Month: January 2022

Germany continues to shower the world with “innovations”. One notable one is the latest advance of the traffic-light coalition, composed of old SPD leftists and new Greens: You can finally choose your own gender.

This has not been possible for thousands of millennia, but the Scholz administration is not afraid of setting a new milestone for mankind. And whoever thought that gender was determined by genes only and cannot be changed, may not believe the good news.

Sadly in Berlin, despite the liberating free choice of gender, discrimination is still rife. A headline in the Berliner Tagesspiegel, a newspaper that is completely dedicated to the fight against the ubiquitous Nazi, drew attention to this plight. The newspaper, which is also supported by taxpayers’ money, headlined the terrible inequality: “Berlin students demand menstrual products for all genders”.

The article, which is unfortunately only available behind a “binary” payment barrier, goes on to say: “The General Student Committee (AStA) of the Technical University of Berlin demands menstrual products in all toilets of the university, i.e. pads and tampons.”

The committee is also quoted as saying: “We explicitly demand that these are not only provided in women’s toilets, but in all toilets for all genders.”

The students “also place their proposal in a larger revolutionary context: ‘On the way to an equal and queer/feminist society in which capitalist, patriarchal, anti-women, trans, inter and queer exclusions are reduced, this is only a very small step’.”

Finally Berlin’s men may wake up tomorrow morning without having to worry that they are massively discriminated against because there are no tampons and pads provided in men’s toilets because gender is just a “social construct”. And since this proposal fails due to elementary logic, it also qualifies as “woke” which means laughter, disbelief and mockery at the suggestion will soon be punishable by law.

In buying a trial subscription for the Tagesspiegel readers should however beware that they are only allowed to choose between “Mr” and “Ms” – in contravention of Berlin’s new woke gender fluidity rules.

https://freewestmedia.com/2022/01/21/berlin-students-demand-menstrual-products-for-all-genders/

When I was born, there were 2.4 billion people on Earth, and that number has more than tripled since then, and if I live a bit more, it might quadruple in my lifetime. People before the Industrial Revolution had no experience of population growth: when someone died, the population of the Earth was essentially the same as when they were born, and at most the epidemics changed it a bit. The average number of children born in a family, varied around five to six, similar to what is currently the case in sub-Saharan Africa. Of course, mortality was also high, so that produced an essentially unchanged or barely growing population.

The Industrial Revolution — which saw coal as a source of energy far surpassing previous energy sources (wind and hydropower, animal and human power), and the development of technical inventions (including agricultural ones) along with improved sanitation and health care — significantly increased humans’ lifespan and reduced mortality rates. The global population exploded higher.

In different continents, but we could also say that in cultures, population growth was different. In Europe, which was at the forefront of technological development, the overall fertility rate fell in parallel with the gradual development, and thus, although there was a significant increase in population compared to the pre-industrial era, there was no population explosion.

Population growth in the 17th century was only 0.2 percent a year, gradually accelerating to 1 percent in the first half of the 20th century, and since then, Europe, even with strong immigration, began to stagnate. The U.N. estimates that world population growth will peak at around 11 billion people in the year 2100, about 3 billion more than at present.

The increase will primarily come from the sub-Saharan region. Asia’s population is barely changing, but its structure is, with China declining by about 400 million and India and Pakistan growing by 100 million respectively. The population of North America is growing by 120 million and that of the European Union is declining by 60 million, mainly thanks to Poland, Germany, Italy and Spain. The population in Hungary is expected to decline by three million by 2100.

As the demographic structure transforms and developing countries, especially in Asia, catch up, the weight of the advanced industrialized countries that previously dominated the world economy will diminish. For example, the European Union once accounted for half of world trade, a third of world GDP, but today these figures are one-third and a quarter. This trend will continue and converge to population ratios, which points to a significant rearrangement of geopolitical conditions in the coming decades.

If we cannot change the rate of 1.5 that characterizes the union, and the current immigration of around one million people a year continues, by the end of the century, with the total population declining, the proportion of the Muslim population will reach 40 percent on average. Because of this unequal distribution, it means that some countries in Western Europe will already have a Muslim majority. If we want to replace the declining population with immigrants, it will need 1.5 million immigrants a year, and by the end of the century, nearly 60 percent of the Union’s population will be Muslim, changing the face of Western Europe forever.

The former socialist countries, where the proportion of the Muslim population — with the exception of Bulgaria — is less than 0.5 percent, still have a choice today: to follow the Western path or try to break away and build an independent, self-sustaining economy and society.

https://rmx.news/european-union/stagnant-fertility-rates-and-exponential-immigration-will-change-the-demographic-of-europe-forever/

France’s vaccine passport will come into force on Monday, announced Prime Minister Jean Castex. The unvaccinated will be banned from most public venues. The French government is doubling down on a crumbling global narrative of “safe and effective” vaccines.

Those who choose to remain unjabbed will be banned from domestic flights, restaurants, sports events and other venues. The vaccine passport is key to stopping the Omicron variant from spreading, Castex claimed, seemingly totally immune to reason.

According to French Patriots Party leader Florian Philippot, the only purpose of a “health pass” is to sell more doses of the faulty pharmaceutical product. “Who gets how much? What collusion? What conflicts of interest? Systemic corruption?” Philippot demanded. These are the questions which are not being answered by the interested parties, he said. “These are the real questions of a commission of enquiry that would like to get to the bottom of the vaccine pass.”

Philippot added: “The level of wonderment of most of the media this morning at the Castex press conference confirms how far we have fallen into banana tyranny! It’s almost funny all this dripping propaganda! Even Kim Jong-un couldn’t dream of it.”

The Patriots leader highlighted the numbingly stupid decrees of the Macron administration: “They say ‘it is forbidden to eat standing up’. Then they say ‘it will be allowed to eat standing up in a month’. And they sell it as ‘easing restrictions’ by voting for a mandatory health pass anyway. To break this infernal cycle, you just need to turn your neurons back on.”

Exporting stupid ideas from France

Emmanuel Macron has been hiding behind Castex who pushes vaccine sales. On Wednesday however, he expressed “some important considerations” at the beginning of the six-month French EU Council Presidency in Strasbourg – airing some stale convictions “that make up our common agenda”, as he said at the beginning of his speech designed to impress French voters.

Instead of ditching the vaccine passport like British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, the French president called for a “right to abortion” to be enshrined in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights – apparently not just a dig at the new President of Parliament Roberta Metsola, who is known as an abortion critic, but also at conservative-governed countries like Poland.

Macron framed his demand in the usual way: First, it was necessary to “consolidate” the “European values”. Without irony, he then pointed out that the death penalty was forbidden in the Charter of Fundamental Rights. The right to kill unborn life is therefore on a par with the right not to be killed. And not a word about vaccine-induced deaths. His silence was indeed deafening.

The French leader further underscored his mediocrity by droning on about the “protection of the environment”. Protection of the environment but not protection of life? By now any sane individual would have laughed out loud at the contradictions. And finally he summed up “our political project”.

In his speech, Macron also spoke of “respect” for the “uniqueness and identity of everyone”, of the “sovereignty of peoples”. He evidently thought this mind-searing contradiction jibed with his regulatory fantasies and upped his chances of being viewed by voters as a serious candidate for re-election.

In addition, Macron’s statements once again pointed to the dangerous development that the European Union has been taking away from subsidiarity towards more and more centralized regulations. Because the French president also called for a European minimum wage, new employee rights and more women on supervisory boards.

EU Commission President wants mandatory shots too

The demand for an EU-wide quota for women was raised just a week ago by Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.

In December, she had already drawn attention to herself with another statement: Getting carried away by the hysterical debate in Germany, she suggested an EU-wide general vaccination requirement. Austria’s National Council passed a mandatory vaccination law on Friday, cementing their Corona dictatorship.

The EU that rules from Brussels to make health decisions for more than 400 million people, to set wages uniformly and to execute the supposedly necessary socio-political liberalization in all member countries? That would be a nightmare for its inhabitants.

Adults are no longer in charge in France

Ironically Luxembourg, not France, invited one of the world’s most renowned specialists of infectious diseases, public health and vaccines: Christian Perronne, a French doctor and university professor. He specializes in tropical diseases and emerging infectious diseases. He was Chair of the Technical Committee on Communicable Diseases of the High Council of Public Health in France, long-time Chair of the Technical Committees on Vaccination and Vice-Chair of the WHO Vaccine Expert Group for the WHO Euro-Zone (including Asia and Russia).

He was a guest of the Luxembourg Parliament on Thursday 13 January 2022. He began his hearing with a brief account of his outstanding professional career in the field of health, epidemics and vaccines and reminded his audience that despite his knowledge of the field, he is now being derided as a “conspiracist” in France.

In just eight minutes, Professor Perronne, blew up the narrative of Macron and his gang of jab junkies. According to the esteemed professor, the French government has paid more than $3 billion to the media over the last 2 years, invested absolutely nothing in hospitals and ignored science.

“These are not vaccinations, they do not work. They neither prevent infections nor severe illness. In the countries that have vaccinated the most, over 90 percent of people in intensive care units are double or triple vaccinated.

“According to official databases, 36 000 people have died as a result of vaccinations in Europe and 25 000 in the USA, not forgetting athletes.” Peronne noted that many more children have died because of the shots than of Covid itself.

“Oncologists in the US have also noted an increase in deaths among cancer patients following vaccination. And it is clear that the numbers of Covid deaths have been inflated,” he added.

Professor Perronne has published two books on the subject: Décidement ils n’ont toujours pas compris [You really still don’t understand] and Y a-t-il une erreur qu’ils n’ont pas commise? [Is there a mistake you haven’t made yet?].

https://freewestmedia.com/2022/01/21/france-shuns-evidence-of-massive-vaccine-failure/

In October 2021, the first anniversary of the death of Samuel Paty, a teacher beheaded by an Islamist terrorist, there were many tributes and some incidents in schools in France. In Valence (Drôme), a pupil had shouted “Allah Akbar” during a minute’s silence, France Bleu reported. The 11-year-old had apologised, but his father had praised him and then threatened the school staff. On Thursday January 20, he was sentenced to six months in prison, suspended for two years, and banned from showing up at school.

“The accused, Hamid A, had retired as a young man. A, a 40-year-old man who was then a night watchman and is now unemployed. When informed of his son’s behaviour, he had threatened to set fire to the school or staff members’ cars and announced violence. During the trial, he justified his behaviour with the racism he blames on the education system and explained that he had feared that his son would be “branded as a terrorist”, recorded or imprisoned. The man affirmed that he condemned the murder of Samuel Paty, but also the tributes to him, and defended himself against the accusation of an ideological motivation, as France Bleu reports.

“The problem is your foolish behaviour,” the presiding judge countered, while the lawyer for the joint plaintiffs criticised the defendant’s unwillingness to question his behaviour. His conviction was combined with a commitment to treatment and 700 EUR in damages for the three threatened teachers.

https://www.valeursactuelles.com/faits-divers/allah-akbar-durant-lhommage-a-samuel-paty-le-pere-qui-avait-felicite-son-fils-et-menace-le-personnel-condamne/

Je viens d’être agressé par des militants antifascistes à Paris. J’ai été exfiltré précipitamment et je me trouve désormais en sécurité.

— Tanguy David (@tanguy_france) January 20, 2022

Je l'ai toujours dit : les "antifas" sont des groupuscules violents et parfois armés, que je qualifie de terroristes de l'intérieur car prêts à tout pour se débarrasser de ceux qui ne sont pas de leur avis. L'État doit traiter ces individus comme tel. #Greve20Janvier

— Tanguy David (@tanguy_france) January 20, 2022

Il s'agit manifestement d'un membre de la "Jeune Garde Antifasciste". pic.twitter.com/YV0NODD3iO

— Tanguy David (@tanguy_france) January 20, 2022

Sans surprise, le même genre de compte. pic.twitter.com/37UnsfK4Ir

— Tanguy David (@tanguy_france) January 20, 2022

https://www.fdesouche.com/2022/01/20/racisme-une-influenceuse-et-militante-black-lives-matter-traite-un-soutien-deric-zemmour-de-noir-de-service/

By James Stansbury

A recent article introduced the term “negative efficacy” regarding COVID vaccines and implied that this reaction explains why more vaccinated than unvaccinated people are getting sick with COVID.   A non-Google search turned up several articles about negative efficacy that confirmed the claim with more details.  The most detailed article made the following points:

“It [negative efficacy] doesn’t mean the protection wears off (like we were told). It means the OPPOSITE of what you were told: it means the vaccines helps the virus to infect you (by suppressing your immune system, probably permanently each time we are injected according to Dr. Ryan Cole).”

“In short, we’ve been lied to about the vaccine. It is protecting you less and less over time. While you may get a benefit for earlier variants, the benefit for other variants (and likely other diseases) is going to be negative. In short, you are getting a short term benefit against Delta, but at the expense of a degradation of your overall immunity to everything else.”

To test the above hypothesis, trend data from Our World in Data was used to compare five different countries.  For simplicity I focused only on vax rate, the number new cases and confirmed COVID deaths.    The U.S. was selected for obvious reasons followed by the U.K. because it had the somewhat stricter lockdowns like most of Europe.  Australia was added because of the intensity of its lockdowns, mask and vax mandates.  Admittedly, Australia did have success using these tyrannical police state methods to minimize the damage from COVID at least until now.   

Sweden is there because of its notoriously minimal lockdowns followed by praise for its success in achieving natural herd immunity well before any other Western country.  India was added because it alone appears to have tamed COVID from day one by using common, inexpensive therapeutics in its early outpatient protocols (notably hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin) and much less reliance on vaccines.  Except for one surge in hospitalizations and deaths due to the emergence of the delta variant, India has experienced far fewer total deaths relative to its population.

Vaccination Rates:  Notice that Australia and Sweden now rank highest although both started their vax campaigns much later than either the U.S or the U.K. while India arrived very late to the vax party.    

Daily New Confirmed COVID Cases:  Things are looking grim for the start of 2022!  However, we know much more testing is being done now and this could partially explain the surge.  Note that only India with its lower vax rate has not skyrocketed with new cases, but likely tests less.  Of interest, the three countries with highest vax rates also surged up the most with Australia exploding past all. 

Daily New Confirmed COVID Deaths:  Obviously, deaths are the most important metric and will lag behind new cases by at least two weeks and sometimes a month or more.  However, notice that COVID deaths in every country except India has spiked upward almost in unison.  You can continue to monitor the same daily death rates here.

Some Key Takeaways: 

1. The more contagious, but far less deadly omicron variant plus more frequent testing are likely driving cases up.  However, the totally unexpected increase in deaths is concerning.  The winter season may explain some of it, except Australia where it is their summer. 
2. These data confirm the countries with high vax and booster rates correlate with the JAN 2022 increase in cases and deaths.  This confirms the most likely cause is the claimed negative efficacy effect from the overuse of the original vaccines.  In other words, the original vaccines are now causing more harm than good.   
3. Sweden’s herd immunity success is now busted, likely because of its belated decision to force vaccinations when almost everyone there was already protected by natural immunity.
4. Australia’s unexpected surge in cases and deaths suggests its draconian lockdowns and other mandates have delayed, but totally failed to keep COVID away.  Costly universal lockdowns regardless of how extreme serve only to delay the inevitable.
5. Only India’s exceptionally low death rate is unaffected at least so far, but its climbing vax rate if continued is a concern.
6. The world needs to immediately cease relying on the original vaccines and learn to live with the virus.  For people infected, follow India’s example by approving the emergency use of similar early treatment therapeutics to stop the progression of the disease before it can reach the stage resulting in hospitalization or death.
7. Obviously, more in-depth research by professional immunologists with much more expertise than mine will be required to confirm these findings. 

Let’s face it.  The virus has reached the stage where it is now endemic and will be with us forever just like the related common cold and seasonal flu.  It’s time for us to resume living our lives without the continual government fearmongering,  virtue-signaling, and freedom robbing COVID mandates.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/01/why_the_vaccines_dont_work.html

The Social Democrats’ new chancellor, Olaf Scholz, may be known as the silent man of German power-politics, yet newly revealed Stasi files literally speak volumes on his behalf. The content of the former East German intelligence agency’s files is unlikely to be information that Scholz would be happy to repeat, but according to the author of the study, the chancellor’s past can explain a lot about his current, mostly foreign policy-related decisions.

German Historian Hubertus Knabe has published a study entitled “The Scholz Files,” in which he ventures out to explain why, for instance, Scholz seems to be so reluctant to make a resolute stance against a resurgent Russia, while both his coalition partners are keen on isolating and punishing Vladimir Putin’s government. Left-wing German newspapers have rather predictably cried conspiracy over the new revelations, with the Suddeutsche Zeitung, for example, suggesting that the study used catchphrases to evoke false accusations against their preferred chancellor.

However, the documents clearly depict Scholz in his youth as an unflinching self-declared Marxist and a communist sympathizer, who had friends in high places in the GDR. While a deputy president of the Young Socialists (Jusos) West-German student movement in the 1980s, his views appeared to be very close to that of the GDR’s leadership and the Kremlin.

His chief campaign target was the positioning of US nuclear missiles in Germany, originally a response to Russia’s development, and deployment of the SS-20 intermediate ballistic missiles in East Germany and Czechoslovakia. Documents show that Scholz put the responsibility for the nuclear escalation entirely on the shoulders of “U.S. aggression,” but has never criticized the presence of Russian nuclear weapons in Germany’s immediate neighborhood.

Scholz visited the GDR numerous times in the 1980s, and was willing to lend himself to the Communist Party’s broadcast propaganda, appearing to legitimize the regime on television programs as well as in communist newspapers. On one occasion, rather embarrassingly, the SPD’s communist youth-wing leader, then still sporting a long curly haircut, was made to sit during a television show under the portrait of Communist Party leader Ernst Thälmanns, who during the years of the Weimar Republic (1919-1933), described the SPD as “social fascists.”

During Scholz’s youth movement years, in the federal executive committee of the SPD, he also explained that the topic of leaving NATO is a valid point worth debating in the Jusos. Furthermore, he, along with his comrades from the East, called for the immediate withdrawal of NATO missiles from Germany. For issuing similar statements, the East German authorities praised Scholz as belonging to the most “consistent” part of the SPD, the ones most willing to cooperate with the communists.

Scholz remained at the top of the Young Socialists until 1988, and was considered as faction leader of the so called Stamokap, the wing closest to the Eastern communist bloc’s voice. In 1987, he gave a speech at a peace march organized by the Communist Youth Association in Wittenberg that was so in line with the Erich Honecker government’s position that it ended up being broadcast on East German radio. In 1988, in a joint communiqué signed by Jusos and its Eastern youth equivalent, the FDJ, Scholz’s group expressed full support for the GDR’s political demands. With this action, they underscored their willingness to cooperate with youth organizations loyal to the Soviet regime in Moscow. The document proposed that the Jusos must anchor their peace proposals in the positions of the Soviet Union, the GDR and other socialist states.

Current German newspapers discussing the above documents point out triumphantly that Scholz has not been named an agent or informant for the Stasi, but in a standard political environment revelations of an overt, explicit and voluntary cooperation with a tyrannical regime such as the one in the GDR would be considered exceptionally damaging. Statements, such as the one in which he called Western democratic parliamentarism “bourgeois,” should raise eyebrows among large parts of the German electorate.

The positions of Scholz may have certainly developed since his radical Marxist years in the 1980s, but a past cooperation with a regime that had executed and imprisoned thousands of its citizens for decades, should be a disqualifying blemish on a CV of any constitutional player in modern democracies. Scholz, however, does not even receive so much as a hint of criticism in the mainstream media, a fact that paints a bleak picture of not only of the standards of the current German press, but of the likely future conduct of the radical leftist/environmentalist government that will dominate European politics over the coming four years.

https://rmx.news/germany/the-very-red-past-of-germanys-new-chancellor-revealed/

Rami A. (37) was in prison for assaulting and sexually harassing women. But the Syrian got out early and promptly attacked again. He was sentenced again at the local court in Dresden. But it was a recidivism that was to be expected.

In March 2019, the Dresden Regional Court sent the drywall builder behind bars for three years and three months.

In the Hechtviertel district of Dresden, he had assaulted seven women, groped them, pulled them to the ground, kissed them. He was only caught because a victim discovered him by chance and called the police.

From then on, Rami presented himself as a victim, denied the offences, blamed them on drugs and alcohol.

He was released in September 2020. Rami refused any therapy or rehabilitation while in prison. The expert opinion also warned of the danger of a “high rate of recidivism”. Even the probation officer tried hard, but in vain.Rami didn’t want to hear any more about his deeds. And promptly attacked again in the summer of 2021!

In the Friedrichstadt district, he attacked a physiotherapist in the entrance of her house at night. She fought back as hard as she could: “But only when I pressed my house key against his neck did he let go. I pushed him away and shouted ‘Fuck off’,” the woman said in court.

Then Rami wailed again, claiming that it was all a lie. Suddenly she said, “I definitely recognise that voice. That was the man.” Not only that led to his conviction: the police had found his DNA on the woman’s clothes.

Now Rami A. must be imprisoned for another three years and two months. And he will probably also have to serve the remaining 20 months from the previous verdict of the regional court.

https://www.tag24.de/justiz/gerichtsprozesse-dresden/kaum-aus-derhaft-entlassen-schlug-er-wieder-zu-frauenschreck-vom-hecht-faehrt-wieder-ein-2296000