How Angela Merkel’s Green Agenda Caused the Economic Collapse of Germany

Remember how the world, especially the American media, fawned over former German Chancellor Angela Merkel?

The adoration was so over the top that in 2015 Time magazine named Merkel its “Person of the Year.” It described her as the “Chancellor of the Free World.”

Time owes whatever readers it has left a solemn apology. Today, Germans are suffering the bitter fruits of nearly every major economic and geopolitical decision Merkel made as chancellor.

Start with the German economy that she attempted to reset for the 21st century, which is reminiscent of how President Joe Biden explains to inflation-weary voters that we are going through “an incredible transition.”

But Merkel’s Germany was ahead of us in its “transition.” Today, the German economy is in tatters. A recent headline from Business Insider summarized the chaos: “German Industries Could Collapse Due to Russia Natural Gas Supply Cutbacks.” The Daily Telegraph recently described Germany as “the sick man of Europe.” Things are getting so desperate that the Germans are now considering rationing gas for their major industries to keep the lights on.

How did one of the five wealthiest countries in the world so quickly careen into this economic ditch?

It was Merkel’s vision of a new Germany. Merkel was the one who made the decision a decade ago to move Germany away from fossil fuels and nuclear power and instead “go green.” Her green energy crusade, which environmentalists heralded as a model for the world, nearly bankrupted the German manufacturing economy until the entire solar and wind energy debacle was scuttled. (Sadly, Biden apparently never got that memo.)

It was Merkel’s decision, against the advice of then-President Donald Trump, to build the Nord Stream pipeline. When Trump sagely warned in 2018 that Germans would rue the day they became overly reliant on Russian President Vladimir Putin’s energy, Merkel’s administration openly scoffed.

Putin isn’t the only one getting rich from Merkel’s blunders. She negotiated trade deals with China, blatantly undermining Trump’s strategy of economically isolating the Beijing menace. She chose to align Germany with rogue and militaristic regimes in Russia, China and Iran. This helped undermine NATO and Germany’s post-World War II close ties with the United States.

She refused to pony up the 2% of GDP that Germany owed NATO for Europe’s defenses, and she bristled when Trump demanded that be raised to 4%. Perhaps if the Germans and Europeans had heeded Trump’s advice, the debacle of Ukraine wouldn’t have happened.

The American media, during all this time that Merkel was steering Germany over a green energy cliff, took Merkel’s side in her open dispute with Trump. Susan Glasser of the New Yorker snorted in 2018 that Trump had “made war on Angela Merkel and Europe” and the NATO countries were “run(ning) out of patience with the President.”

That statement is foolish today, given the collapse of the euro and the economic downturn throughout the continent.

Even as an environmentalist, Europe’s savior was a flop. Merkel hogtied German industries to expensive and unreliable “renewable” energy by spurning natural gas and closing nuclear plants. The experiment failed miserably, and now Germany is vastly increasing the share of its power that comes from burning coal. That’s no strategy to stop climate change.

Under Merkel’s weak leadership, the euro was supposed to replace the dollar as the world currency soon. Instead, the euro is a currency in collapse. Even the Russian ruble is stronger.

Merkelism can be summarized as a strategy of patronizing enemies and alienating allies. Now with 20/20 hindsight, it is clear that the legacy of Merkelism is a chaotic world and a diminished Germany.

It turns out that peace through weakness is a failed national and economic security strategy. If Merkel was the “Chancellor of the Free World,” why is it that today’s world is not safer?

It is not cleaner.

It is not freer.

And it is not a more prosperous place.

In short, every major decision she made regarding global affairs made the world more dangerous, less free and less prosperous. She was to Germany what Biden has been to the U.S. — a complete and dismal failure.

Let’s hope we figure this out more quickly than the Germans did.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2022/07/how-angela-merkels-green-agenda-caused-economic-stephen-moore/

Sweden: A nine-year-old girl was raped in a playground by an Ethiopian migrant who had just been granted a permanent residence permit and then she was left for dead. The little girl is in a coma

Nyberg tells TV4 that the criminal assessment in the case is now aggravated rape of a child in addition to attempted murder. The seriously injured girl is still in hospital and has not yet been questioned.

The prosecutor tells several media outlets that the age of the suspected 13-year-old boy is unclear and that it is possible that he is in fact of age.

Investigators are now trying to collect documents to clarify the boy’s real age. He will also be subjected to a medical age assessment.

The suspected boy and his family had arrived in Sweden from Ethiopia in the summer of 2017. The boy is accused of abusing other girls and young women in Skellefteå.

Last summer he was suspected of abusing an adult woman in the town. The boy is known in the community and has been displaced to different schools.

At the end of June this year, he was granted a permanent residence permit for Sweden.

As the suspect is allegedly 13 years old, he has not been arrested or detained. There is speculation in Skellefteå as to whether the boy is actually 13 years old. Many suspect that he is indeed of an age capable of committing crimes, and that he should therefore have been detained for the attempted murder of the little girl. Samnytt

https://www.fdesouche.com/2022/07/14/choc-en-suede-une-fillette-de-9-ans-a-ete-violee-et-laissee-pour-morte-sur-une-aire-de-jeux-par-un-migrant-ethiopien-qui-venait-dobtenir-un-permis-de-sejour-permanent-la-petite-fille-est-dans-le/

Here We Go… Gates-Funded International Organization Names 11 Viruses As Potential Candidates for the “Next Pandemic”

France: ” For the sake of hygiene”, users of a public swimming pool complain about the behavior of a woman dressed in a burkini

File:Burkini modesty swimsuit PROP 178 MG 2016 01.jpg – This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.

The burkini is not just a controversial topic usually the subject of talk shows. It is increasingly a reality to which operators and users of swimming pools all over France have to adapt. An example of this is an incident at the municipal swimming pool of Ribérac (Dordogne), which happened around noon on Wednesday July 13. Several bathers observed a woman wearing a burkini enter the pool.

“I was surprised to see the woman dressed from head to toe,” a witness told the Sud-Ouest newspaper. “I thought to myself that this is a real hygiene problem,” he said, recalling that men are not allowed to wear loose swimming shorts in municipal swimming pools. “I have to admit that I don’t understand,” he explained. According to him, this is the second time in less than two months that such an incident has occurred in Ribérac: “I then approached the district’s elected representatives without anything being done.”

The president of the Périgord Ribéracois Municipal Association (CCPR), contacted by the Sud-Ouest newspaper, remained perplexed, admitting that he had “not been informed of the presence of this person”. Didier Bazinet also remained evasive when asked about the rules of the municipal swimming pools in Ribérac – where the burkini should not be allowed in principle.

However, as reported by the daily newspaper in the south of France, a new version of the bathing rules was drawn up a few days earlier, on July 11. This was described as “more precise than the previous one” and was intended to enforce “strict compliance with hygiene regulations” in the swimming pool. However, the new regulation, which was drafted at the request of the Dordogne prefecture, has not yet come into force: It must first be confirmed by the administration, which must take into account existing case law. Undoubtedly, the case of Grenoble, where the Council of State recently confirmed the burkini ban, should serve as an example for the Ribéraco administration.

https://www.valeursactuelles.com/regions/nouvelle-aquitaine/dordogne/no_agglomeration/societe/dordogne-au-nom-de-lhygiene-des-usagers-dune-piscine-publique-denoncent-la-baignade-dune-femme-en-burkini

Germany: Two Italian restaurateurs found dead in Stuttgart

 Two Italian restaurateurs were found dead in Stuttgart on Monday afternoon, German police said Wednesday.
    The two men, both aged 53, were found in the cellar of a building housing their eatery, named Valle.
    Autopsies have been ordered.
    Police said they were following all leads and nothing as yet pointed to the involvement of organized crime.
    The Calabrian ‘Ndrangheta mafia has a strong presence in Germany.

https://www.ansa.it/english/news/general_news/2022/07/13/two-italian-restaurateurs-found-dead-in-stuttgart_0834c340-9e7e-4b88-bde7-28be6f5e71ed.html

Jihadists Remain Europe’s Biggest Terror Threat Despite Focus on Right-Wing

A report by Europol examining terrorism within the EU in 2021 has found that jihadists remain the single biggest threat to the bloc, despite an increasingly political focus on right-wing extremists.

Europol’s latest assessment of terrorism within the EU has found that jihadists remain the single greatest danger within the bloc, with there having been over 260 arrests in relation to radical Islam.

This is despite the fact that both politically and within the media, the focus has largely shifted to threats on the right, as well as those posed by opponents of draconian anti-COVID-19 lockdown measures.

“The findings of the [The annual EU Terrorism Situation and Trend Report] 2022 confirm that lone actors associated with jihadist and right-wing violent extremism remain the biggest threat associated with potential terrorist and violent extremist attacks in the EU,” the report published on Wednesday reads.

However, while the report’s own introduction lists right-wing terror as being one of the greatest threats to Europe, the publication’s own data shows that there were over four times the arrests made in regards to radical Islam, as well as nearly four times the number of terror attacks that were either completed, foiled, or failed.

Also discussed in the report is the dramatic fall in the number of left-wing terror attacks that were attempted or completed in 2021 when compared with the previous year, falling from 26 attacks in 2019 and 25 attacks in 2020 to absolutely no attacks in 2021.

Despite the massive shift in the numbers, the report attributes the fall, not to a change in attitude amongst Europe’s left-wing, but “a change in classification of incidents by some Member States from terrorist to extremist attacks”, which has removed any attacks in 2021 that would have been otherwise counted from the statistics.

Europe also reportedly dealt with a small amount of what Europol classifies as “Ethno-nationalist and Separatist” terrorism in 2021 from the likes of dissident Republican groups in Ireland, as well as Kurdistani separatists.

In particular, the report mentions that the “Kurdistan Workers’ Party” — or PKK — was active in the likes of Belgium and Germany, a significant distance away from the competed territory located within the borders of Turkey, Syria, Iraq and Iran.

The report also notes that the Taliban’s success at taking over Afghanistan has influenced Islamist propaganda, and has been used by extremists to promote extremist narratives.

A seemingly disproportionate focus on the right-wing is far from a trend limited to only the institutions of the EU that are looking to fight extremism and terrorism.

For example, a report into extremism published by German officials that described the right as the single greatest threat to the German state last month prompted accusations that government officials were ignoring the violent actions of “fanatical Islam” and the far-left in order to demonise the right.

The minister in charge of the report — the Social Democratic Party’s Nancy Faeser — had previously written for a far-left publication called “Antifa”.

“It is high time that Minister Faeser took off her ideological glasses and faced the challenges across the board,” Thorsten Frei, a senior CDU politician, said in response to the publication of the report.

“As right as it is to intensify the fight against right-wing extremism, it is wrong not to take the threats from left-wing extremism, fanatical Islamism and anti-state efforts that deviate from previous patterns just as seriously,” Frei continued, arguing the “statistics speak for themselves” regarding the dangers these other groups pose to Germany.

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2022/07/14/jihadists-remain-europes-biggest-terror-threat-despite-focus-on-right-wing/