Month: February 2022
Swiss Referendum Result STUNS Political Establishment
🇨🇦 Justin Trudeau “Accidentally” Exposes His Own Government 😂
“I NEVER Imagined He Would F*CK UP This BAD” Jordan Peterson
Forced Vax had ‘No Effect’ On Jab Uptake in Austrian Capital – Claim
A report in a major Austrian newspaper has claimed that the country’s new regime of forced vaccination has had no positive effect on jab uptake in the nation’s capital.
The new regime of forced COVID vaccination in Austria has had no positive effect on jab uptake in Vienna: this is the claim made by Austria’s best-selling newspaper. Furthermore, the government figures the paper claims to have seen shows there was actually a drop-off in the numbers being jabbed since the legal mandate came into force on February 5.
According to the Kronen Zeitung report, instead of increasing the uptake of jabs, the number of vaccinations actually declined, starting the day before the new forced vax rules came into force.
“There is no mandatory vaccination effect – and if there is, then rather in the other direction,” the publication claimed.
In particular, the publication notes significant lows for those getting jabbed on February 6 — one day after the obligation came into force — and February 12, which both reportedly saw major drop-offs in the number of first, second and booster jabs being administered.
The source of the figures released by Kronen Zeitung is reportedly the office of City Councilor for Health Peter Hacker, which has since criticised the new vaccination rules.
“All in all, the Austrian instruments relating to measures and vaccination do not result in a well-rounded strategy and have no recognizable goal,” the office is reported to have told Kronen Zeitung. “That is why no run on vaccinations is to be expected in the coming days and weeks.”
While the released figures do appear to run with the publication’s claim, Breitbart London was not able to independently verify Kronen Zeitung’s claim, as the data is not yet publicly available as of the time of writing.
While mandatory vaccination rules aimed at curbing the Chinese Coronavirus may not have caused a spike in the number of Viennese getting jabbed, it does appear that it has resulted in a spike in the number of unhappy Austrians attending anti-lockdown protests.
Since the announcement of the forced vaccination measures last year, thousands of people have attended anti-mandate demos in Vienna and beyond, with many demanding an end to the nation’s various anti-COVID measures.
Of particular note was a recent Convoy demonstration that took place in Vienna that bore a striking resemblance to “Freedom Convoy” anti-lockdown protests taking place in Canada and beyond.
According to a Kronen Zeitung report, columns of vehicles — some equipped with flags — moved through the city centre, honking their horns as they drove past police.
This is despite the demonstration being banned in advance by authorities, with the publication also claiming that a general ban on honking is also in place in Vienna.
Despite the government bans, however, the convoy-style demonstration looks set to become a regular feature on Viennese streets, with one reporter claiming that the dates for future demos are already being established online.
Belgium: 13 Islamist terrorists, most of them Belgians and Moroccans, have had their Belgian citizenship revoked
The Court of Appeal in Brussels has just revoked the Belgian citizenship in absentia of 13 people convicted of terrorism, La Libre Belgique reported on Monday. The sentences were published today in the Belgian Official Gazette.
The revocation of citizenship is a measure with framework conditions that can only affect dual nationals. The making of stateless persons is excluded, the newspaper reminds.
Twelve of the 13 revocations of citizenship concern men who had joined the ranks of the jihadists in Syria between the end of December 2012 and December 2014. The 13th had joined in Afghanistan in 2007. They were removed from the civil registers.
These 13 dual nationals, the vast majority of them Belgians and Moroccans, had all been convicted in absentia in Belgium for terrorism. Le Vif
A survivor of Saint-Étienne-du-Rouvray reports: “They slaughtered him on the spot, the poor guy” – Trial against the Islamists has begun
The Islamist terrorists of Saint-Étienne-du-Rouvray had fatally wounded him with several knife wounds on July 26, 2016, when they brutally murdered Father Hamel. As the trial for this attack begins on Monday February 14, 92-year-old Guy Coponet gave his testimony to France Info. He recounted how one of the attackers put a mobile phone in his hand so he could film the scene and then the murder of the priest. “They took Father Jacques, he took him out of the pews. They started beating him, a lot…” he reported almost six years after the crime.”I heard him say, “Satan back”, and then, as if on command, “Satan, clear off”. Then it was over because the guy slit his throat”.
The terrorists then attacked Guy Coponet. They tried to cut his throat as well and also stabbed him on the arm and in the back. ” Then they threw me next to the altar”. While the two men “continued to smash everything that could be smashed”, “I squeezed my throat as hard as I could so that it wouldn’t bleed too much. I pretended to be dead,” he continued. His wife, who has since died, was taken hostage by the two assailants as they tried to leave the building, but was rescued by a police officer.
From the trial, the survivor expects above all that “the real people responsible, […] those who gave the orders” will be identified. The two terrorists were shot dead by police officers. The indictment is against three of their relatives, who are suspected of having shared their ideology, known of their plans or tried to join the Islamic State. The instigator of the attack, Rachid Kassim, was reportedly killed in Iraq in 2017, but is still charged due to a lack of evidence of his death.
Sweden: Teacher fired for refusing to refer to trans child with gender-neutral pronoun
A Swedish teacher has been fired for refusing to refer to a non-binary student named “Saga” with a gender-neutral pronoun in a case that is attracting widespread attention in Sweden.
The young transgender person, along with his parents, had been asking the teacher for eight months to refer to him using “hen,” which is a new Swedish pronoun which is neither masculine nor feminine, and which was only accepted in the Swedish school dictionary in 2015.
The pronoun “Hen” is not widely used in Sweden, but Saga, which is not the student’s real name but how the Swedish press is referring, to him, wanted the teacher to use it, arguing that it helped him deal with psychological issues arising from being unsure about his gender identity.
The teacher, for her part, justified her refusal by highlighting her Christian faith and said she was “defending an ideology-free language in the school system.”
The Swedish ombudsman took up the case and said that it was a serious form of harassment and case of discrimination that needed to be fought.
In the ombudsman’s press release, the authority states “that the teacher, against the student’s express wishes, deliberately refrained from using the pronoun that the student identifies with, which is a serious form of harassment and something that a principal must immediately ensure ceases. At school, all students should feel safe and respected and not discriminated.”
The school, which did not act quickly enough, will have to pay compensation of €15,000 euros to the teenager, which is a first in Sweden.
The teacher, for her part, was fired.
Saga was harassed and discriminated against by his teacher, who refused to use a gender-neutral pronoun, according to the Discrimination Ombudsman in its verdict, as reported by Aftonbladet.
“This is an incredible confirmation. No other child should ever have to go through what Saga had to,” Saga’s mother says.
“Despite the principal’s promise to talk to the teacher, the student was called a wrong pronoun for more than one semester,” states the Discrimination Ombudsman in a press release.
Clas Lundstedt, press officer at the Discrimination Ombudsman, believes that the decision may affect similar cases in the future. Saga’s parents are of the same opinion.
ALEX BELFIELD EXPLAINS WHY HES CANCELLED & banned from YouTube
The Global Covid Vaccination Campaign Is Courting Catastrophe
By Vasko Kohlmayer
From the closing weeks of 2020 through February 1, 2022, more than sixty percent of the world’s population was injected with Covid-19 vaccines.
This means that in a period of less than fourteen months more than 4.7 billion people received at least one Covid shot. Tens of millions received as many as four doses.
The first clinical trial of Covid vaccines was launched in Germany on April 23, 2020 with the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccine. The first country to authorize the use of the vaccine in the general population was the United Kingdom. The UK issued its authorization on December 2, 2020, and this move was quickly followed by dozens of other nations. The United States issued its emergency use authorization on December 11.
This means that the massive global vaccination campaign – which quickly reached a frenzied pitch – was launched less than 8 months from the start of the clinical trials.
To begin administering a vaccine to the general population within such a short trial period was wholly unprecedented in the annals of modern medicine.
To establish that a vaccine is safe, extensive long-term testing must be carried out. This process involves multi-phase clinical trials and observational studies which include large numbers of subjects over time periods measured in years. This thorough and involved process takes at least five years to complete and usually much longer. According to Johns Hopkins University:
“A typical vaccine development timeline takes 5 to 10 years, and sometimes longer, to assess whether the vaccine is safe and efficacious in clinical trials, complete the regulatory approval processes, and manufacture sufficient quantity of vaccine doses for widespread distribution.” [emphasis added]
Only upon satisfactory completion of this involved regimen can a vaccine be considered reasonably safe for mass administration to the general public.
Yet even the completion of this long process does not guarantee that a vaccine is completely safe. After receiving full approval, vaccines continue to be carefully monitored for adverse events in case some vaccinal flaw may have escaped detection during the multi-year trial phase. There have been a number of vaccines that were pulled from the market after they received full approval due to unexpected safety issues. Some of these include vaccines for Rotavirus, Lyme Disease and Whole Cell Pertussis among others.
Therefore, for a vaccine to be justifiably declared “completely safe,” it must undergo at least five years of intensive testing in clinical trials and then several years of monitoring as it is administered in populations at large.
The Covid vaccines, however, were publicly declared to be “completely safe” less than 8 months after the start of human clinical trials. On the normal vaccine trial timeline, month 8 is in Phase 2 of the three-stage clinical trial regime.
The claim that the Covid vaccines were “completely safe,” was, therefore, completely unjustifiable and unsubstantiated. Those who made this claim engaged in a deliberate and unconscionable act of public deception.
And yet this claim was used as the basis for a worldwide campaign in which more than half of Earth’s inhabitants have been injected with experimental pharmaceuticals that did not undergo proper testing.
The phrase “safe and effective” became the de-facto slogan of the planet-wide vaccination enterprise. Believing that the vaccines were “completely safe,” billions of people willingly – and even enthusiastically – lined up to receive their Covid injections.
Needless to say, not everyone was ready to accept the propaganda. Disregarding all reasonable objections, however, many governments decided that universal vaccination was their goal and decided that the unwilling needed to be coerced. This they sought to do through direct vaccines mandates and covid passports or digital certificates. That latter two were designed in such a way as to compel the hesitant to submit to the shots on pain of being excluded from the normal course of societal life.
Government and public health officials justified this drastic approach by repeatedly stating that the vaccines were “completely safe” and effective, and because of this it was okay to force the shots even on those who did not want to take them.
The claim “safe and effective” was thus used as a means of allurement and coercion for the planet-wide Covid vaccination crusade.
We need to pause here and contemplate the enormity of what the vaccinators have “accomplished.” Less than 22 months after the beginning of the clinical trials, they have managed to inject the plurality of mankind with their inadequately tested products. If things were being done properly, right now the vaccine developers would have been gearing for Phase III of clinical trials. This stage normally takes place between months 24 and 48 after the initiation of the trial process. This is how Johns Hopkins University describes what this stage is about:
“Phase III clinical trials are critical to understanding whether vaccines are safe and effective.”
Phase III is where we now find ourselves on the timeline of vaccine development. In the case of the Covid vaccines, however, the testing of Phase III is not being conducted on a selected group of volunteers but on the world’s population.
The billions who have been lured and coerced to participate in this experiment have not been honestly advised of the truth of the situation, i.e., that that the Covid vaccines have not undergone proper trialing and testing and that their safety profile could not be established with any satisfactory level of accuracy. Instead, they were lied to and told that the vaccines were “completely safe.”
Under the normal schedule, the Covid vaccines Phase III trials would be completed in April of 2024. If this phase went without a hitch, April of 2024 would be the earliest that anyone could justifiably start saying that the Covid vaccines are “safe and effective.”
It is as astonishing as it is frightening that this wide-scale, lightning-fast vaccination campaign featuring insufficiently tested substances was allowed to be carried despite the fact that the injections contained a new gene transfer mRNA technology that had never been tried before. Because of the presence of this novel technology, these vaccines should have been approached with great caution and tested with maximum thoroughness and vigor. Astonishingly, this did not happen. Quite on the contrary, some of the most rudimentary components of the customary trial routine were casually dispensed with.
Some fourteen months into this global injectioneering operation, it is obvious that the claim of the vaccines being “complete safe” was not only unsubstantiated but outright false.
Shortly after the vaccinating commenced, reports of severe adverse reactions and deaths started pouring it. Please see the chart below which depicts the explosion of death reports to the US government’s VAERS database. This explosion began in late 2020 which was when the vaccinators began administering their COVID products to the public at large.
Within a couple months, death reports garnered by the Covid injections exceeded the annual record count of any other vaccine in the database’s history. In less than twelve months, the number of deaths related to the Covid injections exceeded the death total recorded in connection with all the other vaccines in the last thirty years.
This is a gruesome count for vaccines that were supposed to be “completely safe.”
Although the vaccinators tried to cover and downplay the devastating side effects of their product, the reality could not be hidden. Myocarditis and pericarditis became a well-documented consequences of the Pfizer and Moderna shots. In December of last year, Astra Zeneca scientists finally admitted something that had been known for many months, i.e., that their vaccine was causing deadly blood clots.
Trying to soften the news as much as they could, this is the headline with which the Mail Online announced this dire fact:
One can get a sense of just how dangerous and deadly these vaccines are from the fact that within twelve months of launching the vaccination campaign more than 1,000 articles and studies appeared in peer-reviewed scientific journals describing various side effects of these pharmaceuticals. Most of the discussed side effects are serious and deadly. They include
- Fatal cerebral haemorrhage
- Venous thrombosis
- Immune thrombocytopenic purpura
- Myopericarditis
- Guillain-Barré syndrome
- Acute venous thromboembolism
- Lymphadenopathy
- Portal vein thrombosis
- T-cell lymphoma
- Aphasia
- Anaphylaxis
- Cardiomyopathy
- Thrombophilia
Injecting more than half of all humankind with inadequately tested, dangerous pharmaceuticals based on a never-before-tried technology while claiming that that they are “completely safe” is an unprecedented mass experiment with the gravest potential consequences. Never before has any government, an international actor or a transnational cabal undertaken an act that would expose such a big swath of humanity to such serious danger.
This operation was carried out under false pretenses and those who initiated it knew that their claims were unsubstantiated and false. The question that must be answered is this: How could something like this been allowed to happen?
Untold millions across the world have already suffered severe side effects from these injections in the short-term. And we do not yet know that the medium- or long-term consequences may be, since these vaccines have not been trialed for such time frames.
Please keep mind that the clinical trials for the Covid vaccines began only less than 22 months ago. In such a short period of time it is simply impossible to adequately assess the safety of any vaccine.
The Covid-19 vaccination crusade is a global crime the like of which the world has not yet seen.
Those complicit in this vast crime against humanity are the vaccine manufacturers, the leaders of the regulatory agencies, public health officials and politicians. Also complicit is the media which endlessly amplified the “completely safe” claim which became the mantra under which this enterprise has been carried out.
Those responsible for this must be called to answer for their deeds in legal settings so that their actions can be evaluated and judged in accordance with national and international laws and statutes.