Month: April 2022
After gang rape in Linz, Austria: Court released four suspected asylum seekers!
Hard to believe: Those four asylum seekers suspected of raping a 16-year-old girl in Linz on 30 March were released from pre-trial detention after a review of a remand in custody ! The Linz Regional Court did not provide a reason for this decision, referring to the ongoing proceedings.
A spokeswoman of the public prosecutor’s office told the Austrian press agency APA that the analysis of various camera recordings in the area of the station showed that the girl had come to the main station by tram in the late afternoon that day and, after a quick glance at her mobile phone, had approached a group of young men in which one of the suspects was standing. The camera recordings, however, are without sound, and what happened next can also no longer be seen. No one claims to have observed the later victim being forcibly dragged to the scene of the crime, a former mail distribution centre near the railway station.
The 16-year-old is said to have been in contact with one of the suspects via a social network days before the crime, but the exact content of the conversation could not be established. The victim will be questioned in an interrogation after Easter.
The four suspects, a 14-year-old Iranian and three 15-year-old Afghans, have so far denied the rape – two say the sex took place voluntarily, one only wants to have stood by, the fourth remains silent.
The court’s decision is incomprehensible to outsiders because it is simply inconceivable that a 16-year-old girl, even if she voluntarily accompanies a few young boys for whatever reason, would voluntarily lie down on the cold floor near the emergency exit of a refugee shelter to have group sex with them. In addition, the police officers who happened to be looking for a toilet had caught the four suspects in an unambiguous pose and they had all fled. Consensual sex looks different.
These and other similarly incomprehensible decisions of Austrian soft justice create the impression among the population that migrants in this country obviously enjoy carte blanche for criminal acts of all kinds, while Austrians are already punished if they wear their face masks wrongly in the underground. This is a catastrophic signal that diminishes any trust in our justice system and also leads to increasing resentment and disaffection among the police, who often risk their lives in the hunt for criminals.
Austria: Radical Muslim beats man who distributed Bibles
On Tuesday afternoon, savage skirmishes took place in Vienna’s 12th district. An unknown man suddenly ran at a man who was distributing free Bibles in the pedestrian zone as a Christian missionary. The victim tried to defend himself at first, but had to flee after the attacker kicked him several times.
According to eyewitnesses, one of the two men was enraged by the Bible distributor’s shirt, which had “Christ is God” written on it in Arabic script. Apparently, this provoked the thuggish man to such an extent that he completely lost his temper and literally chased him. And this is exactly what outraged a colleague of the victim, because: in his opinion, the attack had radical-religious backgrounds.
According to an eyewitness, the alarmed police intervened and mediated the situation. However, the victim was probably not seriously injured. According to a police spokesperson, no charges have been filed so far.
https://www.heute.at/s/mann-attackiert-in-wien-meidling-bibel-verteiler-100201327
Electoral push from Brussels to abolish nations
In the spirit of supranational organizations and globalist interest groups of “global governance”, another hurdle is to be cleared on the way to the EU central state in May: The change in the electoral law for the European Parliament is up for voting.
From now on, “transnational lists” with candidates from various member states are to be increasingly elected, and no longer national candidates. This further reduces the connection between voters and their “representatives”.
In the shadow of the Ukraine war, supporters of a strictly centralized European Union continue to disempower the member states. At the request of the socialist MEP Domènec Ruiz Devesa, the European Parliament’s Committee on Constitutional Affairs supported a legislative initiative by 19 votes to nine at the end of March, which is intended to replace the current European Electoral Law for the European Parliament (EP).
The MEPs are now to be elected from Europe-wide lists of candidates. The voters do not know these representatives in the slightest and they no longer have any linguistic or cultural ties with these individuals. From the point of view of the proponents, a “European identity should be strengthened”; however, the exact opposite is the case.
The “geographical representation” of the lists is also supposed to ensure that smaller member states are not “disadvantaged in competition”. A new European electoral authority is to be responsible for registering the lists. The EU-wide lists of candidates are to be submitted by European electoral bodies.
FPÖ and AfD are resisting, but old parties want to abolish themselves
The proposal still has to be voted on in the EP plenary session on May 3. All EP groups in which Austrian parties are represented (European People’s Party – EPP (ÖVP), Social Democrats – S&D (SPÖ), Liberals – Renew (NEOS) and Greens (Verts/ALE)) have already voted in favor of the proposal. Only the rightwing FPÖ voted unanimously against it. The situation is similar in Germany, where all the old parties except for the anti-immigration, rightwing AfD are in favor of the initiative.
The FPÖ MEP Dr. Georg Mayer explained the push to Austrian weekly Wochenblick: “The new EU electoral law is a foreshadowing or the next step in the planned establishment of the EU unitary state. Austrians should be forced to vote for any candidate from Spain, Malta or Greece that they don’t even know or understand. That is completely absurd and highly questionable in terms of democratic policy.”
The principle according to which each member state appoints and sends its representatives in the EU Parliament is to be broken up and effective representation of any country prevented.
“It should also be a goal of this reform to eliminate the barriers that hinder the rights to vote of persons with disabilities, members of minorities or as a result of residence in a different country.native advertising
“Arguably, the purely political dimension of the elections is more important than the legal framework. It remains challenging to generate a pan-European debate, one that can surpass the noise of 27 simultaneous national elections that often revolve around domestic issues or examine the national government in office,” according to the Spanish politician.
Even as an MEP, Georg Mayer knows that the electorate in a representative democracy needs a connection to their politicians and he is against the abolition of the national lists.
The Devesa report noted that European political parties should replace national political parties, since these are best placed to “contribute to the development of European political awareness”. The European Parliament is not made up of the people of the member states, but from “representatives of the citizens of the Union”.
The bill would disenfranchise millions of European voters on the basis of a residence qualification and deprive them of the right to vote for someone who has their local (and best) interests at heart.
Mayer held the ÖVP responsible for this development: “All this is only possible because parties like the ÖVP, which at home always pretend to represent national or Austrian interests, bow down to Brussels and vote for more centralization and disempowerment of the citizens.” On May 3, there is still the opportunity to correct this massive mistake during the vote in Strasbourg.
https://freewestmedia.com/2022/04/14/electoral-push-from-brussels-to-abolish-nations/
Does France deserve its fate? Islamization becomes irreversible when the Muslim population reaches 20%. French election results can speed the process or slow it
by Giulio Meotti
“The British will be a minority by 2066”. The banner with those words flew over the heads of the spectators at the football match between Manchester City and Liverpool. A light plane with a banner attached passed over the Etihad Stadium, causing a wave of outrage on social media. “Who pays to fly these racist Etihad banners?”
Unfortunately, the phrase (“the British will be a minority by 2066”) does not come from an old English fascist like Mosley, but from David Coleman, the most important demographer in England, a professor at Oxford. “By 2066, whites born in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland will be outnumbered,” writes Coleman in the left-wing Prospectmagazine. “The 50 percent threshold has no special demographic meanings, but it will have a considerable psychological and political impact and the transition from majority to minority will represent a huge change in cultural, political and religious identity.”
Coleman warns of the consequences of the transformation taking place in Britain and other parts of Europe. “History is not optimistic about the ability of ethnic groups or religions to overcome differences. The ethnic transformation implicit in current trends would be a major, unexpected and irreversible change in British society, unprecedented in at least a millennium.”
Coleman’s reference to the thousand years is interesting… Many countries that are Islamic today were originally Christian, such as Algeria, Turkey, Egypt and Syria. In other countries too, Islam supplanted the previous religion: Pakistan was Hindu, Afghanistan was Buddhist, Iran was Zoroastrian. Britain has a rich culture, but so did they.
When the Muslim population exceeds 5 percent, minorities usually begin to form and live apart. Beyond that percentage, Muslims exert exorbitant influence in proportion to their percentage, pushing for the introduction of halal food in public schools, prosecution of criticism of Islam in the courts and the construction of gigantic mosques, for example. This is already happening in France, Germany, Netherlands, Sweden and other European countries.
When Muslims exceed 10 percent, they tend to increase illegality as a means of imposing their conditions, as is already the case in many French cities and neighborhoods where they are a third of the population and the police are afraid to enter..
Islamization becomes irreversible when the Muslim population reaches 20 percent.
Europe is at the first and second stage of this phenomenon. Each decade will bring us closer to completing it, but we will get there.
And when the demographics change, the change in civilization is very rapid. The city of Minneapolis, which in the United States has the largest Islamic community in the country, has just authorized the muezzin’s call to prayer for its 40 mosques, from 7 am to 10 pm, every day, all year round.
But you can’t save someone who wants to commit suicide at all costs. The French presidential elections tell us that the people cannot be saved against their will. Because it is clear that this election, if confirmed in the second round, will be remembered as a watershed, as if the French had not yet understood that their country is becoming Lebanese at high speed and risks disappearing into the globalist-Islamist vortex.
And the worst is that the younger generations are even more blind. In all cities, thanks to the vote of immigrants, Jean-Luc Mélenchon has exceeded 30 percent. Another eight days of campaign and he would have reached the second round, in front of the usual Marine Le Pen, the old nationalistic losing camp. Furthermore, all the left and the Greens total over 33 percent of the votes, a totally immigrationist and pro-Islam bloc.
But the more the French cry for their fate, the more they seem to want it.
Eric Zemmour’s program was the only one that lived up to the danger. He wanted to stop external immigration, assimilate the internal one and rebuild the cultural, religious and demographic identity by defeating the “woke”. A courageous and culturally audacious program, which required will and determination (this was understood by the French Jews who fled to Israel, who voted en masse for Zemmour).
But, after decades of brainwashing, it seems that society still wants Macron and so will get the man who said there is no “French culture”, the “liquid society candidate”. The will of the people, however misguided, is sovereign. Therefore it must be accepted. And in five years they will have an even more pro-immigration president, because the vote of immigrants will be increasingly decisive.
Germany first chooses a “traffic light” government that will further open the doors to Turkish immigration to run the Mercedes factories. Now France is about to re-elect Macron, the man of “yes, but”. Meanwhile, a fratricidal and suicidal war rages in Eastern Europe.
France: 3 women in niqab cautioned by police for covering their faces refer to obligation to wear face mask
Courage and full support for the police officers. What incredible self-discipline!
SCIENCE: Two Female Prisoners at All-Women’s Prison Become Pregnant After Having Sex with Transgender Inmates
A third of Germans believe they are living in a ‘sham democracy’
Major events over the past two years have raised doubts about the political system in Germany. It is therefore no wonder that despite considerable state propaganda, a clear proportion of citizens remain skeptical according to a recent poll.
A nationwide representative survey by the Allensbach Institute for Demoscopy on behalf of the state-affiliated television station Südwestrundfunk (SWR) on citizens’ understanding of democracy became known on Monday . And the results are impressive: Around a third of the population thinks that the Federal Republic of Germany is a sham democracy. Can the poll result be real? Yes, because the Allensbach Institute for Public Opinion is one of the most renowned survey institutes in Germany. And even the client who commissioned the study certainly never expected such a result.
The survey is likely to be bitter for those in power: Some 31 percent of the study participants agreed with the sentence: “We live in a sham democracy in which the citizens have no say.” In the east of the republic, almost half of the citizens (45 percent) believed they were living in a sham democracy. And 28 percent of those surveyed also stated that the democratic system should be “fundamentally changed”.
Of course, the study result was interpreted by the mainstream media as desired, although the interpretation was questioned.
Decades ago, the widely recognized German administrative scientist Professor Hans Herbert von Arnim warned that political parties were preying on the state. His fundamental criticism of the political system was that it disempowered people. His books were bestsellers – but nothing has since changed. On the contrary: Corona measures, political scandals, shady “mask deals”, the mainstream press with their unanimous opinions, encroachments on central fundamental rights and “forced vaccination”, are all issues that may have led to many citizens being extremely critical of the political system, not to mention those who feel socially left behind by never-ending immigration, constant tax increases, inflation and climate-hysterical cost-intensive cuts by a rich Green functionary elite.
More taxes, inflation and war could contribute to increasing the number of disgruntled voters. If citizens have to pay even more for fuel and heating costs, then one would not be clairvoyant to suspect that the recorded 31 percent will increase significantly. In real democracies, the citizens are also allowed to have a say.
https://freewestmedia.com/2022/04/14/a-third-of-germans-believe-they-are-living-in-a-sham-democracy/
Spain: Muslims attack Easter procession (VIDEO)
The local police arrested two violent people who had tried to disrupt a procession in El Vendrell in the province of Tarragona.
They were several neighbours who noticed their arrival and their malicious intent and warned them not to attack the procession violently.
This happened on Sunday in El Vendrell (Tarragona) when several people entered a Holy Week procession and tried to obstruct it and prevent the Holy Week celebrations. The local police arrested two of the people, North Africans, for causing a disturbance to public order.
The ugly incident occurred after 7pm when a group of youths occupied Àngel Guimerà Street just before the Easter procession passed by. Several neighbours noticed their attendance and evil intentions and warned them not to attack the procession.
(…) Some people from the group even attacked people who demanded respect for the procession.
For this reason, several patrols of the local police had to be deployed. They were given a violent encounter by the youthful rioters. The confrontation ended with the arrest of two persons who were charged with disturbing public order. Antena 3
Racist Subway Mass Shooter: “These White Motherf-––s, This is What They Do”
Not the racial supremacist the media was looking for, but maybe the one the media should have been talking about.
A troubled man who railed against Mayor Eric Adams and made bizarre, threatening rants on YouTube has been identified as a person of interest — and now a suspect — in the savage Brooklyn subway attack that injured at least 23 people Tuesday morning, officials said.
“These white motherf—ers, this is what they do,” he said. “Ultimately at the end of the day, they kill and commit genocide against each other. What do you think they gonna do to your black ass?”
In his rambling conspiracy theory, James claimed that a race war would follow the ongoing conflict in Europe.
“It’s just a matter of time before these white motherf—ers decide, ‘Hey listen. Enough is enough. These n—ers got to go,’” he said.
“And what’re you going to do? You gonna fight. And guess what? You gonna die. ‘Cause unlike President [Volodymyr Zelensky] over in Ukraine, nobody has your back. The whole world is against you. And you’re against your f—ing self. So why should you be alive again is the f—ing question. Why should a n—er be alive on this planet? Besides to pick cotton or chop sugar cane or tobacco.”
The only options James could find, he claimed, was to commit more violence or become a criminal.
“And so the message to me is: I should have gotten a gun, and just started shooting motherf—ers,” he said.
And wouldn’t you know it, that is what happened.
Frank James’ identity as the shooter hasn’t been confirmed, he’s just identified as a person of interest, but the media is already carefully backing away from the story because it doesn’t star the kind of racist they’re looking for.
Instead James’ black nationalism is what the media has been promoting and propping up, it’s the kind of hateful stuff that gets you a spot at the DOJ or the Supreme Court.
And maybe, just maybe, it shouldn’t.