France: Mosque in Tours is headquarters of an “Islamist movement that has plans to overthrow political regimes in the Arab-Muslim world in order to install Islamist regimes”, according to its own worshippers

Political Islam is denounced by Muslim believers. This was witnessed by France Bleu in Tours on Saturday 22 January. About fifty worshippers of the Bouzignac mosque had gathered to denounce an inappropriate use of the place of worship. The reason for this was the links between the association “Libre échange”, which manages the mosque, and the organisation “Participation et spiritualité musulmanes” (PSM), which, according to the demonstrators, is run by the mosque’s head, Hamid El Archi.

“We have noticed some activities related to PSM inside the mosque. There is no way of knowing what proportions this may take later,” one of the protesters told France Bleu. These believers are worried because PSM is identified as a conservative movement that holds radical positions and is also criticised for being under Moroccan tutelage. On Saturday, its opponents even spoke of an “Islamist movement that has political plans to overthrow political regimes in the Arab-Muslim world in order to install Islamist regimes”. These believers therefore organised themselves in the “Collectif pour la démocratie et la transparence” (Collective for Democracy and Transparency).

When asked by the newspaper La Nouvelle République, Hamid El Archi brushed aside the action of a “tiny minority of people who pretend to provide justice but sow discord”. The local newspaper reported that the mosque was the scene of internal fighting between progressive and radical movements. This situation reflects the struggle being waged at the national level against foreign influence in French mosques, an example of which is the decline of the Conseil français du culte musulman (CFCM).

https://www.valeursactuelles.com/regions/centre-val-de-loire/indre-et-loire/tours/societe/la-mosquee-de-tours-est-un-siege-de-projets-politiques-selon-ses-propres-fideles/

JUST IN: Latest UK Data Shows Covid Infection RATE Among the Triple Jabbed (Boosted) Is HIGHER And RISING FASTER Than The Unvaccinated Across ALMOST EVERY Age Group

Israel: From global jab champion to global new infection champion

The vaccination campaign in Israel continues at full speed. More than half a million Israelis have already had their second booster shot. Nevertheless, the Ministry of Health reported 68 513 new Corona infections within a single day on Thursday.

By comparison, health officials in Germany – with nine times as many inhabitants as Israel – reported 140 840 (not around 600 000) new infections to the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) on the same day.

These figures confirm a recently published study, the results of which were summed up by Gili Regev-Yochay of the Shiba Hospital near Tel Aviv as follows: the second booster had only shown a “modest effect” against Omicron, and the increase in antibodies after the fourth vaccination was “not very impressive”. Shortly after the fourth vaccination, the antibody level was the same as after the third, said Regev-Yochay.

The total failure of the second booster shot also resulted in by far the highest rate with 3 290 infections per 100 000 inhabitants. The USA recorded 1 573, the UK 965 and Hungary 761 infections per 100 000 inhabitants. In Germany, the last seven-day incidence was 706.

Official data from around the world now suggests that the double and triple vaccinated are developing Corona vaccine induced acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, or VAIDS.

https://freewestmedia.com/2022/01/23/israel-from-global-jab-champion-to-global-new-infection-champion/

Germany: Islamist terror supporter not to be expatriated

The committed Muslim Ahmed R. has made a successful start in 2022. In mid-January, the city of Hildesheim overturned a decision by the administrative court in Hanover to revoke his German citizenship. The authorities had previously failed to give him a legal hearing, writes the left-wing Berlin-based newspaper “taz”. His naturalisation in 2014 is therefore still valid.

Ahmed R. has repeatedly caused trouble for the German authorities. Born in Germany, he spent his early youth in Tunisia, where he also got his religious socialisation. Back in Germany, he was one of the founders of the association Deutschsprachiger Islamkreis Hildesheim, where, among others, the well-known Salafist preacher Abu Walaa made an appearance.

Walaa was considered the German head of the Islamic State. His pilgrimage throughout Germany ended after he was sentenced to ten and a half years in prison in early 2021 for membership of a terrorist organisation, financing terrorism and aiding and abetting the preparation of a violent crime that endangers the state.

Other well-known Muslims who met at the Verein Deutschsprachiger Islamkreis Hildesheim were Sven Lau, Pierre Vogel, Abul Baraa and Anis Amri, the attacker at Berlin’s Breitscheidplatz square.

Ahmed R. has been a German citizen since 2014 and had no problems declaring his allegiance to the free democratic basic order. In writing, even. In court in Hanover, he claimed to have always rejected radical tendencies within the association Deutschsprachiger Islamkreis Hildesheim. No one can prove him wrong.

At the end of the proceedings, the city of Hildesheim buckled and cancelled the expatriation order.

https://www.pi-news.net/2022/01/hildesheim-obermuslim-wird-nicht-ausgebuergert/

Boris’s Salvo of Freedom: Johnson Cancels the Pandemic in England

By Vasko Kohlmayer

Last week Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, walked into the British Parliament and made the most consequential statement by a political leader since the fall of the Berlin Wall.

This is what Johnson said in part, to the cheers of the assembled parliamentarians:

“Next week mandatory [vaccine] certification will end… We will end the compulsory use of Covid status certification in England… From now, the government is no longer asking people to work from home and people should now speak to their employers about arrangements for returning to the office… [T]he government will no longer mandate the wearing of face masks anywhere… we will trust the judgement of the British people and no longer criminalise anyone who chooses not to wear one [mask]… There will soon come a time when we can remove the legal requirement to self-isolate altogether – just as we don’t place legal obligations on people to isolate if they have flu… We will set out our long-term strategy for living with Covid-19, explaining how we hope and intend to protect our liberty and avoid restrictions in future by relying instead on medical advances…”

Astonishingly, Boris Johnson made this seminal declaration at the height of the flu season during which Britain has been posting record numbers of Covid cases.

Nevertheless, Boris Johnson decided to cancel the pandemic in England… just like that with a few words. The British Prime Minister ended his nation’s oppressive dystopian nightmare with a few sentences.

It is crucial that we grasp the immense significance of Johnson’s simple act. While Covid runs seemingly wild and other countries are taking increasingly repressive measures against their populations – Austria, for example, intends to fine and jail those who refuse the Covid jabs – Johnson dared to cancel the “pandemic” just when it reached its peak.

By his act, Boris Johnson laid bare the insidiousness of the world’s totalitarians and exposed the global ruling elite’s response to the so-called Covid pandemic for the gargantuan fraud that it is.

By no longer requiring Britons to hide at home, Johnson admitted that the lockdowns were a scam.

By no longer requiring British population to wear face diapers, Johnson admitted that masks were a scam.

By no longer requiring Covid passes, Johnson admitted that the vaccines were a scam (despite his lip service to it).

Even though all this has been obvious for many months now, the totalitarian globalists did their best to promptly silence and ruin anyone who would in any way dare to intimate the truth. Novak Djokovic is one their latest victims.

An elitist himself, Johnson decided to go against the will and mindset of his globalist comrades. Whatever his reasons, his move was an act of simple common sense and great courage.

Johnson is the first leader on the planet to axe restrictive (and thoroughly useless) Covid measures at the crest of a Covid wave.

By his bold move, Boris Johnson fired a mighty salvo of freedom that will reverberate across the world and that will eventually bring down the global Covid tyranny.

For many people Boris Johnson was a bitter disappointment. Portraying himself as a reasonable man and a conservative he was anything but. Initially wanting to follow the Swedish approach of dealing with Fauci’s virus, he changed his position and went over to the dark side. He progressively became a pandemicist, Covidist and finally a vaccinator.

Now, however, Boris has redeemed himself and showed that he is more than just a semi-funny guy with funky hair.

Boris Johnson now holds the honor of being the first major western leader to thoroughly reject Covidism with its onerous dictates of chicanery and oppression.

By exposing its fraudulent nature, Johnson drove a stake through the heart of Covid despotism. Encouraged by his example, other nations will now follow suit.

This was undoubtedly the British Premier’s finest moment. Boris rose to the great challenge of his time and showed that somewhere behind that buffoonish exterior stands a strong man capable of making honest decisions.   

Because of what he did this week, Johnson will go down in history the Great Covid-19 Cancellator. His act of singular courage (for a politician) will earn Johnson a place in the annals of history as one of the brave fighters in mankind’s cause of freedom.

As Boris himself would say, let’s “have a drink.” We, however, cannot rest for long, for there are other great battles to fight against the forces of oppression that threaten to engulf mankind.

The specter of totalitarianism is, indeed, haunting the globe. From Austria to Canada to Australia a ruthless cabal of global elitists, oligarchs and technocrats seek to subjugate and exploit populations for their own purposes and enrichment. The people of the world must wake up and rise against it.

But for now, viva Boris. And long live freedom.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/01/boriss_salvo_of_freedom_johnson_cancels_the_pandemic_in_england.html

Above the law: Austrian politicians not subject their own Corona dictates

It has become quite grotesque to see how little their dictatorial measures apply to them: The Austrian ruling class do not have to suffer the consequences of their Corona policies. This was the case when the President of the National Council, Wolfgang Sobotka (ÖVP), flew to a funeral in Italy without a PCR test. In fact, the parliamentary administration had asked the police at Linz Airport not to carry out any Corona checks on Sobotka.

The Parliamentary Directorate explained Sobotka’s behavior: “The business trips reported by the Parliamentary Directorate by the President of the National Council are not legally subject to the application of the Covid Entry Ordinance”. It was also added that Sobotka was “vaccinated” four times.

This ridiculous answer does not explain how it was possible to circumvent the 2G+ regulation, which applies to all Austrian citizens, even for “business trips”, but it was simply ignored by the Parliamentary Directorate. While Austrians have been subject to compulsory masks, tests and repeated vaccinations, top politicians can apparently do as they please with impunity.

Ordinary citizens have shouldered the horror measures taken by the government, such as a series of compulsory dangerous injections, incessant testing and even by wearing several FFP2 masks at once. Even with a 10-fold booster, normal mortals would probably not be able to take a flight without the legally required valid PCR test. A PCR or antigen test is also required for entry into Italy.

State funeral of vaccinated European Parliament President after immune failure

Sobotka’s flight to a state funeral in Italy is said to have taken place on January 14. Only now has it become known in the media what had happened at the airport in Hörsching. “Why is Sobotka travelling without Covid control?” border control staff wondered.

Sobotka was not tested, neither on the flight to the funeral of the President of the European Parliament, David Sassoli , nor on the return flight. Sassoli, who was reportedly previously treated with the experimental shots, suffered pneumonia last September. In January he died at the age of 65 due to the failure of his immune system in an Italian hospital. The progressive Sassoli was an advocate of jabs, had declared a climate emergency at the World Economic Forum in Davos in January 2020 and urged “transition”. He had evidently been schooled in the newspeak clichés of Agenda 2030.

Sobotka is not the only one

Sobotka is not the first top politician to attract attention with such privileges in the midst of ever stricter Corona measures. After the New Year, Chancellor Karl Nehammer’s image took a nosedive when it was revealed that he had been partying maskless with dozens of friends crammed in a small ski hut in Carinthia after he had pretended he would skip celebrations because of Omicron. He had vowed to spend the evening alone with his dog.

The Chancellery insisted that the infection did not take place in the ski hut when Nehammer suddenly tested positive. The photo was taken on December 29, his spokesman Daniel Kosak claimed on Twitter. The infection took place after Nehammer’s return from vacation on Tuesday.

According to the current state of research, the period between an infection with the Corona virus and its first detectability (latency period) is estimated at 2.5 to 4 days. The Robert Koch Institute (RKI) assumes a latency period of 3 days. A period of 4 to 9 days is assumed until the first symptoms appear (incubation period).

His unsolicited declaration that he was infected by a security guard on Wednesday evening raised more questions than it answered. As a result, all sorts of special rules suddenly applied to him and his entourage.

Faking injections

Already in November, Eva-Maria Himmelbauer (ÖVP) shocked with her attaching a fake vaccination card sticker in broad daylight, during a National Council session. Caught on ORF cameras, she was spotted attaching a vaccination batch sticker to her yellow vaccination card and told Wochenblick that it was a “flu vaccination”.

When Wochenblick asked for a photo as proof of  her statement, Himmelbauer ignored the request. And even though she was caught red-handed, she has never faced the consequences of her actions. If, on the other hand, Austrian citizens are suspected of cheating with the Corona jab certificates, they have to fear brutal persecution by the authorities and up to two years in prison if they are convicted of falsifying documents.

https://freewestmedia.com/2022/01/23/above-the-law-austrian-politicians-not-subject-their-own-corona-dictates/

Éric Zemmour: France’s Last Chance for Survival?

Paris, December 18, 2021. The Algerian national soccer team wins the Arab Cup in Qatar. Tens of thousands of Algerian supporters, waving Algerian flags, rush ontothe Champs-Élysées in Paris. Shop windows are smashed. The unrest lasts until nightfall. Slogans are shouted: “Long live Algeria”, “By Allah, the Koran!” — and also “Fu*k France!” and “Fu*k Zemmour!” The police are ordered not to intervene. They are attacked anyway.

The next day, Jean Messiha, a former member of the National Rally Party, noteson television: “The great replacement and the ethnic hatred, we can see them”.

Éric Zemmour, a Jewish candidate for the French presidency, does not comment. He simply states in an interview: “sadly banal scenes”.

Ten days earlier, December 8, in Nanterre, a few miles east of Paris, a Catholic procession organized to celebrate the Feast of the Immaculate Conception was assaulted by young Muslims, who shouted insults and threats. The Catholics were called kuffar (“infidels”). “Wallah [I swear] on the Koran, we will cut your throat”, a young man shouted to a priest, then spat on him. “This is the land of Allah”, others shouted; “go away.”

Incidents such as these have become common in France. Even more violent ones have taken place in the recent past. France is the only country in Europe where a teacher on a street was beheaded with a butcher’s knife because a student accused him of disrespecting the Islamic prophet Muhammad. France is also the only country in Europe where a priest was murdered in a church while saying mass. In the post-WWII era, France is the only country in Europe where Jewish children were murdered in the courtyard of a Jewish school. France also has the largest number of “no-go zones” (more than 750) in Europe.

France is now a country where Christians and Jews are insulted and assaulted so frequently that the newspapers only report it if someone is killed or wounded.

France’s no-go zones should be called “shariah zones.” They are ruled by radical imams, and Muslim gangs who live off theft and drug trafficking. Although most of the residents are French citizens, most do not define themselves as French, but as citizens of the Middle Eastern countries from which they come. They do not accept any Jewish or Christian presence, and most of the Jews and Christians who lived there left to live elsewhere years ago. The police do not enter, and the authorities even consider it dangerous when fire engines and ambulances enter.

For at least four decades, successive French governments have avoided talking about the situation or have said that the problem was poverty, which could be solved by welfare payments or sending in psychologists and sociologists. However, the situation has only gotten worse. Those in charge avoid talking about Islam or say that Islam “has its place” in France and is now a “French religion.”

French President Emmanuel Macron has said that he wants to do more than his predecessors and has promised to fight what he calls “Islamic separatism“. He says that all the troubles come from a small handful of Islamists, whom he defined as followers of “radical movements unrelated to Islam”, and who have been incited to live apart from other French people by dangerous troublemakers who are betraying the Muslim faith. Macron therefore continues to refuse to face anything “inconvenient”.

According to a poll published in September 2020, 74% of French Muslims under the age of 25 said the laws of Islam were more important than the laws of the French Republic. Another poll published two months later showed that 57% of French Muslims under the age of 25 wanted to live under Islamic sharia law.

The polls also showed that Muslim gangs who live in the no-go zones and engage in the drug trade also carry out theft and looting operations against businesses run by non-Muslims close to those zones. The lawlessness spurs these non-Muslims to sell their businesses to Muslims, who risk neither looting nor threats. The gang members say that when they steal and loot, they only “take the jizya“, an Islamic “protection” tax levied on non-Muslims in territories ruled by Islamic law.

For years, those who dared explicitly to describe the situation have been taken to court, accused by anti-racist organizations of “Islamophobic racism”, then sentenced to heavy fines. Ten years ago, in 2011, the author Renaud Camus published a bookLe grand remplacement (“The Great Replacement”), which said that Muslim civilization was replacing French civilization and that this substitution was accompanied, for non-Muslims, by violence and a lack of security. Camus did not just pay fines. He was no longer invited on radio or television, and all French publishers said they would no longer publish his books. He now self- publishes.

Another author and journalist, Éric Zemmour, also wrote the same thing and was often sentenced — also for “Islamophobic racism” — to heavy fines . His books, however, were best-sellers, and the talk shows that invited him had enormous success — which protected him. Radio and television stations, and the newspaper that published his views, did not fire him.

This in the context in which Zemmour’s decision to run for the presidency of France needs to be understood.

La France n’a pas dit son dernier mot (“France Has Not Said Its Last Word”), the book Zemmour published in September 2021, describes his disappointing conversations with French political leaders. No one has disputed a word he wrote. He organized meetings throughout the country to explain what he thought needed to be done and declared his candidacy on November 30, by posting a video on YouTube.

What Zemmour said contrasted sharply with that of his competitors. He did not try to please or water down any facts. He spoke of the destruction of France:

“France is no longer France, and everyone sees it… The third-worlding of our country and our people impoverishes as much as it disintegrates, ruins as much as it torments”.

He emphasized the lack of courage of French politicians:

“I saw that no politician had the courage to save our country from the tragic fate that awaits it. I saw that all these supposed professionals were, above all, impotent”.

Explaining his decision, he said:

“I have decided to ask for your vote to become your President of the Republic, so that our children and grandchildren do not know barbarism. So that our daughters are not veiled and our sons are not forced to submit”.

Zemmour created a political party and called it Reconquest, seen by some as a reference to the Reconquista, the reconquest of Spain by Christians after centuries of Muslim occupation.

For a few weeks, he succeeded in placing the question of the survival of France and of its civilization at the center of every debate. Each time the media invited him to speak, he tirelessly repeated that what is at stake the survival of France, and that the election of 2022 could be the last chance to save the country. He spoke of the risk of a civil war: “I do not want France to become a Lebanon on a large scale”, he said.

The other presidential candidates were then forced to raise the same questions he was asking but they did not answer them. Marine Le Pen, president of the National Rally Party, said that Zemmour was too pessimistic and divided the French. Valerie Pecresse, the candidate chosen by the moderate right-wing party, The Republicans, simply said that “Éric Zemmour is an accomplice of the far right. I belong to a right which has built a dike against the far right”. The left-wing candidates refused to answer altogether and said that Zemmour was a “fascist”.

The French mainstream media who invited Zemmour also had to raise the questions he was asking; almost all said that he was excessive, obsessive, and that France was not in danger.

Today, “anti-racist” and French Muslim organizations continue to describe Zemmour as a racist. Francis Kalifat, president of the Representative Council of Jewish Institutions of France (CRIF), said that no Jew should vote for Zemmour, and Yonathan Arfi, CRIF’s vice-president, wrote, “As Jews, we are of course not responsible for what Éric Zemmour says. But we have a responsibility to stand in their way”. Haim Korsia, the Chief Rabbi of France, even declared that Zemmour, who defines himself as a “Berber Jew“, is an “anti-Semite”.

President Macron never speaks of Zemmour, but members of the government and leaders of The Republic on the Move, the party created by Macron in 2017, do — and in strong words. Minister of Health Olivier Veran said that “Éric Zemmour embodies rejection, racism and xenophobia”, and is in a “permanent state of delirium”. Former Minister of the Interior Christophe Castaner said that Zemmour “insults the French people every day”.

The presidential elections in France take place in two rounds. In the first round, there are many candidates — officially 24 candidates for the presidential election of 2022, most of whom will get 1%-2% of the vote. In the second round, only the two leading candidates compete.

Until Zemmour declared his candidacy, the polls indicated that in the second round, President Macron would face Marine Le Pen, and easily win. Her father, Jean-Marie Le Pen, was several times condemned for anti-Semitic remarks. Even though she has done her best to show that she is totally different from her father and not at all anti-Semitic, she still bears his name, which seems to be an insurmountable handicap. In an effort to change her image, she even watered down her positions, evidently to no avail.

From September to mid-December 2021, polls showed that in the second round of the election, Zemmour could well be Macron’s opponent. Since mid-December, however, the polls have changed, and Marine Le Pen, Valerie Pecresse and Éric Zemmour are tied. It is therefore possible that Le Pen could make it to the second round. If that happens, the result is the same one expected before Zemmour’s candidacy – and Macron will be re-elected. If Valerie Pecresse makes it to the second round, Macron will also be reelected: her positions are close to Macron’s, meaning that the voters wishing a more conservative policy will probably not vote for her. “Valerie Pecresse has the same ideas as Emmanuel Macron and is unable to defeat him”, said Guillaume Peltier, vice president of The Republicans Party on January 10. “Only Eric Zemmour has a chance”. The day before, on January 9, Peltier left The Republicans to join the Zemmour campaign.

If Zemmour makes it to the second round, Macron still stands a good chance of being re-elected. Macron whips up the fear of Covid-19. The rules imposed on the French population are still extremely strict. France is in a state of “health emergency,” and police who enforce compliance have extensive powers of control. A vaccination passport has been put in place; only fully vaccinated people can go to restaurants, cafes, movies or take a train. The police can ask for vaccination passports and identity documents everywhere, except in one’s home. Every day, the front pages of newspapers are devoted to the pandemic and the number of cases. People hospitalized and deaths are shown in large print. Television news is also largely devoted to the pandemic. When Macron speaks, it is almost only about the pandemic. Political analysts apparently think that if he manages to avoid all other topics, his reelection will be a certainty. If he does not, everything could turn out any which way.

A recent poll shows that a large majority of French people — 60% —approve of the use of the vaccine passport and the strict rules in place. The fear of illness and death remains intense.

The polls, however, also show that the ideas at the heart of Zemmour’s campaign are widely shared by the French. One polling institute recently asked a sampling of French people:

“Some people speak of the great replacement, European, white and Christian populations being threatened with extinction following Muslim immigration from the Maghreb and black Africa. Do you think such a phenomenon will occur in France?”

67% of respondents answered: Yes. The poll then asked whether respondents worry about the possibility of a great replacement. 67% of people answered: Yes. 63% per cent responded that that they thought Islam was a danger for France.

Journalists who commented on the poll said, “The great replacement is a fantasy”. Many French people clearly disagree.

Zemmour said during a recent radio show, “No, the great replacement is not a fantasy”. He gave figures:

“Four hundred thousand Muslim immigrants enter France each year. In five years, that makes two million more Muslims. These Muslims go to live in the Muslim areas and do not integrate… What do you think that means?”

Instead of answering, the journalists interviewing him changed the subject. The figures he gave are taken from official documents; they are exact.

He also spoke about his own experiences. On October 25, 2021, TV host Jean-Marc Morandini invited him to meet the inhabitants of Drancy, a small town in the eastern suburbs of Paris where Zemmour had spent his childhood. In the 1960s, Zemmour recalled, French middle-class people, and many Jews who had left Algeria in 1962 at the end of the French-Algerian War, had lived there. At the time, he continued, life in Drancy was calm and peaceful. Now, Morandini said, there is no longer a single Jewish family in Drancy; it is today a predominantly Muslim city, like many towns around, and that in 2017 there had been riots accompanied by claims of “police brutality”. In Aulnay-sous-Bois a neighboring town of Drancy, a young criminal of African descent, Theodore Luhaka, had violently resisted the police officers arresting him and accused them of sexual assault. The entire eastern suburbs of Paris were on fire for a week. The police officers were fired, charged, then cleared by the judiciary. Then President François Hollande supportedLuhaka, not the police.

Zemmour was only able to walk around the city protected by a dozen armed police officers. He met just a few people, all hostile. A crowd shouting “Zemmour go away” and “Allahu Akbar” followed him. When he entered a Muslim butcher shopand asked the butcher if there was a non-Muslim butcher shop in the city, the butcher replied: “A French butcher shop? I think there is one left in the French quarter”. “There is still a French quarter in Drancy?” Zemmour said.

On November 26, 2021, Zemmour tried to visit Marseille. Everywhere he went he was greeted with cries of “Allahu Akbar”. Young Muslims verbally threatened him. The restaurant where he was to have lunch was totally ransacked. The police did not try to protect it. Marseille’s population is now 40% Muslim. Analysts predict that in less than a decade, Marseille — the second-largest city in France — will be predominantly Muslim.

The public meeting Zemmour organized to launch his campaign on December 5, 2021 was protected by hundreds of police officers. The people who came were greeted by groups shouting, “Allahu Akbar” and “Zemmour the fascist”. A man in the large hall where the meeting took place assaulted Zemmour and tried to strangle him. Zemmour’s bodyguards handed him over to the police; he was charged with intentional bodily harm. Thirteen thousand people were present. In his speech, Zemmour told them, “They hate me because they hate you”.

Journalist Ivan Rioufol wrote in Le Figaro, “What is the candidate saying except that it is urgent to try to save dying France and listen to the concerns of the despised French people?”

“If Macron is re-elected,” Zemmour said on television on January 13, “civil war is almost certain. Many French people know it”.

On April 21, 2021, 1,200 professional soldiers, including 20 generals, published an open letter in the weekly Valeurs Actuelles, saying the same thing. Macron did not react, but Minister of Defense Florence Parly announced that the signatories were “irresponsible” and would be heavily sanctioned. Many of those still active were relieved of their duties. A month later, on May 11, Valeurs Actuelles publishedanother open letter, signed this time by thousands of professional soldiers who asked that their names not be made public. The text is explicit:

“We see violence in our cities and towns. We see communitarianism taking hold in the public space, in public debate. We see hatred of France and its history becoming the norm… You abandon, without reacting, entire districts of our country to the law of the strongest… if a civil war breaks out, the army will maintain order on its own soil…. No one can want such a terrible situation… but yes, once again, civil war is brewing in France and you know it perfectly well”.

Valeurs Actuelles made the open letter into a petition. Within a few hours, thousands of French people had signed it. Again, Macron did not react. To date, he has not changed his position. He does not speak of the crisis in France.

Mainstream media journalists and political enemies of Zemmour, however, scrutinize every word to find excuses to attack him. On January 15, during a meeting with teachers and students’ parents, Zemmour said he thought that disabled children should be educated in special establishments and added: “these children are completely overwhelmed… So I think we need specialized teachers who take care of them”. Rather than taking into account the real difficulties of which he was speaking, Sophie Cluzel, the Secretary of State in charge of People with Disabilities accused him of wanting to “remove disabled children from the schools of the republic” and to “reject differences”. Marine Le Pen accusedZemmour of “attacking children weakened by a disability”. Valerie Pecresse said: “my project is more inclusion for disabled children”. Zemmour, on January 15, replied that he had received the support of thousands of parents of disabled children who said they had felt abandoned by the government. He accused his critics of hypocrisy and lies, and stressed that he intended to remedy the lack of schools specializing in the care of disabled children.

Other attacks will undoubtedly follow whatever statements he makes. On January 17, a judge sentenced Eric Zemmour to a fine (10,000 euros, $11,350) for “incitement to racial hatred” for having said on September 29, 2020, on a television talk show that foreign “unaccompanied minors” in France are neither isolated nor minors, and commit many crimes. Police reports show that to be correct. Zemmour had not talked about race. The sentence will doubtless be overturned, but for a few days France’s mainstream media had the opportunity to say that Zemmour had been sentenced again for “racism”.

When Zemmour was a journalist, he was universally hated by advocates of political correctness. They tried relentlessly to destroy him, without success. Now that he is a candidate for the presidency, those who hated him appear to hate him even more and are ready to redouble their efforts to destroy him. When the French presidential campaign begins in earnest in February, the attacks will most likely intensify.

Despite them, other serious politicians have been signing on. Guillaume Peltier was only the first: Jérôme Rivière head of the National Rally faction in the European Parliament came on board on January 19, as did Gilbert Collard, one of the leaders of the National Rally, on January 22. Perhaps a trend is taking shape?

https://freewestmedia.com/2020/01/05/ardennes-young-disabled-person-lynched-by-group-of-north-africans/

Crosses to disappear from Switzerland’s largest cemetery because they upset “other religions”

There has been a dispute about the cross for years. Time and again, the symbol causes controversy, even though Christians see it as a sign of reconciliation, tolerance and love of one’s neighbour.
There is currently a dispute about this in Riehen, the second largest town in northern Switzerland with a proportion of foreigners of around 28 per cent. Switzerland’s largest cemetery is located at Hörnli in Riehen.
According to the administration of the central cemetery, more and more people of other faiths feel disturbed by crosses, Christian murals and even chapel names during funerals and ceremonies. The Catholic Church of Basel-Stadt is even showing itself to be compliant.

The spokesperson for the church council told the newspaper Basler Zeitung: “If there are people who consider Christian symbols disturbing in the process, it should be possible to cover them up or carry them out.”
The Protestant Reformed of Basel see things differently. Their church does not need any religious symbols. Nevertheless, the president thinks: “Those to whom these symbols are important should be able to experience and see them.
There is strong resistance to the displacement of Christian symbols. The SVP party Riehen is fighting to preserve the cemetery culture. In a petition, it calls on parliament and the government council to stop such plans.

The representatives of the Basel Catholics complain: “If the basic furnishings of a chapel are to be without Christian symbols, this is a worrying trend”.
In 2018, the newly elected Bavarian Prime Minister Markus Söder had a cross hung in his Munich state chancellery in one of his first official acts. Ten years earlier, when he was secretary-general of the Christian Social Union (CSU), Söder had made a mess of things with a single sentence: “Crucifixes belong in classrooms, not headscarves.

https://weltwoche.ch/daily/basler-zoffen-um-christliche-symbole-kreuze-sollen-aus-dem-groessten-schweizer-friedhof-verschwinden/