheka”.

The Reclaim Party leader said that he had no faith in the Conservative Party government to protect free speech, saying that they merely represent the “woke uniparty” and that prime ministerial candidates like Rishi Sunak are just figureheads “for the elite who are actually in charge”.

Fox said that although woke ideology has already spread throughout America, “at least they have the Second Amendment,” adding that “guns are a pretty good deterrent to knocking on a door because someone was offended.”

He concluded by saying that the Bad Law Project, which Fox established to dismantle political ideology disguised as law, will be “coming after every institution” in Britain to confront the spread of wokery.

On Friday afternoon, Mr Fox revealed on social media that the case against the veteran had been “dropped entirely” and that he will not face any charges.

Minutes prior to the arrest of the veteran, the same police force also arrested former officer Harry Miller, who previously won a legal battle against the recording of “non-crime hate incidents” at the High Court over him supposedly posting “transphobic” posts online.

Over the past five years, police have recorded over 120,000 such “non-crimes” — which are visible on criminal background checks.

In December, the court ruled that police had acted “unlawfully” by logging his posts in a police database despite there being no evidence of an actual crime.

Explaining his arrest on Thursday, Miller said that he was “arrested for obstructing a police officer” as they were trying to arrest the veteran for the Fox meme.

“My defence is that there is NO offence of obstructing a police officer who is engaged in unlawful duty,” Miller told Breitbart London. “In seeking to arrest a member of the public for posting a meme, the attempted arrest was entirely unlawful.”

“The police didn’t even know what law had been broken but acted purely on the basis that the flag had offended someone,” the FairCop campaigner added.

“I don’t want an apology. I want the Chief Constable’s head in my fridge. We do not live in an Orwellian society. We do not have a Stasi, a Cheka or a Gestapo.”

On social media, Miller noted that one of the officers who arrested him was wearing a “rainbow badge that said Hampshire Police on it,” adding that he told her that he refused to recognise her “authority to arrest a man over a flag when she herself was wearing one.”

Hampshire Constabulary has previously boasted of being one of the first forces in the nation to establish an “LGBT+ liaison scheme,” with this year marking the 25th anniversary of its inception.

The force currently has around 90 “LGBT+ Link Officers,” who are not only tasked with representing the constabulary at Pride events but also to “encourage the reporting of homophobic, biphobic, and transphobic hate crimes along with domestic abuse and sexual violence.”

Such hate crimes include “physical attacks, threats, or verbal and online abuse”.

In comments provided to Breitbart London, Hampshire Constabulary said: “Officers were making enquiries following a report that an offensive image had been shared online. They were investigating an alleged offence under Section 127 of the Communications Act (2003). As such, they attended an address in Aldershot in order to establish the exact circumstances around the social media post.”

“Following discussions, officers agreed to return to the address on July 28. When officers arrived they were prevented from entering the address to discuss a potential resolution to the matter. As a result, officers felt it was necessary to arrest a man at the scene so they could interview him in relation to the alleged offence.”

The force said that the 51-year-old man from Aldershot was “arrested on suspicion of sending by public communication network an offensive, indecent, obscene, menacing message or matter,” however he has since been released under investigation and has been “NFAd” (No Further Action).

The constabulary wanted to stress that its “officers come to work every day to protect the public” and that they were “acting in good faith” while investigating a supposedly offensive image posted online.

“Policing reports in relation to online content is a complex and challenging picture. We are engaging further with our Police and Crime Commissioner to make sure that we deploy our resource in a way that reflects need in our local communities.”

“A 57-year-old man from Market Rasen, Lincs, was arrested on suspicion of obstructing/resisting a constable in execution of duty. He was released under investigation, and our enquiries are ongoing. Due to this being a live investigation we cannot comment further.”

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2022/07/30/watch-politicised-police-army-veteran-arrested-for-posting-pride-flag-meme-on-facebook/

What are the first names of ‘German’ criminals?

Facts don’t matter: the assessment that foreigners are more criminal than Germans is officially considered to be a “right-wing extremist’ notion. By doing so, the problem is never addressed.

The majority of 21st-century Germans consider themselves “well-informed”. Many still read a daily newspaper, and more than 90 percent watch state-sponsored television and a colorful variety of different online media. Very few of them believe that they are – at least partially – confronted with an illusory world.

However, in mass media reporting, certain issues have become so obvious that they can hardly be hidden any longer. For example, when it comes to hot topicssuch as crimes committed by foreigners.

“The assertion that foreigners are much more criminal than Germans is part of the repertoire of right-wing extremist propaganda,” according to the Federal Agency for Civic Education, a body financed from taxpayers’ money. Consequently, reporting that assumes that foreigners are more prone to criminality than Germans should not appear in the mass media. Because otherwise the mass media would be part of “right-wing extremist propaganda”.

More than 30 years ago, foreigner crime in Germany was less widespread than it is today, and yet it was already present enough to warrant investigations and identify contributing social causes, as can be seen from various government-funded studies.

Today, only very rarely does the truth shine through even from official accounts. For example, it is only revealed when it is not about the criminality of people who officially appear in the statistics as foreigners, but about the criminality of supposed “Germans”.

In 2021, an answer from the North Rhine-Westphalian state government to a small query from MP Markus Wagner (AfD) about the first names of “German” perpetrators in the most populous federal state, gave a clue as to the state of affairs regarding foreign crime. “German” criminals do not have German names.

The truth has therefore more or less been officially declared as “right-wing extremist”.

Berlin is importing more crime

The Berlin Senate has meanwhile activated an emergency plan because of the mass influx of asylum seekers and is opening a large tent for around nine hundred people on the site of the former Tegel Airport. Originally, the tent was intended to accommodate Ukrainians who are not counted as asylum seekers. Of these , however, fewer than expected reach the capital.

Instead, almost a thousand additional asylum seekers poured into Berlin reception facilities in May alone, including 456 Moldovans, 147 Georgians, 92 Afghans, 82 Syrians, 70 Turks, 58 Vietnamese and 16 Iranians. The Berlin Senate blamed other federal states for the flood of asylum seekers. Due to capacity problems, they no longer participate in the distribution system for asylum seekers.

“The situation has worsened,” explained Senator for Social Affairs Katja Kipping (Left Party) to the Berliner Zeitung. “In most other federal states, there is actually an admission freeze for people who apply for asylum for the first time.” In addition to Berlin, only Bavaria, Hamburg, Baden-Württemberg and Rhineland-Palatinate are currently participating. As a result, Berlin is expecting around five hundred additional people for July.

Accommodation in the large tent represents the first stage in the Berlin emergency plan. If this is not sufficient, Berlin will switch to the second emergency stage. Then the already heavily indebted capital will be renting hostels and hotels to house asylum seekers.

In recent years, the capital’s government, made up of the SPD, the Greens and the Left Party, has repeatedly campaigned for the generous admission of asylum seekers.

Immigration record in 2022

By June 14, 339 984 people in the EU had already applied for asylum – 92 percent more than in the same period last year. This emerges from a communication from the EU asylum agency EUAA to the EU Commission, reported the Welt am Sonntag.

Despite the Ukraine war, which began in February this year and triggered a wave of asylum seekers, only a small fraction of them are from the conflict-ridden Eastern European country. With 22 700 applicants they make up only 6,7 percent. A special rule enables Ukrainians to be recognized directly and temporarily as refugees from the civil war without an asylum procedure.

Most asylum seekers still come from Islamic countries: 42 900 Afghans and 34 900 Syrians sought asylum in the EU in the first five and a half months of the year. According to the EUAA, they prefer to move straight on to Germany. The 22 900 Venezuelans, on the other hand, mostly wanted to go to Spain.

According to the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (BAMF), most Syrians have been living in Greece for years, to which they had moved from their first refugee country, Turkey. Because of better living conditions, many now want to go to Germany and apply for asylum again.

Germany actually currently recognizes the lack of social security in other EU countries as a reason for asylum. This means that if migrants complain about insufficient accommodation and care, for example in Greece, Germany immediately grants them protection status and they are given the right to stay.

Most “refugees” today come to Germany from other EU countries. The traffic light coalition also wants to give them the opportunity to be naturalized after just three years.

https://freewestmedia.com/2022/07/30/what-are-the-first-names-of-german-criminals/

He is convicted of theft and violence against spouses and minors, refuses to leave French territory and declares: “The wisdom of Algeria is to come and colonise France, marry and breed in order to convert the country to Islam”

FRENCH REPUBLIC

ON BEHALF OF THE FRENCH PEOPLE

COURT OF APPEAL OF RENNES

No. 22/217 No. RG 22/00399 – Portalis No. DBVL-V-B7G-S5JW

JURISDICTION OF THE FIRST PRESIDENT

O R D O N N A N C E

[…]
In decision of appeal filed on July 05, 2022 at 6.55 p.m. […] for :

Mr [N] [J] born on [date of birth 1] 1993 in [place 2], Algerian national.

[…]
an order of the Judge for Freedom and Detention of the Tribunal judiciaire de RENNES, issued on July 04, 2022 at 19:15, ordering the extension of Mr. [N] [J]’s stay in the premises not under the administration of the prison for a maximum period of thirty days from July 04, 2022 at 09:26;

[…]
Mr [N] [J] was the subject of a decree issued by the Prefect on July 20, 2020 and the Finistere on September 9, 2021, imposing an obligation to leave the territory.

He was sentenced by the BREST Criminal Court on October 29, 2021, to 8 months’ imprisonment and a five-year ban on entering French territory.

[…]
ABOUT THE MATTER,

[…]
In the present case, the prefecture justified its request for a second extension of detention on the grounds that the detainee posed a particularly serious threat to public order.

The file shows that Mr [N] [J] was convicted of theft and violence against spouses and minors, voluntarily refused to leave the country and stated at a hearing: “The time when France fucks Algeria is over, now Algeria fucks France; the intelligence of Algeria is to come and colonise France, to marry and breed in order to convert the country to Islam, France can reject me, I will return with 18 people”.

This reason of particularly serious threat to public order (which is not discussed in the appeal) was, moreover, rightly upheld by the first judge, as it falls within the criteria for the second extension.

The decision is upheld and the application based on Article 37 of the Legal Aid Act is dismissed.

FOR THE REASONS SET OUT ABOVE

in open court,

we DECLARE the appeal admissible ;

CONFIRM the order of the Judge of Liberty and Detention of the Court of Rennes of July 4, 2022;

ALLOW the application on the basis of Article 37 of the Legal Aid Act;

ORDER that the costs be paid by the State.

Issued in Rennes on July 07, 2022 at 4 p.m. Cour d’appel de Rennes, 7 juillet 2022, n°22/00399

https://www.fdesouche.com/2022/07/29/condamne-pour-vol-et-violence-sur-conjoint-et-mineur-il-refuse-de-quitter-le-territoire-francais-et-declare-lintelligence-de-lalgerie-est-de-venir-en-france-et-de-la-coloniser-se-marier-et-s/

Jewish student sues UK university for failing grade on pro-Israel essay

A Jewish student is suing a British university for giving her a failing grade on an essay that she said she was penalized for because it did not blame Israel for crimes committed by Hamas.

According to Leeds University student Danielle Greyman, 23, an essay she wrote about Hamas crimes against Gazans received a failing grade because it did not blame Israel. Due to the bad mark on the paper, Greyman was forced to retake the class, which she passed.

But because of having to retake the course, she was unable to graduate in time to begin a master’s degree at Glasgow University, the Daily Mail reported.

In the research paper, Greyman wrote about Hamas using human shields as a “betrayal of the Palestinian people by their government.” But the instructor’s notes on the essay said: “This ignores the fact that the Israeli state commits acts of violence.”

In an external review of the essay, an examiner who studied it said that it should have received a passing grade.

Greyman’s lawyers wrote a legal claim against Leeds University, alleging negligence, discrimination and victimization.

“It’s been massive emotional damage. I almost had a complete breakdown over this,” Greyman told the Jewish Chronicle.

She added: “[Sociology] was very much my passion, I wanted to become a sociologist. After this happened, I had an entire meltdown… I don’t think returning to sociology is an option. I can’t retrain in another subject, I’ve used my student loan, I’ve basically wasted this time in my life.”

Jonathan Turner, director of UK Lawyers for Israel, told the news outlet: “If students are penalized for defending Israel then that may constitute indirect discrimination… We are concerned that the underlying bias has not been addressed and remains liable to result in discriminatory treatment of other students.”

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/357333

27-Year-Old Triathlete Doctor in Canada Dies Four Days After She Collapses While Swimming – Fifth GTA Doctor to Die Within 2 Weeks